So, I want to give a shout out and a thank you to u/blackjackbjc because of this reply he gave concerning the timing. Therefore, if we add 30 days for the grace period, 6/11 turns into 7/11/2024 which is more in line with 9 months from the time Dr. Lalezari more than likely decided to come on board with CytoDyn. Thank you blackjack and thank you u/Insider1209887 for helping me on this and with the Scott Kelly statement that there is more than one way to create a partnership.
So, I have no authority. I just write things down as I see it. You can read my opinions and understand what I think, but you should always do your own diligence to form your own basis and interpretation.
So, today, I wanted to review some more of the things Tyler Blok said. So, he talked also about Amarex. Let's read it again.

"Tyler Blok 04:33: Samsung, Amarex
Thanks Jay. So as always, we are very much restricted on what we can share by way of legal regulatory and IP matters, but we did want to make a point to share what we can at this time. And we do think it's important. So, first and foremost, and mostly, by way of a recap, we were very pleased with the recent result in the Samsung dispute.
Needless to say, the Samsung this resolution removes significant short-term pressure on the company and also allows us to now use our immediate resources and funds to get back into the clinic and all those related preparations. We appreciate Samsung's willingness to come to an agreement in the end and also in that it was structured in a way that allows them to be repaid in line with the future success of CytoDyn.
And to the Amarex Litigation, we are very much aware of the overwhelming investor interest in this proceeding but there's not much we can say as it relates to this pending litigation matter. So, what I'll do is I'll just do a recap of what we can right? As this goes in our recent SEC filings, the arbitration is set to commence, November 11th 2024. That arbitration proceeding itself can sometimes last multiple weeks.
Typically, an award is issued by the arbitrator approximately 30 to 60 days after the conclusion of the arbitration proceeding. So again, you have an arbitration proceeding, a couple weeks, maybe, 30 to 60 days thereafter, you can potentially see an award from the arbitrator. OK?
Tyler Blok 06:05: Settlement Offers, Settlement Discussions
The company. What's been going on recently? The company has been working recently with Sidley Austin on a number of Discovery objectives in the litigation.
We continue to collect evidence for our claims and make preparations for the arbitration later this year. We also, and this was disclosed in filings as well, we remain open to settlement offers from Amarex and we, in fact, remain in settlement discussions with them at this time, as to when you could potentially see a settlement on that front.
The case could theoretically settle at any time before the conclusion of the arbitration proceedings. But at this time, we really, we simply remain committed to maximizing the result for the company and that could be whether through settlement or arbitration, again, the focus on maximizing the result for the company. The typical lawyer close-off, as this is an ongoing litigation matter, we cannot comment further at this time."

Basically, Tyler is saying that they would like to bring this to a close as soon as possible, but if they can't arrive to a settlement offer that is agreed upon by both CytoDyn as well as Amarex, then it will have to be decided in arbitration beginning November 11, 2024. So, CytoDyn is preparing with Sidley Austin on a number of Discovery Objectives in expectation that this could go to arbitration and CytoDyn's intentions are to maximize the arbitration award, but CytoDyn also remains open to settlement offers up until the date of arbitration.
Surely all the twatwaffles and even Amarex themselves would like all of us to believe that CytoDyn should just call it quits because they have no chance on collecting anything and instead of Amarex owing anything to CytoDyn, the end result will be that CytoDyn owes Amarex. Nobody and I mean nobody on CytoDyn's end even remotely believes this. Let's take Samsung mentioned above. If Samsung believed that CytoDyn would owe Amarex $13 million, would Samsung have agreed to defer the payment of the debt owed to them? Samsung knows that a ruling against CytoDyn in the Amarex arbitration would not bode well for CytoDyn's future and if that were in fact to occur, Samsung just as well should kiss goodbye those ~$36 million owed them. But they did agree to a deferred payment because they believe Amarex will pay CytoDyn and do not believe the opposite.
Is Amarex looking for some concessions from CytoDyn? Could they be looking for some compromises made by CytoDyn, that if agreed to, then, they would put forth a settlement offer? Like what? Not to rip KK apart? Not to defraud the stellar reputation Amarex is attempting to protect? Is CytoDyn looking for more than just a large cash settlement? What about further lawsuits with Amarex or lawsuits to go after those who spurred Amarex to do what they did? Does Amarex want CytoDyn to give up their right to pursue these things if they were to receive an appropriate cash settlement? Thank you u/sunraydoc for that great post. You need to post way more often.
On the topic of Discovery Objectives in the event this goes to arbitration, I would be interested in a quantitative calculation of both compensatory damages as well as punitive damages, (as it is obvious Amarex acted in such a harmful way as sunraydoc pointed to), but you can also refer to some of the following posts to get a better idea:

I would say CytoDyn/Sidley Austin would need the help of an expert quantitative economist to come to an appropriate calculation of what the compensatory damages really would sum up to. I'd say Sidley Austin already has their own that could do that. As to the punitive damages, that should include learning from KK who put Amarex up to this and extracting those damages from the puppet master.
These settlement talks can only go on for so long. They can go up to November 11, 2024. A settlement could be reached even on November 10, 2024, but it would be unlikely CytoDyn would agree to any quantity even modestly less than the minimum they would entertain, the closer it is to that November 11 date. This means that the sooner a settlement is agreed upon, the less Amarex might have to pay. And once they pay, all of this talk on Amarex would go away. All that is agreed upon in the settlement offer would need to be abided by. Whatever clauses of compromise and stipulations posed, must be adhered to, so, if Amarex was smart, they would get the greatest bang for their buck by choosing to make an agreeable settlement offer soon.
Does Amarex have hopes of surviving once this settlement/arbitration award is paid? Would NSF continue to maintain that business? Possibly, if a settlement is agreed to, but probably not, if it goes to arbitration, because in the arbitration, I don't think CytoDyn will do any more compromise. Now is the time for compromise. Later, if they choose to ignore this opportunity they have, then later, CytoDyn and Sidley Austin will have no mercy. And if NSF intends on maintaining Amarex following the result of this arbitrage, then they too should realize the importance of this time period that is rapidly running out within which they have the opportunity to salvage as much as they can of their company they unfortunately purchased.
CytoDyn ain't backing down. The terms stipulated by Tyler Blok will be adhered to until that day. The pressure is on Amarex and NSF. Nothing will dissuade CytoDyn / SA from carrying out this necessary justice. There is too much CytoDyn has against them. The suit originally was Amarex suing CytoDyn for something like $13.5 million, but after David Welch put up the $6.5 million bond, Sidley Austin reversed the suit and CytoDyn now is suing Amarex.
CytoDyn is expecting at a minimum $100 million + the return back of the $6.5 million bond. But, if this goes to arbitration, much more than this can be expected. I'd say CytoDyn might be willing to accept $75 million in month of June, then $80 million in month of July, then $85 million August, $95 million September, $105 million October and then, if these offers were not made, then, it goes to arbitration. I'm sure Mitch Cohen with Dr. Lalezari's guidance, already has in mind how he would intend to allocate such funds which would be in CytoDyn's account at most 60 days following the settlement offer. This would end the war with Amarex, and Tyler Blok along with Sidley Austin need to make these decisions as to how much they are willing to accept.
As of this date, no settlement offer has been agreed upon and so, they continue to press on in their pursuit of the Discovery Objectives.
One option that just occurred to me, what if Amarex assured CytoDyn that they have a willing partner that would pay top dollar for CytoDyn, but only if this arbitration was completely dropped and all charges against KK and anyone else involved were also dropped? Say they have a buyer of CytoDyn for $15 billion, which would only occur if these charges were dropped, would that deal be taken or agreed to? I think that might be one way they could remove this noose from around their necks. This would mean that CytoDyn drop all charges and give up all their goals in attempting to reach justice in the matter. Letting bygones be bygones.
Those who remain as shareholders in the company would receive their benefit, but what about shareholder who exited because of what Amarex did? There would be no justice for them in any settlement. And why would CytoDyn choose to believe anything Amarex might say or offer? Were they trustworthy before? Or were they only capable of lies? If CytoDyn chooses to lift the pressure just a bit, will Amarex take advantage of that and undo all the progress CytoDyn made with Sidley Austin? How can you resume something you stopped already? That is a difficult proposition because then, there would be too many that would object to CytoDyn reintroducing the crime. Only Blok and SA can make that decision as to whether or not to accept such an offer. They might say to themselves, let us make this offer to CytoDyn knowing that this is our only opportunity to escape the fate befallen us and if they take it, and drop the case, we can go back on the offensive, all over again.
CytoDyn cannot afford to not finish this in the manner already decided upon by both CytoDyn/SA and Amarex/NSF. Tyler Blok affirms this and re-affirms this a few times already that their intention is to pursue this until the end. We already know the end date being 30-60 days after November 11, 2024 or sooner and when it is over, it will be finished, unless it goes to arbitration where further lawsuits might be initiated if agreed upon by the arbitrator. Yes, CytoDyn will receive its due award, but possibly even more. Tyler's intention is to maximize the result. Maximize the pain to Amarex. This is the way he described it. This is the way he feels. What do you expect knowing this?
KK testifies and implicates his puppet master. All agreed upon settlements are paid to CytoDyn. CytoDyn puts forth another suit against puppet master. Headline news. Does Amarex / NSF really want it to end this way when all they have to do is pay so much less now upfront? Blok is very confident. The Discovery Objectives are powerful evidence and Sidley Austin has the resources and experience in winning slam dunk awards. This continues until an appropriate settlement offer is made with reasonable contingencies and concessions. This would end the dispute.
I get the impression that Blok and SA are closer than we all might think. They are in talks right now. It seems to me they can see the light at the end of the tunnel. I think I'm done with this subject.
9 days until LIVIMMUNE is Issued and becomes Active, then remember to add 30 more until the grace period is over. Let's hope nobody objects.

I have thick hair, but my hairline is starting to recede. I'm having a hard time finding a clinic for a hair transplant. I've been considering Dr. Kenneth Bushwach, who has received many positive reviews on Reddit, and his clinic is conveniently located just 10 minutes away from where I live. However, I know that getting the procedure done overseas is much cheaper. Any suggestions or clinic recommendations?

2 days ago I had targeted fibrin glue injected to seal the holes from my myelogram. During the procedure they gave me a bunch of IV medication including Benadryl, fentanyl, pain medication and a few others I can't remember.
I was completely calm, didn't feel any pain but rather felt like I was going to fall asleep when all of a sudden my heart started racing and got up to 150 bpm. The team began trying to calm me down, they inverted me on the table, took my socks off and flipped me over onto my back and my heart rate slowly began dropping.
The dr said he wasn't sure why that happened but it could have been a reaction to the glue. I sort of think it could be from the medication as there were a variety of them and I can be sensitive to new meds (although I mentioned this to them before the procedure and they gave me a smaller dose). Afterwards I felt so out of it from the meds and had low blood pressure, I think the nurse said it was 90/60 or 80/60, i'm 24 and generally healthy for context.
That experience was so scary and i'm due to have another patch done next week and terrified that it's going to happen again.

When Trump was first campaigning for president, he said, "I know all the best people". The inference was with his personal experience he knew, and would be able to recruit, the most qualified candidates for his cabinet and to act as his advisors.
The problem was Trump was a crook and many of the people he associated with were crooks, too.
Once he got his tiny hands into the presidential cookie jar there was no stopping him. He, and his family made untold millions through schemes too numerous to count, including a very suspicious deal with the Saudis that brought two billion dollars to his son-in-law about the time Trump was caught stealing our most vital defense secrets.
Those secrets may no longer be secret and now in possession of the Russians, the Chinese, and North Korea. Secrets such as the details of our missile defense system, our nuclear program, the location of our atomic submarines that guarantee total nuclear destruction of any enemy (provided they don't know where those submarines are), and secrets so secret we don't even know what they could be.
What else would Trump sell if he has the cooperation of a self-appointed group of like-minded Republican legislators.?
Here's a reminder of the last group of 'Best People'. Can you imagine what the next group might comprise?
Donald Trump was charged, convicted, and is awaiting sentencing for 34 felonies.
Trump’s former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, was charged, convicted, and sentenced to prison.
Trump’s former campaign vice chairman, Rick Gates, was charged, convicted, and sentenced to prison.
Trump’s former personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, was charged, convicted, and sentenced to prison.
Trump’s former adviser and former campaign aide, Roger Stone, was charged, convicted, and sentenced to prison.
Trump’s former adviser and former White House aide Peter Navarro, was charged, convicted, and is currently in prison.
Trump’s former campaign adviser, George Papadopoulos, was charged, convicted, and sentenced to prison.
The Trump Organization’s former CFO, Allen Weisselberg, was charged, convicted, and sentenced to prison.
Trump’s former White House national security advisor, Michael Flynn, was charged and convicted. Trump’s former chief strategist, Steve Bannon, was charged with wire fraud and money laundering, in addition to a conviction in a contempt case similar to Navarro’s. He’s currently awaiting sentencing.
Though he was later acquitted at trial, Trump’s former inaugural committee chair, Tom Barrack, was charged with illegally lobbying Trump on behalf of a foreign government. (Elliot Broidy was the vice chair of Trump’s inaugural committee, and he found himself at the center of multiple controversies, and also pled guilty to federal charges related to illegal lobbying.)
Two lawyers associated with Trump’s post-defeat efforts, Kenneth Chesebro and Sidney Powell, have pleaded guilty to election-related crimes.
It should be mentioned that former president’s business was itself found guilty of tax fraud? Because he was.
This does not include the fact Trump has been convicted of being a sexual abuser, is still facing more civil suits and will soon be indicted in four separate states for election interference, atop of two looming Federal, and one state trials.
Think about this before you pull a lever for a Republican -- any Republican!

Zeynep has her faults, but a decent warning article: (no paywall) https://archive.ph/R0dru
"The Michigan Department of Health and Human Services reported on Thursday that another farmworker has been infected with H5N1, an avian flu virus. Alarmingly, unlike earlier cases, he has respiratory symptoms. This means the virus is in his lungs, where it has a better chance to evolve into an airborne form that could easily infect others.
Viruses often hit a dead end when they cross from one species to another, getting stuck at their first victim. For example, H5N1 has been around since the 1990s, but most patients have had extensive, direct contact with sick poultry and almost never pass it on to other humans.
The pathogens that have the greatest potential to set off a pandemic often have a deadly combination of airborne transmission and frequent mild cases, allowing them to spread widely and stealthily. That’s a key reason there hasn’t yet been an Ebola pandemic. The disease causes severe illness and kills most victims, and it mainly spreads through close contact with infected bodily fluids. It has fewer chances to spread widely than another disease might.
The United States is certainly giving H5N1 many, many chances to adapt to spreading easily and quietly among humans.
Cows started getting sick with H5N1 last winter, but unlike birds with H5N1, they weren’t dying. It took dogged investigation by Dr. Barb Petersen, a veterinarian in Texas, to determine that they were afflicted with a form of avian influenza. When we spoke, she told me that whenever cows fell sick on farms she monitored, an unusual number of people also became ill.
In April, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported a farmworker in Texas had been infected with H5N1. This month, state health officials in Michigan found two more human cases (including the one reported on Thursday). Even so, public health officials have largely been slow to establish the sort of widespread testing and data sharing that would give Americans the best chance at stopping an H5N1 pandemic.
This month, Dr. Mandy Cohen, the director of the C.D.C., told The New York Times there were no immediate plans to make testing mandatory. But if we don’t test for H5N1, we won’t find it.
As Rick Bright, an expert on the H5N1 virus who served on President Biden’s coronavirus advisory board, told me: “We are missing additional cases by not testing. We are missing evolutionary patterns of the virus by not sequencing more. We are also losing the trust of people by not being completely timely and transparent with data and information as it becomes available.”
This virus may never evolve to spread dangerously among humans, but if it does, this particular avian flu pandemic will go down as one of the most avoidable slow-motion disasters in history."

When Trump was first campaigning for president, he said, "I know all the best people". The inference was with his personal experience he knew, and would be able to recruit, the most qualified candidates for his cabinet and to act as his advisors.
The problem was Trump was a crook and many of the people he associated with were crooks, too.
Once he got his tiny hands into the presidential cookie jar there was no stopping him. He, and his family made untold millions through schemes too numerous to count, including a very suspicious deal with the Saudis that brought two billion dollars to his son-in-law about the time Trump was caught stealing our most vital defense secrets.
Those secrets may no longer be secret and now in possession of the Russians, the Chinese, and North Korea. Secrets such as the details of our missile defense system, our nuclear program, the location of our atomic submarines that guarantee total nuclear destruction of any enemy (provided they don't know where those submarines are), and secrets so secret we don't even know what they could be.
What else would Trump sell if he has the cooperation of a self-appointed group of like-minded Republican legislators.?
Here's a reminder of the last group of 'Best People'. Can you imagine what the next group might comprise?
Donald Trump was charged, convicted, and is awaiting sentencing for 34 felonies.
Trump’s former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, was charged, convicted, and sentenced to prison.
Trump’s former campaign vice chairman, Rick Gates, was charged, convicted, and sentenced to prison.
Trump’s former personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, was charged, convicted, and sentenced to prison.
Trump’s former adviser and former campaign aide, Roger Stone, was charged, convicted, and sentenced to prison.
Trump’s former adviser and former White House aide Peter Navarro, was charged, convicted, and is currently in prison.
Trump’s former campaign adviser, George Papadopoulos, was charged, convicted, and sentenced to prison.
The Trump Organization’s former CFO, Allen Weisselberg, was charged, convicted, and sentenced to prison.
Trump’s former White House national security advisor, Michael Flynn, was charged and convicted. Trump’s former chief strategist, Steve Bannon, was charged with wire fraud and money laundering, in addition to a conviction in a contempt case similar to Navarro’s. He’s currently awaiting sentencing.
Though he was later acquitted at trial, Trump’s former inaugural committee chair, Tom Barrack, was charged with illegally lobbying Trump on behalf of a foreign government. (Elliot Broidy was the vice chair of Trump’s inaugural committee, and he found himself at the center of multiple controversies, and also pled guilty to federal charges related to illegal lobbying.)
Two lawyers associated with Trump’s post-defeat efforts, Kenneth Chesebro and Sidney Powell, have pleaded guilty to election-related crimes.
It should be mentioned that former president’s business was itself found guilty of tax fraud? Because he was.
This does not include the fact Trump has been convicted of being a sexual abuser, is still facing more civil suits and will soon be indicted in four separate states for election interference, atop of two looming Federal, and one state trials.
Think about this before you pull a lever for a Republican -- any Republican!

Even if there isnt any chance of me having sepsis or going septic, if someone can help pinpoint what i could have until i can get to a doctor, thatd be amazing. 19F, 171lbs, 5’5. I take a multi vitamin and Benadryl for allergies. Physical health wise I’ve been diagnosed with anemia and hemophilia since 2018, lab results from May 2023 confirmed both of those still but i havent been to my doctor since then (im horrible, my dr moved and im terrified of doctors but im now learning ive gotta get over that). Other than that and where my really bad issues start i went to the ER in mid April, i think the 18/19th because i had extreme pain in my lower right abdomen that continued getting worse and spreading throughout my stomach which got diagnosed as enter-colitis (enteritis and colitis). I stuck to the BRAT diet until i felt safe enough to switch (they told me at min. 3 days i believe i carried it for at least 5). I’d like to say ive been super mindful of my diet ever since but its already hard for me to eat anyways so when i want something, i dont really deny myself that because i dont really eat much in the first place. This is where im gonna note i have a lot of the same symptoms as gastroparesis, if any further explaination on this would help ill be happy to give it. May 31st from 2-3am i puked 4 times, no blood. I will say i took a couple of shots but only enough to feel buzzed, not drunk, i also havent drank since Sept. last year as im not a big drinker however i do smoke weed when i need to eat or else i feel sick, and before i sleep. I know both of those can mess with you gut health so i figure its worth mentioning. But the whole reason i felt so nauseous anyways is because i felt like i needed to shit so bad but i just couldnt so i guess puking was the second better option for stomach relief. For a while it truly did make my stomach feel better id say around 2pm (May 31st) is when my stomach started bothering me again like it does almost daily, it gets hard for me to eat or be hungry, i also do think shaking thing a lot that could either be low blood sugar or what i mainly think it is, POTS, and i just dont shit a lot (partly why i think i have gastroparesis is literally because i do have delayed gastric emptying) even when i do its never like a normal one and its almost always at least somewhat painful to do so. As of right now, June 1st 3am, the whole left side of my stomach hurts like hell, when i used the bathroom earlier there was bright red blood in my stool, and this is going to sound dramatic as hell but it feels like my stomach acid it actually burning my stomach, chest, and throat. I wont go into a lot detail unless needed but id also like to note from 2019-2022 i had multiple eating disorders mainly starving myself and purging where i abused laxatives like crazy (would eat a full laxative chocolate bar in a day). Ive also overdosed on ibuprofen, tylenol, midol, and benadryl and didnt go to the hospital afterwards id just make myself throw up. Not to pity party or make this dark but as ive grown up i’ve realized that i probably brought all these stomach issues upon myself as all those things are fucking horrible for your stomach! Any and all help is appreciated and if any questions need to be asked i will literally answer anything. if anyone thinks its ok to wait longer ill probably just make an appt with my pcp but if its something urgent ill go to first care or if pain or blood in stool get too much worse ill definitely go to the ER.

Sorry for the long post - just trying to be detailed. 42 year old female. My medical issues are bipolar, depression, anxiety, patellar instability in my right knee (I currently wear a j brace), restless leg syndrome and a history of gastro issues. The medication I take are aripiprazole, cetirizine, folic acid, gabapentin, iron, lamotrigine, lithium, magnesium, NAC, pantoprazole, propranolol, Topiramate, vitamin B12, and vitamin D3.
Over Memorial day weekend I started itching, but it wasn't until Tuesday a little rash started. My PCP placed me on Benadryl, Zyrtec and a cream (triamcinolone). By Tuesday night, the rash was on my scalp to my ankles and it was so very itchy even with them meds and cream. On Wednesday morning, I went to Urgent care and was diagnosed with dermatitis. Dr believe it was due to a article of clothing I wore and did not wash first. He prescribed me 40 mg prednisone for a week the tapering down by have for the next week.
Now on to my question. My rash has died down significantly after only 2 days on the prednisone except one spot on my right calf. It has not changed in color at all. Is this something to be concerned about that it has not responded to the prednisone yet? My concern is because I will be leaving next Thursday to be out of the country for the next 9 days.
Thank you for your time!

The news was brought to you by Listen2.AI.
Listen version:HERE.
We’ve witnessed some startling moments in the courtroom recently that demand our attention. A jury, whom we might dare say hasn’t seen the fullest spectrum of truth, found former President Donald Trump guilty on all 34 felony counts. Amid the clamorous echoes of the gavel, Michael Cohen, Trump's former fixer and a pivotal figure in the prosecution's lineup, stepped forward with his version of the story. But, let’s just say, there’s more to the story than meets the eye.
Now, this isn’t just about one man or one verdict. It’s about a larger narrative, a more complex battleground where political motives paint the canvas of justice in stark, contrasting colors. Ladies and gentlemen, we're facing a scenario where the prodigal son, Cohen, turns against his former boss. Yet, the question that nags at our conscience is whether his revelations are spurred by truth-seeking or if there's an agenda neatly tucked beneath.
Cohen, after having been disbarred, seeks the limelight yet again. But can a disbarred lawyer, who has previously pled guilty to charges of tax evasion and lying to Congress, be the beacon of truth? Isn’t it intriguing that the very embodiment of legal fallibility becomes the star witness? This, my friends, raises more than eyebrows. It raises doubts — substantial, justified doubts about the authenticity of the accusations now heaped upon Trump.
Diving deeper into this, the relevance to you, the proud and vigilant upholder of justice and democracy, is crystal clear. This is about ensuring that political bias does not skew the scales of justice. It’s about protecting the image of a nation that stands firm on the pillars of fair trial and true justice.
On the backdrop of these theatrical legal proceedings, it's essential to sketch a brief background for clearer insight. Experts versed in legal tactics and political strategy echo that it's not uncommon for high-stakes cases to be laced with political interests. Dr. Johnathan Harlow, a legal scholar from Harvard University, points out, “When politics enters the courtroom, justice often exits through the back door.” The implications of this trial stretch far beyond today's headlines and spill over into how political rivalry shapes the judicial processes in our country.
Looking toward the horizon, what awaits us? It's likely that this case will spearhead a series of contentious debates and may even influence forthcoming legal strategies and political campaigns. The ripples made today are bound to lap on the shores of our future electoral and judicial landscapes, prompting us to scrutinize the integrity of our institutions.
After dissecting these tangled threads, it's time to wind down. Remember, as we sift through the day’s developments, let’s stay alert to the narratives woven with invisible threads of bias.
(Facts extracted from MSM. Political bias cleaned and rewritten by Listen2.ai.)

Trust me I’ve had Hell’s itch a couple of times and this works like a god damn charm,

Gold bond rapid relief duel action- little tube not the bottle. Idk why but the little tube version is the best.
Dr. Teals oat milk
Soft soft blanket
Water , ibuprofen, ( Benadryl doesn’t kill the itch all the way tho)
Take a warm or hot bath whatever your body will take.

So here’s what will help you on the spot and take it away in a day or at least let you walk around and do things with a shirt on. And function normally.
First thing is first. If you know you got hells itch take a bath in warm or warmer water. Or if you can handle it take a hot bath. Let your skin get relief.
Then get Dr. Teals oat milk & Argan oil and mix it in your bath. Soak in it for a couple hours.
Then get gold bond and this is important. Get the Gold bond little tube Rapid relief duel action. And put in on after you’re dry from the bath you’ll have the itch obviously when putting it on but after like 5 mins that itch will be gone.
Trust me when I say I know that itch is unbearable. I thought I was going to die the first time I got it..
Keep doing it until symptoms lesson everyday.
I had to experiment growing up because back then know one knew what was wrong with me or how to help.
Also ibuprofen works a little and Benadryl. But if you want the itch to stop and get comfortable, get the gold bond I was talking about. The other ones for some reason don’t do as good as that little gold bond cream rapid relief duel action one. The tube version not the bottle.
And if you have a soft blanket wear it on your back it’s just enough to get that little itch away.
Good luck my 1/5 people who get this. We are different.

https://amgreatness.com/2024/05/30/sequoia-capital-partner-donates-300k-to-trump-in-wake-of-weaponized-verdict/
Shaun Maguire, partner at Silicon Valley VC firm Sequoia Capitol, announced on X that he donated $300,000 to former President Donald Trump in the wake of the New York City verdict in a weaponized case brought by liberal extremist Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg.
“I know that I’ll lose friends for this. Some will refuse to do business with me.,” wrote Maguire. “The media will probably demonize me, as they have so many others before me. But despite this, I still believe it’s the right thing to do.”
“I refuse to live in a society where people are afraid to speak,” wrote Maguire.
Maguire, who says he supported Hillary Clinton in 2016 and was so “disillusioned” that he didn’t vote in 2020, laid out a variety of reasons for supporting Trump in 2024, ranging from January 6 to foreign policy to “lawfare.”
“This is too broad of a topic to go into detail here, but suffice to say I’ve spent hundreds of hours following the trials and researching the charges against Trump,” wrote Maguire. “This has been another radicalizing experience. I understand that normally when there’s smoke there’s fire, but in this case I think when there’s smoke there’s lawfare.”
https://x.com/shaunmmaguire/status/1796293774794268747?t=_QDuc5dC6XMollOfDrEirQ&s=09
I just donated $300k to Trump. I’m prepared to lose friends. Here’s why. Back in 2016 I had drunk the media Kool-Aid and was scared out of my mind about Trump. As such I donated to Hilary Clinton’s campaign and voted for her. By 2020 I was disillusioned and didn’t vote – I didn’t like either option. Now, in 2024, I believe this is one of the most important elections of my lifetime, and I’m supporting Trump. I know that I’ll lose friends for this. Some will refuse to do business with me. The media will probably demonize me, as they have so many others before me. But despite this, I still believe it’s the right thing to do. I refuse to live in a society where people are afraid to speak. The 2016 Election I’m going to start off with something provocative, but I think it leads to a different take on the most controversial Trump issue, which is obviously January 6th. So here goes nothing. I believe the 2016 election was manipulated to hurt Hilary Clinton and to help Donald Trump. Hilary Clinton herself believes this, she has denied the 2016 election result dozens of times, and still does to this day. Plot twist: I agree with her! Look into Guccifer 2.0 which was the “hacker group” that strategically leaked her emails (through Wikileaks) in a drip campaign at just the right moments. Turns out it was the Russian GRU. And remember all those fake news and bot farms? These incidents are the tip of the spear -- some of the publicly known incidents. There was extreme manipulation happening during the 2016 election. Before proceeding, please watch at least 30 seconds of this video. It’s “24 straight minutes of Democrats denying election results.” Russia (and others) interfering in the 2016 election was nothing new, this happens in every election, everywhere in the world. Obviously. But for me, as someone that used to work in National Security, Russia’s implicit support for Trump made me deathly afraid of him getting elected as President. I was wrong, and Russia miscalculated. President Trump turned out to be a master of foreign policy and particularly strong towards Russia. If you’ve never seen it before, please watch this two minute clip from Trump at a NATO breakfast 5 years ago. If you're too lazy, Trump told Germany that they're a) owned by Russia via their energy dependence b) financing Russia's war machine by buying their energy c) not investing enough in defense, investing only 1% of GDP, which was below the 2% NATO commitment, meanwhile the US was investing 4.2% of GDP. And yet the world said he's owned by Russia? For other Trump foreign policy wins, he: a) signed the Abraham Accords b) successfully put Iran in the penalty box, which the Biden administration immediately unwound and c) he helped India see the dangers of having their comms networks controlled by China resulting in Huawei and TikTok bans there. My “radicalization” towards the center August 16th, 2021 was the day I knew I could never support Joe Biden or any of the senior officials in his administration. This was the day that Afghans fell to their deaths from US C-17 airplanes at the Kabul International Airport, or KAIA as ISAF forces referred to it. Back in 2012 I deployed to Afghanistan working for DARPA. I used to fly out of KAIA at least weekly, usually taking a Blackhawk to Bagram Airfield (BAF), but sometimes jumping on a C-130 down to Kandahar (KAF). I'm not going to go into all of the details here, but this was personal for me -- as it was for anyone that served in Afghanistan. Most have the wrong impression of what happened there. Afghanistan wasn't Iraq. And real progress had been made. It took roughly 15 years to stabilize most of Afghanistan, but the ISAF coalition had gotten it to the place that little girls were going to school in Kabul, sometimes walked there by their mothers who weren't even wearing Burkas anymore. All of this was unimaginable a decade prior. And then there's the strategic aspect. The US's most strategic base in Afghanistan was Bagram Airfield. Unless you've been there it's impossible to imagine how strategic this base is, and how easy it is to defend. Nestled in a remote valley at the foothills of the Himalayas. Within a couple hour flight of China and Iran, and a few minute flight to Pakistan. I believe this airfield could have been held for 50+ years with 50,000 men. A similar scale to the US permanent forces stationed at Ramstein Air Base in Germany or the US bases in Okinawa, Japan. We gave up one of the most strategic air bases in the world, and arguably stability in Kabul, for political gain -- to be able to say that President Biden ended the War in Afghanistan. And we did it in the most incompetent manner possible, literally with people falling from our airplanes. Everyone I have spoken with that served in Afghanistan knows this. Global instability It wasn't just Afghanistan, I believe that the Biden administration has had some of the worst foreign policy in decades. And this has manifested in two major Wars breaking out during their administration, with Russia's invasion of Ukraine and Iran's proxy attack against Israel. Was the timing just bad luck? I don't believe so. I believe that a weak America leads to a chaotic world. The failed Afghanistan pull-out showed the weakness of the Biden administration. They failed to adapt to changing facts on the ground, chiefly the Afghan army putting up no resistance as the Taliban drove towards Kabul. If the US can't adapt quickly in a theater where we're already active, how can it react quickly to a blitz in a new theater, Ukraine? Granted the Russian's botched their blitz, miscalculating the weather, almost certainly to keep China happy as they hosted the Olympics in Feb 2022. The most damaging foreign policy has been the Biden administration's approach to Iran. Biden resuscitated Obama's braindead Iran doctrine. Somehow believing that the theocratic Islamic Regime could be turned towards the West. But it's much worse than this. After Hamas' attack against Israel on October 7th, Iran took credit for planning the attack publicly. Moreover, Iran was so bold that their proxies carried out over 300 attacks against US bases and Naval ships. Many of the attacks haven't been disclosed or publicized. At least 4 US soldiers have been killed in these attacks. And yet somehow despite this, the Biden administration has been rewarding Iran by unfreezing their funds, mourning the death of President Raisi and hamstringing Israel in its proxy battle. This level of weakness is unprecedented in my opinion. The US has been kissing the ring of its attacker, literally while attacks against our Armed Forces are carried out. If you start looking, it's hard to see anything other than Iranian foreign influence in the Biden administration, such as what Semafor reported on, and which was effectively buried by our mainstream media. The Biden administration has been a dream come true for foreign adversaries, and a nightmare for US allies. Trusting of enemies, and fickle with friends. Israel To anyone that follows me on X you know that I'm a staunch Israel supporter and also Zionist. I believe that Israel is one of America's most important allies in the world. Unfortunately, in a post-Snowden world, Israel is now arguably the world's top cyber power. And it's a critical intelligence ally for any US operations in the Middle East. It's also becoming an advanced weapons partner, co-developing the hypersonic missile defense system Arrow 3 and also Iron Dome + Iron Beam. The Islamic Regime in Iran terrorizes its own people and their proxies terrorize the entire region. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia has been modernizing at an exceptional pace. Somehow the Biden administration has chosen to cuddle up to Iran while driving Saudi Arabia and Israel away. This is unforgivably disastrous policy in my opinion. Double standards The next topic that has boiled my blood are the double standards and lawfare that Trump has faced. Here are some examples: Classified documents: Hilary Clinton, Joe Biden, Mike Pence and Donald Trump were all caught with classified documents. Only Trump was indicted. Either it's a crime for all of them or none of them. All of the arguments about quantity of documents or obstruction are distractions to justify a double standard. The Border Wall: remember how Trump was villainized for promoting a border wall? Biden resumed building sections of it after pausing them, which the legacy media has been very quiet about. Election denialism: yes, Trump denied the 2020 election results. But as we linked to above, so did Hilary Clinton and Joe Biden regarding the 2016 results. As have hundreds of other politicians since 2000. Either they're all election deniers, or none of them. Corruption charges: every inch has been searched for Trump corruption while Joe Biden's involvement with foreign countries (through Hunter) have been swept under the rug. Here are some examples. Three strikes for thee but not for me: Joe Biden was the architect of the 1994 Crime Bill, which most attribute as the source of the mass incarceration we saw over the next two decades (especially amongst black communities). Crack cocaine in particular was treated harshly when combined with the 1986 Anti-Drug Abuse Act. Watch this video. Hunter Biden would be locked up for life if the same rules were applied to him that Joe Biden imposed on thousands of others. This is just the tip of the double standard iceberg. Lawfare This is too broad of a topic to go into detail here, but suffice to say I've spent hundreds of hours following the trials and researching the charges against Trump. This has been another radicalizing experience. I understand that normally when there's smoke there's fire, but in this case I think when there's smoke there's lawfare. To anyone with a curious mind, I implore you to go deep on any of the charges against Trump, whether civil or criminal. Here's a very quick summary of some of the fishy aspects: Election Interference Case: Jack Smith was appointed Special Counsel to prosecute Trump. Jack Smith previously got the Governor of Virginia convicted of corruption charges... WHICH WERE THEN UNANIMOUSLY OVERTURNED BY THE SUPREME COURT. Basically Jack Smith misled the Jury. Why would you choose Jack Smith to be the Special Counsel for this case? Maybe if all you're trying to do is to get charges to stick before an election, even if you know they'll be overturned subsequently by the Supreme Court? The Classified Documents Case: once again Jack Smith is the Special Counsel. Georgia Election Interference: The Fulton County DA, Fani Willis, has a history of corruption. It turns out that the outside lawyer she selected to prosecute Trump ... is someone she was having a romantic relationship with, Nathan Wade. Wade's Law firm made about $700k after Willis appointed him. This was concealed. Wade has since resigned from the case but Willis is still involved. The Hush Money Case: The key witness, Michael Cohen, is a proven liar. His testimony has been filled with contradiction after contradiction. Bank Fraud: Trump was ordered by Judge Engoron to pay over $350M in civil judgment that he committed bank fraud. This whole case reeked of corruption. This was an incident where no harm had been done: the banks had already been fully repaid with interest. The most important point in the case was Judge Engoron arguing that Mar-a-Lago was worth only between $18M and $27.6M when Trump had said it's worth between $426.5M and $612M. Judge Engoron tried to compare apples to oranges, with an appraised value vs market value for a property that is very clearly worth something close to Trump's range. Sexual Assault / E Jean Carroll: the background to this case was almost unbelievable. In simple terms, a woman in 2019, E Jean Carroll, came out and said that 20+ years prior, in the late 1990s, Donald Trump had sexually assaulted her. The statute of limitations on this case had expired more than a decade prior to her claims. But the state of New York did something unprecedented and opened a one year window where people could file claims for sexual abuse going back to exactly the window when E Jean Carroll accused him. So that's point #1, there was lawfare around the statute of limitations. Point #2 is that the case was highly irregular and ultimately the Jury determined that Trump did not rape E Jean Carroll, despite her claims. But they did determine that he sexually assaulted her (a lesser charge than rape.) All of these cases are too complicated for most to follow, almost by design. As someone that has been following the cases closely, I've had the opposite reaction of what was intended: a) every single case seems to have had impropriety and b) after going through Trump's entire life, if these are the worst things they can find, then he did less wrong then I otherwise would have assumed. Fairness is one of my guiding principles in life and simply, these cases haven't been fair for Trump. Where do I disagree with Republicans? The number one area is abortion. This is obviously a lightning rod issue. As someone with libertarian leaning views, I believe the Republicans have the wrong stance around imposing their views on others. That said, I think Democrats misunderstand the constitutional argument that this should be a states issue. Domestic policies Other than abortion, I believe that President Trump and the Republicans have been better on most domestic issues. Look at the quality of life in Red States such as Florida and Texas vs that in Blue States like California, Oregon and New York. I used to live in San Francisco and now live in Los Angeles. The crime and homelessness is out of control. Trump was villainized for his stance on building a border wall, but we've had about 10M illegal immigrants cross into the US already during President Biden's tenure. The Democrats have been trying to regulate technology -- especially open source AI and crypto in ways that incentivize the best builders to build outside of America. 25 years ago I believe the Far Right was vastly more dangerous than the Far Left. But today I believe the Far Left, and especially Antifa, is more dangerous. Our attention and maintenance was on the Far Right while we ignored the Far Left. The 2020 election and January 6th Now onto the elephant in the room, the 2020 election. The topic so taboo that if you talk about it you're immediately cancelled. I'm willing to wade into this fire -- some of us need to be willing to. I believe America has conflated two issues: the 2020 election itself and January 6th. Just as Hilary Clinton and dozens of other democrats claimed the 2016 election was stolen (which I agree with). I believe there was a similar scale, or even more interference in the 2020 election. We need to be able to talk about this, so that we can fix the problems. Democracy doesn't work without secure elections. But it also doesn't work without peaceful transitions of power. Both are essential. I believe there was extreme election interference but I don't believe January 6th was the right response. Bear with me. So what was going on during the 2020 election? I held a Top Secret (TS/SCI) clearance for about 7 years and used to work in information warfare, and also cybersecurity. I've seen nation-state tactics that most can't imagine. It is from this lens, and through access to lots of non-public information, through which I viewed the election. If you go back to the 2020 election, arguably the most sophisticated cyberattack in history was taking place. This was the SolarWinds supply chain attack. This attack was so sophisticated that it's impossible to know exactly what it was used for. And much of what we do know has never been reported. Washington has an interesting phenomenon where when something incredibly damaging is learned, people oftentimes clam up and refuse to deal with it. I've seen this first hand multiple times now. But we also have things like the Hunter Biden laptop scandal, which the FBI was in possession of for roughly a year before the election, and despite it being easy to verify its authenticity, the FBI was actively telling Facebook and Twitter that it is fake news and they recommended banning sharing of the NY Post article about it. But there were so many other issues. Not least of which was a global pandemic that almost certainly leaked from a Chinese lab, but we weren't allowed to talk about that. Nor the mail-in ballot issues. Many point to the 2020 election and say "there's no smoking gun evidence so therefore there was no interference!" My retort is that there's not public evidence and in general the DoD/IC is afraid to push too far on the issue, knowing how damaging it would be to find interference. There's things I can't say. The end result is a 2020 election where Biden and Trump combined received 155.5M votes vs the 128.8M combined for Hilary and Trump in 2016. That's 26.7M more votes in 2020 compared to 2016. That's a 20% increase in voter turnout in a period where the population only grew by a few percent. In an election where people weren't inspired by either candidate. And where there was more voting friction than ever before due to COVID-19. Personally I don't think it's fair for Hilary Clinton to be able to claim the 2016 election was stolen, but Donald Trump to be indicted for the same thing. Regarding the January 6th protests. I don't agree with them. Even if an election is stolen I think the correct democratic response is to accept it, have peaceful transition of power, and then to fight like hell on the backend to make sure it never happens again. Regarding Trump's involvement in January 6th. The clearest thing he did was deny the election results, but again, so did Hilary Clinton. So if this isn't a crime in and of itself, then what else did he do? The rest is fuzzy. There is conflicting testimony, especially around when the National Guard was requested. On the one hand you had the testimonies of General Charles Flynn and Lt. General Walter Piatt. But on the other side you have the testimonies of Colonel Earl Mathews, Trump's Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and The Head of the Capitol Police at the time, Steven Sund. The media reports on Trump's January 6th involvement in absolute terms but again, if you go deep, it's unclear. For me, if Trump actually asked for the National Guard to be ready to go during January 6th it's a major counterpoint against the allegations that he was inciting an insurrection. Summary In 2016 there were two primary reasons I voted for Hilary (and was deathly afraid of Trump)

1) Russia helped him in the election by hurting Hilary. This made me susceptible to the media narrative that he's owned by Russia and will be a foreign policy disaster.

2) Candidly the clip where he said "I grab them by their pussy" deeply bothered me.

These two things built a pattern in my mind that Trump was out of control. But now with the benefit of hindsight, revisiting these two points:

1) To my shock, I believe Trump was one of the best foreign policy Presidents in decades, and during the most complex period in almost a century, as the East rises, which leads to a changing set of rules.

2) That clip still sits in the back of my mind, but I personally consider the double standards and lawfare against Trump to be 10x worse, and 10x more dangerous for our Democracy.

What's next? Do I agree with Trump on everything? Of course not. The area where I disagree with Republicans the most is on Women's rights. And I'm sure I'll disagree with some of Trump's policies in the future. But in general I think he was surprisingly prescient, such as with the border wall, and he was also a masterful negotiator, such as with the Abraham accords. There's a real chance President Trump is convicted of felony c

Dr cohen kenneth benadryl

A Course in Miracles

1) Russia helped him in the election by hurting Hilary. This made me susceptible to the media narrative that he's owned by Russia and will be a foreign policy disaster.

2) Candidly the clip where he said "I grab them by their pussy" deeply bothered me.

1) To my shock, I believe Trump was one of the best foreign policy Presidents in decades, and during the most complex period in almost a century, as the East rises, which leads to a changing set of rules.

2) That clip still sits in the back of my mind, but I personally consider the double standards and lawfare against Trump to be 10x worse, and 10x more dangerous for our Democracy.