Currently building out the next big platform / product on base - Degen Day!
Degen.day
It’s an aggregator of all base eco launchpads (and soon to be adding wSOL token offerings from pumpfun, driving liquidity back into Base ecosystem).
We’ve just launched on May 16, and have been really keen on new user feedback + adding more token deployments on the platform!
The best feature updates will include:

• Lottery system (where wallets can win up to $20k USDC)
• Voice Chat (think of MW2 Days, slinging memes)
• stealth product partners with SocialFi (Farcaster)

A little bit more context on Degen Day:
Why Degen.Day?

• Pure Fun: Dive into the wildest, most ape-shit waves and enjoy every moment of it with a community of friends that thrive with on-chain spirit.
• Community: Engage with fellow degenerates, share laughs, and make the best memes on ThreadChats with trading away on degen alpha.
• Exclusive MeMeAlpha: Connect your wallet to access cookies, juice, and tunes…get started early, degen’ing all day, and receive MeMeAlpha as the platform grows.

https://preview.redd.it/252ltkdw0h1d1.png?width=1500&format=png&auto=webp&s=7cfdbf4ebcc4af4074a4d44443c74c232387caee
Key Features:

• Pump.Fun Degen.Day on EVM: Enjoy the thrill of the pump with less fees and more buyer protection. Get warnings on serial ruggers, hottest projects, and the
• king of memes to stay safe while you degen away, all day long.
• Windows 99 UI: Experience nostalgia with our fun, retro user interface.
• MeMeAlpha: Earn alpha for your degen activities and climb the ranks as you’ll receive some of the latest “alpha” for up & coming projects in the BASE eco.
• Leading Product Partnerships: Seamlessly integrate token threads with our stealth product partners, on some of your already favorite applications across Gaming, Gambling, and SocialFi.
• ThreadChat: Join 4chan thread-like chats for the ultimate lobby mayhem, spreading and creating chaos in the form of price predictions, meme evaluations, and honestly…anything you want to chat about!
• Sexy KOTH Feature: Our refined King of the Hill feature adds a competitive edge to creating the best meme trading software in the market. Earn what you eat, and become the best meme trader so you can receive bonuses as you climb the ladder.

Would love your feedback on the platform, so please let us know what you think!
For the next week (ending on March 26th at 12am ET) - we're giving free $10 USDC to every wallet address that deploys a new token offering!

• if your token get's to a MC of 4 ETH, we'll give you an additional $100 in USDC!

Again, requirements are:

1. Deploy a new token to Degen.day, receive $10 in USDC (free) within 24 hrs
2. If your token's marketcap reaches 4 eth, receive $100 USDC (free) to your address!

Have fun making degen plays, all day long!

Considering Unbounce vs. Webflow for your website needs? These two platforms offer distinct features catering to different user preferences. Unbounce focuses on creating high-converting landing pages with ease and lead generation, while Webflow provides a comprehensive design and development tool for building custom websites from scratch. Understanding the comparison between Unbounce's simplicity in landing page creation and Webflow's robust web design capabilities, as well as their intuitive interface, can help you choose the best fit for your project. Dive into this comparison to uncover which platform aligns better with your website goals and design preferences.
Useful Links:

1. Unbounce LifeTime Deal
2. Unbounce Free Trial

Key Takeaways

• When choosing between Unbounce and Webflow, consider your specific needs, goals, and landing page optimization to determine the best fit for your website.
• Evaluate the platforms based on their interface and ease of use to ensure smooth navigation and efficient workflow.
• Take into account the content management capabilities of both Unbounce and Webflow, driven websites, to determine which platform aligns better with your content creation and editing requirements.
• Compare the pricing structures of Unbounce and Webflow to select the platform that offers the most value for your budget.
• Explore the tools and resources provided by each platform to see which one offers the features and support that will benefit your website development process.
• Make an informed decision by weighing all these factors to choose the platform that best suits your website building needs.

Overview of Platforms

Core Focus

Unbounce primarily focuses on landing pages, offering a user-friendly platform for creating high-converting pages without the need for coding skills, catering to users and website design. On the other hand, Webflow is more versatile, serving as a comprehensive website design and development tool with various use cases for businesses and users.

Target Audience

Unbounce caters to marketers and small businesses looking to optimize their conversion rates through effective landing pages. In contrast, Webflow appeals to users, designers, and developers seeking full control over the design and functionality of their websites.
https://preview.redd.it/rzvvm5yf0h1d1.png?width=800&format=png&auto=webp&s=5f3832be3763e273a3e87c648acc1050df828ae5
Elevate your conversion game 🚀 Kickstart with Unbounce's Free Trial! 📊

Tools and Features

Unbounce provides a range of templates, A/B testing tools, and integrations with marketing platforms to enhance lead generation. Meanwhile, Webflow stands out with its robust CMS capabilities, allowing users to build dynamic websites with content management features.

• Unbounce offers a simplified drag-and-drop interface for quick page creation.
• Webflow provides advanced customization options with the ability to design responsive websites from scratch.

Interface and Ease of Use

Unbounce

Unbounce offers an intuitive interface that simplifies the website creation process. With its drag-and-drop functionality, users can easily design interactive websites without needing coding skills. The platform's focus on users' experience ensures a smooth workflow for creating landing pages.

Webflow

Webflow provides a more complex design environment compared to Unbounce. While it offers powerful design capabilities and flexibility, it requires a steeper learning curve due to its advanced features and functionalities. Users looking for more functionality and customization options might prefer Webflow for their projects.

Learning Curve

Unbounce is known for its simplicity, making it ideal for users who prioritize ease of use and quick setup. In contrast, Webflow caters to users who require more control over their designs but are willing to invest time in mastering the platform's features. The choice between Unbounce and Webflow often comes down to the user's preference for a straightforward interface versus a more intricate design tool.

Content Management Capabilities

Landing Pages Emphasis

Unbounce primarily focuses on landing pages, offering a simple yet effective platform for creating conversion-driven websites. Its page builder and editor streamline the process of landing page creation, ideal for marketers and small businesses.
On the other hand, Webflow stands out with its comprehensive content management system (CMS) capabilities. It goes beyond just landing pages, allowing users to create dynamic content and manage comprehensive website design effectively.

Website Management Scope

While Unbounce excels at creating high-converting landing pages, its limited CMS capabilities restrict users in terms of managing broader website content. In contrast, Webflow's robust CMS system enables users to handle various aspects of web design, from SEO optimization features to hosting and page templates.
Useful Links:

1. Unbounce LifeTime Deal
2. Unbounce Free Trial

SEO Optimization and Customization

With Unbounce, users might find themselves constrained when it comes to implementing advanced SEO strategies or customizing beyond landing pages. In comparison, Webflow provides extensive tools for SEO optimization, empowering web designers to enhance their websites' visibility and user experience effectively.

Pricing Comparison

Unbounce Pricing

Unbounce offers various pricing plans based on the number of landing pages and monthly conversions. Users can opt for plans starting from $80 per month for up to 500 conversions and 20 landing pages. The higher-tier plans, such as the Premium plan at $200 per month, cater to more extensive needs with unlimited landing pages and up to 30,000 conversions.

Webflow Pricing

Webflow's pricing model is structured around features, traffic volume, and hosting requirements. Their basic plan starts at $12 per month, providing essential features for small-scale websites. As the complexity and traffic volume increase, users can choose the CMS plan at $16 per month or the Business plan at $36 per month, offering advanced functionalities like site search and form submissions.

Comparing Pricing Strategies

When comparing Unbounce and Webflow's pricing strategies, Unbounce focuses more on conversion optimization by tailoring plans according to landing pages and conversions. On the other hand, Webflow emphasizes flexibility by offering different plans catering to varying website complexities and traffic volumes. While Unbounce provides a free trial to test their services, Webflow stands out with its ability to code websites directly within the platform.

Tools and Resources

Optimization Tools

Unbounce offers essential optimization tools like A/B testing and pop-ups, enabling businesses to enhance their marketing strategies effectively. These features help in analyzing the performance of campaigns and improving conversion rates.

Wide Range

Webflow boasts a diverse array of tools ranging from forms to e-commerce functionalities and animations. This platform caters to various needs, making it a versatile choice for businesses looking to create visually appealing websites with seamless functionality.

Unique Offerings

Unbounce stands out with its unique resources such as customizable templates and user-friendly interface, simplifying the process of creating landing pages. This makes it an ideal choice for startups and small businesses with specific development requirements.
Webflow, on the other hand, provides developers with advanced management features and extensive support for building complex websites. Its range of services caters to both beginners and experienced developers, offering flexibility in website creation.

Closing Thoughts

After comparing Unbounce and Webflow across various aspects, you now have a clearer picture of their strengths and weaknesses. Unbounce shines with its user-friendly interface and robust landing page capabilities, making it a top choice for marketers looking to optimize conversions quickly. On the other hand, Webflow's design flexibility and extensive customization options cater more to web designers seeking creative freedom in building websites.
As you weigh your options between Unbounce and Webflow, consider your specific needs and priorities. Whether you prioritize ease of use and conversion-focused features or value design control and customization, both platforms offer unique benefits. Take the time to assess which platform aligns best with your goals and resources to make an informed decision that will propel your online presence forward.
Step into boundless marketing success 🌟 Start your Unbounce Free Trial now! 🎉

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Unbounce or Webflow easier to use for beginners?

Unbounce offers a more straightforward interface tailored for marketers and designers with drag-and-drop functionality. Webflow, while powerful, has a steeper learning curve due to its advanced design capabilities and customization options.

Which platform is better for managing content efficiently?

Webflow provides robust content management capabilities with a visual editor and CMS features suitable for complex websites. Unbounce, on the other hand, focuses more on landing page creation and optimization rather than extensive content management.

How do Unbounce and Webflow compare in terms of pricing?

Unbounce offers tiered pricing based on traffic limits and features, starting at $80/month. Webflow's pricing is based on site plans, starting at $12/month for basic hosting but can increase significantly based on additional features and services.

What tools and resources are available for users of Unbounce and Webflow?

Unbounce provides A/B testing tools, conversion optimization resources, and integrations with various marketing platforms. Webflow offers a visual website builder, e-commerce tools, hosting services, and a community forum for support and learning resources.
Useful Links:

1. Unbounce LifeTime Deal
2. Unbounce Free Trial

I’m trying to recreate this top but it just looks off.. I started the center with 20 dc, then I did 2 dc in each stitch for the 2nd ring, then a row of single crochet to try and make it look more like the picture. But the pink row in the picture looks more like a treble crochet but idk… What I need the most help with is creating and connecting the petals!

1. Baku Fortress It was built in about 1138–1139 on the order of the Shirvanshah Manuchohr III (1120–1149)

2.The Round Mardakan Fortress or the Small Mardakan Castle( Perrsian: قلعه مردکان کوچک) The inscription (kitabe) on the castle's donjon says that it was built in 1232 by the architect Abdulmajid ibn Masud at the order of the Shirvanshah Fariburz III.
3.Keeper of the Fortress of Baku or Quadrangular Tower The tower was built in the 14th century and was an integral part of the fortress wall and the defensive fortifications in Baku.
4.Great Mardakan Castle or Quadrangular Mardakan Fortress The fortress was built in the shape of a quadrangle in the 12th century by Akhsitan I, the son of Shirvanshah Minuchihr III.

1. Maiden Tower Some scientific sources indicate that the Maiden Tower is a paramount example of Zoroastrianism and the pre-Islamic architecture in Iran and Azerbaijan. Davud A.Akhundov provides archeological and architectural evidences and argues that the Tower is Zoroastrians' Fire temple-Tower which had 7 fire exits on the top of the tower. Zoroastrian believed that there are 7 Steps or 7 Sky to reach heaven.

Davud A.Akhundov and Hassan Hassanov date the fire temple-tower approximately as 8th-7th century B.C.
Points out the marked difference in the stone used in the tower compared to the stone used in the medieval city surrounding it. This conclusion is partly supported by historian Bretanitskiy who has postulated that the tower was partly built in the 5th to 6th centuries and then later in the 12th century. The site was believed to have been used originally during the Sasanid era as a Zoroastrian temple. An inscription located 14 metres high on the south wall which in old Kufic script mentions Qubbeye Masud ibn Davud or Kubey Mesud ibn Da’ud, an architect active during the 12th century; he is the father of the architect who built the Mardakan Round Tower. However it is disputed as the inscription, unlike the Mardakan Tower inscription, does not actually reveal him to have been the architect, although it is generally agreed that much of the modern tower dates back to the 12th century. Ahmadov believes that the tower was used as an astronomical observatory from the time of this reconstruction, due to the fact that 30 hewed stone protuberances on the tower's lower section and the 31 protuberances on the upper section, linked with a stone belt, correlate to the days of the month.

1. Paired Fortress Gates or Gosha Gala Gapysy (also sometimes called Shamakhi gates) The old gate was built in the 12th century during the construction of the Baku fortress by order of Manuchehr III the Great, the new one - in the 17th century under Shah Abbas I by order of Zulfugar Khan.

7.Nardaran Fortress It was built in 1301 by architect Mahmud ibn Sa'd in the northern part of Absheron Peninsula. Nardaran Fortress is located 25 km north of Baku in the village of Nardaran near the town of Mashtaga. Shirvanshahs used the fortress for both observation and defense.
8.Ramana Tower The castle was possibly built under the order of the Shirvanshahs in the 14th century, perhaps for defensive purposes. Some researchers claim that the remaining structure was constructed during the Nizami period (12th century). Some historians have previously claimed the existence of underground passages connecting all the fortresses, generally leading to another castle, specifically the Baku castle, including the Maiden Tower.
9.Salyan Gates The Kempfers book describes that, in 1683, Icherisheher was surrounded by two fortress walls and had two city gates: Mountain (also called Gilan, Russian or Salyan) and Shamakhy (also called the Derbend Gates, the pair of fortress gates). Also, in the primary plan of the city of Baku, which was drawn up by the Russian army in 1723, two city gates were marked. The trade caravans arriving from Russia passed through the Shamakhy Gates and left through the Salyan Gates. The trade caravans arriving from Iran entered through the Salyan Gates and left through the Shamakhy Gates.
10.Shaghan Castle Itis one of the 12th - 13th century Absheron castles located in Shaghan settlement. As a result of a strong earthquake in 1841, most of the castle was destroyed. Currently, only one tower exists The fortress had a rectangular donjon, some of the ruins of which have survived to this day. The donjon consisted of three tiers; traces of machicolations were preserved on the donjon. According to the testimony of Sh. Fatullaev-Figarov, around the donjon there were also traces of fortress walls, which during his lifetime disappeared under new buildings
Source: Wikipedia

Considering Wrike vs. Airtable for your project management needs? These two platforms offer distinct features catering to different aspects of project organization and collaboration, details. While Wrike focuses on task management and team communication, Airtable stands out for its database-like functionalities, customizable workflows, and the ability to track details. Understanding the differences between Wrike and Airtable can help you choose the best fit for your specific project requirements, whether you prioritize task tracking or data organization. Let's delve into a detailed comparison of Wrike and Airtable to determine which platform aligns better with your project management preferences.
Useful Links:

1. Wrike LifeTime Deal
2. Wrike Free Trial

Key Takeaways

• Choose based on needs: Consider your specific requirements to decide between Wrike and Airtable effectively.
• Utilize trial periods: Take advantage of free trials to test both platforms and see which aligns best with your workflow.
• Feedback matters: Incorporate user reviews and feedback to understand real-world experiences and make an informed decision.
• Explore integrations: Evaluate the available integrations to ensure seamless connectivity with your existing tools.
• Cost-effectiveness is key: Compare pricing plans and features to determine the most cost-effective solution for your team.
• Customization is crucial: Assess the customization options to tailor the platform to your unique processes and preferences.

Overview of Wrike and Airtable

Core Focus

Wrike primarily focuses on project management, offering tools for task scheduling, progress tracking, and team collaboration. On the other hand, Airtable is renowned for its versatility in creating customizable databases that can be used for various purposes beyond project management.

Unique Selling Points

• Wrike: Known for its robust project planning features like Gantt charts and resource management tools.
• Airtable: Stands out with its flexibility in structuring data, combining spreadsheet-like functionality with database capabilities.

https://preview.redd.it/u4wpafgozg1d1.png?width=934&format=png&auto=webp&s=af9b261ea4bf1a259f475f1739781239c51d7a99
Smarter teamwork starts here! 🧠 Try Wrike free and see the difference it makes.

Target Audience

• Wrike: Ideal for teams or businesses looking for comprehensive project management solutions with advanced planning and collaboration features.
• Airtable: Appeals to users seeking a dynamic platform to organize and manage data in a visually appealing and customizable manner.

Key Features Compared

Customization Options

Wrike offers extensive customization features, allowing users to tailor workflows, fields, and dashboards to their specific needs. This flexibility ensures efficient task management based on individual project requirements. On the other hand, Airtable provides versatile customization options through its unique grid-database hybrid structure. Users can create custom views, fields, and relationships to organize data effectively.

Collaboration Tools

Both Wrike and Airtable excel in providing robust collaboration tools for teams. Wrike's platform facilitates seamless communication through real-time updates, comments, and mentions within tasks. It offers task dependencies and Gantt charts, enhancing project planning and execution. In comparison, Airtable's collaboration features include shared views, commenting, and attachments within the database. This fosters team coordination by centralizing all project-related information.

Comparison Overview:

• Customization Options:
  • Wrike: Extensive workflow customization.
  • Airtable: Versatile grid-database hybrid structure.
• Collaboration Tools:
  • Wrike: Real-time updates and task dependencies.
  • Airtable: Shared views and centralized information.

Use Cases and Flexibility

Workflows

Wrike stands out for its versatile workflows, streamlining processes for teams across various industries. With customizable templates, it helps in managing complex projects efficiently.

Help Resources

Airtable offers extensive help resources to guide users through its flexible database management system. Its user-friendly interface makes it easy for beginners to navigate.
Useful Links:

1. Wrike LifeTime Deal
2. Wrike Free Trial

Remote Teams

For remote teams, Wrike provides a centralized platform for collaboration, ensuring seamless communication and task tracking. It enhances productivity even when team members are geographically dispersed.

Diverse Project Management Needs

Both Wrike and Airtable cater to diverse project management needs by offering unique features. While Wrike focuses on structured project planning, Airtable provides flexibility with its adaptable databases.

• Pros of Wrike:
  • Structured workflows
  • Centralized collaboration platform
• Pros of Airtable:
  • Flexible database management
  • Extensive help resources available

Pricing and Integrations

Pricing

Wrike:

• Wrike offers various pricing plans, including Free, Professional, Business, and Enterprise.
• The Free plan allows up to 5 users with basic features, while the Enterprise plan caters to large organizations with advanced functionalities.

Airtable:

• Airtable also provides a Free plan for basic use and paid plans like Plus, Pro, and Enterprise.
• Each paid plan of Airtable offers additional features such as advanced blocks and priority support.

Integrations

Wrike:

• Wrike integrates seamlessly with popular tools like Slack, Microsoft Teams, Google Drive, and Salesforce.
• This integration capability enhances collaboration and workflow efficiency for teams using Wrike.

Airtable:

• Airtable supports integrations with applications like Zapier, Slack, Gmail, and Trello.
• These integrations enable users to connect Airtable with other tools they commonly use for a smoother workflow experience.

Value for Money

Wrike:

• Wrike provides a comprehensive project management solution suitable for teams of all sizes.
• With its diverse pricing options and robust integrations, Wrike offers value for money by catering to different organizational needs effectively.

Airtable:

• Airtable stands out with its flexible database capabilities that can be customized for various purposes.
• While Airtable may have a steeper learning curve for some users, its versatility in managing data makes it a valuable investment for those seeking a dynamic platform.

User Reviews and Feedback

Wrike's Usability

Users across various industries have lauded Wrike for its intuitive interface and seamless navigation. The platform's ability to streamline project management tasks has received praise from many users. The customizable dashboards and reporting features have been highlighted as beneficial for tracking progress.

Airtable's Visual Appeal

Many people have commended Airtable for its visually appealing design, making data organization and collaboration more engaging. The platform's flexibility in creating customized databases has resonated well with users, particularly those in creative fields.

Drawbacks of Wrike and Airtable

Wrike

• Some users have expressed frustration over the complexity of setting up advanced workflows.
• Limited customization options for task views have been a common concern raised by users.

Airtable

• While praised for its visual appeal, some users find the learning curve steep due to the platform's extensive features.
• Integration limitations with other tools have been cited as a drawback by certain users.

Summary

You've now seen a detailed comparison between Wrike and Airtable, exploring their features, use cases, pricing, integrations, and user feedback. Both tools offer unique strengths tailored to different needs. Wrike excels in project management with its robust features, while Airtable provides flexibility for various data organization tasks. Your choice should align with your specific requirements and preferences.
As you consider which tool suits you best, remember to prioritize what features are essential for your projects. Whether it's detailed project tracking or versatile data organization, both Wrike and Airtable have something valuable to offer. Take the time to evaluate your needs and test out both platforms if possible before making a decision. Your productivity and project success depend on selecting the tool that aligns best with your workflow.
Smarter teamwork starts here! 🧠 Try Wrike free and see the difference it makes.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main difference between Wrike and Airtable?

Wrike focuses on project management with features like Gantt charts and resource management, while Airtable is a flexible database tool for organizing information in a spreadsheet-like interface.

Which key features set Wrike apart from Airtable?

Wrike offers advanced project planning tools, real-time collaboration features, and customizable workflows. In contrast, Airtable excels in data organization, linking records across tables, and visualizing data with different views.

How can businesses benefit from using Wrike over Airtable?

Businesses benefit from Wrike's robust project management capabilities for planning, tracking progress, and managing resources efficiently. It enhances team collaboration, streamlines workflows, and ensures projects are completed on time.

In what scenarios would businesses prefer using Airtable instead of Wrike?

Businesses opt for Airtable when they need a versatile tool for organizing data, tracking information across multiple categories or departments, creating custom databases without coding knowledge, and visualizing data creatively through various views.

Are there notable differences in pricing between Wrike and Airtable?

Wrike offers tiered pricing based on the number of users and features required by the business. On the other hand, Airtable provides different pricing plans based on storage needs and advanced features like automations and user permissions.
Useful Links:

1. Wrike LifeTime Deal
2. Wrike Free Trial