Ls 2009 gold edition tiere
XboxFitness
2013.10.21 09:08 dsadel XboxFitness
/xboxfitness is dedicated to getting healthy with the help of the xbox fitness app on the xbox one.
2024.05.20 02:53 Amanda39 [Discussion] Armadale by Wilkie Collins Victorian Lady Detective Squad Readalong Book 4 Chapter 3 - End
Welcome back once more, for our final discussion of Armadale. I apologize again for the discussion being late. Last week, my excuse was that I had to spend time with my sister's family, including a labradoodle. This week, I am dog-sitting my mother's beagle, who has separation anxiety and gas. I am horribly sleep-deprived because this dog insists on sleeping next to my bed every night, snoring loudly and farting. Speaking of people breathing in poison in their sleep, let's get to the recap:
Allan has just set off for the Adriatic, with his cash converted to gold, obviously the result of Manuel's suggestions. Lydia and Ozias have been transferred to Turin by Ozias's employer, and Lydia pretends to have gotten a letter from her mother, asking her to come home, so she has an excuse to go back to London. Once there, she checks the newspaper for any articles or obituaries indicating that Allan has died. She also finds Mother Oldershaw's new address, but decides not to visit her.
After a few days, she finally gets the news she's been hoping for. Allan's yacht sunk off the southern coast of Italy, and everyone on board perished. Her next step is to write to Bashwood:
My dearest Bashwood,
I desire you... I mean, I desire to *meet with you... to apologize for my previous behavior towards you. I have foolishly made the mistake of marrying an immature child. If only I had married a real man (realness not necessarily extending to his teeth and hair)!*
Please, do not show this letter to anyone. Let us meet clandestinely.
Sincerely,
Lydia Armadale (note the last name)
Lydia then considers the marriage certificate, and realizes a glaring flaw in her plan: Ozias's handwriting looks nothing like Allan's. In a panic, she decides that her only option is to get advice from Mother Oldershaw. Unfortunately, Mother Oldershaw appears to have found God, and no longer wants anything to do with Lydia's plans. (Of course, she refuses to give Lydia the signed paper that she was going to use to extort money from Lydia if her plans succeeded.)
While leaving Oldershaw's, Lydia runs into Dr. Downward... excuse me, Dr. Le Doux, totally legitimate sanitarium owner. She realizes that he may be able to advise her, and asks to meet him later at the sanitarium. The sanitarium is basically what you'd expect a 19th-century sanitarium to be: creepy old house with shelves containing jars of preserved "creatures," a "galvanic apparatus" for providing electric shocks, etc. No patients yet, though.
Lydia tells the doctor her story, leaving out the worst details (he doesn't know that she's the reason the yacht sunk, or that her husband goes by the fake name "Ozias Midwinter"). Downward agrees to assist her by claiming to be a witness to the marriage... for a fee of six hundred pounds. Lydia agrees, and he assists her in sending a letter to Thorpe Ambrose, claiming to be Allan's widow.
The next day, Lydia gets a visit from Bashwood, who delivers the news that Neelie is beside herself with grief, and Mr. Darch is handling the matter of the inheritance, which was going to go to Allan's cousin, before Lydia announced her claim.
Bashwood returns a few days later with a shocking letter from Yugoslavia: Allan is alive! This is where I'd normally try to write a funny version of the letter, but nothing I could possibly write would be funnier than the actual letter's opening line: "I have been the victim of a rascally attempt at robbery and murder." Yes, "rascally." Oh, Allan, never change. One of the would-be murderers took pity on Allan and didn't securely board up his cabin, so he was able to escape instead of sinking with the yacht.
Lydia turns to Downward for help.
Downward: What if we trap Allan in the sanitarium?
Lydia: And murder him?
Downward: WTF, no. We get him to agree to not press legal charges against us.
Lydia: And then we murder him?
Downward: I have so many regrets about teaming up with you
Lydia: How do we catch him?
Downward: You could get Bashwood to lurk around the train station and intercept him before anyone else sees him. Have him tell Allan that Miss Milroy was sent here because she was driven insane by her grief for him.
Lydia: Can we murder Allan and Miss Milroy?
Downward: I am running an unlicensed sanitarium under a false name, and even I think you're unhinged.
Lydia: Gwilty as charged
Downward: But wait, what if he doesn't agree immediately, and we have to keep him here for months? What if I have actual patients at the time, and they report us?
Lydia: What if...
Downward: ...please don't say "murder"
Lydia: ...what if he had an accident?
Downward: Oh. Well, if it was an "accident," that would be okay. I don't know how an accident could happen, though, if you aren't an inmate here.
Lydia: I'll think about it
Meanwhile, Bashwood keeps vigil at the train station, until one day he sees... Ozias, who is searching for Lydia because she's stopped writing to him. While they talk to each other, Bashwood can't contain his shock at hearing that Lydia is Ozias's wife, and accidentally calls her "Mrs. Armadale," which understandably makes Ozias suspicious, so he follows Bashwood to see where he goes, which of course leads him straight to Lydia. Lydia pretends she was never married to Ozias, and Ozias faints from the shock.
Lydia heads straight to the sanitarium, tells Downward she's going to be an inmate, and asks for a sleeping draught. Downward prepares the draught, but first places yellow liquid in a purple flask. He then informs Lydia of what he thinks they should say at the inquest after Allan dies: The two of them knew he hadn't drowned, but when he arrived in England, they decided to trap him in the sanitarium because, shortly after his marriage to Lydia, Allan had starting having a delusion that he was engaged to Neelie. Once in the sanitarium, Downward diagnosed Allan with an incurable and fatal brain ailment, and that's what killed him.
Downward has scheduled a "Visitors' Day" so that people will witness Lydia as an inmate in the asylum. The visitors are mostly women, because life as a woman in Victorian England was so boring, they had nothing better to do than go to sanitariums to gawk at the mentally ill people and see where they will eventually live when the hysteria finally drives them mad. (I am only barely paraphrasing. The actual quote is "In the miserable monotony of the lives led by a large section of the middle classes of England, anything is welcome to the women which offers them any sort of harmless refuge from the established tyranny of the principle that all human happiness begins and ends at home.")
Downward shows them around the sanitarium and explains how it will be run, including only allowing novels that make people feel comfortable. (I assumed this was an intentional satire of Wilkie's critics, and the notes in the Oxford World's Classics edition confirmed this.)
But then Downward gave a sales pitch that damn near sold me on his sanitarium. "I throw up impregnable moral intrenchments between Worry and You. ... Will ten minutes’ irritation from a barking dog or a screeching child undo every atom of good done to a nervous sufferer by a month’s medical treatment? There isn’t a competent doctor in England who will venture to deny it!" Considering I almost couldn't post last week's discussion because of a few hours' exposure to two loud children and a labradoodle, I'm about ready to self-diagnose with hysteria and deranged lunacy.
He also explains that while the bedrooms lack fireplaces, they're heated with hot water. This impressed me because I've read about Victorian insane asylums not having fireplaces in the bedrooms (since the inmates might burn themselves), but I always assumed this meant that the inmates were cold in the winter. But wait... the bedroom also has secret controls that let him open, close, and lock the window and door from the outside, and a vent that lets him pump gas into the room. Whaaat? I rescind my diagnosis of hysteria and deranged lunacy. I want nothing to do with this.
After the tour is finished, Downward demonstrates to Lydia how to prepare the poison, and then breaks the bottle so that his assistant (who doesn't know about the purple flask) will think there's no more of that chemical in the house.
Meanwhile, Ozias is stalking Bashwood at the train station. He thinks Lydia is cheating on him, and Bashwood is waiting for Lydia's lover. But then he sees Bashwood with Allan. After confronting the two of them, he learns Bashwood's story about having to take Allan to Neelie in the sanitarium. Realizing that Lydia is probably still behind Bashwood's actions, Ozias insists on going with the two of them. On arriving at the sanitarium, Allan is informed that Neelie cannot see him until the morning, but he and Ozias are welcome to spend the night: Allan in Room Four, and Ozias in Room Three.
Lydia sets Bashwood up to spy on Allan's door from a room with a grate in its door. She tells him to make sure Allan stays in his room all night. Later, watching from the grate, Bashwood observes Ozias leave his room and examine the fumigating apparatus connected to Allan's room. Then Ozias stuffs his handkerchief in the grate, blocking Bashwood's view, before going into Allan's room and convincing Allan to switch rooms with him.
Later that night, Lydia returns and asks Bashwood if anything happened. Too afraid to tell her about the handkerchief, he tells her nothing happened, and she dismisses him to bed. After almost convincing herself to not go through with it, she then starts the process of pouring the poison at five minute intervals. While waiting for one of the intervals to pass, she notices Ozias's handkerchief and realizes that Bashwood lied to her. She checks in Room Three, and finds Allan asleep where Ozias should be.
In a panic, Lydia rushes into Room Four and drags the unconscious Ozias out. She then continues to pour the poison, writes a last letter to Ozias, and locks herself in the room.
We end with an epilogue that rapidly ties up all the random loose ends. Lydia has been buried in a nearly unmarked grave. The doctor is apparently still running his sanitarium. Allan and Neelie will be married in the spring. Mrs. Milroy doesn't have much longer to live, but she's undergone a personality change for some reason and she and the Major are happy for once. Ozias is recovering and living with Allan. Mother Oldershaw is a religious speaker, apparently. Bashwood has gone insane. Manuel drowned.
But wait, one last thing: Wilkie has something to say to us. He wants us to know that he intended the dream to be left up to interpretation. Thanks for handing me a discussion question like that, Wilkie. He also shares a weird-ass story about how, after he'd finished the rough draft and while the story was in the middle of serialization, several people were poisoned in their sleep on a boat called The Armadale. Okay, Wilkie. Thank you for that incredibly weird anecdote.
submitted by Amanda39 to bookclub [link] [comments]
Allan has just set off for the Adriatic, with his cash converted to gold, obviously the result of Manuel's suggestions. Lydia and Ozias have been transferred to Turin by Ozias's employer, and Lydia pretends to have gotten a letter from her mother, asking her to come home, so she has an excuse to go back to London. Once there, she checks the newspaper for any articles or obituaries indicating that Allan has died. She also finds Mother Oldershaw's new address, but decides not to visit her.
After a few days, she finally gets the news she's been hoping for. Allan's yacht sunk off the southern coast of Italy, and everyone on board perished. Her next step is to write to Bashwood:
My dearest Bashwood,
I desire you... I mean, I desire to *meet with you... to apologize for my previous behavior towards you. I have foolishly made the mistake of marrying an immature child. If only I had married a real man (realness not necessarily extending to his teeth and hair)!*
Please, do not show this letter to anyone. Let us meet clandestinely.
Sincerely,
Lydia Armadale (note the last name)
Lydia then considers the marriage certificate, and realizes a glaring flaw in her plan: Ozias's handwriting looks nothing like Allan's. In a panic, she decides that her only option is to get advice from Mother Oldershaw. Unfortunately, Mother Oldershaw appears to have found God, and no longer wants anything to do with Lydia's plans. (Of course, she refuses to give Lydia the signed paper that she was going to use to extort money from Lydia if her plans succeeded.)
While leaving Oldershaw's, Lydia runs into Dr. Downward... excuse me, Dr. Le Doux, totally legitimate sanitarium owner. She realizes that he may be able to advise her, and asks to meet him later at the sanitarium. The sanitarium is basically what you'd expect a 19th-century sanitarium to be: creepy old house with shelves containing jars of preserved "creatures," a "galvanic apparatus" for providing electric shocks, etc. No patients yet, though.
Lydia tells the doctor her story, leaving out the worst details (he doesn't know that she's the reason the yacht sunk, or that her husband goes by the fake name "Ozias Midwinter"). Downward agrees to assist her by claiming to be a witness to the marriage... for a fee of six hundred pounds. Lydia agrees, and he assists her in sending a letter to Thorpe Ambrose, claiming to be Allan's widow.
The next day, Lydia gets a visit from Bashwood, who delivers the news that Neelie is beside herself with grief, and Mr. Darch is handling the matter of the inheritance, which was going to go to Allan's cousin, before Lydia announced her claim.
Bashwood returns a few days later with a shocking letter from Yugoslavia: Allan is alive! This is where I'd normally try to write a funny version of the letter, but nothing I could possibly write would be funnier than the actual letter's opening line: "I have been the victim of a rascally attempt at robbery and murder." Yes, "rascally." Oh, Allan, never change. One of the would-be murderers took pity on Allan and didn't securely board up his cabin, so he was able to escape instead of sinking with the yacht.
Lydia turns to Downward for help.
Downward: What if we trap Allan in the sanitarium?
Lydia: And murder him?
Downward: WTF, no. We get him to agree to not press legal charges against us.
Lydia: And then we murder him?
Downward: I have so many regrets about teaming up with you
Lydia: How do we catch him?
Downward: You could get Bashwood to lurk around the train station and intercept him before anyone else sees him. Have him tell Allan that Miss Milroy was sent here because she was driven insane by her grief for him.
Lydia: Can we murder Allan and Miss Milroy?
Downward: I am running an unlicensed sanitarium under a false name, and even I think you're unhinged.
Lydia: Gwilty as charged
Downward: But wait, what if he doesn't agree immediately, and we have to keep him here for months? What if I have actual patients at the time, and they report us?
Lydia: What if...
Downward: ...please don't say "murder"
Lydia: ...what if he had an accident?
Downward: Oh. Well, if it was an "accident," that would be okay. I don't know how an accident could happen, though, if you aren't an inmate here.
Lydia: I'll think about it
Meanwhile, Bashwood keeps vigil at the train station, until one day he sees... Ozias, who is searching for Lydia because she's stopped writing to him. While they talk to each other, Bashwood can't contain his shock at hearing that Lydia is Ozias's wife, and accidentally calls her "Mrs. Armadale," which understandably makes Ozias suspicious, so he follows Bashwood to see where he goes, which of course leads him straight to Lydia. Lydia pretends she was never married to Ozias, and Ozias faints from the shock.
Lydia heads straight to the sanitarium, tells Downward she's going to be an inmate, and asks for a sleeping draught. Downward prepares the draught, but first places yellow liquid in a purple flask. He then informs Lydia of what he thinks they should say at the inquest after Allan dies: The two of them knew he hadn't drowned, but when he arrived in England, they decided to trap him in the sanitarium because, shortly after his marriage to Lydia, Allan had starting having a delusion that he was engaged to Neelie. Once in the sanitarium, Downward diagnosed Allan with an incurable and fatal brain ailment, and that's what killed him.
Downward has scheduled a "Visitors' Day" so that people will witness Lydia as an inmate in the asylum. The visitors are mostly women, because life as a woman in Victorian England was so boring, they had nothing better to do than go to sanitariums to gawk at the mentally ill people and see where they will eventually live when the hysteria finally drives them mad. (I am only barely paraphrasing. The actual quote is "In the miserable monotony of the lives led by a large section of the middle classes of England, anything is welcome to the women which offers them any sort of harmless refuge from the established tyranny of the principle that all human happiness begins and ends at home.")
Downward shows them around the sanitarium and explains how it will be run, including only allowing novels that make people feel comfortable. (I assumed this was an intentional satire of Wilkie's critics, and the notes in the Oxford World's Classics edition confirmed this.)
But then Downward gave a sales pitch that damn near sold me on his sanitarium. "I throw up impregnable moral intrenchments between Worry and You. ... Will ten minutes’ irritation from a barking dog or a screeching child undo every atom of good done to a nervous sufferer by a month’s medical treatment? There isn’t a competent doctor in England who will venture to deny it!" Considering I almost couldn't post last week's discussion because of a few hours' exposure to two loud children and a labradoodle, I'm about ready to self-diagnose with hysteria and deranged lunacy.
He also explains that while the bedrooms lack fireplaces, they're heated with hot water. This impressed me because I've read about Victorian insane asylums not having fireplaces in the bedrooms (since the inmates might burn themselves), but I always assumed this meant that the inmates were cold in the winter. But wait... the bedroom also has secret controls that let him open, close, and lock the window and door from the outside, and a vent that lets him pump gas into the room. Whaaat? I rescind my diagnosis of hysteria and deranged lunacy. I want nothing to do with this.
After the tour is finished, Downward demonstrates to Lydia how to prepare the poison, and then breaks the bottle so that his assistant (who doesn't know about the purple flask) will think there's no more of that chemical in the house.
Meanwhile, Ozias is stalking Bashwood at the train station. He thinks Lydia is cheating on him, and Bashwood is waiting for Lydia's lover. But then he sees Bashwood with Allan. After confronting the two of them, he learns Bashwood's story about having to take Allan to Neelie in the sanitarium. Realizing that Lydia is probably still behind Bashwood's actions, Ozias insists on going with the two of them. On arriving at the sanitarium, Allan is informed that Neelie cannot see him until the morning, but he and Ozias are welcome to spend the night: Allan in Room Four, and Ozias in Room Three.
Lydia sets Bashwood up to spy on Allan's door from a room with a grate in its door. She tells him to make sure Allan stays in his room all night. Later, watching from the grate, Bashwood observes Ozias leave his room and examine the fumigating apparatus connected to Allan's room. Then Ozias stuffs his handkerchief in the grate, blocking Bashwood's view, before going into Allan's room and convincing Allan to switch rooms with him.
Later that night, Lydia returns and asks Bashwood if anything happened. Too afraid to tell her about the handkerchief, he tells her nothing happened, and she dismisses him to bed. After almost convincing herself to not go through with it, she then starts the process of pouring the poison at five minute intervals. While waiting for one of the intervals to pass, she notices Ozias's handkerchief and realizes that Bashwood lied to her. She checks in Room Three, and finds Allan asleep where Ozias should be.
In a panic, Lydia rushes into Room Four and drags the unconscious Ozias out. She then continues to pour the poison, writes a last letter to Ozias, and locks herself in the room.
We end with an epilogue that rapidly ties up all the random loose ends. Lydia has been buried in a nearly unmarked grave. The doctor is apparently still running his sanitarium. Allan and Neelie will be married in the spring. Mrs. Milroy doesn't have much longer to live, but she's undergone a personality change for some reason and she and the Major are happy for once. Ozias is recovering and living with Allan. Mother Oldershaw is a religious speaker, apparently. Bashwood has gone insane. Manuel drowned.
But wait, one last thing: Wilkie has something to say to us. He wants us to know that he intended the dream to be left up to interpretation. Thanks for handing me a discussion question like that, Wilkie. He also shares a weird-ass story about how, after he'd finished the rough draft and while the story was in the middle of serialization, several people were poisoned in their sleep on a boat called The Armadale. Okay, Wilkie. Thank you for that incredibly weird anecdote.
2024.05.20 02:52 Reeks1323 [Recruiting] 999/808 #2GP0Y8Q89 Townhall 12+ Clan Level 9 CWL Gold I
Looking for loyal TH13+ who will help us in all aspects of the game! But most importantly CWL!
Clan Requirements: Townhall 12+ / Crystal+ / Active Daily
Clan Name: 999/808
Clan Tag: #2GP0Y8Q89
Clan: Level: 9
CWL: Gold I
Clan Games: are a MUST. Every member must participate in Clan Games and must get as much as needed for Top Tier.
Clan Capital: Everyone will participate in raids every weekend. We are a new clan starting out so Capital Hall is level 7 upgrading to 8. We are pushing to progress and all actively working together to get to where we want to be!
Additional Info: We are looking for loyal people who want to grow with a smaller clan. This clan started in October 2024 and we are clan lvl 9 and well on our way to 10. We war Twice a Week and participate in all aspects of the game! JOIN OUR DISCORD TO COMMUNICATE ON A DIFFERENT PLATFORM! The discord isnt a must to join!
submitted by Reeks1323 to ClashOfClansRecruit [link] [comments]
Clan Requirements: Townhall 12+ / Crystal+ / Active Daily
Clan Name: 999/808
Clan Tag: #2GP0Y8Q89
Clan: Level: 9
CWL: Gold I
Clan Games: are a MUST. Every member must participate in Clan Games and must get as much as needed for Top Tier.
Clan Capital: Everyone will participate in raids every weekend. We are a new clan starting out so Capital Hall is level 7 upgrading to 8. We are pushing to progress and all actively working together to get to where we want to be!
Additional Info: We are looking for loyal people who want to grow with a smaller clan. This clan started in October 2024 and we are clan lvl 9 and well on our way to 10. We war Twice a Week and participate in all aspects of the game! JOIN OUR DISCORD TO COMMUNICATE ON A DIFFERENT PLATFORM! The discord isnt a must to join!
2024.05.20 02:49 ArrellBytes Need advice on a build- do these parts make sense together??
I am considering doing a PC build - I have only done simple systems up to now...
I want this system to be as future proof as possible, I want it to be easily upgradable and expandable...
I will be using it for:
The Case: Thermaltake Tower 900
The CPU: AMD RYZEN 7960X 24core
The motherboard: ASUS Pro WS TRX50-SAGE WIFI CEB Workstation motherboard
OR
ASROCK TRX50 WS AMD TRX50
GPU: GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 4090 Xtreme WATERFORCE 24G Graphics Card (the motherboard allows me to add more GPU over time, which is my plan when the next generation comes out)
RAM: CORSAIR VENGEANCE DDR5 RAM 96GB (2x48GB) (with option to double this if needed)
Power Supply: FSP Cannon PRO 2000W ATX 12V & EPS 12V 80 Plus Gold Certified
I am uncertain what to do for the diskspace... I will want to read/write large data sets and large numbers of image files quickly. I also want to make sure that the bootup drive is bulletproof... perhaps a raid configuration? What would be the fastest and most reliable SSD setup?
I was thinking of using : SABRENT 4-Drive NVMe SSD to PCIe 4.0 X 16 Adapter Card with Active Cooling with 4x SAMSUNG 990 PRO Series - 2TB?
With another larger SSD drive for data and applications?
I currently have 5Tb storage on my current computer and am starting to have space issues...
I would appreciate any input and suggestions on the system... is the CPU/Motherboard a good choice? Will they have the bandwidth to support multiple GPU (perhaps adding a 5090 when it comes out?)
Are the parts all compatible with eachother and my planned usage of the computer?
submitted by ArrellBytes to PcBuild [link] [comments]
I want this system to be as future proof as possible, I want it to be easily upgradable and expandable...
I will be using it for:
- 3D modeling with Blender
- Video editing
- Maybe VR applications
- Analysis of VERY large multi gigabit arrays of data using MATLAB
- Processing large numbers of .Tiff files, calculating centroids and other analysis using MATLAB
- and finally I would like to play with AI on my computer, running things like the 70billion parameter LLAMA3 and stable diffusion locally on the computer- this is the application that really drives the design of the computer.
The Case: Thermaltake Tower 900
The CPU: AMD RYZEN 7960X 24core
The motherboard: ASUS Pro WS TRX50-SAGE WIFI CEB Workstation motherboard
OR
ASROCK TRX50 WS AMD TRX50
GPU: GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 4090 Xtreme WATERFORCE 24G Graphics Card (the motherboard allows me to add more GPU over time, which is my plan when the next generation comes out)
RAM: CORSAIR VENGEANCE DDR5 RAM 96GB (2x48GB) (with option to double this if needed)
Power Supply: FSP Cannon PRO 2000W ATX 12V & EPS 12V 80 Plus Gold Certified
I am uncertain what to do for the diskspace... I will want to read/write large data sets and large numbers of image files quickly. I also want to make sure that the bootup drive is bulletproof... perhaps a raid configuration? What would be the fastest and most reliable SSD setup?
I was thinking of using : SABRENT 4-Drive NVMe SSD to PCIe 4.0 X 16 Adapter Card with Active Cooling with 4x SAMSUNG 990 PRO Series - 2TB?
With another larger SSD drive for data and applications?
I currently have 5Tb storage on my current computer and am starting to have space issues...
I would appreciate any input and suggestions on the system... is the CPU/Motherboard a good choice? Will they have the bandwidth to support multiple GPU (perhaps adding a 5090 when it comes out?)
Are the parts all compatible with eachother and my planned usage of the computer?
2024.05.20 02:49 planetsoup sooooo about the colored soulstones? or gems?
i’m a new player (picked it up within the last couple weeks, so apologies if i’m not using the correct terms for these items) and have been having a lot of fun with it even with the grinding. i’ve been browsing this subreddit and seeing the skill trees and builds makes me so excited to progress even further!!
BUT i can’t seem to figure out how to consistently get the colored soulstones (or are they called gems??) i have plenty of the minor soulstones, but i feel like i’m doing something wrong bc i end whatever round and only get one or two and then get materials and stuff. is that how it’s supposed to be? ive unlocked curses and have completed a couple maps on tier III at least, and i have a few characters up to 20+ prestige. i’m trying to finish the first skill tree but is there something i should be doing differently in order to get these things?? or are they specific to certain maps / curse levels etc?
ive tried to look through this subreddit and also on the discord and also on google but haven’t been able to get a straight answer as most answers come up talking about the actual materials and minor soulstones which i have plenty of. if that’s just the way the game is, like i said i love the grind, but i just wanna make sure im not missing anything and doing everything i can to get them to unlock the rest of the skill trees and characters. thanks for any tips / info y’all can give me :)
edit: and if there are guides that i completely missed please feel free to share them!!
submitted by planetsoup to SoulstoneSurvivors [link] [comments]
BUT i can’t seem to figure out how to consistently get the colored soulstones (or are they called gems??) i have plenty of the minor soulstones, but i feel like i’m doing something wrong bc i end whatever round and only get one or two and then get materials and stuff. is that how it’s supposed to be? ive unlocked curses and have completed a couple maps on tier III at least, and i have a few characters up to 20+ prestige. i’m trying to finish the first skill tree but is there something i should be doing differently in order to get these things?? or are they specific to certain maps / curse levels etc?
ive tried to look through this subreddit and also on the discord and also on google but haven’t been able to get a straight answer as most answers come up talking about the actual materials and minor soulstones which i have plenty of. if that’s just the way the game is, like i said i love the grind, but i just wanna make sure im not missing anything and doing everything i can to get them to unlock the rest of the skill trees and characters. thanks for any tips / info y’all can give me :)
edit: and if there are guides that i completely missed please feel free to share them!!
2024.05.20 02:43 Street-Air-546 Has mobile data gone a bit shit lately?
In sydney. On 4g/5g. Disclaimer: am on aldimobile so maybe its them.
anyway noticing this year or lately mobile service getting a bit shit. For a start, 5g makes no difference and often makes things worse so I usually disable it.
Symptoms are stalling pages: loads never finish. Images super lazy loading. Sometimes no data at all but can be fixed by switching plane mode then back on maybe to a different tower.
Right now, speed test says 50-100mbit down and 7 up (yeah thats a bit shit) but ebay stalls, facebook stalls, reddit shows blank images often, smh stalls. One connection is ok but it feels like tons of little connections are shit.
The other evening I was standing in chinatown and maps wouldnt even load tiles. That’s ridiculous.
Mobile data used to be pretty reliable, if you had two bars or more it was fine but lately it seems too often you can have two bars and its just shit. America is like this on tier 2 providers I noticed. Never expected australia to get like this. Do you have to buy a gold plated mobile plan now not to ride at the back of the network plane.
Is this resellers of telstra buying shit bandwidth, or just things getting, well, a bit shit?
submitted by Street-Air-546 to TelstraAustralia [link] [comments]
anyway noticing this year or lately mobile service getting a bit shit. For a start, 5g makes no difference and often makes things worse so I usually disable it.
Symptoms are stalling pages: loads never finish. Images super lazy loading. Sometimes no data at all but can be fixed by switching plane mode then back on maybe to a different tower.
Right now, speed test says 50-100mbit down and 7 up (yeah thats a bit shit) but ebay stalls, facebook stalls, reddit shows blank images often, smh stalls. One connection is ok but it feels like tons of little connections are shit.
The other evening I was standing in chinatown and maps wouldnt even load tiles. That’s ridiculous.
Mobile data used to be pretty reliable, if you had two bars or more it was fine but lately it seems too often you can have two bars and its just shit. America is like this on tier 2 providers I noticed. Never expected australia to get like this. Do you have to buy a gold plated mobile plan now not to ride at the back of the network plane.
Is this resellers of telstra buying shit bandwidth, or just things getting, well, a bit shit?
2024.05.20 02:34 seqsynerd An honest conversation about City
EDIT: The topics I touch on in this post are relevant to many other top football leagues, but as this is the Prem sub I decided to stick to and only focus on Prem.
With City winning an unprecedented 4th title in a row, it seems now more than ever people are bringing up the alleged corruption, especially as it relates to the quality of the Premier League. While I can understand why people are upset at the 115 charges, to me it's a symptom of attacking the effect rather than the cause. Let's dial the clock back a bit here.
The traditional "big six" in the Prem (remember, used to be big 4 which is somewhat relevant here when examining how it became big 6) became such because of what most people would argue is essentially "well run business." The problem here is that even though the clubs are technically independent operations, they still have to play within a league system. They don't sell their own product, they sell competition, or more specifically, winning a competition, which requires other clubs. However, once these teams got themselves in a position to be perennial winners they (and their fans) were more than happy to shut the door behind them (remember, there have only been 7 premier league winners in 32 seasons, and only 24 english football champions EVER despite it being an open league). The so-called "well run business" essentially now (and arguably has always) boils down to using disparate wealth to strongarm your way into getting the best players and managers from any other "lower tier" club to maintain dominance.
Well, at a certain point, the smaller "fodder" clubs are going to realize that the gap has widened too far. It is nigh impossible in the year of our lord 2024 for a small club to ever even begin the process of getting to the same competitive level as a Liverpool, Manchester United, Arsenal, etc. So what's the next best thing? Well you know what they say: if you can't win, cheat! These clubs have realized they have two options: (1) Continue to remain a small-time club forever (barring any absolutely catastrophic financial meltdown of the biggest clubs), or (2) sell yourself to the highest bidder for massive cash injection, regardless of whether you break some rules (Man City) or not (Chelsea, Newcastle) in the process.
In short, the anti-competition rules of the Premier League have created this scenario, and it should have been caught way sooner. Like, decades sooner. Maybe it was, but the money talked too loud for anyone to listen.
All I know is, the fans of English football need to come together to voice a collective opinion in order to get this to change. There's such a crab-in-a-bucket mentality when it comes to issues in the Prem from FFP to VAR to everything else— when it happens to benefit your club it's crickets, but when it doesn't, then you're up in arms saying this isn't fair because your beloved Arsenal or Chelsea or Liverpool or whoever got the short end of the stick. We need to come together for a better league overall. For a league that will actually be healthy in the long term. If we don't, we'll just end up with 10 City titles in a row until the next sheik sportswashing project knocks them off.
submitted by seqsynerd to PremierLeague [link] [comments]
With City winning an unprecedented 4th title in a row, it seems now more than ever people are bringing up the alleged corruption, especially as it relates to the quality of the Premier League. While I can understand why people are upset at the 115 charges, to me it's a symptom of attacking the effect rather than the cause. Let's dial the clock back a bit here.
The traditional "big six" in the Prem (remember, used to be big 4 which is somewhat relevant here when examining how it became big 6) became such because of what most people would argue is essentially "well run business." The problem here is that even though the clubs are technically independent operations, they still have to play within a league system. They don't sell their own product, they sell competition, or more specifically, winning a competition, which requires other clubs. However, once these teams got themselves in a position to be perennial winners they (and their fans) were more than happy to shut the door behind them (remember, there have only been 7 premier league winners in 32 seasons, and only 24 english football champions EVER despite it being an open league). The so-called "well run business" essentially now (and arguably has always) boils down to using disparate wealth to strongarm your way into getting the best players and managers from any other "lower tier" club to maintain dominance.
Well, at a certain point, the smaller "fodder" clubs are going to realize that the gap has widened too far. It is nigh impossible in the year of our lord 2024 for a small club to ever even begin the process of getting to the same competitive level as a Liverpool, Manchester United, Arsenal, etc. So what's the next best thing? Well you know what they say: if you can't win, cheat! These clubs have realized they have two options: (1) Continue to remain a small-time club forever (barring any absolutely catastrophic financial meltdown of the biggest clubs), or (2) sell yourself to the highest bidder for massive cash injection, regardless of whether you break some rules (Man City) or not (Chelsea, Newcastle) in the process.
In short, the anti-competition rules of the Premier League have created this scenario, and it should have been caught way sooner. Like, decades sooner. Maybe it was, but the money talked too loud for anyone to listen.
All I know is, the fans of English football need to come together to voice a collective opinion in order to get this to change. There's such a crab-in-a-bucket mentality when it comes to issues in the Prem from FFP to VAR to everything else— when it happens to benefit your club it's crickets, but when it doesn't, then you're up in arms saying this isn't fair because your beloved Arsenal or Chelsea or Liverpool or whoever got the short end of the stick. We need to come together for a better league overall. For a league that will actually be healthy in the long term. If we don't, we'll just end up with 10 City titles in a row until the next sheik sportswashing project knocks them off.
2024.05.20 02:34 Jewel_Kemerena Every Cuphead Song Ranked Form
Earlier this year, I came across a video by Media Motifs ranking all the songs in Omori. I thought it was a really fun idea, so I made my own form for ranking all the songs in Cuphead.
How It Works:
Pick 20 songs: 3 for Gold Tier, 7 for Silver Tier and 10 for Bronze Tier
Gold Tier Songs get 14 points
Silver Tier songs get 8 points
Bronze Tier songs get 2 points
The form will be up until the 3rd of June (2 weeks from now)
Once the entry period is closed, I will calculate the results and put them in another Reddit post on this channel.
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfdTA0gDW0q-iLTkPJyXXp7n7KbS2ioyjZiHpVFp_5WdPOJyQ/viewform?usp=sf_link
submitted by Jewel_Kemerena to Cuphead [link] [comments]
How It Works:
Pick 20 songs: 3 for Gold Tier, 7 for Silver Tier and 10 for Bronze Tier
Gold Tier Songs get 14 points
Silver Tier songs get 8 points
Bronze Tier songs get 2 points
The form will be up until the 3rd of June (2 weeks from now)
Once the entry period is closed, I will calculate the results and put them in another Reddit post on this channel.
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfdTA0gDW0q-iLTkPJyXXp7n7KbS2ioyjZiHpVFp_5WdPOJyQ/viewform?usp=sf_link
2024.05.20 02:29 RodeoBoss66 Kevin Costner: No Bull, No Compromises
 | https://www.cowboysindians.com/2024/05/kevin-costner-no-bull-no-compromises/ submitted by RodeoBoss66 to YellowstoneShow [link] [comments] by Joe Leydon May 14, 2024 At the heart of HORIZON: AN AMERICAN SAGA, the prodigiously ambitious and dramatically potent western epic starring and directed by Kevin Costner, there is a scene where the commander of a far-flung 1860s Army post (Danny Huston) explains to a concerned subordinate (Sam Worthington) why, despite the rigors of overland travel by wagon train, and despite the repeated attacks by Indians who are understandably protective of their land, nothing will stop the seemingly endless waves of pioneers bent on settling the West. “These people,” the commander says, not entirely sympathetically, “think that if they’re tough enough, smart enough, and mean enough, all this will be theirs someday. There’s no army of this earth that will stop those wagons coming. Little as they be wanted.” But what will happen when those hearty pioneers see along the sides of the trail the countless graves of those who went before them, and didn’t survive the journey? The commander shrugs. The newcomers will think they’re luckier, and that they’ll survive and thrive. “And you know what?” he adds. “Some of them will.” Costner intends HORIZON as ultimately a series of four films — with the first two opening this summer, June 28 and August 16 — that, while focusing on a roughly 15-year period before and after the Civil War, will dramatize, even-handedly and excitingly, how the allure and promise of new lives in a new land fueled an unshakable belief in what has become known, for better or worse, as Manifest Destiny. Some of the characters journey westward to fulfill dreams. Others move along to escape lives that have become nightmares. And still others — specifically, the Native Americans who inhabit the lands that the settlers covet — must cope with the repeated appearances by these intruders. Some live. Some die. And, yes, some kill. Costner earns his top billing in HORIZON with his meticulously understated yet richly detailed performance as Hayes Ellison, the traditionally laconic western protagonist who never goes looking for trouble — goes out of his way to avoid it, actually — yet finds it follows him like a faithful dog. But he is just first among many in an exceptional ensemble cast that also includes (in Part 1) Sienna Miller, Sam Worthington, Giovanni Ribisi, Jena Malone, Abbey Lee, Michael Rooker, Danny Huston, Luke Wilson, Isabelle Fuhrman, Jeff Fahey, Will Patton, Tatanka Means, Owen Crow Shoe, Ella Hunt, and Jamie Campbell Bower. I caught up with Costner in March — by sheer coincidence, the 33rd anniversary of the night he won Oscar gold as Best Director of Best Picture winner DANCES WITH WOLVES (1990) — just as he was putting the finishing touches on HORIZON: AN AMERICAN SAGA, PART II. Since he’d recently been under so much pressure while making not just one but two epics while avoiding tabloid reports about his possible departure from the popular TV series Yellowstone and the breakup of his 20-year marriage, I figured it might be a great idea to break the ice with a different spin on a predictable question. Cowboys & Indians: So, it’s been quite a while since you directed this actor, Kevin Costner. Since the terrific 2003 western Open Range, *as a matter of fact. Has he learned anything since you last worked with him?* Kevin Costner: [Laughs] It’s really hard to know. I mean, I look at this movie, and the thing that stands out to me is not what I’ve learned, but maybe what I’ve brought to bear in getting it shot in 52 days. I shot DANCES in 106, WYATT EARP (1994) was about 115, and we did this in 52 — and it’s actually as big if not bigger than both of those. C&I: But your lead actor wasn’t one of your problems? Costner: I am a better actor now than I was. I’ve consciously tried to become better — but I typically don’t give myself as much time as the other actors. And it takes somebody else to say, “Why don’t you give yourself another take?” But nobody was indulged on this movie. I didn’t move until I thought I had it. But as I’ve been in that editorial process, I can’t tell you how many times when I’ve seen a scene as I’m editing it, and I think, “Okay, that’s really good. Let’s see the second take.” And I get this dumb look from my editors and they go, “That’s all there is, one take.” And so I’ve got coverage — as you can see, it blends together really well. But we were out there on the razor’s edge trying to get through those days when you’re not doing one scene a day, but doing three. C&I: I think it’s safe to say this has been a labor of love for you. I mean, you have mentioned HORIZON *to me as a dream project several times over the years. And at one point, you even said, “This might even be three movies.” Well, you’ve kind of upped the ante a little bit, haven’t you?* Costner: Well, as Mark Twain said, “He didn’t exaggerate, he just remembered big.” It went to four — what can I say? It’s a labor of love. And the reality is, I don’t fall out of love with something I think is good. I just continue to push it. I mean, the wisdom of having the first one, written in 1988, be essentially rejected — nobody saw any value in it — and me turning around and not putting it in the drawer, but instead come out firing and write four more is kind of ... I don’t know. That’s probably therapy stuff, right? Somebody might say, “Why would you do that?” I mean, conventional wisdom was not allowing this movie to be made. But that being said, my feeling about conventional wisdom is: What if everybody’s wrong? C&I: Do you think if Yellowstone had not come along and become as popular as it has, you might still be out there beating the bushes trying to find somebody to back HORIZON? Costner: No, not at all. Because I used my own money this time. Nobody beat the door down for the four. They rejected all four. I put my own money up. I was just going to do it because I realized I needed to work more. I lost a whole year when we didn’t work on Yellowstone. And I realized that couldn’t happen again. And so I just recommitted myself to HORIZON, essentially burned my ships, and I realized it was time to do this for, really, a lot of reasons. C&I: Such as? Costner: I just thought it was a really good offering. And that’s really what I’m in the business for, to offer up a level of entertainment that gets over my bar, that I think can entertain not only the person watching it opening weekend, but somebody watching it 30 years from now. C&I: How difficult has it been for you to focus on the task at hand, which is in effect making two movies and finishing them to be released in the same year? I don’t have to tell you, you’ve had your personal life in the tabloids. You’ve had your professional life in the tabloids. How do you decide not to talk about the divorce, or Yellowstone, *and simply focus on making this scene match that scene?* Costner: Well, people are going to write what they want to write, and people are responsible for what they say in these things. And I look at what’s being said in many instances, and I know the truth, but I don’t feel the need to try to set the record straight every time there’s something going on. I mean, now I can talk about these things because we’re talking about them within the lines with my movie. I don’t try to live in the press outside of making movies. But when people are saying all these things, you don’t really see me say much. I know what’s true. And you can read between the lines. Like, you never thought I’m really a person who only wanted to work one week [on Yellowstone]? You don’t believe that was true? C&I: [Laughs] No, Kevin, I really don’t. Costner: So, I could tell you exactly how that came about, but that’s simply not the truth. And I’m always kind of disappointed that people can’t set the record straight. That’s just simply not true. I had given Yellowstone 25 days in November and December [of 2022], 25 days of my shooting, but the scripts never came. I gave them the month of March per a contract, and the scripts didn’t come. So, I really am going to make my movie, because I have 300 people waiting. So, I said, “Look, I will stop for a week before I start to shoot. And if you want to kill me, or you want to do something elegant for the show, because I love the show — I’ll give you a week.” So for them to take that gesture, and that’s all that was — and look, I don’t know any director that would take a week off before he started shooting, but I gave them the most valuable thing I had, which was time, three different times. And to turn around and use that as a statement against me is disappointing. And it was disappointing that nobody on that side would come out and say, “That’s just simply not true. He offered that as a gesture when we couldn’t figure out how to do things.” C&I: So basically what you’re saying is because of the Yellowstone *production delays ...* Costner: Let’s get the scripts, let’s go do it. But it’s hard to write that much. And there’s a tremendous load on [producer and series co-creator Taylor Sheridan], but I have to take care of myself. Make no mistake, I love Yellowstone. I love the people that love it. I wanted to keep making that and making this movie. I didn’t do HORIZON because I wasn’t doing Yellowstone anymore. I did HORIZON because I wanted to do HORIZON while I was doing Yellowstone. Yellowstone had a first position, and in each instance, it was negotiated for. I gave them a preferential spot every time. Every time. So I felt like I needed somebody on that side to speak up and say that version, and they never did. I don’t know why. I don’t know why that was so hard. It just confused the cast and it confused the people who love the show. C&I: While we’re talking, they still haven’t started filming the final Season 5 episodes of Yellowstone. *Is it reasonable to expect you’ll make some sort of appearance in at least one of them?* Costner: I don’t know that it’s reasonable. I know I’m open to it, but I don’t know that it’s reasonable to think that it can happen. I don’t have anything to do with how they are doing things. I like the character. I’d love to see it go on. I’d love for it to continue to be inventive. C&I: Let’s get back to HORIZON. Back when I interviewed you for our cover story on OPEN RANGE (2003), you mentioned that HOW THE WEST WAS WON (1962) was one of your all-time favorite westerns, not only because it had spectacle, but a love story as well. How much did HOW THE WEST WAS WON influence you while making HORIZON *?* Costner: Well, I saw HOW THE WEST WAS WON when I was seven. And I think if it could engage a 7-year-old boy to not look at his watch, and be able to watch the screen on his own, it just informed me that if things are interesting, if they’re compelling, if the screen picture is continuing to change and when it changes, it changes to something equally interesting, and then it starts to form a weave and suddenly these things that you were willing to watch on an individual basis began to somehow get closer and closer together, and then all of a sudden you see intersections — I love that kind of storytelling. And that’s what I have tried to do with HORIZON. C&I: So you finished the first two, is that correct? Or are you still editing the second film? Costner: Yeah, I’m looking to finish the montage for the end of [PART] 2. Just the way you saw a montage happen at the end of [PART] 1 — it advances things — this material has to be pulled from [PART] 3. So I was actually writing [PART] 3 when I walked over here to talk with you. I was starting to bend the scene to my will. C&I: When will you know for certain you can go ahead with [PARTS] 3 and 4? Costner: Well, you know for certain I’m going to make them. C&I: There you go, C&I readers! You’ve heard it straight from Kevin Costner himself! Costner: [Laughs] But it’s not an easy task to go out and find that kind of money. I’ve run out of property I can mortgage. I mean, I see where it says something like I have $20 million into the film, right? You’ve read that. C&I: Yes, but ... Costner: Well, it’s not — it’s $38 million, okay? Cash. It’s $38 million. And if it has to be, it will be more. You might ask yourself, “A person who writes [PART] 4 when no one liked [PART] 1? What is it going to take for you to get the message?” But to me, it’s like, I will look and see what I own and maybe keep a few things that I won’t forfeit, but I don’t want to hold onto things so tight that I can’t accomplish the things I want to accomplish. Maybe the reason I have some nice things that I could risk is because this is the life I chose, and so I can identify the amount of things I need, what my family needs. But some of these other things, for as much as I’ve worked for them, and hard, I’m also not going to be a slave and hold onto them and let something else that I’m trying to do suffer when they’re sitting right there. You could, biblically speaking, look at them and go, that’s why they were there. And I’m not going to lose it. I’m going to make it. I’m going to look at those graves where those people are on the side of the road, and I’m not going to be with them, Joe. I’m going to get there. This cover story appeared in our July 2024 issue. PHOTOGRAPHY: Richard Foreman, Courtesy Warner Bros. Pictures |
2024.05.20 02:25 RodeoBoss66 Kevin Costner: No Bull, No Compromises
 | https://www.cowboysindians.com/2024/05/kevin-costner-no-bull-no-compromises/ submitted by RodeoBoss66 to YellowstonePN [link] [comments] by Joe Leydon May 14, 2024 At the heart of HORIZON: AN AMERICAN SAGA, the prodigiously ambitious and dramatically potent western epic starring and directed by Kevin Costner, there is a scene where the commander of a far-flung 1860s Army post (Danny Huston) explains to a concerned subordinate (Sam Worthington) why, despite the rigors of overland travel by wagon train, and despite the repeated attacks by Indians who are understandably protective of their land, nothing will stop the seemingly endless waves of pioneers bent on settling the West. “These people,” the commander says, not entirely sympathetically, “think that if they’re tough enough, smart enough, and mean enough, all this will be theirs someday. There’s no army of this earth that will stop those wagons coming. Little as they be wanted.” But what will happen when those hearty pioneers see along the sides of the trail the countless graves of those who went before them, and didn’t survive the journey? The commander shrugs. The newcomers will think they’re luckier, and that they’ll survive and thrive. “And you know what?” he adds. “Some of them will.” Costner intends HORIZON as ultimately a series of four films — with the first two opening this summer, June 28 and August 16 — that, while focusing on a roughly 15-year period before and after the Civil War, will dramatize, even-handedly and excitingly, how the allure and promise of new lives in a new land fueled an unshakable belief in what has become known, for better or worse, as Manifest Destiny. Some of the characters journey westward to fulfill dreams. Others move along to escape lives that have become nightmares. And still others — specifically, the Native Americans who inhabit the lands that the settlers covet — must cope with the repeated appearances by these intruders. Some live. Some die. And, yes, some kill. Costner earns his top billing in HORIZON with his meticulously understated yet richly detailed performance as Hayes Ellison, the traditionally laconic western protagonist who never goes looking for trouble — goes out of his way to avoid it, actually — yet finds it follows him like a faithful dog. But he is just first among many in an exceptional ensemble cast that also includes (in Part 1) Sienna Miller, Sam Worthington, Giovanni Ribisi, Jena Malone, Abbey Lee, Michael Rooker, Danny Huston, Luke Wilson, Isabelle Fuhrman, Jeff Fahey, Will Patton, Tatanka Means, Owen Crow Shoe, Ella Hunt, and Jamie Campbell Bower. I caught up with Costner in March — by sheer coincidence, the 33rd anniversary of the night he won Oscar gold as Best Director of Best Picture winner DANCES WITH WOLVES (1990) — just as he was putting the finishing touches on HORIZON: AN AMERICAN SAGA, PART II. Since he’d recently been under so much pressure while making not just one but two epics while avoiding tabloid reports about his possible departure from the popular TV series Yellowstone and the breakup of his 20-year marriage, I figured it might be a great idea to break the ice with a different spin on a predictable question. Cowboys & Indians: So, it’s been quite a while since you directed this actor, Kevin Costner. Since the terrific 2003 western Open Range, *as a matter of fact. Has he learned anything since you last worked with him?* Kevin Costner: [Laughs] It’s really hard to know. I mean, I look at this movie, and the thing that stands out to me is not what I’ve learned, but maybe what I’ve brought to bear in getting it shot in 52 days. I shot DANCES in 106, WYATT EARP (1994) was about 115, and we did this in 52 — and it’s actually as big if not bigger than both of those. C&I: But your lead actor wasn’t one of your problems? Costner: I am a better actor now than I was. I’ve consciously tried to become better — but I typically don’t give myself as much time as the other actors. And it takes somebody else to say, “Why don’t you give yourself another take?” But nobody was indulged on this movie. I didn’t move until I thought I had it. But as I’ve been in that editorial process, I can’t tell you how many times when I’ve seen a scene as I’m editing it, and I think, “Okay, that’s really good. Let’s see the second take.” And I get this dumb look from my editors and they go, “That’s all there is, one take.” And so I’ve got coverage — as you can see, it blends together really well. But we were out there on the razor’s edge trying to get through those days when you’re not doing one scene a day, but doing three. C&I: I think it’s safe to say this has been a labor of love for you. I mean, you have mentioned HORIZON *to me as a dream project several times over the years. And at one point, you even said, “This might even be three movies.” Well, you’ve kind of upped the ante a little bit, haven’t you?* Costner: Well, as Mark Twain said, “He didn’t exaggerate, he just remembered big.” It went to four — what can I say? It’s a labor of love. And the reality is, I don’t fall out of love with something I think is good. I just continue to push it. I mean, the wisdom of having the first one, written in 1988, be essentially rejected — nobody saw any value in it — and me turning around and not putting it in the drawer, but instead come out firing and write four more is kind of ... I don’t know. That’s probably therapy stuff, right? Somebody might say, “Why would you do that?” I mean, conventional wisdom was not allowing this movie to be made. But that being said, my feeling about conventional wisdom is: What if everybody’s wrong? C&I: Do you think if Yellowstone had not come along and become as popular as it has, you might still be out there beating the bushes trying to find somebody to back HORIZON? Costner: No, not at all. Because I used my own money this time. Nobody beat the door down for the four. They rejected all four. I put my own money up. I was just going to do it because I realized I needed to work more. I lost a whole year when we didn’t work on Yellowstone. And I realized that couldn’t happen again. And so I just recommitted myself to HORIZON, essentially burned my ships, and I realized it was time to do this for, really, a lot of reasons. C&I: Such as? Costner: I just thought it was a really good offering. And that’s really what I’m in the business for, to offer up a level of entertainment that gets over my bar, that I think can entertain not only the person watching it opening weekend, but somebody watching it 30 years from now. C&I: How difficult has it been for you to focus on the task at hand, which is in effect making two movies and finishing them to be released in the same year? I don’t have to tell you, you’ve had your personal life in the tabloids. You’ve had your professional life in the tabloids. How do you decide not to talk about the divorce, or Yellowstone, *and simply focus on making this scene match that scene?* Costner: Well, people are going to write what they want to write, and people are responsible for what they say in these things. And I look at what’s being said in many instances, and I know the truth, but I don’t feel the need to try to set the record straight every time there’s something going on. I mean, now I can talk about these things because we’re talking about them within the lines with my movie. I don’t try to live in the press outside of making movies. But when people are saying all these things, you don’t really see me say much. I know what’s true. And you can read between the lines. Like, you never thought I’m really a person who only wanted to work one week [on Yellowstone]? You don’t believe that was true? C&I: [Laughs] No, Kevin, I really don’t. Costner: So, I could tell you exactly how that came about, but that’s simply not the truth. And I’m always kind of disappointed that people can’t set the record straight. That’s just simply not true. I had given Yellowstone 25 days in November and December [of 2022], 25 days of my shooting, but the scripts never came. I gave them the month of March per a contract, and the scripts didn’t come. So, I really am going to make my movie, because I have 300 people waiting. So, I said, “Look, I will stop for a week before I start to shoot. And if you want to kill me, or you want to do something elegant for the show, because I love the show — I’ll give you a week.” So for them to take that gesture, and that’s all that was — and look, I don’t know any director that would take a week off before he started shooting, but I gave them the most valuable thing I had, which was time, three different times. And to turn around and use that as a statement against me is disappointing. And it was disappointing that nobody on that side would come out and say, “That’s just simply not true. He offered that as a gesture when we couldn’t figure out how to do things.” C&I: So basically what you’re saying is because of the Yellowstone *production delays ...* Costner: Let’s get the scripts, let’s go do it. But it’s hard to write that much. And there’s a tremendous load on [producer and series co-creator Taylor Sheridan], but I have to take care of myself. Make no mistake, I love Yellowstone. I love the people that love it. I wanted to keep making that and making this movie. I didn’t do HORIZON because I wasn’t doing Yellowstone anymore. I did HORIZON because I wanted to do HORIZON while I was doing Yellowstone. Yellowstone had a first position, and in each instance, it was negotiated for. I gave them a preferential spot every time. Every time. So I felt like I needed somebody on that side to speak up and say that version, and they never did. I don’t know why. I don’t know why that was so hard. It just confused the cast and it confused the people who love the show. C&I: While we’re talking, they still haven’t started filming the final Season 5 episodes of Yellowstone. *Is it reasonable to expect you’ll make some sort of appearance in at least one of them?* Costner: I don’t know that it’s reasonable. I know I’m open to it, but I don’t know that it’s reasonable to think that it can happen. I don’t have anything to do with how they are doing things. I like the character. I’d love to see it go on. I’d love for it to continue to be inventive. C&I: Let’s get back to HORIZON. Back when I interviewed you for our cover story on OPEN RANGE (2003), you mentioned that HOW THE WEST WAS WON (1962) was one of your all-time favorite westerns, not only because it had spectacle, but a love story as well. How much did HOW THE WEST WAS WON influence you while making HORIZON *?* Costner: Well, I saw HOW THE WEST WAS WON when I was seven. And I think if it could engage a 7-year-old boy to not look at his watch, and be able to watch the screen on his own, it just informed me that if things are interesting, if they’re compelling, if the screen picture is continuing to change and when it changes, it changes to something equally interesting, and then it starts to form a weave and suddenly these things that you were willing to watch on an individual basis began to somehow get closer and closer together, and then all of a sudden you see intersections — I love that kind of storytelling. And that’s what I have tried to do with HORIZON. C&I: So you finished the first two, is that correct? Or are you still editing the second film? Costner: Yeah, I’m looking to finish the montage for the end of [PART] 2. Just the way you saw a montage happen at the end of [PART] 1 — it advances things — this material has to be pulled from [PART] 3. So I was actually writing [PART] 3 when I walked over here to talk with you. I was starting to bend the scene to my will. C&I: When will you know for certain you can go ahead with [PARTS] 3 and 4? Costner: Well, you know for certain I’m going to make them. C&I: There you go, C&I readers! You’ve heard it straight from Kevin Costner himself! Costner: [Laughs] But it’s not an easy task to go out and find that kind of money. I’ve run out of property I can mortgage. I mean, I see where it says something like I have $20 million into the film, right? You’ve read that. C&I: Yes, but ... Costner: Well, it’s not — it’s $38 million, okay? Cash. It’s $38 million. And if it has to be, it will be more. You might ask yourself, “A person who writes [PART] 4 when no one liked [PART] 1? What is it going to take for you to get the message?” But to me, it’s like, I will look and see what I own and maybe keep a few things that I won’t forfeit, but I don’t want to hold onto things so tight that I can’t accomplish the things I want to accomplish. Maybe the reason I have some nice things that I could risk is because this is the life I chose, and so I can identify the amount of things I need, what my family needs. But some of these other things, for as much as I’ve worked for them, and hard, I’m also not going to be a slave and hold onto them and let something else that I’m trying to do suffer when they’re sitting right there. You could, biblically speaking, look at them and go, that’s why they were there. And I’m not going to lose it. I’m going to make it. I’m going to look at those graves where those people are on the side of the road, and I’m not going to be with them, Joe. I’m going to get there. This cover story appeared in our July 2024 issue. PHOTOGRAPHY: Richard Foreman, Courtesy Warner Bros. Pictures |
2024.05.20 02:19 campionesidd Ranking all Juventus Jeep kits from worst to best.
With Jeep's shirt sponsorship due to end imminently, I decided to rank all the Jeep kits we've had over the years. These include all home, away and third kits since the 2012-13 season, but exclude any special edition or one-off kits. Of course, these are my subjective rankings, so I don't expect anyone to agree with this 100%, so feel free to voice your own opinions.
Starting off with the worst kits:
36) 2021-22 Third kit. By far the worst Juventus kit with the Jeep logo in my opinion. While it uses classic Juve colors like yellow and blue- the overly bright yellow and the horrible design make it ugly for an amateur kit, let alone on one of the biggest teams in Europe.
35) 2019-20 Home: The worst Home kit on this list. It made a total mockery of Juve's classic black and white stripes and replaced them with an unappealing half white/ half black shirt with a pink ribbon in the middle. While this might not have been a terrible third kit, it was an absolute travesty to have had it as a home jersey.
34) 2017-18 Third: An unappealing olive green kit with a horizontal white band that completely seems out of place. Highly forgettable.
33) 2023-24 Home: In previous years, Adidas has done a stellar job of incorporating yellow into the mix and complementing it well with other colors, but in this instance, the yellow clashes with the black and white stripes and makes it look like a mess.
32) 2016-17 Third: The infamous zebra kit. While the zebra design on the sleeves itself doesn't look too bad, it doesn't go well with the completely bland and uninspiring white of the rest of the shirt.
31) 2020-21 Third: While the orange color looks good, the black spots look like smudges of ink and ruin the overall appearance of the jersey.
30) 2018-19 Home: The black and white stripes are too narrow, and the Jeep sticker is slapped on top of it.
29) 2019-20 Away: Not a bad looking kit by any means, but the white kit and the red lettering are very unremarkable and forgettable.
28) 2012-13 Away: An otherwise good looking kit whose ranking is knocked down several spots due to the ugly Jeep sticker which sticks out, and not in a good way.
27) 2012-13 Third: Just like the kit below it in this ranking it is ruined by the awkward placement of the Jeep logo.
26) 2013-14 Third: Plain and boring black kit. Not much to see here.
25) 2022-23 Home: A controversial jersey. Some people loved this jersey and others hated it. Personally I think it looks good from a distance, but isn't pretty from up close.
24) 2023-24 Third: A greyish black jersey that is decent looking, but a very forgettable one.
23) 2020-21 Away: From here on out, we start getting to the decent looking kits and jerseys. This is another forgettable entry in the list. The dark blue color looks nice, but there's nothing that stands out about this kit.
22) 2015-16 Home: Another kit that divides opinion. The stripes are too narrow for my liking.
21) 2018-19 Away: A very clean, crisp beige design that stands out simply because we're not used to seeing this color on a Juventus jersey.
20) 2014-15 Third: Another unconventional Juve color, but I like the clean bright green design. This kit belongs firmly in the middle of the pack.
19) 2016-17 Home: A slightly unconventional design for a home kit. Would've ranked higher if the Jeep sticker was incorporated more gracefully.
18) 2018-19 Third: Very similar to the gorgeous 2015-16 kit, this beautiful jersey loses a few spots for being not very distinct from it.
17) 2019-20 Third: Most of Juve's blue kits are easy on this eye, and this one is no different.
16) 2022-23 Away: A sleek black kit with an electrifying Jeep logo, but not a very memorable one.
15) 2012-13 Home: The very first Juve home jersey with a Jeep logo. The collar looks nice, but like other early Jeep designs, the Jeep logo placement isn't done very well.
14) 2014-15 Home: A classy and timeless home kit, which will be remembered favorably for years to come due to Juve's incredible season that year.
13) 2022-23 Third: Juve returning to its pink roots yet again. This kit gets a high rating due to its intricate design although few people will remember it in the coming years due to Juve's miserable season on and off the pitch.
12) 2017-18 Away: Yellow and blue are classic Juve colors, but this kit's similarity to the 2013-14 kit leaves it out of the top 10 list.
11) 2016-17 Away: I have fond memories of this pretty two-tone blue kit, as Juve had another memorable season in Italy and Europe with it.
10) 2023-24 Away: One of the few horizontally striped jerseys on this list. I appreciate the effort to make a design that stands out from the rest. The pink and grey stripes complement each other nicely
9) 2013-14 Home: This is what a Juventus home jersey should look like. Perfectly spaced stripes, and a great collar and simple sleeves. Not ranked near the very top due to the intrusive Jeep sticker.
8) 2015-16 Away kit: The highest ranked pink kit in this list. Would've been perfect with a better Jeep logo.
7) 2021-22 Home kit: Excellent kit. The only thing I don't like about it is the horizontal Adidas stripes on the top.
6) 2013-14 Away: The Yellow shirt and blue shorts are done to perfection. If you wear this shirt, make sure it to wear blue jeans or blue shorts to match the color combo.
5) 2021-22 Away: Very visually striking jersey, and one which you can wear casually and look great in. I actually like the Adidas stripes on this one.
4) 2020-21 Home: The gold lettering and logos look really nice on the home shirt. A huge improvement over the dreadful 2018-19/ and 2019-20 jerseys.
3) 2017-18 Home: The first Juve jersey without the classic Juventus logo, but the classy design of the collar and the gold touches more than make up for it. The best Juve home jersey in a long time in my opinion.
2) 2014-15 Away: Reminiscent of the 1995-96 Juventus away jersey, this stunning kit also brought us many memorable moments in the Champions League. This was one of the last kits Nike designed for us, and they certainly made sure they signed off on a high note
1) 2015-16 Third: The black and gold combo is sublime. The Jeep logo is tastefully done, and the classic Juve logo is converted to a black and gold scheme which looks gorgeous. Adidas hit a home run with this one.
Based on the average ranking of each kit, the seasons with the best kits are
submitted by campionesidd to Juve [link] [comments]
Starting off with the worst kits:
36) 2021-22 Third kit. By far the worst Juventus kit with the Jeep logo in my opinion. While it uses classic Juve colors like yellow and blue- the overly bright yellow and the horrible design make it ugly for an amateur kit, let alone on one of the biggest teams in Europe.
35) 2019-20 Home: The worst Home kit on this list. It made a total mockery of Juve's classic black and white stripes and replaced them with an unappealing half white/ half black shirt with a pink ribbon in the middle. While this might not have been a terrible third kit, it was an absolute travesty to have had it as a home jersey.
34) 2017-18 Third: An unappealing olive green kit with a horizontal white band that completely seems out of place. Highly forgettable.
33) 2023-24 Home: In previous years, Adidas has done a stellar job of incorporating yellow into the mix and complementing it well with other colors, but in this instance, the yellow clashes with the black and white stripes and makes it look like a mess.
32) 2016-17 Third: The infamous zebra kit. While the zebra design on the sleeves itself doesn't look too bad, it doesn't go well with the completely bland and uninspiring white of the rest of the shirt.
31) 2020-21 Third: While the orange color looks good, the black spots look like smudges of ink and ruin the overall appearance of the jersey.
30) 2018-19 Home: The black and white stripes are too narrow, and the Jeep sticker is slapped on top of it.
29) 2019-20 Away: Not a bad looking kit by any means, but the white kit and the red lettering are very unremarkable and forgettable.
28) 2012-13 Away: An otherwise good looking kit whose ranking is knocked down several spots due to the ugly Jeep sticker which sticks out, and not in a good way.
27) 2012-13 Third: Just like the kit below it in this ranking it is ruined by the awkward placement of the Jeep logo.
26) 2013-14 Third: Plain and boring black kit. Not much to see here.
25) 2022-23 Home: A controversial jersey. Some people loved this jersey and others hated it. Personally I think it looks good from a distance, but isn't pretty from up close.
24) 2023-24 Third: A greyish black jersey that is decent looking, but a very forgettable one.
23) 2020-21 Away: From here on out, we start getting to the decent looking kits and jerseys. This is another forgettable entry in the list. The dark blue color looks nice, but there's nothing that stands out about this kit.
22) 2015-16 Home: Another kit that divides opinion. The stripes are too narrow for my liking.
21) 2018-19 Away: A very clean, crisp beige design that stands out simply because we're not used to seeing this color on a Juventus jersey.
20) 2014-15 Third: Another unconventional Juve color, but I like the clean bright green design. This kit belongs firmly in the middle of the pack.
19) 2016-17 Home: A slightly unconventional design for a home kit. Would've ranked higher if the Jeep sticker was incorporated more gracefully.
18) 2018-19 Third: Very similar to the gorgeous 2015-16 kit, this beautiful jersey loses a few spots for being not very distinct from it.
17) 2019-20 Third: Most of Juve's blue kits are easy on this eye, and this one is no different.
16) 2022-23 Away: A sleek black kit with an electrifying Jeep logo, but not a very memorable one.
15) 2012-13 Home: The very first Juve home jersey with a Jeep logo. The collar looks nice, but like other early Jeep designs, the Jeep logo placement isn't done very well.
14) 2014-15 Home: A classy and timeless home kit, which will be remembered favorably for years to come due to Juve's incredible season that year.
13) 2022-23 Third: Juve returning to its pink roots yet again. This kit gets a high rating due to its intricate design although few people will remember it in the coming years due to Juve's miserable season on and off the pitch.
12) 2017-18 Away: Yellow and blue are classic Juve colors, but this kit's similarity to the 2013-14 kit leaves it out of the top 10 list.
11) 2016-17 Away: I have fond memories of this pretty two-tone blue kit, as Juve had another memorable season in Italy and Europe with it.
10) 2023-24 Away: One of the few horizontally striped jerseys on this list. I appreciate the effort to make a design that stands out from the rest. The pink and grey stripes complement each other nicely
9) 2013-14 Home: This is what a Juventus home jersey should look like. Perfectly spaced stripes, and a great collar and simple sleeves. Not ranked near the very top due to the intrusive Jeep sticker.
8) 2015-16 Away kit: The highest ranked pink kit in this list. Would've been perfect with a better Jeep logo.
7) 2021-22 Home kit: Excellent kit. The only thing I don't like about it is the horizontal Adidas stripes on the top.
6) 2013-14 Away: The Yellow shirt and blue shorts are done to perfection. If you wear this shirt, make sure it to wear blue jeans or blue shorts to match the color combo.
5) 2021-22 Away: Very visually striking jersey, and one which you can wear casually and look great in. I actually like the Adidas stripes on this one.
4) 2020-21 Home: The gold lettering and logos look really nice on the home shirt. A huge improvement over the dreadful 2018-19/ and 2019-20 jerseys.
3) 2017-18 Home: The first Juve jersey without the classic Juventus logo, but the classy design of the collar and the gold touches more than make up for it. The best Juve home jersey in a long time in my opinion.
2) 2014-15 Away: Reminiscent of the 1995-96 Juventus away jersey, this stunning kit also brought us many memorable moments in the Champions League. This was one of the last kits Nike designed for us, and they certainly made sure they signed off on a high note
1) 2015-16 Third: The black and gold combo is sublime. The Jeep logo is tastefully done, and the classic Juve logo is converted to a black and gold scheme which looks gorgeous. Adidas hit a home run with this one.
Based on the average ranking of each kit, the seasons with the best kits are
- 2015-16
- 2014-15
- 2013-14
- 2019-20
- 2012-13
- 2018-19
2024.05.20 02:10 CaptainIronHammer1 Found my new QB
 | submitted by CaptainIronHammer1 to Football_GM [link] [comments] |
2024.05.20 02:07 SanderSo47 Directors at the Box Office: Clint Eastwood (Part 2)
 | https://preview.redd.it/va70nf0l3h1d1.png?width=1920&format=png&auto=webp&s=021d936ee0a724ca428d8559f5823592404d1822 submitted by SanderSo47 to boxoffice [link] [comments] As Reddit doesn't allow posts to exceed 40,000 characters, Eastwood's edition had to be split into two parts because his whole career cannot be ignored. The first part was posted yesterday.Million Dollar Baby (2004)¨"Beyond his silence, there is a past. Beyond her dreams, there is a feeling. Beyond hope, there is a memory. Beyond their journey, there is a love."His 25th film. Based on stories from the 2000 collection Rope Burns: Stories from the Corner by F.X. Toole, it stars Eastwood, Hilary Swank and Morgan Freeman. The film follows Margaret "Maggie" Fitzgerald, an underdog amateur boxer who is helped by an underappreciated boxing trainer to achieve her dream of becoming a professional. Paul Haggis wrote the script on spec, and it took four years to sell it. The film was stuck in development hell for years before it was shot. Several studios rejected the project even when Eastwood signed on as actor and director. Even Warner Bros., Eastwood's longtime home base, would not agree to a $30 million budget. Eastwood persuaded Lakeshore Entertainment's Tom Rosenberg to put up half the budget (as well as handle foreign distribution), with Warner Bros. contributing the rest. The film had an incredible run in limited release, breaking many records for Eastwood's career. It eventually earned a fantastic $216 million worldwide, becoming his highest grossing film ever. It received critical acclaim, and it was named as one of his greatest films. It won four Oscars: Best Picture, Best Director, Best Actress (for Swank), and Best Supporting Actor (for Freeman). Eastwood became one of the very few directors to make two films to win both Best Picture and Best Director.
Flags of Our Fathers (2006)"A single shot can end the war."His 26th film. Based on the book written by James Bradley and Ron Powers, it stars Ryan Phillippe, Jesse Bradford, Adam Beach, John Benjamin Hickey, John Slattery, Paul Walker, Jamie Bell, Barry Pepper, Robert Patrick and Neal McDonough. The film follows the 1945 Battle of Iwo Jima, the five Marines and one Navy corpsman who were involved in raising the flag on Iwo Jima, and the after effects of that event on their lives. The film received positive reviews, but it bombed at the box office with just $65 million against its huge $90 million budget.
Letters from Iwo Jima (2006)"The completion of the Iwo Jima saga."His 27th film. Based on Picture Letters from Commander in Chief by Tadamichi Kuribayashi, it stars Ken Watanabe, Kazunari Ninomiya, Tsuyoshi Ihara, Ryō Kase and Shidō Nakamura. It's a companion film to Flags of Our Fathers, and portrays the Battle of Iwo Jima from the perspective of the Japanese soldiers. In the process of reading about the Japanese perspective of the war for Flags of Our Fathers, in particular General Tadamichi Kuribayashi, Eastwood decided to film a companion piece with this film, which was shot entirely in Japanese. The film was shot back-to-back, starting filming just one month after Flags of Our Fathers wrapped filming. Despite being seen as the least accessible of both films, this film was much more successful at the box office than the previous film (including a colossal $42 million in Japan alone). It also received critical acclaim, particularly for how it handed the depiction of good and evil from both sides. It received 4 Oscar nominations, including Best Picture and Best Director.
Changeling (2008)"To find her son, she did what no one else dared."His 28th film. It stars Angelina Jolie and John Malkovich, and is based on real-life events, specifically the 1928 Wineville Chicken Coop murders in Mira Loma, California. It follows a woman united with a boy who she realizes is not her missing son. When she tries to demonstrate that to the police and city authorities, she is vilified as delusional, labeled as an unfit mother and confined to a psychiatric ward. The film earned $113 million worldwide, barely breaking even at the box office. The film received mixed reviews, but Jolie received praise for her performance. She was nominated for the Oscar for Best Actress.
Gran Torino (2008)"Ever come across somebody you shouldn't have messed with?"His 29th film. It stars Eastwood, and follows Walt Kowalski, a recently widowed Korean War veteran alienated from his family and angry at the world, whose young neighbor, Thao Vang Lor, is pressured by his cousin into stealing Walt's prized Ford Torino for his initiation into a gang. Walt thwarts the theft and subsequently develops a relationship with the boy and his family. The film received great reviews, as well as praise from the Hmong community. It ended up becoming a sleeper hit, and it earned $270 million worldwide, becoming his highest grossing film.
Invictus (2009)"His people needed a leader. He gave them a champion."His 30th film. It stars Morgan Freeman and Matt Damon. Following the aftermath of the apartheid, President Nelson Mandela decides to unite his people by supporting a rugby team in their bid to win the 1995 Rugby World Cup. The film earned $122 million worldwide, barely breaking even. It received positive reviews, and Freeman and Damon received Oscar nominations for their performances.
Hereafter (2010)"Touched by death. Changed by life."His 31st film. It stars Matt Damon, Cécile de France, Bryce Dallas Howard, Lyndsey Marshal, Jay Mohr and Thierry Neuvic. An American with a special connection to the afterlife, a woman with a near-death experience and a young English boy, who lost his loved ones, cross paths in an effort to find closure in their lives. Despite mixed reviews, it managed to earn $107 million, turning a small profit.
J. Edgar (2011)"The most powerful man in the world."His 32nd film. The film stars Leonardo DiCaprio, Armie Hammer, Naomi Watts, Josh Lucas, and Judi Dench, and follows the career of FBI director J. Edgar Hoover, focusing on Hoover's life from the 1919 Palmer Raids onward. The film received mixed reviews; while DiCaprio received praise, the technical aspects of the film were criticized. It earned $84 million, making it a box office success, but far below what DiCaprio usually makes at the box office.
Jersey Boys (2014)"Everybody remembers it how they need to."His 33rd film. Base on the 2004 jukebox musical, it stars John Lloyd Young, Erich Bergen, Michael Lomenda, Vincent Piazza and Christopher Walken, and tells the story of the musical group The Four Seasons. It received mixed reviews, with praise for the musical numbers but criticism for the narrative and runtime, and failed at the box office.
American Sniper (2014)"The most lethal sniper in U.S. history."His 34th film. It is based on the memoir by Chris Kyle, Scott McEwen and Jim DeFelice, and stars Bradley Cooper and Sienna Miller. The film follows the life of Kyle, who became the deadliest marksman in U.S. military history with 255 kills from four tours in the Iraq War, 160 of which were officially confirmed by the Department of Defense. While Kyle was celebrated for his military successes, his tours of duty took a heavy toll on his personal and family life. In 2012, Cooper and Warner Bros. bought the rights to the memoir. Cooper wanted Chris Pratt to star as Kyle, but WB told him they would only greenlight the film if he stars in it. After Kyle's murder in 2013, Steven Spielberg signed to direct. Spielberg had read Kyle's book, though he desired to have a more psychological conflict present in the screenplay so an "enemy sniper" character could serve as the insurgent sharpshooter who was trying to track down and kill Kyle. Spielberg's ideas contributed to the development of a lengthy screenplay approaching 160 pages. Due to Warner Bros.' budget constraints, Spielberg felt he could not bring his vision of the story to the screen. So Eastwood was brought in to direct. The film attained a solid, but not extraordinary response from critics. It also attracted some controversy over its portrayal of both the Iraq War and Kyle himself. The box office though? To say that the film had a fantastic run would be selling it short. It opened on Christmas Day in 4 theaters, and it earned a huge $633,456 ($158,364 PTA). But the following weekend, it actually increased despite playing at the same amount of theaters, adding $676,909. That translated to a $169,227 PTA, becoming the highest second weekend PTA in history for a live-action film. And on its third weekend, it earned $579,518 ($144,879 PTA), becoming the first film to have three weekends above $100,000 PTA. In the 22 days it played in just 4 theaters, it earned $3,424,778. On its first wide weekend, the film shook the industry by opening with a colossal $89 million. That was almost as much as the other 2014 blockbusters, and given that the film didn't have 3D pricing, it's very likely it sold far more tickets than them. It broke the January opening weekend record by twice as much, and the second biggest for an R-rated title. With insane word of mouth ("A+" on CinemaScore), this film had the legs. In less than one week, it became Eastwood's highest grossing film domestically. On its second weekend, it dropped just 28% and made $64 million, which was the biggest second weekend for an R-rated film (a record it still maintains) and crossed $200 million domestically. And by March, the film overtook The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 1 ($334 million) as the highest grossing 2014 film in North America. After an insane run in theaters, it closed with a gigantic $350 million domestically, which made it the second highest grossing R-rated film in North America. Overseas, it was also very strong, and it made a huge $547 million worldwide. It was easily Eastwood's highest grossing film, even adjusted for inflation. One of the greatest box office runs in recent memory. It received six Oscar nominations, including Best Picture, Best Adapted Screenplay, and Best Actor for Cooper, ultimately winning one for Best Sound Editing. The biggest surprise of the 2010s? Perhaps. Cause let's face it, when 2014, did any of you had this as the top film of the year? Or even in the Top 20? Please.
Sully (2016)"The untold story behind the miracle on the Hudson."His 35th film. Based on the autobiography Highest Duty by Chesley "Sully" Sullenberger and Jeffrey Skiles, it stars Tom Hanks, Aaron Eckhart, Laura Linney, Anna Gunn, Autumn Reeser, Holt McCallany, and Jamey Sheridan. The film follows Sullenberger's 2009 emergency landing of US Airways Flight 1549 on the Hudson River, in which all 155 passengers and crew survived and the subsequent publicity and investigation. The film received strong reviews, and earned over $240 million worldwide, becoming one of his highest grossing films.
The 15:17 to Paris (2018)"The real heroes."His 36th film. Based on the autobiography by Jeffrey E. Stern, Spencer Stone, Anthony Sadler, and Alek Skarlatos, it stars Stone, Sadler, and Skarlatos as themselves and follows the trio through life leading up to and including their stopping of the 2015 Thalys train attack. Despite choosing Kyle Gallner, Jeremie Harris and Alexander Ludwig as the leads, Eastwood decided to cast the heroes to play themselves, which was met with confusion as they lacked acting experience. And that was reflected on the final film; it received negative reviews for its acting, and it bombed at the box office.
The Mule (2018)"Nobody runs forever."His 37th film. Based on the 2014 The New York Times article The Sinaloa Cartel's 90-Year-Old Drug Mule by Sam Dolnick, it stars Eastwood, Bradley Cooper, Laurence Fishburne, Michael Peña, Dianne Wiest, and Andy García. Due to financial issues, horticulturist Earl Stone becomes a courier for a drug cartel. Slowly, he grows closer to his estranged family, but his illegal activities threaten much more than his life. It received good reviews (although some questioned its story and tone), and earned over $173 million worldwide.
Richard Jewell (2019)"The world will know his name and the truth."His 38th film. The film stars Paul Walter Hauser, Sam Rockwell, Kathy Bates, Jon Hamm, and Olivia Wilde. The film depicts the July 27 Centennial Olympic Park bombing and its aftermath, as security guard Richard Jewell finds a bomb during the 1996 Summer Olympics in Atlanta, Georgia, and alerts authorities to evacuate, only to later be wrongly accused of having placed the device himself. The film received positive reviews, but several journalists criticized the critical portrayal of the reporter that first accused Jewell: Kathy Scruggs (specifically for trading sex for stories). The film marked another commercial failure for Eastwood.
Cry Macho (2021)"A story of being lost and found."His 39th film. Based on the novel by N. Richard Nash, it stars Eastwood and Dwight Yoakam. Set in 1979, it follows a former rodeo star hired to reunite a young boy in Mexico with his father in the United States. Nash tried to get this film made all the way since 1970s, but no studio was willing to pick it up. He restructured his films as a novel, was successful and studios were now interested. There were a few candidates for the leading role; Robert Mitchum, Roy Scheider, Arnold Schwarzenegger and Eastwood himself. Arnie was willing to star in the film back in 2003, but put it on hold when he was elected Governor. He was set to star after leaving office, but the project was scrapped after his affair scandal was made known. In 2020, Eastwood signed to return. The film received mixed reviews, particularly for its writing and acting. It was also a huge flop at the box office, and marked Eastwood's least attended film as leading man. David Zaslav criticized the studio's decision to finance the film. Warner executives allegedly said that although they knew the film was unlikely to turn a profit, they felt indebted to Eastwood for his decades-long relationship with the studio and his consistent ability to deliver films under budget and on time.
The FutureHe recently wrapped post-production on his 40th film, Juror No. 2. It stars Nicholas Hoult, Toni Collette, Zoey Deutch, Leslie Bibb, Chris Messina, J. K. Simmons and Kiefer Sutherland, and follows a juror serving on a murder trial who realizes he may be at fault for the victim's death.MOVIES (FROM HIGHEST GROSSING TO LEAST GROSSING)
The VerdictInsanely profitable.Even the bombs do not taint this kind of reputation. Eastwood has made all these films under budget and never past its deadline. That's something that has to be treasured for studios, no wonder he's been staying with Warner Bros. since 1976. His ability to get films ready in short notice is impressive; Richard Jewell started filming in June and it was on theaters in December. One of the most impressive actors who transitioned into directors. You can tell that Sergio Leone and Don Siegel taught him well. Now of course, his method of directing can also have its setbacks: he's often known for not asking for multiple takes and he skips rehearsals. So that means the performances of his actors aren't always the best they could've done. Which is why, despite making some masterpieces or fantastic films, he's also made a few films with weak technical aspects: poor lighting (J. Edgar), questionable logic (Cry Macho), obvious props (the fake baby in American Sniper), and some bad acting (Gran Torino and The 15:17 to Paris). At the same time, it's clear he can also get extraordinary performances through these methods; Gene Hackman, Sean Penn, Tim Robbins, Hilary Swank and Morgan Freeman won Oscars for starring in his films. He also proved old age doesn't prevent you from continuing to work. He's turning 94 in a few weeks, and he's still directing films. Manoel de Oliveira directed films until he was 104, so perhaps we still have a few more years with Eastwood behind the camera. P.S. Ever since I started this series, there's been suggestions that I should do "Actors at the Box Office" multiple times. While the idea is intriguing, that doesn't seem feasible for me. I'd have to categorize whether the actor is leading, supporting, original IP, adaptation, remakes, etc. Besides, with the continuing decline of star power, it's tough to decide what actor is truly moving the needle at the box office. That's why I'm making solely "Directors at the Box Office", because the director is responsible for the production. If the film succeeds, the director will get credit. And if the film flops, the director will be blamed. So this is the closest you'll get to "Actors at the Box Office". Hope you liked this edition. You can find this and more in the wiki for this section. The next director will be Robert Zemeckis. One of the biggest falls from grace. I asked you to choose who else should be in the run and the comment with the most upvotes would be chosen. It had to be a controversial filmmaker. Well, we'll later talk about... Zack Snyder. Oh, BoxOffice chose fuego 🔥 This is the schedule for the following four:
|
2024.05.20 02:01 DarlingElysia Megathread Hub and Weekly Help Megathread
 | Welcome to the weekly help megathread chiefs!📷https://preview.redd.it/vs26h2nck3bc1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=97fcbaae301fc8f10455e79c352fde68a6730306Here feel free to ask any questions whether it be simple and complicated that will not warrant their own thread, we're all here to help our fellow chiefs! Questions can include but are not limited to:
Helpful resourcesPathToNowhere FAQ and WikiA collection of resources and support for new chiefs and frequently asked questionsDiscordHere we have dedicated channels for technical support and strategy help to help all chiefs new and old.Emerald's SheetA megasheet created by Chief Emerald that has everything you can imagine. If you have any questions, odds are it is already answered here. So definitely a must-read before proceeding further.Rabbit's SheetAn extremely detailed and well done write up of information about different elements of the game, mainly about sinners and BFL, and the supply office, written by Chief Rabbit.Also check out Rabbit's Guide Site! Official-supported Fandom WikiThe English Wiki for Path to Nowhere that is supported and aided by the official staff. New pages are added regularly so if there is anything you wish to see that might not be added yet, feel free to leave a suggestion!S1NS WikiA Fan-made wiki website that contains all sorts of things, from character info, guides, and tier lists, to an Arrest Calculator meant to help you plan your resources for future sinners.Other MegathreadsWeekly Gacha - Pulls - AchievementShare with the community the achievements you have earned or your luck arresting sinners Weekly Secret Society and Friend Request Here you can advertise your secret society to like-minded Chiefs and also add them to your friends list. Weekly Bug Report Report to us any bugs or technical issues that you have been facing with the global version of Path To Nowhere This thread is refreshed weekly (every Monday). Be sure to check the newest thread every week. |
2024.05.20 02:01 Soninetz Unbounce vs WordPress: Best Landing Page Platform
 | In the realm of website creation, the battle between Unbounce and WordPress, both known for their effective landing pages and landing page plugins, rages on. These platforms offer distinct advantages, specific features, and cater to different needs. Unbounce shines with its focus on landing pages and conversion optimization, while WordPress boasts versatility and a vast array of plugins for various functionalities and differences. Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of each can help you make an informed decision for your website needs. Let's delve into the details of Unbounce vs. WordPress to unravel which platform aligns best with your goals. submitted by Soninetz to AllPromos [link] [comments] Useful Links: Key Takeaways
Defining the PlatformsWordPressWordPress, a versatile platform, primarily serves as a content management system (CMS) for websites. It empowers users to create and manage websites effortlessly. With its extensive range of themes, plugins, templates, and customization options, WordPress caters to various needs, from personal blogs to e-commerce sites.UnbounceUnbounce stands out for its expertise in crafting high-converting landing pages. This platform focuses on optimizing conversion rates through A/B testing, drag-and-drop functionality, and mobile-responsive designs. Marketers and businesses leverage Unbounce to enhance their online marketing campaigns effectively by creating landing pages.https://preview.redd.it/1brb33mg2h1d1.png?width=792&format=png&auto=webp&s=dab663956e64d8363453eb0156c72ed252350c70 Transform leads into lasting connections 🤝 Begin your Unbounce Free Trial today! 💼 Founding HistoryWordPress was founded in 2003 by Matt Mullenweg and Mike Little. Initially developed as a blogging platform, it has evolved into a robust CMS powering millions of websites globally. On the other hand, Unbounce was established in 2009 by Rick Perreault, Carl Schmidt, Carter Gilchrist, Jason Murphy, and Oli Gardner. The founding team aimed to address the specific need for creating landing pages that drive conversions efficiently.Pros and Cons AnalysisOpen-SourceWordPress boasts an open-source nature, allowing extensive customization through plugins and themes. On the other hand, Unbounce focuses on specific features for streamlined landing page creation.Learning CurveFor beginners, WordPress can present a steep learning curve due to its vast array of options and settings. Conversely, Unbounce offers a more user-friendly interface with intuitive drag-and-drop functionality.Pricing StructuresWhen it comes to cost-effectiveness, Unbounce provides tiered pricing based on features and traffic volume. In contrast, WordPress offers a range of pricing options, including self-hosted solutions with varying costs for domains and hosting.Building Landing PagesCustomization OptionsUnbounce offers extensive customization through its drag-and-drop editor, allowing users to create custom landing pages effortlessly. This feature enables users to tailor their pages to specific needs.In contrast, WordPress provides a wide range of customization options with its themes and plugins, giving users the flexibility to design dedicated landing pages that align with their branding and goals. A/B Testing CapabilitiesWith Unbounce, users can conduct A/B testing to analyze different versions of their landing pages and determine which one performs better. This functionality is crucial for optimizing landing pages for maximum effectiveness.Optimizing for SuccessEnhanced EngagementUnbounce provides features like pop-ups and sticky bars to boost user engagement. These tools help marketers capture leads effectively.WordPress, on the other hand, offers a wide range of plugins that can enhance user interaction on websites, contributing to improved engagement. Useful Links: Security ComparisonBoth WordPress and Unbounce prioritize security for marketers. WordPress is known for its robust security measures through regular updates and plugin options.Similarly, Unbounce ensures data security with encryption protocols and secure hosting services, giving marketers peace of mind regarding their campaigns' safety. Streamlining WorkflowsUnbounce integrates seamlessly with various popular marketing tools, simplifying marketing workflows for professionals. This integration enhances efficiency in managing campaigns.In contrast, WordPress offers a vast array of plugins that can be integrated with different marketing tools, allowing marketers to customize their strategies effectively. Making the Right ChoiceLead GenerationUnbounce stands out as an excellent option for businesses focusing on lead generation. With its user-friendly interface and drag-and-drop functionality, creating high-converting landing pages becomes a breeze. The platform offers a variety of templates tailored specifically for capturing leads effectively.Diverse FunctionalitiesOn the other hand, WordPress is the preferred option for websites that require a wide range of functionalities beyond just landing pages. Its versatility allows users to create complex websites with features like e-commerce capabilities, blogging, forums, and much more. The platform's extensive plugin library enables customization options to cater to diverse needs.Cost ConsiderationsWhen deciding between Unbounce and WordPress, it's crucial to consider the cost implications. While Unbounce offers a straightforward pricing structure based on the number of visitors, WordPress provides more customisation options at a lower cost. Businesses with limited budgets may find WordPress more appealing due to its flexibility in making changes without additional expenses.Closing ThoughtsIn weighing Unbounce against WordPress for your landing page needs, you've seen the strengths and weaknesses of each platform. Now, armed with this knowledge, you can make an informed decision that aligns with your specific goals and skill level. Remember, the right choice isn't universal; it's what best suits your objectives.When building and optimizing landing pages, consider factors like ease of use, customization options, and scalability. By selecting the platform that resonates most with your requirements, you set yourself up for success in converting visitors into customers. So, take the insights gained here and embark on your journey to create compelling landing pages that drive results. Step into boundless marketing success 🌟 Start your Unbounce Free Trial now! 🎉 Frequently Asked QuestionsWhat is the difference between Unbounce and WordPress?Unbounce is a dedicated landing page builder focused on conversion optimization, while WordPress is a versatile content management system for websites of all types. Unbounce offers drag-and-drop functionality specifically for creating high-conversion landing pages, whereas WordPress provides a broader range of website building capabilities.Which platform is better suited for beginners - Unbounce or WordPress?For beginners looking to create landing pages with ease, Unbounce is more user-friendly due to its intuitive drag-and-drop interface designed for marketers. On the other hand, WordPress, while versatile, may have a steeper learning curve as it offers more customization options beyond just landing pages.Can I build a full website using Unbounce?Unbounce is primarily designed for creating high-converting landing pages rather than complete websites. While you can link multiple landing pages together to form a simple site structure, it lacks the comprehensive features and flexibility offered by platforms like WordPress and unbounce for building entire websites with diverse functionalities.How does each platform handle optimization for search engines (SEO)?WordPress has robust SEO plugins and tools that allow users to optimize their website's on-page elements effectively. In comparison, while Unbounce provides basic SEO settings like meta tags and descriptions, its focus is primarily on optimizing landing page performance rather than offering extensive SEO capabilities like WordPress.Which platform would be more cost-effective in the long run - Unbounce or WordPress?In terms of cost-effectiveness, WordPress may have an edge as it offers more affordable hosting options and numerous free themes and plugins. While Unbounce can be pricier due to its subscription-based model focused on optimizing conversions through dedicated landing pages.Useful Links: |
2024.05.20 02:00 AutoModerator Help and Question Megathread - Week of May 20, 2024
Welcome, everybody, to the help and question thread!
Wondering whether or not you should pull for a certain character, who you should limit break, or how to beat a certain challenge? Ask here!
Let's just set up the ground rules:
submitted by AutoModerator to touhou_lostword [link] [comments]
Wondering whether or not you should pull for a certain character, who you should limit break, or how to beat a certain challenge? Ask here!
General Resources:
GL Resources:
JP Resources:
- JP Tier Lists - Option 1 - Option 2 - Option 3
- JP Prayer Schedule
- JP Event Schedule
- JP Skin List
Useful Links:
- Farming Guide
- Switch link bonus chart with Lore Relations
- Touhou Lost Word Spellcard and Bullet Guide
- Anomaly Breaker and Special Interactions List Character Last Word Speed List
- Assume good faith - Assume that the player really doesn't know and try to help them out. In the event of trolls, either downvote, ignore, or report them to the moderators.
- Have patience - Your question may not be answered immediately, but please wait for a bit before asking again. Do not post a new thread on the sub for the question. Repeat offenders will be warned or punished.
- Keep jokes in moderation - While it's okay to joke around, this thread is intended for learning and we ask that you keep that in mind.
2024.05.20 02:00 AutoModerator Weekly Help & Questions Megathread
Welcome to the weekly Help & Questions Megathread!
This thread is for support and questions that don't warrant their own thread, and will be refreshed every week on Monday at 00:00 UTC.
submitted by AutoModerator to AlchemyStarsEN [link] [comments]
This thread is for support and questions that don't warrant their own thread, and will be refreshed every week on Monday at 00:00 UTC.
Resources:
- Official FAQ
- Community FAQ
- kimaris.gg/alchemystars - character database, tracker, etc.
- Alchemy Stars Fandom Wiki - community wiki
- Beginner's List of Terminology and Abbreviations by u/pitanger
- The Alchemy Stars Community Tier List by Team BethelFrankel
Guides:
- Reroll and Progression Guide: Juliwen's Guide 2.0
- Alchemy Stars Beginner Guide by Team BethelFrankel
- Alchemy Stars Advanced Guide by Team BethelFrankel
Support:
- Customer Support: help@alchemystars.com
- Feedback Thread (not for bug reports)
- Bugs & Issues Thread (reports only, not support)
2024.05.20 01:56 jobe_br Next card? Traveling to Europe, planning for next opportunity
Just put ~600k points to a Europe trip (flights) for the family this fall. Next few months will have a good bit of travel prep expenses and booking hotels, trains, rental car (maybe). Looking to figure out what card(s) to get next. Points so far have been mostly on cards to my name, so my partner would be an option if we want to grab bonuses on cards I already have. They also have a business TIN, so that opens an option, no biz cards yet.
Trying to formulate a strategy to maximize points over the next 12-18 months. Ambitious goal is 1M points. With our expenses, $4k in a month is usually trivial. I’ve eyed some of the bonuses on biz cards that need $20k in 3 months … we can usually do that at the beginning of the year, because we burn $3-6k in medical expenses to hit our HDHP deductibles (one of the kids has a very expensive medication). Otherwise it’s hit or miss, depending on various factors.
Ok, enough context. Here’s what I have currently: * Blue Cash Everyday AMEX 6yrs * Plat AMEX 4yrs 10mos * Gold AMEX 7mos
I’m good with canceling anything that makes sense, too. I’m especially not sure if it makes sense to keep the AMEX plat at this point, need to decide in the next month or so. Advice welcome.
Edit: score FICO: 823, TransUnion: 793, Equifax: 806
Edit 2: * oldest card: 27yrs * limits are generally 15-30k per card * past 6 mos: 1 card (Chase Aeroplan) * past 12 mos: 3 cards (Chase Saphhire Preferred, AMEX Gold, Chase Aeroplan) * past 24 mos: 4 cards * category specific cards? sure, mostly out for bonuses * rotating category cards? sure, use MaxRewards app already * monthly spend is gonna favor groceries (family with older teens), Target, Amazon; no rent, minimal travel, minimal gas (WFH); will be in Europe for 2.5wks * Current member of Amazon Prime?: yes * Currently paying $13.99/month or more for Disney Bundle (Disney+ / Hulu / EPSN+) or other Hulu services? yes, using AMEX Plat entertainment credit * Current member of Chase, US Bank or any other big bank?: Have Chase cards, but that’s all * Are you open to Business Cards?: yes
submitted by jobe_br to CreditCards [link] [comments]
Trying to formulate a strategy to maximize points over the next 12-18 months. Ambitious goal is 1M points. With our expenses, $4k in a month is usually trivial. I’ve eyed some of the bonuses on biz cards that need $20k in 3 months … we can usually do that at the beginning of the year, because we burn $3-6k in medical expenses to hit our HDHP deductibles (one of the kids has a very expensive medication). Otherwise it’s hit or miss, depending on various factors.
Ok, enough context. Here’s what I have currently: * Blue Cash Everyday AMEX 6yrs * Plat AMEX 4yrs 10mos * Gold AMEX 7mos
- Chase Amazon Prime 8yrs
- Chase Sapphire Preferred 11mos
- Chase Aeroplan 4mos
- Capital One Venture 2yrs 11mos
I’m good with canceling anything that makes sense, too. I’m especially not sure if it makes sense to keep the AMEX plat at this point, need to decide in the next month or so. Advice welcome.
Edit: score FICO: 823, TransUnion: 793, Equifax: 806
Edit 2: * oldest card: 27yrs * limits are generally 15-30k per card * past 6 mos: 1 card (Chase Aeroplan) * past 12 mos: 3 cards (Chase Saphhire Preferred, AMEX Gold, Chase Aeroplan) * past 24 mos: 4 cards * category specific cards? sure, mostly out for bonuses * rotating category cards? sure, use MaxRewards app already * monthly spend is gonna favor groceries (family with older teens), Target, Amazon; no rent, minimal travel, minimal gas (WFH); will be in Europe for 2.5wks * Current member of Amazon Prime?: yes * Currently paying $13.99/month or more for Disney Bundle (Disney+ / Hulu / EPSN+) or other Hulu services? yes, using AMEX Plat entertainment credit * Current member of Chase, US Bank or any other big bank?: Have Chase cards, but that’s all * Are you open to Business Cards?: yes
2024.05.20 01:50 Soninetz Unbounce vs Webflow: A Detailed Comparison, Which wins?
| | Considering Unbounce vs. Webflow for your website needs? These two platforms offer distinct features catering to different user preferences. Unbounce focuses on creating high-converting landing pages with ease and lead generation, while Webflow provides a comprehensive design and development tool for building custom websites from scratch. Understanding the comparison between Unbounce's simplicity in landing page creation and Webflow's robust web design capabilities, as well as their intuitive interface, can help you choose the best fit for your project. Dive into this comparison to uncover which platform aligns better with your website goals and design preferences. submitted by Soninetz to AllPromos [link] [comments] Useful Links: Key Takeaways
Overview of PlatformsCore FocusUnbounce primarily focuses on landing pages, offering a user-friendly platform for creating high-converting pages without the need for coding skills, catering to users and website design. On the other hand, Webflow is more versatile, serving as a comprehensive website design and development tool with various use cases for businesses and users.Target AudienceUnbounce caters to marketers and small businesses looking to optimize their conversion rates through effective landing pages. In contrast, Webflow appeals to users, designers, and developers seeking full control over the design and functionality of their websites.https://preview.redd.it/rzvvm5yf0h1d1.png?width=800&format=png&auto=webp&s=5f3832be3763e273a3e87c648acc1050df828ae5 Elevate your conversion game 🚀 Kickstart with Unbounce's Free Trial! 📊 Tools and FeaturesUnbounce provides a range of templates, A/B testing tools, and integrations with marketing platforms to enhance lead generation. Meanwhile, Webflow stands out with its robust CMS capabilities, allowing users to build dynamic websites with content management features.
Interface and Ease of UseUnbounceUnbounce offers an intuitive interface that simplifies the website creation process. With its drag-and-drop functionality, users can easily design interactive websites without needing coding skills. The platform's focus on users' experience ensures a smooth workflow for creating landing pages.WebflowWebflow provides a more complex design environment compared to Unbounce. While it offers powerful design capabilities and flexibility, it requires a steeper learning curve due to its advanced features and functionalities. Users looking for more functionality and customization options might prefer Webflow for their projects.Learning CurveUnbounce is known for its simplicity, making it ideal for users who prioritize ease of use and quick setup. In contrast, Webflow caters to users who require more control over their designs but are willing to invest time in mastering the platform's features. The choice between Unbounce and Webflow often comes down to the user's preference for a straightforward interface versus a more intricate design tool.Content Management CapabilitiesLanding Pages EmphasisUnbounce primarily focuses on landing pages, offering a simple yet effective platform for creating conversion-driven websites. Its page builder and editor streamline the process of landing page creation, ideal for marketers and small businesses.On the other hand, Webflow stands out with its comprehensive content management system (CMS) capabilities. It goes beyond just landing pages, allowing users to create dynamic content and manage comprehensive website design effectively. Website Management ScopeWhile Unbounce excels at creating high-converting landing pages, its limited CMS capabilities restrict users in terms of managing broader website content. In contrast, Webflow's robust CMS system enables users to handle various aspects of web design, from SEO optimization features to hosting and page templates.Useful Links: SEO Optimization and CustomizationWith Unbounce, users might find themselves constrained when it comes to implementing advanced SEO strategies or customizing beyond landing pages. In comparison, Webflow provides extensive tools for SEO optimization, empowering web designers to enhance their websites' visibility and user experience effectively.Pricing ComparisonUnbounce PricingUnbounce offers various pricing plans based on the number of landing pages and monthly conversions. Users can opt for plans starting from $80 per month for up to 500 conversions and 20 landing pages. The higher-tier plans, such as the Premium plan at $200 per month, cater to more extensive needs with unlimited landing pages and up to 30,000 conversions.Webflow PricingWebflow's pricing model is structured around features, traffic volume, and hosting requirements. Their basic plan starts at $12 per month, providing essential features for small-scale websites. As the complexity and traffic volume increase, users can choose the CMS plan at $16 per month or the Business plan at $36 per month, offering advanced functionalities like site search and form submissions.Comparing Pricing StrategiesWhen comparing Unbounce and Webflow's pricing strategies, Unbounce focuses more on conversion optimization by tailoring plans according to landing pages and conversions. On the other hand, Webflow emphasizes flexibility by offering different plans catering to varying website complexities and traffic volumes. While Unbounce provides a free trial to test their services, Webflow stands out with its ability to code websites directly within the platform.Tools and ResourcesOptimization ToolsUnbounce offers essential optimization tools like A/B testing and pop-ups, enabling businesses to enhance their marketing strategies effectively. These features help in analyzing the performance of campaigns and improving conversion rates.Wide RangeWebflow boasts a diverse array of tools ranging from forms to e-commerce functionalities and animations. This platform caters to various needs, making it a versatile choice for businesses looking to create visually appealing websites with seamless functionality.Unique OfferingsUnbounce stands out with its unique resources such as customizable templates and user-friendly interface, simplifying the process of creating landing pages. This makes it an ideal choice for startups and small businesses with specific development requirements.Webflow, on the other hand, provides developers with advanced management features and extensive support for building complex websites. Its range of services caters to both beginners and experienced developers, offering flexibility in website creation. Closing ThoughtsAfter comparing Unbounce and Webflow across various aspects, you now have a clearer picture of their strengths and weaknesses. Unbounce shines with its user-friendly interface and robust landing page capabilities, making it a top choice for marketers looking to optimize conversions quickly. On the other hand, Webflow's design flexibility and extensive customization options cater more to web designers seeking creative freedom in building websites.As you weigh your options between Unbounce and Webflow, consider your specific needs and priorities. Whether you prioritize ease of use and conversion-focused features or value design control and customization, both platforms offer unique benefits. Take the time to assess which platform aligns best with your goals and resources to make an informed decision that will propel your online presence forward. Step into boundless marketing success 🌟 Start your Unbounce Free Trial now! 🎉 Frequently Asked QuestionsIs Unbounce or Webflow easier to use for beginners?Unbounce offers a more straightforward interface tailored for marketers and designers with drag-and-drop functionality. Webflow, while powerful, has a steeper learning curve due to its advanced design capabilities and customization options.Which platform is better for managing content efficiently?Webflow provides robust content management capabilities with a visual editor and CMS features suitable for complex websites. Unbounce, on the other hand, focuses more on landing page creation and optimization rather than extensive content management.How do Unbounce and Webflow compare in terms of pricing?Unbounce offers tiered pricing based on traffic limits and features, starting at $80/month. Webflow's pricing is based on site plans, starting at $12/month for basic hosting but can increase significantly based on additional features and services.What tools and resources are available for users of Unbounce and Webflow?Unbounce provides A/B testing tools, conversion optimization resources, and integrations with various marketing platforms. Webflow offers a visual website builder, e-commerce tools, hosting services, and a community forum for support and learning resources.Useful Links: |
2024.05.20 01:49 Winter-Gas3368 USA Military Capabilities 🇺🇲
*United States of America 🇺🇸
United States Armed Forces SMR Grade AZ+ Ground Force Rank 4th Navy Rank 3rd Air Force Rank 1st
Land Force
Tanks 2,799x (6,121) AFVs 15,544x (11,556) Vehicles 185,941x (114,300) Artillery Guns 8,445x (2,432) Rocket Artillery 2,125x (990) Air Defense Systems 1,423x (1,911) Anti Aircraft Guns 43x (480) Specialist Vehicles 6,998x (1,094) Engineering Vehicles 3,436x Electronic Warfare Systems 4,093x (564) Drones 357x Handheld Launchers 2,215,000x (325,000)
Land Force details
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gdak1cMd-NRaBlrBWY7TbbgfHKi54Dl4T0AMwA-ub5E/edit?usp=drivesdk
Navy
Aircraft Carriers 24x (8) Amphibious Ships 202x (8) Battleships (9) Battlecruisers (1) Cruisers 3x (3) Destroyers 99x (1) Frigates 44x (23) Corvettes 26x (3) Fast Attack Craft 76x (4) Mine Ships 8x Electronic Warfare Ships 11x Conventional Submarines (34) Nuclear Submarines 72x (31) Support Ships 4,421x
Navy details
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1prbzvKQ1KDhC0YCJ_P1_5hNIWoOAE4HkFCPx-wHM8jM/edit?usp=drivesdk
Air Force
Fighters 4,019 (1,348) Special Type Aircraft 1,909 (874) Bombers 134 (206) Logistical Aircraft 7,151 (1,133) Attack Helicopters 1,432 (386) Drones 1,639 (170) Small Drones 31,440
Air Force Details
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LWfekcZKfs_p3bCnxMyNW_BBzWl8BjEmchCuaOhIHOM/edit?usp=drivesdk
Combat Manpower
Total Combat Ready 1,832,000 Active Service 2,835,501 Deployed 171,736 Reserve 799,500 Police Officers 708,001
Economic Capital
Gross Domestic Product
GDP Nominal £26,854,000,000,000 GDP PPP $26,854,000,000,000 GDP Per Capita Nominal $80,034 GDP Per Capita PPP $80,034 GDP Growth up 2.1% CPI Inflation 3%
Credit and Debt
Credit Rating AA+ A AA+ A Negative Current Account -$985,250,000,000 Gross External Debt $27,000,000,000,000 Government Debt $30,568,951,000,000 Foreign Investment $8,084,000,000,000 Market Cap $46,200,000,000,000
Spending and Trade
Military Exports $129,315,902,129 Gold Reserves 8,133t $528,157,020,000 Defence Spending $886,300,000,000 Foreign Reserves $217,300,000,000 Tax Revenue $8,580,000,000,000 Tax Expense $9,820,000,000,000 Deficit -$1,240,000,000,000
Logistics
Domestic Geography
Landmass 9,826,675km² Roadways 6,586,610km Railways 293,564km High Speed Railway 935km Waterways 41,009km
Statistics
Total Population 340,332,281 Labour Force 161,200,000 Cargo Aircraft 5,791 Civilian Ships ~5,500 Civilian Cars ~290,800,000 Civilian Trucks ~168,600,000 Civilian Busses ~939,200 Civilian Trains 28,674 Civilian Aircraft 204,405 Construction Workers 10,755,099 Aircraft Technicians 312,890 Engineers 931,640 Shipyard Builders 105,652 Scientists ~9,000,000 Mechanics 768,917 Landing Craft 130 Logistics Vessels 2,123 10.8m Brls. 6.4m tn Patrol Vessels 1,807 Military Trucks 153,420 Military Logistical Aircraft 7,151
Domestic Hubs
Minor Ports 360 Major Ports 35 Airports 10,211 Helipads 6,104 Bus Depots 10,314 Train Stations 39,568 Police Stations 3,110 Auto shops 286,016 Gas Stations 127,588 Warehouses ~21,000 Small Dry Docks 188 Large Dry Docks 24 Military Bases 178 Air & Space Force Bases 77 Naval Bases 27 Radar Installations 455
Overseas Hubs
Military Bases 520 Naval Bases 8 Air & Space Force Bases 30 Total Satellites 238
Global Production
Shipbuilding 0.21% Aircraft Manufacturing 38.3% manufacturing 16.82% Steel Production 10.1% Aluminium Production 1% Semiconductor Production 6.31% Wheat Production 8.4% Shipping 3.4% Total Services 18.7% Timber Exports 8% Automobile Production 20.1% Oil Production 17.7% Liquid Natural Gas Production 23.8% Coal Production 6%
Military Production
Large Shipyards 22 Small Shipyards 120 Tank Factories 1 Armoured Unit Producers 43 Equipment Producers 98 Munitions Producers 3 Small Arms Producers 591 Ammunition Producers 376 Aircraft Producers 1,408
Estimates per year capacity
Tanks ~100-200 Armoured Vehicles ~150-200 Vehicles 2-3m Shells ~400-900k Bullets ~300-600m Small Arms ~10-16m Fighters ~60-160 4.5 & 5th Gen Planes 200-400 Rotorcraft ~40-200 Fleet Carriers 0.05-0.2 Escort Carriers 0.2-0.4 Large Ships ~0.1-0.3 Small Ships ~2-10 Large Submarines 0.1-0.3 Small Submarines 0.3-0.8
Industry
Major Shipyards 22 Minor Shipyards 120 Automotive Plants 55 Manufacturing Factories 628,334 Aircraft Producers 1,408
Natural Resources
Production
Oil 18,000,000 bbl Liquid Natural Gas 967,144,362,000 Cu.m Coal 495,130,000 mt
Consumption
Oil 20,555,000 bbl -2,555,000 deficit Liquid Natural Gas 857,542,658,000 Cu.m +109,601,704,000 deficit Coal 441,968,000 mt +53,162,000 deficit
Reserves
Oil reserves 50,000,000,000bbl Natural gas reserves 13,178,780,000,000Cu.m Coal reserves 228,662,000,000mt
Energy
Nuclear Power Stations 54 Power Stations 12,538 Power Output 4,230tw/h
Facilities
Offshore Oil Rigs 626 Total Oil Wells 916,934 Oil Refineries 129 LNG Refineries 170 Coal Mines 991
Military Technology
Aircraft
• 5th Gen Fighters • 3rd Gen AEWAC Aircraft • 4th Gen CAS Aircraft • 4th Gen Helicopters • 5th Gen Transports • Ariel Refueling Tankers • ASW planes • Reconnaissance Aircraft • C2 Aircraft • Specialist Planes • Stealth Unmanned Ariel Vehicles • 3rd Gen Electronic Warfare Aircraft • 2nd Gen Stealth Bombers • 3rd Gen Strategic Bombers • 3rd Gen Supersonic Bombers • 4th Gen Helicopter Gunships • 3rd Gen ASW Helicopters
Weapons Systems
• ERBVRAAMs • 4th Gen ATGMs • 4th Gen Missles • 3rd Gen Manpads • 2nd Gen Manpats • 3rd Gen ICBMs • Anti ICBM Systems • ASW Rockets • MIRV Warheads • CIWS • Multi Packed VLS Cells with Guided Missles • Direct Energy Weapons • Homing Mines • Active Sonar & Wake Seeking Torpedoes • Loitering Munition Drones • Anti Radiation Missles
Various Military Technology
• 3rd Gen Reactive Armour • 3rd Gen thermal imagers • Programmable Ammunition • Caseless Ammunition • Global Navigation System • ECM systems • AESA Radars • Hard & Soft Kill APS • Stealth Technology
Vehicles • 5th Gen IFVs • 3.5 Gen Tanks • 4th Generation Radar Systems • 3rd Gen Counter Battery Systems • 4th Gen SAM Launchers • 2nd Gen GMLRS • 1st Gen MLRS • 3rd Gen Tank Destroyers • 3rd Gen Cruise Missile Launchers • 5th Gen Towed Artillery • 4th Gen SPAGs • 4th Gen AA Guns • 3rd Gen SPAAGs • C4 Vehicles • 3rd Gen EW Vehicles
Naval Vessels
• Stealth Ships • Nuclear Powered Ships • Fleet Carriers • MCV Ships • Amphibious Command Ships • Guided Missle Submarines • Fast Combat Support Ships • Tracking Ships
submitted by Winter-Gas3368 to u/Winter-Gas3368 [link] [comments]
United States Armed Forces SMR Grade AZ+ Ground Force Rank 4th Navy Rank 3rd Air Force Rank 1st
Land Force
Tanks 2,799x (6,121) AFVs 15,544x (11,556) Vehicles 185,941x (114,300) Artillery Guns 8,445x (2,432) Rocket Artillery 2,125x (990) Air Defense Systems 1,423x (1,911) Anti Aircraft Guns 43x (480) Specialist Vehicles 6,998x (1,094) Engineering Vehicles 3,436x Electronic Warfare Systems 4,093x (564) Drones 357x Handheld Launchers 2,215,000x (325,000)
Land Force details
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gdak1cMd-NRaBlrBWY7TbbgfHKi54Dl4T0AMwA-ub5E/edit?usp=drivesdk
Navy
Aircraft Carriers 24x (8) Amphibious Ships 202x (8) Battleships (9) Battlecruisers (1) Cruisers 3x (3) Destroyers 99x (1) Frigates 44x (23) Corvettes 26x (3) Fast Attack Craft 76x (4) Mine Ships 8x Electronic Warfare Ships 11x Conventional Submarines (34) Nuclear Submarines 72x (31) Support Ships 4,421x
Navy details
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1prbzvKQ1KDhC0YCJ_P1_5hNIWoOAE4HkFCPx-wHM8jM/edit?usp=drivesdk
Air Force
Fighters 4,019 (1,348) Special Type Aircraft 1,909 (874) Bombers 134 (206) Logistical Aircraft 7,151 (1,133) Attack Helicopters 1,432 (386) Drones 1,639 (170) Small Drones 31,440
Air Force Details
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LWfekcZKfs_p3bCnxMyNW_BBzWl8BjEmchCuaOhIHOM/edit?usp=drivesdk
Combat Manpower
Total Combat Ready 1,832,000 Active Service 2,835,501 Deployed 171,736 Reserve 799,500 Police Officers 708,001
Economic Capital
Gross Domestic Product
GDP Nominal £26,854,000,000,000 GDP PPP $26,854,000,000,000 GDP Per Capita Nominal $80,034 GDP Per Capita PPP $80,034 GDP Growth up 2.1% CPI Inflation 3%
Credit and Debt
Credit Rating AA+ A AA+ A Negative Current Account -$985,250,000,000 Gross External Debt $27,000,000,000,000 Government Debt $30,568,951,000,000 Foreign Investment $8,084,000,000,000 Market Cap $46,200,000,000,000
Spending and Trade
Military Exports $129,315,902,129 Gold Reserves 8,133t $528,157,020,000 Defence Spending $886,300,000,000 Foreign Reserves $217,300,000,000 Tax Revenue $8,580,000,000,000 Tax Expense $9,820,000,000,000 Deficit -$1,240,000,000,000
Logistics
Domestic Geography
Landmass 9,826,675km² Roadways 6,586,610km Railways 293,564km High Speed Railway 935km Waterways 41,009km
Statistics
Total Population 340,332,281 Labour Force 161,200,000 Cargo Aircraft 5,791 Civilian Ships ~5,500 Civilian Cars ~290,800,000 Civilian Trucks ~168,600,000 Civilian Busses ~939,200 Civilian Trains 28,674 Civilian Aircraft 204,405 Construction Workers 10,755,099 Aircraft Technicians 312,890 Engineers 931,640 Shipyard Builders 105,652 Scientists ~9,000,000 Mechanics 768,917 Landing Craft 130 Logistics Vessels 2,123 10.8m Brls. 6.4m tn Patrol Vessels 1,807 Military Trucks 153,420 Military Logistical Aircraft 7,151
Domestic Hubs
Minor Ports 360 Major Ports 35 Airports 10,211 Helipads 6,104 Bus Depots 10,314 Train Stations 39,568 Police Stations 3,110 Auto shops 286,016 Gas Stations 127,588 Warehouses ~21,000 Small Dry Docks 188 Large Dry Docks 24 Military Bases 178 Air & Space Force Bases 77 Naval Bases 27 Radar Installations 455
Overseas Hubs
Military Bases 520 Naval Bases 8 Air & Space Force Bases 30 Total Satellites 238
- Military Satellites 170
- Space Force Satellites 30
- GPS Global Navigation Satellites 38
Global Production
Shipbuilding 0.21% Aircraft Manufacturing 38.3% manufacturing 16.82% Steel Production 10.1% Aluminium Production 1% Semiconductor Production 6.31% Wheat Production 8.4% Shipping 3.4% Total Services 18.7% Timber Exports 8% Automobile Production 20.1% Oil Production 17.7% Liquid Natural Gas Production 23.8% Coal Production 6%
Military Production
Large Shipyards 22 Small Shipyards 120 Tank Factories 1 Armoured Unit Producers 43 Equipment Producers 98 Munitions Producers 3 Small Arms Producers 591 Ammunition Producers 376 Aircraft Producers 1,408
Estimates per year capacity
Tanks ~100-200 Armoured Vehicles ~150-200 Vehicles 2-3m Shells ~400-900k Bullets ~300-600m Small Arms ~10-16m Fighters ~60-160 4.5 & 5th Gen Planes 200-400 Rotorcraft ~40-200 Fleet Carriers 0.05-0.2 Escort Carriers 0.2-0.4 Large Ships ~0.1-0.3 Small Ships ~2-10 Large Submarines 0.1-0.3 Small Submarines 0.3-0.8
Industry
Major Shipyards 22 Minor Shipyards 120 Automotive Plants 55 Manufacturing Factories 628,334 Aircraft Producers 1,408
Natural Resources
Production
Oil 18,000,000 bbl Liquid Natural Gas 967,144,362,000 Cu.m Coal 495,130,000 mt
Consumption
Oil 20,555,000 bbl -2,555,000 deficit Liquid Natural Gas 857,542,658,000 Cu.m +109,601,704,000 deficit Coal 441,968,000 mt +53,162,000 deficit
Reserves
Oil reserves 50,000,000,000bbl Natural gas reserves 13,178,780,000,000Cu.m Coal reserves 228,662,000,000mt
Energy
Nuclear Power Stations 54 Power Stations 12,538 Power Output 4,230tw/h
Facilities
Offshore Oil Rigs 626 Total Oil Wells 916,934 Oil Refineries 129 LNG Refineries 170 Coal Mines 991
Military Technology
Aircraft
• 5th Gen Fighters • 3rd Gen AEWAC Aircraft • 4th Gen CAS Aircraft • 4th Gen Helicopters • 5th Gen Transports • Ariel Refueling Tankers • ASW planes • Reconnaissance Aircraft • C2 Aircraft • Specialist Planes • Stealth Unmanned Ariel Vehicles • 3rd Gen Electronic Warfare Aircraft • 2nd Gen Stealth Bombers • 3rd Gen Strategic Bombers • 3rd Gen Supersonic Bombers • 4th Gen Helicopter Gunships • 3rd Gen ASW Helicopters
Weapons Systems
• ERBVRAAMs • 4th Gen ATGMs • 4th Gen Missles • 3rd Gen Manpads • 2nd Gen Manpats • 3rd Gen ICBMs • Anti ICBM Systems • ASW Rockets • MIRV Warheads • CIWS • Multi Packed VLS Cells with Guided Missles • Direct Energy Weapons • Homing Mines • Active Sonar & Wake Seeking Torpedoes • Loitering Munition Drones • Anti Radiation Missles
Various Military Technology
• 3rd Gen Reactive Armour • 3rd Gen thermal imagers • Programmable Ammunition • Caseless Ammunition • Global Navigation System • ECM systems • AESA Radars • Hard & Soft Kill APS • Stealth Technology
Vehicles • 5th Gen IFVs • 3.5 Gen Tanks • 4th Generation Radar Systems • 3rd Gen Counter Battery Systems • 4th Gen SAM Launchers • 2nd Gen GMLRS • 1st Gen MLRS • 3rd Gen Tank Destroyers • 3rd Gen Cruise Missile Launchers • 5th Gen Towed Artillery • 4th Gen SPAGs • 4th Gen AA Guns • 3rd Gen SPAAGs • C4 Vehicles • 3rd Gen EW Vehicles
Naval Vessels
• Stealth Ships • Nuclear Powered Ships • Fleet Carriers • MCV Ships • Amphibious Command Ships • Guided Missle Submarines • Fast Combat Support Ships • Tracking Ships
2024.05.20 01:33 QueenDollydo Is this for ever purchase?
 | So pissed they removed the ability to use play points.... So is this really for every purchase or just 5.99$ off one purchase once a month? submitted by QueenDollydo to CODM [link] [comments] |
2024.05.20 01:32 BigBoss-2006 How to fix mesh inside of a mesh causing glitches? The shirts inside the overalls aren't touching
submitted by BigBoss-2006 to blenderhelp [link] [comments]
2024.05.20 01:31 Abject_Trick8717 Brisbane Buff?
Whilst I know this isn't the metric WG use to decide balance changes, I think comparison to similar ships makes the most sense to me. In the case of Brisbane I just see no reason to use her over Mino or Worcester.
In the case of Mino the addition of HE just doesn't seem enough to warrant the huge reload nerf. Yes you gain 0.1km to the radar and two torpedos per side but you lose access to a smoke screen, short fuse AP and have worse detectability. Minos torpedo armament is devastating enough.
When compared to Worcester, you trade significantly better armour (32mm bow and stern, 26mm side plating) for torpedos when you choose to play Brisbane.
What stat do you think Brisbane needs buffed to give her her own niche at legendary tier? I think a MBRB could be an idea. Or is she in a good place right now and am I missing a key attribute or way to play her?
Edit: Worcesters armour
submitted by Abject_Trick8717 to WoWs_Legends [link] [comments]
In the case of Mino the addition of HE just doesn't seem enough to warrant the huge reload nerf. Yes you gain 0.1km to the radar and two torpedos per side but you lose access to a smoke screen, short fuse AP and have worse detectability. Minos torpedo armament is devastating enough.
When compared to Worcester, you trade significantly better armour (32mm bow and stern, 26mm side plating) for torpedos when you choose to play Brisbane.
What stat do you think Brisbane needs buffed to give her her own niche at legendary tier? I think a MBRB could be an idea. Or is she in a good place right now and am I missing a key attribute or way to play her?
Edit: Worcesters armour