Yes, frogs are omnivores. As tadpoles, they primarily eat algae and plant matter, making them herbivores. However, as they mature into adults, their diet shifts to include a variety of small animals such as insects, worms, and even smaller amphibians, making them carnivorous. This dual diet throughout their lifecycle qualifies frogs as omnivores.

berseem clover balady A Versatile and Producer-Friendly Forage Option

Introduction:
Trifolium alexandrinum, commonly known as berseem clover, offers a multitude of benefits as a forage crop. Among its various cultivars, Balady berseem clover stands out for its exceptional adaptability and suitability for grazing applications. This technical document explores the key characteristics and advantages of Balady berseem clover, making it a compelling choice for livestock producers.
Key Distinctions of Balady Berseem Clover:

• Enhanced Climatic Tolerance: Balady berseem clover exhibits a broader range of climatic adaptability compared to other berseem clover varieties. It demonstrates a higher tolerance for moderately warm temperatures, flourishing in both fall and spring planting seasons (depending on the specific regional climate). This characteristic expands its suitability for cultivation across diverse geographical locations.
• Focus on Grazing Applications: Balady berseem clover is particularly well-suited for use as cattle forage. It maintains a consistently high level of palatability and digestibility throughout its growth stages, ensuring efficient feed intake and utilization by livestock. Furthermore, unlike some legumes, Balady berseem clover consumption does not carry the risk of bloat in cattle. This eliminates a potential health concern and positions it as a safe and nutritious grazing option.

Summary of Balady Berseem Clover Advantages:

Feature	Description
Variety	Balady
Scientific Name	Trifolium alexandrinum
Adaptation	Wider range of climates, tolerates moderate warmth
Planting Seasons	Fall or spring (depending on regional climate)
Primary Use Case	Grazing by cattle
Grazing Benefits	High palatability, digestibility, bloat-safe for cattle

Additional Considerations for Successful Implementation:

• Seed Inoculation: For optimal nitrogen fixation within the soil, it is highly recommended to inoculate Balady berseem clover seeds with a specialized bacterial culture specifically formulated for berseem clover and crimson clover.
• Management Practices: As a cool-season annual, Balady berseem clover completes its lifecycle within a year. To ensure a continuous grazing source, consider planting multiple sections at strategically chosen times throughout the year. This staggered planting approach allows for a consistent supply of high-quality forage for your livestock.

Conclusion:
Balady berseem clover offers a compelling solution for livestock producers seeking a reliable, adaptable, and bloat-safe forage crop. Its broader climatic tolerance, extended planting window, and suitability for grazing applications make it a valuable addition to any livestock operation. By incorporating Balady berseem clover into your existing forage management strategy, you can potentially enhance the nutritional value of your cattle's diet, promote efficient feed utilization, and contribute to the overall health and productivity of your herd.

The world of coffee is on the cusp of a revolution, driven by concerns about the environmental impact and sustainability of traditional coffee production. Several startups are working on creating coffee without using coffee beans, instead relying on lab-grown techniques or molecular reconstruction of coffee's key compounds. This emerging trend is not only changing the way we think about coffee but also addressing the environmental toll of the coffee industry.
The Environmental Impact of Traditional Coffee Production
The coffee industry is one of the most polluting crops in the value chain, with rising global demand driving deforestation in developing countries and climate change threatening the amount of land suitable for coffee cultivation. By 2050, half of current coffee-growing land could become unproductive[1]. The traditional coffee production process also requires a significant amount of water, with 140 liters of water needed to make just one cup of coffee[5].
The Rise of Synthetic Coffee
Startups like Atomo Coffee, Compound Foods, and Stem are leading the charge in creating synthetic coffee. Atomo Coffee, based in Seattle, has analyzed over 1,000 compounds found in coffee and used a proprietary process to create a molecular coffee by extracting and reassembling those compounds from more sustainable, upcycled plant-based materials[1]. They claim their beanless coffee generates 93% fewer carbon emissions and uses 94% less water than conventional coffee[1].
Compound Foods, based in San Francisco, is using synthetic biology to recreate coffee without beans, examining what makes coffee unique at the molecular level and then correlating the key flavors and aromas[2]. Their preliminary lifecycle analysis indicates their product has 1/10th the greenhouse gas emissions and water usage of traditional coffee[2].
Lab-Grown Coffee: A Game-Changer
Researchers at the VTT Technical Research Centre in Finland have successfully lab-grown coffee from cell cultures in bioreactors[6]. This method requires no pesticides and much less water than conventional farming. While still in the early stages, they anticipate potential regulatory approval in Europe and the US within about four years[6].
The Socioeconomic Implications
While synthetic coffee holds promise for reducing coffee's environmental footprint, it also raises important questions about its impact on the livelihoods of traditional coffee farmers and workers, particularly in developing nations heavily reliant on the coffee economy[1]. Some startups aim to support farmers' transition to more sustainable practices in parallel with their work[5].
Consumer Acceptance and Scalability
Consumer acceptance of beanless coffee remains to be seen, with one survey indicating most people would not drink it[1]. However, scalability is not considered a major hurdle, with political challenges, regulations, and general acceptance of the technology being key factors in synthetic coffee's future[1].
The emergence of synthetic coffeereflects the food tech industry's efforts to reimagine a more sustainable future for one of the world's most popular beverages. While it holds promise for reducing coffee's environmental footprint, it will need to thoughtfully address the socioeconomic implications for traditional coffee-growing regions as it scales up. As the industry continues to evolve, one thing is clear: the future of coffee is changing, and synthetic coffee is leading the way.

Let's have a heart-to-heart about the footprint of our footwear – and no, I'm not talking about the ones left on the ground! The environmental impact of footwear production is a big deal, but luckily, there are actions we can take to make a positive change.
Did you know that traditional shoe manufacturing often involves harmful chemicals, excessive water usage, and exploitation of workers? It's time to kick these practices to the curb and move towards a more sustainable future.
Choosing eco-friendly footwear is one way to reduce our carbon footprint and support brands that prioritize both the planet and its people. Look for shoes made from sustainable materials like recycled plastic, organic cotton, or plant-based alternatives. Not only do these materials minimize environmental impact, but they also drive innovation in the fashion industry.
But sustainability doesn't stop at materials – it's also about the lifecycle of the product. Seek out brands that prioritize durability, repairability, and recycling. Investing in high-quality shoes that last longer means less waste and fewer resources used up.

Hey Reddit Fashionistas,
Are you tired of compromising style for sustainability? Well, I've got some exciting news for you! Meet Karla Angel Designs, the visionary behind a brand that's revolutionizing fashion with their eco-friendly leather shoes.
In a world where fast fashion dominates, Karla Angel Designs is taking a stand for the planet. Their commitment to sustainability goes beyond just a trendy tagline – it's at the core of everything they do. From materials to manufacturing, they're redefining what it means to be stylish and eco-conscious.
So, what sets Karla Angel Designs apart? For starters, they've ditched traditional leather production methods in favor of innovative alternatives. Think plant-based or recycled materials that look and feel just like the real deal – minus the environmental guilt.
But it's not just about the materials; it's about the entire lifecycle of the product. That's why Karla Angel Designs prioritizes durability and timeless design, so you can rock their shoes for years to come. Plus, they're all about transparency and ethical practices, ensuring fair wages and safe working conditions for everyone involved.
So, whether you're a fashionista looking to make a statement or an eco-warrior on a mission, Karla Angel Designs has got you covered. Join the movement towards sustainable style and strut your stuff in their chic leather alternatives.
Ready to step into a greener future? Check out Karla Angel Designs and their eco-friendly leather shoes – because fashion should never cost the Earth.
Let's show the world that style and sustainability can go hand in hand. Who's with me?

PYRGF (ASK @ 0.38)

• PYR.TO (ASK @ 0.54)
• ASHXF (ASK @ 0.09)
• PLAN.VN (ASK @ 0.125)

Results surpass Portland Cement plus all traditional cement additive blends in pursuit of fly ash replacement in cement.
PyroGenesis Canada Inc. ( http://pyrogenesis.com ), a high-tech company that :

• designs,
• develops,
• manufactures and commercializes
• advanced plasma processes and sustainable solutions
• which are geared to reduce greenhouse gases (GHG) and address environmental pollutants,

is pleased to announce today that it has been advised by its client, Progressive Planet,

• that the latest series of compressive strength tests on its PozPyro green cement additive product
• reveal impressive results,
• posting strength comparisons significantly above the acceptable standard for similar material.
• PozPyro enhances the strength of concrete as a replacement for fly ash, which is in diminishing supply.

PozPyro, a cement alternative, is being developed in collaboration with Progressive Planet as a supplementary cementing material (SCM)

- designed to partially replace traditional Portland Cement.

Of note, Portland Cement emits substantial amounts of CO2 during its production.
PozPyro, on the other hand, is created by using a PyroGenesis plasma-based process that transforms quartz silica, a widely available material, into a SCM (PozPyro),

• without off-gassing CO2 during the production process.

This innovation comes at a time when the cement industry seeks more sustainable practices without compromising quality or performance.
“Quartz silica is one of the most abundant materials in the earth’s crust,” said P. Peter Pascali, President and CEO of PyroGenesis.
“The ability to economically convert it into PozPyro could offer a new supply of material to compensate for the diminishing supply of fly ash, a common SCM, which, by the way,

is generated by the same coal fired power plants which are being targeted for shut down in Canada by 2030.”

According to Progressive Planet’s news release today, concrete producers are looking for SCMs that

• (i) increase the compressive strength of their mix while at the same time
• (ii) lowering their carbon footprint without sacrificing workability.

WORKABILITY
The workability of cement is measured by water demand and is a measure of its ease of use in various concrete applications.
The smaller the water demand number, the better the reading.
A passing water demand number must be less than 115% of the water demand of the control mix.
The water demand for PozPyro was between 99% and 109% for all test batches and as such

• PozPyro demonstrated excellent workability.

STRENGTH ACTIVITY INDEX (SAI)

The SAI is an industry standard for measuring the compressive strength of cement mortar cubes. As announced in a press release on April 11, 2024, the results of the 7-day testing that showed an approximate average +45% SAI gain across four tests against the minimum target value.
In the 28-day tests announced today, Portland Cement was used as the control product, with varied compressive strengths between 35.26 and 39.62 megapascals (MPa) depending on the test.
These tests were conducted in two series, A and B, with two tests in each series, using different input variables to test for optimized results.

TESTING AGAINST MINIMUM COMPLIANCE (75% PORTLAND CEMENT MPA)

For SAI tests, a cement additive product test is acceptable at a minimum strength of 75% of the control product strength.
For one Series B test, the Portland Cement control achieved a compressive strength value of 36.18 MPa at 28 days.
An additive product would therefore be acceptable based on achieving 27.14 MPa (equating to 75% of the Portland Cement control strength).
The results for the individual Series B test showed a blend of Portland Cement containing 20% PozPyro far surpassed this target, achieving a peak result of 54.15 MPa

• – a result 99.56% higher than the minimum acceptable value.

The overall average gain for all tests in both series A and B was +67.43% against the minimum compliant for an acceptable cement additive product.

TESTING AGAINST MAXIMUM COMPLIANCE (100% PORTLAND CEMENT MPA)

When compared to a 100% value of Portland Cement alone, this same Series B PozPyro/Portland Cement blend test surpassed even the full-strength value of the Portland Cement control product by up to 49.67%.
The overall average gain for all tests in both series A and B was +25% against the maximum product compliance for an acceptable cement additive product.
- This result means that the PozPyro material, when added to Portland Cement at a 20%/80% blend, outperformed a cement-only Portland Cement control in strength tests by 25%.
****
“These 28-day test results confirm the impressive results achieved by the previous 7-day tests, and underscore yet again the potential transformative nature of plasma in producing materials, in both an economically and environmentally beneficial manner, that are key to heavy industry,” said P. Peter Pascali, President and CEO of PyroGenesis.
“Not only were we able to far surpass the minimum acceptable product standard compared to 75% of the control, but when compared to a full value of the control the PozPyro green cement additive showed a 49.67% gain.
- In other words, these tests suggest that not only can PozPyro potentially outperform other traditional cement additive products in strength, it has the potential to directly outperform pure cement alone.
As I’ve stated before, the cement industry is a key target for us, and we have high expectations for the PozPyro green cement additive material.”
​
**** All images are in the original PR here : https://finance.yahoo.com/news/pyrogenesis-announces-28-day-lab-110000788.html
​
Image 1: A comparison of the four individual Series A and Series B strength tests, measured at 7- and 28-days in megapascals (MPa) of a 20% PozPyro/80% Portland Cement blend against a 100% pure Portland Cement control, a 20% fly ash blend, a 20% ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBFS) blend, and a 20% silica fume blend produced using traditional methods.
Steve Harpur, CEO of Progressive Planet, commented on the results over the last month during which Progressive Planet prepared four separate batches of cement mortar cubes to test, under the American Society for Testing and Materials (“ASTM”) testing protocol, at both 7 and 28 days for compressive strength: “These results were exceptional and provide us the technical confidence to take the next steps to bring this product to market. In the Pacific Northwest alone, over one million tons of fly ash will cease to be generated by the summer of 2025 at which time two massive thermal coal to energy facilities will have finished converting from burning coal to natural gas.”
​
**** All images are in the original PR here : https://finance.yahoo.com/news/pyrogenesis-announces-28-day-lab-110000788.html
​
Image 2: A comparison of the Series A and Series B strength tests, measured at 7- and 28-days in megapascals (MPa) of a 20% PozPyro/80% Portland Cement blend, using averages of each of two tests within both Series A and Series B, against 100% pure Portland Cement control, 20% fly ash blend, 20% ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBFS) blend, and 20% silica fume blend.

CO2 EMISSIONS / LACK THEREOF

While compressive strength is key to overall product viability, the reduction of CO2 emissions achieved by using PyroGenesis’ plasma technology, a low carbon emitting process, has the potential to offer further “green” benefits.
CO2 emissions within a product lifecycle are defined globally within 3 categories: Scope 1, Scope 2, and Scope.
Generally speaking:

• Scope 1 emissions are direct greenhouse gas emissions caused by the company’s production processes.
• Scope 2 emissions are indirect emissions, that factors in the use of energy purchased externally (and the CO2 created as a result of that energy being originally produced).
• Scope 3 emissions represent the CO2 emissions from operations upstream and downstream of the company’s operations, such as raw material production, transportation, waste, and end of life remediation.

When compared to other traditional cement additives, the production of PozPyro may result in dramatically lower CO2 emissions.
For the purposes of the graph below, Scope 2 emissions regarding electricity usage have been factored into PozPyro’s emission level.
Without these Scope 2 emissions, the greenhouse gas emissions released during the production of PozPyro may be virtually zero.
​
**** All images are in the original PR here : https://finance.yahoo.com/news/pyrogenesis-announces-28-day-lab-110000788.html
​
Image 3: A comparison of CO2 emitted during the production of 1 tonne of PozPyro vs. other cement additive products.
CO2 emission assigned to PozPyro comes from production of electricity subsequently used by the process, not from the process itself.
“These are the best results we have ever seen in an alternative cementing material.
The fact that silica-based cements do not off gas CO2 is an additional bonus to the exceptional compressive strength results,” added Steve Gurney, President of Progressive Planet.
​
**** All images are in the original PR here : https://finance.yahoo.com/news/pyrogenesis-announces-28-day-lab-110000788.html
Image 4: A zero-CO2, energy-efficient conversion of crystalline quartz to amorphous silica through PyroGenesis’ plasma process.

POTENTIAL ADRESSABLE MARKET

According to Progressive Planet’s press release of today, it was noted that the North American cement market size reached 194.2 million US tons in 2023, and they expect that it will reach 279.8 million tons by 2032, reflecting an annual growth rate of 4% between 2024 and 2032.
Assuming that pozzolanic cements could be a substitute for 20% of Portland Cement, the total addressable North American market is projected to reach over 55 million tons by 2032.
At a projected price of US$200 per ton by 2032, the potential market is over $11 billion USD per annum by that time.

NEXT STEPS: PILOT PLANT

Now that the compressive strength of PozPyro has been validated, the next critical step is to progress towards the Pilot Plant stage. In preparation for this phase, an engineering feasibility study will be conducted over the next several months.
This comprehensive study will focus on quantifying various critical elements to ensure the economic viability of the pilot plant operations.
Key considerations will include maximizing heat recovery and other efficiency metrics, which are essential for sustainable and cost-effective production.
We are committed to rigorous evaluation and optimization processes, aiming to address all technical and economic aspects of the pilot plant.
Updates on our progress and findings from the feasibility study will be provided in due course, as we move closer to achieving a fully operational pilot plant that meets our high standards for innovation and efficiency.
PyroGenesis’ involvement in developing PozPyro from quartz is part of PyroGenesis’ three-tiered solution ecosystem that aligns with economic drivers that are key to global heavy industry.
PozPyro is part of PyroGenesis’ Commodity Security & Optimization tier, where the recovery of viable metals and the optimization of production to increase output helps to maximize raw materials and improve the availability of critical minerals.

About PyroGenesis Canada Inc.

PyroGenesis Canada Inc., a high-tech company, is a proud leader in the design, development, manufacture and commercialization of advanced plasma processes and sustainable solutions which reduce greenhouse gases (GHG) and are economically attractive alternatives to conventional “dirty” processes.
PyroGenesis has created proprietary, patented and advanced plasma technologies that are being vetted and adopted by multiple multibillion dollar industry leaders in four massive markets: iron ore pelletization, aluminum, waste management, and additive manufacturing.
With a team of experienced engineers, scientists and technicians working out of its Montreal office, and its 3,800 m2 and 2,940 m2 manufacturing facilities, PyroGenesis maintains its competitive advantage by remaining at the forefront of technology development and commercialization.
The operations are ISO 9001:2015 and AS9100D certified, having been ISO certified since 1997.
For more information, please visit: www.pyrogenesis.com.

About Progressive Planet

https://progressiveplanet.com
Progressive Planet is a CleanTech and manufacturing company with proven product lines based in Kamloops, British Columbia.
The company’s expertise lies in developing critical low-carbon and carbon sequestering solutions using our owned mineral assets and recycled materials to create planet-friendly products that fight climate change and protect our planet's health.

Progressive Planet products are in 10,000+ retail stores across North America.

Progressive Planet’s innovations, created at their C-Quester™ Centre of Sustainable Innovation, bring positive disruption to the cement, agricultural and animal-care sectors.
​

PYRGF (ASK @ 0.38)

• ASHXF (ASK @ 0.09)

Results surpass Portland Cement plus all traditional cement additive blends in pursuit of fly ash replacement in cement.
PyroGenesis Canada Inc. ( http://pyrogenesis.com ), a high-tech company that :

• designs,
• develops,
• manufactures and commercializes
• advanced plasma processes and sustainable solutions
• which are geared to reduce greenhouse gases (GHG) and address environmental pollutants,

is pleased to announce today that it has been advised by its client, Progressive Planet,

• that the latest series of compressive strength tests on its PozPyro green cement additive product
• reveal impressive results,
• posting strength comparisons significantly above the acceptable standard for similar material.
• PozPyro enhances the strength of concrete as a replacement for fly ash, which is in diminishing supply.

PozPyro, a cement alternative, is being developed in collaboration with Progressive Planet as a supplementary cementing material (SCM)

- designed to partially replace traditional Portland Cement.

Of note, Portland Cement emits substantial amounts of CO2 during its production.
PozPyro, on the other hand, is created by using a PyroGenesis plasma-based process that transforms quartz silica, a widely available material, into a SCM (PozPyro),

• without off-gassing CO2 during the production process.

This innovation comes at a time when the cement industry seeks more sustainable practices without compromising quality or performance.
“Quartz silica is one of the most abundant materials in the earth’s crust,” said P. Peter Pascali, President and CEO of PyroGenesis.
“The ability to economically convert it into PozPyro could offer a new supply of material to compensate for the diminishing supply of fly ash, a common SCM, which, by the way,

is generated by the same coal fired power plants which are being targeted for shut down in Canada by 2030.”

According to Progressive Planet’s news release today, concrete producers are looking for SCMs that

• (i) increase the compressive strength of their mix while at the same time
• (ii) lowering their carbon footprint without sacrificing workability.

WORKABILITY
The workability of cement is measured by water demand and is a measure of its ease of use in various concrete applications.
The smaller the water demand number, the better the reading.
A passing water demand number must be less than 115% of the water demand of the control mix.
The water demand for PozPyro was between 99% and 109% for all test batches and as such

• PozPyro demonstrated excellent workability.

STRENGTH ACTIVITY INDEX (SAI)

The SAI is an industry standard for measuring the compressive strength of cement mortar cubes. As announced in a press release on April 11, 2024, the results of the 7-day testing that showed an approximate average +45% SAI gain across four tests against the minimum target value.
In the 28-day tests announced today, Portland Cement was used as the control product, with varied compressive strengths between 35.26 and 39.62 megapascals (MPa) depending on the test.
These tests were conducted in two series, A and B, with two tests in each series, using different input variables to test for optimized results.

TESTING AGAINST MINIMUM COMPLIANCE (75% PORTLAND CEMENT MPA)

For SAI tests, a cement additive product test is acceptable at a minimum strength of 75% of the control product strength.
For one Series B test, the Portland Cement control achieved a compressive strength value of 36.18 MPa at 28 days.
An additive product would therefore be acceptable based on achieving 27.14 MPa (equating to 75% of the Portland Cement control strength).
The results for the individual Series B test showed a blend of Portland Cement containing 20% PozPyro far surpassed this target, achieving a peak result of 54.15 MPa

• – a result 99.56% higher than the minimum acceptable value.

The overall average gain for all tests in both series A and B was +67.43% against the minimum compliant for an acceptable cement additive product.

TESTING AGAINST MAXIMUM COMPLIANCE (100% PORTLAND CEMENT MPA)

When compared to a 100% value of Portland Cement alone, this same Series B PozPyro/Portland Cement blend test surpassed even the full-strength value of the Portland Cement control product by up to 49.67%.
The overall average gain for all tests in both series A and B was +25% against the maximum product compliance for an acceptable cement additive product.
- This result means that the PozPyro material, when added to Portland Cement at a 20%/80% blend, outperformed a cement-only Portland Cement control in strength tests by 25%.
****
“These 28-day test results confirm the impressive results achieved by the previous 7-day tests, and underscore yet again the potential transformative nature of plasma in producing materials, in both an economically and environmentally beneficial manner, that are key to heavy industry,” said P. Peter Pascali, President and CEO of PyroGenesis.
“Not only were we able to far surpass the minimum acceptable product standard compared to 75% of the control, but when compared to a full value of the control the PozPyro green cement additive showed a 49.67% gain.
- In other words, these tests suggest that not only can PozPyro potentially outperform other traditional cement additive products in strength, it has the potential to directly outperform pure cement alone.
As I’ve stated before, the cement industry is a key target for us, and we have high expectations for the PozPyro green cement additive material.”
​
**** All images are in the original PR here : https://finance.yahoo.com/news/pyrogenesis-announces-28-day-lab-110000788.html
​
Image 1: A comparison of the four individual Series A and Series B strength tests, measured at 7- and 28-days in megapascals (MPa) of a 20% PozPyro/80% Portland Cement blend against a 100% pure Portland Cement control, a 20% fly ash blend, a 20% ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBFS) blend, and a 20% silica fume blend produced using traditional methods.
Steve Harpur, CEO of Progressive Planet, commented on the results over the last month during which Progressive Planet prepared four separate batches of cement mortar cubes to test, under the American Society for Testing and Materials (“ASTM”) testing protocol, at both 7 and 28 days for compressive strength: “These results were exceptional and provide us the technical confidence to take the next steps to bring this product to market. In the Pacific Northwest alone, over one million tons of fly ash will cease to be generated by the summer of 2025 at which time two massive thermal coal to energy facilities will have finished converting from burning coal to natural gas.”
​
**** All images are in the original PR here : https://finance.yahoo.com/news/pyrogenesis-announces-28-day-lab-110000788.html
​
Image 2: A comparison of the Series A and Series B strength tests, measured at 7- and 28-days in megapascals (MPa) of a 20% PozPyro/80% Portland Cement blend, using averages of each of two tests within both Series A and Series B, against 100% pure Portland Cement control, 20% fly ash blend, 20% ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBFS) blend, and 20% silica fume blend.

CO2 EMISSIONS / LACK THEREOF

While compressive strength is key to overall product viability, the reduction of CO2 emissions achieved by using PyroGenesis’ plasma technology, a low carbon emitting process, has the potential to offer further “green” benefits.
CO2 emissions within a product lifecycle are defined globally within 3 categories: Scope 1, Scope 2, and Scope.
Generally speaking:

• Scope 1 emissions are direct greenhouse gas emissions caused by the company’s production processes.
• Scope 2 emissions are indirect emissions, that factors in the use of energy purchased externally (and the CO2 created as a result of that energy being originally produced).
• Scope 3 emissions represent the CO2 emissions from operations upstream and downstream of the company’s operations, such as raw material production, transportation, waste, and end of life remediation.

When compared to other traditional cement additives, the production of PozPyro may result in dramatically lower CO2 emissions.
For the purposes of the graph below, Scope 2 emissions regarding electricity usage have been factored into PozPyro’s emission level.
Without these Scope 2 emissions, the greenhouse gas emissions released during the production of PozPyro may be virtually zero.
​
**** All images are in the original PR here : https://finance.yahoo.com/news/pyrogenesis-announces-28-day-lab-110000788.html
​
Image 3: A comparison of CO2 emitted during the production of 1 tonne of PozPyro vs. other cement additive products.
CO2 emission assigned to PozPyro comes from production of electricity subsequently used by the process, not from the process itself.
“These are the best results we have ever seen in an alternative cementing material.
The fact that silica-based cements do not off gas CO2 is an additional bonus to the exceptional compressive strength results,” added Steve Gurney, President of Progressive Planet.
​
**** All images are in the original PR here : https://finance.yahoo.com/news/pyrogenesis-announces-28-day-lab-110000788.html
Image 4: A zero-CO2, energy-efficient conversion of crystalline quartz to amorphous silica through PyroGenesis’ plasma process.

POTENTIAL ADRESSABLE MARKET

According to Progressive Planet’s press release of today, it was noted that the North American cement market size reached 194.2 million US tons in 2023, and they expect that it will reach 279.8 million tons by 2032, reflecting an annual growth rate of 4% between 2024 and 2032.
Assuming that pozzolanic cements could be a substitute for 20% of Portland Cement, the total addressable North American market is projected to reach over 55 million tons by 2032.
At a projected price of US$200 per ton by 2032, the potential market is over $11 billion USD per annum by that time.

NEXT STEPS: PILOT PLANT

Now that the compressive strength of PozPyro has been validated, the next critical step is to progress towards the Pilot Plant stage. In preparation for this phase, an engineering feasibility study will be conducted over the next several months.
This comprehensive study will focus on quantifying various critical elements to ensure the economic viability of the pilot plant operations.
Key considerations will include maximizing heat recovery and other efficiency metrics, which are essential for sustainable and cost-effective production.
We are committed to rigorous evaluation and optimization processes, aiming to address all technical and economic aspects of the pilot plant.
Updates on our progress and findings from the feasibility study will be provided in due course, as we move closer to achieving a fully operational pilot plant that meets our high standards for innovation and efficiency.
PyroGenesis’ involvement in developing PozPyro from quartz is part of PyroGenesis’ three-tiered solution ecosystem that aligns with economic drivers that are key to global heavy industry.
PozPyro is part of PyroGenesis’ Commodity Security & Optimization tier, where the recovery of viable metals and the optimization of production to increase output helps to maximize raw materials and improve the availability of critical minerals.

About PyroGenesis Canada Inc.

PyroGenesis Canada Inc., a high-tech company, is a proud leader in the design, development, manufacture and commercialization of advanced plasma processes and sustainable solutions which reduce greenhouse gases (GHG) and are economically attractive alternatives to conventional “dirty” processes.
PyroGenesis has created proprietary, patented and advanced plasma technologies that are being vetted and adopted by multiple multibillion dollar industry leaders in four massive markets: iron ore pelletization, aluminum, waste management, and additive manufacturing.
With a team of experienced engineers, scientists and technicians working out of its Montreal office, and its 3,800 m2 and 2,940 m2 manufacturing facilities, PyroGenesis maintains its competitive advantage by remaining at the forefront of technology development and commercialization.
The operations are ISO 9001:2015 and AS9100D certified, having been ISO certified since 1997.
For more information, please visit: www.pyrogenesis.com.

About Progressive Planet

https://progressiveplanet.com
Progressive Planet is a CleanTech and manufacturing company with proven product lines based in Kamloops, British Columbia.
The company’s expertise lies in developing critical low-carbon and carbon sequestering solutions using our owned mineral assets and recycled materials to create planet-friendly products that fight climate change and protect our planet's health.

Progressive Planet products are in 10,000+ retail stores across North America.

Progressive Planet’s innovations, created at their C-Quester™ Centre of Sustainable Innovation, bring positive disruption to the cement, agricultural and animal-care sectors.
​

PYR.TO (ASK @ 0.54)

• PLAN.VN (ASK @ 0.125)

Results surpass Portland Cement plus all traditional cement additive blends in pursuit of fly ash replacement in cement.
PyroGenesis Canada Inc. ( http://pyrogenesis.com ), a high-tech company that :

• designs,
• develops,
• manufactures and commercializes
• advanced plasma processes and sustainable solutions
• which are geared to reduce greenhouse gases (GHG) and address environmental pollutants,

is pleased to announce today that it has been advised by its client, Progressive Planet,

• that the latest series of compressive strength tests on its PozPyro green cement additive product
• reveal impressive results,
• posting strength comparisons significantly above the acceptable standard for similar material.
• PozPyro enhances the strength of concrete as a replacement for fly ash, which is in diminishing supply.

PozPyro, a cement alternative, is being developed in collaboration with Progressive Planet as a supplementary cementing material (SCM)

- designed to partially replace traditional Portland Cement.

Of note, Portland Cement emits substantial amounts of CO2 during its production.
PozPyro, on the other hand, is created by using a PyroGenesis plasma-based process that transforms quartz silica, a widely available material, into a SCM (PozPyro),

• without off-gassing CO2 during the production process.

This innovation comes at a time when the cement industry seeks more sustainable practices without compromising quality or performance.
“Quartz silica is one of the most abundant materials in the earth’s crust,” said P. Peter Pascali, President and CEO of PyroGenesis.
“The ability to economically convert it into PozPyro could offer a new supply of material to compensate for the diminishing supply of fly ash, a common SCM, which, by the way,

is generated by the same coal fired power plants which are being targeted for shut down in Canada by 2030.”

According to Progressive Planet’s news release today, concrete producers are looking for SCMs that

• (i) increase the compressive strength of their mix while at the same time
• (ii) lowering their carbon footprint without sacrificing workability.

WORKABILITY
The workability of cement is measured by water demand and is a measure of its ease of use in various concrete applications.
The smaller the water demand number, the better the reading.
A passing water demand number must be less than 115% of the water demand of the control mix.
The water demand for PozPyro was between 99% and 109% for all test batches and as such

• PozPyro demonstrated excellent workability.

STRENGTH ACTIVITY INDEX (SAI)

The SAI is an industry standard for measuring the compressive strength of cement mortar cubes. As announced in a press release on April 11, 2024, the results of the 7-day testing that showed an approximate average +45% SAI gain across four tests against the minimum target value.
In the 28-day tests announced today, Portland Cement was used as the control product, with varied compressive strengths between 35.26 and 39.62 megapascals (MPa) depending on the test.
These tests were conducted in two series, A and B, with two tests in each series, using different input variables to test for optimized results.

TESTING AGAINST MINIMUM COMPLIANCE (75% PORTLAND CEMENT MPA)

For SAI tests, a cement additive product test is acceptable at a minimum strength of 75% of the control product strength.
For one Series B test, the Portland Cement control achieved a compressive strength value of 36.18 MPa at 28 days.
An additive product would therefore be acceptable based on achieving 27.14 MPa (equating to 75% of the Portland Cement control strength).
The results for the individual Series B test showed a blend of Portland Cement containing 20% PozPyro far surpassed this target, achieving a peak result of 54.15 MPa

• – a result 99.56% higher than the minimum acceptable value.

The overall average gain for all tests in both series A and B was +67.43% against the minimum compliant for an acceptable cement additive product.

TESTING AGAINST MAXIMUM COMPLIANCE (100% PORTLAND CEMENT MPA)

When compared to a 100% value of Portland Cement alone, this same Series B PozPyro/Portland Cement blend test surpassed even the full-strength value of the Portland Cement control product by up to 49.67%.
The overall average gain for all tests in both series A and B was +25% against the maximum product compliance for an acceptable cement additive product.
- This result means that the PozPyro material, when added to Portland Cement at a 20%/80% blend, outperformed a cement-only Portland Cement control in strength tests by 25%.
****
“These 28-day test results confirm the impressive results achieved by the previous 7-day tests, and underscore yet again the potential transformative nature of plasma in producing materials, in both an economically and environmentally beneficial manner, that are key to heavy industry,” said P. Peter Pascali, President and CEO of PyroGenesis.
“Not only were we able to far surpass the minimum acceptable product standard compared to 75% of the control, but when compared to a full value of the control the PozPyro green cement additive showed a 49.67% gain.
- In other words, these tests suggest that not only can PozPyro potentially outperform other traditional cement additive products in strength, it has the potential to directly outperform pure cement alone.
As I’ve stated before, the cement industry is a key target for us, and we have high expectations for the PozPyro green cement additive material.”
​
**** All images are in the original PR here : https://finance.yahoo.com/news/pyrogenesis-announces-28-day-lab-110000788.html
​
Image 1: A comparison of the four individual Series A and Series B strength tests, measured at 7- and 28-days in megapascals (MPa) of a 20% PozPyro/80% Portland Cement blend against a 100% pure Portland Cement control, a 20% fly ash blend, a 20% ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBFS) blend, and a 20% silica fume blend produced using traditional methods.
Steve Harpur, CEO of Progressive Planet, commented on the results over the last month during which Progressive Planet prepared four separate batches of cement mortar cubes to test, under the American Society for Testing and Materials (“ASTM”) testing protocol, at both 7 and 28 days for compressive strength: “These results were exceptional and provide us the technical confidence to take the next steps to bring this product to market. In the Pacific Northwest alone, over one million tons of fly ash will cease to be generated by the summer of 2025 at which time two massive thermal coal to energy facilities will have finished converting from burning coal to natural gas.”
​
**** All images are in the original PR here : https://finance.yahoo.com/news/pyrogenesis-announces-28-day-lab-110000788.html
​
Image 2: A comparison of the Series A and Series B strength tests, measured at 7- and 28-days in megapascals (MPa) of a 20% PozPyro/80% Portland Cement blend, using averages of each of two tests within both Series A and Series B, against 100% pure Portland Cement control, 20% fly ash blend, 20% ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBFS) blend, and 20% silica fume blend.

CO2 EMISSIONS / LACK THEREOF

While compressive strength is key to overall product viability, the reduction of CO2 emissions achieved by using PyroGenesis’ plasma technology, a low carbon emitting process, has the potential to offer further “green” benefits.
CO2 emissions within a product lifecycle are defined globally within 3 categories: Scope 1, Scope 2, and Scope.
Generally speaking:

• Scope 1 emissions are direct greenhouse gas emissions caused by the company’s production processes.
• Scope 2 emissions are indirect emissions, that factors in the use of energy purchased externally (and the CO2 created as a result of that energy being originally produced).
• Scope 3 emissions represent the CO2 emissions from operations upstream and downstream of the company’s operations, such as raw material production, transportation, waste, and end of life remediation.

When compared to other traditional cement additives, the production of PozPyro may result in dramatically lower CO2 emissions.
For the purposes of the graph below, Scope 2 emissions regarding electricity usage have been factored into PozPyro’s emission level.
Without these Scope 2 emissions, the greenhouse gas emissions released during the production of PozPyro may be virtually zero.
​
**** All images are in the original PR here : https://finance.yahoo.com/news/pyrogenesis-announces-28-day-lab-110000788.html
​
Image 3: A comparison of CO2 emitted during the production of 1 tonne of PozPyro vs. other cement additive products.
CO2 emission assigned to PozPyro comes from production of electricity subsequently used by the process, not from the process itself.
“These are the best results we have ever seen in an alternative cementing material.
The fact that silica-based cements do not off gas CO2 is an additional bonus to the exceptional compressive strength results,” added Steve Gurney, President of Progressive Planet.
​
**** All images are in the original PR here : https://finance.yahoo.com/news/pyrogenesis-announces-28-day-lab-110000788.html
Image 4: A zero-CO2, energy-efficient conversion of crystalline quartz to amorphous silica through PyroGenesis’ plasma process.

POTENTIAL ADRESSABLE MARKET

According to Progressive Planet’s press release of today, it was noted that the North American cement market size reached 194.2 million US tons in 2023, and they expect that it will reach 279.8 million tons by 2032, reflecting an annual growth rate of 4% between 2024 and 2032.
Assuming that pozzolanic cements could be a substitute for 20% of Portland Cement, the total addressable North American market is projected to reach over 55 million tons by 2032.
At a projected price of US$200 per ton by 2032, the potential market is over $11 billion USD per annum by that time.

NEXT STEPS: PILOT PLANT

Now that the compressive strength of PozPyro has been validated, the next critical step is to progress towards the Pilot Plant stage. In preparation for this phase, an engineering feasibility study will be conducted over the next several months.
This comprehensive study will focus on quantifying various critical elements to ensure the economic viability of the pilot plant operations.
Key considerations will include maximizing heat recovery and other efficiency metrics, which are essential for sustainable and cost-effective production.
We are committed to rigorous evaluation and optimization processes, aiming to address all technical and economic aspects of the pilot plant.
Updates on our progress and findings from the feasibility study will be provided in due course, as we move closer to achieving a fully operational pilot plant that meets our high standards for innovation and efficiency.
PyroGenesis’ involvement in developing PozPyro from quartz is part of PyroGenesis’ three-tiered solution ecosystem that aligns with economic drivers that are key to global heavy industry.
PozPyro is part of PyroGenesis’ Commodity Security & Optimization tier, where the recovery of viable metals and the optimization of production to increase output helps to maximize raw materials and improve the availability of critical minerals.

About PyroGenesis Canada Inc.

PyroGenesis Canada Inc., a high-tech company, is a proud leader in the design, development, manufacture and commercialization of advanced plasma processes and sustainable solutions which reduce greenhouse gases (GHG) and are economically attractive alternatives to conventional “dirty” processes.
PyroGenesis has created proprietary, patented and advanced plasma technologies that are being vetted and adopted by multiple multibillion dollar industry leaders in four massive markets: iron ore pelletization, aluminum, waste management, and additive manufacturing.
With a team of experienced engineers, scientists and technicians working out of its Montreal office, and its 3,800 m2 and 2,940 m2 manufacturing facilities, PyroGenesis maintains its competitive advantage by remaining at the forefront of technology development and commercialization.
The operations are ISO 9001:2015 and AS9100D certified, having been ISO certified since 1997.
For more information, please visit: www.pyrogenesis.com.

About Progressive Planet

https://progressiveplanet.com
Progressive Planet is a CleanTech and manufacturing company with proven product lines based in Kamloops, British Columbia.
The company’s expertise lies in developing critical low-carbon and carbon sequestering solutions using our owned mineral assets and recycled materials to create planet-friendly products that fight climate change and protect our planet's health.

Progressive Planet products are in 10,000+ retail stores across North America.

Progressive Planet’s innovations, created at their C-Quester™ Centre of Sustainable Innovation, bring positive disruption to the cement, agricultural and animal-care sectors.
​

TL;DR class descriptions/info to help underclassmen know about classes thru personal experiences. Add to it with extra info or questions!
To all the incoming freshmen or other underclassmen - you’ll prolly hear it a lot, but the time really does go by so fast. Enjoy it, soak it in, and step out of your comfort zone. Someone posted their classes thru Purdue to let other students know how those classes were (in case it was a niche/high-level class or it wasn’t on RateMyProfessor). That was pretty helpful to me so Imma do it too. I’ll let u kno how the courses went and what I can remember. I’m graduating from the College of Ag with a B.S. in Animal Sciences with a concentration in Biosciences and minors in Biotechnology and Real Estate. I came into Purdue with AP and Dual Credits, so some things I didn’t take. Anyway, here are the classes I took.
Anyone who’s taken any of these, please add on/say smth else if it has changed! Underclassmen, feel free to ask about them!
————————————————————————
FRESHMAN YEAR
AGR 101: Intro to Ag & Purdue (Multiple lecturers)
This course was THE intro course to Purdue and Ag (duh). It was a 1/2 semester course so I was done with it by week 8 and there was only a quiz. We were told the purpose of Purdue being land-grant and were just intro’d to the different parts/departments of the college of Ag + different success tips. This was also the class where u begin (already) thinking about your 4-year plan and create a LinkedIn. Easy A, just show up and learn about the college of Ag
AGR 114: Intro to ANSC Programs (Ashley York)
Also a 1/2 semester course that was done by Oct. This class just went into depth on what to expect as a student in the department. You may start work on a resumé, continue with planning or LinkedIn. Again, easy A, just show up. Also, Ashley was a saint helping me each year to make sure I was on track, even tho she wasn’t my advisor.
ANSC 102: Intro to Animal Ag (Elizabeth Karcher)
This class was the first “real” class of college. It was just an intro to different domestic species and the operations tht are part of animal ag. I think there was also a lab with the class where u were introduced to animals. Dr. Karcher also was a pretty good professor. Just pay attention - it’s sort of memorization for random facts about animals/common sense depending on what u took in high school/home life in a rural area. Should be easy A.
CHM 115: Gen Chem (Multiple lecturers)
Was never a fan of chemistry, so this class I went into with dread. I didn’t want to take AP Chem, and just dealt with it in college. Honestly, if u took honors/were a good student in hs chemistry, there should be no problem - was basically just like a high school class. There was a lab that went with this course, but because of COVID, I just had an online worksheet to do every week for pre-, in-, and post-lab so I can’t speak on it. If u aren’t inclined to chem, it might take a bit of extra studying, but I was never worried.
PHIL 110: Intro to Philosophy (Taylor Davis)
To be fair, I never exactly wanted to take this exact class. I came from a small town in the Midwest, so I wanted to be sure I wasn’t dumb or anything to the people, cultures, etc. around me. Told my advisor I wanted to take a class to give me more of a “world” perspective, so she suggested the class. It honestly was not bad at all. The professor knew what he was talking abt and very accepting of questions. We learned how to tear down an argument and build it up in several ways and talked about cool things like if we have free will, does God exist, etc. The only assignments that counted for the sem were a midterm and 2 papers - 1 small and 1 large philosophical essay over any topic from the class. Definitely changed my outlook, would recommend taking it. The first part of class was harder - making sure u understand why/how an argument does or doesn’t work - but the rest was fun/easy as the topics were just presented and talked about.
AGEC 217: Economics (Larry Deboer)
I found Econ as a topic in and of itself to be quite boring. Supply and demand, money, etc. The class kind of turned out that way. Its presented as basically supply/demand and reasons for changes to the them were slowly added throughout the semester. We had several assignments, but they were nothing terrible. Gotta give props to the professor, tho. He knew the class wasn’t great but made it fun. Also, the class is flexible for schedules as in some situations it can count for credit in place of ECON251.
POL 223: Intro to Environmental Policy (Tara Grillos)
When I first started, I thought the route I wanted was ANSC with some focus in environmental issues. That’s why I took this class. I don’t understand the “intro” part, really. The whole class was presented as just case studies for things that have happened that impacted policies from the late 1800s/early 1900s until recently. Some of the info was cool. I don’t remember much for assignments, but there was a group project/paper where u had to decide on an environmental issue, state how u plan to fix it, on what level of government, etc. It wasn’t a crazy class to be in as a freshman, but it was not what I was expecting for a POL class.
ANSC 181: Orientation to ANSC (Elizabeth Byers)
Another 1/2 semester course. This class, as far as I can remember, was just for showing u the possibilities available to u in ANSC. This was specifically ANSC. It went over every concentration and what jobs/salaries there were. This was also a class where we were assigned to create our resumés (professionally) and start networking. Just as, if not easier than the other 1/2 semester classes so far.
ANSC 221: Principles of Animal Nutrition (Dale Forsyth)
Sorry but not sorry for anyone in ANSC. The class is boring, but Dr. Dale Forsyth is such a sweet old man. This class is the intro for nutrition in ANSC. U will learn the different required nutrients, food stuffs (supplements and stuff too) that have these nutrients, what happens when animals are given too little of these, and how to balance/create rations for animals (ruminant and non-ruminant). As long as u are okay/good with algebra, there shouldn’t be a problem. U just need to solve systems of equations in Excel to get the right weight of a food stuff. Homework was balancing rations. Exams looked at that + nutrients and their deficiencies. Dr. Forsyth also talks fast and doesn’t slow down because he has a lot to get thru. Come into the class knowing it prolly isn’t going to be very fun, but u need to know it. Try to find something interesting in the whole.
BIOL 111: Fundamentals of Bio II (Sean Humphrey)
Not sure how this class really is. I came into college loving biology and being (not to sound like an ass) great at it. To me, it was easy and relearning biology from high school for a bit. To others it may be a bit more difficult. There is just a lot of memorization. The professor was nice and answered my questions when I had them and explained in great detail if I was confused. I can’t remember any assignments I turned in, or anything about exams. Overall, I thought it was an easy class, but be the judge urself.
CHM 116: Gen Chem (Multiple lecturers)
Just a continuation of CHM 115. It picked up where it left off. Got a little harder, but it was nowhere as hard as TV or anything makes it. There are definitely topics that show up from hs again, but a lot is new. Wasn’t fun for this class switching lecturers every few weeks since they each had their own lecture style. Again, there was a lab section, but because of COVID, it was a worksheet. Not the worst class, but a meh class.
MA 16020: Applied Calc II (Alexandros Kafkas)
The first and only time I had to take math here. In hs I took MA 165 and thought it was a breeze (prolly bc it was hs). To anyone wondering, MA 165 SHOULD count in place of MA 16010 in college of ag. With that in mind, I went into the course knowing what Purdue math is known for, but still keepin an open mind with my abilities. I’m really proud of the grade I got, too. I think a lot of the course depends on the lecturer - mine was good at teaching us new concepts. Learn all you can about the lecturer beforehand, find out if they are good, and see it for yourself. We had quizzes in class every week (MWF) over the previous lecture and homework thru LON-CAPA that was usually due the day aftebefore (Tues, Thurs, Sun, I think). The quizzes and homework were good starting problems. The exams were tough and harder than quizzes/hw. If u’ve done well in math, but aren’t a prodigy or someone who can put in hrs of work, don’t expect to get likely higher than mid-70s on exams. It was common to get around a 50-60%. They do curve “if it’s necessary” but it is ALWAYS necessary.
————————————————————————
SOPHOMORE YEAR
AGR 201: Communicating Across Cultures (Pamala Morris)
To start…BOO. Was not a fan of this class. Felt like it was a money grab and busy work. It was required for some international understanding credits. The content wasnt interesting but for sure important. We were taught to basically be good ppl and about the different types of hardships that groups of ppl could go thru (ageism, sexism, racism, classism, etc.). We were required to buy the book, which was $50, but written by the prof and from what I assume was her website. I don’t recall ever using it unless it was necessary for an assignment. The class helps u relate and think critically, but is done in a piss-poor way. It could hv been the COVID aftermath where lecture was done virtually but we had a class later on with other students for a “lab”. Quizzes were easy, and overall easy, but so bad too.
SPAN 201: Spanish III (Nancy Reyes)
I know I’ve said this already abt other courses, but this still applies. This course was 100% a high school class. I did a placement test into this course (after 3 years in HS Spanish - Fr. to Jr. - with a 2 year gap of not learning) and got all credit for Spanish 1 and 2. Took it for international understanding credits. This course made sure u knew the basics again, spent a lot of time in past tense, then ended w maybe a month in subjective and future tense. There were a few speaking assignments and cultural readings/lectures. Was encouraged to speak Spanish for class, but the prof knew that couldn’t happen but still helped us all. Exams included MC, writing, and listening. Not sure if this is the same for other languages, but hopefully it is.
CHM 255 + 25501: Orgo + Lab (Elizabeth Parkinson)
Dreaded this class, but went in confidently. The class sucks, no other way abt it. It was a lot of memorization and practice. A lot of the “basic” stuff started sticking about halfway thru the semester. It doesn’t help that I stopped going to lecture about 3/4 thru the sem. It wasn’t as hard as expected, but it was still quite hard. The prof was amazing at making the content interesting. Labs were ran by GTAs. Depending on the section your GTA may not kno anything. The labs also did not go along with the lecture - they are 2 separate courses that can individually be passed or failed. Exams were as you would expect with the course - a few high spots among a crowd of C’s and D’s. The lab had multiple things due every week w the semester started. It was expected to do ur pre-lab at start of week, turn in ur in-lab immediately after finishing lab, then the previous week’s post-lab/final lab was due. The lab also holds the policy that if u don’t show up dressed right or sleep late, if you don’t show up within 10/15min of start that u can’t show up and will receive a 0 for the lab.
ANSC 230: Physiology of Domestic Animals (Rod Allrich)
This class taught me a lot. Each week was a different body system and learning info regarding animals individually. Things were taught in general as overarching concepts, but then things were applied as necessary for individual species of animals. Everything was brought up from the digestive system to the endocrine system. The class met 4 days a week and had a quiz once a week. There was no lab when I took the course. The specific professor I had was also interesting to say the least. Dr. Allrich is a funny, good man, but he does not use or create slides. Instead he uses his own website to post info (usually from Merck veterinary) abt whatever it is he wanted u to learn. In class he would just ramble on about what he thought was important. ANYTHING he said could be test material - no matter what (I was told by an upperclassman to remember that his favorite pie was sour cream and raisin pie bc it was a quiz question they had). Now, there is a lab that goes with the course. Also, if u hv Cabot the course material and class are much harder than with Rod. There are expectations, lectures, and more. Regardless of the professor, the information that was taught was useful, remembered, and interesting. In any class, Rod typically will have this structure but will grade easily. Quizzes will be to write statements of fact and exams won’t exist or will be take-home with only having 5 paragraphs to write using a word bank
ABE 226: Biotech Lab I (Kari Clase)
This was the first course I took for my minor in Biotechnology. I did not know what to expect going in as I didn’t grasp the scope of biotech. The course was ran well. The whole class is a wet lab where u are in the scientific process trying to find a new species of bacteriophage. U dig in dirt, do some pipetting, use beakers, make plates, isolate DNA, and send it off. Any research u do/finding a phage gets put into a national database for phage research. U do hv lab notebooks that get checked, but hv an outline to go off. There were several quizzes and deliverables that had us learn about phage more, or aseptic technique. It was a good class. U do have to buy a lab coat (which is kinda cool). Easy class that kickstarted my interest.
CHM 256 + 25601: Orgo II + Lab (David Thompson)
This class was disastrous. It was me, the content AND the professor as to why that was the case. This was just a continuation of course and lab. The new content was harder to wrap my head around, + I stopped going to the lectures about halfway thru the sem. To make matters worse, the class was early and the prof was speaking in mach turtle. I would listen to the lectures a day later so I could 2x speed thru them and the man was sounding like a normal person talked. This class was harder than the previous course. If u didn’t like CHM 255, sorry this is worse. The lab was just the same as the previous sem, but the GTAs changed. Again, labs didn’t go with the lecture and are 2 individual courses to be passed or failed separately. I passed but the class made me rethink my life once or twice and was potentially the worst class I ever took.
STAT 301: Elementary Stat Methods (Spencer Hamrick)
I did not enjoy this course a single bit - besides the professor. The course throws, what I felt like, was the entire concept, terms, rules, designs of statistics at u. It was a lot at once for me. I felt like there was a disconnect between what I was learning and in what ways it applied to me. It wasn’t too difficult, but the class was boring. There was also a lab section that was not great either. We were forced to use SRSS. There were homework assignments on a different software/website that equally were boring. The exams were harder than expected - there were some sections with questions with such small disparities that the answer came down to a difference of 1 word in a sentence. Overall, there’s a lot to learn and it’s all pretty basic to give a general understanding, but it was done poorly. If it was done better, it likely would have been an easy course. This course tho is also one of the worst classes I took.
AGRY 320: Genetics (Joseph Anderson)
There’s not much to say about this course. It was genetics. It felt like another continuation from the end of BIOL 111. It built a foundation for DNA, chromosomes, and went from there. There was a lot of higher thinking and content that was build upon thru the semester. It was a bit of memorization, but the content was fun. There were hotseat/iclicker questions for each lecture. Prof. Anderson was also really good at presenting the info.
AGRY 321: Genetics Lab (Aneesha Kulkarni)
This was the lab that went with AGRY 320. It was separate from the lecture. I do not believe it ever followed along with the lecture. The semester was spent with Arabidopsis. From the plant, we extracted DNA, did PCR, did mutant analysis, etc. The whole semester led up to a final lab report for what had been done that semester. There were also some small lab assignments that needed done. The class was also serious about attendance which could have made a major impact on grades. It is also typically ran by a GTA. It was fun and I enjoyed it. There was never really any work that needed to be done outside of class and at times it let out early.
ANSC 333: Physiology of Reproduction (Jonathan Pasternak)
This was a good class. The content focused on female anatomy/physiology first, then male anatomy/physiology, then on interactions and changes to the body through hormones and development. I found the class to be interesting as there is a lot more that goes into reproduction that u think. It’s a lot of cool info thrown out, but in a manageable way. Notes can go fast n there is a lot of terms and items to pay attention to. There was also a lab portion to this class. The lab went with what we learned in lectures. It was hands-on learning and doing things. It might sound gross but we had a lab where we took fetuses from a pig uterus to weigh and look at. We also looked at pig semen under a microscope. The professor was obsessed with histology. Expect to look at many slides of different tissues and know how/why they differ, where they are from, etc. I don’t remember assignments, but there was a lab practical that involved many things. Overall, it was a fun class.
ABE 227: Biotech Lab II (Kari Clase)
This class was busy. There were lots of things that needed to be done often (oddly no true deadlines it felt like). This was the dry lab portion. After ABE 226, any DNA that was collected sufficiently was sequenced and the data came back. That’s essentially what the semester was for. With the DNA from a phage, u must make entries to find out the start/stop site of genes, gene function; BLAST the genes, gather evidence there is truly a gene, and more. There were some small assignments with deliverables. There was also a larger project that was put into the undergrad research symposium. From the DNA, a small group chose a gene and researched. A lot of busy work and nights up, but there was a final genome announcement and research went into real life.
————————————————————————
JUNIOR YEAR
HIST 33805: History of Human Rights (Rebekah Klein-Pejsova)
This class was a requirement for an upper level humanities course. This class was easy and interactive. There were some readings that had to be done outside of class, but not much else was required. U would read, then come to class, fill out a discussion, and talk. The content started back in history and moved all the way to just beyond the Holocaust. There were a couple writing assignments that were like a paragraph. The final was to write a paragraph on when u thought the history of human rights began. Again, easy and almost no work required.
BCHM 307: Biochem (Barbara Golden)
I loved this course. Dr. Golden was soft spoken but she made sure u got the info u needed. The content felt like a mix of genetics and chem. The course was biology-sided for those that hate chem. This course went back to the central dogma and such, but then included a lot of metabolism and inner workings of cells. There were parts involving the Citric acid cycle and other “basic” biology concepts that went into further explanation from a different perspective. I believe there were also hotseat/iclicker questions. If u liked biology or genetics, u should like this course, too.
BCHM 309: Biochem Lab (Orla Hart)
Just like the genetics lab, this lab did content that led up to something big at the end. The lab was spent learning basic lab technique, then focused on isolating and purifying LDH from a Bradford assay. There were lab reports/assignments, but they all help and lead to the big lab report. It was a fun time. Dr. Hart was a fantastic prof for the course as she fully knew the topic, always helped out, and had high expectations. She would also joke and talk with us. She shared about her family (she’s Irish), her cats, n more. + she would talk with you in her office, where she had Ghirardelli chocolates to eat. There was a written midterm + u are required to wear a lab coat and goggles during lab.
ANSC 311: Animal Breeding & Genetics (Donna Lofgren)
This was another class that I liked a lot. For anyone interested in this topic, it is not what u expect. The class is not punnet squares and seeing what traits u can see. This class was a lot of math. You had to find the allelic/gene frequencies, var, covariance, selection intensity, generation interval, EBV, etc. I cannot stress that this class is a lot of math (prolly 75/25 to 85/15 for math/concepts). It is, however, one of the few genetics restrictive selectives for ANSC (if I remember right). There is other content too, learning about how to breed animals, components of breeding and genetics, etc. There is a lecture and lab. The lab is when homework was intro’d and we were given time to ask questions/complete it. The lab lasted 2 hours, and usually there would be several homework problems left. There was also a large project that used a sim (mine was beef, other years used lamb/sheep). I would have to cull and breed to get better genetics, get rid of disease, etc. The better the offspring the better. This sim was paired with an arrow chart and written report. Lot of work, but a lot of fun.
ANSC 326: Applied Non-Ruminant Nutrition (John Radcliffe)
This class was boring. Unless u love animal nutrition, it’s hard for it not to be. This was like a continuation of ANSC 221, but only focused on (essentially) pigs. Once again, just learning the background/basic info for feeding animals, providing nutrients, and balancing/creating rations. Also, this class also uses a lot of Excel - more than ANSC 221. There was a final for the course, but it was only a 1/2 semester course. There may have also been a lab section, but the work typically finished quickly.
ANSC 446: Companion Animal Mgmt (Rod Allrich)
Another course with Rod. It was basically nonsense. U learned what it took to keep companion animals healthy and managed. Specific diseases/interests were looked at for animals during class + issues/problems with animal clinics, shelters, etc. There wasnt much to learn. Since it was Rod, there were no slides. Anything written could be tested. Students had to present some issue with companion animals for points twice in the semester. There was also an animal business plan due at the end of the semester. It was required to describe the location, services, employees, their benefits, etc. There were no exams, but there were his quizzes - u were provided movies to watch and write a 1-page summary/reflection on what u saw. Once u get used to Rod, his classes are some of the easiest to ever take.
MGMT 200: Intro Accounting (Terra Maienbrook)
This was my first class for my Real Estate minor. If u have taken any math class at college u should be fine. This course is an intro. U learn the accounting equation, debits, credits, depreciation, and interpreting it through balance sheets. It can get a little confusing when things are broken down further, but as long as u pay attention there shouldn’t be trouble. Just remember what debits and credits do and u should pass the course. There were assignments that helped understand what needed to be done and how the content u are learning works, but it turns into busy work later on. If u get 1 small error as ur doing ur balance sheet, then the whole problem will be wrong and it probably won’t tell u what the error is. The professor also used hotseat/iclicker for attendance, so make sure to show up. She did let u come to any section at any time and still do the attendance. Exams weren’t difficult if u pay attention and do well in lecture and homework. If u do well, the prof would even email saying that u did well.
MGMT 304: Intro to Financial Mgmt (Phil Baeza)
This class was okay. Part of it could have been it was the prof’s 2nd semester teaching here. The class was a lot of basic info for management/econ and was also a requirement for the Real Estate minor. U are taught corporate finance + the goals of it, cash flows and a bunch of math with related terms (NPV, PV, NWC, NOI, etc.) None of it was exactly difficult to figure out. The class itself wasn’t bad content-wise. Once u learned the information, it was there. There was a lot of Excel for solving problems. If u aren’t good with Excel - make that a priority. The course also had exams, but you were allowed a typed cheat sheet for each. Besides the exams, there was also a case competition (so many of these in MGMT classes). Info was gathered about a company and with a group had to decide to approve or disapprove of their loan request. Overall, not terrible, but hard to sit thru.
ANSC 303: Animal Behavior (Marisa Erasmus)
This was an interesting class to take. It was pretty fun (and I ended up as a TA, my last semester). The course is essentially psychology in animals. You learn conditioning, scientists who contributed to the study, types of interactions, and types of behaviors (maintenance, maternal, social, play, sickness, etc.) and how they are in animals. The course also has a lab section with it. The lab section is essentially to allow for time for the zoo project, although there were some labs that went to the ASREC to observe those animals. For the project u are provided an animal at the zoo to research, go to the local zoo, and observe them. When ur back you create a presentation for the research you did involving the animal and enrichment provided by the zoo. In class, there were several quizzes over lecture content plus a midterm. There were also assignments, but many of them had some involvement with the zoo. The class also had no final, but there was a final quiz. The professor did talk fast sometimes, but as long as you typed or rewrote notes later, there was no issue.
STAT 503: Stat Methods for Biology (Yan Xing)
Unsure of why, but I loved my grad level stats courses. They were much easier and fun to learn than STAT 301 (so if u hate STAT301, give 503 a try). This course basically started at the beginning. The content started with learning sample vs population, statistic vs parameter, plus sample unit, size, variables, and variable types. The course became harder as time went on, but nothing was super difficult. The topics included basic stats (mean, stdev, var, types of distributions, unions/intersection), marginal probability, tree diagrams, binomial distributions, chi-square, ANOVA, hypothesis testing, and multiple comparisons (like bonferonni). The information was always presented in a way catered to life sciences (crazy). The lectures not presented in class, but expected to be watched beforehand. I did not go to lecture, but watched the lecture videos on my own. That was enough understanding to easily pass. There were homework assignments that were due every other week. Start them sooner than later, you’ll need the time! This class was also my introduction to coding in R. I had no experience in any coding beforehand but easily got the hang of it, especially since the professor provided tutorials. It was used for every homework, basically. There were also quizzes that weren’t too difficult. The class was not easy, but it was fun.
ABE 512: Good Regulatory Practices (Keri Clase/Stephen Byrn)
This was the final class I needed to get my Biotechnology minor. It was terrible. The professors were nice, but there was no structure. The lectures were about regulatory science and dealt a lot with information from the FDA. The course went over the good and required practices required for the creation, testing, passing, and distribution of medical equipment and/or drugs. Every small detail and information that was not in lectures was required to be known. There were quizzes and assignments that all got turned in through Gradescope. The quizzes are where random information was expected to be known. The assignments were deliverables which asked some question or inquired about a part of the process and write about them. The final was a final deliverable that had to effectively be a conglomeration of the other deliverables (but not just copying and pasting). The class wasn’t hard, but very poorly set up.
————————————————————————
SENIOR YEAR
CSR 103: Intro to Personal Finance (Wookjae Heo)
I just needed a filler class in my schedule. I figured it could help learn some “real world” stuff that maybe I wasn’t sure about. The class was completely online with provided lecture videos. It was very easy and what would be expected. Topics went from how to manage debt and make sure you can get loans, to being informed about credit cards and insurance. All the information was easy to get through. There were writing assignments to be done basically every week. The professor would have you read a paper that 50/50 he had a part in writing, and answer questions. Some things were interactives that just needed to be completed (regardless of how well). Not a bad class. It will definitely pad your GPA - everything taught should be common knowledge.
MGMT 370: Real Estate Fundamentals (Lindsay Relihan)
This course was quite informative. It was an average level of difficulty. There was a lot of information that went into it - I mean it is a fundamentals class. Topics that were talked about included foundations of real estate, what is real estate, valuation of property, lending, time value of money, multiple financial ratios, and taxation. There were multiple assignments - some writing and others math. The writing was for discussions (5 of them) about certain papers provided or certain book chapters. The math assignments were problem sets to get done for what we had learned. They gave plenty of time to finish them. Beyond that, there was also another case study/competition. For this a company was selected and given potential locations to move to. You had to decide if it was worth it for the company to move locations.
ANSC 345: Animal Health Management (Rod Allrich)
For this class, I just needed to take another ANSC course. This class was practically the same as any other Rod Allrich course. We learned how to keep animals healthy and basically many different common diseases of animals. From his website, we would get brought to a page talking about some disease or medical problem that could potentially happen and have to write a 1-page summary/reflection. This happened each week. He still did in person quizzes with statements of fact. Once again, students had to make videos/presentations for the class to present on some problem. There was no final exam. Did not learn too much from this one, but it was a great space filler and GPA booster.
ANSC 481: Contemporary Issues in ANSC (Barry Delks)
This is essentially the final push for ANSC students. As seniors, you take this course to prepare you for the real world. Lectures were given by guests who the professor brought in. They would talk about their specific company, career, or niche and any issues they were seeing there plus how to stop them. The professor would then have groups get together to discuss ways to fix the problems and have the guest comment on what was said. There were also assignments to be done, but they were very easy. They were just things to make sure you were on track for a job and/or graduation (having a 30-sec intro, making a cover letter, redoing your resumé). Part of the class was also just attending the career fair.
STAT 512: Applied Regression Analysis (Tiantian Qin)
Like my other grad level stat course, I absolutely loved this one, too. This class was a DIST course. This class solely focused on regressions (simple linear and multiple linear regressions). Topics for the course started with the basics (terms of regression like betas, Xs, SSE, SSR, SST, and diagnostics) and moved to more difficult content (lack-of-fit-testing, global f-testing, transformations, ANOVA, marginal effect, coefficient of partial determination, multicollinearity, and more). I found the content interesting and it was fun to learn about. Nothing was too difficult and could always be asked about through office hours. There were homework assignments that corresponded with the lectures that were due every other week. Again, take the time. The course also used R coding for everything that was done. The course also had a couple exams to do. But the biggest thing was the regression project. This required a group of students to get together, find a set of data, and use it to form a regression analysis. There was a lot of coding involved, but it was fun parsing through and wrangling data.
MGMT 375: Real Estate Law (Cecelia Harper)
This course has been super personal and fun to take. This is one of my last courses for the Real Estate minor and I am glad to have taken it. The course goes over any and all laws that relate to real estate in some way. The course talked about property rights, subsurface rights, common laws, easements on land, financing/lending, prenuptial agreements and other contracts. Most grades come from exams, though. There were 3 during the semester plus the final. All exams (except the final) were open note and book. The final we were allowed a 1-page cheat sheet that was front and back. The only grades that did not come from exams were from the contracts we drafted. You create your own lease agreement and purchase agreement, then pair with someone to mesh them together for a new one of each. I think the course is particularly made tho by the professor. She is a practicing real estate lawyer who knows what she is talking about. She would set it up so the class was very personal and we each asked her questions. It was interesting because she could have stories about clients to connect things from class. She would always entertain questions. There was no extra credit, except for when she would randomly do attendance. The course structure could be changing quite a bit now, tho.
MGMT 43901: Real Estate Investment & Development (Michael Eriksen)
The other last course for my real estate minor. This class was a step away from what I thought it was going to be. This course is geared toward commercial development and the business side, as I felt. There was nothing really said about personal/residential property. The course topics included an overview of real estate, ways/types of investment, estimation of cash flows for commercial real estate and finance terms associated, providing loans/financing, the roles of a developer, and taxes. The course didn’t have many plain assignments. These were Excel files with attached questions and instructions. If you could follow the instructions you did well, plus the assignments built on each other, except the last one - this one used ARGUS software. The majority of the work was spent on a case competition (go figure lol). Students were put into groups to select a plot of land to develop for some commercial purpose and provide the financials, timeline, and reasoning for the decision. There were several required tasks to be done for this assignment, plus a presentation at the end. There was no final exam, but there were 2 midterms. You could use an excel sheet with notes throughout, tho. The professor was good. He catered to his students and asked questions about how we thought the class was going. A good class to take.
BCHM 421: R For Molecular Biosciences (Pete Pascuzzi)
I took this class because my previous classes had made me really like working in R. I took the class to continue on with that. If you do not have a basic understanding of R, it may be a slight learning curve. The class only met on Wednesday and Friday for 2 hours. There wasn’t a lecture every class, but there was usually some work to be done. All assignments were done through R and could typically be finished in the class period. If this wasn’t possible, it could usually be finished the next class. The class just showed different things in R, from graphics and data wrangling to how to process gene ontology. There were homeworks and labs, with labs being more involved. There was a midterm that was open resource and a project. The project was done at the very end with groups who put together code from previous lectures/labs to create an RShiny document. The class did have a final, again open resource, but any graduating seniors did not have to take the final. There was an opportunity for extra credit by creating an R notebook for all your notes for functions and lines of code. The professor was also nice, helpful, and willing to put in effort to match you.
ANSC 351: Meat Science (Yuan Kim)
This class is basically just biology plus some extra info for meat processing. If you have taken muscle biology (or just bio) you will do well. The class does have some busy work, tho. The first part of the class was solely muscle biology. After this, the class went into meat quality (including analysis, factors affecting quality, etc.), parts of production (packaging, freezing, heating), slaughter and that process, then into meat safety. The content was interesting to learn and easy to take in. The class did have several assignments. After every class was a lecture quiz, each week there was a reflection, and every so often there was a case study. Case studies involved reading a case and providing a response to address the cause of a problem and fix it. The whole semester, there was a project involving some topic in meat science (novel tech, meat in diet, lab-grown meat, alternatives, etc.). Groups got together at the beginning of the semester to make a decision on the topic. Then, throughout the semester, groups met with TAs, wrote drafts of a paper, critiqued other student papers, and made a presentation to show the class. Throughout the semester, you have to work 2 shifts at the butcher block or write a giant essay on a book, too. The class also required 4 exams and a final. If you showed up to every class, you were able to skip the final. Dr. Kim loves the topic and wants you to learn, but most of the grading will be done by TAs.

Yesterday I was listening an episode from AEA regarding vegetative and generative nutrients. In summary Jhon Kempf (AEA founder) explains how it is crucial to use Calcium (Ca) as a driver for vegetative growth response. Here I made a short summary regarding the subject:
First it is important to note that Nitrogen (specially NO3), Potassium, Chloride, and Clacium are the main nutrients for triggering vegetative response. On the other hand, generative response is partially triggered by the rest of nutrients, but specially Manganese, Phosphorus, and Ammonium have a strong influence.
There is vegetative and generative growth happening all the time, the ratio will be changing depending on the lifecycle stage and many other factors. Auxin and Cytokinin are plant hormones that act like chemical messengers. Auxin cordinate vegetative response and Cytokinin generative response. They are produced in specific tissues throughout the plant: Auxin in the shoot tips and seeds, and Cytokinin in the root tips. Auxin travels down from the shoots, while Cytokinin travels up from the roots. These hormones don't work independently. They have an antagonistic relationship going on. In general terms, Auxin inhibits the effects of Cytokinin, and vice versa. It is important to add that Auxin are particullary good attracting sugar, so the highest the concentration of this hormone in a certain tissue, then the higher will be the sugar allocation.
Internode distance is an indicator for a correct generation and distribution of energy by the plant. This is because when fruiting comes, the sugar sinks will change to the fruits due to the high Auxin concentration, the first spot in the plant to stop receiving sugars for growth would be the roots, meaning that Cytokinin production would be negatively affected. As a reflex to that, vegetative growth would be boosted because Auxin will be created in greater quantities meaning that internodes will be more expanded in these situations.
The problem of stoping energy transfer to roots is that their susceptibility against diseases may increase. And the generative action will be altered due to reduction of Cytokinin production. Nitrate, Potassium, and Chlorine have a synergistic relationship with Auxin. On the other hand Calcium is a vegetative response enhancer and has a synergistic relationship with Cytokinin. Meaninig that driving vegetative response with Calcium is a relevant practice in this context. Apparently this can be done because plants do have a genetic potential to sustain a correct root growth while fruiting.
I wanted to share a small summary of the espisode, because I thought it was quite interesting. Please leave your thoughts on this, there's probably a hughe room for discussion!
Here the link for the episode in spotify.

Welcome to the maiden voyage of "Seeds of Resonance: Druidic Healing Journeys," a transformative series of alchemical practices designed to immerse you in an enriching exploration of sound as a potent healing modality. Leveraging my unique background as a Druid, Ngakpa, and seasoned sound healing teacher each episode is carefully crafted as a standalone journey.
This first one is recorded entirely improvised and spontaneously created so please forgive the odd strange noise or imperfection in the audio quality - and the sound does have a flavour of distortion annoyingly on it - but hopefully not enough to spoil the appreciation - its a learning journey for me as well :). Practiced repetitively, these sessions can and may offer balance, healing, transformation, and enhancement of magical skills.
In this inaugural episode, we embark on an immersive journey using the lifecycle of a seed as an allegory for our personal and spiritual growth. We transition through the day in seven distinct stages, each echoing a phase in the seed's life: Early Morning (Planting the Seed), Mid-Morning (The Sprout Emerging), Midday (Growing Leaves), Mid-Afternoon (The Flower Unfurls), Late Afternoon (The Flower Closes), Early Evening (Rooting Down), and Late Evening (Returning to the Seed).
Each practice is an improvised and intuitively cultivated Druidic Sadhana or "Drustara", marked by a blend of breathwork, visualisation, sounding, and magical techniques. To enhance your immersive experience, my narrations are captured and conveyed using 3D audio and meticulously woven with precisely tuned background tones, harmonic resonances, and a diverse array of field recordings from my extensive library. Join me in this transformative series as an active participant, not just a passive listener. Step into this immersive soundscape, practice along, and partake in what I hope will be an increasingly profound set of journeys and practices.
https://youtu.be/yduuPS7sOLQ?si=YYOZMFG2QY-KGJH6
You can Download the FREE ebook of the practice here : https://www.themindorchestra.com/pl/2148225555
#adaysjourney #druidry #druidicsoundhealing #mantras #seedsyllables #innergrove

Hey guys I've posted in this sub a few times before but took a really long break because I was struggling a lot with circumstances and mental health and was just really overwhelmed with all the content on here.
I figured I was doing OK just knowing about the law and trying to stay positive about things but in the past few months the 3D really started spiraling badly, I lost all of my friends, I was extremely depressed, and my relationship with my family was only getting worse. I started having panic attacks every day and i was so lost.
Worst of all the relationship between me and my SP had deteriorated into something really gross and upsetting. He started treating me really poorly, lying, avoiding me and even pushed me to the floor once.
But as you can see from the flair this is a success story! About 1 month ago I realized how bad my mental has gotten and decided it was time to fix things. And after avoiding the law for over a year it was suddenly so easy and clear!!
I started with a self care day, but not in the like shower and nails and facial way, I gave myself one day where I did a bunch of dbt worksheets, crying, listening to sad music, and just letting everything out. I comforted myself and validated my feelings without blaming myself or reinforcing any negative thoughts.
After that I went to bed and let myself wake up knowing it was a new day and my thoughts almost immediately started to conform. I genuinely just started living my life like everything was perfect, I felt a little delusional at first but I didn't feel anxious or like it was impossible. And obviously the 3D still existed and I still had problems and bad and scary and triggering moments, and I didn't ignore them or anything, I let myself get sad or disappointed and then told myself it would all work out. I just stopped letting myself accept my bad circumstances and beliefs so easily. I took every upsetting moment as just a sad moment to feel bad that didn't need to mean that the future was going to be this too. Within days I was seeing movement!
Within 2 or 3 days a house plant that I cared a lot about that was dying started to come back to life without me doing anything different.
within a week my skin completely cleared up from my depression acne. My mom and I stopped arguing so much. My grades were improving. My job started scheduling me more. People that I haven't heard from in years reached out to me out of nowhere.
and then there's the MAJOR plot line of the month
There was a music festival I wanted to go to but tickets were getting way too expensive and getting more expensive everyday but I just started living my life like I already had tickets, I was planning my outfits and my ride and just not worrying about how the tickets would get to me. Within a few days of starting to think like that I got 2 tickets for about half price. After this I started to follow some of the artists that were gonna be playing the festival just to stay updated on everything.
Around that same time my SP was starting to become the most stressful thing in my life. I was getting absurdly stressed about him all the time and crying every time I saw him. At one point I got on my knees and begged him not to leave me.
It really hit a breaking point when he told me he didn't want to see me or spend time with me at the festival. After that I realized this was the area where my self concept had barely improved at all so I started working on it, I just kept believing that we were gonna be ok and stopped letting him walk all over me just to save our relationship. I stopped begging so desperately for him to put in effort and stop avoiding and lying and being mean to me. I stopped letting him be the only important person in my life. And this was where it started to get really crazy, within the same day, one of the artists who's playing this major festival messages me tells me he recognizes me from somewhere (we've absolutely never met)and we strike up a conversation.
Over the last month or so we've been talking regularly and started flirting. it's been straight out of fan-fiction, he's an incredible artist who I have been casually listening to for over a year and I love his music and he's so nice.
After like 3 weeks of talking he tells me he's gonna upgrade my two regular tickets to vip and now I have a kinda famous music artist flirting with me, two vip tickets that I paid 1/5thprice for and an invite to meet some of the bands side stage with him.
I still love my SP and want our relationship to get better but for now I'm about to be dating a rockstar. So I don't really mind not going to the festival with him. And more importantly I'm not worried about it.
There's still a lot of stuff I'm going through and I'm still stressed and not happy all the time but only a month ago I was depressed lonely, anxious, and pathetically begging for someone's care.
You can start moving in the other direction overnight you guys. It's just a matter of being in the moment.