John candy saying

The John Candy Award for Achievement in Cardiovascular Health

2022.02.04 15:25 trailerparkmalarkey The John Candy Award for Achievement in Cardiovascular Health

[link]


2009.02.16 03:30 O Canada

Where John Candy was from.
[link]


2014.02.12 21:58 greatgerm John Candy GIFs (And HTML5 videos)

Now serving all your John Candy GIFs and HTML5 video needs. http://www.reddit.com/funny/comments/1xpoez/this_happened_before_the_first_flake/cfdlc0o
[link]


2024.05.19 19:17 Potential_Quality504 What if Kitae Hong(Jay’s bro) is KOB

What if Kitae Hong(Jay’s bro) is KOB submitted by Potential_Quality504 to lookismcomic [link] [comments]


2024.05.19 19:15 Emaw859 Day 3 thoughts

I was not a big user but was consistent over the last 4 years, Zyn was an easy cope need for me. I’ve tried to quiet multiple times but have caved in the past. Had someone at work say they were quitting (bigger user than myself) and it inspired me to kick it back into gear again and quitting cold turkey
Some of my symptoms I believe are tied to Zyn usage: - Sweating easily and more often (especially form my armpits) - tightness in my chest when working out recently - went though some major life changes recently (new job, new baby) and found my anxiety out the roof, had a few breakdowns I have never had before (obviously this is not all nicotine related but I don’t believe it helped my anxiety) - waking up with extreme cotton mouth in the AMs - overly active bowels, was using the restroom 3-4x per day
Things I am doing to help myself through quitting (cold turkey) - bought some sugar free hard candies to suck on and bought some Teaza pouches (they are ok but help with the fixation need) - I have been more active, trying to workout or even just go walk more along with staying busier socially - drinking lots of water, staying hydrated
Trying to stay strong here, let me know any tips or if you had similar symptoms. Appreciate the support of this sub
submitted by Emaw859 to QuittingZyn [link] [comments]


2024.05.19 19:12 addctd2prtty Teacher Appreciation Gift

Hi everyone,
I’m a parent of two toddlers. At their daycare, it’s teacher appreciation month. In total, there will be 9 people I will be getting gifts for. I’m planning to get gift cards, but I’m usually more thoughtful than a gift card.
What gifts do teachers typically like?
I’m avoiding the stuff that says “teacher” (initially what I was going to do), cups (no one wants that lol), and food/candy. I was thinking about getting everyone custom name keychains in their favorite color.
Making a gift is out of the question since it’s so many people.
My daughter’s class has two teachers and my son’s class has four teachers. The other people work in the front but they do help in the classroom.
submitted by addctd2prtty to Teachers [link] [comments]


2024.05.19 19:02 villainouscinema The Last Voyage of the Demeter (2023) via Villainous Cinema

a review by Evan Landon
I remember distinctly the first time I saw the trailer for Last Voyage of the Demeter and just shaking my head as they butchered Bullet With Butterfly Wings with some stupid techno downbeat. Why do they do that shit? They take a song that everybody knows, then shoehorn that shit in so hard that it's comical. “The world is a vampire” with a bunch of reverb and synth drums while a monster stalks his prey is so corny and lazy that I want to punch a kitten. “Oh, it's a movie about vampires? Ohhhh let's put that one Smashing Pumpkins song in it and make it suck.” Talentless, generic hacks are behind that brilliance on every level, I'm telling you. After seeing the 1931 Tod Browning movie as a kid, I immediately wanted to read the 1897 Bram Stoker novel from where it originated, and I have to say that it was not the kind of read I was expecting. The entire novel is told through letters, journals, and newspaper articles which is not the kind of thing one would expect when it comes to one of the first horror stories, but that also was what gave it its appeal, I think. It was different... Just because something is different does not make it good; however, this one was good enough to be adapted into a stage play in 1924 by Hamilton Dean & John L. Balderston. Hey, that was 100 years ago! I bring the whole Dracula origin because that is the part in the novel (Chapter 7, to be exact) where it is told through the Captain's Log which I found the most tedious and somewhat boring. When they said that they were doing a film based on that, I was very quick to dismiss it when it finally arrived, but watching it gave me a different feeling altogether. Was it a good feeling? Meh. What I did enjoy about this movie was how they were able to somewhat build a narrative out of a nothing burger in the novel. The gore is adequate for CGI, so I don't worry too much about that because there are some okay close-ups that make up for it practically. The acting is on point too with Liam Cunningham as The Captain, David Dastmalchian as his first mate, and Corey Hawkins as the ship's doctor. The only problem I have with having a black doctor on the boat in the 19th century is that there were not a lot of black doctors (Cambridge alumni or not) around at that time, so it's shoved in there pretty hard with no real reason. They acknowledge it, but that does not change the conveniency of the writing. Then there is the Transylvanian woman who was placed on the boat for Dracula to snack on, so those boxes got ticked for the suits because everyone needs to have representation in every movie nowadays. What did not work was mostly the lack of gore or “Dracula” himself. We are used to seeing ol' Drac as a beguiling count who borders on romantic, then crosses that border. Also, the fog and mist coalescing with the lack of lighting and flowing motions of the camera makes this difficult to see, much less watch. Although the acting is great, the characters and dialogue between are not interesting enough to truly value and what would stand as a story is very flimsy; but again, there was not much to work with in one chapter of a novel that is basically just a captain's log. When you have tentpoles so weak to build upon, I guess what you want is something outrageous to gain some weight. What is the story, you ask? A 19th Century English supply ship named the “Demeter” is coming from Romania to Britain and its contents happen to contain a monster that feasts on human blood. Chaos ensues, as the crew not only try to make it to shore, but also to save their lives. Maybe even their souls! The Last Voyage of the Demeter is an interesting look at the most overlooked part of the source material, but nobody really has any original ideas anymore, so might as well. Released by DreamWorks Pictures, it pulled in $21.8 million against a $45 million budget, so I would not expect to see a sequel that was teased at the end. This is the end, for this movie, anyways. With all the other “Dracula” movies out there, I'd say go with one of those instead if you are looking for the classic Dracula character. It's literally just a giant CGI man-bat version of it, which works and doesn't at the same time. 
2.5 out of 5
submitted by villainouscinema to moviereviews [link] [comments]


2024.05.19 19:02 MattanaMinistry Mattana Ministry - Sunday Sermon - 19 May 2024

Mattana Ministry Welcomes You To: Sunday Sermon: 19 May 2024 Theme: The Working of the Holy Spirit Music: https://youtu.be/XqbYo4_DeGI https://youtu.be/d-SI_HRWooA Scripture: 1 Cor. 12:3; John.4:24; John.6:63; Mark.16:15; John.14:26; Acts.1:8 & Mark.3:28-30 Message: We celebrate the outpouring of the Holy Spirit today, but what is the work of the Holy Spirit in our lives? Who and What is the Holy Spirit, and why do we need the Holy Spirit in our lives? Let's first see who and what is the Holy Spirit and then we look at how the Holy Spirit works in our lives. The Holy Spirit is the third Person of the Divine Trinity and is called the Spirit of Truth. The Holy Spirit is the eternal Power and Power of God as we can see in 1 Cor. 12:3 and John.4:24: 1 Cor. 12:3 Wherefore I give you to understand, that no man speaking by the Spirit of God calleth Jesus accursed: and that no man can say that Jesus is the Lord, but by the Holy Ghost. John.4:24 God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth. We see here that we need the Holy Spirit in order to worship and understand God. Now let's look at how the Holy Spirit works in our lives. The Holy Spirit brings us to life, as seen in John. 6:63 John. 6:63 It is the spirit that quickenth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they life. The Holy Spirit quickens. When the Holy Spirit is in our lives, it's like a fire being kindled. The more we hear the Word and the more we believe the Word the more the fire burns within us. The Word we have received from Jesus is spirit and life. The Holy Spirit makes us capable, let's look at Mark. 16:15 Mark.16:15 And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature. Without the Holy Spirit in our lives, we will not have the courage and ability to preach the Gospel and win souls for the Kingdom. We will shy away from the command Jesus gave us because we will feel that we are not qualified to tell people about Jesus. The Holy Spirit is there for our comfort and power, let's look at John.14:26 & Acts 1:8 John.14:26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you. Acts1:8 But ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth. When we are alone, the Holy Spirit will be there for us. The Holy Spirit will comfort us when we are hurting and unhappy. The Holy Spirit will give us the strength we need to meet life's challenges. Is the Holy Spirit just a children's story? No, the Holy Spirit is a serious Person and we are also exhorted not to sin against the Holy Spirit as we can see in Mark 3:28-30 Mark.3:28-30 Verily I say unto you, All sins shall be forgiven unto the sons of men, and blasphemies wherewith soever they shall blaspheme: But he that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost hath never forgiveness, but is in danger of eternal damnation. Because they said, He hath an unclean spirit. Do we need the Holy Spirit in our lives? Ensure. Is the Holy Spirit important in our daily existence? Yes, definitely. Prayer: Dear Father we come to You at the end of the week, and thank You for sending us the Holy Spirit. Lord thank you that we have the Holy Spirit to guide and teach us in Your Word. Holy Spirit please work in our lives every day, please be a part of our daily existence and please be the Voice that admonishes us when we act incorrectly. In Jesus Name, Amen Please feel free to leave a review of this message. https://www.soulcenters.org/directory/mattana-ministry/#listing-reviews MM
submitted by MattanaMinistry to Christianity [link] [comments]


2024.05.19 18:54 L0rem-Ipsum-Docet Charlie carries a part of Charlotte’s Soul

Charlie carries a part of Charlotte’s Soul
Because people don't make enough theories about novels, here's a short theory about them.
As we learn at the end of TFC, Charlie does not have a soul of human origin since she is an agony creature/an object infected by agony (I know it’s debatable, but it doesn’t really matter for this theory). Her memories therefore come from after the creation of her main bodies (after 1983) as well as from fictitious scenes staged by Henry to make his daughter believe that she had a life during the period of the creation of her body. As clarified by Elizabeth, before Charlie had a body, her memories were either those of Henry or memories made by Henry.
Basically, she has three types of memories:
  1. Charliebot's direct memories (for example, the events of TSE or her memories of childhood spent with her friends), the equivalent of our human memories. We know that Henry has access to these memories and can suppress or modify any memories he wants.
  2. Memories made by Henry, who used camera recordings that he filmed himself (for example, some of her memories spent in her father's workshop).
  3. Memories from Henry himself that Charlie absorbed as any agony entity would (for example, Henry crying with his daughter on the hill or Henry discussing with Jen about Charlotte’s ghost).
So far so good, it's logical, and all of the memories from this time could have been created by Henry without too many problems (since they are mainly memories of Henry working in his workshop alongside his daughter).
These fabricated memories therefore certainly date from the year 1983, or even 1982. We know that Charlotte was reported missing in October 1982 (or it was retconned in 1983, whatever) and that she was buried in 1983, which leads us to believe that Henry began his experiments around this period. In addition, Charlie mentions knowing her friends quite well when she was a child and was around them for at least two years (she mentions in TSE a passage of time of two years between the first and the last time she invited John to her house), meaning that they spent a few years together. So the period where Henry must have falsely manifested the presence of his daughter must not have lasted many years either, therefore easily explaining how he was able to stage everything without much difficulty for Charlie's memories after 1982 and before she got a body (it was only a matter of a few months).
This is all well and good, but what about memories from before Charlotte’s death?
At first, we can say that they should not be very complicated to reproduce either and that they are staged by Henry. They are mostly childhood memories, after all—basic memories from early childhood. But it raises some inconsistencies. Certainly, Henry could have recreated memories where he and his daughter talk at the Fredbear despite the place having fallen into ruin, but recreate a memory where his entire family is present? It gets harder... This is definitely not the second category. So these are probably memories belonging directly to Henry, right? And yes, it already works better. Charlie could just remember family moments and father-daughter moments via Henry's own memory by having his own feelings superimposed on hers. Except... what about the scenes where Henry is not present? The scenes that only take place between Sammy and Charlie or between Charlie and her mother (well, I have to admit, it’s not like there were a lot of scenes between Charlie and “her” mom—there’s only one for them in the entire trilogy), and where Henry is undeniably absent? What do we do with them?
And then, it must be said that the fact that Charlie so easily differentiates her feelings and those of her father, even when they are quite distinct, is a little strange. Since when do agony entities feel the emotions of a person attached to their victim and not of the person themselves? When Henry puts his rage into the fourth Charliebot, he didn’t put the rage he imagined the robot was feeling; he put his own rage. It's kinda weird. So yes, Charlie was able to reinterpret the memories, but to this extent? I’m not that shocked because… it’s Charlie. She’s already a bit of an exception, and she also seems to already interpret things in her own way, as seen in the memory on the hill and in the memory where Henry is talking to Jen about Ella, but still.
And above all… Charlie remembers her kidnapping. Or rather, the kidnapping of her brother who is in fact her sister (it quickly becomes complicated). It can't be a memory of Henry; he wasn't there. That's clear. We are therefore left with the second solution: Henry recreated this memory by filming the scene. At first, it seemed coherent. Henry just changed the fact that it was Sammy who was kidnapped and not Charlie, which explains this change without creating any inconsistency.
Except, first, that means Henry got up one morning and decided to shoot a film of his daughter's death (aaaand... surprisingly, now that I think about it, it's completely something that Henry could do. Well, I'm still putting it here because it's really twisted). Next, how to shoot this scene without Sammy? Well, fortunately, there is a fairly simple solution for that. Henry has conditioned his daughter to consider that the person she misses and who was kidnapped is her brother. We know that Henry can manipulate his daughter's point of view to a certain extent, and that could quite clearly be what happened in this case. As an adult, Charlie immediately thinks that her instincts to go into her closet and commit suicide are a manifestation of her brother (which is false). Likewise, Henry had no problem making her forget the fact that Sammy moved into the new house with them. So yes, if the scene is actually filmed, a young child would be needed to play the role of Sammy, but Sammy himself is not necessarily required. Which leads us to the question of which kid did Henry take to play in his macabre roleplay where he would have played the role of his daughter's murderer?
Another major problem: Charlie remembers being face-to-face with Spring Bonnie. How could Henry have known that his child was kidnapped by William when the case was never solved (I mean, Sammy could have talked about it, but if that were the case, why is Henry still friends with William if William is the number one suspect?)? And can we talk about the precision of the scene? Charlie's false memories are moments where she does not interact with her surroundings (for relatively obvious reasons such as a camera can’t talk and doesn’t have arms), unlike this memory where Charlie interacts with Sammy.
And then seriously. Why did Henry create such an atrocious scene?
For realism?
No one remembers the conditions of “Sammy’s” death in any case. People don’t even know he’s not dead at Hurricane. Why not pretend that his daughter was not present during the kidnapping or make her believe that she has forgotten this horrible memory?
Because he believes Charlie has the right to witness a realistic version?
First, this is not Henry's mentality at all (he’s the guy who lived in total denial for two years) and then Elizabeth directly says that the false memories serve to maintain the illusion that Charlie is a happy child and absolutely not a paranormal entity traumatized by her father's negligence and the incomprehension of her condition.
“He made memories for you; creating a life for her little rag doll, making her a real little girl. I am sure that many of these memories were carefully crafted and embellished (...)”
—Elizabeth, TFC
I also want to point out that Henry altered Charlie's memories in 1985 (before his suicide) to force her to forget every trace of Afton. We know that’s the case because William had already met Charlie before and probably studied her with Henry, but Charlie doesn’t even remember seeing him before in TSE. Henry is the only character who can manipulate Charlie's memories, so he’s the one who did it, even if his motives aren’t very clear.
Maybe Charlie just imagined the scene herself then?
Yes, but no. Firstly, because she would need to have cosmic gifts to guess that William was disguised as Spring Bonnie, and then because it's not really Charlie's habit to invent memories, even for events of which she is aware and which she could more easily recreate (for example, the separation with her mother, which Charlie finds strange not to remember, but she never reinvented a memory herself).
Just inconsistency and negligence on the part of the authors?
Yes, there is probably that. But now that it's in the final book, we can't just ignore the problem.
And this is where I propose my theory: Charlie's memories from before 1982 do not come from scenes created by Henry, nor even from Henry's memories; they come from Charlotte. I'm not talking about Charlotte's soul itself, I'm talking about agony or rather feelings in our context.
As explained by our friend Phineas in the FF, in the Fnaf universe, objects in our environment can absorb the emotional energies that we, beings of flesh and blood, produce. Phineas mainly focuses on negative emotions and feelings since he considers them to be the most powerful emotions in the world of Fnaf, which I absolutely disagree with, but it has little importance here. The important thing is that we introduce energy into receptacles unintentionally.
“[Human emotions] emanate from us or are excreted from us, if you will, like sweat or tears, and it wafts outward like a noxious cloud, soaking into the surroundings.” —Phineas, Epilogue 1:35AM
However, these feelings are not necessarily negative. They can be positive as it's suggested in the novels when Charlie says she believes in ghosts and Marla adds by talking about her own experiences in certain places which seemed to give off a positive energy. It is even quite logical with the fact that Henry's denial is an emotion powerful enough to feed the entity that is Charlie (even if denial isn't really suffering), and the fact that David seems to be able to put happiness into the Mimic even when he wasn’t aware yet.
So.
Wouldn't it be normal for the very strong feelings that emanate from a young child to be stored in an object that they rarely part with? More precisely, an object that contains very strong feelings to the point that they can be considered a source of energy would have every chance of being a transitional object, an object that toddlers use to develop emotionally and have a first control of their emotions—a cuddly toy.
Do you have any memories from your childhood? Probably. Do you have an object that reminds you of it? It could be anything, a book, a toy, a stuffed animal. You know, that object that appears in old photographs. Personally, I had a rabbit plush that I never let go of. It is an object that accompanied me in my childhood wherever I went, offering me comfort when I needed it, and I spent hours playing with it. Now, let's take a look back at Charlie's memories of her early childhood. These are pleasant moments that can mark a young child, almost exclusively moments of play and rest. Moments spent at Fredbear's, moments in the car... The kind of moments where it would be normal for a young child to have a toy, a plushie... maybe a doll? You understand where I'm going with this.
I mean, it's not like it’s an unknown concept in Fnaf. We can think of Simon, who talks to Jake and is not haunted by a soul, or even Tyler's Tag Along Freddy. And I will pass on the theories which propose a solution based on agony concerning Fredbear Plush in Fnaf 4.
When Elizabeth talks about her life (and death) to Charlie, she talks about her Charlizabeth phase in a very specific way: Charlizabeth's body received emotions but wasn’t able to interpret them before gaining consciousness.
“Of course, I could not comprehend those memories until I had received a soul of my own (...). Once I had endowed myself with a soul, I experienced those memories anew: not as an uncomprehending toy, twitching and seizing with an all-consuming rage I could not fathom, but as a person.” —Elizabeth, TFC
This is where it gets interesting. This is exactly what happens to Charlie regarding her old memories. They are memories that she has reinterpreted. Charlie is not a robot; she is originally a rag doll. And… well, in the end, we don’t know much about this rag doll. Her name is Ella, or Henry renamed her Ella, it's not very clear (not to be confused with the Ella doll, I know it's very confusing, but the doll we're talking about was not built by Henry). It was an object purchased in a shop rather than being made by Henry, and above all, it was a toy that belonged to Charlotte (biological Henry’s daughter, I mean).
Now what's interesting is that Henry cried into this object for days and nights, no doubt because it reminded him of his daughter. Even once the shock stage had passed and the denial stage approached, Henry did not part with the doll and kept it in his workshop on a chair. I would like to point out that this happened when Henry did not believe that his daughter's soul was in the doll but believed that Charlotte's soul was in another doll (the other doll also called Ella but which was created by Henry, the one we see in the novels). So if he keeps the doll displayed like this at home, it is probably because it has a very strong personal connection to Henry, and it was an important toy in the eyes of his daughter.
Let's imagine that this doll was Charlotte's cuddly toy, an object that she regularly kept with her and for which she reserved particular importance. The doll was able to integrate the emotions, feelings, and memories of its owner like any object in the world of Fnaf, without being animated by a conscience—a conscience that would only develop when Henry put all his negative feelings and his love for his deceased daughter into it (feelings obviously much more raw and powerful than the simple emotions of a toddler).
Now, let's go back to the memories in question. Charlie remembers the times spent with family, since she was with her family but in the form of a toy. She remembers the moments between Henry and Charlotte since she was with Charlotte and Charlotte's interpretation of the world was transmitted into her doll. Charlie remembers the play scenes between Charlotte and Sammy since Charlotte was playing with her. Which leads us to the kidnapping scene that Charlie remembers.
As for Elizabeth, the memory is a reinterpretation that Charlie carries out on Charlotte's feelings during her kidnapping. Not everything is real since Charlie was then influenced by her father (just as all of her other memories are biased. Charlie thinks she IS Charlotte the little girl when she was just her doll, a bit like how she identifies herself as Charlie in the memories she inherited from Henry, instead of interpreting them as being Henry himself).
Charlie is traumatized by this event, truly traumatized. Because Henry himself was traumatized by the event or for another reason? What traumatized Charlie the most was the figurative mutilation she suffered when her “brother” was taken from her, but her brother was never taken from her. Could the trauma not come from the brutal separation from her owner? It is also interesting to note that once Charlotte was kidnapped by William, Charlie only remembers the events very very vaguely and only vividly remembers the moment when her father got her back (the moment when Henry intervened and Henry was able to transmit his own memories to the doll). Before the kidnapping, Charlotte and Sammy were going to sleep (a situation where kids often have a plush or a doll with them), and we know that Sammy had a toy during the kidnapping. Moreover, if Charlotte was indeed separated from her doll during her kidnapping, this explains Henry's obsessive behavior towards his daughter's toy: it was the last object she had before disappearing, totally the type of object on which a father incapable of mourning would become obsessed.
To sum up my idea:
  • Charlie is also influenced by Charlotte’s feelings.
  • Henry (and William and Elizabeth, who based their work on Henry’s) doesn’t know this (he stopped caring about Charlie after he understood that she wasn’t Charlotte after all).
  • All of Charlie’s memories from before Charlotte’s death mainly came from Charlotte’s own memories.
Or in a form of a timeline :
https://preview.redd.it/me5uz2xxve1d1.png?width=722&format=png&auto=webp&s=27b372a8eb6605752f059e61a13836758b329dfe
Two things to quickly add about this.
Firstly, in a more general sense about the series, this reinforces a certain link between the three main agony entities (whether they are creatures created solely from emotions or those possessing objects) in the series: Charlie, Eleanor, and the Mimic. If we consider that the backstory about the pendant mentioned by Talbert has any connection with Eleanor (which is rather implied) and that she (or at least her physical body) was created/re-used by Talbert (already more debatable, but I believe it's a fairly widespread theory about Eleanor? I’ll leave it to those who know better to discuss this in the comments), it seems relatively interesting that the three most conscious entities purely constituted of agony that we know of are all objects that were linked to a child before being infected by more violent emotions from an adult. It might be a silly remark; I haven't delved deeply into Eleanor's character for this lol.
Secondly, regarding the novels: the memory of Charlotte’s kidnapping could be the element that made Henry realize that William was indeed the person who kidnapped his daughter. TFC suggests that Henry understood before the MCI that William was his daughter’s murderer (notably because he seems to recover Charlizabeth before the children's disappearances). I generally assumed that Henry realized the truth about William when the latter stole the fourth Charlie model, but it would indeed make more sense for Henry to understand via an external event.
The trigger event between William and Henry is not William’s theft. After all, William has no valid reason to suddenly betray Henry and jeopardize his cover and his restaurant project with the Twisteds, just to steal an unfinished model (if he could, he would probably have stolen the third model, which was likely much more advanced and even maybe finished). Henry would have understood by visualizing Charlie’s memories or she might have mentioned the memory to her father. Henry would have turned against William, and in the panic, the latter would have returned to steal the only model easily available. This also explains why Henry didn’t tell the police that he knew William was responsible for the MCI and his daughter’s death even though he was convinced of it: revealing his undeniable proof would mean exposing the true nature of his daughter.
Well, that’s all from me!
(Btw, I wanted to add pictures from the graphic novels but couldn't because they actually didn't understand the twist and represented the ragdoll as classic Ella. Seriously I hate these books).
submitted by L0rem-Ipsum-Docet to fnaftheories [link] [comments]


2024.05.19 18:53 Antique_Obligation24 Debate

Hello, as a Christian i would like to have an open conversation with you and hear your thoughts. If you believe Jesus was a messenger of God wouldn't he contradict Hare Krishna religion in John 14:6 ? “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." and if Jesus was only God's messenger why would he say in John 10:30 "I and the Father are one" , thus making himself equal with God which would be blasphemic if he wasn't God himself. Being raised a as a Hare Krishna who converted to Christianity i would like to hear your thoughts on this.
submitted by Antique_Obligation24 to HareKrishna [link] [comments]


2024.05.19 18:50 mcm8279 [Discovery Trivia] Inside How ‘Star Trek: Discovery’ Transformed A Toronto University Library Into The Eternal Archive (TrekMovie)

[Discovery Trivia] Inside How ‘Star Trek: Discovery’ Transformed A Toronto University Library Into The Eternal Archive (TrekMovie)
TREKMOVIE: "Last week’s episode of Star Trek: Discovery, “Labyrinths,” featured an unusual location: the Thomas Fisher Rare Book Library at the University of Toronto. Star Trek fan Michael Cassabon, the Director of Advancement for the University of Toronto library system, assisted the production team on site and wrote about his experiences with the show and what makes the Fisher Library so unique."
Michael P. Cassabon:
"Melissa Warry-Smith, the location manager for Star Trek: Discovery (and most recently Section 31), and her team approached the University of Toronto in summer 2022 with a very big ask: to boldly film where no one has filmed before. As Canada’s largest keeper of ancient manuscripts and antiquarian books, the Thomas Fisher Rare Book Library holds powerful knowledge within its high, thick walls. It is a globally renowned rare book library, a gorgeous monument to human knowledge, but it is not known for being a filming location. Like, never.
But Warry-Smith’s thoughtful approach to the Fisher as the location for the Eternal Archive made a lot of sense. It wasn’t just that the Fisher’s brutalist architecture and vast interior space looked very sci-fi, but it also made sense because “Labyrinths” underlines the work of librarians and archivists in the preservation and pursuit of knowledge, intrinsic to the core values of Star Trek.
[...]
The Fisher is at the heart of the university’s main campus, which lies at the heart of the city of Toronto, one of the most diverse cities on the planet.
Modern-day Toronto is part of Trek canon (SNW: “Tomorrow, and Tomorrow, and Tomorrow”); for those of you keeping track, the library complex is a few blocks away from where the child Khan Noonien-Singh — the notorious ancestor of La’an — lives, and where an alt-universe Captain Kirk was killed trying to restore the timeline.
It is almost unheard of for filming to take place at the Fisher Library, but a rare exception was made for Star Trek: Discovery. Our library’s leadership believed that this collaboration would be a wonderful opportunity to showcase the enduring relevance of libraries in the human quest for meaning. Libraries connect people to the information they seek in their quest for knowledge. The executive producers dedicated the episode with thanks “to librarians everywhere, dedicated to the preservation of artifacts, knowledge, and truth.”
It was also important that the library was not just a pretty face in the background but was playing the role of a key “character” essential to uncover “the greatest power in the known galaxy,” as Dr. Kovich tells Michael way back in the season’s first episode. Kovich, of course, is played by the legendary David Cronenberg, an alum of the University of Toronto—it makes one wonder if he knew where the final clue was all along!
Filming at the Fisher occurred over three nights to avoid disrupting students and researchers. The production crew was remarkably efficient and respectful, especially given the tight schedule due to the impending medieval manuscript exhibition—our first in-person event since COVID-19. Every precaution was made to avoid putting the real-life ancient manuscripts in danger. The production crew was quite impressive in their respect and care. They had experience filming in sensitive locations in Toronto in the past; for example, scenes of Vulcan earlier in the season are filmed at the Aga Khan Museum in Toronto.
This isn’t the first time Star Trek has filmed at a library at the University of Toronto. U of T has a system of 40 libraries, and the Star Trek: Short Treks episode “Children of Mars”—the mini-prequel to Star Trek: Picard—was filmed at the library at U of T’s John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design. [...]
The absolute highlight for me was meeting Sonequa Martin-Green. She is as amazing and magnetic and gracious as everyone says. After watching her interact with the cast and crew, it was clear how they became a family, largely due to her leadership on and off the camera. David Ajala introduced me to Sonequa in the green room, which was our library admin conference room across from my office. The first thing she said to me was “Thank you for lending me your name [Michael].”
https://preview.redd.it/mptnhzl90f1d1.png?width=2000&format=png&auto=webp&s=69d9c4db98f5cdd0ea0393ab1baa602460ad7750
Sonequa Martin-Green flashes the Vulcan salute (photo: Paramount+)
This season of Discovery focuses on the quest for meaning, and filming at the Fisher felt serendipitous. The library’s dedication to preserving and exploring knowledge through the application of new technology mirrors Star Trek’s themes of discovery and understanding. Fittingly, the University of Toronto is situated at the heart of the city’s Discovery District, an area renowned for its concentration of research institutions, hospitals, and tech startups dedicated to innovation and advancement. It is also appropriate that the filming took place in a university library, considering how many researchers, scholars, and leaders have been inspired to pursue their careers in part because of Star Trek."
Michael P. Cassabon is the Director of Advancement for the University of Toronto library system and a lifelong fan of Star Trek.
Link (TrekMovie):
https://trekmovie.com/2024/05/17/inside-how-star-trek-discovery-transformed-a-toronto-university-library-into-the-eternal-archive-for-labyrinths/
submitted by mcm8279 to trektalk [link] [comments]


2024.05.19 18:48 editsrequiem I told my kids about my wife’s infidelity part 2

[You can see my first post in my profile]
Hello all, it’s been about a year since I informed you of what’s going on in my family, thank you all for the support, and to those who are against me, congratulations, you attacked someone on Reddit, happy? You literally did nothing to my spirit or opinions on this matter, so now you just look stupid. First of all, I’d like to clear some things up before I begin. 1. I DID NOT show the explicit pictures of my wife or her lover to my children (which I said in my first post, but people seemed to ignore it). I only showed them the screenshots of her flirting with her coworker, and the messages were not sexual, it was only her saying things like “I love you” and “my husband is so stupid for not noticing”. 2. The reason I rushed to tell my children so quickly is because I know my wife. And she would 110% try to shift the story so that they think I cheated on her, hence why I also took screenshots. I was worried she had already gotten to my daughters before she left for work, but fortunately she must have forgot in her haste and panic. She also tried to convince our friends and family that I was the one who cheated, but the screenshots saved me from that. Now the only people that are on her side, are her two best friends, and the coworker she cheated with. 3. While I didn’t say this before, I’ve tried very hard not to make my daughters hate my wife. While I personally hate her, and am completely over her. I still want my daughters to have their mother in their lives, and they have warmed up to her again quite a bit. 4. The reason I let my wife take my daughters is because I needed some time alone. And while I hate her with a passion now, I know the kids are safe with her, as she loves them more than life. Now, onto the update.
My lawyer served her the papers and she immediately broke down crying and called me over 100 times. Asking if I was serious and that she’s so sorry, and not to do this to her, not to do this to our family. Apparently she thought she still had a chance to get back together with me, are you kidding me? So I told her that it’s completely over, and what she did was unforgivable, and I hung up on her. She then tried to call me almost every hour on the dot, and I’ve ignored every single one. I have gone over to see my daughters whenever I could, but refused to go to her parents house when she was there. Luckily, her parents are on my side, and the only reason she hasn’t been thrown out is because she’s their daughter, and they still love her. I’ve signed my daughters up for joint therapy so they can talk to somebody about this if they need to. (thank you to all who suggested it) Everyone in my family and hers is shocked at how fast I got over her, but it’s natural for me. It’s just the way I think, I hate her, but I figure, if she didn’t love me, I shouldn’t love her. I may have gotten over her, but I’m still upset about my situation, my life is falling apart, but I have people on my side, and it softens the fall. My brother has invited me to go drinking with him and his friends, and I’ve had a great night every time. I even got drunk and slept with one of his friends, Kayla. Afterward, she asked me on a date, but I told her I’m not quite ready for that yet, she understood and we had breakfast together. I honestly really like her, and I feel that in the long run, she would be a good partner and a good stepmother to my daughters. But I’m not sure anyone is ready for that yet, so I’m holding off, but at some point, I’d like them to meet Kayla. My in-laws keep trying to tell me about how my wife is doing, and I keep telling them I don’t want to hear about her. They do get disappointed, because they’ve always really liked me, and probably don’t want our marriage to end. My brother has also come by to see me more often, sometimes Kayla and his friends come with him, I won’t lie, I enjoy the company. As for my job, I’m the owner of my own local cleaning company. While I have a lot of paperwork to do, I can do it all from home, so none of this interferes with my work schedule. I’ve spoiled my daughters rotten since then, every time I came over, I brought them some candy or a new toy. Not to try and keep them on my side, but because it’s a rough time for them, and they deserve it. As a whole, I thought my marriage ending would be the worst experience of my life, but the truth is, I’ve never felt better. I met a great woman, I still get to see my kids and have them in my life, and my ex is still in shambles because of this. I hate to admit it, but I would love to see how she’s dealing with this. I’ll update you all again when there’s more to talk about, sorry about that, this is just more of a rant about how much better my life is now instead of an update on my family. But for now, me and my daughters are happy, and until the next time I update you, I hope it stays this way.
submitted by editsrequiem to TrueOffMyChest [link] [comments]


2024.05.19 18:37 ProfessionalCan1950 Colette is prawn ready and wants to dance with me and Hank

Colette is prawn ready and wants to dance with me and Hank submitted by ProfessionalCan1950 to prawnready [link] [comments]


2024.05.19 18:31 Michael_of_Derry More than a thousand fish die in pollution incident

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/crggr227jg8o
Louise Cullen BBC NI Agriculture and Environment Correspondent Published 19 May 2024, 11:38 BST Updated 2 hours ago The Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (Daera) has confirmed a major fish kill in a river in County Antrim. It said more than 1,000 brown trout were killed due to slurry in the Four Mile Burn, a tributary of the Six Mile Water river. The incident happened at Newmills, near Doagh, and is thought to be farm-related. The Northern Ireland Environment Agency (NIEA) contacted the Antrim and District Angling Association (ADAA) on Friday, informing them an incident had been reported. In a video posted on social media, the ADAA said several of their members had walked three miles along the river and counted “hundreds of dead fish from last year’s crop, and perhaps thousands from this season’s crop". The group has called for Minister of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs Andrew Muir and the NIEA to “get a handle” on pollution incidents in the Lough Neagh system, which members say have left it “in tatters”. Dead fish in river IMAGE SOURCE, ADDA Image caption, Dead fish in Four Mile Burn, a tributary of the Six Mile Water river Mr Muir's party colleague, Alliance environment spokesperson John Blair MLA, said it was time for fines for polluters to be increased. "It’s immensely disappointing such occurrences are still happening, particularly when they take place in the catchment area of Lough Neagh," he said. He said increasing fines and penalties was "the only way polluters will learn and stop acts which risk our environment and its rich biodiversity”. In a statement, a Daera spokesperson said the NIEA deployed water quality inspectors to the area to confirm the report and assess the environmental impact. A joint investigation, with Daera Inland Fisheries, is "ongoing", they added. The department said the source of the pollution had been identified and the NIEA engaged with the owner of the premises involved throughout Saturday afternoon to identify the cause and to prevent further discharge to the river. "From the assessment of the impact on the fishery, a major fish kill has been confirmed, with 1,109 brown trout of varying ages being killed," it said. Anglers said they feared hundreds of young salmon had also died in the incident. "It's just devastation" John Mitchell Image caption, John Mitchell said the river has been completely wiped out President of the ADAA, John Mitchell, told BBC News NI that he believes the incident was due to agriculture. "It’s just devastation, the whole tributary is dead," he said. "We have a problem in Lough Neagh with the green algae, this is what is happening, these tributaries have to be kept clean and unfortunately they’re not. "All the tributaries have to be kept clean and feed into the main river to keep the river clean, and keep Lough Neagh clean. "This is where it starts and if it’s not clean here, it’s not going to be clean in Lough Neagh. "The problem is not Lough Neagh, it’s the feeder streams and the rivers running into Lough Neagh that’s causing the problem, which is coming from agriculture," Mr Mitchell said. John Ash Image caption, John Ash said more needs to be done by the farming community and the government to prevent such incidents from recurring John Ash from the ADAA explained how damaging the pollution had been to the fish population. "Three generations of fish have been wiped out in one go. It’s sad for us, we work very hard to generate a place where the fish can spawn every year and breed," he said. "These pollution incidents are hammering the salmon population and ultimately our dollaghan (brown trout) population. In one fell swoop they are wiped out and it’s the reason why Lough Neagh is the way that it is." He added that more needs to be done by the farming community and the government to prevent these kinds of incidents from recurring. "Agricultural foulage is a big problem, and it’s not the farmers’ fault – farmers need to farm. But there seems to be a huge amount of slurry left over and the government needs to step in and do something to help the farmers get rid of that slurry," Mr Ash said.
submitted by Michael_of_Derry to northernireland [link] [comments]


2024.05.19 18:28 PUMA_Microscope Would you like to see or try out a PUMA microscope in person? Will you be in the SF region in June 2024?

There will be a microscopy exhibit at the OpenSauce conference by John McMaster and the San Francisco Microscopical Society on June 15-16. PUMA will be in the exhibit in addition to other microscopes. Just saying.
Here is a link: https://opensauce.com/exhibits/
submitted by PUMA_Microscope to u/PUMA_Microscope [link] [comments]


2024.05.19 18:27 RepREVlEW Mad Paris Colette Rolex Milgauss from Jason

Mad Paris Colette Rolex Milgauss from Jason

W2C

My thoughts:

After seeing photos of this watch pop up on Jason's WhatsApp stories, I immediately asked him to send me one. Overall, the look and quality of the watch for its price is quite impressive imo. The movement works well and holds a charge for a good amount of time after winding it. The crown on the dial looks great and is raised. The dial also works very easily for winding the watch. The hands and numbers look pretty good. If I had one complaint, it's that the seconds hand and the numbers are a little thinner than the real one. The engravings on the clasps look clean and placed great. The clasp is easy to unclasp and lock in, I had no issues with that. Also, I have a large wrist, 23 cms is my preferred size when wearing things on it. This one fits a bit snug but had a tad more wiggle room than the No Date. So anyone with larger wrists, don't worry, this will definitely fit you. Let's be real, there's only like 5 of these total in the world, so if you're hopping out a Honda Civic working at Papa John's anyone who knows what these are will know what's up. If you like it, just ignore all the noise and rock what you like. Overall, I'm impressed with this watch at its price point, and I would definitely recommend it to anyone looking for a decent watch on a budget.

Experience with Seller

This is my now my third time dealing with Jason, I contacted him on WhatsApp, and he was extremely helpful and has always had great customer service. QCs always come quick, and he ships very quickly after you GL it. Shipping he says could take 2-4 weeks, but I always get my packages in about 7-10 days. Overall, the experience was great, and I have no issues with the transaction. I definitely recommend Jason for anyone looking for a quality, affordable, simple watch!
submitted by RepREVlEW to fashionrepsv2 [link] [comments]


2024.05.19 18:26 Toad-Master11 Printing only a few thousand of these.

Printing only a few thousand of these.
All the white will be holographic. Yes this is my design. I am going to a NERDs candy package look. The color green and red will be bright and matte finish.
I appreciate all the bad and more bad comments. If anyone can offer services to help me ?
This is my brand. And contrary to what people on here say. Selling this gummy for 8$ on the shelf and the store I sell at. They are selling fast.
You can’t find a 90mg d9 gummy anywhere.
My gummies are selling a lot. So for all the haters. I’m only getting this package because I’m selling a lot of gummies.
submitted by Toad-Master11 to PackagingDesign [link] [comments]


2024.05.19 18:25 RepREVlEW Mad Paris Colette Rolex Milgauss from Jason

Mad Paris Colette Rolex Milgauss from Jason

W2C

My thoughts:

After seeing photos of this watch pop up on Jason's WhatsApp stories, I immediately asked him to send me one. Overall, the look and quality of the watch for its price is quite impressive imo. The movement works well and holds a charge for a good amount of time after winding it. The crown on the dial looks great and is raised. The dial also works very easily for winding the watch. The hands and numbers look pretty good. If I had one complaint, it's that the seconds hand and the numbers are a little thinner than the real one. The engravings on the clasps look clean and placed great. The clasp is easy to unclasp and lock in, I had no issues with that. Also, I have a large wrist, 23 cms is my preferred size when wearing things on it. This one fits a bit snug but had a tad more wiggle room than the No Date. So anyone with larger wrists, don't worry, this will definitely fit you. Let's be real, there's only like 5 of these total in the world, so if you're hopping out a Honda Civic working at Papa John's anyone who knows what these are will know what's up. If you like it, just ignore all the noise and rock what you like. Overall, I'm impressed with this watch at its price point, and I would definitely recommend it to anyone looking for a decent watch on a budget.

Experience with Seller

This is my now my third time dealing with Jason, I contacted him on WhatsApp, and he was extremely helpful and has always had great customer service. QCs always come quick, and he ships very quickly after you GL it. Shipping he says could take 2-4 weeks, but I always get my packages in about 7-10 days. Overall, the experience was great, and I have no issues with the transaction. I definitely recommend Jason for anyone looking for a quality, affordable, simple watch!
submitted by RepREVlEW to ChinaTime [link] [comments]


2024.05.19 18:21 IrinaSophia Sunday Of The Myrrhbearers

Sunday Of The Myrrhbearers
The third Sunday of Holy Pascha is observed by the Orthodox Church as the Sunday of the Holy Myrrhbearers. The day commemorates when the women disciples of our Lord came to the tomb to anoint his body with myrrh-oils but found the tomb empty. As the woman wondered what this meant, angels appeared proclaiming that Christ had risen from the dead.
About the beginning of His thirty-second year, when the Lord Jesus was going throughout Galilee, preaching and working miracles, many women who had received of His beneficence left their own homeland and from then on followed after Him. They ministered unto Him out of their own possessions, even until His crucifixion and entombment; and afterwards, neither losing faith in Him after His death, nor fearing the wrath of the Jewish rulers, they came to His sepulcher, bearing the myrrh-oils they had prepared to anoint His body. It is because of the myrrh-oils that these God-loving women brought to the tomb of Jesus that they are called Myrrh-bearers.
Of those whose names are known are the following: first of all, the most holy Virgin Mary, who in Matthew 27:56 and Mark 15:40 is called "the mother of James and Joses" (these are the sons of Joseph by a previous marriage, and she was therefore their step-mother); Mary Magdalene (celebrated July 22); Mary, the wife of Clopas; Joanna, wife of Chouza, a steward of Herod Antipas; Salome, the mother of the sons of Zebedee; Mary and Martha, the sisters of Lazarus; and Susanna. As for the names of the rest of them, the evangelists have kept silence (Matthew 217:55-56; 28:1-10. Mark 15:40-41.
Luke 8:1-3; 23:55-24:11, 22-24. John 19:25; 20:11-18. Acts 1:14.) Together with them we celebrate also the secret disciples of the Savior, Joseph and Nicodemus. Of these, Nicodemus was probably a Jerusalemite, a prominent leader among the Jews and of the order of the Pharisees, learned in the Law and instructed in the Holy Scriptures. He had believed in Christ when, at the beginning of our Savior's preaching of salvation, he came to Him by night. Furthermore, he brought some one hundred pounds of myrrh-oils and an aromatic mixture of aloes and spices out of reverence for the divine Teacher (John 19:39). Joseph, who was from the city of Arimathea, was a wealthy and noble man, and one of the counselors who were in Jerusalem. He went bodly unto Pilate and asked for the body of Jesus, and together with Nicodemus he gave Him burial. Since time did not permit the preparation of another tomb, he placed the Lord's body in his own tomb which was hewn out of rock, as the Evangelist says (Matthew 27:60).
The Sunday of the Holy Myrrhbearers is celebrated with the Divine Liturgy of Saint John Chrysostom. On this Sunday and throughout the Paschal period until the Apodosis or leave-taking of Pascha, the day before the Feast of the Ascension, the services begin with the chanting of the troparion of Pascha, "Christ is risen..."
Scripture readings for the feast are the following: At Orthros: Luke 24:1-12; At the Divine Liturgy: Acts 6:1-7 and Mark 15:43-16:8.
(from goarch.org)
submitted by IrinaSophia to OrthodoxGreece [link] [comments]


2024.05.19 18:20 IrinaSophia Sunday Of The Myrrhbearers

Sunday Of The Myrrhbearers
The third Sunday of Holy Pascha is observed by the Orthodox Church as the Sunday of the Holy Myrrhbearers. The day commemorates when the women disciples of our Lord came to the tomb to anoint his body with myrrh-oils but found the tomb empty. As the woman wondered what this meant, angels appeared proclaiming that Christ had risen from the dead.
About the beginning of His thirty-second year, when the Lord Jesus was going throughout Galilee, preaching and working miracles, many women who had received of His beneficence left their own homeland and from then on followed after Him. They ministered unto Him out of their own possessions, even until His crucifixion and entombment; and afterwards, neither losing faith in Him after His death, nor fearing the wrath of the Jewish rulers, they came to His sepulcher, bearing the myrrh-oils they had prepared to anoint His body. It is because of the myrrh-oils that these God-loving women brought to the tomb of Jesus that they are called Myrrh-bearers.
Of those whose names are known are the following: first of all, the most holy Virgin Mary, who in Matthew 27:56 and Mark 15:40 is called "the mother of James and Joses" (these are the sons of Joseph by a previous marriage, and she was therefore their step-mother); Mary Magdalene (celebrated July 22); Mary, the wife of Clopas; Joanna, wife of Chouza, a steward of Herod Antipas; Salome, the mother of the sons of Zebedee; Mary and Martha, the sisters of Lazarus; and Susanna. As for the names of the rest of them, the evangelists have kept silence (Matthew 217:55-56; 28:1-10. Mark 15:40-41.
Luke 8:1-3; 23:55-24:11, 22-24. John 19:25; 20:11-18. Acts 1:14.) Together with them we celebrate also the secret disciples of the Savior, Joseph and Nicodemus. Of these, Nicodemus was probably a Jerusalemite, a prominent leader among the Jews and of the order of the Pharisees, learned in the Law and instructed in the Holy Scriptures. He had believed in Christ when, at the beginning of our Savior's preaching of salvation, he came to Him by night. Furthermore, he brought some one hundred pounds of myrrh-oils and an aromatic mixture of aloes and spices out of reverence for the divine Teacher (John 19:39). Joseph, who was from the city of Arimathea, was a wealthy and noble man, and one of the counselors who were in Jerusalem. He went bodly unto Pilate and asked for the body of Jesus, and together with Nicodemus he gave Him burial. Since time did not permit the preparation of another tomb, he placed the Lord's body in his own tomb which was hewn out of rock, as the Evangelist says (Matthew 27:60).
The Sunday of the Holy Myrrhbearers is celebrated with the Divine Liturgy of Saint John Chrysostom. On this Sunday and throughout the Paschal period until the Apodosis or leave-taking of Pascha, the day before the Feast of the Ascension, the services begin with the chanting of the troparion of Pascha, "Christ is risen..."
Scripture readings for the feast are the following: At Orthros: Luke 24:1-12; At the Divine Liturgy: Acts 6:1-7 and Mark 15:43-16:8.
(from goarch.org)
submitted by IrinaSophia to OrthodoxChristianity [link] [comments]


2024.05.19 18:18 RepREVlEW Mad Paris Colette Rolex Milgauss from Jason

Mad Paris Colette Rolex Milgauss from Jason

W2C

My thoughts:

After seeing photos of this watch pop up on Jason's WhatsApp stories, I immediately asked him to send me one. Overall, the look and quality of the watch for its price is quite impressive imo. The movement works well and holds a charge for a good amount of time after winding it. The crown on the dial looks great and is raised. The dial also works very easily for winding the watch. The hands and numbers look pretty good. If I had one complaint, it's that the seconds hand and the numbers are a little thinner than the real one. The engravings on the clasps look clean and placed great. The clasp is easy to unclasp and lock in, I had no issues with that. Also, I have a large wrist, 23 cms is my preferred size when wearing things on it. This one fits a bit snug but had a tad more wiggle room than the No Date. So anyone with larger wrists, don't worry, this will definitely fit you. Let's be real, there's only like 5 of these total in the world, so if you're hopping out a Honda Civic working at Papa John's anyone who knows what these are will know what's up. If you like it, just ignore all the noise and rock what you like. Overall, I'm impressed with this watch at its price point, and I would definitely recommend it to anyone looking for a decent watch on a budget.

Experience with Seller

This is my now my third time dealing with Jason, I contacted him on WhatsApp, and he was extremely helpful and has always had great customer service. QCs always come quick, and he ships very quickly after you GL it. Shipping he says could take 2-4 weeks, but I always get my packages in about 7-10 days. Overall, the experience was great, and I have no issues with the transaction. I definitely recommend Jason for anyone looking for a quality, affordable, simple watch!
submitted by RepREVlEW to WorldOfReps [link] [comments]


2024.05.19 18:16 condensed-ilk Mearsheimer says that the US does not support Israel because they're strategic allies but because of the Israeli Lobby

https://youtu.be/jqPQ5dUfSTw?t=672
Regardless of your opinions of John Mearsheimer's beliefs about I/P or his support of Palestine, what are your thoughts about him saying that the US does not support Israel for strategic interests but instead because of the Israeli lobby's influence in US politics and policy?
It's well known that the Israeli lobby is heavily influential in US politics and policy. But Mearsheimer makes a point that the lobby is acting more openly in recent years, and that its existence, growth, and influence in US policy highlights that the US doesn't support Israel due to the US' own strategic calculations but because of the lobby itself. If Israel was a strategic ally of the US -- like if the US supported Israel because it's a democracy in the middle east (a claim many make including Destiny) -- then Israel would not need such a powerful lobby that pushes for politicians to support Israel unconditionally or pushes the narrative that the US and Israel are strategic allies because that support would already exist. The lobby's existence and power highlights that Israel is not US' ally, or perhaps not as much as we're told.
Thoughts?
EDIT - This is his argument not mine.
submitted by condensed-ilk to Destiny [link] [comments]


2024.05.19 18:10 authorsheart Employee Likes to Gift Trash at Christmas

Oh, boy, Charlotte, do I have a doozy for you. It’s such a doozy that it comes in 2 parts. I guess it would qualify as petty revenge, since that’s the only flair that fit, but it’s more of an entitled Karen story.
For the sake of telling the story a little smoother, I'm going to explain some things up front. I (female, early 30s; let's call me Molly) am the manager in the accounting office of a very small loan company. Like, really small. We have less than 30 offices with only 2 employees at each office. For this reason, we are kind of low-tech, old-fashioned. I'm talking paper timesheets that get faxed to our office (we're also the corporate office that handles the payroll). Our office hours are 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. with a half-hour lunch. Me & my employee (who we'll call Sally) work this shift. Our boss (who we'll call Greg) is the owner & CEO. He works in the office starting at 9:00 a.m. till whenever he leaves for the day. Most of the time, that's around the time we leave, sometimes it's earlier due to errands he needs to run.
So, in Oct 2022, Sally (female, early 30s) gave us a note that her doctor wants to have daily appointments with her indefinitely. She let us know she would need to leave at 3:30 every day. Greg granted that request & even gave her the opportunity to come in early so she didn't miss any of her 8 hours each day. So, she began coming to work between 6:45 & 7:00 & would take however long of a lunch she needed to so she would have an 8-hour day.
Due to a combination of our fiscal year-end work in Oct & Nov 2022, playing catch-up from Dec 2022 to Feb 2023, & the other coworker (who we'll call Irene) leaving the company in Feb 2023 so we had to play catch-up again for several months before we got used to the bigger workload, I hadn't been able to pay too close attention to Sally's work. But in the middle of Aug 2023, I began to suspect her. I realized that the tasks Sally had in the morning would usually take me an hour & a half to do, which meant I would be relatively finished by the time I would arrive at 8:30. Sally, on the other hand, would only have stuff halfway done. Now, I knew Sally worked slower than me since I knew the job better than she did, but this still seemed very slow. I began to suspect Sally was either not arriving as early as she said she was (she was the only one in the office before 8:30) or she was arriving on time but wasn't working.
On Aug 21 (Monday), I decided to come in early to the office since I had to make up time due to a doctor appointment later in the week. So, I arrived at work at 6:40. 6:45 rolled around...no Sally. 6:50...no Sally. 7:00...same thing. Sally arrived at 7:20. Now, ok, maybe she ran into traffic. However, that's a bit of a coincidence that the one day I show up early unannounced is also the day she happens to be late. But I waited to see what time Sally would write down on the timesheet. However, she didn't write down her time until Tuesday right before she left. She had written down that she had arrived at 7:05. I asked her about it, and her response was "I must have copied it down wrong from my spreadsheet." That's strange, 'cause you hadn't arrived at 7:05 any other day that week. Just where did you copy it down from?
Now, I am curious as to what time Sally puts down when she believes no one has seen what time she arrives. So, for Sept 4-15, I would arrive in the parking lot across the street & read a book & eat breakfast while I wait to see what time Sally would arrive. Every single day, she would arrive around 7:15 or 7:20, but would write down 6:45 or 6:50, a half hour discrepancy every single day. & we have no way of knowing how long she's been stealing a half hour every day. She could have been doing this for the past year since her schedule changed.
On Sept 18, I write down Sally's actual times from these 2 weeks on a paper & tell her to correct all the times I indicated. Sally says that she will use the office clock to write down her times from now on. Wait a minute, you're saying that your phone is a half hour earlier than the rest of the world? But only when you arrive at work. When you go to lunch & leave work, it matches the rest of the clocks. & then switches during the night so your arrival time can be wrong again the next day? Wow, that's a pretty glitchy phone you got there.
On Sept 20 after Sally left, I installed a camera that connects to an app in my phone. I put the camera in a place where it wouldn't be able to see any computers/paperwork & turned off the microphone (I didn't want to risk any company info being seen/heard). I only needed to see when Sally arrived. Where I ended up placing it, I was able to see Sally where she sat at her desk.
On three of the following days, Sally would arrive 10 to 15 minutes after the time she would write down. I speak with Greg about this, & we decide to write her up. By the way, usually when an employee is caught forging the timesheet like this, it's an immediate termination. At any other office, she would have gotten fired in the beginning of Sept after I first discovered the half hour forgery. I am deciding to give her a chance to make this whole thing right.
On Sept 26 (Tuesday), I give Sally the write up when she arrives.
Sally: I'll sign it, but I don't know why. I mean, I get here at 7:00. (Ok, there's a sign right there. Who signs an official write up when their employer is lying or setting them up?)
Me: I've observed you arriving between 7:10 & 7:15.
Sally reads the write up & then keeps it at her desk for a bit after signing it. After plenty of time, I ask for it back. She grabs it, so I lean forward & hold my hand out (our desks are right next to each other), but Sally flings it at my desk. The whole thing is made better by the fact that Greg is out of town Tuesday thru Thursday. So, Sally proceeds to be angry & have an attitude all the way through Thursday. She refuses to talk or answer the phones. She does that tossing/flicking-papers-around, aggressive-typing, heavily-setting-things-down thing people do when they're frustrated or angry (which she did all...day...long). She sped out of the parking lot & down the street so fast that I could hear her engine rev & tires squeal from inside the building.
On Sept 27 (Wednesday), Sally is still doing that slamming things thing. I enjoy not responding to her whatsoever. I could see out of the corner of my eye that she would slam something down & look at me. I wouldn't give any kind of reaction, wouldn't look at her, & it would piss her off. Sally would then start slamming things around again. I admit, that was fun.
On Sept 28 (Thursday), I see on the camera that Sally arrives at 7:00, but then I watch her sit on her phone for 45 minutes! She is still having attitude issues, &—unbelievably—is still slamming things. After she leaves for the day, I then see the calendar that Sally keeps on her desk as I was passing by. On the box for Sept 26 (the day she was written up), she had written the words "F***ING JOKE!". The audacity of her to write that in plain view of everyone in the office & think she wouldn't get in trouble for it.
On Sept 29 (Friday), Sally arrives at 7:00 but sits on her phone for 30 minutes WHILE VAPING! (Not sure about other cities or states, but it's illegal to smoke or vape inside a building in the city where our office is.) But Greg is back this day, & I had been texting him what's been going on. He had texted back he wanted to do a meeting on Friday. So, the 3 of us go into the breakroom for a meeting.
Greg: So, Sally, what's been going on with this timesheet thing?
Sally: I just, I forget to write down the time when I arrive.
Greg: Ok, well, whether it's done on purpose or through negligence, we can't have wrong times on the timesheet. So, from now on, you won't be able to come to work before Molly gets here at 8:30. Now, are there any other problems you'd like to discuss with us?
Sally: (begins getting worked up) I just, I feel like I can't talk to her. She creates such a hostile work environment.
Now, I am blown away. Me? Hostile? I'm autistic, so I'm naturally shy & hate socializing, so I usually don't talk to anyone very much. Everyone I tell this story to, their eyes widen when I mention this, 'cause there's no way anyone would ever describe me as hostile.
Luckily, Greg interrupts her to defend me: This isn't a hostile work environment.
Sally: (backpedaling) Well, I mean, she gets mad at her printer & bangs on it, & that just flashes me back to stuff. I mean, I'm trying to work on myself & the anxiety, & she just sends me back.
Oh, so now, we're claiming we have PTSD & that my "violent" actions are giving her flashbacks? Um, who is it laughing right along with me every time my printer jams? (By the way, I know she's lying about the PTSD, 'cause I have a couple friends with PTSD & recognize the signs. Sally doesn't show any sign of fear or panic or shrinking away from things, nothing like that. There are no signs whatsoever of her being alarmed by anything I do.) Oh, not to mention the double standards. You're allowed to slam things around (for 3 straight days, by the way), but I'm not?
Anyway, we wrap up the meeting after Greg underlines (for Sally's benefit) that everyone in the office needs to get along.
On Oct 2 (the next Monday), I had a good drive & happened to get there at 8:20. Sally arrives at 8:25 & comes in, stopping at my desk.
Sally: (annoyed) Are you gonna be early all week?
Me: (frowning & caught off-guard) Um, I don't know. It just depends how long my drive takes.
Sally: (with a snarky attitude) 'Cause I had to keep driving around waiting for you, so if you're gonna be early, I'd like to know.
Ok, first of all, no one is forcing you to drive around. You can park your car in the parking lot. Do you really think we're gonna fire you for sitting in the parking lot while you wait for me? We only said you couldn't come in & work before I do. & second, it's none of your business when I get to work. My shift starts at 8:30, therefore, you should aim for 8:30, just like Greg told you to do. How am I supposed to predict the exact minute I get to work? & you're gonna get angry at me 'cause I didn't show up before my shift starts? Since when is it a requirement of mine to come into work before I start working?
Well, a bit of malicious compliance in this entitled story: if I can see I'm going to arrive at work more than 5 minutes early, I stop at the store just down the road & shop until 8:30. 'Cause guess what? Sally gets there who knows how early & sits in the gas station across the street, waiting for me. Fine, you wanna be that way? I can be petty, too.
By the way, Sally has a radio talk show she listens to from before I get to work until it ends at 10:00. I'm not into talk shows, but it wasn't too annoying (most of the time), so I didn't say anything about it. The reason why I started having a problem listening to it was that they would get into inappropriate things (s** toy review, for example). It made me super uncomfortable when they did segments like this. From the moment Sally was written up, she started only listening to the show on her headphones, thinking she was punishing me by me not getting to hear the show. Joke's on her. Sally did me a favor by not having to listen to that thing.
Sally was also told that she is no longer allowed to take smoke breaks on the clock. As no one else in the office takes breaks but chooses to work through them, this change would be made so all employees were equal now. But here’s the interesting thing: Sally suddenly stopped taking smoke breaks at all, but her bathroom breaks grew more numerous & longer. When she had been taking smoke breaks, the alarm on her phone would go off at specific times, such as 2:00. She would then go outside to take her smoke break. After the on-the-clock-smoke-break privilege was taken away, the same alarms would go off, such as 2:00. She would then disappear to the bathroom for 15 minutes. & I even smelled smoke in there when I went in there right after one of these long bathroom breaks.
Ever since the write up, there’s been attitude every once in a while. Most of the time, I have no idea what it is I did that could possibly have set her off that day. All I know is that Sally’s suddenly slamming things around again (hmm, PTSD cured now, is it?). & she’s still constantly making mistakes (like she’s always done).
On Nov 27, Sally is working on the Funding (loan proceeds funded onto a customer’s debit card). What we do is get the list of customers, determine how much the office funded that customer, transfer the money from the office’s bank account to the holding account, & then transfer the total from the holding account to the account that directly funds the debit cards to replenish the money. We had two customers with similar names (say, John Smith & Jack Smith). Sally hadn’t paid attention to the whole name & had applied John’s $0 funding to Jack. However, Jack had been funded $250. So, that money was missed, & I had to make a separate transfer for it.
On Dec 4, Sally is working on the Funding & writes down $0 for a customer. But the report from the office says he actually got $96.
On Dec 8 & 9, we discovered 2 checks that were supposed to be sent to our office (one from Oct, one from Sept). Neither had been cashed, & neither had ever reached us, even though we had the rest of the paperwork that would have come with those checks. Due to the dots I had connected, I had a pretty strong hunch that Sally wasn’t thoroughly checking the mail envelopes to make sure they’d been completely emptied before they got thrown away. I believed these checks were still in some envelopes that were then thrown away by Sally.
On Dec 11, on the bank reconciliation sheets we work at the end of the month (like balancing a checkbook), one of Sally’s offices was out of balance by $68, & she couldn’t find it. I couldn’t find it, either. I pulled out the one done for the month before. I couldn’t find it there, either. But I did notice one thing. The checks that hadn’t cleared the bank yet didn’t add up to the total amount of outstanding checks Sally had written down. By $68. I go back to the month before that one. There were a total of $68 in old checks that never got cashed & therefore should have gotten written off on the fiscal year-end at the end of Oct. But she hadn’t transferred them to the new month’s sheet. So, now, we have to hold onto them for a whole year to write off next Oct.
The same day, I went through all the offices to double check the GL codes that we post the expense checks to (GL codes determine where an expense gets coded, e.g., post an electricity payment to the GL code for utilities). The day previously, Sally had gotten several GL codes incorrect in the Miller office. She had forgotten to change the codes from the one for the Checkbook to the ones for the expense account. She had caught those ones since it affected the balance of the Checkbook, so I had helped her fix those properly. However, there were expense checks sent to a GL code that wasn’t the right one that Sally hadn’t caught.
I talk with Greg, as I feel that every time I turn around, I am either retraining Sally on stuff I’ve trained her on multiple times, I’m correcting mistakes on stuff Sally should know how to do by now (‘cause again, I’ve trained her multiple times), or I’m disciplining Sally about stuff she’s doing wrong. Greg asks how many mistakes due to carelessness she’s made in the last 2 weeks. I check my notes & tell him 4. He says that’s too excessive for an accounting office. We need to write her up.
So, I made the write up, but I just know I’m going to be dealing with the same attitude as the last time I had to write her up. & guess what? Greg’s out of town till Thursday again. I used my phone this time to record the audio of the interaction. That way, if Sally has attitude towards me again, I’m able to play the recording to Greg so he can hear what Sally’s like when he’s not here (which is why the following conversation is pretty much word for word).
On Dec 12 (Tuesday), I sat her down first thing.
Me: So, in the past couple weeks, I’ve noticed some errors happening due to carelessness, & they’ve become a bit excessive for an accounting office. The most important thing in an accounting office is accuracy. That’s why we focus so much on thoroughness & attention to detail. So, whatever needs to happen to lessen those errors, whether it’s slowing the pace of the work itself or double & triple-checking the work before it’s finished, it needs to happen. For example, when I work the payroll, after I get the total for all the offices, I then subtract each person’s individual hours to double check my entries. That way, if there is an error, at least I know it wasn’t ‘cause I was going too fast or not paying attention or something. So, whatever you need to do to decrease the mistakes, please—
Sally: What errors are we talking about?
Me: I have a page here with the items from the last couple weeks. (hand her the write up)
Sally: (reads the pages for a minute) Ok…
Me: So, whatever you need to do to—
Sally: (talking quickly ‘cause she’s pissed now) I’m gonna need more time & focus strictly on Funding. I don’t wanna touch mail, I don’t wanna touch anything else. I wanna focus strictly on that. ‘Cause I’m getting 80 plus a day (which was a lie, we never get nearly that much), & now, I’m gonna start getting in trouble if it’s not 110%. I am human. I will make mistakes. So, if that’s not allowed, then…(shrugs) let me know, I guess. I’ll talk to Greg & I guess figure something out. I am human, & I am gonna make mistakes, A. B, I feel like crap. He (Greg) has been in here sick the last week. I caught whatever he has. I’ve been hacking. I’ve been sicker than sh** the last week. I am trying. You guys usually have until the 12th to close the month. Since I’ve worked here, I’ve closed before the 8th. Yeah, I made mistakes. I told you I made a mistake on the Miller office. I knew what happened. So, to throw it in my face again that I already made that mistake is kinda rude, but…(shrugs) I’m actually kinda shocked to see that on there.
Me: Well, you did catch the errors involving the Checkbook, but there were other mistakes on that office that you didn’t catch, & that’s the reason that was listed on there.
Sally goes back to her work, & I decide to not ask her to sign the write up I had given her right away since she was diving right into the Funding. She had expressed she wanted to focus solely on it to minimize mistakes. I wanted to use positive reinforcement to convey that this was good behavior & good thinking, so I decided to wait for her to finish before asking her to sign & return the write up.
Now, here’s the issues with her little outburst above.
  1. Sally is complaining that she’s human & makes mistakes & we’re not allowing mistakes. We’re not saying that she can’t make mistakes, ‘cause she’s right. Everyone makes mistakes; I make mistakes. What we’re saying is that she’s making mistakes much too often.
  2. Sally says the reason for these mistakes the last 2 weeks is ‘cause she’s been sick the last week or so ‘cause she caught what Greg had (do you see the timing problem there?). Also, these kinds of mistakes have been happening for months & months. I only brought these examples up ‘cause they were recent.
  3. Sally pointed out the fact that she closes each month really quick. We don’t care how fast things get done. Our goal isn’t to get things done quickly but to get things done accurately. If we happen to get it done quickly, that’s just a bonus. We would rather things go slow than to have errors causing problems or costing us money ‘cause we didn’t take the time to make sure it was correct.
  4. Sally states it’s rude that I’m throwing her error back in her face (you already know my reaction to that). She obviously doesn’t know how a job works. Just ‘cause we discussed this error already doesn’t mean it can’t go on the write up. This is just one of the examples that required us to do a write up. We’re not doing this ‘cause we want to write you up or that we’re looking for excuses to get you in trouble. We’re doing our job. If a situation needs correcting, we have to correct it. We can’t just ignore it. & obviously, me talking about your errors all these months hasn’t helped. You’re still making the same mistakes. So, now, we’ve had to escalate to a write up on paper.
Sally doesn’t say another word. She, as expected, starts doing her tossing-things-‘cause-I’m-pissed-off thing. I just go back to my work. I’ve said my piece, now we can put it behind us & move on.
Now, we have until 10:30 to make the transfers for this Funding program in order to get the money back to the account the same day. We are still missing the paperwork for 2 customers from an office. (FYI, when we’re missing paperwork, we call the office & ask them to fax it. If we still don’t get it when it gets close to the transfer deadline, we call again & just ask for the amount to get it done.) So, at 10:20, Sally turns to me.
Sally: What do I do for these 2 customers? Do I just skip them?
Me: (frowning) Do what you usually do when you don’t have the paperwork in time. Call the office—
Sally: (in a sharp tone) I did. (she’s assuming I mean call the office to tell them to fax it)
Me: (ignoring her attitude outburst) Call up the office & ask for the dollar amounts.
Sally: But I don’t want to write down the amount without seeing the actual paperwork. If I’m gonna get in trouble for errors now, I don’t want to take down what could be the wrong dollar amount over the phone. I mean, I think that’s only fair to me.
Me: In the instances that were mentioned, they weren’t cases of taking down an amount over the phone. They were instances where we had paperwork or a report to see the amount. We would never write you up if there was a possibility that the office gave you the wrong amount over the phone.
Sally stares at me for a second & turns back to her desk. I turn back to my own work as Sally then calls up the office. I had to deal with her attitude the rest of the day: throwing mail into the mailbox, throwing open the letter folding machine so it made a big bang on the table. I was trying to still be the usual friendly, professional person I am at work; I told her “See you tomorrow” & everything. Sally wouldn’t talk to me unless she had to.
This is when I discovered that Sally has a habit of lashing out at me when she gets in trouble. The first write up involved her trying to drag me under the bus by claiming I’m hostile. This time, it was more personal. See, we do a Christmas gift exchange at the office; we each buy each other a gift. I had searched over & over trying to find something Sally would like. I finally found this desk calendar with gnomes on it (she likes both of these things), so I got it & a couple small items. I open my gift from Sally, & among a few cheap little things, I found…Sally’s own nearly empty bottle of nail polish remover. Wow, this is the thanks I get for not firing you back in Sept with the whole timesheet forgery thing?
& this is where I leave you until Part 2, the conclusion.
submitted by authorsheart to CharlotteDobreYouTube [link] [comments]


2024.05.19 18:04 AcrobaticWin3240 #7 Halloween 6: The Curse of Michael Myers (1995)

#7 Halloween 6: The Curse of Michael Myers (1995)
Over the years the more I watch this film them more I like it. Of course the cult & Men in Black shit never worked for me but, this film nails the fall vibe. Michael was quicker than in the previous movies and straight forward with the kills. He had some viciousness in him i like to see. The acting was mostly good from all characters. The pace of the film was pretty good. The kills were great. Tons of gore. The way this movie captures each scene with the lighting whether it’s shot indoors or outdoors. The first 5-10 mins grabs your attention. Michael chasing Jamie and then turning on the farming equipment to shred through her body. The blood splat on the sheets for Debra’s kill. And of course when John’s head exploded from Michael stabbing him into the power box was sweet asf. The hospital kills with the flashing lights was good eye candy for the film and different. Michael’s mask actually looked good and scary after the complete “wtf mask is that” in Halloween 5 lmao. The final chase scene wasn’t anything special. Overall this movie has rewatch ability and deserves to be in the middle of the pack of this franchise.
submitted by AcrobaticWin3240 to Halloweenmovies [link] [comments]


2024.05.19 18:02 fuego91178 Dirty Soul Soap Review

Dirty Soul Soap Review
Not BBW related but here’s a review on my very small sample order of Dirty Soul Soap Co.
I ordered these back in April. I received them almost 2 weeks ago and I’ve let them steep to become stronger.
This is my opinion. Please don’t come for me.
Let me say I am a huge fan of small businesses (I am one myself) and love to support others 💕
First up: 🍩 Raspberry Jelly Donut: I had high hopes for this one but it has a jasmine floral scent to it. I thought it was just me but I asked my husband, my adult son and DIL and they all said the same thing.
🍬Cotton Candy Dreams: Not mad at it but not thrilled. It’s very light. Hopefully it’ll get stronger as it steeps longer 🤞🏻
☕️Whipped Coffee: Very light coffee/espresso scent. I am getting more vanilla than anything. Again, maybe steeping longer will help.
💕Lavender Marshmallow Macarons: It’s exactly what the name says. It’s a very nice scent. It’s just like BBW lavender vanilla aromatherapy line. I don’t smell much of the macaron.
🔥Toasted Marshmallow: I swear this is the same as the Lavender Marshmallow. There is no difference. 🤷🏻‍♀️ 4 of us say the same.
Now to the 🪦Moonlight Graveyard:
A lot of you hated this scent. But I absolutely LOVED the whole line of it and was disappointed they didn’t make a body care in it. (Yes, I’m weird). But this dupe is ABSOLUTELY IDENTICAL! I bought two because of my high expectations and it did NOT disappoint! I will be ordering the larger size spray!
I think they’re a hit or miss for what I’ve ordered but I will be ordering more. 💗
submitted by fuego91178 to bathandbodyworks [link] [comments]


http://swiebodzin.info