How to simplify fractions with variables

Stellar

2011.12.24 21:04 blitz0x Stellar

Stellar is a decentralized protocol that enables you to send money to anyone in the world, for fractions of a penny, instantly, and in any currency. Stellar is for news, announcements and open-discussion related to Stellar and its community. Stellar is not officially maintained or moderated by the Stellar Development Foundation.
[link]


2010.08.11 18:28 brodie7838 Tasker: Total Automation for Android

[link]


2016.04.07 05:41 PositivityPost The Awesome Power of Positive Thinking

Your source for practical articles and news about Positive Thinking, simplifying life, reducing stress, finding inspiration, personal growth, personal finance and happiness.
[link]


2024.05.19 22:02 Signal-Promotion-10 Gamma and Beta functions for JEE Advance

Gamma and Beta functions for JEE Advance
Its been a while since I have made any post, but here I am ig
gamma beta functions; as the name suggests are 2 functions that are extensively used in math to solve problems, hence the reason it can be useful for JEE advance is because sometimes approaching the problems through this method can save a lot of time when compared doing it the traditional way.
Gamma functions are in the simplest sense an branched out version of the factorial functions, the gamma of a number n such that n > 0 is:
https://preview.redd.it/vb7ezq6utf1d1.png?width=1192&format=png&auto=webp&s=83d759af2f3755dda5d7d659bc85459798f36f5a
some things that one should know are: i) Γ(1) = 1. ii) Γ(n+1) = nΓ(n). iii) Γ(1/2) = √π iv) Γ(n) = (n-1)! and finally v) Γ(n) Γ(1-n) = π/sin nπ.
fundamentally these ideas mean that when you plug a number such that the number is greater than 0 in the integral for the gamma function, you get the gamma function's value of that number.
examples:
  1. Find Γ(4). sol: Γ(4) = (4-1)! = 3! = 6.
  2. Find Γ(9). sol: Γ(9) = (9-1)! = 8! = 40320
  3. Find Γ(9/2). (for such problems that demand finding the gamma function for a fraction, you need to break down the fraction into two additive parts, take the fraction out, and repeat the process. Once you have broken down the second fraction, take it out again and multiply it with the previous fraction that was outside, continue the process until you are done with the final gamma value).
sol:
Γ(9/2) = Γ(7/2 + 1) = (7/2)Γ(7/2)
Γ(7/2) = (5/2)Γ(5/2)
Γ(5/2) = (3/2)Γ(3/2)
Γ(3/2) = (1/2)Γ(1/2)
We know that Γ(1/2) = √π, so:
Γ(9/2) = (7/2)(5/2)(3/2)(1/2)√π
= (7 * 5 * 3 * 1 * √π) / 2^4 = 105√π / 16
Beta functions:
just like gamma functions, beta functions are powerful mathematical tools extensively used to solve various problems the reason we learn this is yet again the same reason that we do gamma functions "from their ability to simplify complex calculations, often saving significant time compared to traditional methods" at least when we are speaking in the JEE domain
beta function is given as B(x,y), is defined for two positive numbers x and y, it also converges when the x and y are, x>0 and y>0:
https://preview.redd.it/l2snpwlurf1d1.png?width=1658&format=png&auto=webp&s=e5152529b4c509df15676fbc10d316e00247dfb4
just like the gamma function properties, there are some forms of beta function that one should know (these are the basic forms of beta function for gaining insights on the other forms pls refer to https://dlmf.nist.gov/5.12)
i) B(m,n) = Γ(m)Γ(n)/Γ(m+n). ii) B(m,n) = B(n,m)
beta function can also be expressed in another form of integral (it is called Reduction Formula):
Reduction formula (a form of expressing beta function)
examples:
  1. Find B(4,2). sol: Γ(4)Γ(2)/Γ(4+2) = 1/20
  2. Find B(3.5). sol: Γ(3)Γ(5)/Γ(3+5) = 1/105
  3. Find B(1/2, 1/2). sol: Γ(1/2)Γ(1/2)/Γ(1/2+1/2) = π
Solving Integrals with Gamma-Beta functions:
now that you have a basic understanding of these functions, you would want to apply them in your integrals, but remember gamma-beta functions are applicable for problems that appear in their format, most of the time when questions are not given in the form of gamma-beta function; then you evaluate the traditionally, but when you find integrals that can be expressed as gamma-beta function. then you should go with this method.
here is an example problem of how you could do it in case the question is in the form of the gamma-beta function:
Solve the following problem.
Sol: looking at this integral, we can trace it with the reduction formula that we just learned a while ago, and we know that the reduction formula is a form of beta function. as we notice this integral. we can see that in the numerator for "m-1" in the reduction formula, it's given as 2 in the question. if we equate this:
m-1 = 2, m = 3.
and if we repeat this process in the denominator the reduction formula has "m+n" and we trace this with the question and equate it:
m+n = 5, (m=3). hence 3+n = 5 and therefore n = 2.
Now we have the values for m and n, hence we have B(m,n) as B(3,2). now solve B(3,2) and we get the answer of this integral as:
1/12.
this was just a trivial example showcasing how to use gamma-beta functions to solve integrals.
here are some JEE PYQs that can be solved by using the Gamma-beta function:
JEE Advance 2014 - Paper 2. Q53 and Q54:
https://preview.redd.it/7f6zpz37vf1d1.png?width=843&format=png&auto=webp&s=c1569a2eba104da49fab49f286f4a8b48d774c4a
JEE Advance 2014 - Paper 1. Q55:
Integer Type problem
submitted by Signal-Promotion-10 to u/Signal-Promotion-10 [link] [comments]


2024.05.19 16:50 Infinite_Scallion_24 Observability and repeatability, as well as other YEC misrepresentations of science

I think one of the worst things that you see a lot of the big YEC speakers do is the misrepresentation of science and the scientific method. It's one thing to argue with the evidence, this I accept as it is at least an attempt to engage in actual scientific discourse (excluding those who just baselessly decry the science). Even Tomkins with his apparent inability to do genomics is at the very least attempting to perform scientific experiments. However, these attempts to re-define science in a way that is beneficial to a creationist agenda is insanely frustrating, since it totally ruins all form of good-faith debate, and heavily misinforms people without a scientific education, and who don't really know how scientific process takes place.
To bring this point to light - I'm going to discuss this article from AIG: https://answersingenesis.org/what-is-science/what-is-science/. It displays basically all of these claims, and I consider it to contain some of the worst of AIG's mental gymnastics.
The article opens with a spiel about how science originated in Christian Europe, and refer to how Johannes Kepler, Francis Bacon, Isaac Newton and Galileo Galilei were all Christians who believed in a young Earth. Funnily enough, However - they fail to mention that Galileo was arrested by Christians due to his ideas contradicting a literal interpretation of the Bible - that being geostaticism (the idea that the Earth is stationary). I wonder why they excluded this piece of information?
They also state that "If the universe is a product of random chance or a group of gods that interfere in the universe, there is really no reason to expect order in nature". I could probably write an entire post on why this statement is false, so I won't go into this here. Maybe I'll do a follow up to this one just about this idea.
Now comes one of AIG's points that annoys me to no end - the ideas of 'Operational Science' and 'Historical Science'. AIG frames these terms as such:
Operational: "deals with testing and verifying ideas in the present and leads to the production of useful products like computers, cars, and satellites."
Historical: "involves interpreting evidence from the past and includes the models of evolution and special creation."
These terms do not exist in actual academia. They only exist within AIG's fantasy science land where they decide the rules, so that they can lend a fraction of legitimacy to their outdated ideas. The main reason they do this is to boil the argument down to one of faith. 'Evolutionism' vs Creationism is just a debate between two religions - same as Muslims and Christians arguing over which god is the real one. They present this in a slightly different way, but the meaning is the same: "The argument is not over the evidence—the evidence is the same—it is over the way the evidence should be interpreted." Essentially, 'we have different interpretations of the same stuff, so it's a matter of faith'.
What AIG are doing here is creating an unnecessary distinction. The worst bit is the reference to 'evidence from the past'. What they really mean here are things like the fossil record, radiometric dating, the geologic column - all the things that completely and utterly gut their belief in a 6000 year old created Earth. Instead of addressing them, they claim that it's a matter of interpretation.
Actual science doesn't create this distinction. Its purpose is to provide us with a method that lets us explain things we cannot observe directly, by looking at the things we can observe. No human has ever seen an atom with their own eyes - they are too small. Instead, we used observable evidence to figure out their structure, such as Rutherford's alpha particle scattering experiment - showing how most of the gold foil he was shooting the particles at allowed them to pass through, implying atoms being mostly empty space. Now Rutherford never saw an atom, but he inferred this about them through observation, as well as repetition of an experiment to minimise error. This is how science works. Of course, AIG would call Rutherford's work 'Operational Science', so we'll have to go somewhere else.
Let's use murder as an analogy (jolly, I know) - a person was killed 3 days ago, and their body was just discovered: we never saw them die, and we can never repeat their murder - because they are dead (truly groundbreaking stuff here). However, there is a gash across their neck, and a bloodied knife sat next to them. Moreover, this knife is covered with a person's fingerprints. We can then go to the house of the person who these fingerprints match, and ask them if they know anything - which they deny, despite lacking any alibi and having a definite motive. Do we have enough evidence to determine how the person died, as well as who killed them? Absolutely we do - there's a gash, and a knife covered in blood that matches the victim's: conclusion, they were killed with that knife. The knife is covered with fingerprints that lead to a person with no alibi at all, and a good motive: conclusion, they're the murderer. Now all of these data are from the past - the blood was put on the knife in the past, the wound was made in the past, the fingerprints were put on the knife in the past - by all metrics, this murder case falls into AIG's 'Historical Science'. As such, convicting this person is simply a matter of interpretation. We can only interpret that the fingerprints perfectly match those of the suspect. Who are we to say that they didn't somehow change over time? See how nonsensical this distinction is?
AIG then go on to the subject of theories - and again, they separated 'operational theories' from 'historical theories'. The idea is pretty much the same as discussed above, though there are a few points that I want to address. Firstly, they don't do the thing that I see many creationists (and other science deniers) state - that being the 'it's just a theory' thing, and draw a distinction between the colloquial and scientific definitions, though not without the prerequisite 'Evolutionists claim' line. This point has been beaten into the ground already, so I'll just leave it at that.
They go on to discuss how biological evolution is not an 'operational theory' as it contains 'interpretations of past events' and is 'not as well founded as testable scientific theories like Einstein’s Theory of Relativity or Newton’s Theory of Gravity'. It seems that AIG don't know that while Newton's law of universal gravitation remains as a very well-substantiated piece of science, his actual mechanism for how gravity works was in fact supplanted by Einstein's theory. Good scientific knowledge from AIG, as always. The big part of this section is how they refer to predictability as a method of validating a scientific theory: "These theories offer predictable models and the ability to conduct experiments to determine their validity in different circumstances." Once again, they conveniently omit the immense predictive power of evolutionary theory, instead choosing to claim that it lacks such a property - even going as far to directly claim "Molecules-to-man evolution does not offer this opportunity because these events happened in the past", once again ignoring that one of the key tenets of evolutionary theory is that it both has happened, and is currently happening - considering that we've observed speciation events occurring in the wild: https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0911761106; https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(09)01925-301925-3); https://evolution.berkeley.edu/evo-news/speciation-in-real-time/. The predictive power of evolution is immense, and we are only getting better at making evolutionary predictions as science progresses:
https://ncse.ngo/predictive-power-evolutionary-biology-and-discovery-eusociality-naked-mole-rat,
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9850016/#:~:text=Evolutionary%20predictions%20are%20often%20based,will%20adapt%20to%20their%20environment.
There's also the brief bit where they conflate evolution and abiogenesis "molecules to man evolution". They're two different ideas - and YECs reading this post, stop conflating scientific theories, they are distinct ideas. Evolution deals with how life adapts and develops, it has nothing to do with how life on Earth began - that's abiogenesis. It's the same thing as the Big Bang: it only deals with how the universe formed, not what came before it.
There's a short aside about naturalism, but in order to stop this post turning into a thesis, I'm going to gloss over it and move onto the next bit. Here, AIG describe how "Evolution also relies heavily on the assumption of uniformitarianism— a belief that the present is the key to the past. According to uniformitarians, the processes in the universe have been occurring at a relatively constant rate.". Of course, they fail to consider that, as is the case with all other science, we have evidence to infer that processes do occur at a constant rate. They proceed to discuss rock formation erosion as one of these thing which we assume to have a constant rate - even though I'm pretty sure this is not the case - and that the rate at which these processes takes place is highly variable. To me, this feels like them taking the worst example - and borders on a straw man. Correct me if I'm wrong though - I'm not a geologist, so my understanding is limited here.
I have no doubt that the actual aim of this paragraph is also to sow doubt about other systems reliant upon constant rates of change - such as radiometric dating. Yes, if decay rates were not constant, the values given by radiometric dating would be highly inaccurate, and it would be a useless dating method. However, this would also require a total rewrite of fundamental physics - as the concept of constant nuclear decay rates is backed up by a literal mountain of maths and physical evidence.
However, the Bible makes it very clear that some events of the past were radically different from those we commonly observe today. Noah’s Flood, for example, would have devastated the face of the earth and created a landscape of billions of dead things buried in layers of rock, which is exactly what we see.
Another claim that would take up a post on its own - so I'll skip this and tackle it later. Honestly though, just watch Gutsick Gibbon's stuff on the Genesis flood - she gives a far better explanation than I ever could.
Just as evolutionists weren’t there to see evolution happen over several billion years, neither were creationists there to see the events of the six days of creation. The difference is that creationists have the Creator’s eyewitness account of the events of creation, while evolutionists must create a story to explain origins without the supernatural.
More totally neutral and unbiased claims by AIG, as expected. There is no 'story' being created - scientists observe the (sometimes literal - pun very much intended) mountains of evidence for evolution. The fact that they have to make up a nonsense distinction to split science in two, so that they can put the bits they don't like (Big Bang cosmology, fossils, radiometric dating, geologic column, etc.) in a separate spot to the bits they do like, such as technology and medicine.
Just because many scientists believe the story does not make the story true.
Ironic, considering how much Ken Ham loves to show his lists of creationist scientists. Practice what you preach buddy.
submitted by Infinite_Scallion_24 to DebateEvolution [link] [comments]


2024.05.19 15:25 TheGangstaGandalf Discussion of the Diamond Handbook (Part 1)

Hey everyone, this will be my first attempt at a serious post on this sub. I’m not exactly practiced in articulating my thoughts (I’m more of a fiction writer) so please bear bull with any mistakes and please correct me if I’m wrong. The last thing I want to do is spread misinformation, I’m not an expert (or a financial advisor) on any of this. I'm here to learn, not to teach.
This post will be the first in a series of me reading through the entire Diamond Handbook (2nd) and just commentating on points I find interesting or discussion worthy. I will be asking questions as well as giving my own personal thoughts based on my understanding of the events that have transpired. I became an ape right after the sneeze, and followed a lot of the discussions back then, but have been zen for a while so I haven't fully kept up with a lot of the new developments.
I haven't actually sat down and read DD in a long time, so I decided to give myself a refresher and actually look at the Diamond Handbook (2nd) for the first time. I had read a lot of these posts as they had come out, so I had never felt the need to look at the full PDF before. For the apes that haven’t read it either, I recommend giving it a read. You can find the full DD library in the pinned post of this sub, and the Diamond Handbook is the first one there.
As I have been reading it, I’ve quickly realized that some of the stuff is a little outdated. That can’t really be helped since so much DD has been done between then and now, but this brings me to the two reasons for this post. The Diamond Handbook is likely the first piece of DD a new ape will be recommended; I want to spark discussion to clear up some things that are misguided or outdated in this handbook. The second reason is more of a personal challenge. Whenever someone denies the legitimacy of the DD, an ape usually responds by saying something like “Well, read the DD and prove it wrong”. The average MOASS denier won’t do this though, in my experience they just think it’s ridiculous on a conceptual level, and won’t take the time to actually look through all the DD available and construct a proper debate. I can’t really blame them for this though, spending so much time on something you have no interest in doesn’t sound like a fun time.
But I have a lot of interest in this, and I am an aspiring author who writes 400K word fanfictions for fun. I’ve got the time and the writing willpower. I am very big into trying to understand how a reader will interpret a piece of my writing, so I’ll be looking through that lens and will be writing this with the assumption that you have already read the Diamond Handbook (2nd). Please take the time to respond/correct what I say here, I want to learn.
With all that out of the way, let’s get started.

The Mother of All Short Squeezes (MOASS) Thesis, Published on May 26, 2021, by u(slash)HCMF_MACEFACE
Before we even get into the meat of this section I already see a bit of an issue. A lot of the language implies that MOASS is imminent, take this section for example:
*“If you don't believe me, just look at the chart of GME which our DD (Due Diligence/research/analysis) has been forecasting for a while now. The below pattern has only preceded massive spikes in price, but this time, those on the other side of the trade are going to have a much harder time suppressing the price like they did in January and March. Thanks to the activity on 5/25, we have entered the end-game. The MOASS is beginning.”* 
I think most new apes will look at this, then look at the date of posting (three years ago), and think this is delusional thinking. They will say that MOASS did not ‘begin’ because it hasn’t happened yet. This would be pretty short sighted though, GME has always been a Deep Value investment, long positions are called long for a reason. ‘Buy and HODL’ is such a repeated mantra because that is the investment strategy most apes employ. Like most investments, it takes a long time to realize gains. Your retirement account will be growing for 40+ years before you cash that thing out, GME is my retirement plan so I don’t expect it to be much different.
Just because the sneeze happened in a week doesn’t mean MOASS will, in theory it should be a very long event as both the shorts and longs have a test of wills to see who caves first. However, the sneeze was the ‘beginning’ because it was exposed a lot of the fuckery that is going on in the market right now, I think that is the message that should be taken from this section.
*“These terms are key to understanding the theory and speculated value of a GME investment. Hyperlinks to Investopedia, "the world's leading source of financial content on the web", have been included for most market terms and concepts and it is recommended to check them out if they are not clear. We will be breaking down some of the more complex terms and concepts within the post and framing them within the context of GME.”* 
After the introduction, this post does a great job of explaining all the concepts of the stock market that are relevant to the MOASS thesis. However, I do wish it mentioned some other stock terms for the sake of new investors. Since none of the DD is supposed to be financial advice, I can’t really blame them for these omissions, but at the beginning the OP does say they wanted the post to be good for newer investors, so I think some more pointing in the right direction should’ve been provided. I do appreciate the link to Investopedia, but this DD is already a novel, and the average reader might forget about that link by the time they finish it. So an additional link should’ve been provided at the end.
The two big concepts I see missing are Options and Wash Sales/Stop-Losses.
Options are interesting because they create a different type of buying/selling pressure compared to just buying/selling stocks regularly. There are concepts like gamma ramps and stuff that can be relevant when discussing catalysts for price movement. However, options are pretty scary for most investors, I’ve only ever bought one, and forgot about it so it auto-exercised for me (lol), so it’s not a concept I would call essential. I just think it’s better to be educated than not.
The much more egregious omission is that of Wash Sales and Stop-Losses. Wash Sales are extremely dangerous to new investors who still make decisions based on emotions and are not used to the volatility that comes with GME.
If you are unfamiliar, a Wash Sale is when a person sells a stock at a loss, then buys the stock again within a short period of time. As an example, let’s say you bought a stock at $50, then the stock goes down to $40.00 and you no longer feel comfortable with your investment. You sell the stock at a loss. You lost $10.00 on this transaction, but it’s not all bad. When you go to do your taxes, you can report this $10.00 loss to the IRS. This is good because if you make a $10.00 profit off another trade, you now don’t have to take taxes out of that profit, since the IRS will see this as you breaking even in the grand scheme of your portfolio. You didn’t actually make any money, so they aren’t going to tax you for it.
A Wash Sale is triggered when you buy back the stock you sold in a short period of time, this can even apply if you buy a stock in the same sector. So if you buy a stock at $50.00, sell it at $40.00 then buy it again. That $10.00 loss you took can no longer be reported to the IRS as an actual loss. So when you make $10.00 on some other trade, the IRS won’t see you as breaking even, they will tax you on that $10.00.
For a stock as volatile as GME this can be very dangerous, I know people who brought in the peak, then as the price went back down they triggered a Stop-Loss (auto-sale you can program to trigger when a price falls), only to then buy back in when the stock dropped even lower, creating a wash sale that fucked their taxes.
We say “Buy and HODL” a lot, but I think the ‘why’ of it has been lost in the meme. I personally buy and HODL because averaging down is a lot better for me than accidently triggering a Wash Sale. I fucking hate the IRS and don’t want any of that smoke.
*“SPOILER: GME and \[Popcorn\] have tons of FTDs reported.”* 
I just kinda don’t like the mention of the Popcorn stock here, it has never been a deep value investment. If you are unfamiliar with the Deep Value investment strategy, please take a look at the old Roaring Kitty livestreams. In summary, Deep Value investing is defined by looking for stocks that are extremely undervalued and unpopular due to no fault of the company. These external factors that are making the stock undervalued can be anything, shorting, COVID, stuff like that. But what makes it a Deep Value investment is always strong management within the company. If the company is not mismanaged in any way, then it is very unlikely to go bankrupt, and will have opportunities to make a comeback. GME has Ryan Cohen leading, a proven successful businessman that has already taken precautions to ensure GameStop never goes bankrupt. Popcorn just doesn’t have that. It is very short-squeezable, but it’s not deep fucking value.
*“Short sellers must eventually close, or cover, their short position.”* 
Ok, but why ‘must’ they? This is another point I think has been lost in the memes. There are two problems with just saying ‘shorts must close’ without providing context. The first is the simple fact that there isn’t a due date. Unlike a common car loan or mortgage, a short position doesn’t operate on a time table. They can wait forever to close, unless they get margin called.
This next part I’m a little shaky on, I’m probably getting some things wrong here:
Ok, well how are they going to get margin called? The problem I see is that these Short Hedge Funds (SHF) are making a lot of money by selling naked shorts. It’s really hard to get margin called when they are literally printing money, and since they don’t have to report these their books just look to be filled with an infinite amount of cash.
So, there are a couple solutions to this:
1, Government regulation. If the SEC puts a stop to naked shorting, these SHF can’t print money anymore. Eventually the interest from their positions will eat them alive, and they will get margin called. Unfortunately, MOASS has the potential to destroy the economy like in 2008, so they probably aren’t too keen on just doing this without creating some kind of safety net. So I can’t really count on them to help, because the government has a vested interest in keeping MOASS from happening. It’s just not something I believe will be the catalyst. Although they might just do it on purpose given the right reason, like pinning the economic collapse on a scapegoat, or by GameStop forcing their hand by exposing the fraud somehow. I’ve seen a lot of apes hoping for one of these reasons to come to pass, but for me, I don’t see enough motivation from the participating parties.
2, A price run-up. If the price of the stock can unbalance the books of the SHF enough then they could also get margin called. I’m not counting on this either, since the price is manipulated by the process of naked shorting. Sure, they are digging a bigger grave when they suppress the price like this, but it can also help smaller SHFs with exiting their positions with OTC stuff. Over-The-Counter trades are trades made off the lit exchanges, historically it was intended to kind of simulate a transaction between two individuals, like buying a video game from a buddy off the books, no taxes, no regulation. Unfortunately, this is abused by institutions and can’t even be used by individuals, making dark pools of trades full of fraud and undermines the free market. Smaller SHFs that are more at risk of getting Margin Called due to their lack of collateral, can make OTC trades with the big naked-shorting market makers to ‘close’ their positions using fake shares. Of course, this only passes the buck so to speak, but it’s a viable strategy for them since the big SHFs that take on these ‘bucks’ are less likely to get margin called. A lot of historic short squeezes happen because a small SHF gets margin called, then drives the price up and causes a bigger SHF to get called, and so on until they’re all in the grave. This is why I don’t really give a shit if the price goes up to $80 in a week, it’s not enough, the buck has been passed. (To be clear, I don’t have proof that this is the reason for the uptick in OTC transactions, it’s just a theory. If a smarter ape than I can get on this that would be great.) But, even if a price run-up itself doesn’t cause MOASS, it may give motivation for the true trigger:
3, Interest Rates. Here is the big one that I look at, that I believe will be the true cause of MOASS. Now please, correct me if I’m wrong again, I am just an ape who dropped out of college. So, from what I understand a Short institution has to pay a certain amount of interest to the people they borrow the stocks from. This is the cost of borrowing and is how these Lenders make money. For a long time, the interest rate was at like 1%, this means that selling one naked short could cover the cost of the interest 100 times over. However, let’s say that the interest rate becomes 110%, sounds crazy, but this would mean that borrowing the share would cost more than the share. This would destroy the balances of the SHFs and ensure they get margin called. Why would this ever happen though? Because these lenders want to make money. These lenders are the real winners of MOASS, and they aren’t talked about enough in my opinion. Lenders can’t sell the shares they’ve lent out, their income is in the interest rates, there has to be a balance here between it being more profitable to lend the shares or to sell them. If Lenders start to think that lending their shares aren’t making them more money than the alternative, they will raise interest rates to make these profits until SHFs can’t pay them, then the SHFs have to return the shares, causing MOASS with the massive buyback, then lenders can just sell the shares on the way down. Lenders have a monetary business interest in causing MOASS, so they are the most likely cause of it in my opinion.
*“This is the GME MOASS thesis. GME is a stock that stands to hit an unprecedented price point due to the fact that manipulators of the market have failed to bankrupt GameStop thanks in huge part to the Legendary Keith Gill AKA* u(slash)DeepFuckingValue*, Ryan Cohen, and all of the GME investors who took part in this saga. It may not be today, this week, or even this month, but one day soon, these toxic participants have no choice but to buy the stock to close out their short positions.”* 
I don’t think this is necessarily inaccurate, but I think it’s misguided, and the language here is a bit to emotive for my taste. I think the reason the company didn’t go bankrupt is because of the strategic share offering made by Ryan Cohen to build up more cash than the company’s valuation (at the time). All the other stuff was just dressing, DFV and retail did not make RC do this, this move by RC is what ensured the company literally can’t go bankrupt, until then (and at the time this was posted) it was still a risk in my opinion. So this huge thanks feels kinda like a pre-cum celebration, and I've never really liked putting Keith on a pedestal, he's just an individual investor, just like the rest of us.

FAQ, Published April 12, 2021, by u(slash)BYE_TRIANGLE
*“Why does Holding do anything?”* *“They need your shares to cover their short positions! They got greedy. Thinking GameStop would fail, the short sellers started Naked Shorting the stock. Long story short they created synthetic stocks with their special privileges as Market Makers. But they can’t cover a short with a synthetic share. So because of the Naked Shorting, the Short Sellers, multiple large greedy money managers, and Hedge Funds need a total number of shares greater than the number available to purchase. THEY NEED EVERY SHARE, EVEN YOURS CONAN!”* *“aRe YoU GuYs MaNipuLatIng THe MaRKeT?!”* 
Holding does something else that I think is really important. It proves that retail is not responsible for the manipulation of the price. You see it in the mainstream media every time the price fluctuates, they say that retail and Roaring Kitty is driving the price up for the memes, and that the ‘meme stock craze is dead’ whenever the price falls, claiming that retail is selling. However, it quickly becomes clear to anyone with the willingness to research that retail holds. Holding doesn’t move the price at all, so they literally can’t blame this sub for the fuckery that happens.
Now, on the flip side, I know people on the old sub to buy and sell with these fluctuations, they did it during the sneeze and I’ve seen comments claiming to do it last week. I think this is why Roaring Kitty really had to speak to congress about this, because a legitimate-seeming argument could be made that retail was buying and selling at high volumes. The loss and gain porn on the old sub could be presented as evidence. Here though, apes hold, we glaze purple doughnuts.
So when MOASS does happen, the massive price increase will be only due to buying pressure from SHFs, so they are the only ones that can take the blame for what happens next.
*“No one knows how high the squeeze could take the stock price. The best rational reasoning says that these numbers \[500k per share\] are possible through the laws of supply and demand. Furthermore, it is likely that the Short Percentage is a lot higher than reported, with many suggesting that the short-sellers, cumulatively, need more than 100% of the float to cover.”* 
A lot of naysayers will claim people are insane for thinking that phone number prices are possible. They will cite that it would make the company’s valuation higher than the amount of money in the world, which is true. However, with the nature of fraudulent naked shorts being fake, the price is fake too, and the valuation of the company doesn’t necessarily mean that the whole float will be sold at those prices. Yes, it shouldn’t be possible, by all accounts it wouldn’t make sense, but it is possible due to the naked shorting. Also, institutions that own shares likely won’t HODL out for the phone number prices, they will sell when they think it’s safe, and when they won’t get in trouble with the SEC for destroying the economy. The infinity pool (the shares that will be sold at these prices) will be a small fraction of the total amount even among retail investors. So the argument that I see against the possibility of this doesn’t hold a lot of weight.
Keep in mind that even though ‘buying pressure’ moves the price up, someone has to be willing to sell in order for someone to buy. So as the price creeps up from $100 to $1000 to $100000 to $8675309 someone will be selling on the way up to get there.
*“Synthetic long positions could be used to disguise their short positions as well, the mechanisms behind this practice utilize the options markets and could explain some of the crazy options activity that we have seen in GameStop the last few months.”* 
So uhm… I don’t understand ‘Synthetic Longs’ at all. Could an ape with more wrinkles elaborate on this? From what I can extrapolate, this may refer to an institution purchasing a naked shorted share from someone else?
*“While at the same time they employed the use of social engineering to slowly depress the positive sentiment for the stock on Reddit and elsewhere.”* *“You may have been called a Shill for one of a number of reasons. This community is very inclusive and open to everyone, but because of the blatant attacks this forum has suffered a lot of people are understandably paranoid. (Myself included). Please, unless you really are a shill, don’t take it personally.”* 
I want to address this, because there is a lot of misconception about SuperStonk. A lot of people will claim that this sub is just an echo chamber cult that can’t handle anyone questioning the narrative. This may seem true on the surface, but I think the reality is just that we’ve become hyper sensitive to the social engineering the old sub fell victim to, and I remember this sub being attacked with that as well. So whenever we see a post that has extremely emotive language, we become skeptical and down vote it. Emotions have no place in investing, that is a common rule touted in even the oldest investing books, so posts that try to incite an emotional response are shot down. Apes aren’t about to be manipulated again. That being said there are emotive posts that still get upvoted, ones with positive hype-filled narratives. Since these get upvoted and the negative ones don’t that sometimes gives the impression of an echo chamber. This is because the facts do support the MOASS thesis, so a hype title and opening paragraph is just more agreeable with the facts-based narrative. Some people are just scrolling on their phone and don’t have time to read the whole post.
However, if you go into the comments of these posts, there are apes investigating the profile history to determine if posters are bots, regardless of the pushed narrative. If you look past the upvote counter, apes are very skeptical of any post that isn’t based in fact or harmless memes. The comments rule the post, and I have to say I’ve very proud of this sub for staying vigilant in the wake of Reddit restricting moderation tools.
*“Ryan Cohen clearly believes in Gamestop, to the point of announcing that he will be taking equity as compensation. In fact, as of writing this all of the new Gamestop board members are going to be taking equity as compensation. This is seen as an incredibly bullish sign of the company's future success.”* 
This is one of the principles of Deep Value investing, I wish this was elaborated on more of why this is bullish. This means that the board, and more importantly Ryan Cohen, is tying their individual self-worth to the company. Due to this tie, they will essentially ‘go down with the ship’ if the company goes down. This means that the board and Ryan actually have an interest in the company doing well, instead of having an interest in making money off the company. You may think this sounds like the same thing, but it’s not. If RC cared more about money than the company, then he could destroy the company to make money (this is what’s happening to popcorn), but by tying his worth to the shares, the only way for him to become richer is for the company to flourish.
I don’t really like the language being used here, stuff like ‘clearly believes’ ‘seen as incredibly bullish’ are all pretty emotive and doesn’t actually explain why these are positive growth signs for the company, they are just saying it is ‘bullish’, the average new investor isn’t even going to know what that really means. Even though GME is extremely manipulated, causing Technical Analysis to become increasingly difficult to depend on, the investment is still rooted in fundamentals of deep value.
*“Below is a shortlist of some of the potential catalysts people are speculating about:* 
-A Stock Split, or some similar move from Gamestop that recalls shares
-Gamma Squeeze
-Gamestop’s Q1 Earnings Call
-Some speculate Gary Gensler (Newly appointed head of the SEC), may make some move that sets things in motion
-DTCC rule changes taking effect
-Appointment of a new CEO”
Yeah… this feels bad man. I’ve talked about this already, but we can rapid fire down this list.
The stock split didn’t work out, since those in charge of distributing the splits did it fraudulently. Gamma Squeeze is the kind of thing that could trigger a smaller hedge fund to get margin called and cause a domino effect, but I’ve shared my theory of the OTC action. Earnings are nice, but public sentiment has always been more tied to the media manipulation than actual facts. Fucking Gary.
On the subject of bringing in new talent, I do feel like a big move will happen soon. We’ve already seen a lot of job offerings from the Corporate side of GameStop so this could be the next phase of the plan. I really think that RC has spent these last few years taking precautions to make sure the company can’t go bankrupt, the last thing he wants is to turn out like Toys-R-Us. A lot of downsizing happened, so now he can start thinking about upsizing again.
I’m not necessarily saying that these things can’t trigger the squeeze, but I am saying that depending on something to start it is just inviting disappointment. I think the ‘no dates’ rule has been sorely forgotten lately with all the hype and speculation around Roaring Kitty’s tweets and stuff. I am a zen ape, it happens when it happens.
*“First of all, it is incredibly important to note your potential biases when determining if someone is just a shill trying to spread FUD. Not all FUD is invalid, someone may bring up a solid point against an otherwise great DD, and that could scare you. Remember that just because you do not like what someone is saying, doesn’t make it invalid. It is important users here work with constructive criticism to refine their theories.”* 
Damn, wasn’t I just talking about this? This critique isn’t going to just be wagging fingers, this is really good stuff that still applies today, and from what I’ve seen apes are doing a great job of distinguishing between FUD and legitimate criticism. I also want to take a second to thank the mod team, especially after their tools were restricted, they’ve been a great help.
*“…but since then retail investors have been buying on every single dip in the price… That's more than two whole months of buying-the-dip. Now, I will not speculate on numbers here, if you want to know more you will have to read the DDs on that.”* 
This is pretty outdated now. Apes have been buying for three years now, and with the advent of Direct Registering we have a much better idea of how much apes hold. I can say with confidence now that retail owns a floats worth of shares. Since there is so much naked shorting, a lot of institutions probably own their own floats too.
I glaze those purple doughnuts, yum.

Citadel Has No Clothes, Published March 14, 2021, by u(slash)ATOBITT
Ohhhh, this one is special to me, I read it when it first came out, first time I was there on release night. Let’s see how it hodls up.
*“TL;DR - Citadel Securities has been fined 58 times for violating FINRA, REGSHO & SEC regulations. Several instances are documented as 'willful' naked shorting. In Dec 2020 they reported an increase in their short position of 127.57% YOY, and I'm calling bullsh\*t on their shenanigans.”* 
58 times. I don’t actually know how much that number has gone up, but I’m sure it has. I am reminded of an old saying, that if the punishment for a crime is a fine, then it only a crime for the poor. The crime being done to GME is class warfare, it’s nothing less.
*“$295,347,948,000 of that is split into options (calls & puts), while $78,979,887,238 (20.52%) is allocated to actual, physical, shares (or so they say). The rest is convertible debt securities.”* 
This is why I’m skeptical that it’s even possible for Citadel to get margin called by a normal price run-up. Let’s do some math here. GME’s float is at 232 million-ish shares, let’s say they shorted 300% of that, just to be conservative (lmao), so that’s 696 million. To take what the first post said, Margins don’t get called unless an entities’ collateral becomes less than 80% of what they’ve borrowed. If they use their entire $384,926,232,238 portfolio as collateral, then GME would have to soar to a price of… divide by 4, multiply by 5… $691.32 per share. That may sound relatively reasonable, but I don’t think a normal catalyst would be enough for that. I really think interest rates are the key, think about it, if they have to pay like 30% interest on all of those shares, their portfolio will be reduced by that much (kinda) and we can find a much more reasonable midpoint. Now brace yourselves, I’m about to spend an unreasonable amount of effort on something that is probably wrong because I don’t know shit about fuck about margins or getting called (I have a cash account and I lack rizz).
In order to calculate that we gotta do one of those double equation variable bullshit things we all hated in school, I forgot what they were called but I remember how to do them.
So, we have a few variables:
C = Citadel’s Portfolio = $384,926,232,238
S = Shorted Shares = 696,000,000
I = Intrest = 0.30
X = Price Per Share
Y = Citadel’s new portfolio amount after paying interest
So, X and Y are undetermined, but we have two equations to work with
C – I(X*S) = Y
This one calculates how much money is going to be in citadels new portfolio after paying interest, we calculate the interest by multiplying the cost per share, by the amount of shorted shares, and multiplying that by the interest rate, then subtracting it from their total portfolio.
Y * 1.25 = X * S
This one calculates the total amount those shorted shares have to be in order for Citadel to get margin called, by multiplying their new portfolio by 5/4 and calculating the total cost of the shares.
X * S has a direct value; we can plug the left side of the second equation into the first to get
C – I(Y*1.25) = Y
Now we just gotta isolate Y on one side of the equation.
C = Y + 0.3(Y*1.25)
C = 1.3Y * 0.375
C= 0.4875Y
C * 0.4875 = Y
Y = $187,651,538,216.03
Now we gotta find X, we can just plug in the other stuff.
(Y* 1.25)/ 696,000,000 = X
X = $337.02 per share for shitadel to get margin called on 30% interest.
Holy shit, now that’s what I call reasonable. See how much interest can completely fuck a portfolio? They lost almost half of their portfolio value to a 30% interest to this. This is why the whole market will bleed red on the run up to MOASS, they will have to sell half of their portfolio just to pay the interest.
Citadel is probably not a good example of this, since they print the naked shorts themselves... so they would be paying interest to... themselves... when they borrow them? Citadel is so fucked up, I don't have enough wrinkles for this.
But hey, I think the concept of what I said is fine. High interest rates can reduce collateral and cause margin calls. Hey, just out of curiosity, how much is the borrowing interest rate looking now?
16.5%
SHF are fucked.

Anyway, I’m writing this on a Wordpad document so I’m not sure if I’ve come up on the character limit, but I think I’m getting close so I’ll end this part here. Please let me know what I’ve got wrong or any insights you want to share, I’ll be sure to talk about any interesting comments when I do a part 2!
TLDR: I am reviewing the Diamond Handbook (2nd) and seeing what has changed in the three years since it’s been compiled. I have a bias in thinking that high borrowing interest rates are what will cause MOASS, and that is shown here. This is not meant to be an impartial analysis, just my thoughts. Not financial advice.
submitted by TheGangstaGandalf to Superstonk [link] [comments]


2024.05.19 14:30 johnyedwards51 Yolov8 NotImplementedError with GPU but works with CPU. Please help

I used Yolov8 to train my dataset with the CPU and it went great when I wanted to use GPU and train another dataset it's giving me NotImplementedError. i have set up cuda and pytroch and they are defined without any problems, How could I fix it. Please help me. Thank you
the code:
from ultralytics import YOLO
model = YOLO("yolov8m.yaml")
model.train(data="yolo_con.yaml", epochs=100)
my cuda version and Ultralytics:
2.3.0+cu121
12.1
3.11.4 (tags/v3.11.4:d2340ef, Jun 7 2023, 05:45:37) [MSC v.1934 64 bit (AMD64)]
Ultralytics YOLOv8.2.16 Python-3.11.4 torch-2.3.0+cu121 CUDA:0 (NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 8192MiB)
Setup complete (16 CPUs, 15.7 GB RAM, 22.7/64.0 GB disk)
the error:
Ultralytics YOLOv8.2.16 Python-3.11.4 torch-2.3.0+cu121 CUDA:0 (NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 8192MiB)
engine\trainer: task=detect, mode=train, model=yolov8m.yaml, data=yolo_con.yaml, epochs=100, time=None, patience=100, batch=16, imgsz=640, save=True, save_period=-1, cache=False, device=None, workers=8, project=None, name=train, exist_ok=False, pretrained=True, optimizer=auto, verbose=True, seed=0, deterministic=True, single_cls=False, rect=False, cos_lr=False, close_mosaic=10, resume=False, amp=True, fraction=1.0, profile=False, freeze=None, multi_scale=False, overlap_mask=True, mask_ratio=4, dropout=0.0, val=True, split=val, save_json=False, save_hybrid=False, conf=None, iou=0.7, max_det=300, half=False, dnn=False, plots=True, source=None, vid_stride=1, stream_buffer=False, visualize=False, augment=False, agnostic_nms=False, classes=None, retina_masks=False, embed=None, show=False, save_frames=False, save_txt=False, save_conf=False, save_crop=False, show_labels=True, show_conf=True, show_boxes=True, line_width=None, format=torchscript, keras=False, optimize=False, int8=False, dynamic=False, simplify=False, opset=None, workspace=4, nms=False, lr0=0.01, lrf=0.01, momentum=0.937, weight_decay=0.0005, warmup_epochs=3.0, warmup_momentum=0.8, warmup_bias_lr=0.1, box=7.5, cls=0.5, dfl=1.5, pose=12.0, kobj=1.0, label_smoothing=0.0, nbs=64, hsv_h=0.015, hsv_s=0.7, hsv_v=0.4, degrees=0.0, translate=0.1, scale=0.5, shear=0.0, perspective=0.0, flipud=0.0, fliplr=0.5, bgr=0.0, mosaic=1.0, mixup=0.0, copy_paste=0.0, auto_augment=randaugment, erasing=0.4, crop_fraction=1.0, cfg=None, tracker=botsort.yaml, save_dir=runs\detect\train
WARNING:tensorflow:From c:\Users\eraha\AppData\Local\Programs\Python\Python311\Lib\site-packages\keras\src\losses.py:2976: The name tf.losses.sparse_softmax_cross_entropy is deprecated. Please use tf.compat.v1.losses.sparse_softmax_cross_entropy instead.
Overriding model.yaml nc=80 with nc=4
from n params module arguments
0 -1 1 1392 ultralytics.nn.modules.conv.Conv [3, 48, 3, 2]
1 -1 1 41664 ultralytics.nn.modules.conv.Conv [48, 96, 3, 2]
2 -1 2 111360 ultralytics.nn.modules.block.C2f [96, 96, 2, True]
3 -1 1 166272 ultralytics.nn.modules.conv.Conv [96, 192, 3, 2]
4 -1 4 813312 ultralytics.nn.modules.block.C2f [192, 192, 4, True]
5 -1 1 664320 ultralytics.nn.modules.conv.Conv [192, 384, 3, 2]
6 -1 4 3248640 ultralytics.nn.modules.block.C2f [384, 384, 4, True]
7 -1 1 1991808 ultralytics.nn.modules.conv.Conv [384, 576, 3, 2]
8 -1 2 3985920 ultralytics.nn.modules.block.C2f [576, 576, 2, True]
9 -1 1 831168 ultralytics.nn.modules.block.SPPF [576, 576, 5]
10 -1 1 0 torch.nn.modules.upsampling.Upsample [None, 2, 'nearest']
11 [-1, 6] 1 0 ultralytics.nn.modules.conv.Concat [1]
12 -1 2 1993728 ultralytics.nn.modules.block.C2f [960, 384, 2]
13 -1 1 0 torch.nn.modules.upsampling.Upsample [None, 2, 'nearest']
14 [-1, 4] 1 0 ultralytics.nn.modules.conv.Concat [1]
15 -1 2 517632 ultralytics.nn.modules.block.C2f [576, 192, 2]
16 -1 1 332160 ultralytics.nn.modules.conv.Conv [192, 192, 3, 2]
17 [-1, 12] 1 0 ultralytics.nn.modules.conv.Concat [1] ...TensorBoard: Start with 'tensorboard --logdir runs\detect\train', view at http://localhost:6006/
Freezing layer 'model.22.dfl.conv.weight'
AMP: running Automatic Mixed Precision (AMP) checks with YOLOv8n...
Downloading https://github.com/ultralytics/assets/releases/download/v8.2.0/yolov8n.pt to 'yolov8n.pt'...
Output is truncated. View as a scrollable element or open in a text editor. Adjust cell output settings...100%██████████ 6.23M/6.23M [00:02<00:00, 2.87MB/s]
NotImplementedError Traceback (most recent call last)
Cell In[3], line 5
1 from ultralytics import YOLO
3 model = YOLO("yolov8m.yaml")
-- 5 model.train(data="yolo_con.yaml", epochs=100)
File c:\Users\eraha\AppData\Local\Programs\Python\Python311\Lib\site-packages\ultralytics\engine\model.py:674, in Model.train(self, trainer, **kwargs)
671pass
673 self.trainer.hub_session = self.session # attach optional HUB session
674 self.trainer.train()
675 # Update model and cfg after training
676 if RANK in {-1, 0}:
File c:\Users\eraha\AppData\Local\Programs\Python\Python311\Lib\site-packages\ultralytics\engine\trainer.py:199, in BaseTrainer.train(self)
196ddp_cleanup(self, str(file))
198 else:
199self._do_train(world_size)
File c:\Users\eraha\AppData\Local\Programs\Python\Python311\Lib\site-packages\ultralytics\engine\trainer.py:313, in BaseTrainer._do_train(self, world_size)
311 if world_size > 1:
312self._setup_ddp(world_size)
313 self._setup_train(world_size)
315 nb = len(self.train_loader) # number of batches
316 nw = max(round(self.args.warmup_epochs * nb), 100) if self.args.warmup_epochs > 0 else -1 # warmup iterations...PythonTLSSnapshot: registered at ..\aten\src\ATen\core\PythonFallbackKernel.cpp:162 [backend fallback]
FuncTorchDynamicLayerFrontMode: registered at ..\aten\src\ATen\functorch\DynamicLayer.cpp:493 [backend fallback]
PreDispatch: registered at ..\aten\src\ATen\core\PythonFallbackKernel.cpp:166 [backend fallback]
PythonDispatcher: registered at ..\aten\src\ATen\core\PythonFallbackKernel.cpp:158 [backend fallback]
Output is truncated. View as a scrollable element or open in a text editor. Adjust cell output settings...
submitted by johnyedwards51 to computervision [link] [comments]


2024.05.19 12:42 Count-Daring243 Best Carry Handle Red Dot

Best Carry Handle Red Dot

https://preview.redd.it/b0wvdkuo3d1d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0eff86f008f9c978a11514d956720d40372ec8ca
Get ready to explore the world of Carry Handle Red Dots with our comprehensive roundup. In this article, we'll dive into the unique features and top options of these handy sight devices. Whether you're a seasoned marksman or just starting out, our rounded-up picks will have you covered. So, buckle up as we guide you through the world of Carry Handle Red Dots.

The Top 18 Best Carry Handle Red Dot

  1. Enhanced AR-15 Charging Handle from Armaspec - Experience seamless loading with the Armaspec Victory Charging Handle Red, designed for ambidextrous usage, providing an enlarged handle with integrated gas vents, and engineered with a center force charging mechanism in the USA.
  2. Kydex IWB Holster for 1911 5" Government 45ACP with Rail Only Red Dot Optic Cut - A reliable, customizable, and comfortable IWB holster for your 1911 5" Government 45ACP with Rail Only Red Dot Optic Cut, featuring adjustable retention, ride, cant, and clip to ensure a secure and seamless carry experience.
  3. Carrying Handle for Laylax Nitro.Vo Long-Plaza Airsoft Replica - Laylax Nitro VO Carrying Handle Long – Plaza Japan's top-rated airsoft replica, offering superior durability and a reliable performance, with a 5.0 rating, and no notable downsides.
  4. Systainer3 Lid Handle - Carmine Red Organizer Handle for Systainers - Systainer3 Lid Handle in Carmine Red - Replace or enhance your SYS3 systainers with a stylish, versatile, and easy-to-use handle for efficient organization.
  5. Comfortable Icom MB123 Pull Handle for Radio Carrying - ICOM MB123 Pull Handle: Enhance your ham radio experience with a convenient, sturdy, and stylish 1/4" x 3" transceiver carrying handle, making it easier to tote your devices around.
  6. Stylish Kayak Carry Handles for All-Purpose Use - Get a firm grip on your kayak adventure with Wollcocer Kayak Carry Handles, offering durable rubber and robust stainless steel screws for a secure fit and comfortable holding.
  7. Fashionable Origami-Inspired Carry Handle for Crossbody Bags - Embrace Japanese artistry with the stylish Miyako 49 1/4in (125cm) handle, perfect for creating unique and practical crossbody bags using the Origami fabric folding technique.
  8. SKB iSeries Small Red Dot Handle for Maximum Performance and Comfort - SKB's 3i-hd73-rd Red Overmolded Small iSeries Handle - Cushion comfort meets color-coded convenience for optimal case handling.
  9. Carrying Handle for Yaesu FT-450D Transceivers - Yaesu MHG-1: Add convenience and comfort to transport your transceiver with Yaesu Transceiver Carrying Handles, designed for FT-450D, FT-710, and related models.
  10. Stahlin Electrical Products' Smooth Carry Handle - The Stahlin Rech109506 Encl Carry Handle offers a durable and ergonomic solution for your enclosure, featuring a robust red dot design that enhances your user experience.
  11. Strike Extended Latch Charging Handle for AR15/AR10 Rifles - Strike Industries' Extended Latch ARCH-EL Red Charge Handle offers a hard-anodized finish and robust 7075 T-6 aluminum construction for a durable, ergonomic, and functional upgrade to your AR15 or AR10 platform.
  12. Mil Spec AR-15 Carry Handle Assembly - Experience ultimate precision and durability with the LBE Unlimited ARCHAS Mlspc AR15 Carry Handle Assembly - the perfect enhanced companion for your firearm.
  13. Miyako Handle: Sleek, Adjustable Red Carry Bag Handle for DIY No-Sew Storage Pouches - Transform your fabric into a stylish, no-sew shoulder carry bag with Miyako Handle's versatile Red Notion, perfect for creating bags from your favorite fabrics and tying them seamlessly.
  14. Mil-Spec Detachable AR-15 Carry Handle - Upgrade your AR-15 experience with the Luth-AR Detachable Carry Handle, featuring a durable Mil-Spec design for superior performance and unwavering precision.
  15. AR-15 Detachable Carry Handle Assembly - Black - Upgrade your AR-15 with the sleek and durable A1 Detachable Carry Handle Assembly from CNCGUNS, designed for peep-style sight compatibility and a black finish that matches your preferred aesthetic.
  16. Sleek Black Replacement Kayak Grab Handle for Basic Kayaks - Sea-Lect Designs' replacement kayak webbing carry handle with caps offers basic comfort for flat water and touring kayaks, but limited strength and not suitable for white water kayaks.
  17. Sig Sauer P320 Full Size Holster: Lightweight, Practical Concealed Carry Option - Discreet, durable, and customizable, this lightweight IWB holster provides versatile concealed carry for your Sig Sauer P320 Full Size 9MM/.40SW with Manual Safety Red Dot Optic Cut.
  18. Tilta Compact Top Handle for RED V-RAPTOR Camera - Equip your RED V-RAPTOR with added functionality and security with the Tilta Top Handle and its 15mm rod compatibility, secure mounting points, and aluminum alloy and steel construction.
As an Amazon™ Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Reviews

🔗Enhanced AR-15 Charging Handle from Armaspec


https://preview.redd.it/pm0adgbp3d1d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a53027e033e0caad915b996eca0240a439474ea8
As an avid AR-15 enthusiast, I recently had the chance to try out the Armaspec Victory Charging Handle in Red. This charging handle stands out from the rest with its ambidextrous design that allows for easy operation and use from both hands. The enlarged handle latches make it a convenient and comfortable choice, and the integrated gas vents center force charging ensure optimal functionality.
One of the key highlights of this charging handle is its seamless integration and compatibility with various rifles. I found it to be a smooth and easy-to-install part that did not require any additional modifications to fit my AR-15. The quality of the product is top-notch, as evidenced by the solid construction and well-engineered components. The centerforce charging system in particular is a game-changer, making it easier to cycle through rounds and providing a more efficient shooting experience.
However, there were a few drawbacks to this charging handle that I couldn't overlook. The oversized handles may protrude a bit too much for some users, causing discomfort when the rifle is worn or carried for extended periods. Additionally, the enlarged latches may have a slightly looser fit compared to other charging handles, which could cause some users to feel a lack of secureness when handling the rifle.
Overall, I would highly recommend the Armaspec Victory Charging Handle Red for anyone looking for an affordable yet high-quality charging handle option for their AR-15. Its smooth operation and easy handling make it a fantastic choice, even if you're not left-handed. The enlarged latches and gas vents further enhance its functionality and durability, making it a reliable and worthwhile investment for any shooter. Despite the minor drawbacks, I believe this charging handle is well worth the money and a great addition to an AR-15 build.

🔗Kydex IWB Holster for 1911 5" Government 45ACP with Rail Only Red Dot Optic Cut


https://preview.redd.it/zjpddlwp3d1d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c136f0d812c35c918d25b093e68cc87ed479d05c
As someone who's been carrying a personal firearm for safety purposes, I'm always on the lookout for high-quality holsters that provide both comfort and security. This particular IWB Holster for 1911 5" Government 45ACP with Rail Only Red Dot Optic Cut caught my eye due to the customization options it provides. I decided to give it a whirl, and after using it for a week or so, I've formed a pretty solid opinion.
First off, the holster fits the gun perfectly and feels like it's a custom-made piece for my handgun. The adjustable retention feature is a game-changer, allowing me to fine-tune the tension that the holster applies to my firearm. The adjustable ride and cant settings make for a truly versatile carrying solution—a definite plus in my book.
One of the features I adore the most is the adjustable clip. Having eight different positions to choose from means I can place the holster anywhere on my belt, depending on the situation. This flexibility is crucial for someone who aims to stay concealed most of the time. The belt clip is quite secure, making cleaning draws a breeze.
However, there were a couple of small issues I ran into with this holster. The protective sweat guard is a noble addition, but it can sometimes block the sight of my firearm, which can be a bit annoying during quick checks. My only other gripe is the fact that the belt clip can protrude a bit too much, catching on things and, at times, making the holster itself hard to conceal.
All in all, based on my experience with this IWB Holster for 1911 5" Government 45ACP with Rail Only Red Dot Optic Cut, I found that it provides a comfortable, secure way to carry my firearm while taking advantage of the adjustability features it boasts. It's not without flaws, but it gets the job done for the most part.

🔗Carrying Handle for Laylax Nitro.Vo Long-Plaza Airsoft Replica


https://preview.redd.it/hgtduo3q3d1d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c7f999494673c273df7cfd105c244d09660b31a5
I recently had the opportunity to try out the Laylax Nitro. Vo Carrying Handle Long - Plaza Japan, and I must say it was a game-changer for my airsoft replica. Made right in Japan, the quality of this handle is unmatched, and it definitely sets it apart from other carry handles on the market.
One of the best features of this handle is its sleek design. The red dot sight fits perfectly, making it incredibly comfortable to use. The handle is also lightweight, which makes it easy to maneuver during gameplay. However, one downside I noticed is that the handle can be a bit slippery at times, especially when you're in the heat of the moment.
Overall, the Laylax Nitro. Vo Carrying Handle Long - Plaza Japan is a fantastic investment for any airsoft enthusiast. Its high-quality build and ergonomic design make it a must-have accessory for your replica. Just be sure to give it a good grip to prevent any accidental slips.

🔗Systainer3 Lid Handle - Carmine Red Organizer Handle for Systainers

https://preview.redd.it/0uz4eihq3d1d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b57a7d2f96102ef3edaa7eb1418b7e89e7b23c35

I recently had the chance to try out the SYS3 top handle from Tanos, perfect for SYS3 style systainers. This handle is versatile and can fit systainers of various heights. Whether you need to replace a broken handle or simply want to customize your systainers, this Carmine Red color is a perfect addition to your organization system.
One great feature is how easy it is to pop off the SYS3 handle by using a lever under the handle and pressing down. However, make sure to use something soft to avoid damaging the systainer lid or handle. Overall, the SYS3 top handle is a great addition to any systainer organization system, and it's a breeze to install!

🔗Comfortable Icom MB123 Pull Handle for Radio Carrying


https://preview.redd.it/zx4g5mxq3d1d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5e954595592efd588e51048f1d6d8f84c5efdbf1
I recently integrated the ICOM MB-123 handle into my daily routine while using an ICOM radio. The design of the handle is sleek and unobtrusive, which was a pleasant surprise for such an essential accessory. It has proven to be very practical when I need to move the radio around or transport it to remote locations.
However, one minor issue I encountered was the difficulty in securing the rubber feet onto the transceiver. The installation process was a bit tricky, but once I figured out the best way to get them in place, it wasn't much of a concern.
Overall, the ICOM MB-123 handle provides a convenient and stylish solution to carrying and transporting the radio. It's a worthwhile addition to any ICOM radio enthusiast's collection.

🔗Stylish Kayak Carry Handles for All-Purpose Use


https://preview.redd.it/vcatz98r3d1d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=83f10e9dd470159ceb039f3c73e208eaeb5c87c5
Recently, I had the opportunity to use Wollcocer's Kayak Carry Handles as a replacement for my kayak's old handles. After struggling with slippery handles and struggling to lug my kayak onto my car, I was excited to see if these rubber handles could solve my problems.
Upon installation, I found the handles to be very easy to mount, as the screws fit perfectly into my kayak's holes. The handles themselves were surprisingly ergonomic, featuring a well-designed contour grip that prevented them from slipping while I maneuvered my kayak.
Despite their tough appearances, these handles turned out to be quite soft and flexible, which I appreciated during long kayaking trips. The rubber material also felt durable and long-lasting, something that had been lacking in my previous handles.
On the downside, I did notice that the screws didn't come with washers, which would have added a bit of extra polish to the final result. However, overall, I was very pleased with my purchase and am eager to put these new kayak handles to the test during my next kayaking adventure!

🔗Fashionable Origami-Inspired Carry Handle for Crossbody Bags


https://preview.redd.it/njs2pslr3d1d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1db2891888450de2aa065933d0262fec52fa0726
I recently got my hands on the Miyako Handle, a unique cross-body bag that stands out thanks to its innovative Origami fabric folding technique. I've used it for quite some time now, and let me tell you, it's a real game-changer in the world of fashionable yet practical bags.
The first thing that caught my attention was its sleek, elegant design. The combination of vibrant red dots with the elegant handle makes it a real showstopper. But it's not just about looks, this bag is incredibly versatile and functional.
The Miyako Handle is a bit of a chameleon - it can transform from a stylish accessory into a practical carry solution seamlessly. It's designed with a single strap, which I initially thought would be a downside, but it's actually quite comfortable and convenient, especially when I'm on the go.
However, one thing I did notice was that the strap could be a bit longer for my taste. While it works perfectly for a cross-body position, I found myself wishing for a bit more adjustability when it came to the length.
Overall, I've been pretty impressed with the Miyako Handle. Its unique design and functionality make it a standout product that has certainly enhanced my everyday look. Despite the minor strap issue, I'd definitely recommend it for anyone looking for a blend of style and practicality in their bag collection.

🔗SKB iSeries Small Red Dot Handle for Maximum Performance and Comfort

https://preview.redd.it/4yuvh9zr3d1d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a8809eee914fa2634f8392c5679ad44e5a1886f3

In my daily life, I've been using the SKB iSeries Small Replacement Handle in red overmold. The first thing that stood out to me is the comfort it offers. The cushioned overmolded handle provides a secure and comfortable grip, making it perfect for carrying my iSeries case around.
The color-coded handle also adds an extra touch of convenience. With multiple cases in different colors, it can be difficult to keep track of which one I'm carrying. The red dot handle helps me quickly identify my case, saving me time and frustration.
However, I noticed that the installation process was a bit tricky. It required some patience and precision to ensure the handle was securely attached to the case. If it were a bit easier to install, it would be even more enjoyable to use.
Overall, the SKB iSeries Small Replacement Handle in red overmold is a durable and comfortable accessory for my iSeries case. It's easy to identify my case when I'm on the go, and the cushioned handle provides a secure grip. The only downside is the installation process, but once it's in place, the benefits outweigh the hassle.

🔗Carrying Handle for Yaesu FT-450D Transceivers


https://preview.redd.it/pp1awnas3d1d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3aad3763cbe3a3bcafba2f61bed70fa6d0b41d84
The Yaesu MHG-1 Carry Handle is a must-have accessory for your transceiver, designed specifically for the FT-450D. This handle makes it much easier and safer to transport your radio, especially when you're on the go.
One of the unique features of this handle is that it's designed to be attached on either the left or right side of your transceiver, giving you the flexibility to use it on both hands. Overall, the Yaesu MHG-1 Carry Handle is a convenient, affordable, and stylish accessory for your radio, making it a worthy addition to any Yaesu FT-450D.

🔗Stahlin Electrical Products' Smooth Carry Handle


https://preview.redd.it/akyf92us3d1d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=79e3e566fd360f6e32e6036b3a826dc70537fcc7
I recently added the Stahlin Rech109506 Encl Carry Handle to my collection of electrical products, and let me tell you, it's made a real difference in my daily life. You know how frustrating it can be, lugging around cumbersome enclosures without a proper handle? This rech109506 handle has been a game-changer.
The first thing I noticed was the smooth finish. No more rough edges, just a seamless grip that's comfortable and secure. It's like having a red dot sight on your carry handle, making it so much easier to spot and grab when you're in a hurry.
Of course, no product is perfect. Sometimes, the handle can be a little slippery when my hands are moist. But overall, the Stahlin Enclosure Carry Handle has been a reliable addition to my toolkit. And hey, in the world of electrical products, that's saying something!

🔗Strike Extended Latch Charging Handle for AR15/AR10 Rifles


https://preview.redd.it/j1wnuy1t3d1d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=41b9246a95c7674a4445a9deb57dcafdfd669f72
The Strike Industries ARCH-EL Charging Handle is an upgrade from the standard one that comes with your rifle. This hard-anodized charging handle not only looks good but works even better. The larger latch surface makes it more versatile, especially in challenging conditions, and the high-polished finish provides a smooth charging experience.
Built to last, it's a great option if you're planning to invest in a high-quality, durable charging handle. It's worth mentioning, the charging handle might smell a bit rough initially after installation, you just need to give it a little break-in time and a cleaning for a smooth experience.
The finish may also come off on the top and one side after minimal use, but overall, it's a great, affordable product that gets the job done.

🔗Mil Spec AR-15 Carry Handle Assembly


https://preview.redd.it/9tezcagt3d1d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5dfa8b30e33a71bdda7845232795078c9fb6ebbf
I recently got my hands on the LBE Unlimited ARCHAS Mlspc, a Mil Spec carry handle assembly designed for the AR-15. This bad boy is made right here in the USA, which is awesome. When I took it out of the box, the assembly was pretty straightforward, and it fit my AR-15 like a glove. The build quality is sturdy, and it definitely feels like something that would last.
One feature I loved was the inclusion of an American flag etched into the handle. It's a great patriotic touch. As for any downsides, the thumb screws and securing plate don't quite match the rest of the assembly in terms of color. However, I wouldn't say this is a deal-breaker.
Overall, I'm quite pleased with this LBE Unlimited ARCHAS Mlspc. It's a solid product that's made with pride and quality in mind. But don't forget to factor in the slightly higher price tag, as it might not be the most budget-friendly option out there.

Buyer's Guide

Welcome to the buyer's guide for Carry Handle Red Dot. This guide is designed to help you understand the key features, considerations, and general advice to assist you in making an informed decision when purchasing a Carry Handle Red Dot. We will be focusing on the product category as a whole, without mentioning specific products or external resources. Let's get started!

Important Features


https://preview.redd.it/8u6e2oqw3d1d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f53502709c584a5c6c7b63a7d3b0fe823fe29eee
  • Red dot optic: A red dot sight allows for rapid target acquisition and quick adjustments, making it ideal for close to medium-range shooting applications.
  • Carry handle mount: This type of mount attaches to the rear sight of a rifle, allowing you to quickly detach or change the red dot sight while keeping the main scope intact.
  • Adjustable brightness control: Ensuring you have the right level of brightness for your shooting environment is crucial, and most models offer variable brightness to provide flexibility and comfort.

Additional Considerations

  • Durability: Ensure the model you choose can withstand normal wear and tear, as well as being water and fog resistant.
  • Size: Consider the overall size of the red dot sight, as well as its weight, to ensure it's comfortable and practical for you to use in your shooting environment.
  • Battery life: Some red dot sights require batteries to function, so make sure to consider the expected battery life of the model you're interested in purchasing.

General Advice

Prioritize your needs and preferences in terms of features, size, and battery life. Opt for a model that suits your budget, shooting preferences, and application. It's essential to choose a high-quality Carry Handle Red Dot that meets your requirements and provides a smooth, reliable experience during your shooting activities.
We hope this buyer's guide has been informative and helpful in your search for the perfect Carry Handle Red Dot. Remember to prioritize the features, considerations, and advice presented in this guide to ensure you make the best possible decision for your needs. Happy shopping!

https://preview.redd.it/untlgbhx3d1d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a67fe6bc18ec263762cc3339b89df08cbfc9b8f7

FAQ

What is a Carry Handle Red Dot?

A Carry Handle Red Dot is a type of optical sight that mounts onto a firearm, typically a handgun or shotgun, to assist the shooter in acquiring their target quickly and accurately. The sight utilizes a red dot or reticle that is visible through the lens, providing a simplified aiming point.

Why should I choose a Carry Handle Red Dot?


https://preview.redd.it/onzk5dpx3d1d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=77f9c5833a328a36cf256d6e84d5e9f8753b5403
Carry Handle Red Dots are versatile and easy to use, making them a popular choice for many shooters. They provide a quick, accurate sight picture that can be used in a variety of shooting scenarios, including close-range and long-range engagements. Additionally, many Carry Handle Red Dots feature adjustable brightness settings, allowing users to tailor the sight to their specific lighting conditions.

How do I install a Carry Handle Red Dot on my firearm?

  • Consult your firearm's manual or the manufacturer's instructions to ensure proper installation. Most Carry Handle Red Dots utilize a picatinny rail system, which allows for quick and easy attachment to your firearm.
  • Align the sight with the firearm's front and rear sights, ensuring they are properly aligned for accurate shooting.
  • Tighten any necessary screws or securing mechanisms to hold the sight in place, then test your firearm to ensure the sight is functioning correctly.

What are the difference between Carry Handle Red Dot and other types of red dot sights?

The main difference is in the mounting configuration. While most red dot sights use a weaver mount, Carry Handle Red Dots mount directly onto the firearm's carry handle. This allows for a lower profile and a more streamlined appearance, which some users may prefer.

https://preview.redd.it/i2j46x8y3d1d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7b880e5115b5133220fb247ff9234ea7f085c167

Can I use a Carry Handle Red Dot for hunting?

Yes, Carry Handle Red Dots can be an excellent choice for hunting in many situations. They provide a fast, accurate sight picture that can help you quickly acquire and engage your target. However, it is essential to choose the right model for your specific hunting scenario, taking factors such as brightness settings, lens quality, and reticle size into consideration.

Is a Carry Handle Red Dot durable and reliable?

High-quality Carry Handle Red Dots are designed to be both durable and reliable. They typically feature sturdy construction and weatherproof materials to withstand various environmental conditions. The battery life of the sight can vary depending on the model and brightness settings, but most can provide several hours of continuous use.

What are some popular brands and models of Carry Handle Red Dots?

  • TruGlo TRUGLO Tru-Dot Red Dot Sight
  • Vortex Optics SPARC AR 2 MOA Red Dot Sight
  • Holosun 503G - Micro Red Dot Sight
  • SIG Sauer REDdot 1x20mm Miniature Sight
  • Burris FastFire II 3 MOA Red Dot Sight

How much do Carry Handle Red Dots typically cost?

The cost of Carry Handle Red Dots can vary depending on the brand, model, and features. Generally, they range in price from around $100 to $500. However, it's essential to do your research and consider the specific needs of your shooting scenario to ensure you're getting the best value for your money.

What is the warranty on a Carry Handle Red Dot?

Warranties for Carry Handle Red Dots can vary depending on the manufacturer. Generally, they range from one to five years and may cover defects in materials or workmanship. It's essential to read the specific warranty terms provided by the manufacturer to understand what is covered and for how long.

Are there any accessories or upgrades available for Carry Handle Red Dots?

Yes, many accessory manufacturers offer various upgrades and accessories for Carry Handle Red Dots, including different reticle styles, lens covers, and mounting solutions. These can help customize your sight to better suit your specific shooting needs.
As an Amazon™ Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
submitted by Count-Daring243 to u/Count-Daring243 [link] [comments]


2024.05.19 08:56 Count-Daring243 Best Carbon Fiber Bipod

Best Carbon Fiber Bipod

https://preview.redd.it/g9r5aix8zb1d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1065dc42814ba8aa4cac21f6ee10240c7518f2c4
Welcome to our roundup article on the Carbon Fiber Bipod! If you're in search of a reliable and sturdy accessory for your gun, we've got you covered. In this article, we'll be diving into the world of carbon fiber bipods and showcasing our top picks for the best bipods on the market. So, buckle up and get ready to find your perfect match!

The Top 18 Best Carbon Fiber Bipod

  1. Compact, Lightweight AR 10 Bipod with No Assembly Required - Experience unmatched precision and ease of use with the compact, lightweight Champion Bipod, suitable for AR 10 rifles, featuring spring-loaded legs and quick sling swivel attachment.
  2. High-Quality HD-50 Bipod for 50 BMG Rifles - The Accu-Tac HD-50 Bipod, crafted for 50 BMG platforms, features larger arm lock lugs, adjustable tension, canting motion, and nine-position leg height options, catering to larger heavy rifles with unmatched stability and strength.
  3. Adjustable Heavy Duty AR-10 Bipod with Precision Leg Locks - Tac Shield Heavy Duty Pivoting Bi-Pod: Adjustable 6in-9in - Superior side-to-side swivel, secure variable length adjustment, and fast extension for ultimate precision and stability.
  4. Swagger Hunter29 Bipod: Versatile AR 10 Bipod for Maximum Shooting Agility - Swagger Hunter29 Bipod: The ultimate all-terrain shooting solution for confident, fluid long-range shooting in any rugged terrain or terrain type.
  5. Steady AR 10 Bipod with Traversing Technology - Experience ultimate stability and precision with the Champion Bipod's innovative traversing technology, perfect for versatile firearm support in various hunting scenarios.
  6. Adjustable AR 10 Bipod with 60-degree Pan Movement - Experience ultimate precision with the F.A.B. Defense Spike - Bi-Pod Pic Mount Black, featuring smart hybrid construction, 4 locking leg positions, an adjustable rotating head, and a wide range of pan and tilt movement.
  7. Swagger Extreme Angle AR Bipod for Hunting Performance - Upgrade your shooting experience with the Swagger Sea12 Extreme Angle Bipod, designed for stability and durability in extreme angle shooting situations.
  8. TraverseTrack Bipod for Sling Swivel Connection - Capture moving targets with ease using Blackhawk's Sportster TraverseTrack Bipod, featuring a durable all-metal construction, horizontal traverse, and pivot action for level shooting on uneven terrain.
  9. Accu-Tac FC-5 G2 F-Class Bipod for Long-Range Shooting - The Accu-Tac FC-5 G2 Arca Spec Bipod offers versatility and accuracy for long-range shooting, with 4 leg positions, 9 height options, and adjustable cant and pan features, making it a top choice for AR 10 Bipod enthusiasts.
  10. UTG Pro Recon 360 TL 7-9" MLOK Bipod: 360-Degree Swivel, Adjustable Height, and Nonslip Rubberized Foot Pads - The UTG Pro Recon 360 TL 7-9" MLOK Bipod offers unparalleled stability and customization with its 360-degree swivel base, adjustable legs, and lockable leg extensions, making it a top choice for AR 10 enthusiasts.
  11. Heavy Duty AR-10 Adjustable Swivel Bipod - Experience unparalleled precision and durability with the Tac Shield Heavy Duty Pivoting Bi-Pod, expertly designed for uneven terrain and secure adjustments to ensure accurate shots on your AR 10 Bipod.
  12. Advanced Portable Sling Stud Bipod with Switcheroo System - Experience unmatched stability, versatility, and portability with the BOG Adrenaline Switcheroo Bipod - the ultimate hunting companion for any situation.
  13. UTG Recon Flex II Keymod Bipod - Compact, Lightweight, and Versatile Hunting Accessory - UTG Recon Flex II Bipod offers a reliable and versatile shooting solution with quick height adjustment, easy deployment, and a durable, lightweight design for ultimate flexibility and accuracy in any shooting scenario.
  14. Adjustable Ruger 10/22 Bipod for Precision Shooting - The UTG Bipod Recon 360 TL offers center height adjustability, aluminum construction, and lockable leg extensions, making it a reliable choice for Ruger 10/22 fans seeking a versatile accessory for their rifle.
  15. High-Quality Carbon Fiber Bipod for Stable Outdoor Support - Experience the ultimate in shooting stability with the Primos Polecat Bipod Tall, combining strength-to-weight ratio, durability, and silient adjustments in a perfectly crafted, Made in America bipod.
  16. Carbon Fiber Bipod with Open Thumb-Release for Surveying - Seco's 5219-03 Carbon Fiber Thumb-Release Bipod provides a durable and easy-to-use solution for setting up freestanding GPS antennas or prism poles, with adjustable leg extensions up to 6 feet and a no-crush bipod head for added strength and reliability.
  17. Carbon Fiber Adjustable Bipod for Optimal Shooting Experience - Experience enhanced stability and unmatched adjustability with the Truglo Carbon Tac-Pod M-Lok/Kmod 9-13 in., featuring carbon-fiber legs and a pivoting base.
  18. Accushot BT72 Carbon Fiber Bipod: Versatile and Secure Rifle Mount - Experience the ultimate shooting precision with Accushot BT72 Super Cal Atlas Bipods, featuring a height range of 5.6 to 10.8 inches, 45-degree preloaded cant, easily adjustable leg positions, non-rotating outer legs, and a lightweight design.
As an Amazon™ Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Reviews

🔗Compact, Lightweight AR 10 Bipod with No Assembly Required


https://preview.redd.it/ogj9v9g9zb1d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=bdaabec5489c5a52ba167313ac6b7bd32865ce3f
The Champion Bipod is a must-have for all AR 10 enthusiasts. I've been using it for a few months now, and it has definitely enhanced my firearm experience. Firstly, the bipod is incredibly easy to attach to the gun, with just a quick installation to the sling swivel stud. And, what I particularly love is that there's literally no assembly required, making it perfect for those who aren't handy with tools.
The telescoping legs are a major highlight. Their spring-load return means you can easily extend and retract the legs, ensuring quick and easy height adjustment. But, I do have to admit that while the bipod adds extra stability, it does make the gun feel a bit heavier.
However, despite its lightweight design, the bipod itself is surprisingly sturdy and durable. It's capable of handling the recoil of my AR 10 and maintaining its rigidity. It does lack the ability to swivel, though, which does make it somewhat limited in its flexibility.
Overall, the Champion Bipod is a solid purchase for anyone looking to add extra stability and precision to their rifle. Even though it does come with a few shortcomings, it still offers great value for money and performance.

🔗High-Quality HD-50 Bipod for 50 BMG Rifles


https://preview.redd.it/yoiw8qu9zb1d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0d12bb9309b2d0ec0811fc4e94bbcd5cf6fb2abf
I recently tried the Accu-Tac HD-50 Bipod Black, and let me tell you, it's a sturdy and reliable companion for any shooting enthusiast. This bipod is specifically designed for heavy-duty rifles, with a center hub that offers great stability and strength. The larger arm lock lugs ensure it can withstand the recoil of a 50 BMG, which is definitely appreciated. One of the standout features for me was the ability to cant and the throw lever, which makes adjustments a breeze.
The only downside I encountered was that the product description didn't explicitly mention whether the bipod had the ability to cant or not. This left me to figure it out once I had the product in hand. But overall, I'm quite pleased with this sturdy, heavy-duty bipod that will be a trusty addition to my shooting gear.

🔗Adjustable Heavy Duty AR-10 Bipod with Precision Leg Locks


https://preview.redd.it/msyilk6azb1d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=47d9bc9a7e98ed1d95d2bb8a137fbfe5a7ebef97
Imagine you're out on the range, adjusting the angle of your AR 10 on unpredictable terrain. As you take aim, you're grateful for the Tac Shield Heavy Duty Bi-Pod.
Its side-to-side swivel capabilities feel as natural as a seasoned shooter, and that quick adjustment lever? . A game-changer.
The precision leg locks offer a sure grip, no matter how uneven the surface. Its legs extend quickly and lock in place with an ease that's unmatched.
Even better are the grip caps on the bottom - they hold steady, providing the perfect rest for a steady shot. And, when it's time to retract, the spring return release buttons make it a breeze.
Now, you see why this Heavy Duty Bi-Pod has a 5-star rating. It's not just a tool, it's an essential part of your shooting experience.

🔗Swagger Hunter29 Bipod: Versatile AR 10 Bipod for Maximum Shooting Agility


https://preview.redd.it/q2y1iznazb1d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ef3a829b48aa3f006d765b8240229b10ff31aa36
I recently had the chance to try out the Swagger Hunter29 bipod, and let me tell you, it did not disappoint. The moment I assembled it, I was struck by its lightweight design, which weighed in at just 23.6 ounces.
One standout feature for me was the easy removal of the rubber foot to reveal the spiked foot, allowing me to dig into my terrain with ease. The leg design and internal updates from 2018 also impressed me, as they provided a much smoother shooting experience. The nitride finish on the springs and spring housing was a nice touch, adding an extra layer of durability.
As someone who appreciates versatility in their gear, I was excited to see that this bipod came with a reinforced bungee and a standard rifle adapter. Its compatibility with a wide range of shooting positions, from prone to seated to kneeling, added to my confidence in its performance.
Overall, the Swagger Hunter29 bipod proved to be a solid choice for hunters and shooters alike. Its ability to adapt to various terrains and obstacles helped me feel confident in my shots, and its lightweight design made it easy to carry along. While there may be some minor drawbacks to the setup process, the benefits of using this bipod far outweigh them. I wholeheartedly recommend the Swagger Hunter29 to anyone in search of a reliable and versatile shooting aid.

🔗Steady AR 10 Bipod with Traversing Technology


https://preview.redd.it/v0djlg2bzb1d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d744ec54754101137e8f57f013b2984e459c976e
As a fellow hunter, I recently had the chance to try out these Champion Bipods with cant & traverse, and I was quite impressed with the features they offered. The 9" to 13" horizontal rotation system proved to be a game-changer when it came to getting a steadfast hold on moving game. It's like having an extra set of eyes, as you can easily follow the game's movements without losing sight.
Though the rapid-adjust lever lock offers quick and easy positioning, I did notice that it could use some fine-tuning. However, I find the telescoping legs with spring return to be a fantastic addition, as they make it easy to attach to the sling swivel stud on your firearm. The steadiness of this bipod shines through, and it's not just for prone shots - it's also perfect for those benchrest or sitting situations.
For uneven terrain, the pivoting feature is a lifesaver. Though the product is made in China, its quality seems to mimic that of much higher-priced models. Overall, while there are some minor drawbacks, these bipods prove to be an excellent value for the price, and I'm sure they'll serve as an invaluable tool for hunters all around.

🔗Adjustable AR 10 Bipod with 60-degree Pan Movement


https://preview.redd.it/jahx0cmbzb1d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=677bb215af022ff763acab53e72c7c2b56b55c12
Recently, I tried out the FAB Defense Spike Tactical Bipod and let me tell you, it was a game-changer for my rifle setup. As someone who enjoys shooting at long distances, a bipod can make all the difference in keeping shots consistent and accurate.
One of the first things that stood out to me was its smart hybrid construction. It strikes the perfect balance between sturdiness and lightweight. This was amazing for me because I wanted a bipod that wouldn't slow me down while still offering stability.
The four locking leg positions were another major highlight. The flexibility to adjust the legs at 0, 45, 90, and 135 degrees allowed me to use it in different shooting situations with ease. I appreciated that it could be quickly adjusted for different heights and angles without any hassle.
The adjustable rotating head was another feature I loved. Its simple design ensured that my rifle remained steady, even when I needed to make quick changes on the fly. I also found the 60-degree pan movement and 20-degree tilt movement to be quite useful, providing me with a greater range of motion as I shot from various positions.
Despite loving most aspects of this bipod, there were a couple of drawbacks to mention. The first was that the legs, while sturdy, could feel a bit narrow at times, particularly when using heavy optics. The second was that extending or retracting them required a bit more force than I'd have expected, but that's a small price to pay for the overall stability this bipod provides.
Overall, the FAB Defense Spike Precision Bipod exceeded my expectations. It offers a sturdy build, is lightweight, and has features that make it a reliable and flexible addition to any rifle. Sure, there may be some minor drawbacks, but for the price range, it's a steal for shooters looking to improve their accuracy and make their shooting experience more enjoyable.

🔗Swagger Extreme Angle AR Bipod for Hunting Performance


https://preview.redd.it/jabddjzbzb1d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=06a18e5153b76e237c79b35d7b68e47ceb189488
This Swagger SEA12 Shooter Extreme Angle Bipod is a piece of equipment I've grown quite fond of lately. Picture this - I'm out in the wild, hunting for big game. With its 9-12 inch height adjustability, it provides a stable shooting platform for those critical moments, especially when dealing with those pesky angles.
What I particularly appreciate about this bipod is its overmolded flex-ready joint. It's like having an extra grip of confidence, knowing that my shot won't be compromised by the slightest wobble. And it's designed to be adaptable, so no matter the angle, you'll always have a steady hand.
It's not all smooth sailing though. As with any gadget, there's always a learning curve, and it took me a bit of time to get the hang of mounting it onto my Picatinny rail. But once I figured it out, it was game on.
All in all, if you're hunting or shooting in situations where angles play a significant role, this Swagger SEA12 Shooter Extreme Angle Bipod is a worthy investment. It's robust, reliable, and can be your companion through those thrilling moments in the wild.

🔗TraverseTrack Bipod for Sling Swivel Connection


https://preview.redd.it/q6bftvjczb1d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3b490720b46989f9b3e30473d2fc0d383bf50436
Lately, I've been using the Blackhawk Sportster TraverseTrack Bipod, and I must say, it's been quite a game changer for me. The bipod has been incredibly helpful during my practice sessions and even made life simpler while tracking my targets.
First and foremost, the sturdy all-metal construction of the bipod has been quite impressive. It carries a robust and durable vibe that makes me feel safe and confident while holding it. The tubular legs have always been steady, even when the targets started to move. Its horizontal traverse allows me to make smooth, steady movements with minimal effort.
What I've found particularly useful is the pivot action feature. It makes it seamless to level my gun when I'm shooting on uneven terrains, thus providing a dependable and consistent shooting experience without any hassle. The leg adjustment is just a breeze with the help of the rapid-adjust lever lock. The legs automatically return to their upright position whenever I need them to be, which has been a genuine relief.
The ability to attach this bipod to my sling swivel stud has also been a significant win. It's straightforward, and the convenience and maneuverability it brings into play are noteworthy.
However, despite these upsides, I've also had a few gripes. For one, I found the legs to be just a little too fragile at the locking tabs. I don't know if it's a manufacturing issue or if I just had bad luck, but both tabs broke within a week. I had to resort to using some blue loc tite to fix the issue, which was an inconvenience.
Secondly, I do wish the legs were a bit longer, to make it more suitable for my needs in certain shooting positions. The existing one sometimes feels a bit too short for what I had in mind.
Lastly, this one might just be a me thing, but I felt it could be a bit lighter, especially when carrying it around for long. It's not a major issue, but it would have been a pleasant addition for sure.
Overall, the Blackhawk Sportster TraverseTrack Bipod has been a valuable addition to my arsenal. It boasts of a number of convenient features that have significantly enhanced my shooting experience, but like any other mechanical contraption, not every aspect has been perfect.

🔗Accu-Tac FC-5 G2 F-Class Bipod for Long-Range Shooting


https://preview.redd.it/08a3fnyczb1d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c5e1ce5ad871e57151e19300e0f994f8e3b39a92
I've been using the Accu-Tac FC-5 G2 Arca Spec Bipod for a few weeks now, and let me tell you, it's a game-changer. This F-Class bipod is incredibly versatile, perfect for long-range target shooting, competitions, and even airgun use. It's a bit more expensive than your usual bipods, but trust me, it's worth every penny.
The one feature that stood out to me the most is how stable this bipod is. It allows the rifle to sit between your legs, which ensures accuracy and reduces movement from recoil. It's even suitable for AR 10 Bipod applications, but you don't have to limit yourself to those.
One thing I noticed was that the cant adjustment lever can be repositioned, but don't use a tool to tighten the tension. Other than that, I've been really impressed with how easy it is to deploy the leg positions and how secure it is when locked in place. I'll definitely consider this option next time I'm looking for a bipod.

🔗UTG Pro Recon 360 TL 7-9" MLOK Bipod: 360-Degree Swivel, Adjustable Height, and Nonslip Rubberized Foot Pads


https://preview.redd.it/u0nzb5fdzb1d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=039234688867cbdc6dc145c1c33bf41a18cf4ecd
As a reviewer, I've been using the UTG Pro Recon bipod for a while now, and it has been quite an experience. I particularly enjoy the fact that it's adjustable both in height and swivel, allowing me to set up the most stable platform for my rifle.
The 3-position folding legs come in handy when I need to pack up quickly, and the lockable leg extensions ensure security. However, the rubber feet at the end of the legs do slip a bit on some surfaces, which can be quite annoying. Despite the minor inconvenience, the bipod has proven to be a reliable piece of gear, providing the stability and versatility I need for my shooting adventures.

🔗Heavy Duty AR-10 Adjustable Swivel Bipod


https://preview.redd.it/p4hqzntdzb1d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5deb7796b5a51f5ff8799503de8f3ee056d545db
I recently tried out the Tac Shield Heavy Duty Pivoting Bi-Pod, and honestly, it's been a game-changer in my shooting setup. The adjustable shooting heights make it perfect for uneven terrain, thanks to the pivoting design and quick adjustment pivot lever. The precision tension leg locks are a nice touch, ensuring a secure fit no matter what surface I'm on.
What really stood out to me, though, were the reinforced tension springs. These bad boys have made a significant difference when it comes to durability. I love how sturdy and reliable they feel, and I can tell that they're built to last. The ribbed grip caps on the bottom legs also add a touch of convenience, providing a steady and secure rest whenever I need it.
The spring assist leg retraction feature is fantastic too - it makes it incredibly easy to retract the legs, and the spring return release buttons ensure a quick and positive retraction every time. All in all, this Tac Shield Heavy Duty Pivoting Bi-Pod has definitely become a staple in my shooting gear. Highly recommended!

🔗Advanced Portable Sling Stud Bipod with Switcheroo System


https://preview.redd.it/0w0pgo5ezb1d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=fccd0c7f92b608186859c8a7ea861e83bca4977d
This BOG Adrenaline Switcheroo Bipod has been the perfect addition to my arsenal lately, providing that extra support for my gun when needed. One thing I particularly love is the high-density foam grips, which not only make it comfortable to hold but also ensure a firm and secure grip even in unexpected situations.
However, there are a couple of minor drawbacks. Although the rotating head lets me shoot from various angles, it can sometimes be a bit slow when deploying the bipod in a hurry. Additionally, the product description mentioned a Switcheroo system, but I wasn't quite sure what that was about, as I haven't had much occasion to change my optics while using this bipod.
Overall, I'm quite happy with this bipod and how it's performed for me in my hunting endeavors so far. It's lightweight, incredibly stable, and the high-density foam grips ensure a comfortable yet firm grip. This bipod has definitely made my hunting experiences more enjoyable and successful.

Buyer's Guide

Welcome to the buyer's guide for carbon fiber bipods! If you're a hunter, shooter, or outdoor enthusiast in search of a sturdy yet lightweight bipod, you've landed in the right place. In this guide, we will go over essential features to consider and provide advice to help you make the best purchase for your needs.

Key Features to Consider

  • Durability and Build Quality
  • Weight and Portability
  • Height Adjustability
  • Stability and Quick-Detach Options
  • Leg Angle and Pan Function

https://preview.redd.it/j9bbkeohzb1d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e430e63a31398f595bf4a7cd4b4b9d35f0d931ef

1. Durability and Build Quality

Carbon fiber is a high-strength, lightweight material that is ideal for outdoor gear. In bipods, carbon fiber construction can withstand wear and tear from rough terrain and harsh weather conditions. Investing in a bipod made from quality carbon fiber will ensure long-lasting performance.

2. Weight and Portability

Lightweight design is a key advantage of carbon fiber bipods. A portable and lightweight bipod not only makes your hunting or shooting experience more enjoyable, but it also reduces fatigue over long days in the field. Many carbon fiber bipods also offer easy-to-use quick-detach options, simplifying transitions between shooting positions.

3. Height Adjustability

Being able to adjust the bipod's height to suit your needs is crucial. Look for a bipod with a solid locking mechanism that allows for smooth and precise height adjustments. A good range of adjustability will help you achieve optimal stability and comfort with your shooting stance.

https://preview.redd.it/a38sgp8izb1d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e6185e139fe6a1faeb6dc0e0e7cdca6a3407748b

4. Stability and Quick-Detach Options

A reliable and stable bipod is essential for accurate shots. Some features that contribute to stability include a heavy-duty mount, wide legs, and locking mechanisms that secure the legs in place. Quick-detach options, such as a twist-lock system or spring-loaded hinges, make it easy to mount and dismount your bipod without sacrificing stability.

5. Leg Angle and Pan Function

Two critical features for a carbon fiber bipod are the leg angle and pan function. Leg angle adjustments allow you to fine-tune the bipod's position relative to your shooting angle, ensuring maximum stability and accuracy. A pan function allows you to lock the bipod's legs in a fixed position, which is perfect for stable shooting scenarios or when transitioning between stations.

General Advice and Considerations

  • Consider your shooting needs and habits – if you often switch between different shooting positions or need a versatile bipod, look for a model with a quick-detach option and adjustable leg angles.
  • Consider the environment you'll be using the bipod in – rugged carbon fiber construction and durability are important if you'll be shooting in harsh weather conditions or rough terrain.
  • Check the product specifications for weight and build quality – a high-quality, lightweight carbon fiber bipod will offer the best performance for its weight.
  • Examine the warranty and customer support policies of potential purchases – reliable customer support is essential for resolving any issues you may encounter.
Now that you are familiar with the key features of carbon fiber bipods and have received our general advice, you're well-equipped to make an informed purchase. Remember, the best choice depends on your individual needs and preferences, so we recommend trying out different options before settling on the perfect carbon fiber bipod for you.

https://preview.redd.it/hbc3e0rizb1d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=840fee991391fc20a4adfc2e5029f61ebb3d4d0d

FAQ

What is a Carbon Fiber Bipod?

A Carbon Fiber Bipod is a shooting accessory designed to provide stability and support for rifles during long-range shooting. Made from carbon fiber, it is lightweight, durable, and strong.

What are the benefits of using a Carbon Fiber Bipod?

The benefits of using a Carbon Fiber Bipod include increased stability and accuracy, reduced fatigue during long shooting sessions, and quick deployment and adjustment.

https://preview.redd.it/skrrx5bjzb1d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=8746ac37acbbf3f800c8b7e422f089c6eb258e02

How much do Carbon Fiber Bipods typically cost?

The cost of Carbon Fiber Bipods varies depending on the brand, features, and length. Generally, they can range from around $150 to $500 or higher.

What are the different types of Carbon Fiber Bipods?

There are several types of Carbon Fiber Bipods, including fixed-height bipods, adjustable-height bipods, and tactical bipods. Each type offers different features and benefits to suit the needs of different shooters.

What are the key features to look for when choosing a Carbon Fiber Bipod?

  • Durability: Look for bipods made from high-quality carbon fiber for strength and durability.
  • Adjustability: Consider whether you need a fixed or adjustable-height bipod, and look for models that offer easy and smooth adjustment.
  • Weight: Choose a bipod that is lightweight, but still sturdy enough to support your rifle.
  • Leg angles: Ensure the bipod you choose has adjustable leg angles to suit your shooting position and terrain.
  • Mounting options: Consider whether you need a swivel or panning mount, and ensure the bipod is compatible with your rifle's mounting system.

Are Carbon Fiber Bipods easy to set up and adjust?

Yes, most Carbon Fiber Bipods are designed to be easy to set up and adjust, with quick-release mechanisms and easy-to-use leg angle adjustments.

How do I choose the right height for my Carbon Fiber Bipod?

To choose the right height for your Carbon Fiber Bipod, consider your shooting style and the terrain you will be shooting on. Generally, a higher bipod height is better for longer shots, while a lower height is better for close-range shooting.

Can I use a Carbon Fiber Bipod with any rifle?

While most Carbon Fiber Bipods are compatible with a wide range of rifles, it is always best to check the manufacturer's specifications to ensure compatibility with your particular rifle.

What is the warranty for Carbon Fiber Bipods?

The warranty for Carbon Fiber Bipods varies depending on the brand and model. Generally, they offer a limited warranty covering defects in materials or workmanship, and may also cover damage during normal use.
As an Amazon™ Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
submitted by Count-Daring243 to u/Count-Daring243 [link] [comments]


2024.05.19 03:16 Affectionate_Poet280 A New Way to Explain How a Model Works

I was explaining my personal project (creating a Variational Autoencoder for raw audio as a core for several audio models I need) to someone, and they were a bit confused about how AI works in general. I realized that simplifying it with a relatable example might help.
Think back to high school when you learned how to find a function from data. For instance:
Imagine you have an object thrown into the air, and you record its height at different points in time. With this data, you can create a parabolic function that approximates the object's height at any given moment. In mathematical terms, this function is a model that predicts the height based on time.
Now, think of AI training in a similar way, but with more complexity. Training an AI model is essentially finding a function that fits a lot of data with many variables. Instead of just height and time, an AI model might use thousands or even millions of data points and parameters.
In the case of the parabolic function, you determine the coefficients (a, b, and c) that best fit your data. For AI, the process involves adjusting many parameters through linear algebra and statistics to find the best fit. The training method is guided by algorithms that optimize these parameters to minimize errors, similar to how you'd minimize the difference between your parabolic function and the actual data points.
So, while the analogy isn't perfect, it helps to understand that AI models are just complex functions derived from data (not just compression, or a search function), much like how you derived the parabolic function from the height and time data.
It won't resonate with everyone, especially since many people only use basic arithmetic (+-*/), but I hope this explanation helps those who haven't had their "aha" moment with other explanations.
submitted by Affectionate_Poet280 to aiwars [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 22:29 Tesa_Tesanovic1988 Unlocking FDI potential in growth markets with RWA tokenization

Unlocking FDI potential in growth markets with RWA tokenization
Foreign direct investment (FDI) is a driving force behind economic growth. Four experts in the field – Henrik von Scheel, Paul Lalovich, Emilija Vukovic, and Tesha Teshanovich – outline how the innovative concepts of FDI-as-a-service and real world asset (RWA) tokenization can help growth markets beef up their FDI attractiveness.
The primary objective of FDI is to secure capital for investment. When conducive conditions are in place, FDI has the potential to foster job creation and sustainable development by enhancing an economy's productive capacity.
Still, regulatory hurdles, political instability, currency fluctuations, economic uncertainties, infrastructure limitations, cultural differences, and legal issues often hinder this goal.
https://preview.redd.it/a4vajp7uv81d1.jpg?width=900&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=cb84d502fc0753f00532cff2fdbbac0fbe57ecb4
Overcoming the obstacles of FDI requires innovative solutions that address the needs of investors, companies, and regulators. By engaging with local suppliers and forming partnerships with domestic businesses, foreign-owned companies can create additional benefits for the host economy, such as productivity spillovers through various channels.
According to FDI Markets, companies worldwide announced over $1.33 trillion worth of greenfield foreign direct investment in 2023, marking an increase of nearly 4% from the previous year.

The growth markets opportunity

We consider growth markets among the most undervalued asset classes worldwide, characterized by strong and improving earnings growth and financial metrics such as return on equity, free cash flow yield, and dividend yield. These markets benefit from an economic growth advantage over developed ones, with growth rates in emerging economies outpacing those in developed markets.
This growth trend is not solely reliant on China; other factors contribute, resulting in an upward trajectory for economic growth in growth markets while growth in developed markets decelerates. Globally, growth economies have typically rebounded from the global financial crisis faster than more advanced economies. Consequently, it's unsurprising that companies in developed nations are increasingly seeking avenues to expand their presence abroad.
This quest for new growth opportunities has brought attention to foreign direct investment policies worldwide, offering a promising outlook for investors.
According to the research conducted by Kearney, findings indicate a strong sense of investor optimism, with the potential for further growth over the next three years. A high percentage of respondents stated their intentions to boost their foreign direct investment in the coming years, and most expressed the view that FDI would play a more critical role in enhancing their corporate profitability and competitiveness over the next three years.
The realization of FDI advantages also hinges on the purpose behind the investment. Without responsible business practices and thorough research, FDI may lead to unintended consequences for the recipient nation. The presence of foreign multinational corporations can occasionally spark concerns regarding their potential social and environmental implications, particularly concerning the erosion of labor standards and their involvement in the unsustainable exploitation of natural resources.

Bringing FDI in

Challenges facing foreign direct investment include navigating complex regulatory frameworks, cultural differences, and political instability in some regions.
Developing countries encounter significant hurdles in attracting foreign direct investment, hindering their ability to fully capitalize on the associated benefits. In the past, developing countries have struggled to attract consistent foreign direct investment that could serve as a steady catalyst for economic growth, especially in sectors beyond oil and gas.
Additionally, foreign investors have shown restrained interest due to concerns regarding regulatory and political risks and shortcomings in economic fundamentals such as infrastructure and human capital. Investors in developed nations, where most private capital is concentrated, might lack familiarity with growth markets and developing economies. Consequently, the perceived risks associated with conducting business beyond their accustomed environment could lead to higher risk premiums.
This, in turn, has the potential to render projects non-bankable or non-viable for investors. However, developing nations should remain focused on enhancing the enabling environment. By doing so, they can attract greater private investment and ensure that these investments yield optimal outcomes and returns.
This, in turn, fosters a cycle of increased investment. To stimulate increased FDI in developing countries, mechanisms for de-risking are essential. De-risking involves reallocating, sharing, or mitigating the existing or potential risks linked to the investment.
In contrast, financial de-risking utilizes financial strategies to mitigate or diminish the risks linked with projects. This often entails public entities like donor governments, multilateral development banks, development financial institutions, and climate funds incentivizing private investors to invest capital by agreeing to assume a portion of the risk. De-risking can encompass various tactics, including debt, equity, and guarantees, distributing the risk among involved parties, or transferring it to a third party.

The operational framework

FDI has been increasingly utilized as a significant service for economic development, underscoring its crucial role in driving global economic growth and prosperity.
A critical aspect of this entails reimagining the operational framework – essentially redesigning the approach through which the country attracts foreign direct investment. In numerous transformations, countries may need to reconsider their fundamental approach to FDI attraction and reassess their value proposition: identifying the appropriate target investor segments to engage with, the incentives and services to provide, and the model that can optimize FDI inflows and economic benefits.
Moreover, FDI can act as a channel for the transfer of technology and aid in expediting digital transformation. It can enhance economic integration by bolstering access to global markets. Additionally, FDI plays a crucial role in supporting economies during and after economic downturns.
FDI as a service aims to outline the structure of tasks, responsibilities, and relationships between stakeholders, allowing for clear delineation of connections between its constituent investors and host countries. Providing foreign direct investment as a comprehensive, end-to-end service enhances the potential value realized in growth markets.
When executed effectively, this service facilitates seamless processes throughout the investment cycle, establishes methods for minimizing inefficiencies and maximizing effectiveness, sets standards for processes, integrates feedback mechanisms to encourage continual improvement, and optimizes handling of exceptions.
Although the potential for FDI spill-overs is widely recognized, it's important not to assume their positive impacts. The realization of FDI benefits in the host economy relies on various factors, including the competitiveness of local producers, the strategic decisions of foreign-owned firms, and the technological disparities between domestic and foreign-owned firms, thereby affecting the absorptive capacity of local producers.

FDI-as-a-service

This is where FDI-as-a-service comes in. This strategic approach involves top-down planning to optimize the outcomes of the investment portfolio by efficiently developing and delivering projects, with the aim to de-risk projects, scale investments, and optimize the overall outcome.
Providing FDI as a service through end-to-end solutions significantly leverages tokenization to transform and democratize foreign direct investment in growth markets.
Tokenization enables the fractional ownership of real-world assets, providing increased liquidity and democratizing access to sustainable investments for a wider range of investors. This process enhances asset management by enabling the automation and standardization of key operations through smart contracts.
Crucial steps such as compliance verifications, investor credential checks, and dividend distributions are automated, drastically reducing the burdens of manual documentation and inconsistent records. Blockchain technology facilitates rapid settlement, reducing risks associated with counterparty transactions. Its transparency and traceability ensure that each transaction is logged, simplifying audits and enhancing accountability, which in turn helps prevent fraud and strengthens transactional integrity.
The efficiencies gained through tokenization make the markets more accessible, lowering minimum investment sizes, diminishing geographical barriers, and allowing a wider range of participants. This increases both market volume and liquidity. Tokenization also supports nearly instantaneous settlements, further enhancing liquidity and benefiting both investors and traders.
By converting tangible and intangible assets into digital tokens, tokenization revolutionizes access to investments. It allows for fractional ownership, enabling the division of high-value assets into smaller, more affordable units. This transformation opens up investment opportunities to a broader, more diverse audience, democratizing access and reducing entry barriers, making it an ideal strategy for attracting FDI into emerging markets.

Tokenization on the blockchain

Tokenization of real-world assets, as part of FDI-as-a-service, involves converting tangible and intangible assets into digital tokens on a blockchain. These assets can include traditional ones like real estate, agricultural products, mining commodities, financial assets like equities and bonds, or even intellectual properties such as digital art.
This process may involve assets that are simultaneously represented in traditional record systems (off-chain), or those exclusively managed on the blockchain (on-chain). The tokenization process generally unfolds in four essential steps, each critical to ensuring the asset's successful digital representation and integration into growth markets through FDI services.
Tokenization of real-world assets as part of FDI-as-a-service boasts significant advantages, notably the democratization of access which potentially enhances liquidity through the fractionalization of assets, or the division of ownership into smaller, more manageable shares. This process can simplify previously labor-intensive manual procedures, reducing costs and making investment opportunities accessible to smaller investors within certain asset classes.
Nonetheless, regulatory constraints may limit access to these investments, often restricting tokenized assets to accredited investors. Although fractionalization enhances liquidity and is an attractive proposition, the distribution of tokenized assets must achieve a much larger scale to fully realize true democratization of access.
Furthermore, in the context of FDI as a service, the blockchain technology underlying the tokenization of real-world assets ensures complete transparency and immutability regarding ownership, transactions, and crucial market data, all verifiable by any participant.
We are confident in the future of tokenized assets. One estimate suggests the market could even grow 30-fold by 2030, when it may reach a value of over $28 trillion.Foreign direct investment (FDI) is a driving force behind economic growth. Four experts in the field – Henrik von Scheel, Paul Lalovich, Emilija Vukovic, and Tesha Teshanovich – outline how the innovative concepts of FDI-as-a-service and real world asset (RWA) tokenization can help growth markets beef up their FDI attractiveness. The primary objective of FDI is to secure capital for investment. When conducive conditions are in place, FDI has the potential to foster job creation and sustainable development by enhancing an economy's productive capacity. Still, regulatory hurdles, political instability, currency fluctuations, economic uncertainties, infrastructure limitations, cultural differences, and legal issues often hinder this goal.
Overcoming the obstacles of FDI requires innovative solutions that address the needs of investors, companies, and regulators. By engaging with local suppliers and forming partnerships with domestic businesses, foreign-owned companies can create additional benefits for the host economy, such as productivity spillovers through various channels. According to FDI Markets, companies worldwide announced over $1.33 trillion worth of greenfield foreign direct investment in 2023, marking an increase of nearly 4% from the previous year. The growth markets opportunity We consider growth markets among the most undervalued asset classes worldwide, characterized by strong and improving earnings growth and financial metrics such as return on equity, free cash flow yield, and dividend yield. These markets benefit from an economic growth advantage over developed ones, with growth rates in emerging economies outpacing those in developed markets. This growth trend is not solely reliant on China; other factors contribute, resulting in an upward trajectory for economic growth in growth markets while growth in developed markets decelerates. Globally, growth economies have typically rebounded from the global financial crisis faster than more advanced economies. Consequently, it's unsurprising that companies in developed nations are increasingly seeking avenues to expand their presence abroad. This quest for new growth opportunities has brought attention to foreign direct investment policies worldwide, offering a promising outlook for investors. According to the research conducted by Kearney, findings indicate a strong sense of investor optimism, with the potential for further growth over the next three years. A high percentage of respondents stated their intentions to boost their foreign direct investment in the coming years, and most expressed the view that FDI would play a more critical role in enhancing their corporate profitability and competitiveness over the next three years. The realization of FDI advantages also hinges on the purpose behind the investment. Without responsible business practices and thorough research, FDI may lead to unintended consequences for the recipient nation. The presence of foreign multinational corporations can occasionally spark concerns regarding their potential social and environmental implications, particularly concerning the erosion of labor standards and their involvement in the unsustainable exploitation of natural resources. Bringing FDI in Challenges facing foreign direct investment include navigating complex regulatory frameworks, cultural differences, and political instability in some regions. Developing countries encounter significant hurdles in attracting foreign direct investment, hindering their ability to fully capitalize on the associated benefits. In the past, developing countries have struggled to attract consistent foreign direct investment that could serve as a steady catalyst for economic growth, especially in sectors beyond oil and gas. Additionally, foreign investors have shown restrained interest due to concerns regarding regulatory and political risks and shortcomings in economic fundamentals such as infrastructure and human capital. Investors in developed nations, where most private capital is concentrated, might lack familiarity with growth markets and developing economies. Consequently, the perceived risks associated with conducting business beyond their accustomed environment could lead to higher risk premiums. This, in turn, has the potential to render projects non-bankable or non-viable for investors. However, developing nations should remain focused on enhancing the enabling environment. By doing so, they can attract greater private investment and ensure that these investments yield optimal outcomes and returns. This, in turn, fosters a cycle of increased investment. To stimulate increased FDI in developing countries, mechanisms for de-risking are essential. De-risking involves reallocating, sharing, or mitigating the existing or potential risks linked to the investment. In contrast, financial de-risking utilizes financial strategies to mitigate or diminish the risks linked with projects. This often entails public entities like donor governments, multilateral development banks, development financial institutions, and climate funds incentivizing private investors to invest capital by agreeing to assume a portion of the risk. De-risking can encompass various tactics, including debt, equity, and guarantees, distributing the risk among involved parties, or transferring it to a third party. The operational framework FDI has been increasingly utilized as a significant service for economic development, underscoring its crucial role in driving global economic growth and prosperity. A critical aspect of this entails reimagining the operational framework – essentially redesigning the approach through which the country attracts foreign direct investment. In numerous transformations, countries may need to reconsider their fundamental approach to FDI attraction and reassess their value proposition: identifying the appropriate target investor segments to engage with, the incentives and services to provide, and the model that can optimize FDI inflows and economic benefits. Moreover, FDI can act as a channel for the transfer of technology and aid in expediting digital transformation. It can enhance economic integration by bolstering access to global markets. Additionally, FDI plays a crucial role in supporting economies during and after economic downturns. FDI as a service aims to outline the structure of tasks, responsibilities, and relationships between stakeholders, allowing for clear delineation of connections between its constituent investors and host countries. Providing foreign direct investment as a comprehensive, end-to-end service enhances the potential value realized in growth markets. When executed effectively, this service facilitates seamless processes throughout the investment cycle, establishes methods for minimizing inefficiencies and maximizing effectiveness, sets standards for processes, integrates feedback mechanisms to encourage continual improvement, and optimizes handling of exceptions. Although the potential for FDI spill-overs is widely recognized, it's important not to assume their positive impacts. The realization of FDI benefits in the host economy relies on various factors, including the competitiveness of local producers, the strategic decisions of foreign-owned firms, and the technological disparities between domestic and foreign-owned firms, thereby affecting the absorptive capacity of local producers. FDI-as-a-service This is where FDI-as-a-service comes in. This strategic approach involves top-down planning to optimize the outcomes of the investment portfolio by efficiently developing and delivering projects, with the aim to de-risk projects, scale investments, and optimize the overall outcome. Providing FDI as a service through end-to-end solutions significantly leverages tokenization to transform and democratize foreign direct investment in growth markets. Tokenization enables the fractional ownership of real-world assets, providing increased liquidity and democratizing access to sustainable investments for a wider range of investors. This process enhances asset management by enabling the automation and standardization of key operations through smart contracts.
Crucial steps such as compliance verifications, investor credential checks, and dividend distributions are automated, drastically reducing the burdens of manual documentation and inconsistent records. Blockchain technology facilitates rapid settlement, reducing risks associated with counterparty transactions. Its transparency and traceability ensure that each transaction is logged, simplifying audits and enhancing accountability, which in turn helps prevent fraud and strengthens transactional integrity. The efficiencies gained through tokenization make the markets more accessible, lowering minimum investment sizes, diminishing geographical barriers, and allowing a wider range of participants. This increases both market volume and liquidity. Tokenization also supports nearly instantaneous settlements, further enhancing liquidity and benefiting both investors and traders. By converting tangible and intangible assets into digital tokens, tokenization revolutionizes access to investments. It allows for fractional ownership, enabling the division of high-value assets into smaller, more affordable units. This transformation opens up investment opportunities to a broader, more diverse audience, democratizing access and reducing entry barriers, making it an ideal strategy for attracting FDI into emerging markets. Tokenization on the blockchain Tokenization of real-world assets, as part of FDI-as-a-service, involves converting tangible and intangible assets into digital tokens on a blockchain. These assets can include traditional ones like real estate, agricultural products, mining commodities, financial assets like equities and bonds, or even intellectual properties such as digital art. This process may involve assets that are simultaneously represented in traditional record systems (off-chain), or those exclusively managed on the blockchain (on-chain). The tokenization process generally unfolds in four essential steps, each critical to ensuring the asset's successful digital representation and integration into growth markets through FDI services. Tokenization of real-world assets as part of FDI-as-a-service boasts significant advantages, notably the democratization of access which potentially enhances liquidity through the fractionalization of assets, or the division of ownership into smaller, more manageable shares. This process can simplify previously labor-intensive manual procedures, reducing costs and making investment opportunities accessible to smaller investors within certain asset classes. Nonetheless, regulatory constraints may limit access to these investments, often restricting tokenized assets to accredited investors. Although fractionalization enhances liquidity and is an attractive proposition, the distribution of tokenized assets must achieve a much larger scale to fully realize true democratization of access. Furthermore, in the context of FDI as a service, the blockchain technology underlying the tokenization of real-world assets ensures complete transparency and immutability regarding ownership, transactions, and crucial market data, all verifiable by any participant. We are confident in the future of tokenized assets. One estimate suggests the market could even grow 30-fold by 2030, when it may reach a value of over $28 trillion.
submitted by Tesa_Tesanovic1988 to Tokenization [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 17:27 divad1196 Code too complicate for non-developers

TLDR;

I am doing my job in the easiest way so that any developer, even a fresh junior, could understand it. But I get complains behind my back because people that never code are not able to understand the code I wrote for a CLI within the minute (The CLI itself is fine, they are able to use it, they are happy).
I am trying to vent out a bit and find people here that might relate to my situation.

Context

I joined a team of non-dev as a DevOps in order to make their life easier.
Before I came, they already add their shot at doing things themselves, but the results were not great, it took a lot of time and debug. They also said that all the work that was made by one leaving the company had to be thrown away because the people left were never able to understand what was done.
When I started, the code (python) was awful. For one: the imports were not working and impossible to track because they only worked with a specific "PYTHONPATH" defined in the CI through an external source.
In a couple of months, I made the previous code work correctly, simplified + documented all the code and improved the work of many from the team. I also took over other projects, accomplished a lot of job in a fraction of the time that was estimated for it... from what was said, I understand that they never had someone achieving so much in this amount of time. I got a lot of thanking for all of that, at least to my face..

The issue

A few weeks ago, my manager that was always so happy with my work came to me angry and said that my colleagues (non-devs) had complained that my code is too complicate for them. He told me that even him tried to understand one of my code and wasn't able to. My manager insisted that I made it easy enough for them to be able to take over me if I ever got to be unavailable.This topic came again this week, so this is now the second time.
The point is: the code is as easy as it can be. I have suppervised multiple apprentices over the years, so I know what might be to complicate for a beginner in the field. The worst part is that when I try to explain why I think it would be easy to take over my code, he gets "the code is easy" and concludes that I am dimishing their intelligence.
IMO, they don't know to code. They think they know because python is an easy language to read. They only understand their own code, at least the few weeks after writing it, so they would feel the same with anyone's code (proof is that they had to throw away all the code that was made).
I am willing to show them what they need to know, but on their side, they are not interested at all. They don't want to code but, if one day they need to edit my code, any of them needs to be able to understand it within the minute.

What now

Honestly, the job is nice, I have a lot of ideas for things to improve for them... but I really don't like being treated this way. Being a developer is a job; I don't pretend to be a cook because I know how to boil some pasta. People think they are developers because they can write a few lines of code in python.
I think I will come to my manager, pro-actively and prepared this time, and rest my case one last time. Hopefully, he will understand, otherwise, I might start looking at other job positions.
submitted by divad1196 to developpeurs [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 14:35 OznerpaG Quick Oversimplified Leader Guide

made a Quick Oversimplified Leader Guide on steam if anybody is interested
Steam Community :: Guide :: Quick Oversimplified Leader Guide
i'l post it below as well
Leaders Simplified
This is a bit of an over-simplification as there are many variables with regard to Leaders, but if you are just starting out, or you'r not big on Leader micro, then this is only the bare basics that you need to worry about.
I only look at 4 things: CAP, which is how good they are at learning and INT/WACHA, which if you multiply x2 is the max levels the Leader can earn
So the first thing you do when you get a new Leader is go to the MNG tab, then LEADER tab, and click on their pic to look at them. Note their INT/WACHA and CAP.
For example, I have a Leader named 'Simon White', who has INT 39, WAR 34, CHA 26, and is CAP III.
Convert the INT/WACHA each into a single number - multiply x2 and round to the nearest single digit number. So: INT 39 x2 = 78 = INT 8 WAR 34 x2 = 68 = WAR 7 CHA 26 x2 = 52 = CHA 5
Next, exit, and at the bottom of the screen you will see a 'Rename' button. Click on that, and after the first name (Simon) type in the 3 numbers. It will look like
Simon 875
Click ok, next after the last name type in the CAP. It will look like:
White III
So the person's name is now:
Simon 875 White III
Also check the age of all the Leaders, if they are older than 60 change their last name to OLD to remind you that Leader is approaching retirement age
so if Simon 875 White III is 62 years old, rename him to:
Simon 875 OLD III
Sometimes you might get an amazing CAP V Leader, like Aaron Sterling who has 61/34/56. In that case, insert a period between numbers to separate them:
Aaron 12.7.11 Sterling V
So now when you need to assign a Leader to a position, you will immediately see how useful they are at their job without having to do research.
In addition if you get an event which is going to upset a Leader, you can immediately know whether it matters to you or not
My personal rule of thumb is 6 or higher is acceptable on important skills, any lower and I look to replace them when the opportunity arises.
So what does each position need? Here is the cheat sheet: X = Important, n = not used
Secretary - USELESS BACKUP ROLLER, no skills needed/used after Leaders filled
Advisor - depends on whom you want to attach them to
Zone Governor - XnX (budget 15 = +1 happy, 75 = +3 happy)
SHQ - nXn (SHQ can also do Trade Negotiation which means XXn, however WAR is by far most important)
Supreme Command - XXX
Economic Council - Xnn
Military Research - Xnn
Airforce Research - Xnn
Model Design - Xnn
Foreign Affairs - nnX
Staff Council - nXX
Secret Service - nXX
Interior Council - XnX
Applied Science - Xnn
Commanders - nXX
That's it!
submitted by OznerpaG to ShadowEmpireGame [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 13:08 Dayarkon Was XCOM a western attempt to replicate the success of Japanese tactics games like Fire Emblem?

Has Jake Solomon ever talked about Fire Emblem being an influence on the XCOM games? Because the design philosophy of the XCOM games seems to be closer to Fire Emblem than it is to the original X-COM.
Fire Emblem is an influential series that predates XCOM by 22 years. While Julian Gollop's Laser Squad, the precursor to X-COM, actually predates Fire Emblem by several years, that's not relevant since he wasn't involved with the development of Firaxis' XCOM games.
While X-COM used time units that let you perform a variety of different actions, XCOM has a move+attack system, just like Fire Emblem.
While in X-COM enemies patrolled freely and could attack you at any time, XCOM uses a pod system that encourages to creep ahead slowly and deliberately to isolate individual pods. While Fire Emblem doesn't have a strict pod system, in practice it works the same way, with you creeping ahead slowly to isolate small groups of enemies.
While X-COM had a ballistics simulation on top of its dice rolls, attacks in XCOM are pure dice rolls, just like Fire Emblem.
While X-COM had a freeform classless system, XCOM has a class system where classes can only use specific weapons, just like Fire Emblem.
While environments in X-COM were almost entirely destructible, XCOM retains only a fraction of this destructability, making its environments largely static, just like Fire Emblem.
XCOM replaces the simulationist aspects of X-COM with more abstract mechanics. Just to name one example, in X-COM you could loot the body of a fallen enemy or ally and immediately use whatever item or weapon you looted off them. You can't do that in XCOM, nor can you in Fire Emblem.
XCOM uses cinematic close-ups during combat, which are similiar to the special battle screens of Fire Emblem.
XCOM vastly simplifies the strategy and management side of X-COM, making it closer to a tactics game like Fire Emblem, rather than a full-on strategy game like the original X-COM.
While X-COM...okay, I'll stop here. You get the point. This can't all be a coincidence right? It seems to me that Jake Solomon and Firaxis deliberately mimicked the style of games like Fire Emblem. It obviously paid off, with how successful the XCOM games have been.
submitted by Dayarkon to Xcom [link] [comments]


2024.05.18 01:39 Tappty_Cards NFC Google Review cards - 1 Year Experimentation. Brutally honest, deep insights and the pros and cons. What type of business can benefit from the Google review card, or NOT.

NFC Google Review cards - 1 Year Experimentation. Brutally honest, deep insights and the pros and cons. What type of business can benefit from the Google review card, or NOT.
Hello everyone, I am the founder of Tappty ( https://tappty.com ), the One Tap Google Review NFC card service provider. I've been doing nation-wide experimentations for little over a year, focusing on "Google reviews" and consumer behavioral studies. And I wanted to share honest, interesting insights about Google review cards and how it impacts local businesses, including pros and cons.
https://preview.redd.it/g50im51v421d1.png?width=432&format=png&auto=webp&s=7b1a200ba0d3fa46d6dd93a3aaf09f27913402bd
If you are a local business owner (i.e. restaurants, cafe, dessert shop, spa/massage, mattress stores, contractors, etc.), you will find valuable insights about automated customer acquisition strategy within this post, so I highly recommend reading this through!
A brief sneak-peak into some of the insights I will be covering. Detailed explanations provided in the body paragraph.
As this can be quite a long, in-depth content, I'll start this off by outlining the agenda below:
  1. Why is this effective, and what types of business does it benefit?
  2. How many Google reviews is good enough, and what's the good average Star-rating?
  3. The Pros
  4. The Cons
  5. The Verdict

1. Brief Intro to the Concept of NFC & Google Review Card (What the hell is it?)

First of all, let me explain briefly what "Google Review NFC Card" is for those people who hasn't heard of it yet.
One short video is much better than 1,000 words explanation, so here is the 20 sec demo:
A short demo of how \"Google Review NFC Cards\" work
Basically, Google Review card is utilizing a technological concept called "NFC". It works in the same way as how Apple Pay or Google Pay works, and the physical card stores programmed information that gets "activated" when you tap a smartphone (iPhone or Android) onto the card.
In the case of the Google Review card, the card stores the URL information of the "Instant Google Review Writing Page" of a business, that is uniquely given to every business owners with Google business profile.
Example - Instant Google Review Writing Page for Panda Express - [ URL here ]
So when you tap a smartphone onto the Google Review card, your smartphone reads the URL information programmed into the card, and automatically opens up the web browser to visit the page (in which case, it would be the Google review writing page).

2. Why is this effective, and what types of business does it benefit?

In terms of "WHY Google Review Card is effective", I'll break this down in the most concise form possible:
  1. Google review has massive impact on local businesses' customer acquisition & marketing.
  • How often have you checked reviews/star-rating on Google Map to make visitation decisions for a restaurant/cafe or other local businesses?
  • You are not the only one using Google Map to make the visitation/purchase decision. 95% of Americans are thinking in the same way as you are, when they are thinking as a consumer.
  1. It's hard to collect Google reviews from people, because it's too cumbersome.
    • It's estimated that less than 1~2% of customers are voluntarily leaving reviews.
    • If you haven't thought about this, it takes anywhere from 30 sec ~ 1 minute and a minimum of 7 action-steps for a customer to locate your business page on Google and start writing a review.
    • Customers are generally NOT motivated to jump through these inconvenience hoops, unless they are genuinely touched by your great service, or are pissed off (which makes it worse..)
  2. Google Review NFC Card is highly effective for increasing review collection rate, because it drastically shortens & simplifies the customer journey to leave a review.
    • With the Google review card, the process gets drastically simplified into 3 steps & 3 Seconds:
      • (1) Tap the card on a phone
      • (2) Auto-Opens the review writing page of your business
      • (3) Leave a review
    • Depending on the business types and/or tactics, I have been seeing a significant increase in "Review rate per customer", from as low as 20% to a whopping 2,500% increase.
In case you are wondering "How and why is Google review so important for a local business success?" I am attaching a URL link for a separate post that talks in great depth about the topic.
Okay, now we have a fundamental understanding of "Why Google review card is effective."

So (WHO) what types of businesses can get the best benefit out of Google review cards?

It's the LOCAL BUSINESSES that target local customers, which get heavily influenced by Google reviews.
Below is the comprehensive list of the business types:
  1. Food & Beverage - Restaurants, Cafe, Dessert Shops, etc.
  2. Beauty & Hygiene - Spa/Massage, Barber shops/hair salon, nail/pedicure, Make Up shops, etc.
  3. Medical & Clinics - Dental, Emergency Care, Chiropractic, Skin care, etc.
  4. Automotive - Car dealership, mechanics shop, etc.
  5. Sales - Mattress stores, Insurance agencies, marketing/printing agencies, etc.
  6. Home/Maintenance/Contractors/Professional Services - Lawn Mowing, Pool cleaning, Plumbers, Electrician, Construction, InterioExterior Design, etc.
  7. Specialty Retail - Any retail shops that focuses on selling specialty goods (so no groceries), like outdoor, sports, hunting, business equipment, etc.

3. How many Google reviews is "good enough," and what's the "good" average Star-rating?

As simple as these questions sound, there’s actually a whole complex cognitive science behind this.
I've conducted a nationwide study with over 1,500 randomized survey participants, to accurately answer the two questions. And below is the heatmap to visually represent the finding to the study:
https://preview.redd.it/zafiz5mww11d1.png?width=1271&format=png&auto=webp&s=98754e21986effdde51593b08947399b5032e3ac
As this alone is a very long and big topic to cover by itself, I am going to attach a link to a separate post that focuses about this. Please refer to this post (How many Google reviews is good enough? And what's the minimum average star-rating?), if you are interested in this specific topic.
But in a nutshell (TLDR):
  1. You want to stay away from the A/B/C Zone
  2. You want to get yourself in the D & E Zone:
    1. 390+ of Google review count (AND)
    2. 4.8 Stars if you have 390 reviews
      1. May decrease to 4.2 stars with 1,000+ reviews (OR)
      2. May decrease to 4.1 stars with 2,000+ reviews
      3. BUT NEVER BELOW 4.0 stars, no matter how many reviews you have.
  3. By the time your business reaches the D-Zone, Google's ecosystem will be positively impacting your growth and will be helping with your new customer acquisition greatly.
  4. And E-Zone is where true customer acquisition growth automation occurs, and you are pretty much set for life. Google will be consistently feeding you with more customers than you can chew, forming a long waiting line or a waitlist.
It's basically every local business owner's dream to reach the E-Zone, and those that do, generally tend to live a very happy, wealthy and well-balance life, and possibly expanding their businesses into other locations as well.

4. The Pros of Google review NFC cards

  1. Google Review Count Increase
  • It really does work, and you WILL experience a solid, noticeable increase in Google review count from the DAY 1 of using it.
  1. Reputation Improvement
    • The amount of 5-Stars you get significantly increases. Tons of customers are satisfied with your product/service, but are just too damn lazy to leave a review. One tap Google review card definitely solves this problem, and motivates these 'Low-key satisfied' customers to leave a review for you.
  2. Google Rank & Visibility (SEO) Improvement
    • As you collect more reviews and star ratings, Google's algorithm starts to place your business page above your competitor's. This has a major advertising impact on your business, without having to spend a single dime on ads.
  3. Sales Increase & Growth Automation
    • Combining the 3 effect mentioned above, it naturally leads to an automated growth of your business and sales. After certain threshold, you should be able to enjoy a positive, iterative cycle of auto-growth. Your reviews bring in more customers, and the customers leave more reviews, and the cycle goes on.

5. The Cons of Google review NFC cards

  1. "Passive Placement" of the cards isn't the best way. Find a clever way to deliver this card to your customers.
    • Typically, businesses utilize the Google review card in three ways:
      • (#1) Place it somewhere visible for the customers (reception desk, counter, etc.)
      • (#2) Directly hand it to the customers, asking for a review
      • (#3) Place it in the check (bill), when customer is done eating
    • #1 - although it produces better result than not having the Google review card, you're not really getting the full benefit out of it. Many customers tend to ignore it or simply don't notice them, and you are losing out on valuable opportunities to collect more reviews. It's the laziest form of utilizing the Google review card.
      • If you MUST utilize this method, make sure to get multiple Google review cards and place them around your shop EVERYWHERE (i.e. tables, chair, front door, bathroom door, you name it). This seems to increase the review rate significantly.
    • #2 - This yields the highest review result, and I definitely recommend this method the most. But this can be a little problematic depending on your circumstance, and it's definitely not the most feasible method when you are hectic during your peak hours.
    • #3 - This is a good balance between #1 & #2. While it's a passive way to gather review, it produces a great review yield. Customers generally have to wait for the server to pick up their check. While waiting, many of them get curious and try tapping their phone on the card out of curiosity, which converts into solid number of Google reviews per day.
  2. Review counts increase FAST, but your Sales will take time to improve.
    • As mentioned above, you will notice a significant increase in the number of Google reviews you get per day, from the DAY 1 of implementing the Google review cards.
    • You may be very happy and start expecting major improvements in your sales immediately, but transferring the impact into your actual sales takes some time to notice, anywhere between 1 to 6 months (I typically saw noticeable impact within the 2 ~ 4 months).
    • So if you are buying the Google review NFC cards, understand that it takes couple of months to start affecting your sales to a degree where you'll be able to notice 'Oh, we are definitely getting more customers nowadays!' Wait patiently, and you'll get there.
    • If you are in need of something that produces immediate results in the short-term, paid advertisements is the best way to go, although the cost-effectiveness is something I can argue.
  3. It's also easy to collect 1 star reviews.
    • As easy it is to collect 5 star Google reviews, it also makes it very easy to attract 1 star reviews as well.
    • This is a problem where many other Google review NFC cards suffer from, and some business owners are very concerned about this impact.
    • To tackle this problem, I have created a "5-Star Only" filter feature within our Google review cards (Tappty), where only 5 star reviews can be collected and low star reviews are blocked. Learn More about this feature here.
    • So if you plan on using Google review cards without 5-Star filter feature, understand this risk as well. I highly recommend you to check out our 5-star filter feature to mitigate the reputation risks.
  4. If your product/service sucks, Google review cards will not solve your problem.
    • While the Google review cards certainly helps, you need to work on solving the fundamental problem of your business.
    • Google review cards only help to generate more reviews and get online traction & visibility, but it has ZERO impact on your returning customers.
    • There are limited number of new customers in your local area, and there will be a time where you'll run out of new customers to bring in. If you cannot retain your customers to return, you will most definitely run out of business sooner or later.

6. The Verdict

If you meet the following criteria, I highly recommend you to get the Google review NFC cards:
  1. You are running a local business, and your primary target market is geographically limited to your local town/city.
  2. Google review has a significant impact on your customer acquisition and reputation.
  3. Your competitor(s) with higher Google review count and/or higher star ratings is doing well. You want to beat them, fast.
  4. You are doing well, but a new, nearby competitor(s) is growing very fast, and you want to maintain your dominance in your area.
  5. You are confident about your product/service quality, and you are feeling like you really need to work on marketing.
  6. You want to build a long-term customer acquisition funnel, and understand that sales performance will take time to improve.
  7. You understand the significance of Google reviews in your business success, and you want to improve your review status.
However, if you are in the following situation, I don't think Google review cards will provide too much of a value, and would not recommend you to try it:
  1. Your business landscape is mostly over the internet (e-commerce, software, etc.), and your target market is not geographically limited to your local region. In this case, Google review has minimal impact on your business and Google visibility.
  2. You are looking for an immediate, short-term revenue increase. Paid advertisement will work better for this.
  3. Your service/product quality consistently suffers, and the majority of your customers have been complaining about this. Better to fix your core issues before getting excited about collecting more reviews.
  4. You don't see much value of Google review and its impact towards your business. Some businesses occupy such a unique niche without any competitors, and this
And if you are interested in getting a Google review NFC card for your business, please feel free to check my product out at https://tappty.com (Tappty)!
We provide very affordable solutions (starting at $3.99), and is only a fraction of a cost compared to other Google review NFC cards in the market (most of them sells for $40 ~ 70 per card, and that's a ridiculous pricing).
And the best part - we are the only Google review NFC cards that offers the "5-Star Only" filter features, and it's literally a game changer in the industry!
submitted by Tappty_Cards to Tappty [link] [comments]


2024.05.17 23:07 Sandro-Halpo The Effect of Rerolls on D6 Probabilities: A Visual Guide and Discussion

The Effect of Rerolls on D6 Probabilities: A Visual Guide and Discussion
Recently I was working on a sci-fi tabletop miniatures game, and while designing one of the factions decided to give some of their units a phasing ability. The lore and visual aesthetic of this was straightforward, but how to represent it in-game?
I greatly dislike +1 or -1 style modifiers, especially if there are a lot of them and they stack on top of each other. I could go on for an hour or so about why I think they are an overused lazy design that, among other things...
I digress. Maybe it's okay for things like cover but no modifiers like that for unit abilities! However I was open to the idea of rerolls. In order to make my game both fun and balanced, I needed to understand the statistical and probability effects these abilities and reroll rules would have on the D6 dice used in the game. Fortunately the mathematical calculations are not unduly complex or difficult, but I quickly found that staring at a handful of fractions and percentages on a text document didn't really help me "understand" what it would really do to an actual game with human players, not binary chalkboard spreadsheets.
So I made some graphs to visualize it. To help give context and comparison guidance. Since there wasn't anything of the sort readily available online already, I thought I'd share these graphs and a few of my insights regarding them. I like to think they are easily digested and clearly labeled, but I'll go through them to discuss. This whole rabbit-hole was started because of a miniatures wargame, but actualy the end results are probably just as or even more useful for regular board games. This subreddit isn't only about RPG's right? Games that use dice other than D6's aren't going to find these results very helpful though, so keep that in mind.
I will avoid going past five dice for the charts in this post since most target numbers and reroll effects quickly end up at or near 90% past five dice, with only things like a target number of 6 with a negative modifier not being 99.9% chance around ten dice or so. Relatedly, I didn't bother with 2+ and 3+ targets in these graphs because even with negative modifiers you are consistently likely to succeed even with only a single die and practically guaranteed to do so with a beneficial reroll or multiple dice.
First up are some simple charts of how likely you are to get at least one success with various reroll effects. The exact same information is shown in two different types of graphs. I think this is absolutely not redundant, because they give different impressions.
https://preview.redd.it/xwg4rir2x11d1.png?width=3840&format=png&auto=webp&s=196e91c2ab3611e1eca3a83410aa58172bb88d58
https://preview.redd.it/2kb0hir2x11d1.png?width=3840&format=png&auto=webp&s=49d5a801c608c5ac9c76e4810ea9322223cb700c
https://preview.redd.it/0euq4jr2x11d1.png?width=3840&format=png&auto=webp&s=fdd4f6f342b630cd7f466d67f2ae59cec9e472df
https://preview.redd.it/ykzsv6q4x11d1.png?width=3840&format=png&auto=webp&s=f6af71a32fd22d936a6f75c622afe71525f8f210
https://preview.redd.it/wdefz7q4x11d1.png?width=3840&format=png&auto=webp&s=550951243c107004907349598854bd28dd419da5
https://preview.redd.it/4tijmaq4x11d1.png?width=3840&format=png&auto=webp&s=e8bb24afa9f6a4f64e483347b17e957bc21234bc
Probably the first thing you'll notice is that the effect of the rerolls on probability changes drastically depending on what the target number is. In both directions actually, with the increasing or decreasing difference from a "plain roll" getting more and more exaggerated with additional dice.
Maybe this is just un-asked for advice, but as a game designer I would highly recommend people try to avoid probabilities higher than 90% or lower than 10% if reasonable to do so. The purpose of this is simple: those likelihoods are not going to fail or succeed often enough to be fun or relevant. Unless your game involves rolling copious amounts of dice, then literally an entire game will go by start to finish without either player actually rolling two 1's in a row in a situation that needs it. It's only a 2.78% chance! That isn't zero or anything and if you roll a few hundred dice combined during the game sure it'll happen here and there.
But that's the thing, it won't happen WHEN it's relevant. Coincidentally getting two 6's, like for example when you toss two dice, get a 2 and then a 6, reroll the 2 and get another 6. That was a statistically remarkable two 6's in a row! But you don't care, because for either die you actually only needed a 4. It's mildly notable from a mathematical standpoint but neither player will get excited about it or, Hell, even notice because they are focused on the end result and don't care if it was a 5 or a 6. And the few times that you absolutely need to make that final shot to take down the badly wounded monster, if you have a 93.4% chance or whatever then flubbing that roll won't feel like a tactical or strategic error or a risky gamble that didn't work out this time. It will just feel like an irritating and arbitrary fluke.
With that said, let's look at the relative effect of a reroll, rather than the overall effect on probability.
https://preview.redd.it/un7yh7e6x11d1.png?width=3840&format=png&auto=webp&s=204bd0c2deba4bd6b82676da88cce46f35a12da7
When I first started doing the math I was surprised by how little a difference rerolling 1's made. It's only 8.33% with Target 4+ and an even more meager 2.78% at 6+. That's just mild noise. That's not enough of a change to have any tangible or noticeable impact on a player's strategy or tactics or psychological warfare. Yeah, sure, if you are like Walmart looking at some quarterly revenue report than 8.33% or even 2.78% is such a difference that you can break out the champagne. But dice only land as a 4 or a 5, not as 4.515768 compared to 4.681293. And again, unless you are rolling entire cups full of dice and then spending all that time counting them and sorting them before you then spend another minute or two rerolling a bunch, it's not going to truly matter.
It's funny because forcing a person to reroll 6's, on the other hand, goes from a minor debuff at 4+ to a crippling shutdown at 6+! Even rolling 10 dice at a time doesn't give good chances.
So... is it better to do the "Reroll Hits" and "Reroll Misses" route instead? Yeah, personally I'd say so. Not only do they have much more noticeable effects on the game, but they are more mirrored regarding how much they alter the probability up or down compared to a single roll. Remember how I said neither player will care if a dice ends up as 5 or 6 if all they needed was a 4? That's the same mindset with rerolling Hits or Misses compared to a specific number. It makes it more of a Pass/Fail attitude than an arbitrary numerical emphasis.
I feel that, in regards to both fun and balance, the initially drastic effects of Hit/Miss rerolls on Target 6+ can be negated by overall good design that contextualizes it. Let me give a real, practical example:
You want to shoot someone. You start with a base 5+ target to hit them. But they are behind some cover, so that makes the target number 6+. Okay, you are fine with those odds, you still got a 16-ish percent chance per shot right? Ah, no actually... the target has a partial cloaking device that forces you to reroll hits when targeting them from a distance. Damn, now you only have a 2.78% chance of hitting them! That's basically impossible! This isn't fair! That cloaking device is overpowered!
Hold up now, it's not. You have other options. If you use a flamethrower or weaponized EMP or some other area of effect weapon, it will ignore the forced rerolls of the cloaking device. Or, if you haven't received any damage this round and choose not to move this turn, you can "Aim", with allows any unit to lower the target number by 1 when shooting. So it's back down to 5+, and you've got 11.11% chance. Or you could use a psychic power or hacking ability or something else that targets the mind, not the body, which would not only ignore the cover but also ignore the Reroll Hits effect for a pleasant 33.33%. So your assault troopers might have a hard time with that cloaked fellow but your combat tech-priest is much better suited to taking him out. OR you could say that, well, I'll just shoot him with a heavy machine gun that fires lots and lots of bullets. That weapon has a built in Reroll Misses ability, so the two abilities cancel each other out and it's a plain 6+ target again. 16.67% or 11.11% or whatever aren't good odds but it's not as impossible as 2.78%!
Do you see how this works? It's not unfair or unrealistic or "gamey" that it's very, very difficult to shoot a person wearing a cloaking device who's also hiding behind cover from a distance. And even if you DO have a very hard time shooting them so what? The other player isn't going to win the game and achieve the Objective by hiding their units in the bushes near the edge of the map/board. If other aspects of the game overall or the specific scenario encourage movement or combined arms or "anti-camping" measures then that unit who is extremely difficult to shoot in that specific turn might end up a lot easier to hit later, or they WERE easier to hit a few turns ago and frankly it's your own fault for letting them get into such a great tactical position unopposed.
This absolutely goes in the other direction too. A unit ability that gives you Rerolls Misses which might at first seem like an unfair and unfun "he always hits me why does he even need to roll for fucks sake..." could be balanced and managed if you did better about taking cover, arranging rock-paper-scissors match-ups in your favor, focused on the scenario objective instead of bloodthirsty combat, made your army list more well-rounded defensively, etc etc.
Let's look at the impact of rerolls from a different angle. Previous charts were focused on the likelihood that you'd score at least one success. But obviously that is not the only thing that matters. If you are hacking away at a monster with 5 HP, or need a cumulative amount of successes to complete an arcane ritual regardless of how few or many turns that takes you, then you care about the average number of successes more than you care about the likelihood of getting a success. Let's see the charts!
https://preview.redd.it/44dlc5q8x11d1.png?width=3840&format=png&auto=webp&s=d59d058c52d9a6ad340ca33b89c5b2226fdc0ba0
https://preview.redd.it/6zrjw0q8x11d1.png?width=3840&format=png&auto=webp&s=c512befe003a9fb85af8e7aa9bc1388375289c16
https://preview.redd.it/jj7fh0q8x11d1.png?width=3840&format=png&auto=webp&s=7b5c714a36e4b2048ab34c34014f4608afa7e4dd
Now naturally you can't get 0.5 or 1.82 successes in real life, since you can only get whole numbers with D6 dice. But these give some telling insights none-the-less. The biggest difference between these charts and the earlier ones is that average number of successes is linear, not binomial like the % chances. Rolling three times against a 5+ target does NOT make you three times as likely to succeed. Sadly for our puny human brains probability doesn't wok that way. But the cumulative results would actually be three times as high on plain addition. Again we see that the Reroll 1's effect has very little impact, especially at a single die but even all the way up to five. The Reroll Hits and Misses ones have more of a noticeable impact.
But I think this shows that, if your game or your special ability or whatever does involve tossing substantial amounts of dice, the effects of a beneficial rerolls ability start giving you a hefty amount of successes. With ten dice against 4+, with rerolling misses, you could casually assume you'll get five or six hits. Certainly you'll get at least two or three, right? Conversely, even if you start avalanching all the D6 dice you have nearby at the same time you'll never have good odds of getting more than one success against 6+ with either negative reroll type. But you stand a reliably good chance of getting at least one if you can reroll misses!
But what's that you say? You don't care about "successes" you care about the total number of pips from a roll? Well, I mean, that's not a very common thing in most games, but yeah sure it's valid. Dungeons and Dragons famously uses a few D6s added up for the starting ability scores of characters, though that game also uses D20's not just D6's so... Yahtzee? That game is a whole 'nother can of worms regarding probability...
Maybe people don't use it very often because it's not common knowledge how rerolls influence that! Good thing I'm here! Though actually it's just because it takes a lot more time and effort to do all that addition over and over again, especially if you have lots of dice. And then there is usually a bunch of record-keeping associated with it... Still, it's just more basic yet tedious math that I figured out before writing this so that you don't have to!
Now, when looking for as high a total as possible rather than a specific number or better, you don't have any "Hits" or "Misses" but you can calculate the odds if you could voluntarily reroll "low" numbers or be forced to reroll "high" numbers. Which you would, logically, define as 1/2/3 and 4/5/6 because if you rolled a 4 initially you are more likely to roll something worse or the same than you are to reroll that into a 5 or 6.
So.....
https://preview.redd.it/r7s2lovbx11d1.png?width=3840&format=png&auto=webp&s=c9cd7dc26bdeb9563c11ac09afaeb543ab49509a
As you can probably see, the effect is very minor unless you are rolling lots of dice and adding the pips up. Which quickly becomes cumbersome and boring after five dice and unless there is a substantial difference between a result of 17 and 19 in your game, it probably won't make a meaningful impact regardless of what beneficial or hindering rerolls you have. Having visual evidence of that is helpful though, and again perhaps your game actually does have tangible consequences between a total result of, say, lower than 10 or higher than 10. If so, and if in your game you routinely roll three dice, against that threshold rerolling highs and lows would actually come into play in a meaningful way frequently. But it might be worth considering just adding or subtracting a die instead, to cut down on time and brain power spent on rerolls.
I can hear the people in the back... "Yeah, that's swell dude, but in MY game we don't use target numbers OR cumulative totals. We use opposed rolls, where both players roll one or more dice at the same time."
Alright listen here you lil' shits...
I mean, uh, that is, mathematically speaking that would look similar to but not identical to the graphs and discussion we already went through, just with the "target" numbers decided at the last moment by whichever die happened to stop moving first. I understand it would be a bit more complicated than that regarding % probability, since unlike the stuff we've gone over so far the temporary "target" results one players needs to beat the other player might be affected by different reroll rules, which would alter the overall impact of "your" reroll effect on the probability you'd win in the end.
That is, while the above graphs could give you accurate info on your chance of victory or defeat after one of the opposing dice stops moving, that isn't the same as knowing your overall likelihood of winning before taking the tactical or strategic action that triggers the opposed roll.
I could do the math, but it would be difficult to display that information without cumbersomely large or dense graphs, or a large number of simpler but very specific use-case graphs. There are too many variables. What if different players roll different numbers of dice? Is there only one "round" of rerolls after the initial toss or is it more like each player is allowed a reroll independently? Like, we both have a Reroll Misses ability. I roll a 4 and he rolls a 3. So he gets to use his reroll, and then gets a 6. Do... I get to reroll now too? No, it's only a second chance if I initially lose the toss? What if we both roll the same number in the first toss? That is a whole lot of very specific calculations (some of which are tricky to reduce into a simple "X% chance I win" numerical value) to display in a single post.
In many ways the numbers would be very similar to what is above anyways. So if you intend to have opposed rolls in your game, just look at the graphs here and imagine a few minor changes up or down. And maybe reconsider the wisdom of opposed rolls with rerolls, because that is going to be a nightmare to even playtest, let alone reliably balance.
So... anyhows,
What have we learned? Well, nothing really since I did all the math for you and didn't explain how I did it or how I implement these rerolls into my game/s. But personally I feel a lot more informed and confident in my decision to emphasize rerolls over generic +1 or -1 modifiers. I also feel comfortable recommending that the Reroll Hits and Reroll Misses way is better than the Reroll 1's and 6's idea. Mostly because it is more symetrical in the positive or negative impact and also less of a trivial difference, but also because I feel that the Pass/Fail mentality is superior to the number specific mindset.
Dolling out these reroll abilities too liberally or arbitrarily would bog down the game and be very difficult to balance. If four-out-of-five units in your army and three-out-of-five in your opponent's army are rerolling on a regular basis, we are going to be spending literally twice as much real life time or worse on a very basic aspect of gameplay. And it can feel very arbitrary or immersion breaking to see such an effect on the dice that doesn't have a plausible or rational justification in the lore or aesthetics.
My Lunar Elite veterans of the Marson IV campaign get Reroll Misses on their Fear rolls or Initiative rolls or whatever. Okay sure, that makes sense, they are experienced combatants so might be a little quicker on the rollout or need less time to react to things than a fresh recruit because unlike the new guy they've already seen horrible cosmic abominations before and defeated them. But that guy has a jetpack... so... why does he make your opponent Reroll Hits in melee combat again?
Thus, in summary, jetpacks are awesome, +1 modifiers are to be avoided when possible, and I think I got all the math correctly computed and accurately placed on my graphs. If you actually care about the formulas or want to double check my findings, I am totally happy to write them out in a comment down below! And yeah, I'd love to hear your thoughts on rerolls, or know if anybody but myself actually benefits from these data visualizations. Keep making and playing games!
___________________________________________________
Bonus Round!
Here are three example formulas. For these examples I'll use the Reroll 1's effect. The process is mostly the same for different target numbers and reroll effects however. You figure out the formula for a single die, then use binomial calculations or arithmetic to work out subsequent additional dice.
If, say, the target number is 5+, and you reroll 1s, the formula would look like this, at least before any condensing or simplification:
((2/6)+((1/6)*(2/6))
Not so hard. It results in 0.38̅ or ~39% chance of at least one success. Now, since each die of a set acts individually, that is, you may roll them at the same time but the results of any specific die do not interact with or change the results of other dice, a straightforward Binomial Cumulative Distribution Function gives you a percent chance for N number of dice.
So if, say, we wanted to see what our chances are with the Reroll Ones ability and a target number of 5+ when we roll four dice... it would look like....
Y=F(1∣4,0.38̅)=1∑i=0(4i)0.38̅i(1−0.38̅)(4−i)I(0,1,...,4)(i) *which may or may not display correctly on your screen*
So... ~86.05%
Math!
Now, for the average total, on a normal D6 die you have equal chances of getting any result so the average total is ((1+2+3+4+5+6)/6) or exactly "3.5". But if you are forced to reroll 6's or allowed to reroll 1's, then you actually have a slightly more than 1/6 chance of getting the other numbers and only a 1/32 chance of getting the 6 or 1 a second time in a row. So the average total is different. Same idea, with a few more parentheses, for rerolling Highs and Lows.
If we sought the average cumulative total for rolling 3 dice if we are Rerolling 1's, the formula would look like this:
(1*((1/6)/6))+(2*((1/6)+((1/6)/6)))+(3*((1/6)+((1/6)/6)))+(4*((1/6)+((1/6)/6)))+(5*((1/6)+((1/6)/6)))+(6*((1/6)+((1/6)/6)))
Simplified and turned into a decimal number, it is 3.916̅. No binomial crap here, more dice just stack up more pips, so that number times three, or...
11.75 as the average total in that situation.
Ta'da!
submitted by Sandro-Halpo to tabletopgamedesign [link] [comments]


2024.05.17 21:12 AdmiralMizufugu Promotional merch isn't reliable for powerscaling

Promotional merch isn't reliable for powerscaling
“The author said” “No, he didn’t” “Yes, he did” “NO, HE DIDN’T” “YES, HE DID
We’ve all read the age-old debate more times than we would honestly like to. That one debate so pervasive, so long-standing that it transcends the borders across series and generations. As long as fictional media exists, it will do so as well
A topic so extensive that no singular dialogue is likely to ever cover every single argument available in either side’s arsenal, dooming the discourse to be started from scratch all over again without a verdict in sight
Are third-party sources reliable for drawing conclusions about the source material?
In a broader sense, nobody on earth has the catch-all answer to that question, as its true answer is variable on a case by case basis. In the particular case of the One Piece manga series, we will attempt to answer that question here and now
If you find reading from Google Docs more comfortable, you can do it here, which would be my recommendation due to formatting and the possibility of future updating, since this format of Reddit posts can’t be edited
In this post we will aim to holistically examine the role of promotional merchandise in One Piece powerscaling, seeking to grasp the big picture of the subject as well as delving into the more technical and detailed points, while also dabbling in various adjacent topics relevant to the main conversation
It would be my preference to give individual credit to every soul who has contributed their stance in this discussion, whichever it may be, but really it was an innumerable number of posts and comments over the years that collectively helped me put together this behemoth of a write-up. So, to everyone who paved the way— thank you
Although there is some continuity and callbacks between sections, this is a long read so I don’t expect anyone to just sit through the whole thing in order. Feel free to see this post as more of an encyclopedia rather than an unbroken prose. Hopefully this or that individual section can be of relevance to you at some point or another
For easier browsing, here’s an index:

1- Reviewing promotional material claims

2- Defining reliability and promotional merchandise

A) Reliability
B) Promotional merchandise

3- Addressing the arguments for merch being reliable

A) Oda has mentioned merch in the SBS
B) Oda supervises Vivre Cards
C) There is an official website that corrects Vivre Cards

4- Is One Piece promotional merch reliable for powerscaling the manga?

A) Is it reliable?
B) Is promotional merch necessarily wrong?
C) Should merch be trusted “with a grain of salt” or “until proven otherwise”?
D) What sources of information are reliable for powerscaling the manga?

5- Greg, the One Piece live-action series official advisor

A) Who is Greg?
B) What can we learn from him?
C) What makes these insights trustworthy?

6- Conclusion

Without further ado, let’s begin!
 
 

1- Reviewing promotional material claims

 
As an appetizer, let’s first go over this post’s slides and take a look at a few claims that would be confirmedly true if promotional merchandise was reliable for powerscaling the One Piece manga
1- Jozu top 1 offense and defense confirmed. Also blocked the confirmed strongest slash in the verse
2- The confirmed strongest slash in the verse couldn’t scratch him, however, somehow Daifuku is totally capable of cutting Jozu’s diamond skin that “repels anything and everything”
3- The “Most Beautiful Woman in the World” with strength that is equal to her beauty
4- Apparently Mihawk > Whitebeard and Whitebeard > Mihawk are simultaneously true, with both men being confirmed to be the strongest man at the same time
5- Tamago kicks > Kizaru kicks confirmed
6- Ben Beckman confirmed to have intimidated Kizaru in four different sources with release dates ranging from 2012 to 2022
7- Don Chinjao, the 500.000 million berry one-shot fodder, is confirmed to have rivaled Gol D. Roger
8- Marco, who has been effectively damaged after running out of stamina is confirmed to be capable of regenerating no matter how many times he’s attacked
9- Sentomaru is confirmed to be an “impregnable” guard
10- Apparently who is stronger between Wano Zoro and Cavendish is a legit question worth asking, and a rivalry between them is something that Oda wants us to seriously consider
11- Whitebeard, who has pronounced his disinterest on more than one occasion, is confirmed to have contended for the title of Pirate King
12- Old Big Mom from Wano confirmed to be stronger than prime Shanks
13- The Egghead Incident and the fate of Luffy and his crew confirmed by the editors to be addressed in Chapter 1099, which ended up being an entirely Kuma-centric flashback chapter
14- Vista is confirmed to be capable of overwhelming and cutting down any opponent no matter who they may be
15- Speed Jiru, a background WB commander with no relevance, no feats and no hype in the manga is confirmed to be faster than YC1 Marco and Yonko Oldbeard
16- Katakuri confirmed to be literally flawless both offensively and defensively and yet lost a fight to someone who is multiple tiers below the strongest characters in the verse
17- Katakuri > Big Mom confirmed
18- Doflamingo confirmed to be the toughest enemy Luffy’s ever met, after having met Magellan, Blackbeard and the Admirals
19- We’ll come back to the last couple slides later on
And we are up to a rocky start. These takes certainly don’t inspire much confidence, if any. This section alone already speaks volumes about how credible third-party products really are, simply by observing the claims made by promotional merch directly from the source and without the need for additional reasoning
Take into consideration— this is only a fraction of the amount of absurd or contradicting statements that can be found in promotional merch. If you take some time to go through the translations of any source of merch, you’ll come to find that these types of claims are par for the course
 
 

2- Defining reliability and promotional merchandise

 

A) Reliability

 
Before diving deeply into the credibility of databooks and other promotional merch, let’s first establish what does it mean for something to be reliable, and what material can actually be qualified as such
We will use the word “reliable” instead of the word “canon” because the latter is a fan concept that has never been used by the author and thus can lend itself to unnecessary misunderstandings and disagreements, muddling the discussion. The word reliable is, redundant as it sounds, a much more reliable and fitting term for our objectives, and will enable us to all be on the same page moving forward
A.1) What is reliability?
Reliable: “Someone or something that is reliable can be trusted or believed because he, she, or it works or behaves well in the way you expect”
Source: Cambridge Dictionary
Reliable: “Of a person, information, etc.: able to be trusted; in which reliance or confidence may be placed; trustworthy, safe, sure.” Reliable: “Of a product, service, etc.: consistently good in quality or performance; dependable.”
Source: Oxford English Dictionary
As we can see, none of the definitions above are anywhere close to being synonyms of the words “Official” or “Supervised”. A product can be both official and supervised by the author while also not providing reliable information. This is true when it comes to information of any type about any series in general, and it’s also true when it comes to information concerning One Piece powerscaling specifically
Reliable ≠ Official
Reliable ≠ Supervised
Reliable = Trustworthy, Safe, Dependable (for a particular purpose)
First-hand content from Oda directly about the manga — like the SBS — is already a given when it comes to reliability, of course, but what about everything else? Following the definitions we just established, how do we define a product that is “reliable” for accurately powerscaling the One Piece manga?
To that end, it would have to be a product that we can empirically prove “can be trusted because it behaves well” (behaves well for a purpose, in this case powerscaling the manga), or that we can empirically prove is “consistently good in performance” (in this case a good performance means providing accurate powerscaling for the manga)
In other words;
A third-party product is only reliable for powerscaling the manga effectively when it can be empirically proven that the information it provides translates to accurate estimations of the real abilities and real scaling of characters in the actual manga
A.2) How do we apply these concepts?
When evaluating any particular source, an useful approach that allows us to put things into perspective is to just ask three simple questions. Is the source official? Is it approved or supervised by the author? Is it reliable for powerscaling the manga? We’ll see that a positive response to the first two questions does not imply a positive response to the last question
Oda took part in One Piece Film: Strong World, in which pre-timeskip Luffy beats old Shiki 1. Is Strong World official? Yes, it’s not fanmade, this was 100% an official project from Toei and Shueisha 2. Is it supervised by Oda? Yes, he even had a hand in writing the story himself. Nothing made it into the film without his own foreknowledge and compliance 3. Is it reliable for powerscaling the manga? Hell no. Post Thriller Bark Luffy with no training, no Haki, no Gear 4, no awakening is not beating an old legend no matter how you spin it
We didn’t have to dig deep at all to find a suitable example. Information from a perfectly official source with Oda’s very own supervision and shiny stamp of approval can be unreliable for powerscaling the manga. The same can be said for a myriad of other sources with information that had Oda’s supervision or his personal approval
Novels, shows, games, films, magazines— I’m sure there are plenty of examples you can come up with of One Piece products that are official and fully supported by the author while also not being reliable for powerscaling the manga effectively
 

B) Merchandise

 
B.1) What is merchandise?
Crudely, merchandise is defined as “goods to be bought and sold”. However, in the distinct context of the anime and manga industry that is relevant to the subject we are discussing, the more appropriate definition would be:
branded products used to promote a film, pop group, etc., or linked to a fictional character; merchandising”
Source for both definitions: Oxford Languages
Going by its definition, merchandise refers to branded products used to promote. The role of merchandise is not to give an accurate depiction of manga characters and events, but to make sales, create hype and get more people invested in the source material and buying other official products. In essence, it exists to promote the brand and cash in on its popularity
The landscape of merchandise includes an incredibly vast assortment of products (and services or experiences) ranging from figurines to keychains to apparel to concerts to theme parks to fanbooks. In this post we will, of course, be dealing specifically with the latter. Currently, all existing arguments vouching for the reliability of a particular medium specifically concern databooks and — especially — Vivre Cards, while there are no notable arguments for magazines and other forms of media being reliable to powerscale the actual manga. Consequently, when mentioning merch from now on we will mostly be referring to databooks and Vivre Cards— which also happen to be the most prominent source for merch scaling by far
B.2) What are Vivre Cards?
For those who may not know, Vivre Cards are official two-page character outlines about One Piece characters— to give a few examples; the Vivre Cards of Blackbeard, Kin'emon and Marco. These cards are sold separately in many different packs/sets and meant to be progressively collected in the “Vivre Card ~One Piece Illustrated Encyclopedia~” databook, which is an initially empty binder book designed to store these collectible cards. Basically, it’s like a One Piece version of those popular World Cup collection albums
In the “Profile” page of a card we can find a profile with miscellaneous information about the character, including completely original details not found in the manga (depending on the character), like their age or bounty. On the “Essence” page of a card we will find character-relevant panels ripped straight from the manga, each accompanied with a paragraph of text describing it, much like you would find in an online wiki page. This text is popularly referred to as “flavor text”, which is roughly a synonym for fluff or filler text. Most of the examples of the images above come from Vivre Card flavor text
Contrary to popular belief, Vivre Cards are not written by Oda, his editors, or even anyone within the Shueisha company or its affiliates, despite Oda’s name being on the cover of card packs (including credit to the author of the source material is standard practice for derivative material, in and outside of the manga and anime industry). While Oda does provide his supervision plus some original character details and sketches, Vivre Cards are, in fact, outsourced to a book production company called Caramel Mama (キャラメル・ママ), which is in charge of the creation and publishing of the card packs
Any information about the specifics of Caramel Mama’s services and work history can be found in close detail on their website. They are specialized in the elaboration of manga and anime promotional merchandise, so you may already be familiar with some of their products from other series
Artur from the Library of Ohara, the most well-known Vivre Card translator in the One Piece community (you’ve likely seen his translations before), has his own explanation about Vivre Cards, which can serve as a compliment to this post for anyone interested. You can also find here his translations of the first batch of Vivre Cards, in which he describes in detail the anatomy of the cards and breaks down the information they contain
B.3) What are databooks?
Databooks (also known as fanbooks) are a number of books which contain a wide array of information about the story, world and characters of One Piece. This group includes the prominent collection of the 5 color-themed databooks as well as other separate individual booklets like Volume Stampede, for example. As of now, no sources claim Oda personally writes or even supervises databooks, although he does provide tidbits of original info and sketches, just as he does with Vivre Cards (we will go over this in-depth later on)
Unlike Vivre Cards, which have very specific and standardized formats and topics, databook content has great variety in format and subject matter, including sections like interviews, games, gag strips, concept art, behind-the-scenes info, etc. Here is an excerpt from databook One Piece Green: Secret Spices, which gives us a peek at what the content of a more typical section of a databook looks like. As we can see, it’s composed of flavor text highlighting characters and recapping manga events, containing no original information
Let’s use the Road to Laugh Tale booklet to check out a couple of very popular claims which serve as opportune examples of how databooks operate. Rocks straight up confirmed to be stronger than Primebeard? An skewed reference to Sengoku stating in the manga that he was perhaps Roger’s greatest foe (Ch. 957). Shanks being too much for the Gorosei to handle? Again, an exaggerated reference to the Gorosei’s comments in the manga (Ch. 233)
When it comes to powerscaling claims, taking manga events and statements and paraphrasing them in a severely embellished manner is the standard methodology of databooks, every bit as much as it is for other sources of flavor text
 
 

3- Addressing the arguments for merch being reliable

 
As of now there are three prevalent arguments vouching for the validity of promotional merch, which we will be thoroughly addressing one by one in this section. As mentioned before, databooks and Vivre Cards are the only formats with arguments to fall back on, so those are the two sources we will be chiefly referring to in regard to merch
 

A) Oda has mentioned merch in the SBS

 
One of the two most common arguments cites Oda referencing on more than one occasion exclusive material provided by himself for databooks, as well as describing Vivre Cards as being for “readers who want to know everything”. What do these author comments tell us about the reliability of promotional merch to powerscale the manga? Let’s find out
A.1) Reviewing the SBS statements
First, let’s check out every one of these instances and all additions Oda claims to have provided for merch in his SBS answers: * • SBS 293: Oda shares sketches of a pair of gag characters he mentioned in fanbook One Piece: Blue * • SBS 451: Oda references descriptions he provided of a few devil fruits belonging to marines for fanbook One Piece: Yellow * • SBS 695: Oda brings up a name he provided of a background Whitebeard fleet pirate for fanbook One Piece: Green * • SBS 914: Oda names Galette’s devil fruit and says that SBS and Vivre Cards are for “people who really want to know everything” * ○ Note: the Viz version mistranslated “ONE PIECE図鑑もありますので” as just “bonus materials” instead of “ONE PIECE Illustrated Encyclopedia” (which is specifically the name of the Vivre Card binder book, as mentioned earlier) * • SBS 982: Oda addresses the name of a Roger pirate according to fanbook One Piece: Blue Deep differing from his name in the manga, by urging to call him whatever or just not bother with his name at all * • SBS 997: Oda discloses trivia about Jinbe and mentions that Jinbe’s favorite foods were already revealed in his Vivre Card * • Vol. 108 SBS: More recently, Oda also referenced a name he provided of Roger’s sword for his Vivre Card
Now, what do all of these additions from Oda have in common? 1. They are NOT about powerscaling 2. They are NOT related to flavor text or retellings/summaries of the manga in any way, shape or form 3. They are completely original worldbuilding tidbits (character names, weapon names, fruit names)
Without fail, every single thing Oda comments about is a piece of trivia or original knowledge that he provided for external sources, and not one of his comments even tangentially references the endless paragraphs of hyperbolic flavor text that are published in them
Based on the examples he himself puts forward in his SBS comments, we can see that by “know everything,” Oda is alluding to niche knowledge like design sketches, character names, devil fruit names— all entirely original content that he actually needs to come up with on his own. Unlike flavor text, none of these things are subjective reinterpretations of already published panels that anyone could just see for themselves in the manga volumes
There is no explicit or implicit indication to be found here of Oda writing or supervising merch flavor text, or of any personal participation beyond the names and sketches he provides. The argument “Oda has brought up databooks in the SBS” may sound sensible at first glance, however, when we take the time to actually look into these SBS comments and what they are communicating, we will find that there’s hardly any evidence at all supporting the reliability of flavor text for powerscaling the manga
In short, what Oda himself is personally contributing and sharing with us through databooks and other merch is not the recycled flavor text, but just the previously unheard of tidbits of info that are meant to enrich the worldbuilding and carry no major implications in the manga
A.2) Oda’s philosophy on bonus materials
In order to shine a light on Oda’s personal stance on bonus material and non-manga sources, here are a few insightful quotes from the man himself:
“First and foremost, I am a manga artist. I don’t create anime, and that’s that. But I do help out with character design for original anime stories and movies based on my manga. I don’t really do much. So I have to entrust the world and characters of One Piece, which I created in the manga, to other people”
SBS 194
“Stuff that’s talked about in SBS really doesn’t need to be remembered for the main story. I don’t talk about certain things in the main story because I omitted them on purpose. I think that too much unnecessary information will only confuse the readers. So please enjoy the stuff in SBS strictly as an extra.”
SBS 569
“Not remembering their names won’t affect your ability to understand the story. If I don’t make a character’s name clear enough through the story, it’s not that important of a name to begin with”
SBS 730
“Because the motto of the SBS is “you’re not missing out if you don’t read it”!!”
SBS 846
“You’re right that there’s a lot of Devil Fruit powers here, but it would bog everything down to stop and explain them all, so my idea is, if it’s not central to the story, just breeze through and take it all in stride!”
SBS 914
Oda’s opinion on bonus materials expressed throughout his many comments can’t get much more clear-cut than this, and has remained perfectly consistent for over 20 years. The manga is the manga and everything else comes last. Oda is determined to include any and all even remotely relevant information directly in the manga, and when the series is 1000+ chapters, you know he’s not bluffing. If it’s not in the manga, it wasn’t important to begin with— his words, not mine
Not only has Oda made the claim, but he has also proved through his actions that he has no qualms about taking a hands-off approach on non-manga material and entrusting projects, especially merch, to other people. When he actually does get involved in something, you know that it will be relentlessly promoted and we won’t ever hear the end of it. Case in point: Oda’s involvement in the live-action series
Something that really stands out about these comments is that this is mostly the SBS that Oda is talking about, which actually happens to be a very reliable source written first-hand by the author himself. Even though it’s the most reliable source there is outside of the actual manga pages, Oda still insists on the SBS being an inconsequential source to the point of choosing to repeatedly reiterate how you can dismiss it entirely, as anything of importance will be revealed in the manga
If that’s the author’s take on his very own work that is published on the actual manga volumes themselves, then what does that suggest about third-party products like databooks and Vivre Cards, which aren’t even first-hand sources like the SBS is?
Anybody who has read the SBS corner can testify to how stubbornly unwilling Oda is to reveal anything powerscaling related in his SBS comments. If the man is adamant on not giving away straight answers on his own personally written corner published in the manga, then it firmly stands to reason that he did not — in a completely out of character manner — decide to just casually settle in some external source years ago all the age-old debates and biggest powerscaling enigmas that are still being built up in the manga to this day
Let’s put forth the questions we posed before, concerning this specific argument: * • Is merch official? Yes, it’s supported by Shueisha * • Is merch supervised by Oda? No mention of that whatsoever from these comments * • Is merch trivia reliable? Yes, something like character names or fruit names are open-and-shut cases directly provided by Oda and not up for interpretation * • Is merch flavor text reliable for powerscaling the manga? Nothing in Oda’s SBS comments even begins to suggest that Oda had a hand in the flavor text from merch or that their powerscaling claims conduce to effective estimations of the reality in the manga. On the contrary, we now know for a fact that Oda is actively averse to giving away that kind of information outside of the actual manga pages
 

B) Oda supervises Vivre Cards

 
The most prominent argument out there in favor of merch reliability comes from a statement from One Piece editor Naito in an interview concerning Vivre Cards, in which he states that the cards are supervised by Oda. It’s also mentioned that Oda contributes information, which will be addressed in the next point— for now, let us just focus on the elephant in the room, that being Oda supervising the Vivre Cards. Reading the full interview before proceeding is recommended
Original source of the interview with editor Naito
English translation (images are unavailable)
B.1) Author supervision
Oda allegedly checks out Vivre Cards, which inevitably raises the question: is Oda just giving a routine thumbs up simply as a formality, or is he actively correcting flavor text to make sure every word printed in them is accurate to the reality in the manga?
To begin unraveling this topic, let's follow our methodology once again, but this time in the context of Vivre Cards instead of databooks: 1. Are Vivre Cards official? Absolutely. Although published by Caramel Mama, a simple search will confirm they are supported by Shueisha 2. Are Vivre Cards supervised by Oda? The answer is yes, according to editor Naito 3. Are Vivre Cards reliable for powerscaling the manga? Now this is the part where the editor statement falls short
Let’s remember the definition of reliability and its criteria that we defined earlier
A third-party product is only reliable for powerscaling the manga effectively when it can be empirically proven that the information it provides translates to accurate estimations of the real abilities and real scaling of characters in the actual manga
This editor statement by itself fails to prove that Vivre Card flavor text claims translate to accurate estimations of the real abilities and real scaling of characters in the actual manga. As we’ve seen with many projects approved or supervised by Oda before, author endorsement does not automatically guarantee that the powerscaling involved will translate to actual manga accuracy. When it comes to manga powerscaling, this statement does not give promotional merch a better standing credibility-wise than the live-action series or the films, which also have the benefit of counting with author supervision
To conclusively prove reliability, the merch needs a successful track record and consistency with manga showings, which is a qualification that — as we all know from reading the actual thing with our own eyes — merch spectacularly fails to fulfill. This is all the more so true for Vivre Cards, which are the single biggest culprit out there when it comes to churning out ridiculous claims
On paper there may truthfully be a certain level of supervision in place, but when we look at the claims made by the Vivre Cards, it really is nigh-impossible to argue that there’s actually any back-and-forth between Oda and the third-party writers about flavor text powerscaling with rectifications being produced as a result
B.2) Editors and their role
In order to apply some very relevant perspective to this discussion, it’s useful to keep in mind at all times that Shueisha is a business and its editors are businessmen. Shueisha is a company whose foremost concern is to maximize value for its shareholders by securing sales and earning as much profit as possible through any means available, while its editors’ ultimate priority is none other than to turn the franchise they are in charge of into a money printer
It’s a common misconception that editors are primarily artists, when in reality their job is first and foremost to handle the business side of a franchise. Editors are marketers, supervisors, representatives, publicists, salesmen and managers, and every decision they make reflects those roles. Editors of huge franchises are very, very high up on the corporate ladder, and you simply don’t get that far up in the hierarchy without proving that your motivation and actions align with the interests of the company and the shareholders
This is how you end up with editors issuing blatant false promises like the Straw Hats supposedly showing up in Ch. 1099. They did not choose to publish that preview because it was the statement with the most accuracy — which ISN’T their objective — but rather because it was the statement that would generate the most sales— which actually IS their objective
While Oda himself doesn’t mind being open about his indifference towards bonus material (as we went over in a previous section), you are never ever going to hear an editor in an interview declare that “the author approved this thing but didn’t really look into it that much” or that “he supervised it but didn’t really provide any meaningful feedback”, because author involvement is their biggest selling point and that’s how the entire marketing machine behind it works
Career-wise, every editor is highly incentivized to overpromise and put out the kind of idealized claims and half-truths that we often see from them. The system hinges on them asserting “Oda approves this thing and he wants you to buy it”, and that is why you should never expect to hear otherwise. Author involvement will always be susceptible to be overstated, and in this case it’s an easily verifiable truth for anyone reading the bizarre, contradicting statements that databooks and Vivre Cards are publishing
B.3) Information added by Oda
Now, as determined earlier, it’s time to go back and take a closer look at the interview, regarding Oda “adding missing information” to the Vivre Cards. As it turns out, Oda actively contributing to merch exclusively by providing concept sketches and background details in particular is an assessment that is even supported by the editor himself
Firstly, when the editor elaborates on the information being added by Oda, the accompanying image used to describe it specifically points out the yellow box from the “Profile” page and nothing else, along with the caption “Oda sensei's handwritten additional instructions”. As stated in the second section of this post, this yellow box from the “Profile” page contains an assortment of completely original knowledge that, unlike flavor text, no one could possibly interpret from manga panels, like a character’s exact height or birthday
Does any of this ring a bell? It probably does, because — unsurprisingly, knowing Oda’s MO — this is the exact same situation we went over recently. What we’ve been told about Vivre Cards is perfectly consistent with the information that we already know is the kind that Oda actually prefers to contribute to bonus material, based on his own SBS comments about merch that we just checked out and that exclusively reference trivia
Secondly, this is then even further confirmed by the next question and answer in the interview right after the aforementioned image and, much more importantly, we are told that flavor text is not even supposed to contain new information. Translation provided by ChatGPT:
Katsuhei: Whoa~~~ Oda-sensei is serious. Are there any first-time revelations?
Naito: There's quite a lot, like blood type and birthplace! Also, they've published rough sketches of Oda-san's character designs. It's information disclosure pushing the boundaries, getting pretty close to the edge (laughs).
Editor Naito is directly asked if there’s any brand new content being revealed for the first time in Vivre Cards, to which his answer is that the brand new content is the trivia information like blood types and birthplaces and the sketches from Oda. This cannot be stressed enough. Once again the editor refers specifically to concept drawings and the yellow box trivia from the “Profile” page as the material provided by Oda himself, while the flavor text in the “Essence” page isn’t even part of the equation. He then goes on to add that even just the trivia and sketches is already pushing it in terms of giving away info
What we have here is an explicit clarification straight from the horse’s mouth. The statement from the editor is as blunt, clear and conclusive an answer as there could ever possibly be on the topic. Same as databooks, the only original content Oda provides to Vivre Cards are trivia and sketches. Flavor text, from the very beginning, plain and simply has never been meant to contain original information at all in the first place. Its sole purpose is to serve as filler for the collectible cards based on information that is directly compiled from the manga. Fundamentally, “Essence” pages are no different from the subjectively interpreted character articles you can find in the One Piece Wiki, except in a physical format instead
To sum up: Vivre Card flavor text can agree with the manga, but it can’t add on original information to the manga or clarify any ambiguity in the manga because its one and only source is actually just the manga itself— it is by design not supposed to contain any new information or insights that weren’t unequivocally in the manga already. Any disagreement with the manga or any claim that wasn’t previously explicitly confirmed in the manga is not to be considered a new piece of reliable information, but rather a personal exaggeration or interpretation derived from the writer of that card
 

C) There is an official website that corrects Vivre Cards

 
Lastly, the third and least recurring argument is based on an official website geared towards correcting mistakes that were caught in Vivre Cards after their printing. The logic behind the argument being this one: any of the powerscaling claims that haven’t gotten a correction yet are reliable, otherwise they would have already been addressed in the website by now
Original source
English translation
Just like the previous two arguments, this is another case of an idea that can sound really solid on the surface, but utterly crumbles when you actually look at the source for yourself and get the full picture. What this argument fails to mention is the fact that the website covers a very specific set of mistakes, and powerscaling claims in flavor text are simply not part of that group
The entire argument hangs on the assumption of there being a precedent for erroneous flavor text claims being corrected in the website, which would in turn mean that the claims that haven’t been corrected were ultimately considered accurate. Except, no such precedent exists in the first place. There is not one example of an erroneous powerscaling claim being corrected. The website deals with a narrow range of issues and has never dabbled into the subject of flavor text powerscaling, ever
Anyone is free to check the website for themselves and confirm it. You can read every single correction in the page from top to bottom and will find nothing but “fixed typo, fixed year, fixed name”. Even the page’s own description refers to itself as correcting “typographical errors”
So, is someone going to go back and update the list to add “My bad, Sentomaru isn’t actually an impregnable guard”? No, not at all. Nobody is showing up to take back statements that pertain to powerscaling, after hundreds and hundreds of Vivre Cards have already been published and there hasn’t been a single instance of a flavor text powerscaling claim being updated yet
If someone wrote that the Germa Kingdom is from the South Blue instead of the North Blue and corrected it, or wrote that the name of the Cocoyasi Village sheriff is Gen instead of Genzo and corrected it, does that somehow make it true that Katakuri is the strongest paramecia in his family and has flawless offense and defense? No— fixing trivial mistakes like a name or a number is something completely unrelated to flavor text powerscaling claims, and under no possible reasoning whatsoever does it prove their credibility
For the last time we make our questions, in the context of this argument: 1. Are Vivre Cards official? Yes, same as before 2. Are Vivre Cards supervised by Oda? No mention of Oda involvement from this website, but as we know from the editor interview earlier, the answer is still yes 3. Are Vivre Cards reliable for powerscaling the manga? Nothing about this website supports the notion of Vivre Cards being reliable for powerscaling the manga, especially when the particular cases that are handled by the website are completely removed from the area of flavor text powerscaling and doesn’t acknowledge it even once
With that, we reached the Reddit post character limit. You may continue reading through the Google Doc here, or in the comments if you sort by top or controversial, depending on how the post is received
submitted by AdmiralMizufugu to OnePieceScaling [link] [comments]


2024.05.17 18:59 tek_mob Cashback Travel Credit Card Recommendation - Template Followed

Current Cards

FICO Score

Currently Experian sitting at 712, and Equifax at 720.

Oldest Account Age

August 27 2018 so 5 years 9 months or so.

Chase 5/24 Status

9/24

Income

$160,000 base income, bonus depends just started my new job so not sure how that works. Get about an additional $15k a year in dividends and capital gains from investments so about $175,000 a year total.

Average Monthly Spend and Categories

Open to Buisness Cards

No

What is the Purpose of Your Next Card?

Looking for a decent travel card that I can use for when I go traveling that will also help increase credit limits and tie into rest of my system. Ideally cashback as I find points to be too confusing to use plus I often end up earning too little for it to be able to redeem for flights, and even when I do the domestic flights I want are often the same price in cash.
Either this or something to compliment one of my main spend areas.
Looking to avoid banks with minimum redemption limits.

Do you have any cards you have been looking at?

Are You Okay with Category Spending

Absolutely, it’s what I mostly do at the moment. Do want to avoid too many cards as beyond like 5-6 I think it gets too complicated. Simplifying things is highly valuable to me over perfecting everything.
submitted by tek_mob to CreditCards [link] [comments]


2024.05.17 17:54 IrishGameDeveloper New security offerings, briefly explained

Hello!
Anyway, I just had a read of the S-3ASR form, and I have to say, it's quite interesting.
It seems many of you have just read "share offering" and called it a day. But that's not really what this form is about.
Disclaimer: I am not a financial advisor. I may understand some of these things wrong, so if you do spot anything incorrect- tell me and I will fix it. As always, debating things objectively has been a historical strong point of this subreddit, and I expect no different here.
I highly recommend reading this document if you have time. Form your own opinion based off what Gamestop provides, not what someone on the bird website says. Just look at what the form states:
We encourage you to read our periodic and current reports. We think these reports provide additional information about our company which prudent investors find important.
There are some interesting tidbits in the cautionary statement regarding forward-looking statements. I personally liked this one, although it may be standard to mention. I have no idea.
volatility in our common stock price, including volatility due to potential short squeezes
Anyway, my main objective here is only to describe the potential new securities which gamestop is offering. Let's do it per section in the document.
CAPITAL STOCK
DEPOSITARY SHARES
WARRANTS
STOCK PURCHASE CONTRACTS
UNITS
SUBSCRIPTION RIGHTS
So, that's a very brief and simplistic overview, and I've probably missed LOADS. What is interesting, is how these securities can be offered- they don't necessarily have to go through any markets, and can be sold directly from gamestop or from whatever depository/agent they choose. And, we all know that the manipulation of this stock is happening IN the market. Remove the market, remove the manipulation...?
It appears to me, what gamestop is doing, is akin to them putting on a massive suit of armor, a new sword, and filling up the war chest.
Read the document guys. There's lots of interesting stuff mentioned there.
I am not a financial advisor.
submitted by IrishGameDeveloper to Superstonk [link] [comments]


2024.05.17 14:00 Snushy_101 Spocket Customer Service: Contact for Help

Spocket Customer Service: Contact for Help
Looking for top-notch customer service for your ecommerce business? Wondering how to elevate your customer experience with Spocket? Imagine having access to dedicated support around the clock. Curious about the secrets to exceptional service that sets Spocket apart from the rest? Eager to discover how quick and hassle-free the service can be to resolve any inquiries or concerns promptly? Dive into this post for insights on maximizing your Spocket experience through unparalleled customer service.
Useful Links:
  1. Spocket LifeTime Deal
  2. Spocket Free Trial

Key Takeaways

  • Proactive Communication: Reach out to Spocket's customer support team promptly via email, chat channel, or service for any issues or inquiries to ensure a smooth experience.
  • Utilize Resources: Take advantage of Spocket's resources and guides to effectively manage returns, refunds, and any challenges that may arise in the retail service industry.
  • Efficient Problem-Solving: When facing difficulties with dropshipping through Spocket, leverage their customer service to navigate and resolve issues promptly.
  • Stay Informed: Regularly check for updates and changes in Spocket's services, products, email, and review to stay informed and adapt your dropshipping strategy accordingly.
  • Feedback Loop: Provide feedback to Spocket based on your experiences to help improve their services and enhance the overall customer experience.
  • Continuous Learning: Engage in ongoing learning about dropshipping best practices and utilize Spocket's support service to enhance your business growth via email or chat channel.

Understanding Spocket's Service

Curated Platform

Spocket provides a curated platform connecting businesses with qualified suppliers. This ensures access to high-quality products.
The platform's vetting process guarantees that only reputable suppliers are onboarded, enhancing the overall reliability of the products available.
https://preview.redd.it/oawdx7u28z0d1.png?width=816&format=png&auto=webp&s=1ec016bc7c182f79689fa62d637912791a75c175
Start soaring 🚀 with Spocket's free trial! Dive into top products from US & EU suppliers today.

Commission Structure

Spocket operates on a commission structure for referrals. Users earn a commission for every successful referral made through their unique link.
This incentivizes users to promote the platform, fostering a community-driven approach to expanding Spocket's user base and supplier network.

Priority Regions

Spocket has priority regions for supplier approval. These regions are strategically selected based on demand and supplier capabilities.

Reaching Out to Customer Support

24/7 Support

Access 24/7 customer support to resolve any inquiries promptly. Whether it's day or night, assistance is just a message away.
Utilize the convenience of email and live chat options to connect with customer support swiftly. Immediate responses ensure that your issues are addressed efficiently.

Ease of Contact

Discover how easy it is to reach out for help. Within minutes, you can have a resolution to your concerns, thanks to the hard work of the dedicated support team.
Customer satisfaction is a top priority, and the team at Spocket ensures that every customer query is handled with care and efficiency.

Managing Returns and Refunds

Understanding Variability

Retailers must grasp the variability in return policies among different suppliers, which may experience changes. This diversity can affect customer satisfaction and operational efficiency. It's crucial for us to align internal policies with those of suppliers.

Spocket's Expertise

Spocket holds authority in handling extreme return cases, ensuring fair resolutions for both parties. Their streamlined process enhances online store operations by minimizing disruptions caused by returns.
Useful Links:
  1. Spocket LifeTime Deal
  2. Spocket Free Trial

Importance of Policies

Recognizing the significance of supplier return policies is vital for retailers. Clear guidelines prevent misunderstandings and establish trust with customers. Effective policies contribute to a seamless shopping experience.

Navigating Dropshipping with Spocket

Onboard Resellers

Spocket offers a user-friendly interface, simplifying the onboarding process for resellers. New sellers can easily sign up and start browsing products within minutes. The platform provides seamless synchronization with e-commerce stores, ensuring efficient management of inventory and orders.

Expanding Distribution Channels

By partnering with Spocket, resellers can tap into a vast network of suppliers from around the world. This enables them to expand their product offerings and reach a broader customer base. The diverse range of products available on Spocket allows resellers to cater to various niches and target markets.

Earning Commission

One of the key benefits of bringing retailers to Spocket is the opportunity to earn commissions. For each retailer that signs up through a referral link, resellers receive a commission on every sale made by that retailer. This incentivizes resellers to actively promote Spocket and recruit new retailers, creating a mutually beneficial relationship between all parties involved.

Summary

You've now gained valuable insights into Spocket's customer service, how to reach out for support, manage returns and refunds, and navigate dropshipping effectively. By understanding these aspects, you're better equipped to run your business smoothly and address any issues that may arise. Remember, clear communication and timely action are key when dealing with customer service matters. Utilize the resources available to you through Spocket's support channels to ensure a positive experience for both you and your customers.
Take charge of your dropshipping journey with Spocket by implementing the strategies discussed. Stay proactive in managing customer inquiries, handling returns professionally, and optimizing your dropshipping operations. Your dedication to providing excellent customer service will set you apart in the competitive e-commerce landscape. Keep learning and adapting to enhance your business further.
Ready, set, grow! 🌱 Tap into Spocket's free trial for seamless dropshipping from the best suppliers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What services does Spocket offer?

Spocket offers dropshipping services for e-commerce businesses, allowing them to source products from suppliers globally. They provide tools for order processing, inventory management, and automated fulfillment.

How can I contact Spocket's customer support?

You can easily reach out to Spocket's customer support team by accessing the "Contact Support" feature within your account dashboard. They offer email support and live chat assistance to help with any inquiries or issues.

What is the process for managing returns and refunds with Spocket?

To manage returns and refunds with Spocket, you need to follow their guidelines outlined on their website. Typically, you would initiate a return request through your account, providing necessary details for processing refunds based on their policies.

Is navigating dropshipping with Spocket user-friendly?

Yes, navigating dropshipping with Spocket is user-friendly due to its intuitive platform design. You can easily browse products, add them to your store, and manage orders seamlessly. Their system streamlines the dropshipping process for efficient operations.

Can I track my orders when using Spocket's services?

Absolutely! With Spocket, you have access to order tracking features that allow you to monitor the status of each order in real-time. This transparency ensures you can keep your customers informed about their purchases for a better shopping experience.
Useful Links:
  1. Spocket LifeTime Deal
  2. Spocket Free Trial
submitted by Snushy_101 to ReviewsFactory [link] [comments]


2024.05.17 07:43 WowHow06 RWA and DePin Take Over From Meme Coins and NFTs

Asset tokenization is gaining traction, with BlackRock’s CEO Larry Fink even calling it the “next generation for markets.” This shift puts a spotlight on RWA (Real-World Asset) projects, which are making this concept a reality. Essentially, these projects tokenize real-world assets like real estate, royalties, securities, contracts, ETFs, and art using blockchain technology.
This revolutionizes how investors interact with these assets, making them more accessible and easier to trade. Tokenization promotes fractional ownership, allowing individuals to own shares of assets they couldn’t otherwise afford. This increased accessibility and tradability mean previously illiquid assets will become more liquid, and all asset classes are expected to see an influx of new money. The RWA industry is projected to become a trillion-dollar market by 2030. RWA projects will serve as the conduits for this new liquidity, which is why crypto investors should pay close attention and consider positioning themselves accordingly.
Similarly, the DePin (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks) market holds immense potential. These projects leverage blockchain technology and tokenization to manage physical infrastructure such as telecommunications, health systems, power grids, and road networks in a decentralized manner. Unlike traditional companies, DePin projects benefit from simplified operations and reduced costs due to their decentralized nature. Users are also incentivized with tokens to contribute to the services these projects offer.
With such promising potential, the shift from meme coins and NFTs to RWA and DePin projects seems imminent. These projects could already be leading the charge, given their recent successes compared to meme coins and NFT projects in this cycle.
submitted by WowHow06 to SatoshiStreetBets [link] [comments]


2024.05.16 23:11 Weathers_Writing They call Silicon Valley the tech capitol of the world. They're wrong

I won't disclose its actual location, so if that's why you're here, sorry to disappoint. It's not time for that yet. However, I do think it's time to start getting the word out. I've noticed an increase in what I'll call "Antennas" lately, or people who can detect cross-planar phase shifts. Without getting into all the math (some of which I don't even know), this is basically a phenomenon which refers to entropy seeping into our universe from other realms or universes or whatever you want to call it. Simply put, people think our universe is a closed system to entropy, meaning that the disorder of any variable in our universe can only increase or decrease in direct proportion to other variables in that same system (the universe). Under this precept, we can establish rules like the Laws of Thermodynamics, and for most people, they're effective. But not for Antennas.
Put another way, if you throw a bunch of bouncy balls into a box, there are a number of different configurations that the balls could take on, with different speeds and magnitudes. You can calculate all of those if you have the right numbers. Now let's say you throw in another set of balls that you don't consider in your calculations of the initial set. Well, then you're not going to get an accurate picture of what's happening. Most people only see the first set and calculate based on that, but some people can see two, three, four or more sets.
You'll understand the concept better when I tell you the story, but I wanted to give you a primer on an important concept that will help you understand why this place, which I'll call "Area X", exists, and what the goals of the people who work there are.
Also note that I'm going to be using the alias "Trent" moving forward. Please refer to me as such in any direct messages.
***
Eighteen years ago I started working as an independent Home Inspector. I dropped out of community college after my first semester (not because I didn't find some of the subjects interesting, but because deference to a man or woman has never been my style) and started working some odd jobs. I did construction work for a couple years, then plumbing. I even drove a garbage truck for six months. I've always found pleasure in using my hands, and getting dirty was never a problem for me. Still, having a boss really dragged ass, so I spent my free time working on creating my own business. It took a few years and lots of savings, but I finally managed to get basic set of Home Inspection equipment: Tyvek coveralls, a cheap half-face respirator, voltage & AFCI/GFCI testers, CO2 and radon monitors, an IR camera, and telescoping mirrors in addition to the boots, safety glasses, electric gloves, ladder, and toolkits I already had on hand.
My buddy at the time was in the business, but he was moving off to the coast, so he helped me get set up and even introduced me to some of his clients. Of course, by that time I had already gotten my State license, but I still was a bit apprehensive to work with insurance agencies. I thought I could make a living working independently, inspecting for mold or sizing up a house for a prospective buyer. Eventually, though, I realized I should probably take every job available to me.
Easing into the business went about as well as it could have. The clients my friend referred to me were very satisfied with my work, and I was able to retain them. Then, in order to increase my reach, I hired someone on Fiverr to build a website for my company which led to a marked increase in traffic and conversions. About six months through, I began to get on a first-name basis with the boys and girls down down at Allstate and Progressive, and they fed me some of the bigger cases. In fact, I got so booked by year's end that I had to hire someone to help manage my schedule and the Excel spreadsheet with all my finances. I capped off a successful year with a 5-star Google rating and a trip to Ireland to visit some family and friends and get piss drunk. When I got back, it was the grindstone all over again, until the summer when I discovered… well, you'll see.
First off, I want to say that I was never one to believe in the paranormal. I grew up watching the movies and hearing the ghost stories round the campfire like every other kid, but it never struck a chord with me. If I can't touch it or see it or hear it, does it really exist? Probably not. So don't go thinking this was a scared man seeing his own shadow. That being said, I had this sense that something was off about this house when I parked along the curb and looked through a large window, perhaps two times the size of my van, to a dingy, dark foyer.
The entire neighborhood was stacked with upper-middle class domiciles, though it seemed like only two thirds of them were occupied, mostly by professionals who commuted to the City every weekday, and the rest were empty. As a man who understands real estate, to say this was strange would be an understatement. Still, I had no problem appraising the mini-mansion for a couple of newlyweds looking to enter the community. I did some research on the property ahead of time, and it seems that it was owned by a couple of old timers who had gone off the grid some time ago. The water and electric bill were both unpaid dating back to 2004 (it was June of '06 now). The bank had repo'd the house (which only had about 100k left on it) and held it for a year and a half before putting it back on the market. I tried to find out more about the old couple who vanished, but there was nothing in the news.
I stepped out of the van in my coveralls and grabbed my suitcase which had my mask, gloves, and eye protection in it. I liked to do a preliminary survey first, running an eye test on the exterior then interior before bringing out the big guns (that way I could identify the areas where I think there could be problems instead of running a metal detector over the whole damn ocean seaboard). I was about to do just that when the window caught my eye again. It felt uncharacteristic of me to be so occupied with this window, but I detoured to the front porch and peeked inside anyway.
Most of the furniture had already been moved out, meaning all that was left was a single three-seater couch, a couple candlesticks on the fireplace mantle, a pristine chandelier overtop a dining room table, and the kitchenware: an oven, gas stovetop, marble countertops, and an island. I could see into the living room very clearly with the afternoon light, but the dining room was dim enough that there were a few structures I couldn't quite make out in the distance. One of them appeared to be some kind of china cabinet or bookshelf—I figured it was the former considering where it was located. The other shadow looked kind of like a grandfather clock. Or at least that's what I thought until it moved.
When I say it "moved", I don't mean to say that it picked up and walked away. If you're not familiar with the Necker Cube, I suggest you search it up, because that kind of illusion is the best way to describe what I saw. At first I was seeing the grandfather clock in a certain way—pushed into the corner of the room—and the next second my vision "corrected" and it was maybe five feet to the left of its former position. I shook my head and looked again and saw the grandfather clock in its second orientation, standing in the center of the room against the wall. I figured I was just seeing things, but even so I spent a little extra time dawdling around the Egress window, taking notes, and delaying the interior inspection.
When I finally grew a pair and went inside, I walked straight to the dining room. Sure enough, the grandfather clock was stowed away in the corner of the room. I spent a couple minutes watching it with my pencil and travel notebook out. I'm the kind of guy that likes to collect hard data when the chips are down. Unfortunately, the clock apparently already had enough fun and was content with sweating me. Oh, well.
I fitted my pencil behind my ear and pocketed my travel notebook, then flipped the rest of the first floor lights on and completed my prelim. I concluded that everything was pretty standard. If anything, the house was in better shape than I'd expect considering it presumably hasn't been lived in for a couple years. I say "presumably" because one can never count out squatters, even during those times. Mainly I was expecting more dust build up and cobwebs than there were. Perhaps someone from the department had come by recently. It's unlikely, but possible.
I did the same check upstairs and it came back mostly clean. There was a bit of staining near the attic I wanted to check for mold. Based on its color, it was probably just a minor case of Aspergillus, but better safe than sorry. Then I got to the basement, and, well, let's just count out the idea of anyone dropping by. I don't know what I was expecting, but it certainly wasn't what I found.
The first thing that caught my eye was the long, slender body of a birch tree lying pale and dead across a large portion of the even larger unfinished basement's cement flooring. I had to do a double take to make sure I wasn't dreaming, but, yep, there it was. Its crown was sealed up in the wall with only its trunk hanging out, which made me think of those medieval pillory devices which locked up people's heads and arms. Then confetti-scattered around the tree and all over the basement floor was a minefield of broken glass and ceramic tangled up with a set of random objects. And when I say random, I mean random. There was an unfurled Somali flag (the blue one with a single star in the center), some packaged drinks and condiments branded with all sorts of different languages (I could only make out Gaelic and Chinese or Japanese, I couldn't quite tell), a broken dome-shaped security camera, an otoscope (the thing the doc uses to check your ears), Hot Wheels cars (okay that one isn't so strange), and the list goes on.
At that moment, I wasn't freaked out or disgusted. I was more or less just confused. I started walking through the rubble, trying to avoid the sharp fragments but pretty confident that my steel toed boots would crush most the pieces anyway, when I heard a clink just up ahead. I was able to spot the coin in time, just before it jingled to a halt atop an old Life magazine. I picked it up and noted right away its oval shape and bronze color—clearly not American made. I tried reading it, but not only was the language not English, it appeared to be so old that most of the lettering had been filed down. I looked up at the ceiling to see if it dropped from a shelf, but there was nothing that could have been holding the coin. I considered for a moment, looking around at the other junk, and had the crazy idea that maybe all this stuff just appeared here. I popped the coin in my pocket and headed back to the van when I stopped by the tree and realized something. It wasn't a birch tree—it was a palm tree. I just didn't realize because of how ashy and decayed the bark was.
Now at this point you might think I've been acting a little nonchalant for such a strange occurrence, and I don't blame you, but if you're gonna stick around with me that's just something you're gonna have to get used to. I guess I was just born with a screw loose, but I really don't scare easily, and I tend to look at everything pragmatically. If you dig deep enough, you'll always find another plausible explanation. That being said, I do want to get to the part about Area X, so let me give you the rundown on what I learned about this basement.
I ended up trekking back to the van and picking up my gear. I was no longer running the routine inspection, obviously, but I figured I might as well throw 30 thousand dollars of scanning equipment at whatever the fuck anamoly existed in that basement. Most of it came back negative. There was a bit higher-than-usual EM interference as picked up on the voltmeters, but nothing that screamed danger close. Still, it was enough for me to set up my volt testers and IR camera while muddling through the rest of the junk. I won't bore you with another list of items, but I did find one thing of value: a diamond necklace. And not just any diamond necklace, it was one of those Queen-wearing, multi-row, big-jeweled necklaces like out of some Historical Fiction movie from the thirties. I almost didn't pocket it because I'm used to expensive items being owned by someone… someone who might want it back. But I figured if there was ever a place the finder's keeper's rule applied, it was probably in this Quantum graveyard.
7 O'clock rolled around and I hadn't eaten. I'm a pretty bulky guy, carrying my share of both muscle and fat, and most people think that means I need to eat a ton but that's really not the case. Mostly I just get dehydrated easily, especially in the summer. That said, I was bordering on famished territory and considered heading out for a bite when I heard another sound. The first thing I did was check my scanners, and sure enough the voltage needle was fully spun to the right side of the dial. EM interference. Then I went to see what had dropped. I was able to pick the object out pretty quickly since I had spent the last 6 hours staring at the mosaic of a basement floor. It was a silver briefcase, like one of those out of a crime novel, and it was cracked open.
I had this sense then that I was standing at a precipice, and if I opened the briefcase and looked inside, I wouldn't be able to stop whatever would come afterwards. Part of me deep down knew that I was just that type of guy that had to know, and maybe this was my Hamlet moment where it would be a trait gone a step too far. But then again I didn't really believe in any of that sentimental bullshit, so I opened the briefcase.
The gun surprised me a little, but not as much as the piece of paper laid atop a case file reading in large black font, "FIND ME". I expected the envelope to have some missing person file in it, but instead there were all these schematics and blueprints for some kind of device. Whatever it was, it was pretty massive. Some of the lengths were hundreds of meters long. And what's more strange is based on the blueprint's locale, it appeared to be underground. I looked back through the pages a couple times, then checked the note—nothing strange there. The gun appeared to be a simple glock. I was no gun expert, but I had been to the range pretty regularly with my construction buddies, so I got used to the feel of a pistol and rifle and some of the different names; however, I realized pretty quickly it wasn't your standard glock when I couldn't find mag-release. That's when I noticed how light the gun felt. I tried to chamber a round, but again, there was no hammer. What the hell kind of gun was this?
I ended up throwing everything back in the briefcase, including the necklace, coin, and a few Koozies I found that were branded with one of my favorite sports teams (never let an opportunity go to waste). I put up all my shit back in the van and spun over to a local burger joint, got my fill, and went home. I made sure to draft an email to the prospective buyers, telling them the house had several patches of black mold and a bit of a rat problem before drifting off to sleep. Although I really didn't do much of that.
When I woke up, I took a cold shower and downed a can of Reign, then commuted to my gym and got a lift and some sauna time in before making the trip back to the house. I brought some extra supplies with me for some experiments I cooked up while not sleeping the previous night.
First, I had two camcorders set up on a couple tripods in either corner of the basement. I wanted clear footage of these mystery objects spawning in. Then I set up a voltmeter in a similar fashion, but I had a wire extending out of it on a circuit which fed to an alarm that would blare when the reading was over 250 volts. Upstairs, I rearranged some of the furniture so that the small number of tables, chairs, clock, cabinets, and other little pillows or vases I could find were scattered across the living room, dining room, and kitchen. Then I pulled up a lawn chair to the front porch window and waited.
I didn't have to wait long though. In about a minute, I started to notice some of the objects moving. It was strange. When a few of them would shift simultaneously, it was like looking at a holographic card that would change shape depending on where your eyes were in relation to the image. Every time I saw a shift, I felt an awkward feeling in my eyes. They went blurry for a fraction of a second, then there was a twinge of pain, as if my brain couldn't handle the contradictory stimulus. It didn't get more crazy than that though—until the alarm went off.
I had cracked open the small rectangular window in the basement to the side of the house so I would hear it. It took four hours and several strange stares from passersby walking their dogs before it rang, so I was a bit lost in my thoughts, but when I heard the beep I perked up fast. It lasted for maybe 5 seconds total, but what I saw was truly miraculous. The best way I can describe it is a pool of silver or gray or translucent light emerging in the foreground between me and the objects in the different rooms. A series of twisting tentacles sprouted from the gray octopus-like head and spun in a way that reminded me of that little kids ride at the amusement parks. Then the objects started to "heat up" is the way I describe it. Their position became relative, meaning they were here one second, there another, then they popped out of existence entirely. Suddenly the rooms were all empty, then they were full of things I had never seen before. Then five seconds passed and the octopus vanished and it was back to the same old objects in their usual places.
It took a few minutes to process what I saw, and even then I wasn't sure I really saw it. I went inside and looked around at my distribution of the house's furnishings. They were all there, intact. Then I went downstairs to check the cams. I rewinded a couple minutes and played it back, but there was no flying object to be found. Instead, there was some gray static that lasted half a second and then the object, a kid's treasure chest toy, was there on the ground. But you want to know the really strange part? I rewinded the tape again, and when I watched the footage back, the treasure chest was always there.
I later came to understand that these poppings in-and-out of our reality are only conceivable to a conscious mind that can track the interference patterns—not rote computational instruments. In fact, even most people can't do it (although everyone has at least a slight awareness of it, even if only subconsciously). Plus, locations like the basement of this house are very rare and kept under tight lock. That became obvious to me two days later when, after my normal morning routine, I pulled up to a driveway and curbside filled with unmarked government vehicles. Either bravely or stupidly, I pulled up to a few officers (they were wearing suits in 85 degree weather, so I assumed…) who were idling by the large fence of crime scene tape and asked them what the score was.
"There was a crime," said the short man with a unibrow.
"Oh, is that right? Damn shame. Someone break in? I have a niece who lives nearby, so…"
The man looked at his two compatriots, both of whom were wearing sunglasses and a "get this civilian fuck out of here" expressions. "Oh, yeah," he started in a reassuring tone that was so condescending it would have annoyed anyone except me, "we found a body. We think it was a homicide. Best to keep your kids away from here for a while."
I thumbed the stubble on my chin, my other hand outstretched on the wheel, and considered moving on, but my mouth had other ideas. "That right? But uh, isn't this house vacant? I mean, I don't remember no one living in it."
The short man, now tall with temper, said, "Yeah, some squatters. We think there was a dispute over some drug money. Nothing for you to worry about though, we got it under control. Now if you wouldn't mind moving along, we have a lot of work to do."
Oh, I'm sure you do, I thought, but only said, "Of course, sir, sorry for keeping you from your job." Then I rolled up the window and cruised on, keeping my eyes on the house which slowly diminished in the side-view mirror.
Luckily I had been smart enough to break down my camp and lug home all my equipment each night, so I didn't leave anything incriminating. I didn't move the furniture back, so maybe that would come back to haunt me, but considering the kind of shit going down in that house, I didn't think they would notice.
For any of you wondering about the conclusion of the house story, I went back a couple weeks later after the suits had left and the tape was taken down and confirmed that not only was the basement entirely cleaned out, but it was no longer exhibiting any strange properties. I looked for a story related to the house, maybe a made up murder of some kind, but there was nothing. That bastard lied to me and didn't even bother to cover his story up.
Now, in the aftermath of an event such as this, I really only had one of two options. I could forget it, move on, continue living life. The necklace was surely worth a fortune. I could sell it and have enough to retire, or at least hire enough people and expand my business large enough to retire within ten or so years. Or I could take all that money and invest it in my own PI business with only a single objective: finding out what those people knew, and why they were hiding it.
I think you know me well enough by now to guess which line of reasoning appealed more to me.
***
For the sake of brevity, I'm going to omit most of my encounters along the journey to discovering Area X. There's a lot to tell, and if it appeals to you perhaps I'd be willing to share at a later date, but for now I want to get this part of the story, the more proximal part, out in the open.
Three years ago, I discovered the source of what I'll call "The Receiver". This is the device that was schematized in the documents that I found in the briefcase. What it does is a complex answer, and how it does it is pretty much all speculation, but here's what I've been able to find out: this universe we live in is a node in a network of many other spaces. These spaces exist in higher dimensions that we cannot directly perceive, but using a conceivable analogy, just think about a flower with petals. The petals are these other dimensions which bleed into our world, which is at the center. However, it's not that pretty. We see the physical world through the lens of spacetime: sizes, speeds, etc. These other dimensions don't necessarily have space or time. In fact, what actually exists there, I couldn't say. The only data I have on them is from two sources: correspondence information and server data from the secret agency (which I'll call "the Organization") that keeps this under wraps, and first-hand experience with realms from these other entities, either directly (I experience it) or through the eyes of someone else with the same or greater abilities than I possess.
I referred to these people with abilities earlier as "Antennas", and I will continue to use the term. Antennas really come in three flavors, marked by the strength of their ability: weak Antennas, like me, are able to observe spontaneous interactions between our universe and other dimensions (phase shifts) when there is a strong force of collision like existed in the basement; moderate Antennas may see phase shifts occur at any point, and they usually are able to retain memories from across the different transformations; strong Antennas, and I don't know if they exist yet, but they are able to consciously interact with these other realms and cause phase shifts to occur.
I mentioned that moderate Antennas are able to retain memories from before and after a phase shift. Technically, all Antennas have this ability, but it's about degree. I can recall only very specific instances and without much detail. Moderates are usually able to pick out much more nuanced minutiae. At the lower end of moderate scale, most of those details fade or get fuzzy over time, but for the very strong Antennas, they hold onto almost everything. One other property that scales with strength is interaction with other conscious entities. Only a small percentage of moderates are able to do this. What's interesting is that these entities can possess (yes, like ghosts) people who aren't even antennas, but no one is aware of such possession at this deep of a level. I have several companions now, and only two have had interactions with these otherworldly beings. Not all of them are malevolent, some of them are whimsical or kind, but there are a fair share of demons out there.
Getting back to the point, Area X started as a government funded project in the 70's. At that time, they were focused on a few subjects: Artificial Intelligence, DNA sequencing, and psychedelics. Yes, they were part of the infamous LSD experiments. But they looked at these subjects through a common lens—there was something that the burgeoning tech industry, fueled by the advent of a commercial computer market, was missing. As the tech giants rose in the early 2000's and began to collect mass amounts of data, this other agency was decades ahead in a different metric, although it was completely (and still is) hidden from the public. Their efforts to understand psychedelic experiences led to a formalized method of understanding interactions between multiple realities. They built certain scanning equipment to detect anomalies like the one I found in the basement; although their tools were much more sophisticated and didn't utilize voltage readings. Then they ran tests in these areas. One area in particular is a hot-bed of phase shift interactions. That's where Area X is located (and the Receiver).
The Receiver is a giant electromagnetic orb that has trapped the kind of multi-dimensional energy that causes the phase shifts; since the Organization seized control of the lab, it's effectively become a map of the Earth in relation to these other worlds. For the past twenty or so years, the Organization has been studying this map, using the data big Tech companies have collected to essentially develop a Rosetta Stone for interpreting the meaning of the fluctuations in their scanning equipment. Recently, the public, though going the long way round, was actually pretty close to a breakthrough in this same department until recently when ultra-powerful LLMs surfaced, and the whole world began going down what I'd argue is the wrong rabbit hole of language processing. But I digress.
Area X is essentially a private military base built for defending the most impactful piece of technology ever invented. With the Receiver, the Organization now has the power to essentially predict any and all future outcomes, the only thing holding them back is the limitations of their own scanning equipment which will get better with time. To put it into perspective, the Organization has access to a kind of data allocation tool which in one day can produce over ten thousand times that the Big Data companies combined would be able to filter through in the next decade. You might think, then, that the problem is merely asymmetric power, and that is certainly a concern, but it isn't the main concern. The main issue is that this organization is actively recruiting (and kidnapping) Antennas from around the world in an effort to find or make one of them into a strong Antenna. In other words, they want a subject who is able not only to see the future, but to manipulate it at will.
balance to the world. I've been working on amassing resources, capital, and building my own team, and now I'm ready. You might ask why I'm posting this here. Wouldn't it be better to keep all this secret? Well, yes, it would be. But that's the problem. Nothing is secret anymore. They know about me and the others, and if I don't make a move, they will. In a way, this is a letter directly to the organization that I know, and I'm coming.
In a different way, I wanted to release this information to the public. There are lots of people out there waking up and realizing that the world they experience is not the one others experience. If you think you might be an Antenna, don't be afraid—you have a special gift that can be controlled. If you want more details on how to control it, or if you're interested in my mission, don't be afraid to reach out. This hasn't always been my life's work, but it is now.
At least until I die.
submitted by Weathers_Writing to weatherswriting [link] [comments]


2024.05.16 23:10 Weathers_Writing They call Silicon Valley the tech capitol of the world. They're wrong

I won't disclose its actual location, so if that's why you're here, sorry to disappoint. It's not time for that yet. However, I do think it's time to start getting the word out. I've noticed an increase in what I'll call "Antennas" lately, or people who can detect cross-planar phase shifts. Without getting into all the math (some of which I don't even know), this is basically a phenomenon which refers to entropy seeping into our universe from other realms or universes or whatever you want to call it. Simply put, people think our universe is a closed system to entropy, meaning that the disorder of any variable in our universe can only increase or decrease in direct proportion to other variables in that same system (the universe). Under this precept, we can establish rules like the Laws of Thermodynamics, and for most people, they're effective. But not for Antennas.
Put another way, if you throw a bunch of bouncy balls into a box, there are a number of different configurations that the balls could take on, with different speeds and magnitudes. You can calculate all of those if you have the right numbers. Now let's say you throw in another set of balls that you don't consider in your calculations of the initial set. Well, then you're not going to get an accurate picture of what's happening. Most people only see the first set and calculate based on that, but some people can see two, three, four or more sets.
You'll understand the concept better when I tell you the story, but I wanted to give you a primer on an important concept that will help you understand why this place, which I'll call "Area X", exists, and what the goals of the people who work there are.
Also note that I'm going to be using the alias "Trent" moving forward. Please refer to me as such in any direct messages.
***
Eighteen years ago I started working as an independent Home Inspector. I dropped out of community college after my first semester (not because I didn't find some of the subjects interesting, but because deference to a man or woman has never been my style) and started working some odd jobs. I did construction work for a couple years, then plumbing. I even drove a garbage truck for six months. I've always found pleasure in using my hands, and getting dirty was never a problem for me. Still, having a boss really dragged ass, so I spent my free time working on creating my own business. It took a few years and lots of savings, but I finally managed to get basic set of Home Inspection equipment: Tyvek coveralls, a cheap half-face respirator, voltage & AFCI/GFCI testers, CO2 and radon monitors, an IR camera, and telescoping mirrors in addition to the boots, safety glasses, electric gloves, ladder, and toolkits I already had on hand.
My buddy at the time was in the business, but he was moving off to the coast, so he helped me get set up and even introduced me to some of his clients. Of course, by that time I had already gotten my State license, but I still was a bit apprehensive to work with insurance agencies. I thought I could make a living working independently, inspecting for mold or sizing up a house for a prospective buyer. Eventually, though, I realized I should probably take every job available to me.
Easing into the business went about as well as it could have. The clients my friend referred to me were very satisfied with my work, and I was able to retain them. Then, in order to increase my reach, I hired someone on Fiverr to build a website for my company which led to a marked increase in traffic and conversions. About six months through, I began to get on a first-name basis with the boys and girls down down at Allstate and Progressive, and they fed me some of the bigger cases. In fact, I got so booked by year's end that I had to hire someone to help manage my schedule and the Excel spreadsheet with all my finances. I capped off a successful year with a 5-star Google rating and a trip to Ireland to visit some family and friends and get piss drunk. When I got back, it was the grindstone all over again, until the summer when I discovered… well, you'll see.
First off, I want to say that I was never one to believe in the paranormal. I grew up watching the movies and hearing the ghost stories round the campfire like every other kid, but it never struck a chord with me. If I can't touch it or see it or hear it, does it really exist? Probably not. So don't go thinking this was a scared man seeing his own shadow. That being said, I had this sense that something was off about this house when I parked along the curb and looked through a large window, perhaps two times the size of my van, to a dingy, dark foyer.
The entire neighborhood was stacked with upper-middle class domiciles, though it seemed like only two thirds of them were occupied, mostly by professionals who commuted to the City every weekday, and the rest were empty. As a man who understands real estate, to say this was strange would be an understatement. Still, I had no problem appraising the mini-mansion for a couple of newlyweds looking to enter the community. I did some research on the property ahead of time, and it seems that it was owned by a couple of old timers who had gone off the grid some time ago. The water and electric bill were both unpaid dating back to 2004 (it was June of '06 now). The bank had repo'd the house (which only had about 100k left on it) and held it for a year and a half before putting it back on the market. I tried to find out more about the old couple who vanished, but there was nothing in the news.
I stepped out of the van in my coveralls and grabbed my suitcase which had my mask, gloves, and eye protection in it. I liked to do a preliminary survey first, running an eye test on the exterior then interior before bringing out the big guns (that way I could identify the areas where I think there could be problems instead of running a metal detector over the whole damn ocean seaboard). I was about to do just that when the window caught my eye again. It felt uncharacteristic of me to be so occupied with this window, but I detoured to the front porch and peeked inside anyway.
Most of the furniture had already been moved out, meaning all that was left was a single three-seater couch, a couple candlesticks on the fireplace mantle, a pristine chandelier overtop a dining room table, and the kitchenware: an oven, gas stovetop, marble countertops, and an island. I could see into the living room very clearly with the afternoon light, but the dining room was dim enough that there were a few structures I couldn't quite make out in the distance. One of them appeared to be some kind of china cabinet or bookshelf—I figured it was the former considering where it was located. The other shadow looked kind of like a grandfather clock. Or at least that's what I thought until it moved.
When I say it "moved", I don't mean to say that it picked up and walked away. If you're not familiar with the Necker Cube, I suggest you search it up, because that kind of illusion is the best way to describe what I saw. At first I was seeing the grandfather clock in a certain way—pushed into the corner of the room—and the next second my vision "corrected" and it was maybe five feet to the left of its former position. I shook my head and looked again and saw the grandfather clock in its second orientation, standing in the center of the room against the wall. I figured I was just seeing things, but even so I spent a little extra time dawdling around the Egress window, taking notes, and delaying the interior inspection.
When I finally grew a pair and went inside, I walked straight to the dining room. Sure enough, the grandfather clock was stowed away in the corner of the room. I spent a couple minutes watching it with my pencil and travel notebook out. I'm the kind of guy that likes to collect hard data when the chips are down. Unfortunately, the clock apparently already had enough fun and was content with sweating me. Oh, well.
I fitted my pencil behind my ear and pocketed my travel notebook, then flipped the rest of the first floor lights on and completed my prelim. I concluded that everything was pretty standard. If anything, the house was in better shape than I'd expect considering it presumably hasn't been lived in for a couple years. I say "presumably" because one can never count out squatters, even during those times. Mainly I was expecting more dust build up and cobwebs than there were. Perhaps someone from the department had come by recently. It's unlikely, but possible.
I did the same check upstairs and it came back mostly clean. There was a bit of staining near the attic I wanted to check for mold. Based on its color, it was probably just a minor case of Aspergillus, but better safe than sorry. Then I got to the basement, and, well, let's just count out the idea of anyone dropping by. I don't know what I was expecting, but it certainly wasn't what I found.
The first thing that caught my eye was the long, slender body of a birch tree lying pale and dead across a large portion of the even larger unfinished basement's cement flooring. I had to do a double take to make sure I wasn't dreaming, but, yep, there it was. Its crown was sealed up in the wall with only its trunk hanging out, which made me think of those medieval pillory devices which locked up people's heads and arms. Then confetti-scattered around the tree and all over the basement floor was a minefield of broken glass and ceramic tangled up with a set of random objects. And when I say random, I mean random. There was an unfurled Somali flag (the blue one with a single star in the center), some packaged drinks and condiments branded with all sorts of different languages (I could only make out Gaelic and Chinese or Japanese, I couldn't quite tell), a broken dome-shaped security camera, an otoscope (the thing the doc uses to check your ears), Hot Wheels cars (okay that one isn't so strange), and the list goes on.
At that moment, I wasn't freaked out or disgusted. I was more or less just confused. I started walking through the rubble, trying to avoid the sharp fragments but pretty confident that my steel toed boots would crush most the pieces anyway, when I heard a clink just up ahead. I was able to spot the coin in time, just before it jingled to a halt atop an old Life magazine. I picked it up and noted right away its oval shape and bronze color—clearly not American made. I tried reading it, but not only was the language not English, it appeared to be so old that most of the lettering had been filed down. I looked up at the ceiling to see if it dropped from a shelf, but there was nothing that could have been holding the coin. I considered for a moment, looking around at the other junk, and had the crazy idea that maybe all this stuff just appeared here. I popped the coin in my pocket and headed back to the van when I stopped by the tree and realized something. It wasn't a birch tree—it was a palm tree. I just didn't realize because of how ashy and decayed the bark was.
Now at this point you might think I've been acting a little nonchalant for such a strange occurrence, and I don't blame you, but if you're gonna stick around with me that's just something you're gonna have to get used to. I guess I was just born with a screw loose, but I really don't scare easily, and I tend to look at everything pragmatically. If you dig deep enough, you'll always find another plausible explanation. That being said, I do want to get to the part about Area X, so let me give you the rundown on what I learned about this basement.
I ended up trekking back to the van and picking up my gear. I was no longer running the routine inspection, obviously, but I figured I might as well throw 30 thousand dollars of scanning equipment at whatever the fuck anamoly existed in that basement. Most of it came back negative. There was a bit higher-than-usual EM interference as picked up on the voltmeters, but nothing that screamed danger close. Still, it was enough for me to set up my volt testers and IR camera while muddling through the rest of the junk. I won't bore you with another list of items, but I did find one thing of value: a diamond necklace. And not just any diamond necklace, it was one of those Queen-wearing, multi-row, big-jeweled necklaces like out of some Historical Fiction movie from the thirties. I almost didn't pocket it because I'm used to expensive items being owned by someone… someone who might want it back. But I figured if there was ever a place the finder's keeper's rule applied, it was probably in this Quantum graveyard.
7 O'clock rolled around and I hadn't eaten. I'm a pretty bulky guy, carrying my share of both muscle and fat, and most people think that means I need to eat a ton but that's really not the case. Mostly I just get dehydrated easily, especially in the summer. That said, I was bordering on famished territory and considered heading out for a bite when I heard another sound. The first thing I did was check my scanners, and sure enough the voltage needle was fully spun to the right side of the dial. EM interference. Then I went to see what had dropped. I was able to pick the object out pretty quickly since I had spent the last 6 hours staring at the mosaic of a basement floor. It was a silver briefcase, like one of those out of a crime novel, and it was cracked open.
I had this sense then that I was standing at a precipice, and if I opened the briefcase and looked inside, I wouldn't be able to stop whatever would come afterwards. Part of me deep down knew that I was just that type of guy that had to know, and maybe this was my Hamlet moment where it would be a trait gone a step too far. But then again I didn't really believe in any of that sentimental bullshit, so I opened the briefcase.
The gun surprised me a little, but not as much as the piece of paper laid atop a case file reading in large black font, "FIND ME". I expected the envelope to have some missing person file in it, but instead there were all these schematics and blueprints for some kind of device. Whatever it was, it was pretty massive. Some of the lengths were hundreds of meters long. And what's more strange is based on the blueprint's locale, it appeared to be underground. I looked back through the pages a couple times, then checked the note—nothing strange there. The gun appeared to be a simple glock. I was no gun expert, but I had been to the range pretty regularly with my construction buddies, so I got used to the feel of a pistol and rifle and some of the different names; however, I realized pretty quickly it wasn't your standard glock when I couldn't find mag-release. That's when I noticed how light the gun felt. I tried to chamber a round, but again, there was no hammer. What the hell kind of gun was this?
I ended up throwing everything back in the briefcase, including the necklace, coin, and a few Koozies I found that were branded with one of my favorite sports teams (never let an opportunity go to waste). I put up all my shit back in the van and spun over to a local burger joint, got my fill, and went home. I made sure to draft an email to the prospective buyers, telling them the house had several patches of black mold and a bit of a rat problem before drifting off to sleep. Although I really didn't do much of that.
When I woke up, I took a cold shower and downed a can of Reign, then commuted to my gym and got a lift and some sauna time in before making the trip back to the house. I brought some extra supplies with me for some experiments I cooked up while not sleeping the previous night.
First, I had two camcorders set up on a couple tripods in either corner of the basement. I wanted clear footage of these mystery objects spawning in. Then I set up a voltmeter in a similar fashion, but I had a wire extending out of it on a circuit which fed to an alarm that would blare when the reading was over 250 volts. Upstairs, I rearranged some of the furniture so that the small number of tables, chairs, clock, cabinets, and other little pillows or vases I could find were scattered across the living room, dining room, and kitchen. Then I pulled up a lawn chair to the front porch window and waited.
I didn't have to wait long though. In about a minute, I started to notice some of the objects moving. It was strange. When a few of them would shift simultaneously, it was like looking at a holographic card that would change shape depending on where your eyes were in relation to the image. Every time I saw a shift, I felt an awkward feeling in my eyes. They went blurry for a fraction of a second, then there was a twinge of pain, as if my brain couldn't handle the contradictory stimulus. It didn't get more crazy than that though—until the alarm went off.
I had cracked open the small rectangular window in the basement to the side of the house so I would hear it. It took four hours and several strange stares from passersby walking their dogs before it rang, so I was a bit lost in my thoughts, but when I heard the beep I perked up fast. It lasted for maybe 5 seconds total, but what I saw was truly miraculous. The best way I can describe it is a pool of silver or gray or translucent light emerging in the foreground between me and the objects in the different rooms. A series of twisting tentacles sprouted from the gray octopus-like head and spun in a way that reminded me of that little kids ride at the amusement parks. Then the objects started to "heat up" is the way I describe it. Their position became relative, meaning they were here one second, there another, then they popped out of existence entirely. Suddenly the rooms were all empty, then they were full of things I had never seen before. Then five seconds passed and the octopus vanished and it was back to the same old objects in their usual places.
It took a few minutes to process what I saw, and even then I wasn't sure I really saw it. I went inside and looked around at my distribution of the house's furnishings. They were all there, intact. Then I went downstairs to check the cams. I rewinded a couple minutes and played it back, but there was no flying object to be found. Instead, there was some gray static that lasted half a second and then the object, a kid's treasure chest toy, was there on the ground. But you want to know the really strange part? I rewinded the tape again, and when I watched the footage back, the treasure chest was always there.
I later came to understand that these poppings in-and-out of our reality are only conceivable to a conscious mind that can track the interference patterns—not rote computational instruments. In fact, even most people can't do it (although everyone has at least a slight awareness of it, even if only subconsciously). Plus, locations like the basement of this house are very rare and kept under tight lock. That became obvious to me two days later when, after my normal morning routine, I pulled up to a driveway and curbside filled with unmarked government vehicles. Either bravely or stupidly, I pulled up to a few officers (they were wearing suits in 85 degree weather, so I assumed…) who were idling by the large fence of crime scene tape and asked them what the score was.
"There was a crime," said the short man with a unibrow.
"Oh, is that right? Damn shame. Someone break in? I have a niece who lives nearby, so…"
The man looked at his two compatriots, both of whom were wearing sunglasses and a "get this civilian fuck out of here" expressions. "Oh, yeah," he started in a reassuring tone that was so condescending it would have annoyed anyone except me, "we found a body. We think it was a homicide. Best to keep your kids away from here for a while."
I thumbed the stubble on my chin, my other hand outstretched on the wheel, and considered moving on, but my mouth had other ideas. "That right? But uh, isn't this house vacant? I mean, I don't remember no one living in it."
The short man, now tall with temper, said, "Yeah, some squatters. We think there was a dispute over some drug money. Nothing for you to worry about though, we got it under control. Now if you wouldn't mind moving along, we have a lot of work to do."
Oh, I'm sure you do, I thought, but only said, "Of course, sir, sorry for keeping you from your job." Then I rolled up the window and cruised on, keeping my eyes on the house which slowly diminished in the side-view mirror.
Luckily I had been smart enough to break down my camp and lug home all my equipment each night, so I didn't leave anything incriminating. I didn't move the furniture back, so maybe that would come back to haunt me, but considering the kind of shit going down in that house, I didn't think they would notice.
For any of you wondering about the conclusion of the house story, I went back a couple weeks later after the suits had left and the tape was taken down and confirmed that not only was the basement entirely cleaned out, but it was no longer exhibiting any strange properties. I looked for a story related to the house, maybe a made up murder of some kind, but there was nothing. That bastard lied to me and didn't even bother to cover his story up.
Now, in the aftermath of an event such as this, I really only had one of two options. I could forget it, move on, continue living life. The necklace was surely worth a fortune. I could sell it and have enough to retire, or at least hire enough people and expand my business large enough to retire within ten or so years. Or I could take all that money and invest it in my own PI business with only a single objective: finding out what those people knew, and why they were hiding it.
I think you know me well enough by now to guess which line of reasoning appealed more to me.
***
For the sake of brevity, I'm going to omit most of my encounters along the journey to discovering Area X. There's a lot to tell, and if it appeals to you perhaps I'd be willing to share at a later date, but for now I want to get this part of the story, the more proximal part, out in the open.
Three years ago, I discovered the source of what I'll call "The Receiver". This is the device that was schematized in the documents that I found in the briefcase. What it does is a complex answer, and how it does it is pretty much all speculation, but here's what I've been able to find out: this universe we live in is a node in a network of many other spaces. These spaces exist in higher dimensions that we cannot directly perceive, but using a conceivable analogy, just think about a flower with petals. The petals are these other dimensions which bleed into our world, which is at the center. However, it's not that pretty. We see the physical world through the lens of spacetime: sizes, speeds, etc. These other dimensions don't necessarily have space or time. In fact, what actually exists there, I couldn't say. The only data I have on them is from two sources: correspondence information and server data from the secret agency (which I'll call "the Organization") that keeps this under wraps, and first-hand experience with realms from these other entities, either directly (I experience it) or through the eyes of someone else with the same or greater abilities than I possess.
I referred to these people with abilities earlier as "Antennas", and I will continue to use the term. Antennas really come in three flavors, marked by the strength of their ability: weak Antennas, like me, are able to observe spontaneous interactions between our universe and other dimensions (phase shifts) when there is a strong force of collision like existed in the basement; moderate Antennas may see phase shifts occur at any point, and they usually are able to retain memories from across the different transformations; strong Antennas, and I don't know if they exist yet, but they are able to consciously interact with these other realms and cause phase shifts to occur.
I mentioned that moderate Antennas are able to retain memories from before and after a phase shift. Technically, all Antennas have this ability, but it's about degree. I can recall only very specific instances and without much detail. Moderates are usually able to pick out much more nuanced minutiae. At the lower end of moderate scale, most of those details fade or get fuzzy over time, but for the very strong Antennas, they hold onto almost everything. One other property that scales with strength is interaction with other conscious entities. Only a small percentage of moderates are able to do this. What's interesting is that these entities can possess (yes, like ghosts) people who aren't even antennas, but no one is aware of such possession at this deep of a level. I have several companions now, and only two have had interactions with these otherworldly beings. Not all of them are malevolent, some of them are whimsical or kind, but there are a fair share of demons out there.
Getting back to the point, Area X started as a government funded project in the 70's. At that time, they were focused on a few subjects: Artificial Intelligence, DNA sequencing, and psychedelics. Yes, they were part of the infamous LSD experiments. But they looked at these subjects through a common lens—there was something that the burgeoning tech industry, fueled by the advent of a commercial computer market, was missing. As the tech giants rose in the early 2000's and began to collect mass amounts of data, this other agency was decades ahead in a different metric, although it was completely (and still is) hidden from the public. Their efforts to understand psychedelic experiences led to a formalized method of understanding interactions between multiple realities. They built certain scanning equipment to detect anomalies like the one I found in the basement; although their tools were much more sophisticated and didn't utilize voltage readings. Then they ran tests in these areas. One area in particular is a hot-bed of phase shift interactions. That's where Area X is located (and the Receiver).
The Receiver is a giant electromagnetic orb that has trapped the kind of multi-dimensional energy that causes the phase shifts; since the Organization seized control of the lab, it's effectively become a map of the Earth in relation to these other worlds. For the past twenty or so years, the Organization has been studying this map, using the data big Tech companies have collected to essentially develop a Rosetta Stone for interpreting the meaning of the fluctuations in their scanning equipment. Recently, the public, though going the long way round, was actually pretty close to a breakthrough in this same department until recently when ultra-powerful LLMs surfaced, and the whole world began going down what I'd argue is the wrong rabbit hole of language processing. But I digress.
Area X is essentially a private military base built for defending the most impactful piece of technology ever invented. With the Receiver, the Organization now has the power to essentially predict any and all future outcomes, the only thing holding them back is the limitations of their own scanning equipment which will get better with time. To put it into perspective, the Organization has access to a kind of data allocation tool which in one day can produce over ten thousand times that the Big Data companies combined would be able to filter through in the next decade. You might think, then, that the problem is merely asymmetric power, and that is certainly a concern, but it isn't the main concern. The main issue is that this organization is actively recruiting (and kidnapping) Antennas from around the world in an effort to find or make one of them into a strong Antenna. In other words, they want a subject who is able not only to see the future, but to manipulate it at will.
balance to the world. I've been working on amassing resources, capital, and building my own team, and now I'm ready. You might ask why I'm posting this here. Wouldn't it be better to keep all this secret? Well, yes, it would be. But that's the problem. Nothing is secret anymore. They know about me and the others, and if I don't make a move, they will. In a way, this is a letter directly to the organization that I know, and I'm coming.
In a different way, I wanted to release this information to the public. There are lots of people out there waking up and realizing that the world they experience is not the one others experience. If you think you might be an Antenna, don't be afraid—you have a special gift that can be controlled. If you want more details on how to control it, or if you're interested in my mission, don't be afraid to reach out. This hasn't always been my life's work, but it is now.
At least until I die.
submitted by Weathers_Writing to nosleep [link] [comments]


2024.05.16 21:57 hoggersbridge Engines of Arachnea: The Bug World (Chapter 20: The God Speaks)

Link for all the chapters available here: Engines of Arachnea on Royal Road
Deep in the groaning halls of sinew and bone he awaited his audience with the god. At a wave of his hand the ribs which held up the ceiling contracted, tendons shifting within the pink walls of the chamber as the jagged, calcareous spurs that composed the doorway sank back into the spongy masses of tissue, revealing a passage curving down and out of sight.
Menash stood before the yawning portal and considered eternity. This was no an idle thought: here in the Dawning Chamber, the concept was very real. His father, Yulan, had stood in this exact spot times beyond count. When he was struck down in his prime by the Night Weaver and her Leaper offspring, torn limb from limb as he fought to defend Chthonis from a raiding party, Menash’s uncle, Aqavarr, had carried his broken remains over that grinning threshold to join the hosts of the dead, never to return.
A hot and heavy exhalation rattled up out of the depths, wafting in the acrid scent of the bonding pools and the wet slithering sound of the rebirthing canals. Menash felt a crackle of static in the corners of his mind before the signal sharpened and he heard It whisper distinctly:
“Enter…”
The familiar dread crept its way up the small of his back, and he gave a little shiver. No matter how many times he had communed with the Vitalus, he’d never been able to shake the feeling of his utter insignificance. But he persevered, walking bravely down the slurping passage, past the rows of broad antechambers lining either side of the hallway. Each one held a slumbering shape immersed in a cryogenic bath, towering hulks of muscle encased in ribbed and riveted plates of chitin. No two were alike in size or physiology, but all seemed to emanate the same primeval aura of dread that tickled Menash’s fight-or-flight-instinct, skewing it very much towards the latter response. These were the Hollowores, soulless avatars of the Vitalus, each one a tool capable of eradicating an entire species. As Menash approached, one of the living weapons stirred to life. A pronged, anvil-shaped head emerged from the bath, umbilical feeder tubes detaching from its armored flanks as the rest of its bulk followed, its mauve exoskeleton as sleek and shiny as amethyst. The Hollowore extended legs as thick as grown pine trees and lifted itself above him, its pairs of crushing pincers dripping amniotic fluids as it herded him towards the central room.
Bundles of white gossamer filaments spread all across the floor, encircling steaming pools of pus and acid. He saw arms and legs, sensory organs and entire exoskeletons being knitted before his very eyes, the amino acid chains being stitched on a layer at a time, the weeping pus evidence of microphages fighting off possible infections as the Vitalus did Its work.
These were the next generation of exomorphs, yet to be assigned to their hosts. It was here that Vitalus constantly improved the only thing that could ensure the continued survival of Menash’s subspecies. Exomorphs were bonded to Gallivants at birth, the organisms supplying their hosts with the means to breathe an atmosphere they was never meant to endure, and the strength to fight in a world that was red in tooth and claw. They were as swift as the summer wind and could multiply their host’s muscular power by up to twelve times their natural output.
But for all their God-given might, Gallivants were still mortal. They could and often did perish in the endless struggle for existence that the Vitalus called the Great Game. But even in death they could still commit their essence to posterity, passing down their defining traits through the malleable genetic code of the gilt helix. It was the Vitalus’ greatest boon; through the gilt helix a single individual could become a progenitor of an entire generation, becoming at one stroke the father of whole nations and peoples.
One day he too would prove worthy of the honor that Yulan had earned with his life. But he was not alone in that ambition. Menash was annoyed to find the crimson-clad Vezda and the cowardly Racek waiting for him inside, standing next to a large ball of filaments that hung from a tonsil-like growth hanging from the walls.
This node pulsed, emitting a small storm of bioelectric activity, networks of fungi conveying commands in the form of oscillating voltages to their communities of symbiotic bacteria, the latter containing greigite mineral crystals aligned in the shape of electromagnetic coils. Other networks hidden in the walls modulated and amplified the signals, and the three Gallivants steeled themselves for the onrushing flood of information as the Vitalus tapped into their minds.
He was a candle before the raging heart of the thunderstorm. For an instant Menash touched a fraction of Its intelligence, the divisions of time and space rolling back as they joined the ocean of shared consciousness, becoming one with the living systems of Arachnea. From the tiniest aeroplankton floating above the waves of the golden coastlines, to the herds of ultrapods munching their way through swathes of trees in the savannahs. Menash felt himself pushing up out of the soil, longing and lusting and reaching for the sunlight with a trillion green fingers uncurling, alive with the furious movement of life.
But what was that flicker of orange to the east? That searing heat, that prickling pain spreading like a cancer down his side?
The Vitalus scooped them up and hurled them headlong into hell itself. A roaring wildfire was sweeping into the heart of the eastern rainforests. Menash tasted ash and ruin, felt pieces of himself wither and burn, his branches tongues of fire, wood cracking from the intense blaze, sap boiling instantaneously upon contact and rupturing, splitting him right down the grain. He fled in terror, running, slithering, digging, swimming, flying away in crazed panic from the walls of red death closing in on him. As his skin flaked off in clumps of charcoal he looked back and saw it towering over the treetops, the epicenter of this howling vortex of destruction: the grey behemoth. Its burnished metal hide gleamed like copper, reflecting the fury of the conflagration burning well into the night.
Menash pulled his mind away before it was lost forever in the storm of electric potentials. He saw Racek and Vezda swaying on their feet, breathing hard and fast.
“Heart of the World,” he managed to gasp, “What is your bidding?”
The Hollowore maneuvered itself until it was facing him directly. Tiny beady eyes fixed him in their blank gaze. The node emitted a blue pulse and the creature shuddered as it received the signal. It opened a maw powerful enough to chew boulders into gravel and rumbled:
“This one is the alpha which survived first contact with anomalous variable. It will tell Us what occurred, and from whence this threat emerged.”
“It came from the karst mountain range, where the yellowjacket Amit live,” Menash replied, “It was destroying the largest mound in that area, massacring its inhabitants. It brought the mountain down on them—we’ve never seen anything like it. Zildiz was the first on the scene. She warned us not to approach, and that it was dangerous, but some of us,” here he cast an angry look at Vezda, “Some of us went ahead and tried to scavenge from the bodies of the dying. Then the behemoth ignited the air and burned scores of us to cinders.”
“Irrational. Why did you do this?”
“W-we thought that you had spawned the grey behemoth,” Menash stammered, embarrassed to say the least, “That it was the newest addition to the Great Game, another species of ultrafauna that would help perfect Arachnea.”
“Not so. It was made by an evil far older than the All-In-One,” replied the Vitalus, “It is called a Divine Engine. In cycles past, this evil sought to undo this world and all that inhabit it. In that, it almost succeeded.”
Menash felt his blood run cold at those words.
“Is it the only one of its kind?” Racek piped up. Menash and Vezda both bristled at his interruption; subordinates were only supposed to speak when spoken to.
“There were several deployed here in Our infancy. We had thought them all destroyed in the War of Creation.”
“Your Munificence,” Racek went on, heedless of the venomous looks he was getting from the other two, “Most of us survived because Zildiz persuaded us to dive into the river. She saved all our lives! But as I washed up on the riverbank, I saw the behemoth casting a seedpod into the skies. I did not see where it landed, but it was travelling in a high arc due east. Is this the behemoth’s method of reproducing? If so, then how many offspring can it generate from this one seed?”
The Vitalus met his questions with a minute of silence. Menash had never known It to take so long to respond to a query, and felt another stab of unease in his gut. Unless he was imagining things, the Vitalus seemed genuinely disturbed by the scenario that Racek has raised, enough to convince Menash that the danger was far from hypothetical.
“That is a distant possibility,” It said somewhat cryptically, “Regardless, We cannot allow the Engine’s continued existence.”
“Then it must be destroyed,” Vezda said, her barbed tail eagerly perking up.
“We are not certain that it can be,” the Vitalus said, and Menash heard Racek audibly gulp at the admission.
“But Your Omniscience, you alone are the arbiter of growth and decay,” Vezda said in disbelief, “Surely you can unmake this monster as well?”
“Perhaps. The Divine Engines were built to withstand the extremes of temperature, gravity, atmospheric pressure, acidity and irradiation found on semi-inhabitable exoplanets. Worlds of bareness and desolation, glassed by thermonuclear bombardment or infested with alien microorganisms. In the wars of Our youth, the Betrayers used tungsten-alloy warheads fired from space platforms to crack their bulkheads. Not even Our vessels, the Hollowores, could damage them in any significant way. We will need time to gather the raw materials and fabricate the weapons needed to end this threat.”
“What must we do?” Menash asked.
“If this variable is not dealt with, it could upset the delicate balance We have sacrificed so much to achieve. Already the wildfire it has caused will release close to 400 million metric tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere and destroy 2.3 million acres of forest before Our countermeasures can stop it. Time is our limiting factor. If the Engine cannot be destroyed now, it must be restrained.”
“It hasn’t moved an inch since we last saw it,” Vezda said brightly, “Maybe it has already died?”
“Yes, and maybe your mother was a horka toad,” Racek said snidely. Vezda scowled and took a step towards him, then stopped as she remembered that she trod on hallowed ground.
“Not so. It has merely gone dormant. Having expended its fuel, it is now running on the bare minimum of its reserves. My children, you must ensure that it does not wake again. Establish a quarantine zone around the Engine and let none approach, on pain of death. The Leaper kindreds will secure the ground while the Gallivants patrol the skies.”
Vezda and Menash exchanged troubled looks. Nobody wanted Leapers establishing a foothold in what was essentially a buffer zone between their subspecies. Once allowed to settle in a habitat, it would not take long for them to adapt and become masters of their new territory. Ousting them would become a battle of attrition, and given the lower birthrates of Gallivants, it was not one they could long afford.
“Respectfully, we do not require assistance from our brother kindred,” Menash ventured, “We are more than capable of safeguarding the area ourselves.”
The node throbbed again, the bioelectric flashes taking on an angry purple hue. With a sound like the grinding of a millstone the Hollowore clashed its claws together impatiently. All three of the mortals took a hasty step back.
“The alpha will obey, or another will be found that can,” the Vitalus growled at them, “All subspecies will observe a general truce during this period. This is a temporary addition to the Great Game. Those that serve Us well shall be rewarded. We shall also enlist the aid of your terrestrial cousins, as well as the Cataphract clans to replenish the soil, and lone Saints who shall rove beyond the quarantine zone.”
Menash’s unease deepened. The Vitalus was bringing together four different kindreds, some of which killed each other on sight, in a move that reeked of desperation. The kindreds had worked together before, of course, on complex projects such as altering rainfall patterns and husbanding struggling species, but never so many at once. This was bound to end in bloodshed.
“Those that break the truce shall be chemically neutered, and their gilt helix purged from the existing gene pool,” the Vitalus continued, “You will maintain this quarantine until We have dealt with the Engine.”
“It is understood!” Menash and Vezda said at once.
“But what about Zildiz?” Racek blurted out, again risking his entire lineage by speaking out of turn, “She might still be alive out there!”
“He’s right,” Menash found himself agreeing despite his dislike for Racek, “She’s our alpha, after all. It would be a shame to lose her helix. Do we have your leave to send out a party to recover her?”
The Vitalus pondered the request for a moment, then crushed his hopes when it said:
“Regrettable, the loss of the female. Valuable stock for the breeding program. But it has not responded to Our signals—it is unlikely to have survived. The female Vezda shall take up its duties as alpha.”
“But Your Benevolence—” both men cried out in unison.
“It is decided. She has risked the Great Game, and must abide by its outcome. To speak more on this would risk Our displeasure,” the god warned.
“We can’t spare the manpower anyway,” Vezda pointed out, trying not to look too pleased at Its decision. She darted a quick look at Menash, long enough for him to see the selfish desire festering in her heart. He turned away from her in disgust, baring his blades by the slightest of margins to let her know what he thought of her, then asked the Vitalus:
“But what of the Engine’s seedpod? Should we search for it?”
“Negative!” the Vitalus boomed, its node reinforcing the word with a spike of activity that sent needles of pain spearing into their heads, “We shall complete this task. It is dangerous and can be entrusted to no other.”
The Hollowore angled its massive head towards the cavernous ceiling, armored flaps on its back sliding aside as it unfurled sets of rigid sixty-meter wings. A wide sphincter on the roof gaped open and Menash saw the evening sky awash with the stars in their milky multitudes. The Hollowore took a deep breath through the spiracles lining its thorax and abdomen, pumping air through a pair of hollow tube-like protuberances under either of its wings. Menash and the others quickly scampered to a safe distance. Seconds later there was a scream of chemical combustion and the Hollowore rose into the evening skies, leaving behind a long trail of superheated gases, the backwash almost knocking Menash off his feet. They watched as the Hollowore gained altitude, making straight for the columns of billowing smoke on the horizon, a sweeping shadow blotting out the light of the heavens.
The Vitalus’ mental presence receded with it. When it did not return, they took it to mean that they were dismissed and likewise took flight and headed for Chthonis. They were hardly out of the Dawning Chamber when Vezda seized the scrawny Racek by his wings and anchored her feet right up against his back.
“Funny little man, are you? Crack jokes at my expense again, and I’ll see to it that you’ll never fly again!” she snarled, yanking hard. Racek yelled as his wings threatened to pop out of their sockets.
“Stop!” Menash said, ramming his shoulder into her and knocking the smaller male out of her grip. Vezda rounded on him, blades out and her tail aquiver with rage.
“As for you! No one should speak to the Vitalus like that!” she shrieked, “Much less gainsay It! Are you trying to get us all killed? It is the source and continuance of life itself—”
“But the Vitalus doesn’t always consider the individual scale of things,” Menash reasoned, controlling his rising anger as he tried to defuse the situation, “Its scope of thought is beyond ours. Therefore it is up to us to look after each other. None of us can win the Great Game alone. We need people like Zildiz for the species to prosper.”
“Your logic is flawed,” Vezda spat, “Empathy is a sham devised by the selfish action of the gene, which seeks only to preserve itself. At least I am honest enough to look after my own interests. Your obsession with that whore is misplaced. Heed my words, Menash. What happened today marks a change in the Great Game. Only the ruthless will reap the rewards of this era. Think on that, and act accordingly.”
The female darted off in another direction, leaving the two behind.
“Thanks,” Racek said, rubbing at his sore shoulders, “My, my. She’s really taking her promotion very seriously, isn’t she?”
“This doesn’t make us friends,” Menash said shortly, “We share a common interest, that’s all.”
The two flew together in silence for a time, the dark canopy unrolling below their feet. Racek had always been a bitter rival for Zildiz’s affections. In the mating seasons he and Menash had flown the damsel-dance against each other countless times, racing and dogfighting at top speed through the dense bamboo thickets in an effort to impress her.
But each time she had always chosen Menash. Naturally. He was the stronger, the braver, the son of the Scourge who had slain hundreds on his lightning raids into Leaper territory. Their pairings had been brief and passionate, yet she had always laughed at the end and gone on her merry way, a rose petal borne on a scented breeze, the dalliance as meaningless to her as other concerns like eating or breathing.
But not to him. Right now, all that mattered was her. And Racek was the only one in the whole wide world who knew exactly how he felt. Did that mean he could be trusted? Menash considered the enormity of what he was about to do, and wavered. Then he saw her face in the darkness of his home, the face she wore when they were all alone together, and he took a deep breath before breaking the silence, saying:
“I’ll be in charge of the quarantine. I can arrange for you to disappear for a few days. I can have one of the younglings mimic your magnetosynaptic signal, make it seem like you’re with the rest of us.”
“You’d do that? For me?” Racek said in astonishment.
“Hah. Not for you,” Menash laughed softly. He looked Racek straight in the eyes and continued: “What’ll it be, then?”
If he so much as hesitates, I’ll have to kill him here and now, Menash told himself.
“Why, yes. Yes, of course!” the little brown male said vigorously.
“Good,” Menash sighed with relief, “She’ll be very grateful to whoever brings her home. I’d do it myself, but as an alpha I can’t risk being seen as disobedient.”
“Then why give me this chance? After all that’s passed between us?”
“I should have thought that was obvious,” Menash replied. Racek digested that for a bit, then out of nowhere said:
“If I find her—when I find her—I’ll tell her exactly who it was that sent me.”
“That won’t be necessary.”
“Bah! Just so we’re even, that’s all,” Racek grinned, his mouthparts slanting askew.
“Thanks, I guess. I’d…I’d appreciate that. You do understand what we’re risking here, right?”
“Sure. We’ll be total genetic write-offs if we’re caught. But it’s not like I wanted to see tiny ugly Raceks running around the house anyway. What about you, though? Why are you putting your neck on the chopping block?”
“You know why,” Menash said quietly, his thoughts still lingering on her face.
“Yes,” Racek agreed with a wistful air, “Yes, I suppose I do.”
And the pair spoke no more until they reached Chthonis.
Link for all the chapters available here: Engines of Arachnea on Royal Road
submitted by hoggersbridge to HFY [link] [comments]


2024.05.16 21:35 prashantyadav0308200 What is Tox ?

What is Tox ?
Tox is a command-line tool that automates and standardizes testing in Python projects. It is designed to simplify the process of packaging, testing, and releasing Python software by providing a consistent and reproducible testing environment across different Python versions, interpreters, and dependency configurations.
Key Features of Tox
Virtual Environment Management: Tox creates and manages isolated virtual environments for each test configuration, ensuring that dependencies and settings are isolated and do not interfere with other environments or the system's Python installation.
Cross-Python Compatibility: Tox supports testing your code against multiple Python versions and implementations, including CPython, PyPy, Jython, and more. This helps ensure that your code works correctly across different Python environments.
Dependency Management: Tox can automatically install project dependencies and test dependencies in each virtual environment, making it easier to manage and reproduce the testing environment.
Test Runner Integration: Tox is test runner agnostic, meaning it can run tests with various testing frameworks like pytest, unittest, nose, and others, providing a consistent interface for executing tests.
Continuous Integration Support: Tox can be easily integrated with Continuous Integration (CI) servers like Jenkins, Travis CI, and GitHub Actions, reducing boilerplate code and simplifying the testing process in CI pipelines.
Customizable Environments: Tox allows you to define custom environments for specific tasks, such as linting, code formatting, documentation generation, or any other command-line tool you need to run as part of your development workflow.
Parallel Testing: Tox can run tests in parallel across multiple environments, potentially speeding up the testing process.
How Tox Works
Tox follows a general workflow when executing tests:
Configuration: Tox reads the configuration from a tox.ini file (or other supported formats like pyproject.toml or setup.cfg) and merges it with command-line options and environment variables.
Packaging (optional): If your project has a setup.py file, Tox can create a source distribution of your package using python setup.py sdist.
Environment Creation: For each defined test environment (e.g., py27, py36), Tox creates a fresh virtual environment using the specified Python version and interpreter.
Dependency Installation: Tox installs the project dependencies and test dependencies specified in the configuration into each virtual environment.
Command Execution: Tox runs the specified commands (e.g., test runners, linters, formatters) in each virtual environment and reports the results.
Basic Tox Configuration
Here's a basic example of a tox.ini file:
ini
[tox]
envlist = py37,py38
[testenv]
deps =
pytest
commands =
pytest tests/
In this configuration:
envlist specifies the test environments to create (py37 for Python 3.7 and py38 for Python 3.8).
deps lists the dependencies to install in each environment (in this case, pytest).
commands defines the commands to run in each environment (running pytest on the tests/ directory).
To run the tests with Tox, you simply execute the tox command in your project directory.
Advanced Tox Features
While the basic configuration covers many use cases, Tox offers advanced features and customization options:
Environment Variables: Tox allows you to set environment variables for specific environments or globally.
Conditional Settings: You can use factor expressions to conditionally apply settings based on the environment or other factors.
Parallel Execution: Tox supports running tests in parallel across multiple environments using the -p or --parallel option.
Plugins: Tox can be extended with plugins to add new functionality or integrate with other tools.
Generative Environments: Tox supports generating environments dynamically based on certain conditions or external data sources.
Continuous Integration with Tox
Tox integrates seamlessly with Continuous Integration (CI) systems like GitHub Actions, Travis CI, and Jenkins. Here's an example of a GitHub Actions workflow that runs Tox:
yaml
name: Python Tests
on: [push]
jobs:
build:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
strategy:
matrix:
python-version: [3.7, 3.8, 3.9]
steps:
  • uses: actions/checkout@v2
  • name: Set up Python ${{ matrix.python-version }}
uses: actions/setup-python@v2
with:
python-version: ${{ matrix.python-version }}
  • name: Install dependencies
run:
python -m pip install --upgrade pip
pip install tox
  • name: Run Tox
run: tox -e py
Tox woks
This workflow runs Tox for Python versions 3.7, 3.8, and 3.9, ensuring that your tests pass across multiple Python versions in a clean CI environment.
Conclusion
Tox is a powerful tool that simplifies and standardizes the testing process in Python projects. By providing a consistent and reproducible testing environment, managing dependencies, and integrating with various test runners and CI systems, Tox helps ensure that your code works correctly across different Python versions and configurations. Whether you're working on a small project or a large-scale application, Tox can streamline your development workflow and improve the quality of your Python code.
submitted by prashantyadav0308200 to u/prashantyadav0308200 [link] [comments]


http://rodzice.org/