California eviction templatem

CACovidRentRelief

2021.07.27 06:09 Lower-Effective-616 CACovidRentRelief

California Covid-19 Rent Relief Program Tenant and Landlord Rent Assistance Neighborly Software account If you are facing an eviction, here is a site to help answer some questions https://tenantpowertoolkit.org/
[link]


2024.06.01 18:07 yogesh61 [Landlord US-NC] Advice on Handling Late-Paying Tenants and Potential Eviction

I have a rental property in North Carolina (Wake County) and my tenants have been consistently late with rent since 2023, though they eventually paid by year-end. They promised timely payments for 2024, but have continued to be late each month. My property manager sends eviction notices, but the tenants make partial payments to avoid eviction.
I’m torn between two options:
1. Continue sending eviction notices and not renew their lease when it expires in December 2024. 2. Reject their next payment and proceed with eviction now. 
Wake County is landlord-friendly, but evictions can still be delayed if tenants appeal. I’m in California, which adds a layer of complexity. Would appreciate any advice on which route to take.
submitted by yogesh61 to Landlord [link] [comments]


2024.06.01 00:59 Negative-Note-2862 How can I find out how many owners are in a LLC before it was sold? (New York City)

My father and his partner bought an LLC in 2019, and recently there is a person who claims that they were a partner and the company was sold without his knowledge (May 2024). The company owns a property which is a residential property and has a squatter and has been going back and fourth to court for eviction (since 2019). Obviously we did not collect any rental income and have been paying taxes of the property so the person who is squatting the house could leave. The case is still ongoing due to the squatter asking for extensions and a mistake from our attorney which caused the case to reset.
I ordered a Article of Organization from the State as it is the only document filed in public records prior to my father and his partner ownership. (Company was formed in November and we purchased it in December). The organizer name is the same as the person who sold the company that claimed that they were the sole owner of the company. I also have a Assignment of LLC Interest where the organizer signed and a line that states "The Assignor further resigns as sole member and the managing member of the Company immediately". With this new person claiming to be a part of my father and his friend LLC, he made a lease agreement with the squatter that has begun on February 1, 2024 and will end the lease on January 1st, 2025 with a monthly rent of $3,100 and pay in one lump sum of $37,200 by May 29, 2024. It also states that the tenant must pay $6,390.67 of water fines from DEP. The payments of the lease is to go to California to the third person who claims to be a partner without discussing with us. We had no idea of the lease agreement until 3 days ago and want to find out if that said person was a partner and why is he showing up now.
submitted by Negative-Note-2862 to legaladvice [link] [comments]


2024.06.01 00:44 oillotus Finally filed

Finally filed
https://preview.redd.it/x2l7c72ebu3d1.png?width=1484&format=png&auto=webp&s=4ba9b7172ce71b1996e566eff5c3c1d6f3ae0822
The post about her California eviction came up and reminded me of our search site in Oregon, so I looked her up. She filed on Monday.
submitted by oillotus to AcaciaKerseySnark [link] [comments]


2024.05.30 19:55 prayercenter Was her eviction already known?

I love looking up people in the court records to find tea. It’s publicly out there for the world to see.
I search up acacia and she had gotten evicted from the house she was renting in California for $2875 in unpaid rent and with all the court fees and damages she ended up being sued for a little over 8 thousand dollars lmfao
submitted by prayercenter to AcaciaKerseySnark [link] [comments]


2024.05.30 07:57 gildedgeek Unemployable at 56?

Sorry, but a bit of a rant here.
Despite having what I thought was a really good history and impressive resume - highly accomplished in technology and tech. marketing, worked on big projects and for a variety of clients and companies, published author - I can’t find work. I’m facing eviction!
I went through a horrible divorce a few years ago that took all my savings and destroyed my three small but profitable tech businesses. I had a young son (now 12), and I had to put everything in to keeping at least partial custody. Since then I’ve had to take whatever job I was offered, and despite having a lot of followers and contacts on LinkedIn, and scouring indeed and other sites, I can’t get a decent, long term job.
I’ve applied to several hundred positions where I think I’d be a great asset, but it seems from what I get back (if I get back any feedback at all) that I’m “overqualified” or I don’t fit the “company culture.” They want someone with “more recent experience” even if I’ve had years in the exact field. When I see who got the job in the end, it’s almost always someone who has much less experience, but is also 20-30 years younger.
Part of the issue is that I live on the central California coast, and I really don’t want to leave because of my son, but there is no work here. But still, there are thousands of remote jobs posted and I can’t get past the initial screening stage on most - generally the recruiters are like 26 years old and I look like their fathers!
Are others going through this? Is there any hope? I feel like I should be in my peak earning years and instead I’m circling the drain!
Anyway, end rant.
tl;dr - old guy learns he’s considered obsolete in an industry he helped create.
Edit: Wow! I guess I’m not alone! Thank you all for your advice and commiseration. Thus far, I’ve shortened my lifespan (on LinkedIn, at least) and am going to try the temp agencies.
Maybe we need to all get together and call ourselves the “Elder experts” or something. It’s not like the rules of business have changed, it’s just that in the current world it’s more about the way you look than the skills in your set or content of your character. Who wants to write up the press release!? ;)
Thanks again. GenX is the greatest generation, and I’m not at all biased!
submitted by gildedgeek to GenX [link] [comments]


2024.05.30 02:08 Endarkenment18 Does the standard eviction process apply in a situation?

I live in Anaheim California at my mother's senior community where I was her caretaker for many months until she recently passed away. My wife my 6 month old son and myself moved from our own place to stay with my mother to help her in her final days. My mother was on section 8 housing and have lived in the same senior community since 2016. We have been here on and off for the last year but for the last consecutive 90 days we have stayed without leaving. Can the senior community just put us out on the street? Or do they have to go through the standard eviction process like they would anybody else that's not on a lease. Only my mother was on the lease. I was just curious if the fact that it was a senior community and she was on section 8 housing that they can make us leave. Ca anybody help with this situation?
submitted by Endarkenment18 to Tenant [link] [comments]


2024.05.29 00:09 Lilldx3 60 days notice l

This takes place in California. My wife owns a small dog training and boarding company. Today the landlord of the facility gave her a 60 days notice to vacate due to complaints from neighboring businesses about parking availability as well as noise complaints. This is the first we have heard about these. I don’t see how parking is an issue since there is always 20-30 parking spaces available. The only issue we’ve had in the past that was brought up was about water runoff when she cleans the yard which we remedied. We have only been at this location about 2-3 months and our lease is for 1 year. I am currently overseas on a deployment and she’s been in the hospital for the last week and there aren’t any other affordable places in the area. What are my specific rights under a commercial lease? Also I know to be evicted in a residential lease they would need a court order due to the fact I am on deployment but I don’t know if that applies to commercial leases as well. Any and all help would be appreciated thank you!
submitted by Lilldx3 to legaladvice [link] [comments]


2024.05.28 23:18 devious_creecher a little wip headcanon map I made on the state of the wasteland as of the time of the show

Credit to MarcelusWalrus, who's Fallout Universe map was my point of reference for the placement of a lot of the factions on the map, this is also probably going to be a work in progress, which I'll update depending on both any suggestions or any new canon info that Bethesda releases, since I'm also trying to keep it all somewhat lore accurate to the best of our knowledge of said lore.
This is also largely just my ideas on the state of the ncr, so it's likely going to be much more detailed than most of the others, any ideas on what might flesh other groups out more are very welcome.
NCR: following their loss to the ruler of the strip, and subsequent evacuation, ncr troops returned home to find California in an even worse state, the capital was destroyed nearly exactly as the second battle for the dam took place, and it's destruction plus the armies defeat sent the already struggling ncr economy into a steep decline, seeking a solution, the reformed government attempted another, larger invasion of the mojave a few years later, which led to significant losses on both sides and ultimately another defeat.
This time, troops returned to a nation in near complete chaos. Shortages of food, water, and a now nearly worthless currency led to poverty and famine not seen since the founding of ncr, and riots over said famine, draft protests, and the resurgence of powerful raider gangs meant police and army forces were unable to keep order in many parts of the country, during this time, Brotherhood forces also began to re-emerge, defeating the scattered army in multiple battles. At this point desertion within the ncr military reached its all time high, with thousands of troops either going missing or being confirmed deserters, many of these soldiers would eventually end up forming their own gangs and petty warlord kingdoms within abandoned territories, with most becoming only slightly better than the raiders they were originally supposed to be fighting.
Eventually, the strain on the nation became too much, and the ncr began to officially withdraw from the southern states, with boneyard being one of the first, followed by almost every settlement, one by one, until the line finally held, the new border stretching from Navarro and the coast in the west to the Big Circle and Reno in the east. The ncr was gravely weakened due to its withdrawal, and lost both much of it's citizens as well as much of its industrial and commercial centers, despite this it has consolidated what it does have, and it's remaining cities are enough to keep it standing as one of the major powers of the west, albeit much less capable of its previous feats and ambitions
As of right now, the ncr is pursuing a policy largely of isolationism, and the ideas and ideals of figures like former senator Hanlon and Tandi hold great sway over the republic. Since the collapse the ncr had mainly been forced to focus its energy into rebuilding the north and solving the lingering issues of the food and water supply, and while it still boasts a comparatively formidable army, that army is strictly defensive, with no plans to fight back or reclaim territory being put in motion.
SHI EMPIRE: following the collapse of the ncr, the shi returned largely to a more isolationist stance on the outside world, shutting their gates and sealing San Francisco off from much of the outside world. Despite this, rumors persist about secret weapons deals with various wasteland groups, ranging from particularly influential warlords to the ncr itself, though this is not confirmed
THE HUB: following ncrs withdrawal from the south, the hub fell under the control of a coalition of caravan companies, local officials and army officers, and eventually managed to mitigate the damage of the collapse, soon returning to its role as a hub of trade for southern California, albeit with markedly less profit and stability, they are also one of the only places left in the south that are still in constant communication with ncr proper, with the hub maintaining telegraph lines between the powers in exchange for ncr goods and ammunition.
RENO: during the collapse, New Renos crime families declared independence from ncr, retaking official control over the city and forming a loose alliance to govern it, however this coalition quickly broke down, and the city is currently embroiled in a civil war between the Wrights, who also lead the remnants of the alliance, and the Van Graffs, who are attempting to seize complete control. So far the conflict has remained within the borders of the city and its surroundings, however ncr and Follower presence on the border has increased, both in response to a refugee crisis as well as the possibility of further escalation
WEST COAST BOS: following the decline of ncr, the brotherhood got the breathing space in the war it sorely needed, the west coasts elders and clerics needed only to wait for the ncr to continue to weaken, and following their second loss in Vegas, as well as news from the east of their victories and incoming reinforcements, the western brotherhood pushed back, retaking many of its lost bunkers and pushing ncr forces back. Currently it has merged with a large contingent of the east coast brotherhood, and brotherhood forces have been seen attacking a remnant warlord force in the boneyard area, though the exact reason for this is unknown
NCR REMNANT: largely regarded as a myth or hearsay, rumors persist about a large force of veteran rangers and soldiers who, upon receiving word or the retreat from Baja and later the south, remained in and defended the city of Dayglow, turning the city into a fortress, however due to the presence of multiple hostile groups and the lack of contact from the area, Dayglows remnants are regarded more as a conspiracy theory than an actual unit
WARLORD TERRITORY: warlord territory refers to the largely lawless stretches of former ncr land that have fallen into the control of small territorial groups, whether they be raider gangs, former army units, former brahmin barons, citizens militias or whoever else may have the incentive and manpower to claim territory, quality of life in these areas is still barely better than it was in the collapse, and wars, raids, and starvation are still commonplace, as well as the re-emergence of practices like slavery
NEW VEGAS: following the victory of the ruler of the strip over ncr, little is known in the wider west about the state of Vegas, though it would seem that progress was being made towards greater stability following ncrs retreat, this wouldn't last though, as the second ncr invasion began, and was met with extremely stiff resistance from the securitron army, as well as numerous local groups. Ultimately ncr troops managed to inflicted major casualties on the strip forces, even attacking and breaching the strip itself, and the damage done seems to have shattered Vegas as much as it did the ncr, leaving whatever plans its ruler had unfinished
THE LEGION: following their defeat at hoover dam, as well as the death of Caesar shortly after, the legion began to deteriorate and eventually dissolve, with many of its tribes returning to their former ways or what was left of them, the legion remains however, mainly in and around the capital of Flagstaff, though severely diminished, they have largely taken to ruling over or pillaging the reformed tribal groups and former ncr border settlements. Though many within the legion still hold Caesars ideals, none have been able to recapture what was broken when he died, and so the legion continues to decline.
LEGIO REGRESSUS: the name given by Legion to those who have returned to their former ways following the death of Caesar, vast swaths of the legions subjects attempted to return to their tribes roots, often to little success. Instead forming new tribes that are often completely antithetical to the legions ideals, this has led to the early beginnings of a confederation of tribes and villages that have proven to be a powerful force against the ambitions of the legion and groups like it, using legion tactics and weapons against them in response to slave raids and attempts at reintegration
GREAT KHANATE: following their move to Wyoming, the Khans formed a powerful nomadic empire based off the Mongols of old, so far little is known about their new society, though there have been reports of khan riders as far off as the california coast
EAST COAST BOS: the east coast brotherhood continues to reign as one of the major powers on the eastern seaboard, being the most powerful military force in the area, the commonwealth is the current headquarters of the high elder maxon, as well as his most trusted clerics, choosing it for its abundance of technical artifact over the comparatively safer capital wasteland, however pressure has been mounting for the elder to move once more, as the CPG at large has been becoming much less favorable towards the brotherhood, which it sees as overly protective of its tech and as overstepping its bounds far too frequently
COMMONWEALTH PROVISIONAL GOVERNMENT: following the destruction of the institute the minutemen, alongside the brotherhood and multiple prominent settlements reformed the CPG, a council of representatives from each group who would govern the commonwealth amd surrounding areas, since it's inception the cpg has grown by many settlements, and the minutemen have grown alongside it, developing a standing professional garrison in many major towns, though still relying on its militia as its major military force. Recently the cpg has begun to debate the brotherhoods place on the council, and many councilors are demanding an end to the confiscation of technology from their citizens, with many demanding a right to use force against such attempts or demanding an eviction of the brotherhood from their bases across the commonwealth.
submitted by devious_creecher to Fallout [link] [comments]


2024.05.28 22:24 Fluffy_Pirate_9514 [Tenant, Los Angeles, CA] Landlord spent security deposit and expects extra rent after lease ends - what are my rights?

My husband and I are moving out of a condo in California that we have rented for two consecutive annual leases.
Upon signing our first lease, our landlord required 4 months of rent up front, plus a two-month security deposit of $5,000.
When the initial lease was up, we re-signed another annual year lease, which ends at the end of this month.
Our lease states:
The term begins on 06/01/23 (“Commencement Date”). This Agreement shall terminate on 06/01/24 at 12:00 AM. Tenant shall vacate the Premises upon termination of the Agreement, unless the
(i) Landlord and Tenant have extended this Agreement in writing or signed a new agreement;
(ii) mandated by any rent increase cap or just cause eviction control under any state or local law;
or (iii) Landlord accepts Rent from Tenant (other than past due Rent), in which case a month-to-month tenancy shall be created which either party may terminate as specified in paragraph 2A.
2 weeks before the end of our lease, we notified our landlord in writing that we do not intend to renew. Prior to this, we never told her that we were planning on renewing. Honestly, we never see our landlord and for the most part have little correspondence with her. She never reached out to ask if we are renewing.
Regardless of the fact that our lease doesn’t state that we are required to provide 30-day notice, I believe it is the right thing to do — and I initially suggested to my husband that we pay her ~2 weeks additional prorated rent to ensure she is compensated for 30 days.
We notified our landlord 2-weeks in advance not out of inconsideration, but our new place came to us out of the blue, as a friend let us know that his house is available for rent and its a much better deal than what we are paying now.
When we notified our landlord that we will not be renewing, she complained that we should have told her sooner, because she needs to “prepare the security deposit” because she spent it.
She claims she was legally allowed to spend this money because she spent it on the condo.
When we moved into this condo, it hadn’t been cleaned. On our very first night here, the fridge broke and all of our food went bad. She promptly replaced the fridge.
Then, within a week, the dishwasher broke, and she replaced it.
She never told us that she was using our security deposit to pay for these replacements at the time. Regardless, I know that the total of the fridge and dishwasher was > $1,500… so that still leaves around $3,500 unaccounted for.
Otherwise, my husband has done all of the maintenance at our condo, and honestly, we are leaving this unit in a much better state than how it was when we moved in.
Our landlord told us that she will use the next tenants security deposit to pay us ours back.
So, with this all being said, I am not sure it would be wise to pay her any additional money when, a: we are not legally obliged b: she has admitted to spending our security deposit
People have been touring the unit, and she found new tenants.
However, she told us today that the tenants she found do not want to move in until the end of June, and that we “shouldn’t rush” so we don’t have to pay double rent.
We have already told her multiple times that we are actively moving our stuff out of this unit and that we will be fully moved into our new place by the end of the month.
So it is clear she is expecting another month of rent from us.
submitted by Fluffy_Pirate_9514 to Tenant [link] [comments]


2024.05.28 22:23 Fluffy_Pirate_9514 [Tenant, Los Angeles, CA] Landlord spent security deposit and expects extra rent after lease ends - what are my rights?

My husband and I are moving out of a condo in California that we have rented for two consecutive annual leases.
Upon signing our first lease, our landlord required 4 months of rent up front, plus a two-month security deposit of $5,000.
When the initial lease was up, we re-signed another annual year lease, which ends at the end of this month.
Our lease states:
The term begins on 06/01/23 (“Commencement Date”). This Agreement shall terminate on 06/01/24 at 12:00 AM. Tenant shall vacate the Premises upon termination of the Agreement, unless the
(i) Landlord and Tenant have extended this Agreement in writing or signed a new agreement;
(ii) mandated by any rent increase cap or just cause eviction control under any state or local law;
or (iii) Landlord accepts Rent from Tenant (other than past due Rent), in which case a month-to-month tenancy shall be created which either party may terminate as specified in paragraph 2A.
2 weeks before the end of our lease, we notified our landlord in writing that we do not intend to renew. Prior to this, we never told her that we were planning on renewing. Honestly, we never see our landlord and for the most part have little correspondence with her. She never reached out to ask if we are renewing.
Regardless of the fact that our lease doesn’t state that we are required to provide 30-day notice, I believe it is the right thing to do — and I initially suggested to my husband that we pay her ~2 weeks additional prorated rent to ensure she is compensated for 30 days.
We notified our landlord 2-weeks in advance not out of inconsideration, but our new place came to us out of the blue, as a friend let us know that his house is available for rent and its a much better deal than what we are paying now.
When we notified our landlord that we will not be renewing, she complained that we should have told her sooner, because she needs to “prepare the security deposit” because she spent it.
She claims she was legally allowed to spend this money because she spent it on the condo.
When we moved into this condo, it hadn’t been cleaned. On our very first night here, the fridge broke and all of our food went bad. She promptly replaced the fridge.
Then, within a week, the dishwasher broke, and she replaced it.
She never told us that she was using our security deposit to pay for these replacements at the time. Regardless, I know that the total of the fridge and dishwasher was > $1,500… so that still leaves around $3,500 unaccounted for.
Otherwise, my husband has done all of the maintenance at our condo, and honestly, we are leaving this unit in a much better state than how it was when we moved in.
Our landlord told us that she will use the next tenants security deposit to pay us ours back.
So, with this all being said, I am not sure it would be wise to pay her any additional money when, a: we are not legally obliged b: she has admitted to spending our security deposit
People have been touring the unit, and she found new tenants.
However, she told us today that the tenants she found do not want to move in until the end of June, and that we “shouldn’t rush” so we don’t have to pay double rent.
We have already told her multiple times that we are actively moving our stuff out of this unit and that we will be fully moved into our new place by the end of the month.
So it is clear she is expecting another month of rent from us.
submitted by Fluffy_Pirate_9514 to Landlord [link] [comments]


2024.05.28 22:20 Fluffy_Pirate_9514 Landlord spent security deposit and expects extra rent after lease ends - what are my rights?

My husband and I are moving out of a condo in California that we have rented for two consecutive annual leases.
Upon signing our first lease, our landlord required 4 months of rent up front, plus a two-month security deposit of $5,000.
When the initial lease was up, we re-signed another annual year lease, which ends at the end of this month.
Our lease states:
The term begins on 06/01/23 (“Commencement Date”). This Agreement shall terminate on 06/01/24 at 12:00 AM. Tenant shall vacate the Premises upon termination of the Agreement, unless the
(i) Landlord and Tenant have extended this Agreement in writing or signed a new agreement;
(ii) mandated by any rent increase cap or just cause eviction control under any state or local law; or
(iii) Landlord accepts Rent from Tenant (other than past due Rent), in which case a month-to-month tenancy shall be created which either party may terminate as specified in paragraph 2A.
2 weeks before the end of our lease, we notified our landlord in writing that we do not intend to renew. Prior to this, we never told her that we were planning on renewing. Honestly, we never see our landlord and for the most part have little correspondence with her. She never reached out to ask if we are renewing.
Regardless of the fact that our lease doesn’t state that we are required to provide 30-day notice, I believe it is the right thing to do — and I initially suggested to my husband that we pay her ~2 weeks additional prorated rent to ensure she is compensated for 30 days.
We notified our landlord 2-weeks in advance not out of inconsideration, but our new place came to us out of the blue, as a friend let us know that his house is available for rent and its a much better deal than what we are paying now.
When we notified our landlord that we will not be renewing, she complained that we should have told her sooner, because she needs to “prepare the security deposit” because she spent it.
She claims she was legally allowed to spend this money because she spent it on the condo.
When we moved into this condo, it hadn’t been cleaned. On our very first night here, the fridge broke and all of our food went bad. She promptly replaced the fridge.
Then, within a week, the dishwasher broke, and she replaced it.
She never told us that she was using our security deposit to pay for these replacements at the time. Regardless, I know that the total of the fridge and dishwasher was > $1,500… so that still leaves around $3,500 unaccounted for.
Otherwise, my husband has done all of the maintenance at our condo, and honestly, we are leaving this unit in a much better state than how it was when we moved in.
Our landlord told us that she will use the next tenants security deposit to pay us ours back.
So, with this all being said, I am not sure it would be wise to pay her any additional money when,
a: from my understanding, we are not legally obliged
b: she has admitted to spending our security deposit
People have been touring the unit, and she found new tenants.
However, she told us today that the tenants she found do not want to move in until the end of June, and that we “shouldn’t rush” so we don’t have to pay double rent.
We have already told her multiple times that we are actively moving our stuff out of this unit and that we will be fully moved into our new place by the end of the month.
So it is clear she is expecting another month of rent from us.
submitted by Fluffy_Pirate_9514 to legaladvice [link] [comments]


2024.05.28 19:44 Commercial_Ad537 Dangerous Housing Conditions Once the Homeless are Housed!

When a landlord fails to offer a tenant a lease and houses them in a substandard unit, several laws and statutes may be violated, depending on the jurisdiction. In New Mexico, the following laws and statutes are particularly relevant:

Violations of the Uniform Owner-Resident Relations Act (UORRA)

  1. **Implied Warranty of Habitability (N.M. Stat. Ann. § 47-8-20):**
  1. **Required Disclosures (N.M. Stat. Ann. § 47-8-22):**

Breach of Lease Agreement Requirements

  1. **Failure to Provide a Written Lease (N.M. Stat. Ann. § 47-8-33):**

Health and Safety Code Violations

  1. **Local Housing Codes:**

Tenant Rights and Protections

  1. **Retaliatory Eviction (N.M. Stat. Ann. § 47-8-39):**
  1. **Habitability Standards (N.M. Stat. Ann. § 47-8-24):**

Potential Legal Consequences

Case Studies

By understanding these laws and statutory requirements, tenants can better advocate for their rights and seek appropriate remedies when landlords fail to meet their legal obligations. If you need further assistance or have specific legal questions, consulting with a local attorney specializing in landlord-tenant law is recommended.
submitted by Commercial_Ad537 to homeless [link] [comments]


2024.05.28 17:29 Peacock-Shah-III The New Order of Cincinnatus National Convention of 1952 Peacock-Shah Alternate Elections

The New Order of Cincinnatus National Convention of 1952 Peacock-Shah Alternate Elections
“We must all hang together or we shall all hang separately.”
Thus quipped Benjamin Franklin as the American colonies joined against the tyranny of George III, the phrase hangs heavy in the imaginations of today’s political opposition. Laden with fears of violence, Chairman Osro Cobb of the Progressive-Federalist National Committee announced the cancellation of the party’s presidential primaries and the formal acquiescence of the party to the Committee for the Preservation of the Republic’s call for a joint presidential nominating convention with the American Liberty League. Yet, with the organization’s President Thomas Schall, once seen as the nearly prohibitive favorite for the nomination, dying in an unforeseen car accident and populist contender Eduardo Chibas taking his own life on live radio, the attempt to unite the opposition must find a candidate able to carry both banners in the face of Philip La Follette’s campaign for a third term.

Clare Boothe Luce waves to her supporters.
Major Candidates:
The following candidates are seen as frontrunners for the nomination.
Clare Boothe Luce: 49 year old Clare Boothe Luce of Connecticut rose to prominence as Henry Luce’s scandal-ridden yet massively popular First Lady, whose charisma would lead to a popular joke that every Luce voter wished they had voted for Clare despite widely known allegations of mutual marital infidelity. Marrying Henry after divorcing her first husband and entering high society as the author of an all-female play, Luce would become First Lady at the young age of 38 and soon emerge as a face of the American home front amidst the Third Pacific War. Describing the nation as having become a “dictatorial bumbledom,” Luce has echoed the anti-New State ethos of the party and is seen as the candidate of establishment conservatives. Criticizing the very slogan of President La Follette, she has argued that the United States cannot “win the peace” as it has not truly won the war until the defeat of international communism. Clare has supported the Zionist project in Alaska, a unified military command to replace the Department of Peace, and the creation of a defense pact among American allies in the Pacific as the centerpiece of an aggressively interventionist foreign policy declaring “if we are no longer willing to fight for it, our Christian democracy is finished." Yet, Luce has also opposed the creation of a stronger international United Nations to replace the powerless Parliament of Nations.
Driven to Catholicism in 1946 following the death of her daughter, even as her ex-president husband gallivanted about with a girlfriend a thousand miles from his wife’s baptism, Luce has emerged as a changed woman, reportedly abandoning her affairs and entering a career in electoral politics with her 1946 election to the Senate. Though Aaron Burr Houston maintained a private devotion to the Church of Rome, Clare has taken her faith with a zeal heretofore unseen in American politics, using the Senate as a pulpit to preach against “materialism” and a spiritual decline as the root of both communism and fascism, slyly suggesting that the rise of the Pentecostal, Immannuelite, and Mormon faiths has come hand-in-hand with the nation’s fascist surge as she has publicly wished that “the whole world would be Catholic.” Despite defenses from Presbyterian former President Luce, Clare’s faith has weakened her amongst convention delegates fearing the alienation of firmly Protestant voters. Yet her charm, wealth, and ability to attract millions in funding from backers such as Henry Ford II while winning key endorsements such as that of Richard Nixon has catapulted her to the front of the field.
W. Lee O’Daniel: 62 year old Senator W. Lee O’Daniel, better known as Pappy, rose to prominence in his late 20s as an architect of domestic policy during Aaron Burr Houston’s third term, being largely credited with the introduction of an old age pension system funded by a consumption tax. After making his way to the fore of Texas politics on his own through the integration of musical numbers and a widely popular radio show with his political antics, O’Daniel would turn from an upset gubernatorial defeat in the 1938 midterms to organizing Aaron Burr Houston’s campaign for a fourth term in the White House as the nation’s last hope against Charles Lindbergh. Accused by critics of puppeteering a dementia ridden 86 year old out of his own lust for power, O’Daniel would serve as Secretary of the Treasury for a year before being unceremoniously removed from the cabinet by Henry Luce for his critique of the American attack on Pearl Harbor and opposition to the draft, leaving him in political isolation as the Texan distinguished himself by demanding the execution of striking laborers as crucial to the war effort over his radio show.
A steadfast isolationist, O’Daniel’s foreign policy views have made him a favorite among Liberty League libertarians. Depicting himself as nearly as conservative as Luce on domestic issues with an isolationist foreign policy able to appeal to the Midwest, O’Daniel has emphasized ties to the legendary ABH and anti-alcohol views he claims can over the rural South. O’Daniel has also sought to use Luce’s Catholicism into an issue, seeking the support of Ben Gitlow through their shared membership in the Evangelical Christian Right. Yet, O’Daniel has been seen as the least committed among the candidates to the Committee’s pro-democracy ideals, while others question his fitness for office based on his eccentric manners as a cabinet Secretary and Senator, with Eleanor B. Roosevelt’s 1936 running mate Dan Moody remarking that “Pappy is as lost at the Treasury as I would be in a circus trapeze.
Lucius D. Clay: A distant relative of former President Henry Clay, 54 year old General of the Army turned banker Lucius D. Clay of Georgia has been the subject of a draft movement seeking to secure a candidate with the allure of a war hero after an attack on right wing generals such as Harold George, “some of whom are my own classmates,” accusing them of leading the party astray with the nomination of the ultra-conservative Benjamin Gitlow. Clay has portrayed himself as the candidate of order, supporting, as the others do, the prosecution of Blackshirts and the freeing of prosecuted opposition politicians. However, Clay, a former administrator of Lindbergh-era public works programs, is the only candidate to stop short of supporting the abolition of the New State, with backers instead focusing on the renowned administrative talent that led Douglas MacArthur to quip that Clay “could run General Motors or General Bradley’s army.” Despite his reticence to campaign at the convention, Clay’s moderation, vague platform, connections, and war hero status have won over a significant segment of delegates.
John Sampson Cooper: Named for martyred Admiral William T. Sampson not long after the First Pacific War dramatically ended with the Second Battle of Hawai’i, 50 year old Kentucky Senator John Sampson Cooper has led an underdog campaign of moderate liberals led by young activists Mark Hatfield and Chuck Mathias and Tannenbaum territorial delegate Jacob Javits. Returning home from Yale to find his father on his deathbed and his beloved Pulaski County burned to the ground amidst the Revolution, Cooper would be elected to county leadership at age 24, famously responding to a legal requirement that he evict the impoverished by personally paying their debts, earning the moniker “the poor man’s judge” as he emerged as a major figure in post-Revolutionary reconciliation in Kentucky. Returning home once more from service as a military attache in the Third Pacific War, Cooper would oust incumbent Farmer-Laborite Jerry Spencer in a 1944 upset, delaying taking his seat to serve as a legal advisor to hundreds of thousands of displaced Indonesians before emerging as a Senate leader in bringing the United States closer to India and other nations newly liberated from colonialism.
While eschewing the isolationism of O’Daniel, Cooper has demonstrated a far more relaxed stand on foreign policy than Luce, opposing aggressive anti-communism abroad while depicting the United States as a great mediator of peace in situations such as the violence in Palestine or partition of India. The reported favorite of Fulgencio Batista despite Cooper’s criticism of Batista as insufficiently committed to democracy, the Kentuckian has managed to maintain a widespread popularity with labor that has led many to speculate that Cooper would be the only candidate able to win the endorsement of organized labor and an imprisoned John L. Lewis. Lacking the celebrity draw of Senator Luce, Cooper has countered with a far more detailed platform, calling for the opening of American borders to the world’s refugees, massively increased federal aid to education, and, in stances that have left him anathema to many party conservatives, support for universal health insurance, coal subsidies, and public housing. A self admitted “truly terrible public speaker," Cooper’s political independence has won him the support of Will Rogers Jr. and made him a favorite of the modern liberal wing of the Liberty League.

Roy Acuff strikes up the band.
Minor Candidates:
The following have significant support, but lag behind the frontrunner candidates.
Luis A. Ferre: Among the most grim results of the 1948 elections emerged from the Caribbean, where states once considered the most loyally anti-Farmer-Labor in America crossed the aisle for the first time in history. With strategists seeing the path to the presidency running through the island states, many among the electorally minded have flocked to 48 year old Puerto Rico Senator Luis A. Ferre, publisher of the nation’s largest Spanish language newspaper, El Nuevo Dia. A classically trained pianist who has focused his senatorial career on securing funding for the arts, Ferre has referred to the United States as the “moral summit of the world,” while aligning himself in the middle on economic policy, calling for “addressing the inequalities of society” by selling off public land at a low price and supporting federal public housing with an emphasis on rural revitalization, in addition to a call for a 4% Christmas bonus on the grounds of the Jesus Amendment.
James A. Rhodes: "Every time I take a position on an issue, I lose two percent of the people. If I do that 50 times, I have everybody mad at me," the quip encapsulates the philosophy of 43 year old Ohio Governor James A. “Jim” Rhodes and his backers. Emerging as the favorite of many convention delegates who have argued that the best path forward for a united campaign is a steadfast focus on bread and butter issues, Rhodes has remarked that “there are only three issues in this campaign: jobs, jobs, and jobs,” and has argued that any anti-La Follette campaign must focus on people’s lives and the economy, not vague notions of democracy and American ideals. Born in the hills of Appalachia, Rhodes would be forced out of college after failing every class, only to work his way into the Mayoralty of Columbus, before unexpectedly catapulting himself to the Ohio Governorship before the age of 40, where he has governed with a moderate conservatism focused on local issues such as water rights and a program to "put a college education within 25 miles of every boy and girl” that has been praised as a national model.
Roy Acuff: 49 year old Roy Acuff of Tennessee was christened “The King of Country Music” for smash hits such as Wabash Cannonball, leading fellow musician Hank Williams to quip “book him and you don’t worry about crowds…for drawing power in the South, it’s Roy Acuff, then God.” Yet, after a rumor that Governor Buford Elington had labeled his music “disgraceful,” Acuff would embrace the label “king of the Hillbillies” in the 1948 election cycle to trade his acoustic throne for the Governor’s chair. Declaring that “any business must be put on a business plan, and so must a state government,” Acuff has cut the budget while requiring the Ten Commandments to be posted in government buildings, increasing state pensions, instituting a free school textbook program, cooperating with the La Follette Administration on the hydroelectric Tennessee Valley Authority, and has controversially called for additional restrictions on firearm ownership. Widely considered a possible frontrunner for his celebrity status if a primary were to have been held, Acuff has supported O’Daniel at the convention, yet has evasively refused to disavow a draft movement arising from his pro-union sympathies that many suspect could bring Fulgencio Batista into the fold alongside John L. Lewis, Jimmy Hoffa, and the opposition Farmer-Laborites.
Henry S. Breckinridge: The only member of the Liberty League at the fore of presidential consideration, 66 year old New York Congressman Henry Skillman Breckinridge ran alongside Al Capone in 1936 in the campaign that doomed the Commonwealth alliance, but has reinvented his career since by working to ally Federalist and Liberty League causes against La Follette and serving as the organization’s House leader. Advocating a heavily internationalist vision in line somewhere between that of Cooper and Luce, Breckinridge’s commitment to small government classical liberalism and a strict construction of the constitution has made him the favorite of Liberty League loyalists and some party conservatives. However, it is considered unlikely for a Liberty League member to win outright due to Progressive-Federalists comprising a majority of convention delegates.
Eleanor Butler Roosevelt: 63 year old former President Eleanor Butler Roosevelt was promoted for the nomination for months by her former counsel turned the “voice of impeachment,” Richard Nixon, who has noted that her re-election would have stopped the rise of fascism in its tracks. However, content with retirement, the writing of her memoirs, and the promotion of Nixon’s career, Roosevelt has categorically refused to seek the presidency. Nonetheless, she is expected to receive votes on the convention’s opening ballot from admirers.

Richard Nixon with the California delegation.
The Convention:
District of Columbia police scattered the Immanuelites, holding fliers declaring that their savior had prophesied nuclear armageddon on October 3rd of 1952, but they did not touch the Blackshirts. Ominously, they milled about in the blocks surrounding the convention, brandishing small arms and chants for Phil, as, within, the national convention of the Committee for the Preservation of the Republic proceeded without the pomp and circumstance conventions thrive in, a veil of despair lying over the nearly two thousand delegates in the plaza as they longed from their windows for days past. Further, a rule requiring two thirds of the convention for nomination, instituted by Liberty Leaguers fearful of a tyranny of the majority, would practically guarantee balloting periods stretching long into the night.
The first ballot would open with a surprise, as Roy Acuff rose to rebuff the acolytes of Fulgencio Batista. Pointing to the imprisoned Cuba Governor’s permissive policies towards gambling and prostitution, Acuff would draw a firm line between his pro-labor Christian conservatism and the “moral and political corruption” of Governor Batista. With the vociferousness of the singer’s vituperations and an unexpected willingness to attack Batista personally where other candidates stood largely silent, Acuff would find himself winning extensive support. With the rise of Roy Acuff splintering Pappy O’Daniel’s support, the former Secretary of the Treasury would find himself performing unexpectedly weakly, the beginning of a hemorrhage that would see his support move to Acuff in the first several rounds of balloting. Meanwhile, Clare Boothe Luce would take a lead out of the gate, but soon find that the collapse of Pappy O'Daniel's campaign following a wholesale defection to Acuff would lead other O'Daniel backers to rally behind Clay as an electable alternative. With Luce's lead dwindling, Cooper would swiftly capture her momentum, driving her to second place as a draft movement for Eleanor Butler Roosevelt peeled off dozens more Luce votes.

Ballot 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Lucius D. Clay 512 513 549 601 632 637 656
Clare Boothe Luce 646 641 619 599 529 515 514
John Sampson Cooper 277 282 308 310 366 368 369
Roy Acuff 46 101 112 165 187 188 170
Pappy O'Daniel 351 299 247 143 89 88 87
James A. Rhodes 58 58 58 58 58 58 58
Luis A. Ferre 42 42 43 42 43 44 46
Eleanor B. Roosevelt 1 1 1 19 31 38 38
Henry Skillman Breckinri-dge 21 21 21 21 19 17 15
With 1,310 delegates necessary to win the nomination, another half dozen rounds of balloting would bring no candidate anywhere near the necessary supermajority. Luce delegates would fiercely resist the rise of Lucius D. Clay, with Luce's manager Walter Judd and friend Anna Chennault illicitly spreading pamphlets accusing the General of being a plant of the regime to take control of the opposition. Yet, with his eyes on leading a reformed State Department, Pappy O'Daniel would stand back as his collapsing campaign gave its strength to Lucius D. Clay. Flatlining after several ballots with delegates consternated at the unwillingness of their chieftain to actively rally them, Roy Acuff's support would soon begin to bolt to Cooper and Clay, leaving Cooper to peak on the 11th ballot. However, a core of loyalist Acuff delegates would hold back the Kentuckian's momentum, as Lucius D. Clay covered ever closer to a majority. Yet, Clay would find himself having exhausted every avenue, with Acuff delegates reluctant to switch, and the block of Cooper and Luceites unwilling to come to the table. Further, a movement would begin to circumvent the squabbles of the major candidates and nominate General Curtis LeMay, the young face of the Pacific War. Yet, LeMay's role in the atomic bombings of millions of Japanese civilians would leave Senator Will Rogers Jr. to implore the convention not to proceed with the General as a compromise.

Ballot 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Lucius D. Clay 659 661 692 712 739 744 744
Clare Boothe Luce 514 513 512 512 513 516 516
John Sampson Cooper 368 392 397 439 438 435 433
Roy Acuff 168 144 141 99 71 61 61
Pappy O'Daniel 83 81 28 8 2 2 3
James A. Rhodes 58 58 58 58 58 58 58
Luis A. Ferre 46 47 61 61 61 61 65
Eleanor B. Roosevelt 45 45 45 45 48 48 47
Henry Skillman Breckinri-dge 10 9 7 6 5 4 2
Curtis LeMay 1 2 12 13 13 13 13
The Convention would lock itself in deadlock as three ballots passed. The night as black as the shirts of the threatening bystanders, it would become clear that, with neither's supporters willing to concede to the other, neither Clay nor Luce would prevail. From Haitian Senator Elie Lescot to Convention Chair S.I. Hayakawa and General Claire Chennault, delegates would attempt to draft a compromise. On friendly terms with Luce and Clay alike, Chennault would nearly prevail, yet his dogged loyalty to the Liberalism of his youth would hold back his chances. The Liberals could veto a candidate, but they could never nominate one. Yet, Chennault would telegraph his wife Anna with a suggestion, a protege of his whose famed dogfights over the Pacific and haughty demeanor had bought him fame. A protege drummed out of his beloved Air Force for opposing the "Bomber Mafia" consensus of Curtis LeMay only to purchase a baseball team. A protege who survived eight airplaine crashes. A protege who had once been an aid to Hugh S. Johnson and who counts Charles Lindbergh among his friends, but who donated to the re-election campaign of "the voice of impeachment," Representative Nixon. A protege married to the heir to the Pulitzer fortune and media empire. A protege by the name of Elwood R. Quesada, but better known to friend and foe alike as "Pete." Bankers Fred Akers and George Garrett, friends of the dashing commander, would throw themselves in pre-organizing on his behalf, hiring demonstrators to spark what seemed an almost spontaneous movement.
Kate Quesada, once the young Kate Pulitzer who had defied high society to marry a hot tempered Major League Baseball player turned fighter pilot, would awake her husband before dawn to inform him that Professor Chennault from his Academy days had entered his name to be nominated for President of the United States, with delegate Milton Eisenhower casting the first vote. In the Convention's recess between the 16th and 17th ballots, Anna would go about printing hundreds of "Can't Beat Pete!" buttons, while working behind the scenes among those such as the Ohio delegation, long loyal to Jim Rhodes, winning second choice. Most importantly, she would win over Richard Nixon among the Luce delegates and Jimmie Davis among the supporters of Clay, portraying Quesada as capturing the party platform while holding the war hero's mystique. Taking things a step further, Chennault would pitch the ex-General as a moderate, a liberal, and a conservative at variance, refusing to let policy distract her from her central argument: the 48-year-old Quesada could win, Clay and Luce had proven they couldn't. The 18th ballot would see the deadlock broken as hundreds of supporters abandoned Luce and Clay alike for Quesada, by the 19th, Clay and Luce themselves would step back from their campaigns. With Luce admiring tales of Quesada's pre-flight rosaries and Clay on friendly terms, both would accept the compromise as supporters of the minor candidates such as Ferre and Rhodes rallied behind him. On the 20th ballot, with other candidates excepting Cooper falling behind Quesada, he would win the nomination, narrowly surpassing the 2/3 requirement before a motion to declare his nomination unanimous on the 21st ballot.
Ballot 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Pete Quesada 0 0 1 368 734 1,379 1,954
Lucius D. Clay 744 744 743 503 402 98 0
Clare Boothe Luce 519 517 513 489 365 101 0
John Sampson Cooper 430 427 407 387 354 355 0
Roy Acuff 57 57 56 49 49 11 0
Pappy O'Daniel 3 3 3 3 3 3 0
James A. Rhodes 58 58 58 58 0 0 0
Luis A. Ferre 65 69 86 46 46 0 0
Eleanor B. Roosevelt 47 46 49 48 3 0 0
Henry Skillman Breckinri-dge 2 2 3 3 3 1 0
Curtis LeMay 13 12 12 1 0 0 0
Claire Chenault 2 3 3 1 0 0 0
S.I. Hayakawa 1 1 3 3 1 1 0
Elie Lescot 1 1 1 1 0 0 0
Louisiana Governor and former country musician Jimmie Davis, famous for "You Are My Sunshine," would come in third to S.I. Hayakawa, with California Senator Will Rogers a narrow second. Yet, many would worry that Hayakawa's Japanese ancestry would risk racist attacks so soon after the Third Pacific War, even as Americans reconciled with the now fallen sun across the ocean. Hayakawa's chances would be further weakened with the remark that “I would encourage insurrection in those poor crushed countries that have been under tyranny all these years.” Further, the death of Rogers' father by a fascist bomb and his military service would be contrasted with Davis's lack of either to paint Rogers as more compatible with the theme of a heroic ticket to rescue the nation from fascism. With the eccentric linguist's support set back, Hayakawa would endorse Rogers in the name of party unity, securing the Senator a third ballot victory despite significant support for Jimmie Davis across the South. Thus, at four o'clock in the morning on August 14th of 1952, the Committee for the Preservation of the Republic would adjourn its first national convention.
Senator Will Rogers Jr. of California, Cincinnatus nominee for the Vice Presidency.
Ballot 1 2 3
Will Rogers Jr. 838 947 1,329
S.I. Hayakawa 906 801 4
Jimmie Davis 209 208 523
Happy Chandler 1 1 1

A DC native, Pete Quesada would be in the convention hall at ten as it convened anew, meeting kingmakers and strutting through mobs of delegates as the party considered a series of resolutions on names. With a breakaway group led by legal Chairman Frank Chodorov suing the merger faction of the Liberty League, affiliated delegates would vote near unanimously to drop the title in favor of christening themselves anew with the old moniker of Liberal. Further, in an attempt to stress the status of the Preservationist nominee as a military hero, the convention would vote to adopt for its presidential ticket, and presidential ticket only, the partisan line of "Cincinnatus," after the New Order of Cincinnatus operating among oppositionists in Washington state and Alabama, and, of course, the Roman statesman who transformed his swords into plowshares after a brief tenure as leader of his republic in a time of crisis. With every delegate declared a member, the New Order of Cincinnatus would go national as the campaign vehicle of the Quesada and Rogers ticket.
A narrower vote would approve the use of the name "Law Preservation Party" for those candidates running without Progressive or Liberal affiliation.
Further, the party would approve a short platform, rejecting a suggestion from Quesada to enshrine an age limit for holding office while vowing:
  • First and foremost, to recognize no political principle other than the Constitution of the country, the Union of the states, and the enforcement of the law.
    • To bring about a renaissance in politics and to promote a Spartan-like devotion to honesty, cleanliness, efficiency, and economy in government.
    • To clean out graft, corruption, and hypocrisy in our public offices.
    • To modernize state, county, and local government and to eliminate all duplicating phases thereof.
    • To eliminate waste in governmental machinery and to work for a substantial reduction in the tax burden the average taxpayer is forced to bear.

Elwood R. \"Pete\" Quesada in flight gear after a demonstration of his aeronautical prowess to eager delegates.
With the end of procedural matters, Pete Quesada would rise to the stage for the first time, a handful of cheers greeting him. Omar Bradley once wrote that the dashing young Air Force General "could have passed for a prototype of the hot pilot, with his shiny green trousers, broad easy smile, and crumpled yet jaunty hat, but he was a brilliant, hard, and daring air-support commander on the ground," and his youthful smile upheld that characterization today, yet his face would soon turn grave as he began.
I think a military officer, regardless of what service he’s in, is improved if he handles unusual assignments...I look forward to being assigned by the American people to the White House! I believe every person has been put on this Earth for just one purpose—to serve his fellow man. It doesn’t matter how he does this. He can build a bridge, paint a picture, invent a labor-saving gadget, or run a gas station. The point is, he should try to leave the Earth a better place than he found it. If he does, his life will have been worthwhile. If he doesn’t do what he can within his own limitations, he is destined to be unhappy.” Comparing himself to his longtime friend Lindbergh, Quesada would continue with a chuckle, saying that “I'll have something to bounce off Lindy whenever he boasts too much about that little term he served.”
Promising without elaboration to defend “integrity, Americanism, fiscal responsibility, and courage,” Quesada would speak on foreign policy, declaring that the United States had won a war on tyranny, and that “Korea remembers. Indonesia remembers. The Philippines remember..to abandon them is to tell the Free World that they cannot depend on the United States.” Further, he would note that while "“I abhor war," he stands firm in a belief that "we can maintain peace only through strength.
Moving to domestic matters, Quesada would claim that “a government is the servant, not the master,” declaring that “Fascism has been wasted effort...middle class, sincere decent people, need to regain the influence they’ve lost over the past decades," while arguing that “there are too many intellectuals in government who have no experience in management in which the majority’s will is to be followed.” Quesada would accuse the government of being led by “men of limited imagination" and “those who postponed making decisions," promising to “weed out the incapable and inefficient." Then, in a tacit move of comparison between the man the convention styled as a latter day Cincinnatus and the incumbent dynamo who had energized so many Blackshirts, Quesada would declare that "the more I see the more I realize there is a difference between men.
Quesada would turn to the party's past failures and shock many delegates by placing them directly at the feet of the opposition itself, claiming that "an examination of these failures reveals contributory negligence on the part of ourselves, discord and a lack of confidence in our forces.” The convention looked on with bated breath as Pete Quesada, infuriated by the fear among the delegates assembled, raised his voice for the shouted words that have entered immortality as the most famous words of his campaign, screaming from his microphone into millions of American homes and newspaper headlines that:
"Our whole country is stopped by a tinpot dictator that tossed a few dozen of us into jail! Follow the light which leads to truth and we will prevail, history will show we saved the day...
THE ONLY THING WE HAVE TO FEAR IS FEAR ITSELF!"

\"THE ONLY THING WE HAVE TO FEAR IS FEAR ITSELF!\"
submitted by Peacock-Shah-III to Presidentialpoll [link] [comments]


2024.05.28 15:52 devious_creecher My personal headcanon map for the state of the fallout world as of the time of the show. Let me know anything I missed

Credit to MarcelusWalrus, who's Fallout Universe map was my reference for the placement of a lot of the factions on the map, this is also probably going to be a work in progress, which I'll update depending on both any suggestions or any new canon info that Bethesda releases, since I'm also trying to keep it all somewhat lore accurate to the best of our knowledge of said lore.
This is also largely my ideas on the state of the ncr, so it's likely going to be much more detailed than most of the others, any ideas on what might flesh other groups out more are very welcome.
NCR: following their loss to the ruler of the strip, and subsequent evacuation, ncr troops returned home to find California in an even worse state, the capital was destroyed nearly exactly as the second battle for the dam took place, and it's destruction plus the armies defeat sent the already struggling ncr economy into a steep decline, seeking a solution, the reformed government attempted another, larger invasion of the mojave a few years later, which led to significant losses on both sides and ultimately another defeat.
This time, troops returned to a nation in near complete chaos. Shortages of food, water, and a now nearly worthless currency led to poverty and famine not seen since the founding of ncr, and riots over said famine, draft protests, and the resurgence of powerful raider gangs meant police and army forces were unable to keep order in many parts of the country, during this time, Brotherhood forces also began to re-emerge, defeating the scattered army in multiple battles. At this point desertion within the ncr military reached its all time high, with thousands of troops either going missing or being confirmed deserters, many of these soldiers would eventually end up forming their own gangs and petty warlord kingdoms within abandoned territories, with most becoming only slightly better than the raiders they were originally supposed to be fighting.
Eventually, the strain on the nation became too much, and the ncr began to officially withdraw from the southern states, with boneyard being one of the first, followed by almost every settlement, one by one, until the line finally held, the new border stretching from Navarro and the coast in the west to the Big Circle and Reno in the east. The ncr was gravely weakened due to its withdrawal, and lost both much of it's citizens as well as much of its industrial and commercial centers, despite this it has consolidated what it does have, and it's remaining cities are enough to keep it standing as one of the major powers of the west, albeit much less capable of its previous feats and ambitions
As of right now, the ncr is pursuing a policy largely of isolationism, and the ideas and ideals of figures like former senator Hanlon and Tandi hold great sway over the republic. Since the collapse the ncr had mainly been forced to focus its energy into rebuilding the north and solving the lingering issues of the food and water supply, and while it still boasts a comparatively formidable army, that army is strictly defensive, with no plans to fight back or reclaim territory being put in motion.
SHI EMPIRE: following the collapse of the ncr, the shi returned largely to a more isolationist stance on the outside world, shutting their gates and sealing San Francisco off from much of the outside world. Despite this, rumors persist about secret weapons deals with various wasteland groups, ranging from particularly influential warlords to the ncr itself, though this is not confirmed
THE HUB: following ncrs withdrawal from the south, the hub fell under the control of a coalition of caravan companies, local officials and army officers, and eventually managed to mitigate the damage of the collapse, soon returning to its role as a hub of trade for southern California, albeit with markedly less profit and stability, they are also one of the only places left in the south that are still in constant communication with ncr proper, with the hub maintaining telegraph lines between the powers in exchange for ncr goods and ammunition.
RENO: during the collapse, New Renos crime families declared independence from ncr, retaking official control over the city and forming a loose alliance to govern it, however this coalition quickly broke down, and the city is currently embroiled in a civil war between the Wrights, who also lead the remnants of the alliance, and the Van Graffs, who are attempting to seize complete control. So far the conflict has remained within the borders of the city and its surroundings, however ncr and Follower presence on the border has increased, both in response to a refugee crisis as well as the possibility of further escalation
WEST COAST BOS: following the decline of ncr, the brotherhood got the breathing space in the war it sorely needed, the west coasts elders and clerics needed only to wait for the ncr to continue to weaken, and following their second loss in Vegas, as well as news from the east of their victories and incoming reinforcements, the western brotherhood pushed back, retaking many of its lost bunkers and pushing ncr forces back. Currently it has merged with a large contingent of the east coast brotherhood, and brotherhood forces have been seen attacking a remnant warlord force in the boneyard area, though the exact reason for this is unknown
NCR REMNANT: largely regarded as a myth or hearsay, rumors persist about a large force of veteran rangers and soldiers who, upon receiving word or the retreat from Baja and later the south, remained in and defended the city of Dayglow, turning the city into a fortress, however due to the presence of multiple hostile groups and the lack of contact from the area, Dayglows remnants are regarded more as a conspiracy theory than an actual unit
WARLORD TERRITORY: warlord territory refers to the largely lawless stretches of former ncr land that have fallen into the control of small territorial groups, whether they be raider gangs, former army units, former brahmin barons, citizens militias or whoever else may have the incentive and manpower to claim territory, quality of life in these areas is still barely better than it was in the collapse, and wars, raids, and starvation are still commonplace, as well as the re-emergence of practices like slavery
NEW VEGAS: following the victory of the ruler of the strip over ncr, little is known in the wider west about the state of Vegas, though it would seem that progress was being made towards greater stability following ncrs retreat, this wouldn't last though, as the second ncr invasion began, and was met with extremely stiff resistance from the securitron army, as well as numerous local groups. Ultimately ncr troops managed to inflicted major casualties on the strip forces, even attacking and breaching the strip itself, and the damage done seems to have shattered Vegas as much as it did the ncr, leaving whatever plans its ruler had unfinished
THE LEGION: following their defeat at hoover dam, as well as the death of Caesar shortly after, the legion began to deteriorate and eventually dissolve, with many of its tribes returning to their former ways or what was left of them, the legion remains however, mainly in and around the capital of Flagstaff, though severely diminished, they have largely taken to ruling over or pillaging the reformed tribal groups and former ncr border settlements. Though many within the legion still hold Caesars ideals, none have been able to recapture what was broken when he died, and so the legion continues to decline.
LEGIO REGRESSUS: the name given by Legion to those who have returned to their former ways following the death of Caesar, vast swaths of the legions subjects attempted to return to their tribes roots, often to little success. Instead forming new tribes that are often completely antithetical to the legions ideals, this has led to the early beginnings of a confederation of tribes and villages that have proven to be a powerful force against the ambitions of the legion and groups like it, using legion tactics and weapons against them in response to slave raids and attempts at reintegration
GREAT KHANATE: following their move to Wyoming, the Khans formed a powerful nomadic empire based off the Mongols of old, so far little is known about their new society, though there have been reports of khan riders as far off as the california coast
EAST COAST BOS: the east coast brotherhood continues to reign as one of the major powers on the eastern seaboard, being the most powerful military force in the area, the commonwealth is the current headquarters of the high elder maxon, as well as his most trusted clerics, choosing it for its abundance of technical artifact over the comparatively safer capital wasteland, however pressure has been mounting for the elder to move once more, as the CPG at large has been becoming much less favorable towards the brotherhood, which it sees as overly protective of its tech and as overstepping its bounds far too frequently
COMMONWEALTH PROVISIONAL GOVERNMENT: following the destruction of the institute the minutemen, alongside the brotherhood and multiple prominent settlements reformed the CPG, a council of representatives from each group who would govern the commonwealth amd surrounding areas, since it's inception the cpg has grown by many settlements, and the minutemen have grown alongside it, developing a standing professional garrison in many major towns, though still relying on its militia as its major military force. Recently the cpg has begun to debate the brotherhoods place on the council, and many councilors are demanding an end to the confiscation of technology from their citizens, with many demanding a right to use force against such attempts or demanding an eviction of the brotherhood from their bases across the commonwealth.
submitted by devious_creecher to ImaginaryFallout [link] [comments]


2024.05.28 15:33 hippysol3 [Landlord, CA, General] I broke my own vetting rules and now Im going to pay $3300 for it.

Edit: CA as in Canada, not California.
Been in this game for 35 years and have had my share of bad tenants. So I have a VERY strict vetting procedure developed over years. Unfortunately I accepted a couple that seemed good, but not great. I think if Im honest it was because the gf was charmingly funny, witty and a very good communicator and that made me overlook a couple of red flags and I got conned.
One was that the bf had a terrible credit score. He has over $800 owing on utility bills from a few years ago and of course they had some cock and bull story about how it was the landlords fault.
The second was that they talked negatively about their last landlord and I should know that means they're going to think Im terrible too. That landlord gave them a good reference when I called her, but now Im sure she was lying to get rid of them. I should call her back and ask her the real story.
The third was that the bf hesitated when I asked him if he smoked and he said he only liked having a cigarette when he had "a beer" after work. He failed to mention that he likes having "a beer" a lot. They're smart enough not to smoke in the house but after 3 weeks my garage smells like a dive bar with booze and cigarettes.
Turns out he doesnt just smoke cigarettes either. Not all weed smokers are bad tenants but all bad tenants smoke weed. I dont care what anyone says about it being legal here, weed smokers have been a real pain in the ass for me.
I feel like an idiot. I KNOW better but I ignored the signs and was happy to get a new tenant who is paying considerably higher rent than the one who left. I wasnt even rushing - it took me weeks to find them after rejecting quite a few others. Just a dumb decision.
He's just been arrested for assaulting their (unapproved) roommate after a screaming match with his gf on the back lawn at 5 am. Neighbors must be thrilled. Third argument in as many weeks and the gf has been waking up the bsmt tenants with her screaming and his loud banging around, who knows what he was doing but Im sure it wasnt good.
I called an eviction specialist and its going to cost me $1000 to get them removed in 2 to 3 weeks (thank god its fairly fast here) plus the loss of $2300 in rent that they're highly unlikely to pay in 4 days. Oh and their share of the utilities is another 200. Ug. Just sickening.
Ive had one other violent tenant evicted in my career and it isnt worth the stress to do it myself. That guy was dangerous, destroyed my newly renovated house, Im sure this one is no better and I fully expect he will go apeshit and wreck things in my house. They've only been there one month and in this super tight market they will have a helluva time finding another rental but thats not my problem, Im just hoping to get the house back in one piece.
Ironically I went out of my way to get new appliances in for this couple that involved driving hundreds of kms to get a special set that is so heavy I had to hire help just to get them up the stairs and installed, all because she likes to work in the kitchen. And I approved their dog with no additional fees cause the dog is adorable and I love dogs. I want the dog to stay and her loser owners to get out lol
Expensive mistake. But I guess I needed a refresher course in how to pick losers.
Dont be me. Be fussy.
submitted by hippysol3 to Landlord [link] [comments]


2024.05.28 02:13 Successful_Bag3832 I’ve posted a few times in different subreddits. I need help

Bullet points • delusional foster child • dissociative nature as a child so reality wasn’t really reality. I saw the world very differently than most people my age • I always felt like I could never be enough for the foster parents I had stayed with permanently. • constantly failed, I was a smart kid but there was always something missing. Not there. •Going through school was like hell. I didnt relate to anyone, I was smart and fairly strong and involved in sports but no one seemed to want to be my friend. • After high school I joined the military because they said the relationships you make is similar to a family bond and I’ve always wanted to be understood by people and be able to be close to them at the same time. •the military went well in the beginning, then I got in a fight because this guy was drunk and hit a woman. I pretty much snowballed from there. Got my self in the Seperations as I felt like a failure. This was a year and a half process where I made some life changing decisions. •I got married-she went to California- I stayed where I was. My mental health got overwhelmingly bad so I went awol and then that turned into desertion. • my wife had a miscarriage, not a good one, •we almost crashed off a cliff, would have killed both of us. • I turned myself in to the military and then went deserter again and hired and attorney to get me separated officially. (I was terrified of law enforcement for about a year) • my ex wasn’t paying rent and doing whatever else with the money we had, got evicted. •watched the love of my life fall out of love with me . •tried to do everything in my power to gain back her love and for once not be a failure. • moved to Virginia, Newport News,I had a military friend that was going to let me stay there to make some money and hopefully get my finances together to buy a house and when she got out she could move down. She had also hit rock bottom and we were both definitely struggling but all in all we got a divorce. I hit ROCK BOTTOM. • I got hit by a car, walked 10 miles everyday to get to and from work during any weather • I got addicted to drugs and my depression. •moved out of Newport and to Norfolk ( it’s a bit nicer) • after trucking life homeless and couch surfing in sorority’s by tinder and bumble while holding a good enough paying job I got an apartment with an Actual trust worthy friend. • I am now about 2 years post divorce still in love though I understand that she doesn’t • I work as a vape shop manager and a prep cook at a restaurant, I’m attending a tattoo school in 5 months to pursue my dream of being amongst the great tattoo artists as well as enjoy life.
I am severely depressed life is not even mundane I feel as if I am always cold and dizzy I think about my ex and days have already gone by since the beginning of the thought.
Thank you if you’ve read this whole thing I hope you aren’t feeling this kind of hole that sucks everything in you out as well
submitted by Successful_Bag3832 to mentalillness [link] [comments]


2024.05.27 22:13 Competitive-Pie-8247 Lease is up in 5 days, landlord gives a renewal with new clauses at the last minute

(California)
Hi,
Our landlord just shared with us a renewal lease notice with new clauses, including a tenant protection act (TPA) exemption notice, telling us we have three days to sign (during memorial weekend), while our lease expires in 4 days. We're not able to get legal support as this is a holiday, and we're not willing to sign because the automatic month-to-month would offer us more legal protection as we would still be covered by TPA.
They claim that the renewal lease is materially the same as before while it does contain changes (including a rent increase), and that not signing in time would be considered a refusal. It's seems a shady way to evict us under the tenant protection law, but I couldn't find any Californian law specifying how much of a notice a landlord has to give for a lease renewal. I'm saying "shady" because the landlord initially tried to tell us, 20 days ago, to vacate the premises at the end of our lease, and we told them that we needed more time to find a place, and would go month to month as authorized by TPA. They weren't aware of the law then, but are now trying to find ways around, rather than accepting a month to month tenancy. There's no just cause involved, all of our payments have been made in time.
TL;DR :
submitted by Competitive-Pie-8247 to legaladvice [link] [comments]


2024.05.27 02:27 PRINCYN EVICTION QUESTIONS

We aren't behind in rent. We're renting a room from a lady and she just flipped out on us and wants us to leave. I've tried talking to her to tell her we don't mind moving we just need a little time to get the money together and find a place. I really don't want an eviction on my record just because this lady won't give me time to find a place to go. She's also made living in her home next to unbearable by making false police reports turing off utilities, no longer allowing us to use the bathroom, shower, kitchen, laundry or parking. She actually had one of our cars towed after we paid her to park in the driveway. She forged her old bankruptcy lawyers paperwork saying he severed us with a 30day notice to move. She tells us that we are tresspassing and squatters but she lives in the home too, moved her stuff out of the room so we could move ours in and gave us keys & we pay her rent & even gave her extra money when her account was frozen due to defaulting on a judgement. We've helped her with chores around her home. She has filed false civil cases for elder abuse on people in order to force them to leave her property. She's got 3 PAGES worth of civil cases against various people, all have been dismissed/unfounded. We served her with a Cease and Desist letter to ask her to stop harassing us. It was after that we we're given the Unlawful Detainer. My question is, is what she's doing legal? We've been paying her rent, helping around her home and she's just all of a sudden flipped on us. Is what she's doing legal? we aren't late on rent and we have a month to month agreement with her. We live in California.
submitted by PRINCYN to legaladvice [link] [comments]


2024.05.25 22:50 Competitive-Pie-8247 CA Landlord wants to include Tenant Protection Exemption Notice in new lease, am I forced to sign ?

Hi,
I've been having a few issue recently as my lease is expiring soon, and the landlord was expecting us to leave as soon as the lease ended, and they told us only 20 days before expiration that the lease wouldn't be renewed. As we're covered by the California's tenant protection, we told them that this wasn't legal. They need just cause and 60 days (been renting here for >1 year).
Now, as the end of the month approaches and they finally took a look the law, they are offering us two options :
They gave us two days to decide, our lease expiring in 5 days. If we don't choose anything, they will treat it as refusal, and could potentially argue for an eviction. To my understanding, we are allowed to refuse the new lease as it is materially different from the original, since it includes the TPA notice of exemption, so it's within our right to decide not to sign the new lease and automatically enter a month to month tenancy.
Q1 : is correct, or is TPA notice of exemption not a material change when it's added to a lease?
Q2 : Is it allowed for them to give us such a short amount of time to sign a new lease (sent a Friday, expects and answer by Tuesday), 5 days before our lease expiration.
Q3 : in the addendum alternative, what does the added language imply? If a lease is canceled and not expired, does that mean we have to leave the premises?
thanks
Ps : payments have always been on time, they wanted us out with no just cause, and yes we are already looking elsewhere, but we want enough time to be ready, and don't want to waive any of our rights if we don't have to.
submitted by Competitive-Pie-8247 to legaladvice [link] [comments]


2024.05.24 08:56 Competitive_Net_1921 AITA for not letting my mother stay with me after she got evicted?

My (37M) mother (70F) and I are not super close, and the last few years she has been having a rough time. She is very financially irresponsible and has been barely surviving in California until she was recently evicted. To be fair, she helped me financially a few years ago when I was unemployed and waiting on my VA disability claim to progress, to the tune of about $14,000 over a period of about 18 months. I have since paid back almost $12,000 and continue to pay her $200 per month, but that is all I can afford right now.
I harbor a lot of resentment toward my mom for various reasons, she left my dad and I for about 6 months to tour Europe with her country band when I was a few months old. I don't really remember it but it never sat right with me. She divorced my dad and married a racist, verbally abusive man who was my step dad for a long time, who is a whole other can of worms that I won't go into. When I turned 18 they charged me rent to live with them after I dropped out of college and eventually moved from Texas (where I grew up) back to California (where I was born and lived until about 9-years-old). I stayed in Texas and have been here ever since, with a 4-year vacation in the military.
I feel like an asshole because my mom always supported me as best she could, much of the time as single mother but I think the person I am has a lot more with wanting to not be like her than it does with wanting to be like her really in any way. I know she is my mother and I am supposed to love and cherish her but the fact is I can't stand the woman. She is a karen in every sense of the word, always treating service workers poorly, mildly racist, entitled, self-centered, etc. I have been embarrassed to go anywhere with her in public since I was very young. As an only child and disabled combat veteran with extreme social anxiety, I just want to be left alone, and I have told her as much about 6 months ago when she floated the idea of coming back to Texas and staying with me "temporarily." I have a small 2-bedroom apartment that is not at all big enough to house her and her unruly, bully of a dog that is not potty trained. It's crazy but last I visited her a few years ago, her ~45lb dog completely bullies and annoys the crap out of my 75lb German Shepherd. Her dog also pisses and shits in the house daily, which I am not OK with.
Cut to the present (finally, sorry lol) and now she has been evicted as of a few months ago and moved in with her best friend from college, who is wealthy. When she floated staying with me before being evicted, I very clearly told her it was not an option, and that moving from CA to Austin, TX was not a wise decision as she would not be improving her cost of living situation much. I also selfishly just do not want her near me because she is prone to dropping by unannounced and it drives me insane. Anyway, a few months pass and I have not spoken with her in that time, but I thought I had made myself clear. She was also constantly asking me for money during this time, which she knows I do not have because I told her repeatedly I was not going to sacrifice my dog's or my well-being because of her poor life choices. A few days ago she tells me she has packed all of her things and moved to Austin in a uhaul, but she thinks it's a good idea and has "done her due-diligence." The day she arrives (3 days ago) she leaves me a voicemail stating she cannot move into her new place until the 1st, she has no money, and needs a place to stay. I told her she is an adult, to act like one, she is not my responsibility, she has attempted to insert herself into my life against my wishes, etc...and then I blocked her. The guilt-tripping and "why do you hate me?" stuff began immediately which is why I blocked her.
Now I'm just feeling like shit wondering if I am just a huge asshole. Her poor decisions have led her to desperation, but I have my own shit to deal with, you know? My life isn't perfect by any stretch of the imagination, and at 37 I am JUST starting to finally feel like I have things under control. And then she has to drop all of her bullshit in my lap and try to upend my life. So, if you've made it this far and have any judgements to pass, please do. I appreciate it regardless of how this turns out. Sorry for the word salad and jumping around so much but I am obviously stressed out and have no one to talk to about this, so I guess I'm just yelling into the void. I don't think I have ever in my life given her reason to believe that we were the type of mother and son that would live together when she got older. But maybe I'm just an asshole, I don't know. Please tell me. Thank you.
submitted by Competitive_Net_1921 to AITAH [link] [comments]


2024.05.24 05:30 HandofDOOM708 My landlord offered me a “proposal” after I asked if the hotel employees would stop trashing the yard. (CA)

My landlord offered me a “proposal” after I asked if the hotel employees would stop trashing the yard. (CA)
I’ve been renting a studio apartment on a hotel property for five years. My landlord has raised my rent five times, twice in one year, and the other times has been more than 10% of the previous year’s rent. The last time he tried to raise my rent, I told him I wanted a bunch of stuff fixed, like a place to throw away my garbage, smoke detectors, central heat and air, and a full fridge. Some of these things are deemed “unlivable in California. After I asked him to ask the people at the hotel to stop trashing the courtyard, he sent this proposal, which sounds like an soft eviction notice to me. I live with my girlfriend, and have most of the receipts for staying here. We have two kittens and I don’t know what to do. Apartments are super expensive here and I don’t know if they would let us bring both kittens. Any advise would be immensely helpful.
submitted by HandofDOOM708 to Renters [link] [comments]


2024.05.24 03:50 womanroaring78 how do we ask a subletter to move out?

I am the property manager for a house owned by a family member. The house is in Hayward, CA. The tenants have sublet the master bedroom and they are not on the lease, I am ok with that but the tenants want to ask the subletters to move. They asked me for help. I said they should give them 60 days notice as they have lived there about 4 years.
The tenants are going to have one of their adult children and his kids move in with them so that's why they need the room. They have been helping with rent at another location and it's stressing their finances so they asked if I was ok with them moving in. I am so now they are not sure how to proceed with the eviction.
The tenants do not have a formal written agreement as they questioned the wording on the one I gave them and complained that it wasn't "right" so they never signed so I know they just have a verbal month to month, if that makes any difference.
So do they need to give them a formal written move out notice or do they just say, hey can you guys move out in a few months we need the room?
Also I know renter laws changed quite a bit, I no longer live in California so I'm not as up to date about rent control and things, it's a single family home and isn't under a corporation or anything like that, it is in a trust with my family members name and I am co trustee, but we are not an inc or llc or anything else.
thank you!
submitted by womanroaring78 to legaladvice [link] [comments]


http://activeproperty.pl/