2024.05.20 09:20 BruteSentiment Daily Minors Quick-Notes 5/19/24 - Jonah Cox is back in the Steals Race
Jonah Cox stole three bases in one game today, putting him back up the stolen base leaderboards across al of the minors. Meanwhile, continued hitting by Brady Whelan, Hunter Bishop, and Brett Auerbach couldn’t give Sacramento one more win against the Dodgers Triple-A team. submitted by BruteSentiment to SFGiants [link] [comments] AAA: Oklahoma City 6, Sacramento 4Linkhttps://preview.redd.it/jkmi1p1s8j1d1.jpg?width=2442&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a2cce6e482f2404e64bf8aba352940c8d319f9f6 Player of the Game: RF Brady Whalen: 3-3, 1 R, 1 2B (1), 1 BB Whalen had his first hits as a River Cat in his third day, having a perfect OBP day. Overall, Whelan is now 3-for-9 (.333) with the double, and three walks to two strikeouts in those three games. Other Players to Spotlight:
AA: Reading 6, Richmond 2Linkhttps://preview.redd.it/g6nglcxs8j1d1.jpg?width=2442&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=263d0cbc3a6311ddb01bcfd485e04d4eea2cc42e Player of the Game: 3B Luis Toribio: 2-3, 2 RBI, 1 2B (3), 1 BB, 1 K, 1 CS (1) 1 E (7) Toribio led the team in hitting with the two hits, and its only extra base hit. Through 24 games, Toribio is hitting just .189/.282/.338. Other Players to Spotlight:
High-A: Eugene 7, Everett 5Linkhttps://preview.redd.it/q140b32u8j1d1.jpg?width=2442&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e2d0db18b7383de70fdeadc160828d4d23ae3cb4 Player of the Game: 3B Justin Wishkoski: 4-5, 5 RBI, 1 2B (7), 1 3B (1), 1 E (8) Justin Wishkoski had a career-high four hits in this game, and picked up his first triple of his career. Wishkoski is hitting .250 on the year now, with seven doubles, a triple, and a home run. Other Players to Spotlight:
Low-A: San Jose 4, Modesto 1Linkhttps://preview.redd.it/htkwe6hv8j1d1.jpg?width=2442&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1d16ea91bd8066b3f153f1a77c0bd416d8c761ff Player of the Game: CF Jonah Cox: 2-3, 1 R, 2 RBI, 2 2B, 1 BB, 3 SB (24), 1 HBP Cox is now up to 4th overall in the overall minor league stolen base race, with the top player having 31 and the other two ahead of him with 25. Other Players to Spotlight:
|
2024.05.11 10:02 BruteSentiment Daily Minors Quick-Notes 5/10/24 - Roupp’s Effort Wasted
Well…today wasn’t a great day for the offense mostly. But there are some bright spots, including San Jose starting to score some runs, and the recently returned-to-starting Landen Roupp taking right back to it in Sacramento. submitted by BruteSentiment to SFGiants [link] [comments] AAA: Salt Lake 9, Sacramento 1Linkhttps://preview.redd.it/nx0lysxv7rzc1.jpg?width=2442&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=133f34218281dfe79f68d1b912986e7e3dc73467 Player of the Game: SP Landen Roupp: 4.0 IP, 1 H, 0 R, 0 BB, 6 K Landen Roupp was absolutely on in his second Sacramento appearance (and longest appearance of the year since he’s back to starting). He dominated the Bees in the form the Giants have likely been waiting for. Other Players to Spotlight:
AA: Erie 8, Richmond 0Linkhttps://preview.redd.it/5oue04yw7rzc1.jpg?width=2442&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=256d89b5065e312b0af82bbd2cc65eb153f534d9 Player of the Game: 2B Jimmy Glowenke: 2-3, 1 2B (2), 1 BB Glowenke had just his second double of the season in his 13th game, after missing most of three weeks in late April and early May. Glowenke has a batting line of .240/.345/.340. Other Players to Spotlight:
High-A: Tri-CIty 9, Eugene 4Linkhttps://preview.redd.it/wbwbpfny7rzc1.jpg?width=2442&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d40755d3092705a734c2f5bd10c6d0e577a6ea84 Player of the Game: 3B Justin Wishkoski: 1-4, 1 R, 3 RBI, 1 HR (1) Wishkoski’s picked up his first home run of the year in his 25th game. The 16th round pick in 2023 last season had two home runs in 28 games in his pro-debut. Other Players to Spotlight:
Low-A: San Jose 5, Stockton 2Linkhttps://preview.redd.it/d1sffeh08rzc1.jpg?width=2442&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=361b9466e9b0e40b802e563934831545d7189bd5 Player of the Game: DH Elian Rayo: 1-4, 1 R, 2 RBI, 1 HR, 1 K Rayo’s home run was the big hit for San Jose, tying the game up early and putting San Jose on the road to the victory. It’s Rayo’s second home run in as many games (and only two of the season). He had seven in 49 games last year in the ACL. Other Players to Spotlight:
ACL: ACL Athletics 7, ACL Giants 4Linkhttps://preview.redd.it/wayi7bn18rzc1.jpg?width=2442&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=10120ad1504239a9638aae40ee5de264ab687287 Player of the Game: CF Jose Ortiz: 2-3, 2 R, 1 BB, 2 SB (3) Ortiz’s hot start continues, as he has three straight 2-hit games, and is now 7-for-14 (.500) with three steals on four attempts. Other Notable Lines:
|
2024.05.04 15:02 Screwdatt Today's Games and PPV Events
2024.04.26 00:52 DenseDrama1695 Trade Advice
2024.04.22 16:05 wuertzy27 Obvious and Sneaky Investments (My List)
2024.04.22 14:22 jstasir Allure OTS :)
2024.04.22 02:51 Punkulf Backxwash - Wake up
2024.04.17 20:03 LeCrafteur7 The old style of the store was better
Nothing to see here, it's all in the name of the post submitted by LeCrafteur7 to WorldOfTanksBlitz [link] [comments] |
2024.04.17 17:52 BruteSentiment Daily Minors Quick-Notes 4/16/24 - Schmitt, Wyatt Home Runs power their respective offenses
No, Bryce Eldridge didn’t play today, and there’s no news. But there were some big hits and a bit of nice pitching on a short day on Tuesday. submitted by BruteSentiment to SFGiants [link] [comments] AAA: Sacramento 3, Oklahoma City 2Linkhttps://preview.redd.it/i5opbys5a2vc1.jpg?width=2442&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9ce5a1ec211dbf8615cf9784406e6995b7c04039 Player of the Game: 3B Casey Schmitt: 2-4, 1 R, 3 RBI, 1 HR (4), 1 K Schmitt took care of all of the River Cats runs over the “Baseball Club” (Yes, that’s Oklahoma City’s temporary name) in the first inning, with his 3-run home run, continuing his hot streak. Schmitt has a 6-game hitting streak, and all four home runs have come in the last four games. Other Players to Spotlight:
AA: Harrisburg 3, Richmond 2Linkhttps://preview.redd.it/uour0dc6a2vc1.jpg?width=2442&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b4dccf93441fe14ad89d6cc5f0679404361992f8 Player of the Game: 1B Logan Wyatt: 1-3, 1 R, 1 RBI, 1 HR (2) I know, there’s another name people are looking for, but in terms of game impact, Logan Wyatt with his home run was the biggest hit for the Squirrels. That’s Wyatt’s second home run of the season through eight games, and as he’s hitting just .200, but is slugging .520. Other Players to Spotlight:
Presumably due to scheduling conflicts with the University of Oregon, this day was planned to be off, with a doubleheader coming this weekend. Low-A: Modesto 14, San Jose 2Linkhttps://preview.redd.it/ktb50qw6a2vc1.jpg?width=2442&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f66a0ec642068fb7dc30473059e923ba6b959709 Player of the Game: RP Trent Harris: 2.0 IP, 0 H, 0 R, 0 BB, 5 K As the only Giants pitcher to really shut down the hit machine that Modesto was this Tuesday night, Harris gets the nod. Overall, he’s got 7 strikeouts to one walk and no hits allowed in 4.0 innings this season. Other Players to Spotlight:
|
2024.04.07 21:51 Tindo_Blends Has there ever been a cartoon that's affected your everyday dialect?
2024.04.03 06:09 SnakeBot POSTGAME THREAD 4/2 - Yankees (5-1) @ D-backs (4-2)
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R | H | E | LOB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NYY | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
AZ | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 12 | 0 | 8 |
Winning Pitcher | Losing Pitcher | Save |
---|---|---|
Gallen (2-0, 0.82 ERA) | Cortes (0-1, 6.30 ERA) |
2024.04.03 00:41 BaseballBot Game Thread 4/2 ⚾ Yankees (5-0) @ D-backs (3-2) 9:40 PM ET
Team | Starter | TV | Radio |
---|---|---|---|
Yankees | Nestor Cortes (0-0, 7.20 ERA) | YES | WFAN, WADO (ES) |
D-backs | Zac Gallen (1-0, 1.80 ERA) | ARID | 98.7 FM , KQMR (ES) |
MLB | Fangraphs | Reddit Stream | IRC Chat |
---|---|---|---|
Gameday | Game Graph | Live Comments | Libera: ##baseball |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R | H | E | LOB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NYY | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
AZ | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 12 | 0 | 8 |
AZ | AB | R | H | RBI | BB | SO | BA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2B | Marte, K | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .375 |
P | Jarvis | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .000 |
DH | Alexander | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | .400 |
2B | Peterson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .000 |
LF | Gurriel Jr. | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .308 |
1B | Walker, C | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | .292 |
3B | Suárez, E | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | .333 |
C | Moreno | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | .211 |
CF | Barrosa | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .200 |
RF | McCarthy | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .333 |
SS | Perdomo | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .300 |
AZ | IP | H | R | ER | BB | SO | P-S | ERA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gallen | 6.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 96-56 | 0.82 |
McGough | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 12-8 | 0.00 |
Thompson, R | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10-6 | 0.00 |
Jarvis | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13-7 | 4.50 |
NYY | AB | R | H | RBI | BB | SO | BA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2B | Torres | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .174 |
RF | Soto, J | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .417 |
CF | Judge | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | .125 |
1B | Rizzo | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .182 |
DH | Stanton | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | .150 |
LF | Verdugo | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .143 |
SS | Volpe | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | .529 |
3B | Cabrera, O | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .409 |
C | Trevino | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .111 |
C | Wells, A | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .200 |
NYY | IP | H | R | ER | BB | SO | P-S | ERA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cortes | 5.0 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 88-57 | 6.30 |
González, V | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 22-11 | 7.71 |
Cousins | 2.0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 40-26 | 4.50 |
Winning Pitcher | Losing Pitcher | Save |
---|---|---|
Gallen (2-0, 0.82 ERA) | Cortes (0-1, 6.30 ERA) |
Attendance | Weather | Wind |
---|---|---|
72°F, Clear | 4 mph, L To R |
HP | 1B | 2B | 3B |
---|---|---|---|
Scott Barry | Brian Walsh | Chris Segal | Larry Vanover |
2024.04.03 00:41 SnakeBot GAME THREAD: Yankees (5-0) @ D-backs (3-2) - 6:40 PM
Team | Starter | TV | Radio |
---|---|---|---|
Yankees | Nestor Cortes (0-0, 7.20 ERA) | YES | WFAN, WADO (ES) |
D-backs | Zac Gallen (1-0, 1.80 ERA) | ARID | 98.7 FM , KQMR (ES) |
MLB | Fangraphs | Baseball Savant | Reddit Stream | IRC Chat |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gameday | Game Graph | Strikezone Map | Live Comments | Libera: ##baseball |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R | H | E | LOB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NYY | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
AZ | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 12 | 0 | 8 |
AZ | AB | R | H | RBI | BB | SO | BA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2B | Marte, K | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .375 |
P | Jarvis | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .000 |
DH | Alexander | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | .400 |
2B | Peterson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .000 |
LF | Gurriel Jr. | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .308 |
1B | Walker, C | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | .292 |
3B | Suárez, E | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | .333 |
C | Moreno | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | .211 |
CF | Barrosa | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .200 |
RF | McCarthy | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .333 |
SS | Perdomo | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .300 |
AZ | IP | H | R | ER | BB | SO | P-S | ERA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gallen | 6.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 96-56 | 0.82 |
McGough | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 12-8 | 0.00 |
Thompson, R | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10-6 | 0.00 |
Jarvis | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13-7 | 4.50 |
NYY | AB | R | H | RBI | BB | SO | BA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2B | Torres | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .174 |
RF | Soto, J | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .417 |
CF | Judge | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | .125 |
1B | Rizzo | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .182 |
DH | Stanton | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | .150 |
LF | Verdugo | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .143 |
SS | Volpe | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | .529 |
3B | Cabrera, O | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .409 |
C | Trevino | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .111 |
C | Wells, A | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .200 |
NYY | IP | H | R | ER | BB | SO | P-S | ERA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cortes | 5.0 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 88-57 | 6.30 |
González, V | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 22-11 | 7.71 |
Cousins | 2.0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 40-26 | 4.50 |
Winning Pitcher | Losing Pitcher | Save |
---|---|---|
Gallen (2-0, 0.82 ERA) | Cortes (0-1, 6.30 ERA) |
2024.04.01 09:31 BruteSentiment Daily Minors Quick-Notes 3/31/24 - Pitching Dominates the Doubleheader
Two games for Sacramento in one Sunday, and they still needed extra innings to finish the day! But the big news is how Carson Whisenhunt and Mason Black dominated the day. submitted by BruteSentiment to SFGiants [link] [comments] AAA: DoubleheaderGame 1: Sacramento 1, Salt Lake 0 (7 Innings)Link https://preview.redd.it/wxbvykgfltrc1.jpg?width=2442&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=91074bd2e086267554063fe2c3b5237fe80ae757 Game 2: Salt Lake 3, Sacramento 2 (9 Innings) Link https://preview.redd.it/ypg1pvcgltrc1.jpg?width=2442&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f87d8733b2d32e417c9f660c1fd443e080c26f60 Player of the Games (tie): Carson Whisenhunt and Mason Black
|
2024.03.24 00:16 rodski32 AZ (11) @ SF (5) - Giants’ Cactus League finale - 3/23/2024
submitted by rodski32 to BaseballScorecards [link] [comments] |
2024.03.24 00:00 SnakeBot POSTGAME THREAD 3/23 - D-backs (0-0) @ Giants (0-0)
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R | H | E | LOB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AZ | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 9 |
SF | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 12 | 1 | 8 |
Description | Length |
---|---|
Blaze Alexander's RBI double | 0:27 |
Blake Snell joins the Giants' broadcast | 3:06 |
Victor Bericoto hits a two-run single | 0:28 |
Tom Murphy powers a solo home run | 0:28 |
Alek Thomas hits a bases-clearing triple | 0:30 |
Marco Luciano powers a solo home run | 0:30 |
Winning Pitcher | Losing Pitcher | Save |
---|---|---|
Allen, L.S. (1-1, 6.32 ERA) | Rogers, Ta (0-1, 6.75 ERA) |
2024.03.23 18:06 SnakeBot GAME THREAD: D-backs (0-0) @ Giants (0-0) - 1:05 PM
Team | Starter | TV | Radio |
---|---|---|---|
D-backs | Logan Allen (0-1, 4.63 ERA) | ||
Giants | Kyle Harrison (2-0, 1.93 ERA) | NBCSBA | KNBR |
MLB | Fangraphs | Baseball Savant | Reddit Stream | IRC Chat |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gameday | Game Graph | Strikezone Map | Live Comments | Libera: ##baseball |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R | H | E | LOB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AZ | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 9 |
SF | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 12 | 1 | 8 |
SF | AB | R | H | RBI | BB | SO | BA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SS | Luciano | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | .237 |
C | Morgan | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .000 |
LF | Conforto | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .278 |
3B | Glowenke | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .333 |
1B | Flores | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .351 |
LF | Sabol | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | .222 |
LF | Bishop | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .167 |
DH | Soler | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .333 |
DH | Slater | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .133 |
C | Murphy, To | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | .316 |
2B | Velasquez | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .667 |
2B | Fitzgerald | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | .214 |
SS | Wilson, W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .000 |
1B | Sandoval | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .200 |
1B | Wyatt | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .000 |
RF | Bericoto | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | .143 |
CF | Munguia | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .378 |
CF | McCray | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .167 |
SF | IP | H | R | ER | BB | SO | P-S | ERA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Harrison | 3.1 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 44-28 | 4.26 |
Rogers, Ty | 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5-4 | 1.17 |
Rogers, Ta | 0.2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 16-8 | 6.75 |
Andrews | 0.1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9-5 | 54.00 |
Walker, R | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 13-5 | 7.94 |
Miller, E | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7-7 | 2.25 |
Vogel | 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 15-7 | 0.00 |
AZ | AB | R | H | RBI | BB | SO | BA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RF | Carroll | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .300 |
RF | Graham | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | .111 |
3B | Alexander | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | .420 |
3B | Fernandez, Jo | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .000 |
LF | Gurriel Jr. | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | .333 |
LF | Johnson | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | .176 |
1B | Peterson | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | .267 |
1B | Sim | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .250 |
SS | Rivera, E | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | .186 |
SS | Torin, C | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | .000 |
CF | Thomas, A | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | .286 |
CF | Patiño | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .222 |
2B | Newman | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | .194 |
2B | Luis | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .250 |
C | Herrera, J | 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | .320 |
C | Martin, D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .500 |
DH | Conticello | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .000 |
DH | Valdez, Je | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | .500 |
DH | Boyd | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .000 |
AZ | IP | H | R | ER | BB | SO | P-S | ERA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Allen, L.S. | 4.0 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 33-27 | 6.32 |
Frías | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8-8 | 1.93 |
Ginkel | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5-5 | 1.80 |
Pilkington | 2.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 15-11 | 9.82 |
Pope | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 12-8 | 3.00 |
Description | Length |
---|---|
Blaze Alexander's RBI double | 0:27 |
Blake Snell joins the Giants' broadcast | 3:06 |
Victor Bericoto hits a two-run single | 0:28 |
Tom Murphy powers a solo home run | 0:28 |
Alek Thomas hits a bases-clearing triple | 0:30 |
Marco Luciano powers a solo home run | 0:30 |
Winning Pitcher | Losing Pitcher | Save |
---|---|---|
Allen, L.S. (1-1, 6.32 ERA) | Rogers, Ta (0-1, 6.75 ERA) |
2024.03.23 12:00 sfgbot Gameday Thread 3/23/24 D-backs (Allen, L.S.) @ Giants (Harrison) 1:05 PM
Team | Starter | TV | Radio |
---|---|---|---|
D-backs | Logan Allen (0-1, 4.63 ERA) | ||
Giants | Kyle Harrison (2-0, 1.93 ERA) | NBCSBA | KNBR |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R | H | E | LOB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AZ | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 9 |
SF | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 12 | 1 | 8 |
SF | AB | R | H | RBI | BB | SO | BA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SS | Luciano | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | .237 |
C | Morgan | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .000 |
LF | Conforto | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .278 |
3B | Glowenke | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .333 |
1B | Flores | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .351 |
LF | Sabol | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | .222 |
LF | Bishop | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .167 |
DH | Soler | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .333 |
DH | Slater | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .133 |
C | Murphy, To | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | .316 |
2B | Velasquez | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .667 |
2B | Fitzgerald | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | .214 |
SS | Wilson, W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .000 |
1B | Sandoval | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .200 |
1B | Wyatt | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .000 |
RF | Bericoto | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | .143 |
CF | Munguia | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .378 |
CF | McCray | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .167 |
SF | IP | H | R | ER | BB | SO | P-S | ERA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Harrison | 3.1 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 44-28 | 4.26 |
Rogers, Ty | 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5-4 | 1.17 |
Rogers, Ta | 0.2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 16-8 | 6.75 |
Andrews | 0.1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9-5 | 54.00 |
Walker, R | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 13-5 | 7.94 |
Miller, E | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7-7 | 2.25 |
Vogel | 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 15-7 | 0.00 |
AZ | AB | R | H | RBI | BB | SO | BA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RF | Carroll | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .300 |
RF | Graham | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | .111 |
3B | Alexander | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | .420 |
3B | Fernandez, Jo | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .000 |
LF | Gurriel Jr. | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | .333 |
LF | Johnson | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | .176 |
1B | Peterson | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | .267 |
1B | Sim | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .250 |
SS | Rivera, E | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | .186 |
SS | Torin, C | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | .000 |
CF | Thomas, A | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | .286 |
CF | Patiño | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .222 |
2B | Newman | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | .194 |
2B | Luis | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .250 |
C | Herrera, J | 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | .320 |
C | Martin, D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .500 |
DH | Conticello | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .000 |
DH | Valdez, Je | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | .500 |
DH | Boyd | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .000 |
AZ | IP | H | R | ER | BB | SO | P-S | ERA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Allen, L.S. | 4.0 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 33-27 | 6.32 |
Frías | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8-8 | 1.93 |
Ginkel | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5-5 | 1.80 |
Pilkington | 2.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 15-11 | 9.82 |
Pope | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 12-8 | 3.00 |
Description | Length |
---|---|
Blaze Alexander's RBI double | 0:27 |
Blake Snell joins the Giants' broadcast | 3:06 |
Victor Bericoto hits a two-run single | 0:28 |
Tom Murphy powers a solo home run | 0:28 |
Alek Thomas hits a bases-clearing triple | 0:30 |
Marco Luciano powers a solo home run | 0:30 |
Winning Pitcher | Losing Pitcher | Save |
---|---|---|
Allen, L.S. (1-1, 6.32 ERA) | Rogers, Ta (0-1, 6.75 ERA) |
Streams | ||
Tracker | MLB.com | Game Graph |
GO GET YOUR FLAIR IN THE SIDEBAR! |
---|
2024.03.10 06:16 CascalaVasca Why PH revere BlueEyed Mary unlike other nonwhite countries?
Multiple posters have mentioned so many times of how Latinos worship white skin which is why the Hispanista movement is foolish and also a few have mentioned one advantage is that Blanqueamiento was never instituted n the Philippines an very few white Europeans lived in the country and intermarried so while pale skin s still seen as ideal, being dark skinned n the PI isn't seen as despicable as it is across much of Latin America........................... At least the Philippines (because of far fewer Iberian colonial influence), a dark skinned male can not only work across Span's colonial system to at least rise up in wealth classes and eve if he plays his card rights, rise up the social caste system Spain enforced in the country. For males at least, while light skin is preferred, dark skinned males are not denied being considered hot and there were brown celebrities who were sex symbols. In fact some of the earliest male leading actors were dark skinned (or at least not Caucasian levels of whiteness thus appearing dark n some shots).Indeed now that I think of it I do have to ask myself. Why is white artistic representations of Mother Mary so much the norm in the Philippines unlike other nonwhite countries that suffered under colonialism? Why did no equivalent of local Lady of Guadalupe ever come to be the symbol of the Philippines as the quoted text points out? Afterall other countries with Catholics as a tiny minority such as Vietnam and Morocco have Mother Mary artwork used in reverence that looks like the commoner of said countries or at least fit the very much non-white ideals of beauty as seen in the case of Vietnam where La Vang pretty much ideal features not common in Vietnam such as pale skin while still wearing Vietnamese clothes with physical features that are unmistakenbly Vietnamese in overall physical appearance.
Yet in a paradox........ For all how much Hispanics worship white skin and the mostly European descended castizos and Criollos who are the ruling class of Latin America and have their movie stars, divas, and beauty queens as white females................. its been a tradition across Latin America for people who use a Mary Statues that reflects their ethnic, regional, racial, and socioeconomic class in physical appearance.......
So in other words in Cuba for example the Blacks who are the bottom of the social ladder often worship Our Lady of Regla who is basically a black Virgin Mary. Dominican Republic has their own local black Marys. Our Lady of Mount Carmel, a pale Virgin Mary, is worshiped very frequently across Chile which has a larger proportion of light skinned Mestizos than many LatAm nations. The Indios create Mary often to resemble Incan and other pre-conquest Indian civilization ideals of beauty.
In fact in some nations with a more balanced outspread of light skin pigmentation you may even see variety of a specific Mary. The Lady of Guadalupe was specifically seen as being very Mestizo. So while most depictions of her are stereotypical Latino brown, its common to see her with lighter shades of skin in statues and paintings across Mexico. One cartoon show depicts her as olive that can appear darker or lighter depending on the scene and who she's standing next to and I seen Guadalupe statues that are milky white. As well as some as dark as your typical black American. As well as "redskin" Guadalupe Its a common thing for Mestizos and other lower classes in Mexico to choose a Guadalupe with skin color similar to themselves or more commonly closer to how their own mother or grandma or some female matriarchal figure appeared. So you'd have pale girls from poor working class families worshiping a crayon brown Guadalupe because their mom is a typical Moreno as well as well swarthy men who work as janitors choosing yellowish Guadalupe because they were born with Southern Italian olive skin and thus identify with tanned but still light skinned variations (even though ma and pa is dark skinned). So their is variety of representation for anyone to choose for Lady of Guadalupe.
In fact many churches in the country feature dark skinned Guadalupe and more popular European tradition like Lady of Lourdes to accommodate everyone in Church. Some Churches even intentionally will try to leave a white Jesus Christ with only a brown Guadalupe statue because the local priest wants to encourage integration and fight against racism. In some cases the Jesus will intentionally be painted iron or be made out of bronze or use some color associated with metals that do not exist in humans sometimes with ambiguous facial features in order to further prove equality of races in the Catholic Church right next to the Guadalupe statue.
So I'd have to ask why in the Philippines the Mary statues are overwhelming the ones used in Europe? In particular the blue eyed Mary in white headcloth and blue cloak? I mean the country is relatively liberal about dark skinned people esp males advancing in the social stratas even during Spanish colonialism and at least its possible for a male to be brown yet still become a sex symbol and even A list celeb despite the entertainment industry's preferences for light skin.
So how come unlike Latin America, Philippines use almost exclusively white Virgin Mary? Even despite the Church openly unveiling dark skinned ones in a few locations? Why isn't the local equivalents of Guadalupe popular for personal household use?
2024.03.10 06:13 CascalaVasca What happened in history that led to Using White often Blue Eyed Mary statues as the norm in the Philippines? When Blanqueamiento wasn't even a thing in PH unlike Spain's other colonies? Esp in face of poor Latinos adoring white skin but still using nonwhite Mary art (as seen in Lady of Guadalupe)?
Multiple posters have mentioned so many times of how Latinos worship white skin which is why the Hispanista movement is foolish and also a few have mentioned one advantage is that Blanqueamiento was never instituted n the Philippines an very few white Europeans lived in the country and intermarried so while pale skin s still seen as ideal, being dark skinned n the PI isn't seen as despicable as it is across much of Latin America........................... At least the Philippines (because of far fewer Iberian colonial influence), a dark skinned male can not only work across Span's colonial system to at least rise up in wealth classes and eve if he plays his card rights, rise up the social caste system Spain enforced in the country. For males at least, while light skin is preferred, dark skinned males are not denied being considered hot and there were brown celebrities who were sex symbols. In fact some of the earliest male leading actors were dark skinned (or at least not Caucasian levels of whiteness thus appearing dark n some shots).Indeed now that I think of it I do have to ask myself. Why is white artistic representations of Mother Mary so much the norm in the Philippines unlike other nonwhite countries that suffered under colonialism? Why did no equivalent of local Lady of Guadalupe ever come to be the symbol of the Philippines as the quoted text points out? Afterall other countries with Catholics as a tiny minority such as Vietnam and Morocco have Mother Mary artwork used in reverence that looks like the commoner of said countries or at least fit the very much non-white ideals of beauty as seen in the case of Vietnam where La Vang pretty much ideal features not common in Vietnam such as pale skin while still wearing Vietnamese clothes with physical features that are unmistakenbly Vietnamese in overall physical appearance.
Yet in a paradox........ For all how much Hispanics worship white skin and the mostly European descended castizos and Criollos who are the ruling class of Latin America and have their movie stars, divas, and beauty queens as white females................. its been a tradition across Latin America for people who use a Mary Statues that reflects their ethnic, regional, racial, and socioeconomic class in physical appearance.......
So in other words in Cuba for example the Blacks who are the bottom of the social ladder often worship Our Lady of Regla who is basically a black Virgin Mary. Dominican Republic has their own local black Marys. Our Lady of Mount Carmel, a pale Virgin Mary, is worshiped very frequently across Chile which has a larger proportion of light skinned Mestizos than many LatAm nations. The Indios create Mary often to resemble Incan and other pre-conquest Indian civilization ideals of beauty.
In fact in some nations with a more balanced outspread of light skin pigmentation you may even see variety of a specific Mary. The Lady of Guadalupe was specifically seen as being very Mestizo. So while most depictions of her are stereotypical Latino brown, its common to see her with lighter shades of skin in statues and paintings across Mexico. One cartoon show depicts her as olive that can appear darker or lighter depending on the scene and who she's standing next to and I seen Guadalupe statues that are milky white. As well as some as dark as your typical black American. As well as "redskin" Guadalupe Its a common thing for Mestizos and other lower classes in Mexico to choose a Guadalupe with skin color similar to themselves or more commonly closer to how their own mother or grandma or some female matriarchal figure appeared. So you'd have pale girls from poor working class families worshiping a crayon brown Guadalupe because their mom is a typical Moreno as well as well swarthy men who work as janitors choosing yellowish Guadalupe because they were born with Southern Italian olive skin and thus identify with tanned but still light skinned variations (even though ma and pa is dark skinned). So their is variety of representation for anyone to choose for Lady of Guadalupe.
In fact many churches in the country feature dark skinned Guadalupe and more popular European tradition like Lady of Lourdes to accommodate everyone in Church. Some Churches even intentionally will try to leave a white Jesus Christ with only a brown Guadalupe statue because the local priest wants to encourage integration and fight against racism. In some cases the Jesus will intentionally be painted iron or be made out of bronze or use some color associated with metals that do not exist in humans sometimes with ambiguous facial features in order to further prove equality of races in the Catholic Church right next to the Guadalupe statue.
So I'd have to ask why in the Philippines the Mary statues are overwhelming the ones used in Europe? In particular the blue eyed Mary in white headcloth and blue cloak? I mean the country is relatively liberal about dark skinned people esp males advancing in the social stratas even during Spanish colonialism and at least its possible for a male to be brown yet still become a sex symbol and even A list celeb despite the entertainment industry's preferences for light skin.
So how come unlike Latin America, Philippines use almost exclusively white Virgin Mary? Even despite the Church openly unveiling dark skinned ones in a few locations? Why isn't the local equivalents of Guadalupe popular for personal household use?
2024.03.10 06:12 CascalaVasca What happened in history that led to Using White often Blue Eyed Mary statues as the norm in the Philippines? When Blanqueamiento wasn't even a thing in PH unlike Spain's other colonies? Esp in face of poor Latinos adoring white skin but still using nonwhite Mary art (as seen in Lady of Guadalupe)?
Multiple posters have mentioned so many times of how Latinos worship white skin which is why the Hispanista movement is foolish and also a few have mentioned one advantage is that Blanqueamiento was never instituted n the Philippines an very few white Europeans lived in the country and intermarried so while pale skin s still seen as ideal, being dark skinned n the PI isn't seen as despicable as it is across much of Latin America........................... At least the Philippines (because of far fewer Iberian colonial influence), a dark skinned male can not only work across Span's colonial system to at least rise up in wealth classes and eve if he plays his card rights, rise up the social caste system Spain enforced in the country. For males at least, while light skin is preferred, dark skinned males are not denied being considered hot and there were brown celebrities who were sex symbols. In fact some of the earliest male leading actors were dark skinned (or at least not Caucasian levels of whiteness thus appearing dark n some shots).Indeed now that I think of it I do have to ask myself. Why is white artistic representations of Mother Mary so much the norm in the Philippines unlike other nonwhite countries that suffered under colonialism? Why did no equivalent of local Lady of Guadalupe ever come to be the symbol of the Philippines as the quoted text points out? Afterall other countries with Catholics as a tiny minority such as Vietnam and Morocco have Mother Mary artwork used in reverence that looks like the commoner of said countries or at least fit the very much non-white ideals of beauty as seen in the case of Vietnam where La Vang pretty much ideal features not common in Vietnam such as pale skin while still wearing Vietnamese clothes with physical features that are unmistakenbly Vietnamese in overall physical appearance.
Yet in a paradox........ For all how much Hispanics worship white skin and the mostly European descended castizos and Criollos who are the ruling class of Latin America and have their movie stars, divas, and beauty queens as white females................. its been a tradition across Latin America for people who use a Mary Statues that reflects their ethnic, regional, racial, and socioeconomic class in physical appearance.......
So in other words in Cuba for example the Blacks who are the bottom of the social ladder often worship Our Lady of Regla who is basically a black Virgin Mary. Dominican Republic has their own local black Marys. Our Lady of Mount Carmel, a pale Virgin Mary, is worshiped very frequently across Chile which has a larger proportion of light skinned Mestizos than many LatAm nations. The Indios create Mary often to resemble Incan and other pre-conquest Indian civilization ideals of beauty.
In fact in some nations with a more balanced outspread of light skin pigmentation you may even see variety of a specific Mary. The Lady of Guadalupe was specifically seen as being very Mestizo. So while most depictions of her are stereotypical Latino brown, its common to see her with lighter shades of skin in statues and paintings across Mexico. One cartoon show depicts her as olive that can appear darker or lighter depending on the scene and who she's standing next to and I seen Guadalupe statues that are milky white. As well as some as dark as your typical black American. As well as "redskin" Guadalupe Its a common thing for Mestizos and other lower classes in Mexico to choose a Guadalupe with skin color similar to themselves or more commonly closer to how their own mother or grandma or some female matriarchal figure appeared. So you'd have pale girls from poor working class families worshiping a crayon brown Guadalupe because their mom is a typical Moreno as well as well swarthy men who work as janitors choosing yellowish Guadalupe because they were born with Southern Italian olive skin and thus identify with tanned but still light skinned variations (even though ma and pa is dark skinned). So their is variety of representation for anyone to choose for Lady of Guadalupe.
In fact many churches in the country feature dark skinned Guadalupe and more popular European tradition like Lady of Lourdes to accommodate everyone in Church. Some Churches even intentionally will try to leave a white Jesus Christ with only a brown Guadalupe statue because the local priest wants to encourage integration and fight against racism. In some cases the Jesus will intentionally be painted iron or be made out of bronze or use some color associated with metals that do not exist in humans sometimes with ambiguous facial features in order to further prove equality of races in the Catholic Church right next to the Guadalupe statue.
So I'd have to ask why in the Philippines the Mary statues are overwhelming the ones used in Europe? In particular the blue eyed Mary in white headcloth and blue cloak? I mean the country is relatively liberal about dark skinned people esp males advancing in the social stratas even during Spanish colonialism and at least its possible for a male to be brown yet still become a sex symbol and even A list celeb despite the entertainment industry's preferences for light skin.
So how come unlike Latin America, Philippines use almost exclusively white Virgin Mary? Even despite the Church openly unveiling dark skinned ones in a few locations? Why isn't the local equivalents of Guadalupe popular for personal household use?
2024.03.10 06:03 CascalaVasca Why Almost All Filipinos Use a White often Blue Eyed Mary Statues despite lack of Blanqueamiento in the PI? And esp in face of poor Latinos worshiping white skin but still using Mary artwork that resembles their local and social classes nonwhite physical appearance (as seen in Lady of Guadalupe)?
Multiple posters have mentioned so many times of how Latinos worship white skin which is why the Hispanista movement is foolish and also a few have mentioned one advantage is that Blanqueamiento was never instituted n the Philippines an very few white Europeans lived in the country and intermarried so while pale skin s still seen as ideal, being dark skinned n the PI isn't seen as despicable as it is across much of Latin America........................... At least the Philippines (because of far fewer Iberian colonial influence), a dark skinned male can not only work across Span's colonial system to at least rise up in wealth classes and eve if he plays his card rights, rise up the social caste system Spain enforced in the country. For males at least, while light skin is preferred, dark skinned males are not denied being considered hot and there were brown celebrities who were sex symbols. In fact some of the earliest male leading actors were dark skinned (or at least not Caucasian levels of whiteness thus appearing dark n some shots).Indeed now that I think of it I do have to ask myself. Why is white artistic representations of Mother Mary so much the norm in the Philippines unlike other nonwhite countries that suffered under colonialism? Why did no equivalent of local Lady of Guadalupe ever come to be the symbol of the Philippines as the quoted text points out? Afterall other countries with Catholics as a tiny minority such as Vietnam and Morocco have Mother Mary artwork used in reverence that looks like the commoner of said countries or at least fit the very much non-white ideals of beauty as seen in the case of Vietnam where La Vang pretty much ideal features not common in Vietnam such as pale skin while still wearing Vietnamese clothes with physical features that are unmistakenbly Vietnamese in overall physical appearance.
Yet in a paradox........ For all how much Hispanics worship white skin and the mostly European descended castizos and Criollos who are the ruling class of Latin America and have their movie stars, divas, and beauty queens as white females................. its been a tradition across Latin America for people who use a Mary Statues that reflects their ethnic, regional, racial, and socioeconomic class in physical appearance.......
So in other words in Cuba for example the Blacks who are the bottom of the social ladder often worship Our Lady of Regla who is basically a black Virgin Mary. Dominican Republic has their own local black Marys. Our Lady of Mount Carmel, a pale Virgin Mary, is worshiped very frequently across Chile which has a larger proportion of light skinned Mestizos than many LatAm nations. The Indios create Mary often to resemble Incan and other pre-conquest Indian civilization ideals of beauty.
In fact in some nations with a more balanced outspread of light skin pigmentation you may even see variety of a specific Mary. The Lady of Guadalupe was specifically seen as being very Mestizo. So while most depictions of her are stereotypical Latino brown, its common to see her with lighter shades of skin in statues and paintings across Mexico. One cartoon show depicts her as olive that can appear darker or lighter depending on the scene and who she's standing next to and I seen Guadalupe statues that are milky white. As well as some as dark as your typical black American. As well as "redskin" Guadalupe Its a common thing for Mestizos and other lower classes in Mexico to choose a Guadalupe with skin color similar to themselves or more commonly closer to how their own mother or grandma or some female matriarchal figure appeared. So you'd have pale girls from poor working class families worshiping a crayon brown Guadalupe because their mom is a typical Moreno as well as well swarthy men who work as janitors choosing yellowish Guadalupe because they were born with Southern Italian olive skin and thus identify with tanned but still light skinned variations (even though ma and pa is dark skinned). So their is variety of representation for anyone to choose for Lady of Guadalupe.
In fact many churches in the country feature dark skinned Guadalupe and more popular European tradition like Lady of Lourdes to accommodate everyone in Church. Some Churches even intentionally will try to leave a white Jesus Christ with only a brown Guadalupe statue because the local priest wants to encourage integration and fight against racism. In some cases the Jesus will intentionally be painted iron or be made out of bronze or use some color associated with metals that do not exist in humans sometimes with ambiguous facial features in order to further prove equality of races in the Catholic Church right next to the Guadalupe statue.
So I'd have to ask why in the Philippines the Mary statues are overwhelming the ones used in Europe? In particular the blue eyed Mary in white headcloth and blue cloak? I mean the country is relatively liberal about dark skinned people esp males advancing in the social stratas even during Spanish colonialism and at least its possible for a male to be brown yet still become a sex symbol and even A list celeb despite the entertainment industry's preferences for light skin.
So how come unlike Latin America, Philippines use almost exclusively white Virgin Mary? Even despite the Church openly unveiling dark skinned ones in a few locations? Why isn't the local equivalents of Guadalupe popular for personal household use?