1. Policija je že odkrila identiteto posameznih članov skupine, ki se predstavlja kot Slovenska obrambna straža, nosi maskirna oblačila in na družbenih omrežjih objavlja posnetke z grožnjami migrantom. Prijav potencialnih žrtev sicer niso prejeli.
2. Direktor PU LJ Tomislav Omejec je pojasnil, da so že identificirali nekatere člane te skupine. "Gre za mlajše osebe, nekateri so bili že obravnavani v policijskih postopkih," torej lahko sklepamo, da ne gre za vzorne posameznike, temveč verjetno za znane prestopnike. Vir: https://www.instagram.com/reel/C7ebDS4P439/
3. Vemo tudi, da je vsaj en dijak srednje šole v LJ, a imena seveda ne bomo razkrivali, morda gre za mladoletnika, zato nas to ne zanima itd.
4. Domnevno naj bi bil vodja Urban Purgar, sicer tudi član Rumenih jopičev, znane (domnevno?) neonacistične skupine https://www.reddit.com/Slovenia/comments/1d1qyh1/urban_purgar_zloglasni_neo_nacist_in_rumeni_jopi%C4%8D/
5. Domnevne povezave med Perom Martićev, Nejcem Urbanijo in SOS-ovcem?

SIMBOLI SOVRAŠTVA

Nerdanel also was firm of will, but more patient than Fëanor, desiring to understand minds rather than to master them, and at first she restrained him when the fire of his heart grew too hot; but his later deeds grieved her, and they became estranged.

“No serious anatomist today would attempt to deduce from a skeleton 💀 the spiritual 🧘🏽‍♀️ aptitudes or achievements of its one-time owner.”
— Gordon Childe (29A/1926), The Aryans: a Study of Indo-European Origins (pg. 163-64) (post)

DNA 🧬 ≠ tongue 👅 of speech 🗣️ made by brain 🧠

The research, led by a team from Tel Aviv University, excavated remains from Misliya Cave on Mount Carmel, northern Israel. The cave is part of a complex of prehistoric caves along the mountain, which show successive periods of occupation by early human species. The team found part of a fossil human jaw with anatomical features that correspond to the modern human species Homo sapiens, as opposed to other pre-modern humans such as Neanderthals.

The researchers dated teeth from the jaw and flint tools found with the remains, obtaining an average age for the specimens of about 177,000-194,000 years old. Until now, the earliest fossil evidence for Homo sapiens outside Africa was from other sites in Israel, dating up to 130,000 years ago.

“To the black 👨🏿‍🦲 and frizzled-haired 👨🏾 Egyptians, we owe our arts, sciences, and even the use of speech 🗣️ itself.”
— Constantin Volney (168A/1787), comment to Thomas Jefferson

“Then perhaps, you would like to tell me, that when Herodotus (Histories, §2.104) uses the term: melanchroes (μελαχρινός) [book: here] [images: here], to describe Egyptians, what he means?”
— Guy Rogers (A41/1996), Black Athena debate, Part Four (1:37:30-)

From New Latin, from Ancient Greek stem of μέλας (mélas, “black”) +‎ -in.

Histories, §2.104, said that Colchains ( Κολχίς), a section of the early Greek empire, "are clearly Egyptians" because they "woolly hair" and are "dark-skined" 👨🏾 or melanchroes (μελαχρινός) or μελα (mela-), from: μέλας (mélas), meaning: “black” + -χρινός (-chrinos), meaning: "ethnicity [?]"

“Not so fast. The key word in the original Greek of the passage is ‘melanchroes’. Contrary to what Afrocentrists claim, it does NOT mean ‘black’, in the sense of belonging to the black race.
For that, Greek authors would have used “aethiops” (etymologically, “burned face”), the term that indisputably referred to Nubians and other peoples in what is today Sub-Saharan Africa. Herodotus does not refer to Egyptians with this term. Furthermore, in the very same passage quoted above, Herodotus implies that Colchians and Egyptians are of the same stock. Colchis is on the shores of the Black Sea, hardly an area inhabited by black people. Melanchroes means simply “dark-skinned,” a term that sometimes the Greeks even applied to themselves and other not-so-dark peoples, such as Syrians.”
— Gabriel Andrade (A65/2020), “Herodotus and Long-Standing Problems in Anthropology”, Apr 27

“I am forcefully against the nationalist and racist hypothesis of an original identity between Indo-Germans and Germans and the attempts to place the ‘original home’ on German territory.”
— Sigmund Feist (41A/1914), Indo-Europeans and Germanic People (pg. 1) [13]

1. Young, as far as I know, just called the language family as “Indo-European”, but did not name a location?

• [1] (a) Schlegel, Friedrich. (147A/1808). On the Speech and Wisdome of India (Uber de Sprache und Weisheit der Indier). Publisher. (b) Arvidsson (pg. 28).
• [2] Arvidsson, Stefan. (A45/2000). Aryan Idols: Indo-European Mythology as Ideology and Science (Ariska idoler: Den indoeuropeiska mytologin som ideologi och vetenskap) (translator: Sonia Wishmann) (pdf-file) (Jones, pg. 18; Young, pg. 20; Pott, pg. 60; Kossina, pg. 142; Muller, pg. 142). Chicago, A51/2006.
• [3] (a) Jones, William. (171A/1784). “On the Gods of Greece, Italy, and India”, Publisher. (b) Jones, William. (156A/1799). The Works of Sir William Jones, Volume One (§: On the Gods of Greece, Italy, and India, pgs. 229-80; Moses, pg. 233; Jupiter, 14+ pgs.; main, pg. 248). Robinson. (c) Arvidsson (pg. 33).
• [4] (a) Posche, Theodor. (77A/1878). The Aryans (Die Arier). Publisher. (b) Arvidsson (pg. 142).
• [5] (a) Latham, Robert G. (104A/1851). “Introduction” to Tacitus’ Germania. Publisher. (b) Arvidsson (pg. 142).
• [6] (a) Penka, Karl. (89A/1866). The Origin of the Aryans (Die Herkunft der Arier). Publisher. (b) Arvidsson (pg. 143).
• [7] (a) Kossina, Gustaf. (53A/1902). “Die Indogermanische Frage archäologisch beantwortet” (Jstor), Zeitschrift für Ethnologie (ZfE) / Journal of Social and Cultural Anthropology (JSCA), 34:161-222 (62-pages). (b) Arvidsson (pg. 143).
• [8] Chamberlain, Stewart. (56A/1899). The Foundations of the Nineteenth Century, Volume One (Die Grundlagen des Neunzehnten Jahrhunderts, Band eins) (pg. 224) . Brukmann, 54A/1901. (b) Chamberlain, Stewart. (56A/1899). The Foundations of the Nineteenth Century, Volume Two (Die Grundlagen des Neunzehnten Jahrhunderts Band zwei) (pg. 559). Brukmann, 54A/1901. (c) Arvidsson (pg. 156).
• [9] Heggart, Paul; Gray, Russel; +31 authors. (A68/2023). "Language trees with sampled ancestors support a hybrid model for the origin of Indo-European languages", Science, 381(6656), Jul 28.
• [10] Jones, Eppie; +22 authors. (A60/2015). "Upper Palaeolithic genomes reveal deep roots of modern Eurasians" (text), Nature Communications. 6(8912): 8912, Nov.
• [11] (a) Thims, Libb. (A63/2023). "Post (13 Oct), post (3 Nov), post (14 Nov)", Reddit, Alphanumerics"; (b) Note: the proto (P) home of PIE, NOT as a "DNA-linked genetic 🧬 family", but as an EAN EgyptoLinguistics based "tongue 👅-linked language family", becomes "Abydos", and the name of the new language family is: EgyptoIndoEuropean (EIE).
• [12] (a) Blumenbach, Johann. (180A/1775). Of the Native Variety of the Generation of Humans (De Generis Humani Varietate Nativa) (3rd edition). Publisher, 160A/1795; (b) Martin Bernal argues that as the term “Aryan” was merged with “Caucasian”, shortly after the 160A (1795) coining of Caucasian; (c) Caucasian, e.g. here (coined, comment), here (coined, post).
• [13] (a) Feist, Sigmund. (41A/1914). Indo-Europeans and Germanic People: a contribution to European prehistoric research (Indogermanen und Germanen: ein Beitrag zur europäischen Urgeschichtsforschung) (pg. 1). Verlag; (b) Arvidsson (pg. 173).
• [14] See: quote.
• [15] (a) Wust, Walther. (13A/1942). Indo-European Confession (Indogermanisches Bekenntnis). Verlag; (b) Arvidsson (pgs. 190-91).
• [16] Hirt, Hermann. (48A/1907). The Indo-Germanic People (Die Indo-germanen) (pg. 430) Publisher; (b) Arvidsson (pgs. 197-98).
• [17] (a) Hitler, Adolf. (30A/1925). My Fight (Mein Kampf) (translator: Ralph Manheim) (pg. 290). Mifflin, 2A/1943; (b) Arvidsson (pgs. 198-99).
• [18] (a) Wirth, Hermann. (27A/1928). The Rise of Humanity: Investigations into the History of Religion, Symbolism and Writing of the Atlantic-Nordic Race: Text Volume I: the Basics (Der Aufgang der Menschheit: Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der Religion, Symbolik und Schrift der atlantisch-nordischen Rasse: Textband I: die Grundzüge). Publisher; (b) Arvidsson (pg. 207) notes that Wirth’s eccentric Atlantis home PIE land theory was popular to the Nazis, allowing him to become cofounder of the SS-Ahnenerbe in A20/1935.
• [19] Anthony, David. (A52/2007). The Horse, the Wheel, and Language: How Bronze-Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World (Arch). Princeton, A55/2010.
• [20] (a) Schrader, Otto. (72A/1883). Language Comparison and Prehistory (Sprachvergleichung und Urgeschichte). Publisher, 66A/1889; (b) Arvidsson (pgs. 256, 266).
• [21] (a) Childe, Gordon. (29A/1926). The Aryans: a Study of the Indo-European Origins (pg. 83). Kegan. (b) Arvidsson (pgs. 283, 285).
• [22] (a) Atkinson, Quentin. (A57/2012). “Mapping the Origins and Expansion of the Indo-European Language Family” (abst) (review), Science, Aug 24; (b) Anon. (A60/2015). ”How Indo-European Languages Evolved” (video), YouTube, Business Insider, Jan 21.

• 𓁟 [C3] = Thoth, Egyptian god inventor of types, aka “glyphs” or letters.
• 𓋇 [R30] = Seshat = Egyptian goddess of numbers, i.e. the number of the cord length measure in cubits of things, e.g. temple dimensions or farming land, attached to a “name” of a person, place, or thing, in the form of a secret name, made by Thoth’s glyph-letters.
• Egypto = prefix-form of Egyptian, used in “Egypto alpha-numerics” (EAN), coined by Thims, independent of Swift, per influence of Martin Bernal (A32/1987) and his “Egypto-Greek” terminology.

“The examination of this triune concept of letter-number-element, and its elaboration in ancient and medieval scholarship will be the object of the thesis chapters.

It is a work in two phases and nine chapters which follow rather loosely historical chronology: first a defining phase, specific, descriptive and idiographic (Part I), restricted mostly to the Graeco-Latin tradition, and then a comparative phase, illustrative, synthetic and cosmopolitan (Parts II and III).

Part I establishes the object of my research in all its dimensions: Chapter 1 is the most textual based of the thesis. It is devoted to the grammatical aspect, and it runs mostly as a series of glosses to passages from philosophers and to the commentaries on the grammar primer attributed to Dionysius Thrax. Chapter 2 deals with the arithmetical aspects, with a special emphasis on the Pythagorean tradition [Greek alphanumerics], and in particular on the fragments attributed to Philolaus and on the Introduction to Arithmetic by Nicomachus of Gerasa.
Part II includes four chapters, mining the scriptural traditions of late Hellenistic and early medieval periods, incorporating the views of evolving, growing and nascent Abrahamic religions. Chapter 3 studies Jewish Biblical and Rabbinic texts [Hebrew alphanumerics], and Chapter 4 does the same with early Christian sources [Christian alphanumerics]. Chapter 5 tries to deal in unitary fashion with the very heterogeneous body of late Hellenistic Hermetic, Gnostic and magic texts, and Chapter 6 looks at the Quranic and related Islamic exegetical literature.
Part III, in three chapters, explores some specific cases of Abrahamic alphanumeric cosmology in a dually understood ’theurgic’ dimension: as the creative act of the world-making deity, and as the divinely oriented work of man; hence this part includes texts more closely related to cosmogony, liturgy, magic, and alchemy. Chapter 7 focuses on the basic structure and concepts of the above-mentioned Sefer Yetsirah; Chapter 8 looks at certain Celtic and Scholastic Christian practices and doctrines; and finally Chapter 9 follows the alphanumeric elements through major Islamic philosophical texts, including the Epistles of the Brethren of Purity and some texts by Muhyi al-Din ibn Arabi.
The time span covered by the research is given, roughly, by the two ends of what I suggest we may call the ‘alphanumeric age,’ between the late sixth century BC [2500A/-545], when numerals and letters first coalesced in the Greek Milesian system, and the twelfth century AD [400A/+1555], when the introduction of the Indo-Arabic numerals around the Mediterranean was becoming generalised and letters and numbers ceased to have a single 'body.' This will be discussed in some more detail in the final Conclusion.

“Aside from excellent specialised works on Jewish, Islamic and Hermetic alphanumeric cosmology, there is a remarkable dearth of English-language literature on this topic in general. There are two major contributions, both originally in German and never translated into English.
The one closest to my research, though second in chronological order, is Franz Dornseiff's 37A/1922 monograph: The Alphabet in Mysticism and Magic; or Stoicheia: Studies on the History of the Ancient Worldview and Greek Science (Das Alphabet in Mystik und Magie (= Stoicheia: Studien zur Geschichte des antiken Weltbildes und der griechischen Wissenschaft). Dornseiff himself expresses in his introduction the desirable opening towards more Eastern sources than he could include. I hope that this thesis will at least in some ways be a contribution towards that desideratum, as it is also an updating of sources regarding these topics of alphanumeric symbolism and alphanumeric speculation broadly speaking.
The second major landmark is Hermann Diels' Elementum (64A/1899), a comprehensive historical lexicological work, tracing the history of the words στοιχειον [ΣΤΟΙΧΕΙΟΝ] [𓆙 Ⓣ ◯ 𓇰 𓊖 {𓂺 𓏥} 𓇰 ◯ 𓏂] [stoicheion] and elementum in great detail, and of the many variations of the ’letter simile’ (Buchstabengleichnis) and the ‘lettercase simile’ (Schriftkastenbild, assuming a set of moveable printing types). Dornseiff's work became an undisputed reference work for the subject and had no direct continuators, but Diels' prompted several kinds of partial refutations and additions on different fronts. Lagercranz (44A/1911), Vollgraff (6A/1949), Koller (0A/1955), Burkert (A4/1959), and Schwabe (A25/1980) were explicitly in dialogue with Diels mostly about the Greek term, while Rogge (32A/1923), Sittig (A3/1952), and Coogan (A19/1974) focused on elementum.
Lumpe (A7/1962) gives a brief account summarising much of Diels from the perspective of conceptual history. Balks (A10/1965), barely cited elsewhere, gives what I consider an important insight into the metric and prosodic associations of the Greek. Druart (A13/1968) has examined very carefully the use and scope of στοιχειον [ΣΤΟΙΧΕΙΟΝ] [stoicheion] in Plato's works, complemented by the more recent work by Laspia, who gives a very useful summary of the status questionis. I should also mention here an important recent work by Weiss' which takes Dornseiff as starting point.
Drawing variously from the above, the following have elaborated more on aspects of the concept itself and less on the philological aspect. Ryle (Α5/1960) deals with logic and the Platonic theory of forms; Lohmann (Α25/1980) with mathematical related terms; Vogt-Spira (Α36/1991) studies the phonetic-written duality, and Crowley (Α50/2005) treats specifically Aristotle's usage. Among encyclopedic articles, I have found Kittel’s and Blossner's particularly orientating.
My primary intention in this new research on an old theme is to go back to the original texts and to expand the range of texts examined; in particular to study the semantic analogies found in Hebrew and Arabic, which with Greek and Latin constitute the main scholarly languages of the Mediterranean Middle Ages. This expansion of the field of vision is of course made possible by profiting from the insights of all the above scholars.
As may be surmised, given such precedents, this work pertains initially to philology or historical linguistics, and more specifically to lexicology, since it begins with the study of one word in one particular language, but the reader will quickly notice that cuotxEiov is not the object of my study, but merely one of the names of my object of study, and it is valuable only because of its synthetic semantic power, and because of its place in the history of Greek philosophy. Because this is in fact the study of a polysemy, the words themselves, στοιχειον or elementum or sefirah or harf, are only important as facets of the 'jewel' (jawhar, Arabic for jewel, essence, Greek ousia), or as gateways into the fullness of the concept.
By studying the words, we see more clearly the aspects of the concept, which in turn allows us to identify other terms used for one or other aspect of the same root concept, in what is already part of a semantic enquiry, or the history of an idea.

1. I have added hyphens for the sake of clarity, whereas in the original coining, they may or may not have been used, unique for each word and person who coined or first used the term.
2. This page was prompted into mind, following discussion with new EAN user Ok-Introduction-1940, who states that Fideler’s Sun of God, which is a top 5 EAN required reading book 📚, was “illuminating”. Whence, Fideler‘s work is mostly “Greek alpha-numerics“ (GAN), as compared to “Egypto alpha-numerics” (EAN), which is the core of all of them.

• On the coining of Egypto alphanumerics
• How many engineers does it take to decode the alphabet?
• Six-volume Egypto alpha numerics (EAN) book 📚 set?
• Ishango bone 🦴, Congo, Africa (20,000A/-18,045), and number four: 𓏽, to number eight: 𓐁, to letter H evolution: » 𓏽 + 𓏽 » 𓐁 » 𐤇 » H » 𐌇 » 𐡇
• Anatomy of a Letter

• Diels, Hermann. (64A/1899). Elementum: a preliminary work on the Greek and Latin Thesaurus (Elementum: eine Vorarbeit zum griechischen und lateinischen Thesaurus). Verlag.
• Dornseiff, Franz. (35A/c.1920). Stoicheia: Studies for the History of Ancient Worldview and of Greek Scholarship (Stoicheia: Studien zur Geschichte der antiken Weltanschauung und der griechischen Wissenschaft). Publisher.
• Dornseiff, Franz. (33A/1922). The Alphabet in Mysticism and Magic; or Stoicheia: Studies on the History of the Ancient Worldview and Greek Science (Das Alphabet in Mystik und Magie (= Stoicheia: Studien zur Geschichte des antiken Weltbildes und der griechischen Wissenschaft). Leipzig.
• Swift, Peter. (A17/1972). Egyptian Alphanumerics: A theoretical framework along with miscellaneous departures. Part I: The Narrative being a description of the proposed system, linguistic associations, numeric correspondences and religious meanings. Part II: Analytics being a detailed presentation of the analytical work (abstract). Publisher, A68/2023.
• Fideler, David. (A38/1993). Jesus Christ, Sun of God: Ancient Cosmology and Early Christian Symbolism (pdf-file) (§: Gematria Index [image], pgs. 425-26). Quest Books.
• Barry, Kieren. (A44/1999). The Greek Qabalah: Alphabetic Mysticism and Numerology in the Ancient World (pdf-file) (§: Appendix II: Dictionary of Isopsephy, pgs. 215-271). Weiser.
• Psychoyos, Dimitris. (A50/2005). “The Forgotten Art of Isopsephy: and the Magic Number KZ” (abst) (Acad), Semiotica, 154:157-224.
• Gadalla, Moustafa. (A61/2016). Egyptian Alphabetical Letters of Creation Cycle. Publisher.
• Helou, Rihab. (A62/2017). The Phoenician Alphabet: Hidden Mysteries. Notre Dame.
• Acevedo, Juan. (A60/2015), “The Idea of Stoicheîon in Grammar and Cosmology from Plato to Agrippa" (pdf-file), MPhil/PhD Proposal, Supervisor: Charles Burnet. Warburg Institute.
• Acevedo, Juan. (A63/2018). The of Στοιχεῖον (Stoicheion) in Grammar and Cosmology: From Antique Roots to Medieval Systems (pdf-file). PhD thesis. Warburg Institute, University of London.
• Acevedo, Juan. (A65/2020). Alphanumeric Cosmology From Greek into Arabic: The Idea of Stoicheia Through the Medieval Mediterranean (pdf-file) (preview) (A64 video) (A66 podcast). Publisher.
• Acevedo, Juan. (A64/2019). “Alphanumeric Cosmology: The Grammar and Arithmetic of the Cosmos”, YouTube, King‘s Foundation, Oct 23.
• Acevedo, Juan. (A65/2020). Alphanumeric Cosmology From Greek into Arabic: The Idea of Stoicheia Through the Medieval Mediterranean (pdf-file) (preview). Publisher.
• Acevedo, Juan. (A66/2021). “Title” (A66 podcast).
• Thims, Libb. (A66/2021). Abioism [a-282-ism]: No Thing is Alive, Life Does Not Exist, Terminology Reform, and Concept Upgrade (pdf-file) (§: Isopsephy, pgs. xxxv-xl). LuLu.

• Alphanumerics - Hmolpedia A66.
• Isopspehy - Hmolpedia A66.
• Gematria - Hmolpedia A66.

“The names Brahma (ब्रह्मा) & Saraswati (सरस्वती), the Sanskrit husband-wife pair, and Abraham (אַבְרָהָם) & Sarah (שרה), the Hebrew husband-wife pair, must derive from a single original ‘common source’ parent language, namely: the Ra (𓏲𓌹), the name of the Egyptian sun 🌞 god; or one copied from the other?
— Guillaume Postel (403A/1552), The Book of Jezirah by the patriarch Abraham; quote shown is a condensed paraphrase of all the Abraham and Brahma theories, e.g. Voltaire (195A/1760) said Abraham and Brahma were identical; Constantin Volney, in The Ruins (164A/1791), said the Hindu version derived from the Hebrew version; Samuel Dunlap, in his Vestiges of the Spirit History of Man (97A/1858), was the first to break the names Brahma and Abraham down into ram and Ra as the original root; Thomas Scott, in his The Serpent in Mythology (79A/1876) was the first to explicitly state that Brahma and Abraham were based on the Egyptian Ra sun 🌞 god.

“Sanskrit (संस्कृत), Greek (Έλληνε), Latin, Gothic, Celtic, and possibly old Persian, must have sprung from some common source.”
— William Jones (169A/1786), Asiatick Society of Bengal, Third Anniversary Discourse, Presidential address; named the “Indo-European“ (Indo-Europeenne) family by Thomas Young (142A/1813); named the “Indo-Germanic” (Indogermanische) language family by Julius Klaproth (132A/1823)

“The names Abram and Brahma are equivalent in numerical value.”
— Charles King (91A/1864), The Gnostics and Their Remains, Ancient and Mediaeval (pg. 13); cited by Helena Blavatsky (67A/1888) in her Secret Doctrine manuscript notes; cited by Annie Besant (58A/1897) in her The Secret Doctrine: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Philosophy (pg. 95), based on Blavatsky’s notes; cited by Hilton Hotema (A8/1963) in The Secret Regeneration (pg. 137)

1. Schizophrenic, schizotypy, schizo-whatever
2. Anti-Semitic
3. Pareidolic
4. Crazy
5. Apophenic
6. Lunatic
7. Racist
8. Numerologist

• Rule 3

• Ban rules update 4+ users were perm-banned this month
• Two people were temp-banned today, one for slurring Georgi Gladyshev, who has nothing at all to do with EAN, as a fake or lying scientist. Again: this sub is for people interested in the Egyptian origin of the alphabet and language. Don’t like this view, then don’t join this sub!
• Miggs cell rule
• Miggs 🤪 cell rule!?, i.e. attack the argument, not the person, revisited!
• Candy 🍬 user count table. Treats are bad, yes?
• Testing new reply model to angry 😡 or confused 🫤 egg-head 🥚-head comments?

• Linguistic Hisham two-cultures syndrome
• Criticism of Islam ☪️ vs Criticism of PIE 🥧
• 60% to 95% of linguists and Egyptologists suffer from Hisham syndrome

“The Brahma (ब्रह्मा) & Saraswati (सरस्वती) husband-wife pair, in Sanskrit, and the Abraham (אַבְרָהָם) & Sarah (שרה) husband-wife pair, in Hebrew, must derive from a single original ‘common source’ parent language or one copied from the other?
— Guillaume Postel (403A/1552), The Book of Jezirah by the patriarch Abraham; quote shown is a condensed paraphrase of all the Abraham and Brahma theories, e.g. Voltaire (195A/1760) said Abraham and Brahma were identical; Constantin Volney, in The Ruins (164A/1791), said the Hindu version derived from the Hebrew version; Samuel Dunlap, in his Vestiges of the Spirit History of Man (97A/1858), was the first to break the names Brahma and Abraham down into Ram and Ra as the original common root

“Sanskrit (संस्कृत), Greek (Έλληνε), Latin, Gothic, Celtic, and possibly old Persian, must have sprung from some common source.”
— William Jones (169A/1786), Asiatick Society of Bengal, Third Anniversary Discourse, Presidential address, Feb 2

“The names Abram and Brahma are equivalent in numerical value.”
— Charles King (91A/1864), The Gnostics and Their Remains, Ancient and Mediaeval (pg. 13); cited by Helena Blavatsky (67A/1888) in her Secret Doctrine manuscript notes; cited by Annie Besant (58A/1897) in her The Secret Doctrine: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Philosophy (pg. 95), based on Blavatsky’s notes; cited by Hilton Hotema (A8/1963) in The Secret Regeneration (pg. 137)

1. Greek
2. Sanskrit
3. Hebrew
4. Latin
5. Persian
6. Gothic
7. Celtic

“A new scientific truth , e.g. EAN, does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents, e.g. PIE or Semiticism, eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.”
— Max Planck (6A/1949), Scientific Autobiography (pgs. 33-34)

My main bitch and my side bitch are out of your league.

black geniuses are a rarer breed.

­Θ = 318 = Ηλιος = ☀️

1. Racist
2. Classist
3. Numerologist
4. Lunatic
5. Pareidolia-ist
6. Apophenia-ist
7. Schizophrenic

”No one discusses the possibility of the invention of alphabetic writing being the work of Egyptian engineers even though the myths seem to point in this direction?“
— Dimitris Psychoyos (A50/2005), “The Forgotten Art of Isopsephy“ (pg. 208)

That four engineers, namely: Peter Swift 🇺🇸, Moustafa Gadalla 🇪🇬/🇺🇸, Rihab Helou 🇱🇧, and Libb Thims 🇺🇸, independently, decoded the mathematical structure of the alphabet, points to the conclusion that alphabet, originally, was invented by engineers.

What you are doing is just setting up your ideological bubble to feel good about yourself, knowing that everyone else is stupid and despicable except you, your clique and those who agree with you, while projecting your ill-natured and vile attitude onto others, helped by dollar store dismissals and mod "powers" in what you wanted to be your echo-chamber (let's not forget that for some actually arguing is rather difficult without dirty and cheap tactics!), while fighting a "Great Patriotic War" against "racist aryanist linguists", in a fantasy world where every day something "groundbreaking" is discovered in your intestines.

28 Leiden I350 lunar 🌖 stanzas = 28 Greek, Hebrew, and Arabic letters

• Beekes, Robert. (A40/1995). Comparative Indo-European Linguistics (Arch) (text) (pdf-file). Publisher, A56/2011.
• Psychyos, Dimitris. (A50/2005). “The Forgotten Art of Isopsephy: and the Magic Number KZ” (abst) (Acad), Semiotica, 154:157-224.