Things to say for chinese whispers the game

Hello there, I was raised Christian and am familiar with the Bible and what is says what to do about nonbelievers so I'm confused a bit about the quran and Muslim faith.
Are there sects of Islam where they interpret the quran and says what to do about non believers? I've known a few Muslims growing up who were fantastic people and did not seem to care that I was a non Muslim.
I'm just trying to clear things up. Thank you for your time and answers.

Hello! Just like the title says: I teach, I enjoy running, and I enjoy all things nerdy! Anime, video games (phone trading card games, PC games like WoW, and Switch mainly), and dungeons and dragons! We don't have to share any particular interests if you'd like to chat! Feel free to reach out!

Been playing for a while and recently noticed Tsuki wasn't interacting with many things from the bag. Checked it and saw many missing (specifically only food) items. Oddly enough, it's just the generic year-round stuff, not the halloween. Added the parsnaps from when he first used some items and the catalog.
Started purchasing them again and they immediately (immediately being the next day) disappeared haha. For example, just today I bought the bubblegum, sour strips, peppermint, and trail mix. I know I didn't accidentally sell them as I routinely forget to fish.
Not a huge deal, just thought I'd report it, and am curious if anyone else has noticed this. :)

Is there anywhere where we can find documentation on how certain mechanics work? I've tried the wiki, but it's a fucking mess that mostly refers to the main PC series (BTD 1 through 6) and there's nearly nothing about BTDB, especially mobile.
I'm asking because lately I've been noticing lots of inconsistencies with certain aspects of the game. For example, sometimes in round 1 you'll get your base income 3 times before round 2 hits. Sometimes the third income will hit the exact moment round 2 starts, which messes up the money gain with Cobra farms.
Sometimes for whatever reason I end up with either $5 more or $5 less by round two, which again messes some strategies which rely on having the specific and exact amount of money needed for certain things by round two. $5 less sounds like nothing, but it slows said strategies down quite a bit.
I can't make sense of any of it and I can't find any resource that explains how income works, why sometimes it's higher, why sometimes it's slower / faster.

I am so tired, mentally and physically. I don't know what to do anymore.
My hubby (60m) was diagnosed with GBM of the left parietal lobe on May 2, 2023. He had surgery on May 4, followed by radiation and chemo. He was doing really well until last month, when he was hospitalized with seizures. Mind you, this was his first setback, 11 months post diagnosis, and it is NOT due to tumor progression.
The seizures really took a lot away from him. His short term memory is gone, and his long term memory is iffy at times. His right side is weak. He has problems discerning reality from dreams at times. He refused to stay in hospital rehab and they discharged him 4 days after he arrived. Regardless of the strain it put on me, he insisted on coming home, and I was tired of arguing with him about it daily, especially after spending a week at his bedside while he was unconscious. He could barely walk, but home he came.
He has gotten stronger over the past month. He pushes himself to walk and do things around the house, even when he shouldn't. His recovery isn't fast enough for him, though. He is convinced that he is slipping. I have told him that maybe he would be further along if he had stayed in rehab, or did any of the things that were recommended by his doctors. But they don't know anything, and neither do I, don't you know?
I understand that he is hurting. I understand that he is ill. I understand that this disease is horrible, and that it will eventually take him. But I can only take so much mollycoddling and feeling sorry for one's self! It's been over a year, and he is STILL HERE! He is functioning. He is SO VERY LUCKY to be alive! I see people in this group who lose loved ones within months or weeks of diagnosis, and my heart breaks for them! His focus is only on what he has lost, and on his impending demise, instead of being thankful for the time with which he has has been blessed.
And that makes me angry. So very angry! If I said this to anyone outside of this group, you lovely people who actually get it because you are going through it on one side or the other, I would get shocked, pearl clutching gasps of horror. "How can you say that about someone with cancer?!" Quite easily, actually. Constantly feeling sorry for himself isn't helping a thing. It's hurting his recovery. I'm of the "just grit your teeth and do what you must" school of thought, which is probably why his attitude annoys me so! I want him to FIGHT, not roll over and give up! If anyone had said "That's it. There's nothing more we can do", I would be so much more understanding. But that isn't so! Make peace then, but not before.
Thanks for letting me vent.

In December of last year, my wife and I had our first child, and it was a very traumatic ordeal, she spent 6 weeks in the NICU before we could take her home, and we have a whole host of doctors & therapists for her now.
She is doing fantastic, one of her therapists calls her a miracle baby, we are very proud.
The biggest concern with our daughter is developing her fine motor skills. Multiple doctors and therapists repeatedly expressed a goal of her being able to not only hold a toy, but actively pass it between her hands, I guess this is a significant milestone, especially in our unique situation.
For many weeks, she got close, she started picking up toys off the mat next to her, she could reach out for things in all directions, but the passing back and forth continued to elude her.
In April, it was my half birthday, and I treated myself to 10 packs of 151, a binder collection and a boosty bundy. I got some decent hits, I was happy, including 3 foil energies, steel, electric, & psychic, excellent combo if I do say so myself.
I know historically, these have been somewhat pricey cards, I've seen them around $5-15 for a single energy, but with the 151 set, they seem super common to me, I have like a dozen, so I just gave the foil energies to the baby for the lulz.
AND SHE WAS SO EXCITED!!! She loves them! And she immediately was holding them, picking them up, and yes, passing them between her hands just fine, with ease in fact. She loves them so much and I am just so fucking stoked that my love of Pokemon has helped my daughter's development in some way, she is going to be a true Pokemon master one day.
Thanks for reading, just wanted to share some positivity with the community.

It's something I've thought about countless times. for different reasons because I don't want to think about the actual reason because that would mean knowing I can't ever do something about it. even though I've already always known.
I was adopted when I was about 11 months old and it has been one of the things that I've never properly thought about even as a black kid in a white family, you would have thought I would, but I didn't. maybe it was because my AP has always been open about it, so it was never a shock even though it made me a little uncomfortable when people stared at me. I didn't get it at all, because I thought of myself as just a normal person. even though I was a pretty short kid, I thought I would grow taller and then they definitely wouldn't stare (it didn't happen, I'm still short) but that's not really why they were staring. I realized that when another kid in primary school asked me why I didn't look like my parents. I didn't understand what he meant because I had never thought that. I was slightly angry and just confused, why would he say that? I know I didn't look like them back then, but it felt like he was challenging me that I was their child. that I wasn't supposed to be there. I felt almost guilty, in a weird way (probably my insecurities) so I told him I was adopted. and laughed because I didn't want him to see I was bothered by it because I wasn't (I was).
It felt weird to be bothered by it or rather even the word ''adopted'' was something I did not like. as if often was followed by ''a blessing'', which did apply to me, I was blessed. for my loving family and siblings, and a better financial situation. That wasn't why I didn't like it, but the nagging feeling that I was once abandoned. a feeling that felt overlooked by me for early parts of my life, but felt. and it felt like I shouldn't have mentioned it since I was blessed. so I swallowed it since it was ''nothing''.
as I was 13 and becoming a teenager it felt different and exciting. starting a new school and a new beginning. That is what it felt like to me back then (which is very cliche.. teenage girl of me I know). though that was short-lived since I was pretty depressed. it was mostly because of being friends with the wrong people, but also that uncomfortable nagging feeling that something was wrong. or just no matter how many times I tried to figure out what it was, I couldn't. and it hurt so bad. but what could be wrong? I didn't get it.
I remember one night I was sitting with my mom and I don't remember how the topic came to it, but we talked about my adoption. we had never properly talked about it since I hadn't initiated it. she spoke of it, about how my mother left and how she also left my twin sister there.
this might sound weird, but at the mere mention, my heart dropped. because I didn't know that.
I knew my mother left at an orphanage of some sort, but the twin sister part genuinely screwed with something in me. and I remember zoning out for most of that conversation.
when I went back into my room, I wasn't sure what to think. I was uncomfortable, a feeling that felt like it had been building up for a long time. and I remembered I sat there and cried. for the first time, it felt like I was crying about the right thing that I hadn't allowed myself to think about.
I sat there, for a long time and wondered. what kind of life I would have lived there in contrast to my own now. and looking at myself in my mirror, at my own eyes that I've never been able to like for some reason. my eyes that I was given, the reason I can see the beautifulness of life and the ugly, and even my reflection. I wondered if my twin sister would have such eyes, or if I have eyes like my dad or my mom.
i remember i was hyper-focused on that. and started to even notice how my friends would complain about their parents and their features. the very features that made them look like their parents. it made me think of how i don't think i could ever get plastic surgery even if i don't like my appearance because i hope i can meet my parents one day. even though I'm pretty certain i never will. if they are even alive.
it felt kind of freeing to wonder, but heavy to know I'll never know. that I won't know their names, their passion, even how my parents first met, or even last. or maybe they were horrible people, or maybe they weren't. I like to think they aren't. though I won't know if I was even born out of love, hate, or perhaps necessity. That i might have just been an awful mistake, that ruined my mother's life. or even my twin sister's.
I left this out, but she died when she was about 20 days old. due to an illness she had (idk what its called), and she wasn't even buried properly. I feel so guilty, and sad that I can't even comprehend it.
I've always known I was adopted, but knowing I wasn't alone is something else entirely. but she is alone. and I can never let that go. I can't know how similar we would be or how different we would be. if she would be way better at sports than me (she would, I suck lol), and I wonder if she would be a nerd like me or pick on me because I am. I've never wanted to be picked on, this badly lol 😭😭
but my life didn't end after that night, or the countless other times I've thought and cried about this. I still manage to smile, which other people like a lot so I try to smile a lot. I think that means I must be doing okay. also since I can do my schoolwork and people are nice to me. and I even get compliments, which should make me happy but it doesn't.
as of now, I'm 16 and becoming older. and I don't know how I'm supposed to keep going with this. no matter how many times I cry about my biological parents or my twin or both, it doesn't go away. I'm not sure how I can ever live with this. I still cry a lot because of that (though I am a bit of a crybaby, so maybe it's that). I'm just not sure how I'm ever going to stop thinking about this or this guilt, that's just suffocating me. I try to have all of them in my heart so they will never be forgotten even if I never knew them, so they can live through me. but it's really hard.
(I've never talked about this or ever put it into words like this, but I thought I would try my best. and my English isn't the best so I'm sorry)

Orym, Dorian, and Chetney agreed that Otohan's blade deserved to go to Orym. As if there was clearly no better alternative than Orym wielding it or at least getting final say on what to do with it. And I don't totally agree. This has been bothering me for a couple days after rewatching the incident more carefully.
Above table, Orym is absolutely the best person to wield the blade and it would probably be a waste for no one to us it. His arguments that he doesn't have additional powers like the others is valid in character. Of course, mechanically, he was the only one consisently putting the hurt on Otohan in the last battle, too. Conflicting arguments there. In character though, I get why Orym would want it for all the reasons he stated in the episode.
For Dorian, while he's free to have an opinion and this is not a criticism of Dorian or Robbie, I don't think his thought on the matter should carry as much weight. He hadn't been there for any of the encounters with Otohan. He's clearly, and reasonably, biased towards Orym. Through no fault of his own, he just doesn't have the insight into the situation to make a proper call.
I had the biggest issue with Chetney. He said about Orym and the blade: "I agree it's his to do with as he pleases," and "He's lost more than we have." Laudna rightfully replies to Chetney not to talk to her about loss.
First, you don't compete over who has suffered more. Everyone's trauma is legitimate and you can't use a calculator to see who has "lost more."
Second, Laudna lost her life in a horrific way after being tortured, lost full autonomy of her body, full control of her will, and her home several times over. It's heavily implied she lost her whole family, too, after what the Briarwoods did in Whitestone. We could argue she even lost the basic right to die and move on naturally after Delilah brought her back the first time. If we were actually trying to calculate loss, I don't think Orym would win that anyway. The loss of his husband and father figure is truly awful, no denying that, but he still has a very loving home, community, mother, and sisters. Laudna doesn't have any of that. All she really has in the world are what she's carrying and who she is traveling with. Chetney absolutely deserved be told not to talk to her about loss. (I recognize Chetney has lost a fuckton, too, but in this case he was talking about how much Orym had lost.)
Overall, I lean towards what Ashton was feeling, as Talesin talked about in the Cool Down. And agree with some of what Laudna said, even though she was being manipulative when she said it. I'm hearing it like Ashton did, not knowing it's really Delilah twisting things: That blade killed four of them. FCG perma-died in the battle that led to them possessing it. Laudna almost permanently died, too, save for the crazy resurrection ritual. Watching Orym carry around such a blade would be a constant reminder of all that trauma. Even Imogen seemed to be agreeing with that. The shitty things Laudna/Delilah did and truly wanted in the face off don't change the legitimacy of the argument. It should not have been Orym's decision without any discussion, discounting the feelings of the others unfairly.

Went to GameStop a few days ago after buying my first ever PS5 because I wanted to buy a couple games to start out with. I grabbed Ark: Survival Ascended because I had played Survival Evolved on Xbox before I made the console switch. The thing is though, the employee told me it wasn’t out until next month and I could reserve a copy if I wanted. No big deal, cool. So I did that. Put $5 down to reserve a copy for release day. So I went home and got on the Playstation store and it pops right up when I’m looking at other stuff. HUHHHHHHHH???? What did she mean by it not being out??? Can you just not buy a physical copy yet? Confusion

Everyday I rediscover something I gave up for the "sake of Allah". Shit is depressing. But here are a few things ive been able to take back.
I'll start:-
.Music ((big one for me. Gym felt like hell because I constantly used to try my best not to bop to the songs🤣))
.Owning mangas (Dont have to throw out my small HxH collection anymore)
.Romance Movies/Tv shows
.Movies/Tv Shows/Games/Mangas that have gods or any kind of "Shirk". Also any kind og "satanic" themes.
.Movies/Tv Shows/Games/Mangas with magic and witches/wizards
.Halloween ((Fucking loved Halloween. It was depressing giving it up))
.Future occupations (Depressed I wasnt able to venture in any creative venture. I might become a possible video game developer tho)
.My sense of self and own ingrained morality. (Constantly embrassed and feeling like shit that my religion, community and prophet endorses and commited messed up things)
.My sexuality(I may not ever come out. However atleast I know there isnt a God who will try to put me in hell for fucking.
.My fucking sleep lmaoo. (Once I started taking my prayers seriously my sleep went to fucking shite. Does Allah seriously care about our health when he ordered this. Oh wait I forgot he wanted us to pray 50 times a day)
.Free Time (No more dumb duties)
.Free Mind (No more constant OCD for sinning/not praying in mosques, etc)
This is all I can think of right now. All I know is that I have a fuck ton of manga to catch up on lol. Starting with Death Note.

Two questions I understand going back to my home of record will be on me. But if you're single will they allow a delayed pack out? I understand and read in the guide this is common for married employees. I was not sure about single.
I currently live in a three bedroom house that I plan to either sell or rent out. I don't mind getting rid of things. However, will state pay to continue storing my belongings or bring my items to a storage center I can pay for when I am stateside. An example would be, let's say I get NYFO or some other very expensive first post for my first assignment I'll be lucky to rent a bedroom in an apartment so I wouldn't need most of my belongings, VS DC or Miami I can at least afford a 1 bedroom apartment. I would prefer to pack out after finding out my first assignment so I can sell items I won't need. However, if they will pay for storage then I don't mind packing everything before hand and figuring it out later. Some key large items I am thinking about as well are patio furniture, grill, riding lawn mower, spare bedroom set, 2nd couch.

I use my PC for primarily gaming and watching videos, and recently I’ve been having lots of FPS drops in games especially my favourite game Rust to the point it’s unplayable, so I’m wondering if this a hardware issue or is it something a-bit more technical
These are my current specs
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 3700 X Octa-core 3.6GHz/4.4GHz 36 MB cache
RAM: Corsair Vengeance 2x8G DDR4 3000MHz
GPU: AMD Radeon RX 5700XT 8G GDDR6
Storage: 2TB HDD (7200rpm) 256 GB SSD
Sorry if I’ve missed anything I should of wrote down like I say I don’t really know much.

I've been playing Forza Horizon 5 on Steam perfectly fine on my Envision Pro for the past few days.
Today I updated iCUE to version 5.14.93 (the update that rolled out on April 28, 2024) on Windows 10.
When I launched Forza Horizon 5, it recognized an Xbox controller was connected, but the buttons were glitchy, they weren't corresponding to what I was pressing. Pressing A at the title screen didn't get me past it like before. If I held down the A button, the on-screen button glyphs would rapidly flash between keyboard and Xbox buttons. Like "Space to continue" or "A to continue."
Things I've tried:
-Uninstalling iCUE, restarting my PC, reinstalling iCUE, then restarting my PC.
-Force reinstalling the latest controller firmware update in iCUE.
-Switching to on-board memory mode in iCUE, and resetting all 3 profiles back to their default.
-Deleting all custom iCUE controller profiles and using a fresh default one.
-Launching Forza Horizon 5 with iCUE running in the background and without.
-Launching Forza Horizon 5 with the Envision Pro in USB and wireless mode.
-Using a needle to hold the reset button on the controller for 5 seconds.
My guess is that this is due to a software bug or Xinput incompatibility with the latest version of iCUE. Since this only started happening when I updated it.
Halo: Infinite players in this thread also seem to be experiencing the same issue: https://www.reddit.com/CompetitiveHalo/comments/1chdz60/envision_pro_controller_not_recognized_afte
Here is another Forza player with the same issue: https://www.reddit.com/ForzaHorizon/comments/1co6sb6/controller_not_recognized/
When I tried Envision Pro with Alien Hominid HD, all the buttons behave like they should. So I'm guessing some games are using different versions of the Xinput API, and whatever Scuf changed in their latest iCUE update broke it.
The strange part is, there's about a 30% chance after restarting my PC that the Envision Pro works in Forza perfectly fine.
Before the iCUE update 5.14.93, this gamepad tester recognized the Envision Pro as an Xbox 360 controller: https://hardwaretester.com/gamepad
But after updating iCUE, that website no longer recognizes the controller at all.
I've tried uninstalling iCUE and using that gamepad tester, and it detected it as Scuf Envision Pro.
So I'm guessing whatever background process for iCUE that makes it use Xinput (even when the app isn't running) also got updated and broke with this update.
Has anyone found a solution to this? Or do we just have to wait for an update that fixes this?

I’m wanting to try out dungeons and dragons. I’ve seen videos on TikTok about it and it looks like an interesting game and a good way to build community. I’m 24f and LGBTQ, so I’d appreciate people who are accepting and understanding. I’m also a little slow with games. HOWEVER, I’m kind and enjoy meeting new people. My job is serious, my schooling is serious, so I’m looking to just have fun with new friends. :) I don’t have a preference for males or female groups (is that even a thing), just people who are friendly and respectful. Please comment or message me if you know of any or enjoy the game!

I'm not sure where else to ask this. I'm new to the game (just starting the second chapter (canto?)); but I personally am struggling a bit to get excited for the Gacha aspect of the game. Not because "ugh Gacha" or whatever, but simply I personally haven't noticed many units that click a lot with me visually.
I ended up pulling Sinclair's Dawn Office Fixer, and I quite like him visually and story wise (atleast what I saw when I got him to uptie 3). It seems to be someone trying to find hope and survive in the dark world, which I personally click with. Are there more like him? It doesn't even have to be exactly like that; I think the Liu Association characters I got are pretty neat too in that they seem to be a bunch of people who just like fighting and being happy as opposed to doing dark things, but I don't know their full story yet
I'm not saying anything bad about the game's art direction or anything; it's just I personally am more attracted to that visual feel of someone trying to cling to hope as opposed to something like a character getting transformed into a monster or using body parts as paint.
I'd just like to know if there's any characters I should be keeping an eye out as a newbie that could really help fit a theme similar to Dawn Sinclair. I wasn't sure where to look to find a list of all the characters without getting major spoils and the in game UI is still a bit confusing to me

So I've always wanted to see Iceland and Sigur Ros is one of my fav bands, so I decided to buy 2 tickets for their upcoming show in December. Well now I got the tickets, the only thing that's missing is you. Preferably I'd like to find someone and see if we click and then maybe we end up going to Iceland together. If this interests you, hit me up.
About me:
I'm a 42 years old, living with my dog in Philadelphia. I would like to meet some new people for chatting, friendship or maybe more depending on how things go.
When I am not going on adventures with my pup, I like going to concerts, from Childish Gambino to Sigur Ros (seeing them in December in Iceland!!). I love going to art museums and just walking around and appreciating everything or science museums and seeing some dinosaur bones or other cool stuff. I enjoy going out to eat and trying new restaurants. I am also a fan of traveling, was in France over the summer and now my total count is 11 countries and would love to check out some more. I enjoy watching movies and TV, playing video games(switch and series X), and some reading. I am also 420 friendly if that is something you are into.
I am a great +1 at weddings since I'm an amazing wedding dancer. With my patented moves such as the sprinkler or the bus driver. I am sure to impress or embarrass.
I am really good at bad jokes, or bad at good jokes? I know that they are bad, but I enjoy them anyway. Feel free to laugh or roll your eyes, or both. Your call.
Example: There are 2 fish in a tank, one looks at the other and says "how'd we get here?" the other one replies, "that's a great question, though a better one is who's driving this thing?"
Honestly I am just looking for someone to help me ride in the carpool lane or if that doesn't work, to spend time with, have stupid inside jokes, goof around on dreary days, keep me entertained at boring social events and all that fun stuff. Maybe you want those things too if so, feel free to hit me up if you wanna chat, can start there and see where it goes. And thanks for reading all of this.

Basically you can summon a net (imagine a fishing net) that can filter anything. You can summon a net of the size of a building and filter all the money in the building, that money will pass through walls and people. You can filter anything including emotions and thoughts. You can filter oddly specific things. The net can be the shape and size you desire. I feel that this power need a downside, let's say you can't filter yourself (imagine a perfect hitbox around you, you can't filter anything inside, this includes filtering past you, that is, you can't filter a building top down if you're inside, you'll need to stop before it reaches you), every time you filters something, doesn't matter how big or small it is, you feel slightly tired and this power consumes calories, nothing too big, lets say that if you filter the coffee on a mug you lose 1 cal, and if you filter the planet you lose 3k cal ( a logarithmic graph for those who care ).

Not necessarily looking to date someone from Reddit. Not NOT looking to date someone from Reddit. Mostly looking for the right guy who I have the right chemistry with to see where it leads us.
~
I am a[n]...

• avid reader, but not much of a TV or movie watcher.
• outdoorsy type who looks just as good in a dress as she does on the trail.
• extroverted, life-of-the-party type.
• aspiring artist.
• cat mom.
• neat freak.
• social drinker and sometime cannabis consumer.
• competitive soul, be it sports, board games, or a monthly reading challenge.
• single and actively dating.

You are...

• tall, handsome, and rich feat. a full head of hair. (I'm mostly joking – c'mon, I'm not that conceited...)
• gainfully employed with real, actual hobbies and interests.
• capable of holding up your end of a conversation.
• single.
• the kind of person whose good taste isn't ruined by your shitty attitude about it.
• not wholly inexperienced in life, love, or leisure.

I'm willing to chat about...

• anything deep, trivial, or intimate. You don't often get the ear of an anonymous stranger, so why not take advantage?
• hobbies (abandoned, emergent, whatever).
• our dating experiences – good, bad, ugly, and hot.
• something spicy if the chemistry's there.

I'm not willing to chat about...

• politics.
• your wife or girlfriend.
• you can probably fill in the rest of the blanks here.

If I seem like your thing, message or DM me!

The man took me to one empty space that was in everybody's view and then presented me with my full name and surname even tho I haven't told it to no one, not even to a person that informed me about all this cult, he told me to sit, observe and listen what they tell to me, then I saw how everyone was getting up and then I've done it with them, everyone that formed circle held hand, and that man was sipping some oil into that fire, which has resulted in it getting extremely tall, and then they begun reciting some shit in Latin, well some of the words they've said were incorrectly spoken but that's unimportant, even tho my skepticism faded away because I was starting to strongly believe in that with my own eyes.
Especially afterwards when I've heard "Bring the victim!" and then every single one of them pulled out their silver knifes out of some silky cloths and they used those knifes to make a cut in their arms so a little bit of blood would come out that they've poured into a small bowl, they also, of course, expected me to do the same, a worried me picked up a knife and placed it close to my arm, everyone else was watching me but I've managed to cut a little bit, blood began to mildly come out and I've placed the bowl under my arm. And then at that moment everyone just spontaneously went to the fire and began spilling those bowls of their blood on that big bowl of fire, when they finished that, they went to one side of the room in a queue, next to one big table, and then that man said, "Bring another victim!"
I heard the sound of the doors opening, at that moment I saw a young woman that was blindfolded and also had cloth covering her mouth while two burly men were taking her out. They placed her on a table and tied her with ropes, the rest of them took out their books that I've also received and began reading one page on Latin, while they were reading it and I was just pretending to, the man took out his knife and approached the tied girl, she was a blondie, also definitely younger than 20, the girl I've never seen in this city, the man pitilessly simply just dug in his giant knife in the spot in which heart is supposed to be in while tons of blood just started spilling out of her through the table on the satanic symbol that was drawn under it. I just couldn't believe that shit I was seeing with my own two eyes.
Their ritual was closely coming to an end, but, I didn't know one little minutiae about this cult, when they are attempting to summon a devil, the first victims blood is from the summoners themselves that love and extols him, the second victims blood must come from someone who's a virgin, and the third victims blood, well rather just say the third victim, must be, everyone, that was a suicidal cult.
When I realizes that, the participants were gathering around that table that had that dead girl laying on it, and they were all gifted with a glass of coffee that had poison in it, at the end that man also gave one to me, I grabbed it and just waited for what will be the next. I thought to myself that there's no way I am gonna try poison, but again, something was just convincing me to try it, just so I can see, if all of this is real, if someone like devil can really be summoned. Everyone took a glance at that giant cross on the wall that was backwards, crossed themselves also backwards while reciting the part of that Latin page they were reading, and then drank the poison, I also just moved the glass to my mouth and... drank it.
Shortly after I felt dizzy and collapsed on the floor like everyone else did, my sight was weaker and weaker, all until an ultimate darkness started to perform, and then, waking up. I woke up in a dark room, the room was dark, wet and utterly devoid of any sounds, and then in one moment, I heard thousands an thousand screams that were happening simultaneously, I started walking straight, until I spontaneously saw all those people that were with me in that factory, they all together stood there confused and full of questions when I approached them they turned to me and asked where the hell are we, I've replied "I obviously don't fucking know, this place is so weird and so creep-", then I mildly chuckled and revealed to them my face, my real face, humans, stupid little homunculuses, curious little humans, in fact so little that they are keep creating wars, hungers, problems, conflicts just so they could make themselves feel little important, humans with so much merit for intelligence and capacity but simultaneously so unbelievably stupid and limited, humans who act like they know so much about god and devil, me, but they didn't know, that I have an amazing and a little dark humour, that I love to have fun in this way, I love, my game.

I know a lot of people use kings hunting for example. Here is what I found
This is what Valmiki Ramayan says:
तस्मिन्निति सूखे काले धनुष्मानिषुमान रथी व्यायामकृतसंकल्प: सरयूमन्वगान्नदीम
' व्यायामकृतसंकल्प: ' means with the aim of exercise.
He says that it was a good day,hence i went to the banks of Sarayu River to do some exercise.
So one thing is clear,he was there to exercise,and not to hunt or kill any animal.
Now lets see what follows:
अथान्धकारेत्वश्रौष जले कुम्भस्य पूर्यत: अचक्षुर्विषये घोष वारणस्येवनर्दत:
It was dark at that time,i was not able to see clearly. Then i heard a voice of an animal,i thought its an elephant.
Now where is Hunting and Deer written here? Nowhere…its just TV serials show.
Kings used to catch and capture elephants for their army. Dashrath also wanted to capture that elephant,and he shot an arrow which by mistake hit Shravan Kumar. He had poisoned arrows which could make the elephant lose his senses,but it hit a human,who could not bear its poison.
This is what Ayodhyakand,Valmiki Ramayan says:
ततोअहम शरमुध्दत्य दीप्तमाशीविषोपमम शब्द प्रति गजप्रेप्सुरभिलक्ष्यमपातयम
तत्र वागुषसि व्यक्ता प्रादुरासीव्दनौकस: हां हेति पततस्तोये वाणाद्व्यथितमर्मण:
Dashrath says-”Then to get the elephant i shot a poisoned arrow.I heard a crying voice of a human from the direction in which i shot the arrow.”
So please start to read Valmiki Ramayan,don't waste your lives in lies and TV serials.
Thanks.
Next many people say that hinduism doesent allow or disallow meat.
Yes.
The Sanatana Dharma Teaches First That We should not Kill Animals Or Eat Any Type of Meat.
References -
Quotes that disapprove, even denounce, meat-eating
Rig Veda:
“One who partakes of human flesh, the flesh of a horse or of another animal, and deprives others of milk by slaughtering cows, O King, if such a fiend does not desist by other means, then you should not hesitate to cut off his head.”
Rig-veda (10.87.16)
Do the Vedic literature allow meat-eating? Did Hinduism adopt vegetarianism from Buddhism? - The Spiritual Scientist
Manu-Samhita:
“Meat can never be obtained without injury to living creatures, and injury to sentient beings is detrimental to the attainment of heavenly bliss; let him therefore shun the use of meat. Having well considered the disgusting origin of flesh and the cruelty of fettering and slaying corporeal beings, let him entirely abstain from eating flesh.”
(Manu-samhita 5.48-49) “He who permits the slaughter of an animal, he who cuts it up, he who kills it, he who buys or sells meat, he who cooks it, he who serves it up, and he who eats it, must all be considered as the slayers of the animal. There is no greater sinner than that man who though not worshiping the gods or the ancestors, seeks to increase the bulk of his own flesh by the flesh of other beings.” (Manu-samhita 5.51-52)
“If he has a strong desire (for meat) he may make an animal of clarified butter or one of flour (and eat that); but let him never seek to destroy an animal without a (lawful) reason. As many hairs as the slain beast has, so often indeed will he who killed it without a (lawful) reason suffer a violent death in future births.” (Manu-samhita 5.37-38)
“He who injures harmless creatures from a wish to give himself pleasure, never finds happiness in this life or the next.” (Manu-samhita 5.45)
“By subsisting on pure fruits and roots, and by eating food fit for ascetics in the forest, one does not gain so great a reward as by entirely avoiding the use of flesh. Me he [mam sah] will devour in the next world, whose flesh I eat in this life; the wise declare this to be the real meaning of the word ‘flesh’ [mam sah].” (Manu-samhita 5.54-55)
“He who does not seek to cause the sufferings of bonds and death to living creatures, (but) desires the good of all (beings), obtains endless bliss. He who does not injure any (creature) attains without an effort what he thinks of, what he undertakes, and what he fixes his mind on.” (Manu-samhita 5.46-47)
“By not killing any living being, one becomes fit for salvation.” (Manu-samhita 6.60)
Do the Vedic literature allow meat-eating? Did Hinduism adopt vegetarianism from Buddhism? - The Spiritual Scientist
Mahabharata

1. “He who desires to augment his own flesh by eating the flesh of other creatures, lives in misery in whatever species he may take his [next] birth.” (Mahabharata, Anu. 115.47)
   
2. “The purchaser of flesh performs violence by his wealth; he who eats flesh does so by enjoying its taste; the killer does violence by actually tying and killing the animal. Thus, there are three forms of killing. He who brings flesh or sends for it, he who cuts off the limbs of an animal, and he who purchases, sells, or cooks flesh and eats it–all these are to be considered meat-eaters.” (Mahabharata, Anu. 115.40)
   
3. “The sins generated by violence curtail the life of the perpetrator. Therefore, even those who are anxious for their own welfare should abstain from meat-eating.” (Mahabharata, Anu. 115.33)
   
4. Bhishma started, “Numberless discourses took place between the Rishis on this subject, O scion of Kuru’s race. Listen, O Yudhisthira, what their opinion was. (Mahabharata, Anu. 115.7)
   
5. “The highly wise seven celestial Rishis, the Valakshillyas, and those Rishis who drink the rays of the sun, all speak highly of abstention from meat.
   
6. The self-created Manu has said that the man who does not eat meat, or who does not kill living creatures, or who does not cause them to be killed, is a friend of all creatures. Such a man is incapable of being oppressed by any creature. He enjoys the confidence of all living beings. He always enjoys the praise of the pious. The virtuous Narada has said that that man who wishes to multiply his own flesh by eating the flesh of other creatures meets with disaster. (Mahabharata, Anu. 115.9-12)
   
7. “That man, who having eaten meat, gives it up afterwards wins merit by such a deed that is so great that a study of all the Vedas or a performance, O Bharata, of all the sacrifices [Vedic rituals], cannot give its like. (Mahabharata, Anu.115.16)
   
8. “That learned person who gives to all living creatures the gift of complete assurance is forsooth regarded as the giver of lifebreaths in this world. (Mahabharata, Anu. 115.18)
   
9. “Men gifted with intelligence and purified souls should always treat others as they themselves wish to be treated. It is seen that even those men who are endued with learning and who seek to acquire the greatest good in the shape of liberation, are not free of the fear of death. (Mahabharata, Anu. 115.20)
   
10. “What necessity be said of those innocent and healthy creatures gifted with love of life, when they are sought to be killed by sinful wretches living by slaughter? Therefore, O King, know that the discarding of meat is the highest refuge of religion, of the celestial region, and of happiness. Abstention of injury [to others] is the highest religion. It is, again, the highest penance. It is also the highest truth from which all duty emanates. (Mahabharata, Anu.115.21-23)
    
11. “Flesh cannot be had from grass or wood or stone. Unless a living creature is killed it cannot be procured. Hence is the fault of eating flesh. The celestials who live upon Svaha, Svadha, and nectar, are given to truth and sincerity. Those persons, however, who are for satisfying the sensation of taste, should be known as Rakshasas [flesh-eating demons] pervaded by the quality of Darkness. (Mahabharata, Anu.115.24-25)
    
12. “If there were nobody who ate flesh, then there would be nobody to slay living creatures. The man who slays living creatures kills them for the sake of the person who eats flesh. If flesh were not considered as food, there would then be no destruction of living creatures. It is for the sake of the eater that the destruction of living entities is carried on in the world. Since, O you of great splendor, the period of life is shortened by persons who kill living creatures or cause them to be killed, it is clear that the person who seeks his own good should give up meat altogether. Those dreadful persons who are engaged in the destruction of living beings never find protectors when they are in need. Such persons should always be molested and punished even as beast of prey. (Mahabharata, Anu.115.29-32)
    
13. “That man who seeks to multiply his own flesh by (eating) the flesh of others has to live in this world in great anxiety, and after death has to take birth in indifferent races and families. High Rishis given to the observance of vows and self-control have said that abstention from meat is worthy of praise, productive of fame and Heaven, and a great satisfaction itself. This I heard formerly, O son of Kunti, from Markandeya when that Rishi discoursed on the sins of eating flesh. (Mahabharata, Anu.115.34-36)
    
14. “He who purchases flesh, kills living creatures through his money. He who eats flesh, kills living beings through his eating. He who binds or seizes and actually kills living creatures is the slaughterer. These are the three sorts of slaughter through each of these acts. He who does not himself eat flesh but approves of an act of slaughter, becomes stained with the sin of slaughter. (Mahabharata, Anu.115.38-39)
    
15. “That wretched man who kills living creatures for the sake of those who would eat them commits great sin. The eater’s sin is not as great. That wretched man who, following the path of religious rites and sacrifices as laid down in the Vedas, would kill a living creature from a desire to eats its flesh, will certainly go to hell. That man who having eaten flesh abstains from it afterwards acquires great merit on account of such abstention from sin. He who arranges for obtaining flesh, he who approves of those arrangements, he who kills, he who buys or sells, he who cooks, and he who eats it, [acquire the sin of those who] are all considered as eaters of flesh. [Therefore] that man who wishes to avoid disaster should abstain from the meat of every living creature. (Mahabharata, Anu.115.44-48)
    

16 . “Listen to me, O king of kings, as I tell you this, O sinless one, there is absolute happiness in abstaining from meat, O king. He who practices severe austerities for a century, and he who abstains from meat, are both equally meritorious. This is my opinion. (Mahabharata, Anu.115.52-53)

1. “Yudhisthira said: Alas, those cruel men who, not caring for various other sorts of food, want only flesh, are really like great Rakshasas [meat-eating demons]. (Mahabharata, Anu.116.1)
   
2. “Bhishma said: That man who wishes to increase his own flesh by the meat of another living creature is such that there is none meaner and more cruel than he. In this world there is nothing that is dearer to a creature than his life. Hence, one should show mercy to the lives of others as he does to his own life. Forsooth, O son, flesh has its origin in the vital seed. There is great sin attached to its eating, as, indeed, there is merit in abstaining from it. (Mahabharata, Anu.116.11-13)
   
3. “There is nothing, O delighter of the Kurus, that is equal in point of merit, either in this world or in the next, to the practice of mercy to all living creatures. (Mahabharata, Anu.116.19)
   
4. “Hence a person of purified soul should be merciful to all living creatures. That man, O king, who abstains from every kind of meat from his birth forsooth, acquires a large space in the celestial region. They who eat the flesh of animals who are desirous of life, are themselves [later] eaten by the animals they eat. This is my opinion. Since he has eaten me, I shall eat him in return. This, O Bharata, forms the character as Mamsah [meaning flesh] of Mamsah [me he, or “me he” will eat for having eaten him]. The destroyer is always slain. After him the eater meets with the same fate. (Mahabharata, Anu.116.32-35)
   
5. “He who acts with hostility towards another becomes victim of similar deeds done by that other. Whatever acts one does in whatever bodies, he has to suffer the consequences thereof in those bodies. (Mahabharata, Anu.116.36-37)
   
6. “Abstention from cruelty is the highest Religion. Abstention from cruelty is the greatest self-restraint. Abstention from cruelty is the highest gift. Abstention from cruelty is the highest penance. Abstention from cruelty is the highest sacrifice. Abstention from cruelty is the highest power. Abstention from cruelty is the greatest friend. Abstention from cruelty is the greatest happiness. (Mahabharata, Anu.116.38-39)
   
7. “Gifts made in all sacrifices [rituals], ablutions performed in all sacred water, and the merit which one acquires from making all kinds of gifts mentioned in the scriptures, all these do not equal in merit abstention from cruelty.” (Mahabharata, Anu.116.40)
   

Do the Vedic literature allow meat-eating? Did Hinduism adopt vegetarianism from Buddhism? - The Spiritual Scientist
Bhagavata Purana:
“Those who are ignorant of real dharma and, though wicked and haughty, account themselves virtuous, kill animals without any feeling of remorse or fear of punishment. Further, in their next lives, such sinful persons will be eaten by the same creatures they have killed in this world.” (Bhagavata Purana 11.5.14)
The real purpose of a sacrifice was not to replace a slaughterhouse but to test a Vedic mantra by giving an animal new life. Animals were used to test the power of Vedic mantras, not for meat. - Srimad Bhagavatam 4.4.6 purport
Do the Vedic literature allow meat-eating? Did Hinduism adopt vegetarianism from Buddhism? - The Spiritual Scientist
Cow Sacrifice ? Not At All :
Besides References,Here’s What Supreme Lord Saying About Sacrifice -
CC Ādi 17.158 — As a learned scholar, the Kazi challenged Caitanya Mahāprabhu, “In Your Vedic scriptures there is an injunction for killing a cow. On the strength of this injunction, great sages performed sacrifices involving cow-killing.”
CC Ādi 17.159 — Refuting the Kazi’s statement, the Lord immediately replied, “The Vedas clearly enjoin that cows should not be killed. Therefore every Hindu, whoever he may be, avoids indulging in cow-killing.
CC Ādi 17.160 — “In the Vedas and Purāṇas there are injunctions declaring that if one can revive a living being, one can kill it for experimental purposes.
CC Ādi 17.161 — “Therefore the great sages sometimes killed old cows, and by chanting Vedic hymns they brought them back to life for perfection.
CC Ādi 17.162 — “The killing and rejuvenation of such old and invalid cows was not truly killing but an act of great benefit.
CC Ādi 17.163 — “Formerly there were powerful brāhmaṇas who could make such experiments using Vedic hymns, but now, because of the Kali-yuga, brāhmaṇas are not so powerful. Therefore the killing of cows and bulls for rejuvenation is forbidden.
—Ādi 17: The Pastimes of Lord Caitanya Mahāprabhu in His Youth
Srila Prabhupada Says - So killing, killing is very bad, but killing for the sake of right cause of fighting, or killing in the sacrifice, they are not sinful. Sometimes in the Vedas killing is recommended, just like in the fight or in the sacrifice, but that is not sinful. Sometimes a brāhmaṇa is sacrificing, offering, performing great sacrifice, and the animal is put into the fire just to give him renovated, new life, not for killing, just to test how Vedic mantras are being properly pronounced. That will be test. When sacrifice is done, the fire is there, and old animal is put into the sacrifice, and he comes out with a new body. That means the Vedic mantras are being pronounced very properly, and it is being carried out. This is the experiment, not for killing. Although in the Vedas there are recommendation that paśu-vadha system... Just like in the modern age also, when some experiment is made, it is made on the life of the animal. But they are killed. But when there is recommendation of putting an animal in the fire, that is not for killing; that is to see that this animal has got a new body.
Lecture on BG 2.14 -- London, August 20, 1973
Pradyumna: Aśvamedha-yajñas or gomedha-yajñas, or the sacrifices in which a horse or a bull is sacrificed, were not, of course, for the purpose of killing the animals. Lord Caitanya said that such animalssacrificed on the altar of yajña were rejuvenated and a new life was given to them. It was just to prove the efficacy of the hymns of the Vedas. By recitation of the hymns of the Vedas in the proper way, certainly the performer gets relief from the reactions of sins. But in case of such sacrifices not properly done under expert management, certainly one has to become responsible for animal sacrifice."
Prabhupāda: This is a long subject matter. But the sacrifice in yajña, recommended, that is not for killing the animal, but it is a testing, how the Vedic mantras are being properly chanted. Because an oldanimal put into the fire, by Vedic mantras he would come out again with young life. That is sacrifice of animals in the yajña. Therefore in this age there is no such expert brāhmaṇa who can chant the mantras properly or he can behave because the life is very abominable. Therefore, because there is no expert brāhmaṇa, so these sacrifices are forbidden in this age. Kalau pañca vivarjayet aśvamedhaṁ gavālambhaṁ devareṇa sutotpattiṁ sannyāsam (CC Adi 17.164). These things are forbidden in this age, because there is no proper men to conduct.
Lecture on SB 1.8.52 -- Los Angeles, May 14, 1973
The purpose of the Vedas is to establish such principles under the order of the Supreme Lord, and the Lord directly orders, at the end of the Gītā, that the highest principle of religion is to surrender unto Him only, and nothing more. The Vedic principles push one towards complete surrender unto Him; and whenever such principles are disturbed by the demoniac, the Lord appears. From the Bhāgavatam we understand that Lord Buddha is the incarnation of Kṛṣṇa who appeared when materialism was rampant and materialists were using the pretext of the authority of the Vedas. Although there are certain restrictive rules and regulations regarding animal sacrifice for particular purposes in the Vedas, people of demonic tendency still took to animal sacrifice without reference to the Vedic principles. Lord Buddha appeared to stop this nonsense and to establish the Vedic principles of nonviolence.
BG 4.7, Purport
Lord Buddha, a powerful incarnation of the Personality of Godhead, appeared in the province of Gayā (Bihar) as the son of Añjanā, and he preached his own conception of nonviolence and deprecated even the animal sacrifices sanctioned in the Vedas. At the time when Lord Buddha appeared, the people in general were atheistic and preferred animal flesh to anything else. On the plea of Vedic sacrifice, every place was practically turned into a slaughterhouse, and animal-killing was indulged in unrestrictedly. Lord Buddha preached nonviolence, taking pity on the poor animals. He preached that he did not believe in the tenets of the Vedas and stressed the adverse psychological effects incurred by animal-killing. Less intelligent men of the age of Kali, who had no faith in God, followed his principle, and for the time being they were trained in moral discipline and nonviolence, the preliminary steps for proceeding further on the path of God realization. He deluded the atheists because such atheists who followed his principles did not believe in God, but they kept their absolute faith in Lord Buddha, who himself was the incarnation of God. Thus the faithless people were made to believe in God in the form of Lord Buddha. That was the mercy of Lord Buddha: he made the faithless faithful to him.
SB 1.3.24, Purport
The horse sacrifice yajña or cow sacrifice yajña performed by the Vedic regulations shouldn't be misunderstood as a process of killing animals. On the contrary, animals offered for the yajña were rejuvenated to a new span of life by the transcendental power of chanting the Vedic hymns, which, if properly chanted, are different from what is understood by the common layman. The Veda-mantras are all practical, and the proof is rejuvenation of the sacrificed animal.
SB 1.12.34, Purport
According to sacrificial rituals, animals are sometimes sacrificed in the yajña arena. Such animals are sacrificed not to kill them but to give them new life. Such action was an experiment to observe whether the Vedic mantras were being properly pronounced. Sometimes small animals are killed in a medical laboratory to investigate therapeutic effects. In a medical clinic, the animals are not revived, but in the yajña arena, when animals were sacrificed, they were again given life by the potency of Vedic mantras. The word śipi-viṣṭāya appears in this verse. Śipi means "the flames of the sacrifice." In the sacrificial fire if the oblations are offered into the flames, then Lord Viṣṇu is situated there in the form of the flames. Therefore Lord Viṣṇu is known as Śipiviṣṭa.
SB 4.13.35, Purport
You can read more about the same:
Do the Vedic literature allow meat-eating? Did Hinduism adopt vegetarianism from Buddhism? - The Spiritual Scientist
Thank you.

Not sure the stance here but just needed to vent hope what I say isn’t too hated. Theres gotta be a better way to load content and a better way to see all content more efficiently
The app cannot remember where you are, if you spent 5 minutes scrolling past 200 episodes of something to get the middle or next episode, the app should know thats where you want to be.
I shouldnt start an hour long podcast, close my phone down to listen and then when I reopen the app to play the next one have to reload the page of the podcast, sort to oldest and then scroll for 4 minutes again, is it seriously that hard for the app to keep content loaded? Its embarrassing. It can’t remember loaded information from even a minute ago? Try it right now even if you play something and close it a minute later it still can’t remember where you were, it can remember where in the episode you were but trying to remember that you scrolled for a couple minutes and literally sat on an opened page seems to be an issue.
If it can’t keep content loaded for whatever reason, there isnt a better way to sort things? Give the creators playlists? Add a scroll by year function? There has to be something, Im able to look past some of the other bad UI problems but the app only being able to automatically load like 4 episodes of something is absolutely ridiculous, there’s anglefire websites that can hold and remember information better.