2024.06.01 11:07 Harry_is_white_hot The USS Curtiss USO incident: that time the U.S. Navy ship delivering the hydrogen bomb for the Castle Bravo test was shadowed by an Unidentified Submarine Object in the middle of the Pacific Ocean.
Inspired by Rear Admiral Tim Gallaudet’s (Ret.) recent discussions on USOs, I thought I would relate the following. Just over 70 years ago, an interesting incident occurred on board the USS Curtis – the U.S. Navy vessel tasked with delivery of the Shrimp device to the Pacific Proving Ground in 1954 for the notorious Castle Bravo nuclear weapons test. This particular test, which scientists from Los Alamos and Lawrence Livermore laboratories had calculated to have a yield of 4,8 megatons actually went far above this calculation to achieve nearly 16 megatons of TNT equivalent yield. This miscalculation exposed many U.S. military personnel to dangerous levels of radiation and, more importantly, post traumatic stress disorder from being exposed to the close-range effects of such a large blast. Was the USO incident related to the yield miscalculation event? submitted by Harry_is_white_hot to UFOB [link] [comments] USS Curtiss (AV-4) The Curtiss class were the first seaplane tenders built from the keel up for the US Navy, the previous tenders had been converted from cargo ships. They were designed to provide command facilities for forward operating long-range patrol seaplane squadrons. To accomplish this, they were heavily armed with four 5-inch (130 mm)/38 caliber dual-purpose guns, and contained repair and maintenance facilities, along with supplies for operating in forward areas for many months. The ships had a large seaplane deck located at the stern with the maintenance shops located in the superstructure just forward of it. They were built with three large cranes, one located at the starboard extreme of the stern, the second was at the aft of the superstructure on the port side, with the remaining crane located midship on the starboard side. The starboard crane at midship was removed from both ships during WWII and replaced with a 20-millimeter (0.79 in) Oerlikon cannon gun tub. Two of the 5-in guns were staggered on opposite sides of the rear superstructure, with the remaining two in a superfiring configuration at the bow of the ships. From 23 February to 13 June 1951, Curtiss served as flagship for "Operation Greenhouse" and was the base for civilian and military technicians during the atomic tests at Eniwetok. She also provided meteorological information and operated a boat pool. Curtiss served at San Diego, in local operations until 29 September 1952, when she again sailed to Eniwetok, as flagship during the atomic tests of "Operation Ivy", during which the first hydrogen bomb was detonated. Returning to San Diego, on 4 December, she cruised the west coast, and visited Acapulco, Mexico, in 1953. From 10 January to 28 May 1954, she participated in "Operation Castle". Rather than write about the USO event, I will post verbatim the eyewitness accounts of two U.S. Marines onboard the USS Curtiss – Robert Mackenzie and G. Nicholas Stuparich. First, a little background from Mackenzie and Stuparich regarding their duties on the Curtiss: Mackenzie: So all the guys that got a clearance, we went as a group on the Curtiss. Now we knew where it was going but we really didn’t know what we were going to do. Interviewer : OK, so after the fact, at some point you know that you’ve gotten a clearance. Mackenzie: We didn’t know that until we were already halfway on the cruise. And the way we found out is that some of the men were called in and they were told they didn’t get a Queen Clearance. They got top secret but they didn’t get Queen. And it was no fault of theirs, Mary. Some of them, if they had one relative that was born in another country and something, they just couldn’t get one. Interviewer: Correct. Correct. So “Q” stands for “Queen.” Yes. Or is “Queen” something you make from “Q”? I wonder. I’ve never— Mackenzie: Well, “Q” must be “Queen,” I guess. Yes. It must be. Interviewer: You guys said “Queen,” though, when you said clearance. Mackenzie: Yes. Yes. And it’s a Queen Clearance, yes. And they’re still around, I understand. . Mackenzie: And I tell you why, is that when I went aboard ship, they made me an orderly, which was a great honor. And so I was the admiral’s orderly, and before that I was the captain’s orderly. In fact, by the time I was aboard the Curtiss for eighteen months, I worked as an orderly for three admirals and two ship’s captains and the executive officer, which was a great background for a young man. And I have the highest regard for naval officers. I watched them talk to their men, I watched them talk to their fellow officers, I saw how they solved problems, and just what a great example for a young man, to be around people of that caliber. It was wonderful. Interviewer: Let me ask you a question here because I don’t know that much about the armed forces. The Curtiss is obviously a Navy ship. Mackenzie: Yes. Interviewer: And you’re a Marine serving on it. Is that common? Mackenzie: No. It’s only in capital ships, normally, which would be battleships— Interviewer: “Capital ships.” Mackenzie: Capital ships, which would be—the terminology has changed today, Mary, but in my day it was battleships, cruisers, heavy cruisers, light cruisers, aircraft carriers, would have Marine detachments. Now originally the Marine detachments were almost the police force of the ship. And they were called MAs, which would be Master-of-Arms. Very unpopular with the Navy. And the brig is, of course, run by the Marines. But on our ship, we didn’t have those duties, not on the Curtiss. The Curtiss, we were a special force with top secret clearances. People only didn’t talk to us because they would say, Hey, you don’t talk to those guys. It was that kind of thing. So anyway, but we ended up being very close with the Navy, but our duties, we didn’t talk to each other about our duties. Stuparich: So, I remember signing the clearance papers and they didn’t tell us what we were going to do or where we were going. We went aboard ship as supposedly just a Marine detachment, but then it ended up being as nuclear security. We were well briefed and well trained on what our jobs were aboard ship. I did security with the devices, once they were delivered to the vessel. We did perimeter security when the devices were being delivered, which meant we were out on the pier and out in the area when the trucks arrived, delivering units. Once the canisters were brought aboard, then we were assigned to security aboard the ship, which meant working in the hole. In other words, the devices were put in a particular compartment. We were responsible for the security of that department, the corridor that led to it, and I can’t remember if we were reading the temperature. We had to take a reading, I believe, once an hour and record it. I do not remember whether it was temperature or radiation, but it had to be recorded; I remember that if there was something wrong, and I don’t know the standard, but if it went over that standard or under that standard, we had to notify the science officer, who was also the engineering officer. That was Commander Hart, I believe. Interviewer: Now, let me back up just a tiny bit with the security piece. So there’s a point at which you’re informed, I assume after you’re cleared, of what your mission actually is? Stuparich: Correct. Interviewer: Give me a sense of how much detail they give you there, and how much that is connected to what you already might know about nuclear weapons. Stuparich: That’s a little bit confusing because I know so much more now than I did then. I do not believe they gave us that much information. They definitely didn’t give us a detailed description of our duties, other than that what we were doing was actually guarding a nuclear device, and that’s all they would say. We and I think about a half-a-dozen sailors were the only ones that actually saw the canisters being brought aboard. There were not very many people. That was secured. The whole aft deck was secured when that occurred. Interviewer: And how many of there were you, when you say “we”? Stuparich: There were probably six Marines on the dock, one or two on the trucks, then I think there were a couple in the different corridors—what they did was they dogged the hatches so people couldn’t come in when we were loading this particular material. Then it went down into the hole and then there was a special rack because the canisters had to be triced up in these racks. I can’t remember whether there was—I think there were six to a rack. And they were triced up like you would trice up nitroglycerine, you know, with like Bungee cords but I think they were springs. Interviewer: Say that word again. I don’t know that word “trice.” Stuparich: Tricing means to tie, and what it does is it keeps something in balance so that if it’s hanging, it’s free-hanging, but it’s in a rack, and this keeps the canister in line, and it’s called trice, you trice it up. Interviewer: “Trice it up.” I see. Stuparich: We didn’t do that. That was done by their people. Stuparich: We embarked out of San Diego, went up to San Francisco. That’s it. We went to San Francisco, went to Hunters Point for something, some sort of refurbishing. Then from Hunters Point we went over to Port Chicago, picked up our merchandise, if you will, and then when we were through with that, when we pulled out, we went down and then into the bay. At that time we picked up some escorts, and then we went under the Golden Gate Bridge, at which time the Secret Service or FBI, whoever they were, had the bridge closed, and they were waving at us as we went underneath. Interviewer: Wow, they closed the bridge. Stuparich: They closed the Golden Gate Bridge. It was kind of cool because being from the Bay Area I kind of remembered that. I think I was aft at the time and I was looking up and yeah, sure enough, they did. And that was kind of interesting. So then we headed out to the Pacific. I think we refueled and resupplied once or twice, a ship came alongside, I think they came out of Hawaii. They used the high line and brought the stuff across, and then they brought the refueler up and then they refueled us. And that’s why they call us the Ghost Ship, because almost everything that we did, the replenishing and the refueling, was all done at sea. Now, the USO incident – which many people denied having happened. The "Russian sub" somehow penetrated the flotilla protecting the Curtiss and was completely undetected until it appeared underneath the Curtiss. This event occurred a full 6 years before the Soviet's first nuclear submarine set sail - so for a diesel powered submarine in the middle of the Pacific without logistic support this feat would have been incredibly difficult to accomplish. Stuparich Account: Stuparich : The other thing that really upset me was the submarine. Interviewer: Yes, talk to me about that a little bit. Stuparich : Well, Robert Mackenzie was the admiral’s orderly that night, and I was the orderly on the next deck down, and my job was to protect the crypto room which was, if you were looking down the hall, was to the left, and then the CIC which was straight ahead. Interviewer: CIC is? Stuparich : Is Central Intelligence Control or something like that. It’s an area where they plot everything. [Note: on board U.S. Navy ships, the CIC is the Combat Information Center] Anyway, I was standing there and all of a sudden Commander Hart came running around the corner and said, “Come with me”, with that I was on alert. So we went into CIC and then there was—I stood at the door. He said, “Block the door”, and I blocked the door. And it was one of those combination doors in those days. And I saw him talking with an officer, with the officer in command of the CIC at the time, or duty officer, I guess is what you call him, and then they were really—I could tell they were really stressed about something. Then a chief electronics mate had taken the young man off of the board and they were looking at the board and plotting on the board something, and he got on the phone to the bridge. I immediately felt the ship changing course, and we immediately started into a zigzag situation. And then I could tell, this man was stressed, and I’d never seen him stressed like that before. This way, that way. Everything was very staccato. So went back up to the bridge and Mackenzie and the Admiral were already there. And as a young man, you’re looking at their body language and their facial features and we knew that there was something wrong. Well then, I heard the conversation, and they wanted to know, in profanity, how the son-of-a-b*tch got there. How did it get there? How did it get through the perimeter? So then they were communicating with the vessels that were on the perimeter, there were destroyers out there and everything else, and they couldn’t figure it out. Admiral Wellings said, I believe that’s he’s probably been sitting here waiting for us. He probably plotted our course and just dropped to the bottom and waited till we came by, and then he came up underneath us. And he just followed us, and it was just a Russian sub, is what we anticipated. And they figured that they knew it was a Russian sub. Yeah. And it did. It stayed with us. And then what really became scary is that I remember the admiral telling the captain, We don’t have to worry if he’s directly under us. If he drops back into firing range, then we have to worry. By then, the other ships were doing crisscrosses in front and in back of us. These are the little destroyers. And sure enough, he did, he dropped back, I don’t know how far, I remember they had it plotted, and he was within firing range. And so then I just, I don’t know, something really bothered me and really happened to me mentally, because I just said [to myself], this whole thing’s over now, we’re through, we’re done with. And I guess I kind of convinced myself that that was going to happen. Interviewer: And this is prior to arriving in the Pacific. Stuparich: Yeah, we were on our way. Interviewer: So, just to get a sense of it, you’re well aware of what you’ve got on board? Stuparich : Oh yeah, because I’d already been down in the hole and they’d told us what it was. Yeah, and then you’ve got a— Got this sub, and believe it or not, not very many people knew about it. I mean surprisingly, people were telling Bob [Robert W. Mackenzie] he was crazy. You don’t know what you’re talking about. There was no submarine. Well, I know there was. And when I mentioned it to Bob last year he said, Thank God somebody else knows. And what we’re trying to do is find a third Marine who was on the bridge, but there may not have been a Marine on the bridge. Mackenzie account: Interviewer: So explain to me how much you knew about the mission or what you thought or what’s that like? Mackenzie : We didn’t know anything about it, frankly. You know, I realized that it was more than just a mission. Now by that time, Mary, the Korean War was over with. We were steaming out in ’54? Yes, January of ’54 is when we left San Diego. And Korea had been over for about six months, but the Cold War was extremely hot then. And when I first realized that there was more going on than we realized is when we had full wartime conditions on the ship. And I’d thought, Well, what are we doing here? The ship’s all blacked out at night. We’ve got all these red lights on you see in the movies, like those submarine movies, everybody running and all those red lights on at night. And heavy, heavy drapes in front of every hatch. And you don’t go outside, or as they say, out on the decks without closing that, and then you open the hatch and a red light comes on, then you close the hatch. And they were conscious of sound, of lights. And I said, What’s going on here? You know. And so when I really realized there was more going on is when I was on orderly duty for the admiral. And I was on duty and on duty and on duty and I just couldn’t stand up anymore. So I called somebody in the Marine detachment and said, Well, when is my relief going to be here? It was real late at night, it was like eleven or twelve o’clock, I’d gone on that morning at 6:30, and I’d been standing all day long. That’s what you do. And I just got so I couldn’t stand anymore. So I called down and I was told that the admiral only wanted me and there would be no relief, So just stick it out, Mackenzie. I wasn’t real happy about that. But anyway, so—and I’ll put this right on tape—so a Marine never sits down on duty, but I did. I couldn’t stand up anymore. So I found a chair in an empty officer’s stateroom and I wedged that chair in a real narrow hallway that went into the admiral’s quarters, and I put my feet against the bulkhead and I rocked back and I just kind of rocked with the ship. At least I was off my feet, and I figured nobody could get by me. So I guess, I don’t know if I dozed off or what, but all I know is this sailor was shaking my arm. It was about 2:30, three o’clock in the morning. And he says, “Wake up the admiral! Wake up the admiral!” And I said,”Well, who are you? What do you mean, wake up the admiral? It’s three o’clock in the morning.” [And he said], “Oh, they want him on the bridge right now”. And I said, “Who wants him on the bridge?” [And he said], “Well, the officers, blah, blah, and all that”. I said, “Well, what is your name?” And he gave me his name, and I said, “What’s the officer’s name?” I really realized we were very, very conscious and were trained to be suspicious of everything. I don’t know who this guy is. He wants to go in and see the admiral? That’s my job. Nobody goes in to see the admiral. And so anyway I said, “Well, I’ll go wake up the admiral and you go back and report to the bridge, and I’m sure the admiral will be right there”. I didn’t want him to go in with me. And so anyway, he left. So now I’m saying, How do you wake up an admiral? You know. I wanted to do it maybe like I was back in back in boot camp and scream, say, “Hit the deck”! I says, well, no, I didn’t want to go to the brig, so I didn’t do that. So anyway I said, Well, how do you wake up an admiral? So anyway, I woke him up. And I remember he said, “What is it, Mackenzie?” And he was startled. And I said, “Sir, the admiral’s presence is requested on the bridge immediately”. You don’t want to say “immediately” to an admiral, but I did. Anyway, he looked at me, and he had a phone right next to his bunk. And I always wondered, if he had phone, why didn’t they just call him? I don’t know. You know, you would wonder. And so anyway, he picked up his phone. And like I said, the respect from the naval officers, they’re just really something, Mary, they really are. And so he went up on the deck with his blue terrycloth bathrobe on. Interviewer: He picks up the phone and confirms? Mackenzie: Right. And then he puts on his blue bathrobe— He doesn’t even get dressed. Oh no. They want him right now [sound of fingers snapping]. So I thought, Whoo, something’s going on. So I go up there, and it was like an old World War II movie. At my age, I grew up with those World War II movies, you know. And on the bridge, all the lights are out because we’re running at wartime conditions at night, and you can just see the shadows, you know, and those were from the glowing of the instruments and the people moving around the bridge and all that. And right away, the officer in charge of the bridge came up, and everybody was whispering. I thought, What is all this whispering about? You know. And he was talking to the admiral. And that’s part of the job of being an orderly. You’re there but you don’t get too close because if you do— Interviewer: You’ll hear? Mackenzie: You don’t want to hear. And the admirals will let you know, and so will the captains. If you’re a little too close to them, they’ll give you one of those, turn their head around, you kind of back up. You realize you’re a little too close. They want to be guarded. They don’t want anybody to get them. That’s your job is to protect them, help them in any way you can, so forth. But anyway, and you’ll kind of back up. But I wanted to hear what was going on, you know. So then all I heard was “submarine.” I thought, Well, so what? You know. But anyway, it turns out that we were being shadowed by a Russian sub. Interviewer: For real? Mackenzie: For real. And the sub was directly under us [slaps hands together] like this. And they picked it up. Because I thought, well, how did it get through our screen? We were in a complete convoy, and we had carriers, we had destroyers, we had everything. And I thought, How did this guy get through all that? And they tell me what they do is they know where you’re going. They just sit down at the bottom and wait till you get there and just [slapping hands together] pop up. They don’t have to go through any screens. And I said, Oh. Interviewer: Oh. So they know from – Mackenzie: Sure, they know. Yes. They probably knew, with all the spies and all that. But anyway, the admiral asked several questions, and I guess before, he asked them if they had contact with somebody. And they said,”No, sir, we thought we’d wait for the admiral”, and all that. And he said, “Well, you should’ve. Did you contact anybody to tell them what the situation was? How have you tried to contact the sub?” Evidently they have an international language they use. Then of course they used Russian and they used everything, and no response. And so I always was kidding Kari because this was dramatic, you know. I always said, Whooo, thirty seconds from World War III. Well, that’s the way you think of it later, but it’s very true. But the thing that I still remember today is when the admiral walked on the bridge, you get almost like this, your daddy had come home to save you or something. That man had a presence about him. He wasn’t tall in stature. And his name was [RADM H.C.] Bruton. I’m sure he’s gone now. But he walked on that bridge and all of a sudden, you could just—everybody, like, The admiral’s here, we’re going to be all right. You know. And you could feel that. And he asked just a few questions. And the sub, and they were waiting for the reply to come back, Do we take action? Do we take evasive action? Now it’s pretty hard to blow up a submarine when it’s right under you. What do you do, when you think about it? How do you get a sub from under us? But we had submarines with us, too, our subs. And so it came back, they were waiting for the reply to come back, and I thought, My God, this is more serious than I realized. You know, it was kind of like a game until then, you know, it was just wartime conditions. I mean we didn’t think anything about this kind of stuff. And so we knew security was extremely tight. Only certain people could go by us, then go into certain compartments, and I’ll tell you about that in a minute. But anyway, back to the sub. And so it broke away. And you know you say “broke away,” where’d it go? It just broke away. And the admiral, they said—sonar reported or whatever and said, The sub has broken away. They must’ve known how many seconds they had. Later I saw a Tom Clancy movie about that, where they were checking and there were seconds and all, and I said, My golly, I saw the same thing in 1954, except for real, you know. So they said it broke away, and the admiral just calm as could be and he says, Carry on, men, you did a good job. If you need me, call, and he went back and went to bed. And I said [to myself], My gosh, it was almost—it was like nothing to him. He was so in command, just knew what he was doing, asked the right questions, congratulated everybody for the job they did, and went back to bed. Now I’m wide awake. I didn’t sit down anymore for the rest of the night. But I never told any of the guys about it. I just told that guy, one of our fellow Marines, November the tenth. It was the Marine Corps birthday. We all got together here at Dana Point. And I told him the submarine story and he says, “What submarine?” I said, “The submarine”. He said,” Well, I didn’t know anything about any submarine.” And I remembered, I’d thought about it, “Well, why should I worry the guys?” And not only that, if something happened when I was on orderly duty, you don’t pass that around the ship. That’s a confidence between you and the admiral. And so I didn’t pass it on. Interviewer: I have a couple of questions about this. You’re aware in real time, then, that it is a submarine. Mackenzie: Absolutely. Because you’re hearing the conversation. Interviewer: Right. It makes me wonder, as I’m listening to the story, if they had you on duty for all this time, would there have been some knowledge of some kind of danger, that they didn’t let you leave orderly duty? Do you make a connection between the fact that the sub was there and the fact that you had to be on duty for so long? That makes you wonder. Mackenzie: Well, I don’t know. It does, Mary. I never thought about it that way. I don’t think so. I just really think the reason I was left on duty so long is that we were new at our jobs, and they just didn’t realize that when you’re on orderly duty, you’re attached [slapping hands together], you know, at the hip. And not only that, is the admiral doesn’t want to walk out and say, What’s your name? You know, he wants somebody that he can trust and could read him before he says it. I could tell what he wanted. He was looking around and so I call somebody and say, Hey, the skipper’s out of coffee. You better get some in there. See? So you’re his confidant. He’ll say, Well, how are the men thinking? Because he’s some concerned about the morale, or whatever. So you’re his sounding board. Every admiral’s different. Some really use their orderlies. I’ve had admirals when I reported, they’d say, “Well, I’m a little low on cigars, Mackenzie. Why don’t you go down and get me cigars?” Well, I don’t say, ”What kind do you smoke?” So I’d go down and ask the guy to open up the place where you buy the cigars, what’d we call that? Commissary, I think. And they used to question it. And they’d just say, “Well, you sure these are the kind of cigars you smoke, Mackenzie?” And I said, “These are for the skipper.” And he said, “I don’t think so”. And I said, “Really? Why don’t you call and ask him?” [And he’d say], “Oh, OK”. And so that kind of a thing. So, interesting. But anyway, I never did pass that submarine story on to the troops. Interviewer: That’s so interesting. That’s interesting. Mackenzie: And so then, now, as time goes by, Mary, as I watch the History Channel and Discovery Times Channel, all these things are coming back to me. And our main concern was frogmen. We were very afraid of frogmen. And so we figured if they came aboard the ship, how they’d come aboard the ship, what we would do, you know, if one did come on. But I never thought about mines or bombs attached to the ship, and now I think about it. Can you imagine if they could’ve got to our ship, and we had people on their like [J. Robert] Oppenheimer and had all those scientists on there? We had fifty-eight scientists on the ship. We had all the bombs on the ship. I mean what a coup that’d meant for the Russians if our ship accidentally sunk, hit a reef or something, or something went off. You know, you can just see it all right now. It’d be another Cold War incident. Interviewer: But you don’t know that you’re carrying bombs at this point, or do you? Mackenzie: Yes, we did. We knew we were carrying pieces of the bombs. Interviewer: You did. Mackenzie: Yes. Yes. Because security was so tight, it had to be something like that, when only the admiral and two or three people could go in there. And then we timed them, how long they were in, who they were with, they signed in, they signed out. They had a badge with their photograph on it. The badges were made by, at that time, the Atomic Energy Commission [AEC], and they were watermarked with all the same intensity and security as our money. And the admiral would have his picture on there. And I didn’t just look on his shirt. I had to take it off his shirt, which you don’t like to touch an admiral or a captain. It’s just this—you’ve got that—this little [feeling] like, “Hi, God”- that feeling. And you’d take off his badge like that and hold it up right next to his face, make sure you got a really good look at it, and you’d flip it over and check the watermarks, check the number on it. And when I was on, I’d have a check-off list, and his name better be on there. In fact, our own commanding officer forgot to put his name on there and our guys wouldn’t let him in the post. He said, ”What do you mean?” They said, “You’re not on the list, sir.” [And he said], “Well, you know who I am. I’m Captain [James] Brannaman, your commanding officer.” [They] say, “Sir, we been instructed, if your name isn’t on the list, you don’t get on this post”. And the guys loved doing it to him. He wasn’t real happy but. Interviewer: Oh, I’m sure. Who was this captain again? Mackenzie: Captain Brannaman. He’s still alive. Stanford graduate. Super sharp guy. About six-five or so, something like that. Nice man. Interviewer: I’m not well-versed in military things. Is it usual for an admiral to be on the ship? Mackenzie: No. Now the admiral on any operation, the admiral has what he calls his flagship, and he can change his flag when he wants. The Curtiss was an unusual ship, Mary, because it was designed as a seaplane tender, 1939, something like that. It was hit at Pearl Harbor, went all the way through World War II, ended up with seven battle stars. Then after that, the Atomic Energy Commission grabbed it and then converted it for all the testing. So the Marine captain isn’t like a Navy captain. What’s confusing to everybody, and it was to me, too, the captain of the ship, the Navy ship, doesn’t have to be a captain. That’s his job title. OK, and now the Marine captain is a captain and he’s in charge of the Marines. Interviewer: So this is the Marine captain you’re talking about. Mackenzie: The Marine captain, right. Interviewer: Got it. Not the captain of the ship. Mackenzie: Not the ship captain—that’s right. The full transcripts of the two interviews can be found here: Interview with Robert William Mackenzie, January 1, 2005 UNLV Special Collections Portal Interview with G. Nicholas Stuparich, Jr., October 18, 2006 UNLV Special Collections Portal |
2024.06.01 01:52 Trash_Tia Halfway through physics class, time stopped at 2:52pm.
2024.05.31 20:14 Outrageous-Swing-270 3wpo checkup
2024.05.31 18:18 Ok_World_135 Anyone swapped lug nuts to non Ford?
I ordered some new lugnuts that said they "fit 2014 ford fiesta sedan se" so I didnt question it. When they arrived they are probably 3mm less wide than the originals and nearly a half inch taller. The originals cover the bolt stud hole and probably an 1/8th of an inch over it. The new ones MAYBE go a half millimeter over the lip. submitted by Ok_World_135 to FordFiesta [link] [comments] I did notice the bolt stud holes are tapered so its not like these would just go past the edge of the rim and go through but, does anyone have experience with that and is it OK? It weirds me out enough I took them off even though I cant think of a good reason other than, I liked the originals having more lug nut actually touching the rim holding it on. https://preview.redd.it/dx69884hes3d1.png?width=973&format=png&auto=webp&s=22c5d05a9160dc900a7c5ab93cd9bfd94ff629f7 Included a photo that shows the seating of the orginals and the new ones on the same lug nut, in real life they are slightly different sizes but its just there to illustrate where they are seating at on the lug nut itself. The entire reason for this is my stupid lug nut covers have slipped and I have to use a hammer to get the tire iron on. |
2024.05.31 18:07 Bulky-Young8206 'Merica
submitted by Bulky-Young8206 to ISO8601 [link] [comments]
2024.05.31 17:26 assistanteight0 Nick I found one
submitted by assistanteight0 to UNSUBSCRIBEpodcast [link] [comments] |
2024.05.31 17:22 Huxley077 For anyone who installed Eibach lowering springs ( or even other brands ), quick post-install question
2024.05.31 17:03 CommercialBee6585 Reborn as a Fantasy General (Army-Building Isekai) Chapter 56
2024.05.31 15:27 Lekingz-24 What’s a minor inconvenience to Your Oc(s)
2024.05.31 14:52 becausehippo Measuring system in the United States and in the rest of the world
submitted by becausehippo to BooStreet [link] [comments] |
2024.05.31 13:34 AutoMughal Islamic gold rarity leads Morton & Eden June 12 sale - A gold solidus of caliph ‘Abd al-Malik bin Marwan, the first coin to bear the Shahada, a statement of the central belief in Islam.
A rare and important Islamic gold coin highlights Morton & Eden’s June 12 auction in London. submitted by AutoMughal to islamichistory [link] [comments] The circa 691 to 694 gold solidus of caliph ‘Abd al-Malik bin Marwan has a pre-sale estimate of £150,000 to £200,000 ($185,818 to $247,758 U.S.). The coin weighs 4.27 grams and measures 20 millimeters in diameter, slightly smaller and lighter than a Jefferson 5-cent coin. Its historical and religious importance lies in the fact that it is an example of the first gold coin issue to bear the words of the Shahada in its legends, to spread the tenets of Islam. Shahada is a statement of belief that “There is no god but God, He is unique, and Muhammad is the Messenger of God” and is central to Islam. Changing coinage During the Umayyad period of Arab expansion across former Byzantine and Persian lands, experiments were put in motion by the caliph ‘Abd al-Malik bin Marwan to establish a national Islamic currency. In former Byzantine regions where the solidus was well-established as the primary gold coin in commerce, the Arabs started by initially removing all Christian symbolism from the coinage but retaining the images of the Byzantine rulers. The next stage was to eliminate all Latin inscriptions and introduce the Shahada inscribed in kufic script, emphasizing the basic tenets of Islam. Struck around AH 72 to AH 74 (circa A.D. 691 to 694), the offered example is in remarkably fine condition. Ultimately the caliph established a purely epigraphic Islamic coinage in AH 77 (A.D. 697) and coins like this one were demonetized. Tom Eden of Morton & Eden said in a press release: “It was very exciting to be shown this coin, which had in the past been assumed to be a standard Byzantine issue. Careful examination of the edge showed that at some stage it was mounted probably in a jewellery setting and this could be a reason for its survival, for coins like this were supposed to be handed in and melted following the introduction of the first purely Islamic dinars in AH 77. “In the last 42 years only four other examples have appeared for auction – a sign of its great rarity today,” he said. |
2024.05.31 13:00 Diligent_Designer491 Rumi Sun Yoga Mat - Premium Thick Extra Wide Natural Rubber Eco-friendly Grippy Non-Slip Exercise Mat
https://preview.redd.it/m1n3cfr1uq3d1.jpg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a9036cef2ce9142c1e45f8d2ba4914e07d4a731b submitted by Diligent_Designer491 to u/Diligent_Designer491 [link] [comments] Enhance your yoga practice with the Rumi Sun Yoga Mat. Crafted from high-density, anti-tear natural rubber, this premium mat offers unparalleled durability and support. Measuring 71 inches in length, 26 inches in width, and 4.3 millimeters in thickness, it provides ample space for a variety of yoga poses and exercises. The eco-friendly design ensures peace of mind during your workouts, while the grippy non-slip surface offers stability and traction on any floor surface. Whether you're practicing yoga, Pilates, or general fitness routines, this mat is your trusted companion for achieving your wellness goals. Choose the vibrant Peacock color to add a touch of elegance to your workout space. Experience the difference with the Rumi Sun Yoga Mat. |
2024.05.31 07:47 N3rot0xin Gaps in layers, terrible quality after changing filaments
What is going on with these prints? I printed 7 of each, and they all have these layer gaps. Most are around the same layer, but some have the issue much lower on the print. And, the layers in general just look like crap. Recent changes, put a new nozzle in, and flipped the extrusion drive gear around(set screws were facing up, I flipped them to down so I could get a knob on there as I think it was upside down from previous owner). submitted by N3rot0xin to ender3 [link] [comments] Ender 3 pro w/cr touch. Cura Hatchbox white pla. Printed at 190C, 50mm/s 3 walls, random z seam. Cubic sub infill. |
2024.05.31 04:17 5C0L0P3NDR4 Dr. Dartshred or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love K14
so, i am the owner of a full length k14 rainbow pistol courtesy of the ff store. now the barrel for this k14 is a single piece of half inch id cpvc, glued into an adapter to fit in the front of the rainbow. you are meant to disconnect the tube, load a single dart in the rear, and connect it back to the blaster, which is already primed to avoid vacuum loading. used as intended it works flawlessly, and even when used a little as not intended it's still amazing, i like filling the whole length of the tube with half darts to create a shotgun blast. submitted by 5C0L0P3NDR4 to Nerf [link] [comments] this was the beginning of my hubris. k14 is an incredibly powerful spring, and this has a full 11" length of it inside, for a prime weight of nearly 50 pounds requiring you to grip the tube of the blaster in one hand and the prime handle in the other and pull it across your chest as if drawing a bow. as expected, a single half dart out of this blaster is absolutely terrifying and far too fast to use in a war; hitting anyone with this thing should count as attempted murder, i've allowed myself to be shot with it and even through the heavy denim jacket i wore for protection it made me crave the sweet release of death as though i'd been a stung by a bullet ant. for this reason, i have been experimenting with ways to load this blaster in which it will hit softer, allowing it to be used in a war as a sheer novelty, the absurdity of it's prime weight and distance and impracticality of a single shot loaded through the rear of the barrel, while not being a war crime to use on a human being. my first idea was to load the tube full of headless half darts, plus one intact dart behind the head to seal the barrel and work like the wadding of a shotgun shell. having no head, they would be lighter and slower as air would pass through them, plus tumble out of control and be more affected by air resistance, creating a short range, wide spread shotgun blast of harmless, headless foam. this got me curious about increasing the projectile count, and so i began to experiment with shorter and shorter lengths of foam. by doing that i was increasing how many could fit through the length of the barrel, but i had a thought. how could i increase how many could fit across the diameter of the barrel? this was the beginning of my downfall. and so i gathered the sick and weak from my dart collection. crumpled elites, fvjs i could never really use, the cutoffs of homemade half darts, etc. the foam was taken, the heads were discarded, and i began to shred the foam into small slivers, each one loaded into the barrel. the foam-flinging equivalent of pirates loading silverware, swords, and nails into their cannons, a crude but effective grapeshot made of literal trash. the back was loaded with a half dart to push everything through, and another dart head was put in the front to keep things from falling out, i put the barrel in the blaster and aimed at the wall, pulled the trigger... and nothing came out. i tried a few more times, but things wouldn't budge. 'oh well!' i figured, and got the dart head out the front with a pair of needle nose pliers, thinking it was the presence of both a dart and the extra head creating too strong a seal, and poured the shreds out the front. rather, i tried to. see, the shreds wouldn't always stack up how i wanted, sitting next to each other in the tube, and so i would use a ramrod consisting of a pen, a marker, and a screwdriver to push them down and make them do so. little did i know this was cramming the dart shreds into a wad, a ball of shreds lodged in the middle of the tube, like an intestinal blockage of foam. the seal this foam blockage made in the pvc intestine was good enough that it would not budge as the half dart behind slammed into it, and yet leaky enough to allow air to slip through it instead of pushing it through. there was nothing the blaster could do to save itself, even the raw power of k14 was rendered useless by a bolus of darts (do not google bolus) that would not move. so, it was time to resort to the ramrod. in went the screwdriver, the marker behind it, then pen, and i began to push. it was, at first, working smoothly. until suddenly it gave, things sank in a few inches then jammed up completely. as soon as it happened i realized my mistake, that i had inserted the screwdriver with the bit forward. it stabbed through the dart, through the blockage, it's entire body slipping through, except the flare at the end. it was stuck. things just changed. the blockage wasn't just foam and rubber now, but now included solid metal, and it pushed out the foam as it passed through, further stopping up the wad. the ramrod had failed. except, no, the screwdriver had betrayed me, but the ramrod was the only way forward even now. two new men were conscripted, a bolt and a colored pencil, and the pushing continued. slowly, millimeter by millimeter, the foam rubbing against the inside of the pvc causing it to heat up from friction. at times i'd remove the parts of the rod to check inside and confirm my progress, then put everything back in and continue pushing. at some point, i made the mistake of putting the colored pencil in first. a similar give, then jam. the pencil stabbed through just like the screwdriver, and the blockage again bolstered it's own strength using my own tools against me. things now were looking grim. twice the ramrod had failed, and at this point i considered i may have to cut the tube, and settle for a snubnose for my rainbow. until i remembered exactly what stopped the screwdriver, that flare, that now pushed against the blockage and dragged it along. if i could grab the end of the screwdriver and pull, it would drag the rest of the wad through with it and clear the blockage. once more the army was raised and the ramrod formed, and extra caution was taken to ensure it would not stab through this time. millimeter by millimeter, very very slowly, it was pushed through, until eventually i was able to grab the screwdriver through the front with my pliers. with all my strength i pulled, making slow but sure progress, and with an audible pop the blockage was finally cleared. everything you see above was all crammed inside the tube, in a space maybe only an inch and a half long. do not repeat my experiment, lest you fall victim too. |
2024.05.31 01:21 steve_33 Decoding the confusing MrCool condenser installation location diagram
I laugh and cry every time I try to make sense of this diagram. Is the basic idea that you consider any sides on which you might have constraints and then use that row? submitted by steve_33 to DIYHeatPumps [link] [comments] My challenge is that it looks like you always need greater then 39.73" on top but I'd like to put a roof over my condenser. Is that clearance above for maintenance (in case you need to replace the coil?) or is it required for air flow? I am going to make the roof very light and design it so that it can be moved off if maintenance needs to be done. My basic plan is: b distance will be 10" to a solid wall. a will be about 16" to a solid wall. e will be about 6" to a roof that can be removed. d and c will be unlimited (many feet to the next obstruction). Will that be OK? My only hesitation is that the roof on top (surface E) and the wall on the back (surface B) means that there will be a pocket of air in the back without great air flow. https://preview.redd.it/vjq6k9p4dn3d1.png?width=643&format=png&auto=webp&s=d67e4d6bb77221ad1a066b79c6844c822e0b859a |
2024.05.30 19:46 eggyboyboy MPC One+ vs MPC One dimensional differences?
Can any owners of the MPC One+ please confirm with me the distances (in either inches or millimeters, center to center) of these screws on the underside of the MPC One+? submitted by eggyboyboy to mpcusers [link] [comments] For reference, the bottommost screws in the image are right next to the frontside of the MPC, with the left screw being underneath the SD card slot and headphone jack. On the MPC One, measurement 'X' is about 5.3 inches and measurement 'Y' is about 5.45 inches. I am looking to have someone confirm that the measurements are the same for the MPC One+. If you could also reply with a photo of the underside of your MPC One+ that would also be awesome! Thank you in advance! |
2024.05.30 19:34 purplepaintedpumpkin Anyone else with a taller than average but lighter than average baby?
2024.05.30 06:30 GhoulGriin Best 110 Qt Cooler
submitted by GhoulGriin to u/GhoulGriin [link] [comments] https://preview.redd.it/twtp4wn8rh3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=003a8e52b780825a73d28183fab42033e0367375 Welcome to our roundup of the best 110 Qt Coolers on the market! In this article, we'll be taking a closer look at the top-rated products, highlighting their key features and benefits to help you make an informed decision. Whether you're planning a BBQ, tailgating, or just need to keep your drinks cool during a hot summer day, we've got you covered with our expert recommendations and buying advice. So sit back, relax, and let's dive into the world of ice-cold refreshment. The Top 19 Best 110 Qt Cooler
Reviews🔗YETI Tundra 35 Cooler: FatWall Design, Rotomolded Construction, and Rugged Performancehttps://preview.redd.it/z0ucwrh9rh3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5e88ff23527ce61620ebefadefd25fe2888893a0 Yeti Tundra 35, your perfect adventure buddy. In my recent adventure, I got to try out the Yeti Tundra 35 and it did not disappoint. The FatWall design adds extra strength, and the PermaFrost insulation ensures your food and beverages stay chill for days. The T-Rex lid latches are sturdy and easy to use, even with the rotomolded construction. However, despite its impressive features, this cooler is a beast to handle. It's heavy and when you're packing up, you need some muscle to lug it around. But once it's in place, it's there to stay. Overall, the Yeti Tundra 35 is a reliable choice for a small crew or personal hauls. Just be prepared for the extra weight. 🔗Heavy-Duty Ice Retention Cooler- YETI Tundra 110 Qthttps://preview.redd.it/vah00gv9rh3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=446eb4a669c5e69cf1e15bc1cde0b589b07454e6 As someone who has had the pleasure of using the YETI Tundra 110 Cooler for my weekend river expeditions, I must say it's a game-changer. This durable cooler keeps ice locked in for hours, thanks to its Vortex Drain System and PermaFrost Insulation that creates a form-fitting barrier from the outside elements. The rotomolded construction is a definite pro, as it makes the cooler virtually indestructible and perfect for my outdoor adventures. One feature that stood out for me was the heavy-duty all-purpose cooler design, which is extremely durable and indestructible. It's also incredibly easy to transport, thanks to the anchor point tie-down slots and lip-grip handles. The non-slip feet are a great addition, as they prevent the cooler from slipping and sliding around. However, despite its pros, the YETI Tundra 110 Cooler does have a few cons. For one, it's quite heavy, which can be a bit of a challenge for solo transportation. Additionally, while the Tundra 110 can hold a hefty 90 pounds of ice, the interior dimensions might not be as spacious as one would expect, given its size. Overall, the YETI Tundra 110 Cooler is a worthy investment for outdoor enthusiasts, those who embark on long river expeditions, and even those who just want a cooler that can keep their food and drinks ice-cold for days. 🔗ULTRA-TOUGH Cooler for All Occasions 110 Qt Capacityhttps://preview.redd.it/97fsb7iarh3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=62e6d936725520cd7426e905d1d395dca4bafa61 I recently took my RTIC 110 Qt Ultra-Tough Cooler on a camping trip and it exceeded my expectations. The hard rotomolded construction is impressive and it was easy to carry around thanks to the heavy-duty rope handles. It impressed me how well the cooler insulated the contents, keeping food and beverages cold even in high temperatures. One thing that stood out to me is the ice retention - it really does a great job of keeping ice frozen for a long time. I placed some frozen meat at the bottom of the cooler and separated it from the rest of the food using the divider wall. I also used the basket at the top to keep cheese and sandwich meat away from any water below. I put two bags of ice in the cooler - one with loose ice and the other in a bag. To my surprise, the ice in the bag didn't melt at all. The food didn't stay completely frozen, but it was still cold throughout the trip. The cooler also doubled as a makeshift bench, step stool, and tabletop during our camping trip. Despite our campsite being quite cold, the cooler handled it well and even slid around easily when we needed to move it. It's definitely a tough and reliable product that I'm glad I invested in. I highly recommend the RTIC 110 Qt Ultra-Tough Cooler for anyone looking for a durable and insulated cooler for their next adventure. 🔗Ultra-Durable Food-Grade Cooler for Hot and Cold Storagehttps://preview.redd.it/cjom65uarh3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d23c4568910ce8ad15488ec61829129976b223c5 The 110 Qt White Rotomolded Hard Cooler has been a trusty companion in my outdoor adventures. This cooler's robustness is unmatched, with its hot and cold resistance adding a layer of convenience. The food grade LLDPE material it's made from guarantees safety, while the corrosion and UV resistant features make it a reliable choice for all weather conditions. I was genuinely impressed by its ability to keep food fresh for days without power. Overall, it's a top-notch cooler that delivers on both functionality and durability. 🔗Coastland Delta Series 65 Quart Rotomolded Cooler: Durable and Insulated for Outdoor Adventureshttps://preview.redd.it/38r9k0kbrh3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=297e0258fdb9d010dbf026435f887ea997378357 The Coastland Delta Series 65Quart Rotomolded Cooler has truly become a dependable companion for my outdoor adventures. The rotomolded construction ensures durability, and the premium features like heavy-duty rubber latches and freezer-grade lid gasket make it airtight, keeping my food and drinks fresh for an amazing 7-10+ days. The hard sided design is perfect for weekend trips like camping, float trips, sporting events, and hunting. The added perks of a heavy flow drain attachment, no-skid rubber foot pads, and a built-in fish ruler make this cooler user-friendly and versatile. It's not just a cooler, but an essential tool for making every adventure a little bit cooler. 🔗Viking-Inspired 110 Qt Coolerhttps://preview.redd.it/7dyytlvbrh3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c715998d2731c2eceb7da23f01c07a776efb2f60 I recently had the chance to test out the Longship Series 110 Qt Cooler, and I must say, I was quite impressed. With a 4.5-star rating and 2855 reviews, this cooler has been well-received by many. In terms of its construction, the Longship Series cooler is both sturdy and easy to maneuver. The polyurethane wheel and steel axle make moving it around a breeze, even when faced with various obstacles. The charcoal color adds a touch of sophistication, fitting perfectly with any outdoor gathering. However, one thing to note is that it might be a bit heavy to lift for some users, but overall, it's a reliable and efficient cooler for all your adventures. 🔗Elegant Extendable Cooler for Outdoor Events and BBQshttps://preview.redd.it/ag2nxkjcrh3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=41b5d696bdf90f708205207b1c454d363a573839 As a frequent camper and outdoor enthusiast, I was thrilled to try out the Igloo 110 Qt Cooler during my recent camping trip. The cooler's large capacity and robust construction caught my eye from the get-go. Upon arrival, I noticed the Thermecool insulation layer that promised to keep my ice for up to 5 days in 30-degree Celsius weather. One of the first things I noticed was the comfortable handle, which made carrying the cooler a breeze, even when fully loaded. The retractable handle also came in handy when storing the cooler in tight spaces. The Marine Glide 110's UV protection and stainless steel parts were a perfect fit for my boat, providing an extra layer of durability for my travels on the water. However, there were a few issues I encountered along the way. The latches on the cooler seemed a bit flimsy, which was a bit of a letdown considering the cooler's overall build. I found myself replacing the latches after just a few uses, which was a bit of a hassle. Additionally, the cooler's wheels, while useful, were not the sturdiest, making it a bit challenging to maneuver over uneven terrain. Despite these minor flaws, I found the Igloo 110 Qt Cooler to be an excellent option for those looking for an affordable, versatile cooler that can handle a variety of outdoor activities. Its large capacity and extendable handle make it a great choice for weekend camping trips or day outings at the beach or park. With a few minor improvements, this cooler could be a top contender in the market. 🔗Igloo Sportsman Glide 110-Quart Cooler: 5 Day Performance, Horizontal Handle, and Virtually Indestructible Designhttps://preview.redd.it/7s38eu0drh3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e3b42dd1fe0d18b3a96539c199af349fc4902d61 Whether you're a fisherman, sportsman, or just a weekend adventurer, the Igloo Sportsman Glide Cooler is the perfect companion to keep your supplies or catch cold. The simple yet effective design makes it easy to lift and pull this large, fully-loaded cooler. With oversized wheels and a comfort-grip handle, you can enjoy a smooth ride with 50% less effort. What I particularly love about this cooler is its foam insulation that allows for maximum cold performance, lasting up to five days. The horizontal telescoping handle is another game-changer, making it easier to lift and pull the cooler. The handle is cushioned, allowing for a comfortable towing experience. The cooler also comes with virtually indestructible stainless steel hinges, ensuring durability and reliability. The impact-resistant Duralatch lid closures add an extra layer of protection, making sure your cooler stays closed and secure. However, one thing that might be a bit of a downer is the plastic latches, which seem a bit flimsy compared to the metal hinges. I've heard some users mention that they've had issues with the latches not staying locked, which is something to consider. Overall, the Igloo Sportsman Glide Cooler is a fantastic option for anyone looking for a reliable, durable cooler. Its features like foam insulation, horizontal telescoping handle, and comfortable towing handle make it a standout choice. Just be aware of the plastic latches and make sure to keep them secure to ensure the best performance from your cooler. 🔗Coleman 100 Qt. Wheeled Cooler: Versatile and Durable for Outdoor Funhttps://preview.redd.it/osxa72pdrh3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a7dc7bf2cfd0d710f2ed9631b739027be60efa5e Recently, I had the pleasure of trying out the Coleman 316 Series 100-Quart Wheeled Cooler. Now, I must admit, when I first saw it, the size caught my attention. It's quite enormous and can easily hold up to 160 cans – a serious party starter! One of the first things I noticed was how effortlessly it rolls on the 6-inch wheels. It's a relief for those, like me, not fond of lifting heavy objects. The Coleman promises up to 5 days of ice retention, and although I haven't tested it for that long, it has performed exceptionally well during numerous weekend getaways. The molded handle not only makes it easy to move around but also doubles as a seat. Though the lid is fully insulated and seals well, the lid's construction made me a little concerned. It has a tendency to warp, which leads to the seal wearing off. The cooler's drain, situated at the back, has caused a bit of an issue too. In a full load, it drags on the plug, which might cause damage in the long run. Overall, the Coleman 316 Series Wheeled Cooler has proven to be a reliable and spacious addition to my outdoor escapades. However, its drawbacks, like the flimsy lid and the risk of drained plug damage, are noteworthy. Despite these pitfalls, the positives far outweigh the negatives, making it a reasonable investment for those seeking a convenient and efficient cooler for their outings. 🔗Extra Large Industrial Ice Chest Coolerhttps://preview.redd.it/ojff4aydrh3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d1079b9ea7b5458026241f187ffd86fd4aeb2b4d The Icey-Tek 1100 Qt Commercial Roto-Molded Ice Chest Cooler has been my trusty friend on many fishing and boating adventures. This massive ice chest is perfect for those who need to store a lot of food and drinks for a large group, as it can easily fit 1100 quarts of ice. It's well-designed for commercial fishing applications, making it a sturdy and reliable option for any industrial setup. One feature that stood out for me is its roto-molded construction, which ensures durability and resistance to wear and tear. However, it's also quite heavy, so it might be challenging to transport it on your own. Despite this, I've found it to be an excellent investment that keeps my beer nice and cold even in the hottest of summer afternoons. While it's not the sleekest or most stylish cooler on the market, the Icey-Tek 1100 Qt Commercial Roto-Molded Ice Chest Cooler gets the job done with ease. Its size and ruggedness are perfect for those needing a large, dependable ice chest for their outdoor adventures. 🔗Insulated 110Qt Coolerhttps://preview.redd.it/8cdodxderh3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=47486e2f3fa986a569dc703d236755e07ffc4e83 I've been using this 110 Qt White Rotomolded Cooler for quite some time now, and let me tell you, it's been a game changer in my daily life. Not only does it keep my food and drinks cold for days without any power, but it also functions wonderfully as a hot cooler! One of the most impressive things about this cooler is its durability – it's made of a food-grade LLDPE material that's incredibly resistant to corrosion, UV rays, and toxins, making it safe and long-lasting. The fact that it doesn't require any power to maintain freshness for several days is also a major plus for me. On the downside, I've noticed that the cooler is quite large and might be challenging to transport or store in small spaces. Also, even though it claims to keep things hot as well, the performance could be improved. But all in all, I'm pretty satisfied with this cooler and I think it'll come in handy for many outdoor adventures I have planned. 🔗Igloo MaxCold Sportsman 120 Qt. Cooler: Eco-friendly, Versatile, and Durable Cooler for Outdoor Adventureshttps://preview.redd.it/6kpjj5verh3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=039232b64e5773447443700bc8926c745f48f3f9 Last summer, I decided to try out the Igloo MaxCold Sportsman 120 Qt. Cooler, Sandstone & Carbonite for our family camping trip. It's safe to say that it exceeded our expectations! I was impressed by how effortlessly it carried our food, drinks, and ice for the weekend. The insulated walls did a fantastic job keeping everything cool and fresh, even in the scorching summer heat. What really stood out was the quick-access hatch, which made it so easy to grab a drink or snack without having to open the entire lid and let the warm air in. It also had sturdy swing-up handles, making it easy to carry and move around. The integrated tie-down loops were a nice touch, keeping the cooler securely in place while still allowing us to access it on the go. Now, I can't forget to mention the leakproof threaded drain plug, which made it easy to clean up after our camping trip. However, I did find one issue: the latches didn't seem as strong as I would have liked. But overall, the Igloo MaxCold Sportsman 120 Qt. Cooler, Sandstone & Carbonite was a game-changer for our outdoor adventures. 🔗RTIC 110 Qt Ultra-Tough Hard Shell Coolerhttps://preview.redd.it/jedu5x8frh3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=2c1f8428b638c16e84f83f6758e3f0d9151255ae I recently had the chance to use the RTIC 110 Qt Ultra-Tough Cooler for a weekend camping trip. I was impressed with its durable construction and heavy-duty rope handles that made it easy to haul around. One of the standout features is the ice retention ability – the closed-cell foam insulation kept our perishables cold for days. However, there were some drawbacks, too. Despite its portability, the cooler is quite heavy at 53 lbs, making it a little challenging to lift. Additionally, the hinged lid doesn't always close securely, which led me to worry about potential food spills. Overall, the RTIC 110 Qt Ultra-Tough Cooler shines in both durability and insulation. While there are a few design elements that could be improved, I have no doubt that this cooler will serve me well on future camping adventures. 🔗Heavy-Duty Portable Insulated Ice Chest Cooler for Outdoor Adventureshttps://preview.redd.it/yuxczqpfrh3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a26b3348f37caef564a2cf74431bf2668ad24c22 Imagine being out on the river, enjoying the beauty of nature, and having a convenient and practical way to keep your beverages cold for the entire journey. That's exactly what the Driftsun Heavy-Duty Portable Insulated Cooler offers. With its large 110-quart capacity, I can store enough food and drinks to last for days, making it the perfect companion for any adventure. The insulation in this cooler is top-notch, providing enough cold retention for an impressive 7 to 10 days. I've had the chance to test it in different conditions, and it held up quite well, even when temperatures reached the 100s. The ThermalLock freezer-style gasket ensures that the insulation does its job efficiently. The locking lid system not only gives peace of mind in preventing your cooler from being opened by unwanted hands but also helps in keeping the contents secure during transportation. The UV-resistant thermoplastic material is tough and rugged, making it ideal for various settings. One aspect I particularly liked about this cooler is the tie-down slots and non-slip feet. It's a convenient feature that ensures the cooler stays in place and doesn't roll off during use. These design elements show Driftsun's attention to detail and their commitment to providing a high-quality product. However, although I had a smooth experience with this cooler, I did notice that carrying the insulated 110-quart ice chest is a bit heavy. Nevertheless, the pros far outweigh the cons and make the Driftsun Heavy-Duty Insulated Ice Chest a must-have for outdoor enthusiasts. Buyer's GuideA 110 Qt cooler is a large capacity, portable outdoor appliance designed to keep your food and beverages cool and refreshing during picnics, barbecues, and other outdoor events. It provides ample storage and is versatile enough to hold a variety of items. Before purchasing a 110 Qt cooler, consider several factors to ensure you choose the right one for your needs.Capacity and Sizehttps://preview.redd.it/cfgltgrhrh3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4637c5e44c26e2887002deebf5dd210316dc8190 The 110 Qt cooler's large capacity allows you to store a significant amount of food and beverages. When selecting a cooler, consider the total amount of items you will need to store and the space you have available for transport and storage at your outdoor location. Make sure to measure your car trunk or transportation method to ensure the cooler will fit. InsulationInsulation plays a crucial role in keeping your items cool and maintaining the cooler's temperature. Look for a cooler with good insulation material that will maintain the coldness of your items for an extended period. Foam insulation is a popular choice in coolers, but other materials like polyurethane and polystyrene can offer better insulation.Construction and DurabilityA durable and reliable cooler is essential for outdoor use. Consider the cooler's construction materials and features that can withstand the wear and tear of outdoor activities, such as UV resistance and impact-resistant materials. https://preview.redd.it/211ges2irh3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ca8cecd1aa4f7daf4d7a63f7eb04463b6098b830 MaterialsCoolers can be made from various materials, each with its advantages and disadvantages. Rotomolded plastic coolers are strong, lightweight, and offer excellent insulation. Stainless steel coolers are durable and rust-resistant, but can be quite heavy. Consider which material best suits your needs and budget.Additional FeaturesSome coolers come with additional features like built-in wheels, handles, drain plugs, and dividers. Evaluate which features would be most beneficial for your outdoor activities, like easy transport or separate compartments for different types of food and beverages.Ease of Use and Maintenancehttps://preview.redd.it/sj4lnmlirh3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f9ab836bcbae731463ecc16d13d646122f95abce Choose a cooler that is easy to clean and maintain. Look for coolers with removable liners or surfaces that can be washed easily. Additionally, some coolers may require specific cleaning instructions, so be sure to follow the manufacturer's guidelines for proper care. Price and ValueFinally, consider your budget when shopping for a 110 Qt cooler. While more expensive models may offer better insulation and durability, there are still affordable options that can meet your needs. Assess the overall value of a cooler based on its capacity, features, and maintenance requirements before making a purchase.When shopping for a 110 Qt cooler, take the time to research and compare different brands and models. By carefully considering the factors mentioned above, you can ensure that you choose a cooler that meets your needs and provides excellent value for your money. FAQhttps://preview.redd.it/ame2azhjrh3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=226f24be0e30363de4f7029811885b201a38a14c What is an 110 Qt Cooler?An 110 Qt Cooler is a portable cooler with a capacity of 110 quarts, which is sufficient for storing large quantities of food and drinks. These coolers are designed to keep items cool for extended periods, making them ideal for outdoor events, camping trips, or picnics.What features should I look for in an 110 Qt Cooler?
What are the benefits of using an 110 Qt Cooler?
How should I clean and maintain an 110 Qt Cooler?To clean your 110 Qt Cooler, empty it and wipe the interior and exterior surfaces with a damp cloth. For stubborn stains, use soapy water, but avoid using harsh chemicals that could damage the cooler's materials. It is also essential to dry the cooler thoroughly before storing it to prevent mold growth.Are there any safety concerns when using an 110 Qt Cooler?When using an 110 Qt Cooler, ensure that it is placed on a level surface to prevent accidents. Additionally, avoid overloading the cooler, as this may lead to damage or instability. Always follow the manufacturer's instructions for safe and proper use.As an Amazon™ Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. |
2024.05.29 17:27 ExtremeGaming17 Where can I get haircuts?
2024.05.29 16:53 Oskar_de_Grauche Tubeless repair question
2024.05.29 13:02 teuast Does anybody happen to know if a VegaTrem VT2ND bridge will fit on my 102S?
2024.05.29 07:33 Large-Presence6684 Just a little rant